More Apache issues

2003-03-16 Thread Brian Witowski
Greets,

Since upgrading to Apache 2.0.44, a few things appear to not work any
longer.  For instance, trying to start apache from withing Webmin no longer
works.  I've looked at the paths in the module configuration and everything
appears to be in order.  It gives a message "Failed to start apache", but
upon doing a ps -ax, I have 6 httpd's running.  So it appears that it is in
fact running.  Which is fine.  But since the Webmin module thinks it failed,
I never get the the 'Stop Apached' option, or 'Restart' option for that
matter.

Also, if I attempt to set up virtual hosts (name, not address), it ignores
the virtual hosts and will only allow me to access the default host.  I had
two virtual hosts working prior to upgrading.  I have given the aliases 'C'
records in bind configuration etc.

Any pointers or info on using apache 2.x with Webmin 1.070?

Brian
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Apache Problem

2003-03-13 Thread Brian Witowski
Ok.  It was the path.  Thanks.

But now I have a different problem.  I like to manage Apache through Webmin.
But when I try to start apache from within the Webmin module, it says
"Failed to Start Apache", but doing ps -ax shows 5 instances of httpd.  In
addition, I can no longer get virtual hosts to work.  I can only get to the
default host.

Does anybody know of any issues with apache 2.x and webmin? (I'm running the
most current webmin).

brian


> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded to Apache 2.0.44 (from source) on a Caldera 3.1 Linux box.
> Installation went fine, however I no longer have a /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd
> file to launch httpd.  I did track down the /usr/local/apache2/apachectl
> file which appears to have the same function.

Using apachectl is the preferred way to start/stop Apache.

> In other words, typing in "./apachectl start" will start the daemon.  My
> problem is that I can't make it executable!  I have tried every 'chmod'
> combination possible.  I've tried chmod a+x and even that doesn't work.
It
> needs to have the "./" in front of it.

If your are in the /usr/local/apache2 directory you have to have the ./
in there so it knows to look in the current directory for the script. If
you are in a directory other than the /usr/local/apache2 directory
apachectl should work if you put /usr/local/apache2 in your path. Or you
can use the full path to apachectl.

If you want to start Apache at boot time stick
/usr/local/apache2/apachectl start in the /etc/rc.local file.

>
> Does this version NOT have the /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd script?  Why can't I
> make it executable?

Did you install Apache the first time during the install of the OS?  I
believe when I once used Apache from the default install of the OS it
had the /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd and other times when I compiled from
source it didn't.  That was awhile ago and my memory is no good.  YMMV.


--Tom Wilson
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Apache problem

2003-03-10 Thread Brian Witowski


Hi,

I just upgraded to Apache 2.0.44 (from source) on a Caldera 3.1 Linux box.
Installation went fine, however I no longer have a /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd
file to launch httpd.  I did track down the /usr/local/apache2/apachectl
file which appears to have the same function.

In other words, typing in "./apachectl start" will start the daemon.  My
problem is that I can't make it executable!  I have tried every 'chmod'
combination possible.  I've tried chmod a+x and even that doesn't work.  It
needs to have the "./" in front of it.

Does this version NOT have the /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd script?  Why can't I
make it executable?

Brian

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Samba and profile stuff

2003-02-24 Thread Brian Witowski
Hey all,

I have a Samba server running on COL 2.4.18.  It is set up as a DC, complete
with Home directories etc.

My problem is that if I delete something from the desktop of my workstation,
it doesn't get deleted from /$Home/desktop.  Then when I log back in, its
back on my desktop.  I want to use profiles, but not necessarily 'roaming'
profiles and would like to continue to have $Home directories, but  I would
like the profile to be kept locally.

Can this be done?  How would I go about doing it?

Brian

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


RE: Linux choking on large files

2003-02-23 Thread Brian Witowski
I will look at that.  I believe I have a Kingston in there, which uses the
Intel chip set.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: Chong Yu Meng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 8:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Linux choking on large files
>
>
> Are you using an Intel NIC ? I had that same problem shortly before the
> NIC died !
>
> Regards,
> pascal chong
>
>
>
> Brian Witowski wrote:
>
> >I recently began having problems transferring large files to my
> COL 2.4.18
> >kernel and Samba 2.22.
> >
> >I first noticed the problem when a large email attachment got hung in the
> >queue.  I tried to flush it but it was locked for sending.  (I
> use my server
> >as a mail relay for my network, along with fetchmail and
> procmail).  When I
> >tried to flush it, I would temporarily lose network access to my
> server.  No
> >Samba, SSH, or Webmin.  Then it would start working again.
> >
> >Later on I was attempting to copy a 45MB file to the server and
> I lost all
> >connectivity.  Once the copy errored out and I canceled the copy, the
> >network came back.  The only errors I have found were on the
> console of the
> >server:
> >
> >hda: irq timeout : Status=0xD0 {Busy}
> >IDE0: reset: success
> >
> >In addition I saw this once:
> >
> >ll_rw_block: device 03:03: only 512-char blocks implemented (1152).
> >
> >Suspecting a hard drive problem, I changed to runlevel 1, then dismounted
> >the partitions and did an e2fsck -c on them.   It found and fixed a few
> >problems, which I suspected it would since it had been hard
> booted a couple
> >times in the last year due to power failures etc.
> >
> >Also, I ran some low-level hardware diagnostics on the hard
> drives and they
> >came up clean.
> >
> >Any ideas what may be causing this issue?  The logs are clean.
> >
> >Brian
> >
> >
> >___
> >Linux-users mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc ->
> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> >
> >
>
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Linux choking on large files

2003-02-21 Thread Brian Witowski
I recently began having problems transferring large files to my COL 2.4.18
kernel and Samba 2.22.

I first noticed the problem when a large email attachment got hung in the
queue.  I tried to flush it but it was locked for sending.  (I use my server
as a mail relay for my network, along with fetchmail and procmail).  When I
tried to flush it, I would temporarily lose network access to my server.  No
Samba, SSH, or Webmin.  Then it would start working again.

Later on I was attempting to copy a 45MB file to the server and I lost all
connectivity.  Once the copy errored out and I canceled the copy, the
network came back.  The only errors I have found were on the console of the
server:

hda: irq timeout : Status=0xD0 {Busy}
IDE0: reset: success

In addition I saw this once:

ll_rw_block: device 03:03: only 512-char blocks implemented (1152).

Suspecting a hard drive problem, I changed to runlevel 1, then dismounted
the partitions and did an e2fsck -c on them.   It found and fixed a few
problems, which I suspected it would since it had been hard booted a couple
times in the last year due to power failures etc.

Also, I ran some low-level hardware diagnostics on the hard drives and they
came up clean.

Any ideas what may be causing this issue?  The logs are clean.

Brian
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


RE: Comcast: Changing ip's

2002-07-08 Thread Brian Witowski

I'm confused as to exactly what they were claiming you did wrong.  It is not
uncommon for a broadband provider to prohibit running websites on
residential accounts.  However they usually don't mind a mail server.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joel Hammer
> Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 10:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Comcast: Changing ip's
>
>
> Just to share a frustrating experience and maybe gather enthusiasm for a
> class action lawsuit or something.
>
> I use the local cable monopoly for my ISP, comcast.
>
> I use linux, obviously.
>
> I used dhcpcd to get my dynamically assigned ip address. The last time (in
> fact every time) I have gotten an address from comcast, the lease has been
> infinite, at least I think that a lease time of:
>
> LEASETIME=4294967295
> RENEWALTIME=259200
> REBINDTIME=3758096383
>
> is infinite in the unix world.
>
> As a result, dhcpcd, instead of starting and staying a daemon,
> watching for
> the server to reassign the number, always exits after getting this lease
> time, saying that the lease was infinite, and so why bother running.
>
> Last night I lost my cable connection. I could see local traffic
> but nothing
> else.
>
> I finally called comcast 18 hours later, and was told, after many hours,
> (really, about three hours) that they had disconnected me. They had
> reassigned my ip number and since I had  a static setup (third party
> software according to one service person) I was not allowed on their
> service and "one more incident like this and they would discontinue my
> account permanently." I did point out that I wouldn't mind that at all.
>
> I tried to explain, but, of course, this was not possible. After begging,
> they allowed me to obtain another dynamic ip number. That was
> nice of them,
> since I am a paying customer. It was nice of them to just d/c my service
> without notice. It was nice of them to cause this mess by assigning me an
> infinite lease to begin with.
>
> Sigh. They, being a monopoly, like best to deal with another monopoly,
> windows.
>
> But, after hours of work, all seems to be working again. Gaadd. What a
> bother.
>
> I wonder how those lindows computers will fare with this sort of hostile
> environment to linux?
>
> Joel
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Client Switching to Linux

2002-07-01 Thread Brian Witowski

All good advice, but I would still keep a Wintel box around as a backup.  In
theory it shouldn't be needed, but try telling the client that when the box
with VMWare blows up and he can't do his books.  Or when he complains that
he doesn't like the performance hit by running multiple O.S.'s.  Besides,
there is nothing inherently wrong with keeping 'extra hardware around'.
Besides, its just good sense to have some sort of fallback when implementing
ANY type of new solution, hardware or software.  Most larger corporations IT
depts. will beta test new apps/O.S.'s/Hardware for months before rolling
out.  There's good reason for it.

Good Luck.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 8:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Client Switching to Linux
>
>
> Michael Hipp wrote:
> > I have a client that is considering switching to Linux on his desktops.
> > Yippee! Here's the app list we have to replace:
> >
> > Windows XP  -> Red Hat 7.3 Pro
> > MS Word -> StarOffice 6.0
> > MS Excel->  "
> > MS PowerPnt ->  "
> > MS Outlook  -> Evolution (???)
> > MS Access   -> (keep a Win machine handy???)
> > QuickBooks  -> (keep a Win machine handy???)
> > Palm sync   -> ???
> >
> > Is Evolution really a good replacement for Outlook? What do I do about
> > syncing the Palm?
>
> There are quite a few options for this.  See freshmeat for suggestions.
>
> >
> > This client is an attorney; very smart, tired of Windows. I
> already have a
> > server ready to go in his office (Dell PowerEdge 500SC with Red Hat 7.3
> > Pro).
> >
> > Thoughts? Advice?
>
> Either StarOffice-6.0 (if he's willing to spend the money) or
> OpenOffice-1.0 for Excel, Powerpoint stuff.  In fact, i'd say, instead
> of keeping additional hardware around, use VMware if he really must have
> any of the M$-Office stuff, or access/quickbooks.
>
> --
> ~
> L. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:  http://netllama.ipfox.com
>
>5:05pm  up 72 days, 23:53,  2 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.20, 0.30
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Mail server issues

2002-06-29 Thread Brian Witowski



> > I am getting the following error in my fetchmail log file upon
> trying to get mail from a POP3/IMAP account:
> >
> >
> > fetchmail: SMTP connect to localhost failed
> > fetchmail: can't raise the listener; falling back to
> /usr/bin/procmail -d %T
fetchmail: IMAP< )
> >
> > I only get it with one account.  I don't have a problem with it 'falling
> > back' but it takes about 7 or 8 minutes to time out.  I don't
> know enough
> > about email to figure out what it's trying to do.  Any suggestions as to
> > what is causing the error and how to fix it?
> >
>
> Is the user name at the remote server the same as the local where you're
> trying to deliver the mail? If the names are different then you should be
> using something like the following line in fetchmailrc

Sendmail is running, if I do ps -ax it shows sendmail: accepting
connections.
My wife has her own email account on a different domain, and hers works
fine.  Now I have to pinpoint what the differences are.

The local and remote usernames are the same.

Brian

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Mail server issues

2002-06-27 Thread Brian Witowski

I am getting the following error in my fetchmail log file upon trying to get
mail from a POP3/IMAP account:


fetchmail: SMTP connect to localhost failed
fetchmail: can't raise the listener; falling back to /usr/bin/procmail -d
%Tfetc
hmail: IMAP< )

I only get it with one account.  I don't have a problem with it 'falling
back' but it takes about 7 or 8 minutes to time out.  I don't know enough
about email to figure out what it's trying to do.  Any suggestions as to
what is causing the error and how to fix it?

Thanks,
Brian


BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



RE: virus scanning for linux email downloader

2002-06-27 Thread Brian Witowski

Perhaps not.  You're just a dick and you repulse people.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 7:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: virus scanning for linux email downloader
>
>
> Gerry Doris wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Net Llama! wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Gerry Doris wrote:
> >>
> >>>I originally tried to use MIMEdefang but never could get it to work.  I
> >>>was intrigued with the author's view that he doesn't supply
> binaries...if
> >>>you don't know how to compile code then you shouldn't be
> trying to use his
> >>>app.  I can see his point but it still seems to be rather stupid to me.
> >>
> >>Actually, i think its downright brilliant.  I think anyone running a
> >>server (and that's the only way you're going to need to use mimedefang)
> >>should be able to compile some software.  Its not brain surgery
> folks.  If
> >>the only way you know how to run a server is via the InstallShield(tm),
> >>then you have no business being a sysadmin.
> >
> >
> > Never said anything about InstallShield...you did.  I also
> didn't say that
> > I didn't know how to compile.
>
> And i never accused you of either.  Touched a raw nerve, did i?
>
> --
> ~
> L. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:  http://netllama.ipfox.com
>
>4:30pm  up 68 days, 23:18,  2 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.28, 0.43
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: email server question

2002-06-26 Thread Brian Witowski

Federico,
Thanks!
Your solution seemed to work.  Except it will time out when the destination
is a domain that is not cached on the mail server.  It seems to want to
resolve the domain before it will accept the outgoing email.  Any ideas on
that?

Thanks again,
Brian

> >My problem is I am using a dial-up account and pppd on the
> server.  When I
> >try to do a send/receive on a workstation, it fails if the server is not
> >connected.  My question: Is there a way to cache the outgoing mail on the
> >server instead of the workstation?  And have the server send it
> when there
> >is a connection?
> >
>
> Yes, you can.
>
> If you have a stock sendmail (and sendmail-cf installed), you have to
> add this to /usr/share/sendmail/cf/cf/generic-openlinux.mc:
>
> define(`confDELIVERY_MODE', `deferred')
>
> and possibly
>
> FEATURE(accept_unresolvable_domains)
>
> Then exec:
>
> mta-switch newconfig
>
> This will rebuild /etc/mail/sendmail.cf. Restart sendmail and you're
> ready.
>
> It's a good idea to exec sendmail -q upon connection (it will process
> the mail queue).
>
> PS: backup /etc/mail/sendmail.cf before doing mta-switch newconfig (in
> case something fails).
>
>
> Federico Voges
> Socio gerente
>
> Intrasoft
> Malabia 2137 14 A
> (1425) Buenos Aires
> Argentina
>
> Te/Fax: 54-11-4833-5182
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web: http://www.intrasoft.com.ar
>
> PGP Public Key Fingerprint: A536 4595 EB6F D197  FBC1 5C3A 145C 2516
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates,
> Inc. and its affiliated companies.
>
> iQA/AwUBPRotjRRcJRaVKt4XEQIF2wCgiJr8FETI+mtWFW+zrlhgeubhIfwAoLH0
> CiAX9Z+2tOOC1VP83JY9VBKc
> =0dbQ
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



email server question

2002-06-26 Thread Brian Witowski

My COL 3.1 server acts as a router/gateway and mail server running smtp.  My
workstations are set up with my server as the POP3 and smtp server.
Fetchmail goes out and retrieves mail from POP3 accounts periodically and
dumps it in the corresponding linux account.  This makes getting email
appear to be faster and works great.

My problem is I am using a dial-up account and pppd on the server.  When I
try to do a send/receive on a workstation, it fails if the server is not
connected.  My question: Is there a way to cache the outgoing mail on the
server instead of the workstation?  And have the server send it when there
is a connection?


Thanks,
Brian



BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



pppd question

2002-06-25 Thread Brian Witowski

What script is used to pass modem strings to the modem (such as s0=0) when
using pppd?

Thanks,
Brian



BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



Apache Question

2002-06-21 Thread Brian Witowski

I have Apache running on my server.  I also have the default COL page still
intact.  But somehow, while trying to create virtual servers, I messed
something up.

I'm getting a 403 Forbidden error.  It says "You don't have permission to
access / on this server".  So I deleted the virtual servers, but now I'm
having the same problem with the default server.

All of my config changes have been done with the Webmin Apache module.  I
don't believe I ever changed any permissions etc.  And I haven't manually
edited any config files.  I'm  not sure where to look to fix these
"permissions".  Could somebody steer me in the right direction?

Thanks,
Brian



BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



RE: Still the best...

2002-06-20 Thread Brian Witowski

After checking the UnitedLinux web site, I have to say, this is the smartest
thing anybody's done for Linux in quite some time.  All the different
distros, package managers etc only serve to confuse matters from the
end-users' point of view.

Even if it lacks a few features or isn't exactly what everybody wants, at
least it's a step toward some sort of standard so everybodys speaking the
same language.  What would really help it along would be if Red Hat would
get involved.  Right or wrong, many seem to think that Red Hat is the
standard.  Imagine how much easier it would be if we all had the same basic
file structure (with regard to config files), same config files, same
package manager etc.

Should be interesting.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthew Carpenter
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Still the best...
>
>
> I'm with you.  Completely addicted to the benefits of OL.  I will feel a
> bit uneasy until I either see them elsewhere or see Caldera making better
> decisions.
>
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:45:53 -0400
> "Jerry McBride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Which brings me to the meaning behind the subject line of this message.
> > As poorly as it's been promoted, taken cared of, etc... nothing even
> > comes close to OpenLinux. Once you get it installed, you end up with
> > totally functioning install, no bull shit. A quick overlay of a few
> > config files with pre-edited ones, restart a few daemons and... you're
> > all done. I can only hope that United Linux isn't "the death knell for
> > OL"... Damn... it rhymes too...
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Getting email remotely

2002-06-18 Thread Brian Witowski

Howdy,

I use a linux box as an email server.  It running sendmail.  I also have
Fetchmail running which goes out and retrieves mail from two seperate POP3
accounts and dumps them in my local linux accounts.

My connection is dynamic but IF I knew my IP address, what would be the
easiest/best way to read my email from another location?  Which ports would
I have to open up?

Thanks,
Brian



BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



KDE 3 Question

2002-05-23 Thread Brian Witowski

What happened to the admin tools that were included with KDE2?  I don't recall 
the exact names of the tools but I recall there were applets for determining 
modules loaded at boot time, daemons, etc.  Were these specific to COL?  As I 
recall they were under Preferences|System.

Thanks,
Brian

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: GRUB & LILO

2002-05-22 Thread Brian Witowski

Went off without a hitch.  Thanks all!

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Collins
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: GRUB & LILO
> 
> 
> On Wed, 22 May 2002 07:16:58 -0400 "Brian Witowski"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How would I go about removing LILO from a HD and replacing it with
> > GRUB? There is only one OS on the machine, if that matters.
> > 
> 
> 1. make sure you have a lilo boot disk, and verify that it works
> 2. Install grub software (rpm, tarballs, your choice)
> 3. Read the 'info grub' files.  You could also setup a grub boot
> floppy.  This is covered in the info files.
> 4. Now you should create /boot/grub directory and copy all grub
> *stage* files to that directory.
> 5. create /boot/grub/menu.lst.  Here's a sample
> 
> default 0
> timeout 10
> title=Gentoo-19-r5-hda2
> root (hd0,1)
> kernel /boot/bzImage-2.4.19-gentoo-r5 root=/dev/hda2 hdc=ide-scsi
> hdd=ide-scsi ro
> title=elx17-hda6
> root (hd0,5)
> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.17 root=/dev/hda6 hdc=ide-scsi ro
> title=Win98
> root (hd0,0)
> makeactive
> chainloader +1
> 
> 6. In the following root is the address of the partition with
> /boot/grub partition in grub terminology, i.e. hda2 = hd0,1
>   root (hd0,1)
>   setup (hd0)
> 5. Reboot and enjoy
> 
> 
> -- 
> Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD?
> gentoo(since 01/01/01) 2.4.18+(ext3) xfce-sylpheed-mozilla
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



GRUB & LILO

2002-05-22 Thread Brian Witowski

How would I go about removing LILO from a HD and replacing it with GRUB?
There is only one OS on the machine, if that matters.

Brian


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: I'm a dad!!

2002-05-16 Thread Brian Witowski

Just try not to rag on him for being a 'newbie'.  ;)

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE:  I'm a dad!!
>
>
> Llama,
>
> You didn't take enough pictures...   ;^)).
>
> CONGRATULATIONS!!!
>
> Keith B. (A Pediatrician from NoVA).
>
> "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I'm incredibly pleased to announce that I became the father of a 8lb,
> >12oz boy today.  Being my
> >first child, he'll be spoiled every which way possible.
> >Pictures of the little guy can be found here:
> >http://linux-sxs.org/~netllama
> >
> >--
> >
> >~
> >L. Friedman                                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:                http://netllama.ipfox.com
> >
> >___
> >Linux-users mailing list -
> http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> >Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at
> the above URL.
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: New Step

2002-05-15 Thread Brian Witowski

Very nice Step!  Well done.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nobody
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: New Step
> 
> 
> Thanks to Doug Hunley we now have a Step on Installing KDE3 from source.
> You may find this step at http://www.linux-sxs.org/kde3-build.html
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Opinions Needed

2002-05-11 Thread Brian Witowski

Lonni,

Have you ever just answered a question?  Without the sarcastic overtones and
comments?  Your comment contributed absolutely nothing to the question being
asked.  Perhaps a more diplomatic answer would have been: "I think its just
fluff because others are running it on PPC and IA64."  Perhaps that would
throw others off and think there was an imposter posing as you.  Hmmm.

Brian

>
>
> Brian Witowski wrote:
> > Suse is supposedly built specifically for Intel processors.
> Are there any
> > real-world advantages or is it just fluff?
>
> OK, but don't tell that to all the people running SuSE on PPC and IA64
> chips.
>
>
> --
> ~
> L. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo:  http://netllama.ipfox.com
>
>6:20pm  up 22 days,  1:14,  4 users,  load average: 0.16, 0.21, 0.14
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



New KDE3 install question

2002-05-10 Thread Brian Witowski

I just upgraded to Xfree86 4.2 and KDE3 on a server machine (COL 3.11,
2.4.18 kernel).  Everything went amazingly well.  I may even write a SxS
just to consolidate the process.

I do have two minor issues.  First off, my login window is still the old
KDE2 login style.  I have no idea where to look to change that
configuration.
The second issue, my splash screen crashes.  No specific error message other
than that it crashed.  Neither is detrimental to the operation of the system
but I would like to clean it up.

Thanks,
Brian



BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



Opinions Needed

2002-05-10 Thread Brian Witowski

Suse is supposedly built specifically for Intel processors.  Are there any
real-world advantages or is it just fluff?

Also, whats the general opinion of Gentoo thus far?  I think Portage is
awsome.  The need for an internet connection is a drawback but it also has
many advantages.  My Gentoo install seems much less bloated and runs quite
smoothly.  Including KDE3.

Brian



BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



RE: Linux Router's

2002-05-10 Thread Brian Witowski

Well said, Bill.  I have tried to make that point in the past and it simply
escalated into a flame war.  The same holds true for firewalls.  Many argue
its a 'cop out' to buy a black box solution when you can get Linux 'free'.
Folks who aren't in the IT/IS services business simply don't realize of the
implications of utilizing a relative non-standard solution.  The reality is,
you better have 2 old PC's, 4 old NIC's and a Ghost image of the original
machine.  Thats the only way you'll be able to get back on line in a
time-line comparable to a black box solution.  And at the end of the day,
thats the only thing the 'brass' will notice.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Campbell
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Linux Router's
>
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:22:28PM -0400, Tim Wunder wrote:
> ...
>
> >Hmmm... cheap=$180? For a simple router? Suppose the OP has an old PC
> >laying around doing nothing that costs $0, and a coupla 10 MB NICs that
> >cost $0. Is spending $180 still cheap?
>
> It is if they're paying me $150/hour to do the work.  It's also very
> expensive for a business if they're offline for some reason
> because the old
> hardware goes south on them.
>
> As I said in my original post, if you're doing it as a hobby, or for the
> educational value, then building a router out of old parts works fine.
> Setting up LRP routers is an educational experience, particularly if you
> want to run something out of the ordinary.  On the other hand, if I have a
> customer who needs to connect their employees to their office with a VPN,
> it's far easier to use one of these boxes which they can configure
> themselves with a few minutes phone conversation, and it Just Works(tm).
>
> Bill
> --
> INTERNET:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
> UUCP:   camco!bill  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
> FAX:(206) 232-9186  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820;
> (206) 236-1676
> URL: http://www.celestial.com/
>
> ``UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that
> would also stop you from doing clever things.'' -- Doug Gwyn
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: KDE from scratch (source)

2002-05-10 Thread Brian Witowski

It has been my experience that inaction is invariably 'easier' than taking
action.  i.e It's easier to not mow the lawn than it is to mow the lawn.
Does that make me a sodo-masochist if I opt to mow the lawn?  Just curious.
Just when I thought I had shit figured out...


G'day

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kurt Wall
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: KDE from scratch (source)
>
>
> Scribbling feverishly on May 09, Brian Witowski managed to emit:
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> > >
> > > THe interpretation *is* the solution.  Create a symlink to
> fix the mess.
> > > Or don't use KDE, whichever is easier :)
> >
> > Are those my only options?  Can't I do whichever is harder?
>
> Absolutely.
>
> Kurt
> --
> It is the business of little minds to shrink.
>   -- Carl Sandburg
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: KDE from scratch (source)

2002-05-09 Thread Brian Witowski



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: KDE from scratch (source)
> 
> 
> On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:
> > > > > > ---stuff deleted---
> > > > > > ,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/qt-3.0.3/lib -Wl,--rpath 
> -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib
> > > > > > g++: /usr/lib/.libs/libsane.so: No such file or directory
> > > > >
> > > > > Your answer is right here --^
> > > >
> > > > That was my first guess, however:
> > > >
> > > > [root@server /root]# locate libsane.so
> > > > /usr/lib/libsane.so.1
> > > > /usr/lib/libsane.so.1.0.3
> > > > /usr/lib/libsane.so
> > >
> > > You're missing the point.  Its looking for libsane.so in 
> /usr/lib/.libs/
> >
> > Sorry, I guess I wasn't very clear (silly me!).  I understand 
> it is looking
> > for a file in a place that it doesn't exist.  I was looking for 
> a solution
> > to the problem, not an interpretation of the message.
> 
> THe interpretation *is* the solution.  Create a symlink to fix the mess.
> Or don't use KDE, whichever is easier :)

Are those my only options?  Can't I do whichever is harder?
- 
> ~~
> Lonni J Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMohttp://netllama.ipfox.com
> 
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: KDE from scratch (source)

2002-05-09 Thread Brian Witowski



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: KDE from scratch (source)
>
>
> On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 7:00 PM
> > > To: Linux Users
> > > Subject: Re: KDE from scratch (source)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 8 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:
> > > > Im attempting to install KDE3 from source.  I've installed virtually
> > > > everything except addons, since its suggested to do that last.
> > > The problem
> > > > I'm having is with kdegraphics.  It will ./configure without
> > > error but when
> > > > I do a 'make' I get this:
> > > >
> > > > ---stuff deleted---
> > > > ,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/qt-3.0.3/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib
> > > > g++: /usr/lib/.libs/libsane.so: No such file or directory
> > >
> > > Your answer is right here --^
> >
> > That was my first guess, however:
> >
> > [root@server /root]# locate libsane.so
> > /usr/lib/libsane.so.1
> > /usr/lib/libsane.so.1.0.3
> > /usr/lib/libsane.so
>
> You're missing the point.  Its looking for libsane.so in /usr/lib/.libs/

Sorry, I guess I wasn't very clear (silly me!).  I understand it is looking
for a file in a place that it doesn't exist.  I was looking for a solution
to the problem, not an interpretation of the message.

Brian

> --
> ~~
> Lonni J Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMohttp://netllama.ipfox.com
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Re: Spamming Question

2002-05-03 Thread Brian Witowski

A client of mine recently had their AOL account disabled.  When they inquired 
why, they were told that over 1,000 porn emails had been mass-mailed from 
their account.  Needless to say they didn't send the emails.  Somehow their 
email address was spoofed.  Of course their first problem is using AOL.  They 
have been warned.  My point is, it's pathetic when the largest most prolific 
ISP in the world doesn't have the means in place to prevent this crap.  

Port-Sentry has saved my butt a number of times.

Brian

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Gentoo Installation

2002-04-30 Thread Brian Witowski

Howdy,

I downloaded and installed the stage3 i686 tarball.  All in all, it wasn't
bad.  However I couldn't get grub to install.  I attempted to install it
according to the docs: >Grub root (hd0,0)
  >Grub setup (hd0)

The first command worked fine.  However the second is giving me problems.
When I do this I get one of two messages.  Either an error saying it
couldn't find a stage1 file (it looks in two different locations, dont
recall them though), or if it does find it, it says the device string is
unrecognizable.  These aren't verbatim, but thats the basic message.

My drive is set up as follows:
1st partition 385MB Boot Primary
2nd partition 200MB Swap Logical
3rd partition 9GB Root Logical
4th partition Fat32 w/Win98 already instlled and running.

The Swap and Root are on the same Primary partition.
This is how the partitions show up in Partition Magic.  But if you go by
sectors, the FAT32 partition is actually the 1st partition.  Then the Boot,
Swap and Root partitions.  The FAT32 partion is 32GB.

Does anybody have any suggestions on how to get this beast going with the
existing Win98 FAT32 partition?  Is it possible to install Grub to the Win98
partition w/out losing that OS?  Other suggestions?

Thanks,
Brian


BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



RE: Linux-users digest, Vol 1 #654 - 14 msgs

2002-04-29 Thread Brian Witowski

All of the advice given is good advice.  But I would like to add, stay clear
of Travan format drives.  Very finicky, expensive tapes.  If it will do the
trick for you, a somewhat outdated, but reliable inexpensive solution would
be DAT DDS2 drive.  Tapes are a couple bucks apiece and can handle 8GB
compresses.  Next in line is the DDS3 at 24GB compressed.  Then comes DDS4,
but they are probably pricier than what you're looking for.

Good Luck,

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Linux-users digest, Vol 1 #654 - 14 msgs
>
>
> Send Linux-users mailing list submissions to
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Linux-users digest..."
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Man not working

2002-04-26 Thread Brian Witowski

Greetings,

All of a sudden I can't get any Man entries.  Anything I do a Man for it
says "No Manual Entry for ...".  And it doesn't matter what command I do it
for.  There is no manual entry. I'm running COL 3.1/2.4.18.

I have the manuals in /usr/share/man.  And it seems to be looking in that
path.  If I do a man -d it shows the following:

found man directory /usr/share/man
found man directory /usr/share/man/en
found man directory /usr/man
found man directory /usr/local/man
found man directory /usr/X11R6/man
found man directory /usr/X11R6/man/en
found man directory /opt/teTeX/man
found man directory /opt/teTeX/man/en
found man directory /usr/share/coas/man
found man directory /usr/share/coas/man/en
found manpath map /bin --> /usr/man
found manpath map /sbin --> /usr/man
found manpath map /usr/bin --> /usr/man
found manpath map /usr/sbin --> /usr/man
found manpath map /usr/local/bin --> /usr/local/man
found manpath map /usr/local/sbin --> /usr/local/man
found manpath map /usr/X11R6/bin --> /usr/X11R6/man
found manpath map /usr/bin/X11 --> /usr/X11R6/man
found manpath map /usr/bin/mh --> /usr/man

using less as pager
using default preprocessor sequence
found tbl(1) directive

not executing command:
  (cd /etc/.. ; (echo -e ".ll 9.0i\n.pl 1100i"; /bin/cat /etc/man.conf; echo
".pl \n(nlu+10") | /usr/bin/gtbl | /usr/bin/groff -S -Tlatin1 -mandoc |
less)


Any help is appreciated.

Brian


BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



Ext3 and Quotas

2002-04-24 Thread Brian Witowski

I recently recompiled my kernel with support for EXT3 and converted one of
my partitions.  When I try to setup quotas, it says "No local filesystems
can support quotas".  I thought ext3 could support quotas.  Was I wrong?


Thanks,
Brian


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Error in boot screen

2002-04-20 Thread Brian Witowski

Actually I'm running COL 3.1.  The file is syslog.conf.
Thanks,
Brian

*.debug;mail.none;authpriv.none /var/log/messages
authpriv.notice /var/log/secure
mail.*  /var/log/mail
*.warning   -/var/log/user
#uucp,news.crit /var/log/spooler
kern.*  /var/log/boot.log
daemon.warning  /var/log/pppd
mail.notice /var/log/fetchmail.log



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kurt Wall
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 11:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Error in boot screen
> 
> 
> Scribbling feverishly on April 20, Brian Witowski managed to emit:
> > When my system is booting I get a few errors.  One of which is 
> DS:No Socket
> > Drivers Loaded.  Which service/daemon is generating this?  Or 
> could there be
> > more than one?
> 
> This is a Red Hat-ism, I believe. Please post /etc/sysconf.log.
> 
> Kurt
> -- 
> Try to have as good a life as you can under the circumstances.
> 
> 
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Error in boot screen

2002-04-20 Thread Brian Witowski

When my system is booting I get a few errors.  One of which is DS:No Socket
Drivers Loaded.  Which service/daemon is generating this?  Or could there be
more than one?

Also, is there any kind of buffer or log that stores the boot messages or
messages when changing run levels?  I have used dmesg but don't get the same
results I get when booting.  There are differences.  In additon my boot.log
is empty.  I have it set to log ALL but there's never anything in it.

Thanks in advance.
Brian


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: More KDE3 woes

2002-04-17 Thread Brian Witowski

Sorry about the vagueness.  Its installed in /opt/kde2. I installed/compiled
it from tarballs.  I'm running COL 3.1 with 2.4.18 kernel.

Thanks,
Brian

> depends. how did you install it? tarball? rpm? .deb? and where?
> /opt? /usr?
> - --
> Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
> Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
>   and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org
>
> The fact that no one understands you doesn't mean
> you're an artist.
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE8vgDsSrrWWknCnMIRAo7hAKCU6g7z6enEIK1TSIQ3PX+JZVhUVQCgnw97
> hqlmsSNuIl/p27V560LQzEc=
> =4uim
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



More KDE3 woes

2002-04-17 Thread Brian Witowski

Ok, screw it.  If I decided I wanted to get rid of ALL KDE installations and
start from scratch with just KDE3, which directories would I need to delete?
When I installed KDE3, I installed it over the top of KDE2.  Probably a
mistake.  But I didn't really care because the box is used as a
file/dns/mail server.  However, it would be nice to use KDE on occassion.

Thanks,
Brian


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



KDE3

2002-04-16 Thread Brian Witowski

Phew!  I got KDE3 installed, however it won't launch.  Says $DISPLAY is not
set. Also says 'Could not read connection list.  Please check that the
"dcopserver" program is running.  I'm not really sure where to go from here.
Any ideas?

Brian



BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



which .profile is used

2002-04-15 Thread Brian Witowski

After installing QT 3.0.3 I've noticed that when using vnc, if I open a
shell on the linux box and do a 'set', my paths are not correct.  But if I
go in through SSH from a Win box, the paths are correct, as set in
/root/.profile.  Where is the shell in KDE picking up the settings from?

Thanks,
Brian


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Qt 3.0.3

2002-04-11 Thread Brian Witowski

Well, I thought I had Qt 3 istalled.  Without going into details, it did not
properly install.

So I pulled it out and tried again.  I un-tar'd it to /usr/local/ then
renamed the resulting dir qt.  Did ./configure -thread.  No errors.  Did
make.  No errors.  Did make install and get the following: (these are just
the last several lines)

1 cp: `/usr/local/qt/mkspecs/linux-g++/qplatformdefs.h' and
`/usr/local/qt/mkspecs/linux-2 g++/qplatformdefs.h' are the same file
3 make[2]: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
4 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/qt/qmake'
5 cd src/moc && make
6 make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/qt/src/moc'
7 make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/local/qt/mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf',   needed by `Makefile'.  Stop.
8 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/qt/src/moc'
9 make[1]: *** [src-moc] Error 2
10 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/qt'
11 make: *** [install] Error 2

First off, the 1st line listed seems silly.  Why is it trying to copy a file
to itself?

Secondly, if I am reading line 7 correctly, it can't find
/usr/local/qt/mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf.  Am I right?  And it makes
sense.  I checked /usr/local/qt/mkspecs/linux-g++ and it was empty.

If thats the case, here are some observations.  After doing ./configure and
before doing 'make', there were qmake.conf and qplatformdefs.h in every
platform folder in /usr/local/qt/mkspecs.  But after doing 'make' and before
doing 'make install', they were all gone (the files, not the folders).

Knowing this, I started from scratch and made copies of qmake.conf and
qplatformdefs.h and put them aside for save keeping. (after doing
./configure -thread)  Before doing 'make install', I put the files in
/usr/local/qt/mkspecs/linux-g++.  Then I ran 'make install'.  Got the same
errors.  But, when I looked at qmake.conf and qplatformdefs.h they both
contained error messages as the ONLY text.  qmake.conf contained
'Content-length: 61
Failed to open /usr/local/qt/mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf :' and
qplatformdefs.h contained 'Content-length: 66
Failed to open /usr/local/qt/mkspecs/linux-g++/qplatformdefs.h :'.

Here are my /root/.profile entries:


QTDIR=/usr/local/qt
PATH=$QTDIR/bin:$PATH
MANPATH=$QTDIR/doc/man
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$QTDIR/lib
export QTDIR PATH MANPATH LD_LIBRARY_PATH QMAKESPEC PATH

I've found nothing of use at Trolltech.  If anybody can shed any light on
this, I'd be grateful.

Brian


BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



RE: configuring linux kernel

2002-04-10 Thread Brian Witowski

Do you not recommend xconfig or did you overlook it?

Brian

> 
> Scribbling feverishly on April 10, Wilson A. Galafassi Jr. - 
> Hitechweb managed to emit:
> > how to configure a linux kernel to support modversions.h???
> > thanks
> 
> Run "make menuconfig" in /usr/src/linux, select Loadable module 
> support, then press "y" or "Y" for 
> 
>   [*] Enable loadable module support
>   [*] Set version information on all module symbols
> 
> - OR -
> 
> Run "make config" in /usr/src/linux, type "y" or "Y" at the following 
> two prompts:
> 
> Enable loadable module support (CONFIG_MODULES) [Y/n/?] 
> Set version information on all module symbols 
> (CONFIG_MODVERSIONS) [Y/n/?] 
> 
> http://www.linux-sxs.org/kern1.html
> 
> Kurt
> -- 
> You now have Asian Flu.
> 
> 
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Make errors

2002-04-10 Thread Brian Witowski

Jerry,

Everythings cool.  I took my medication and feel better now.  :)


Brian

> Oppps... what did miss? Are we bar-b-queing again???
> 
> Brian, ignore the flames, ignore the egos, ignore it all... 
> 
> What you could try to do is, re-ask the question you need an answer to. I
> missed that. And if the heat gets too high... Well... there's always
> asbestos underware...
> 
> -- 
> 
> *
> * Registered Linux User Number 185956
>   http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
> 7:21pm  up 29 days, 39 min,  4 users,  load average: 0.04, 0.05, 0.00
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Make errors

2002-04-10 Thread Brian Witowski

I'm not sure what I said that was insulting.  And why are you speaking for
Tim?  He hasn't said anything about being insulted.

Your snide comment about "A good place to start would be to install Qt3 and
KDE3" insinuated that I wasn't competent enough to check the requirements.
Which I did.  This information was incorrectly posted.  If you looked at the
same place I looked you would see that.

With regard to spending time trying to help, you might be able to use your
condecending tone to impress newbies but you have yet to give me a useful
answer on anything I've ever posted.

And judging from past posts, I'm not the only one who is in tune to your
smart-ass tone.  So help or don't help.  Makes no matter

Brian



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Make errors
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Brian Witowski wrote:
> > I checked out the link Tim posted.  It does indeed say 0.4.2 requires
> > KDE 3.  Now that we've established that everybody knows how to read...
>
> I think all we've established is that both Tim & I know how to read, and
> you know how to be insulting to those who have spent time trying to assist
> you.
>
>
>
> --
> ~~
> Lonni J Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step http://netllama.ipfox.com
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Make errors

2002-04-10 Thread Brian Witowski

If you type in kmyfirewall in the search box you'll get what I saw.
Sorry about that.  I pretty much gave up on it.  I downloaded and
installed fwbuilder.  I still had to do some other updates but at
least its running.  It's a drag-and-drop type iptables config tool.
So far it looks good.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Wunder
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Make errors
>
>
> Glad that's straightened out ;-)
> FWIW: a habit I've gotten into when using apps.kde.com to find kde apps
> is to always, always, always go to the projects home page to verify
> several things,
> 1. The app is still actively developed
> 2. I get the most current source
> 3. I can verify the system requirements
>
> BTW, your link pulled up info on the xine ARts plugin...weird...
> I do recall, though, that apps.kde.com said kde2.2.x was supported, in
> addition to kde3.
>
> Let us know if you get it compiled.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
> Brian Witowski wrote:
> > I checked out the link Tim posted.  It does indeed say 0.4.2 requires
> > KDE 3.  Now that we've established that everybody knows how to read...
> >
> > I was in fact trying to build 0.4.2, however I was getting conflicting
> > information from a different source.  It clearly stated KDE 2.2.x.
> > http://apps.kde.com/uk/0/info/vid/5575?
> >
> > Well, the upside is, my Qt is now upgraded to 3.x...
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> >>Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:28 PM
> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Subject: Re: Make errors
> >>
> >>
> >>Which version of kmyfirewall are you trying to build, 0.4.1 or 0.4.2?
> >>
> >>Brian Witowski wrote:
> >>
> >>>I double-checked the requirements at sourceforge and KDE 2.2.0 is whats
> >>>required.  Let me know when you have some usefull input.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>The correct version of KDE would be a good start.  According to the
> >>>>webpage for kmyfirewall the version that you're trying to build
> >>>
> >>requires
> >>
> >>>>KDE3, with qt3.
> >>>
> >>
> >>--
> >>~
> >>L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Linux Step-by-step:
> >>http://netllama.ipfox.com
> >>
> >>   5:25pm  up 11 days,  7:18,  4 users,  load average: 0.24, 0.20, 0.14
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ___
> > Linux-users mailing list -
http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above
URL.
>




___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Make errors

2002-04-10 Thread Brian Witowski

As I said, we must be looking at two different pages.


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Wunder
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 7:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Make errors
> 
> 
> Quoted from you're original post:
> "make[2]: Leaving directory '/opt/kmyfirewall-0.4.2/'"
> 
> You're trying to install version 0.4.2. The homepage for kmyfirewall,
> http://kmyfirewall.sourceforge.net/index.php?kat=download
> clearly states:
> System Requirements versions <= 0.4.1
> 
>  * Linux >= 2.4.x
>  * IPTables >= 1.2.x
>  * KDE >= 2.2.x (with devel packages)
>  * QT >= 2.3.x (with devel packages)
>  * automake, autoconf
> 
> System Requirements versions >= 0.4.2
> 
>  * Linux >= 2.4.x
>  * IPTables >= 1.2.x
>  * KDE >= 3.x (with devel packages)
>  * QT >= 3.0.2 (with devel packages)
>  * automake, autoconf
> 
> So, it seems reasonable that NetLlama's advise to use "correct version 
> of KDE" is dead on.
> Either download 0.4.1, or install KDE3.
> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> Brian Witowski wrote:
> > I double-checked the requirements at sourceforge and KDE 2.2.0 is whats
> > required.  Let me know when you have some usefull input.
> > 
> > 
> >>The correct version of KDE would be a good start.  According to the 
> >>webpage for kmyfirewall the version that you're trying to build 
> requires 
> >>KDE3, with qt3.
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>~
> >>L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Linux Step-by-step: 
> > 
> > http://netllama.ipfox.com
> > 
> >4:30pm  up 11 days,  6:23,  3 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.21, 0.32
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Linux-users mailing list - 
> http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at 
> the above URL.
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
<>

RE: Make errors

2002-04-10 Thread Brian Witowski

I checked out the link Tim posted.  It does indeed say 0.4.2 requires
KDE 3.  Now that we've established that everybody knows how to read...

I was in fact trying to build 0.4.2, however I was getting conflicting
information from a different source.  It clearly stated KDE 2.2.x.
http://apps.kde.com/uk/0/info/vid/5575?

Well, the upside is, my Qt is now upgraded to 3.x...

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Make errors
> 
> 
> Which version of kmyfirewall are you trying to build, 0.4.1 or 0.4.2?
> 
> Brian Witowski wrote:
> > I double-checked the requirements at sourceforge and KDE 2.2.0 is whats
> > required.  Let me know when you have some usefull input.
> > 
> > 
> >>The correct version of KDE would be a good start.  According to the 
> >>webpage for kmyfirewall the version that you're trying to build 
> requires 
> >>KDE3, with qt3.
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~
> L. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step:   
> http://netllama.ipfox.com
> 
>5:25pm  up 11 days,  7:18,  4 users,  load average: 0.24, 0.20, 0.14
> 
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Make errors

2002-04-09 Thread Brian Witowski

I double-checked the requirements at sourceforge and KDE 2.2.0 is whats
required.  Let me know when you have some usefull input.

> The correct version of KDE would be a good start.  According to the 
> webpage for kmyfirewall the version that you're trying to build requires 
> KDE3, with qt3.
> 
> -- 
> ~
> L. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step:   
http://netllama.ipfox.com

   4:30pm  up 11 days,  6:23,  3 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.21, 0.32


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Make errors

2002-04-09 Thread Brian Witowski

We must have been looking at two different web pages.  The spec's I read
called for KDE 2.2.x

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama!
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 7:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Make errors
> 
> 
> Brian Witowski wrote:
> > This is related to the issues I had with installing Qt 3.0.3.  
> I finally got
> > it to install.  I was missing some necessary switches.  It 
> installed without
> > error.
> > 
> > Now, the app I'm trying to install (kmyfirewall) is puking during make.
> > Here are the last few lines:
> > 
> > make[2]: *** [kmfruleeditip.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/kmyfirewall-0.4.2/kmyfirewall'
> > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/kmyfirewall-0.4.2'
> > make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
> > 
> > In addition there are other errors sprinkled in the output:
> > 
> > 
> > /opt/kde2/include/kmainwindow.h:94: base class `QMainWindow' 
> has incomplete
> > type
> > 
> > /usr/local/qt/include/qlineedit.h:193: parse error before `*'
> > 
> > /opt/kde2/include/kpopupmenu.h:97: base class `QPopupMenu' has 
> incomplete
> > type
> > In file included from kmyfirewall.h:27,
> >  from kmfruleedit.h:16,
> >  from kmfruleeditip.h:16,
> >  from kmfruleeditip.cpp:10:
> > 
> > I'm unclear as to what the [all-recursive] messages mean.
> > 
> > This program is supposed to run under kde 2.2.x, which is what 
> I'm using.
> > What should I be looking for?
> 
> The correct version of KDE would be a good start.  According to the 
> webpage for kmyfirewall the version that you're trying to build requires 
> KDE3, with qt3.
> 
> -- 
> ~
> L. Friedman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Linux Step-by-step:   
http://netllama.ipfox.com

   4:30pm  up 11 days,  6:23,  3 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.21, 0.32


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Make errors

2002-04-09 Thread Brian Witowski

This is related to the issues I had with installing Qt 3.0.3.  I finally got
it to install.  I was missing some necessary switches.  It installed without
error.

Now, the app I'm trying to install (kmyfirewall) is puking during make.
Here are the last few lines:

make[2]: *** [kmfruleeditip.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/kmyfirewall-0.4.2/kmyfirewall'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/kmyfirewall-0.4.2'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2

In addition there are other errors sprinkled in the output:


/opt/kde2/include/kmainwindow.h:94: base class `QMainWindow' has incomplete
type

/usr/local/qt/include/qlineedit.h:193: parse error before `*'

/opt/kde2/include/kpopupmenu.h:97: base class `QPopupMenu' has incomplete
type
In file included from kmyfirewall.h:27,
 from kmfruleedit.h:16,
 from kmfruleeditip.h:16,
 from kmfruleeditip.cpp:10:

I'm unclear as to what the [all-recursive] messages mean.

This program is supposed to run under kde 2.2.x, which is what I'm using.
What should I be looking for?

Brian


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: QT Install problems

2002-04-09 Thread Brian Witowski

I haven't seen all of this thread but thought I'd share some of the issues
I've had with installing QT 3.0.3.

Make ./configure went off without a hitch, as did Make.  But when I
attempted Make Install I got No rule to make target ../linux-g++/qmake.conf
needed by Makefile'

After looking in linux-g++, there was NO qmake.conf.

So I started from scratch.  But first I made a copy of qmake.conf.  Then
tried it again.  After doing a Make then Make Install I checked for
../linux-g++ and again the qmake.conf was gone.  So I put the copy back
there and tried it again.  Same thing, except the error message was the only
text in the qmake.conf file!  On a whim I did a make clean before doing a
make (maybe not a good idea.  I was willing to try anything).  Then I put
fresh copies of qmake.conf and qplatformdefs.h in ../linux-g++/ and then did
a make install once again.  This time it finished without error, although it
took hours, literally.  However when I attempted to install Kmyfirewall, it
errored out saying that Qt >= 3.0.2 ( library qt-mt) not found.

Thats where it is now.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Douglas J Hunley
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 6:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: QT Install problems
>
>
> On Tuesday 09 April 2002 07:43, Keith Antoine wrote:
> > I do not know how they make an rpm of qt but you will find that
> there is no
> > way to make install. It is supposed to be compiled to
> /xxx/xxx/kde3 with a
> > ./configure --prefix=/usr/lib/kde3 and a make is all thats required so
> > checkinstall will bomb out.
>
> you can run 'checkinstall make' and create an rpm that way.
> according to the
> docs (and the Makefile) there is a 'make install' step. damned if
> I can get
> to work though..
> --
> Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
> Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org
>   and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org
>
> A day without sunshine is like... night.
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



QT Install problems

2002-04-07 Thread Brian Witowski

I'm trying to install QT 3.0.3 from qt-x11-free-3.0.3.tar.gz.  It compiles
fine.  Takes forever but it finishes successfully.  But when I do a 'make
install', I get this
-
[root@server qt]# make install
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/qt'
cd qmake && make
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/qt/qmake'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/qt/qmake'
cd qmake && make install
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/qt/qmake'
[ -d /usr/local/qt/bin ] || mkdir -p /usr/local/qt/bin
cp -f /usr/local/qt/bin/qmake /usr/local/qt/bin
cp: /usr/local/qt/bin/qmake: No such file or directory
make[2]: [install] Error 1 (ignored)
[ -d /usr/local/qt ] || mkdir -p /usr/local/qt
cp -r -f /usr/local/qt/mkspecs /usr/local/qt
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/qt/qmake'
cd src/moc && make
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/qt/src/moc'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/local/qt/mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf', needed by `Makefile'.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/qt/src/moc'
make[1]: *** [src-moc] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/qt'
make: *** [install] Error 2


As near as I can tell it's looking for a qmake.conf file in ../linux-g++/.
I looked and the file isn't there.  When it was compiling I saw references
to that file and it appeared that it existed and all was fine.  I need QT to
install kfirewall.  Anybody have any ideas what's going on?

Thanks,
Brian


BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



solved ndc dumpdb problem

2002-04-06 Thread Brian Witowski

For some reason this command wasn't dumping the bind cache, although I
proved it was caching.  I ran ndc stop then ndc start while working on an
unrelated issue, then on a whim I did ndc dumpdb and it worked.

The strange thing is, I have restarted the server numerous times since the
problem surfaced.  Anyway, now it works.  Thought I'd share that.


Brian


BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



Bind and ndc dumpdb

2002-03-25 Thread Brian Witowski

Straight to the point, it doesn't dump to the file specefied in the config
file.  In fact it doesn't dump anywhere that I can tell.  Logs just say
"dumping database" or a simile thereof.  I have tried different permissions
on the file (named_dump.db) but it doesn't matter.  I have also tested to
see if the box is acutally resolving names using dig.  The first time I do a
'dig' there's about 250ms delay.  The second time there's maybe a few ms.
And it says its getting it from my server.  So I believe its caching.

Any ideas?

Brian


BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Witowski;Brian
FN:Brian Witowski
ORG:Pyramid Computer Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(231) 331-6090
TEL;CELL;VOICE:(231) 409-9541
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020324T171728Z
END:VCARD



RE: Log Errors

2002-03-22 Thread Brian Witowski

Yea, you're probably right.  Why would they put sound options under "Sound".
Thats too obvious.  Sheesh.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Andrew
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Log Errors
>
>
>
> From: "Brian Witowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > One more note, I'm using grub, not lilo.
>
> uname -r will determine if you've configured grub correctly in context to
> the kernel you think you've booted. Bottom line is that you missed a few
> non-obvious options on the kernel compile.
>
>
>
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Active-Filter option in pppd

2002-03-22 Thread Brian Witowski



I have looked high 
and low for an example of the syntax to use this in my /etc/ppp/options 
file.  I have seen references to tcpdump, but that doesn't help because I 
don't know how to use that either.
 
My problem is I have 
fetchmail checking mail every 5 minutes.  However, it keeps my connection 
alive when nobody is using a workstation.  I would like to filter smb 
packets as well as pop3 and smtp ports.  In other words, it would only run 
fetchmail when there are active internet users.
 
 
Thanks,
Brian


RE: Log Errors

2002-03-21 Thread Brian Witowski

One more note, I'm using grub, not lilo.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Andrew
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 12:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Log Errors
>
>
> > --- Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Where is it determined that it would be looking in
> > > /lib/modules/2.4.2...
>
> From: "Net Llama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Well, Caldera has an ass-backwards modutils, which i believe looks in
> > /etc/modules/default
>
> I've been following this thread. It would seem to me that you are not
> booting the kernel you think you are, OR, you never booted the
> (new) kernel
> that you previously thought you did. And the answer is really simple, you
> did some minor thing to make things different just a few days
> ago, only you
> can't (obviously) see the connection between the events because you're
> assuming, quite wrongly as it turns out, that the compile went
> 'ok', it did
> not, and ama hit the target first time because all messages
> about unable
> to find a heap of char major anythings are kernel miscompiles. More
> correctly: it's symptomatic of not including some kernel options in an
> otherwise good compile.
>
> first thing to do is
>
> uname -r
>
> this will tell you unreservedly THE kernel you have currently booted.
> Chances are high that you have a misconfigured lilo.conf (not
> having a shot
> at you, am covering some non-obvious bases).
>
> To answer your above question, kernd (the kernel module daemon within the
> kernel) passes requests to modprobe to find it's modules. It is modprobe
> which determines which /lib/path to use. It is fixed in concrete that it
> will be /lib/modules/, unless specifically over-ridden
> (as likely
> as hell freezing over).
>
> Caldera's /etc/modules is chalk and cheese, /etc/modules/ is
> simply a (very
> sensible) method of supplying a one-stop shop for ALL modules to be loaded
> at boot time, it is a look-up list written against Caldera's
> version of the
> /etc/rc.d/sysinit scripts, not _the_ modules, and is agnostic to kernel
> versions (again, unless hell freezes over, Col 2.2 is version
> sensitive, the
> others are not).
>
> Using poetic licence, the actual modules created are derived from
> /usr/src/linux//modules. This directory is created on
> the fly from
> /usr/src/linux//drivers during compile time (and destroyed at
> 'make modules" incantation).
>
> 'make modules_install' copies these binaries to the correct
> /lib/modules/ path and then runs a fudged depmod -a to
> correctly sync this stuff. That bit has never worked as advertised for
> reasons no-one has ever been able to explain to me. As a result,
> all distros
> I am aware of run a hidden depmod -a at boot time. Each distro
> hides this in
> a different way, but the end result is identical, depmod (the modprobe
> generator) _guarantees_ that the modules the booted kernel wants, are
> indexed correctly. 'Correctly' means depmod is going to scream
> blue murder,
> at boot time, if it can't find THE location of _the_ kernel
> version modules.
> That doesn't mean all modules are 'ok' it means it can find them. So to
> answer a question you were thinking, there is no way on the planet that
> kernel-2.4.18 will use anything other than /lib/modules/2.4.18.
> And contra,
> no way on earth kernel 2.4.10 will use 2.4.18 compiled modules (There are
> if's and but's to that statement, but you can take it at face value).
>
> As far as deleting /usr/src/anything, the answer is: irrelevant to the
> problem. /usr/src/linux is not used at any time by the kernel or it's
> friends. It is simply a convenient hole in the ground to compile,
> well gee,
> user / source. Anything required from /usr/src/ is, as stated
> above, copied
> out of there, in the expectation that you will indeed delete /usr/src at
> some future date.
>
> To get back to Lama's original reply, he is spot on. You don't
> in fact have an issue with any of the above, it will all work as
> advertised
> and you aint gone done broken it. The truth is,  you've missed out a few
> options on the compile. See the SxS which contains fairly bullet proof gif
> images of each dialog box during 'make xconfig', or, use Keith's equally
> good text based version.
>
>
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Log Errors

2002-03-21 Thread Brian Witowski

Mike,

Thanks for that explanation!  Most of the docs out there tell you what to do
and when to do it but they don't tell you why!  I need to know the 'nuts and
bolts'.  Once I know that, I can fix anything myself.

I am indeed running 2.4.18.  I recompiled my kernel last night and went
through xconfig slowly and deliberately.  And guess what?  Even though I
didn't compile in sound, I was getting a char-major-14 error in my logs.  I
read at another site on the web that even though sound isn't compiled in, it
will generate those errors if an application attempts to use sound.   It
also advised putting 'alias char-major-14 off' in my modules.conf file to
stop the error from appearing in my logs.

Now that is something nobody else ever suggested.  An app would try to use
sound, which would in turn try to load a module that didn't exist and thus
create an error.  The end result being there is nothing wrong with my kernel
or the way I compiled it.  That of course doesn't explain all of the errors
(the rtc thing was my fault) but it does suggest we shouldn't jump to
'compile errors' as a first resort.

Thanks again for your detailed explanation.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Andrew
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 12:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Log Errors
>
>
> > --- Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Where is it determined that it would be looking in
> > > /lib/modules/2.4.2...
>
> From: "Net Llama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Well, Caldera has an ass-backwards modutils, which i believe looks in
> > /etc/modules/default
>
> I've been following this thread. It would seem to me that you are not
> booting the kernel you think you are, OR, you never booted the
> (new) kernel
> that you previously thought you did. And the answer is really simple, you
> did some minor thing to make things different just a few days
> ago, only you
> can't (obviously) see the connection between the events because you're
> assuming, quite wrongly as it turns out, that the compile went
> 'ok', it did
> not, and ama hit the target first time because all messages
> about unable
> to find a heap of char major anythings are kernel miscompiles. More
> correctly: it's symptomatic of not including some kernel options in an
> otherwise good compile.
>
> first thing to do is
>
> uname -r
>
> this will tell you unreservedly THE kernel you have currently booted.
> Chances are high that you have a misconfigured lilo.conf (not
> having a shot
> at you, am covering some non-obvious bases).
>
> To answer your above question, kernd (the kernel module daemon within the
> kernel) passes requests to modprobe to find it's modules. It is modprobe
> which determines which /lib/path to use. It is fixed in concrete that it
> will be /lib/modules/, unless specifically over-ridden
> (as likely
> as hell freezing over).
>
> Caldera's /etc/modules is chalk and cheese, /etc/modules/ is
> simply a (very
> sensible) method of supplying a one-stop shop for ALL modules to be loaded
> at boot time, it is a look-up list written against Caldera's
> version of the
> /etc/rc.d/sysinit scripts, not _the_ modules, and is agnostic to kernel
> versions (again, unless hell freezes over, Col 2.2 is version
> sensitive, the
> others are not).
>
> Using poetic licence, the actual modules created are derived from
> /usr/src/linux//modules. This directory is created on
> the fly from
> /usr/src/linux//drivers during compile time (and destroyed at
> 'make modules" incantation).
>
> 'make modules_install' copies these binaries to the correct
> /lib/modules/ path and then runs a fudged depmod -a to
> correctly sync this stuff. That bit has never worked as advertised for
> reasons no-one has ever been able to explain to me. As a result,
> all distros
> I am aware of run a hidden depmod -a at boot time. Each distro
> hides this in
> a different way, but the end result is identical, depmod (the modprobe
> generator) _guarantees_ that the modules the booted kernel wants, are
> indexed correctly. 'Correctly' means depmod is going to scream
> blue murder,
> at boot time, if it can't find THE location of _the_ kernel
> version modules.
> That doesn't mean all modules are 'ok' it means it can find them. So to
> answer a question you were thinking, there is no way on the planet that
> kernel-2.4.18 will use anything other than /lib/modules/2.4.18.
> And contra,
> no way on earth kernel 2.4.10 will use 2.4.18 compiled modules (There are
> if's a

RE: Log Errors

2002-03-19 Thread Brian Witowski

Ill try it...

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Wunder
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Log Errors
> 
> 
> Could fixing this be as simple as executing
> depmod -ae
> ??
> 
> Tim
> 
> Net Llama wrote:
> > Well, Caldera has an ass-backwards modutils, which i believe looks in
> > /etc/modules/default
> > Did you grab a new copy of modutils?
> > 
> > --- Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> >>Yes, I had rebooted.  And the only thing I did that I can think of is
> >>I
> >>deleted my /usr/src/linux-2.4.2 directory because I had upgraded my
> >>kernel
> >>to 2.4.18.
> >>
> >>Where is it determined that it would be looking in
> >>/lib/modules/2.4.2...
> >>rather that /lib/modules/2.4.18?  Are the modules placed in the
> >>modules
> >>directory at compile time?  I checked my logs for yesterday and the
> >>only
> >>error was the rtc.o error.
> >>
> >>I'm still trying to get a handle on how the various directories are
> >>created
> >>and how the various files are called.  Once I have a firm
> >>understanding of
> >>that, it will be easier to troubleshoot myself.
> >>
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Brian
> >>
> >>
> >>>What did you do as root on March 16?  Had you rebooted between when
> >>
> >>you
> >>
> >>>built the kernel & March 16?
> >>>
> >>
> >> > Mar 16 10:06:21 server insmod:
> >> > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o: insmod
> >> > block-major-8
> >> > failed
> >>
> >> > Those are SCSI drives (sda etc).
> >>
> >>
> >>>Mar 16 10:06:22 server last message repeated 15 times
> >>>Mar 16 20:34:17 server insmod:
> >>
> >> > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/sound/soundcore.o: insmod
> >>
> >>>char-major-14
> >>>failed
> >>
> >>>Sound devices (/dev/mixer etc)
> >>
> >>>Mar 18 09:41:02 server insmod:
> >>>/lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/char/rtc.o: insmod
> >>>char-major-10-135
> >>>failed
> >>
> > 
> > =
> > 
> > Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Linux Step-by-step help:   http://netllama.ipfox.com
> > 
> >  .
> > 
> > __
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> > http://sports.yahoo.com/
> > ___
> > Linux-users mailing list - 
> http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at 
> the above URL.
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Log Errors

2002-03-19 Thread Brian Witowski

Yes, and it's installed.

brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Log Errors
> 
> 
> Well, Caldera has an ass-backwards modutils, which i believe looks in
> /etc/modules/default
> Did you grab a new copy of modutils?
> 
> --- Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I had rebooted.  And the only thing I did that I can think of is
> > I
> > deleted my /usr/src/linux-2.4.2 directory because I had upgraded my
> > kernel
> > to 2.4.18.
> > 
> > Where is it determined that it would be looking in
> > /lib/modules/2.4.2...
> > rather that /lib/modules/2.4.18?  Are the modules placed in the
> > modules
> > directory at compile time?  I checked my logs for yesterday and the
> > only
> > error was the rtc.o error.
> > 
> > I'm still trying to get a handle on how the various directories are
> > created
> > and how the various files are called.  Once I have a firm
> > understanding of
> > that, it will be easier to troubleshoot myself.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Brian
> > 
> > >
> > > What did you do as root on March 16?  Had you rebooted between when
> > you
> > > built the kernel & March 16?
> > >
> >  > Mar 16 10:06:21 server insmod:
> >  > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o: insmod
> >  > block-major-8
> >  > failed
> > 
> >  > Those are SCSI drives (sda etc).
> > 
> > > Mar 16 10:06:22 server last message repeated 15 times
> > > Mar 16 20:34:17 server insmod:
> >  > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/sound/soundcore.o: insmod
> > > char-major-14
> > > failed
> > 
> > > Sound devices (/dev/mixer etc)
> > 
> > > Mar 18 09:41:02 server insmod:
> > > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/char/rtc.o: insmod
> > > char-major-10-135
> > > failed
> 
> =
> 
> Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Linux Step-by-step help:   http://netllama.ipfox.com
> 
>  .
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> http://sports.yahoo.com/
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Log Errors

2002-03-19 Thread Brian Witowski

Yes, I had rebooted.  And the only thing I did that I can think of is I
deleted my /usr/src/linux-2.4.2 directory because I had upgraded my kernel
to 2.4.18.

Where is it determined that it would be looking in /lib/modules/2.4.2...
rather that /lib/modules/2.4.18?  Are the modules placed in the modules
directory at compile time?  I checked my logs for yesterday and the only
error was the rtc.o error.

I'm still trying to get a handle on how the various directories are created
and how the various files are called.  Once I have a firm understanding of
that, it will be easier to troubleshoot myself.


Thanks,
Brian

>
> What did you do as root on March 16?  Had you rebooted between when you
> built the kernel & March 16?
>
 > Mar 16 10:06:21 server insmod:
 > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o: insmod
 > block-major-8
 > failed

 > Those are SCSI drives (sda etc).

> Mar 16 10:06:22 server last message repeated 15 times
> Mar 16 20:34:17 server insmod:
 > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/sound/soundcore.o: insmod
> char-major-14
> failed

> Sound devices (/dev/mixer etc)

> Mar 18 09:41:02 server insmod:
> /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/char/rtc.o: insmod
> char-major-10-135
> failed


___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Log Errors

2002-03-18 Thread Brian Witowski

What you're saying makes sense except I built the new kernel about a week
ago or more and these errors only show up on March 16.  In addition to the
kernel itself and modules.conf, where eles could modules be called from?

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Log Errors
>
>
> --- Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am getting the following errors in my logs.  As near as I can tell,
> > I
> > didn't have these until I upgraded to the latest modutils module:
> >
> > Mar 16 10:06:21 server modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
> > block-major-33
> > Mar 16 10:06:21 server modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
> > block-major-33
>
> That's the 3rd IDE channel (hde/hdf).  Do you have 3 IDE channels?
>
> > Mar 16 10:06:21 server modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
> > block-major-34
> > Mar 16 10:06:21 server modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
> > block-major-34
>
> That's the 4th IDE channel.  Sounds like you built something into the
> kernel that you shouldn't have.
>
> > Mar 16 10:06:21 server insmod:
> > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o: insmod
> > block-major-8
> > failed
>
> Those are SCSI drives (sda etc).
>
> > Mar 16 10:06:22 server last message repeated 15 times
> > Mar 16 20:34:17 server insmod:
> > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/sound/soundcore.o: insmod
> > char-major-14
> > failed
>
> Sound devices (/dev/mixer etc)
>
> > Mar 18 09:41:02 server insmod:
> > /lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/char/rtc.o: insmod
> > char-major-10-135
> > failed
>
> /dev/rtc - Real time clock support, which you didn't built properly, i'm
> guessing.
>
> >
> > These are not necessarily in sequence.  Here is my modules.conf file:
> > Note that I don't use sound nor SCSI.  I would like to remedy these
> > errors.
>
> Considering how about 50% of the lines are commented out, why don't you
> remove them altogether?  Also, just because you don't use sound or SCSI,
> doesn't mean that you didn't say Y to stuff that requires them in the
> kernel config.
>
> =
> 
> Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Linux Step-by-step help:   http://netllama.ipfox.com
>
>  .
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> http://sports.yahoo.com/
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Log Errors

2002-03-18 Thread Brian Witowski

Hello,

I am getting the following errors in my logs.  As near as I can tell, I
didn't have these until I upgraded to the latest modutils module:

Mar 16 10:06:21 server modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
block-major-33
Mar 16 10:06:21 server modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
block-major-33
Mar 16 10:06:21 server modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
block-major-34
Mar 16 10:06:21 server modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
block-major-34
Mar 16 10:06:21 server insmod:
/lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o: insmod block-major-8
failed
Mar 16 10:06:22 server last message repeated 15 times
Mar 16 20:34:17 server insmod:
/lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/sound/soundcore.o: insmod char-major-14
failed
Mar 18 09:41:02 server insmod:
/lib/modules//2.4.2/kernel/drivers/char/rtc.o: insmod char-major-10-135
failed

These are not necessarily in sequence.  Here is my modules.conf file:
Note that I don't use sound nor SCSI.  I would like to remedy these errors.

Thanks,
Brian


keep

#alias usb-..01.00.00  audio.o
alias usb-..03.01.00  mouse.o

alias tap0 ethertap
options tap0 -o tap0 unit=0
alias tap1 ethertap
options tap1 -o tap1 unit=1

alias char-major-108ppp_generic
alias tty-ldisc-3   ppp_async
#alias ppp-compress-21  bsd_comp
alias ppp-compress-24   ppp_deflate
alias ppp-compress-26   ppp_deflate

alias parport_lowlevel  parport_pc
# If you have multiple parallel ports, specify them this way:
# options parport_pc io=0x378,0x278  irq=none,none

#alias char-major-107   3dfx
#alias char-major-195   NVdriver

# bttv:
#post-install bttv modprobe tuner; modprobe msp3400 ;
#modprobe saa5249

# irda:
#alias tty-ldisc-11 irtty
#alias char-major-60ircomm_tty

# I810 graphics:
alias char-major-10-175 agpgart

# consider disabling this if you have less than 32MB of memory
# options sound dmabuf=1
---

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: POP before SMTP

2002-03-18 Thread Brian Witowski

Be careful how you set it up.  If you want it to sign your messages with a
particular domain, keep in mind if it is NOT a valid, registered domain,
like mine isn't, and the recipient does a reply, it will get bounced.  When
email is sent, the DNS servers look at the domain portion and ignore the
username portion.  It then does the equivalent of an nslookup with type set
to MX to find the recipient mail server.  Your domain needs to be registered
with appropriate MX and ETRN records.

In my case, I send using my own sendmail, but for receiving I use fetchmail.
In addition, for internal email addresses I use Address Mapping (virtuser).
This redirects specific email addresses to internal POP3 linux accounts, so
it never leaves my network.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Day
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 8:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: POP before SMTP
>
>
> as in?   I still havent quite got SMTP with sendmail working, if
> I use my ISP
> smtp instead of sendamil all goes fine.. or if I use sendmail vs
> ISP smtp I
> cant post to this group  sendmail doesnt seem to want to sign my messages
> with the correct domain yet...
>
>
>
> On Sunday 17 March 2002 20:28, you were heard blurting out:
> > Anyone have any good notes/sources/etc on getting pop before
> SMTP to work
> > with Sendmail? Like to offer it to some people.. thanks!
>
> --
>   Bill Day
>
>   Linux for Windows Addicts:
>   A Twelve Step Program for Habitual Windows Users.
>   ISBN: 0072130814
>
>   Get it cause Ol' Billy Gates don't want you too!
>
>   8:30pm  up  7:18,  3 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Cannot find system map file

2002-03-11 Thread Brian Witowski

One last question; would I be save to just install the patch from kernel.org
utilizing the 'patch' command?

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 10:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Cannot find system map file
>
>
> That's not too hairy of an upgrade.  Just read the requirements in
> /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes, and follow the instructions on the
> SxS, and you'll be fine.
>
> --- Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, I will do that.  BTW, my kernel is 2.4.2.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Brian
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Andrew
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 7:34 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Cannot find system map file
> > >
> > >
> > > Net Llama wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > If I were you, i'd spend my time building 2.4.17 or 2.4.18.
> > >
> > > me too, but he's on a very old 2.2 kernel? and consequently needs
> > > to do quite a
> > > bit more than simply compile a kernel (pppd, mod utils eg).
> > > *Defintiely* the best
> > > course, but a big leap.
> > >
> > > Brian, if you can't find the System.map doing a 'locate' then you
> > haven't
> > > installed the kernel source-devel packages from your COL cd. This
> > > (hopefully)
> > > will solve your immediate problem.
>
> =
> 
> Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Linux Step-by-step help:   http://netllama.ipfox.com
>
>  .
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Cannot find system map file

2002-03-10 Thread Brian Witowski

Ok, I will do that.  BTW, my kernel is 2.4.2.

Regards,
Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Andrew
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 7:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cannot find system map file
> 
> 
> Net Llama wrote:
> 
> >
> > If I were you, i'd spend my time building 2.4.17 or 2.4.18.
> 
> me too, but he's on a very old 2.2 kernel? and consequently needs 
> to do quite a
> bit more than simply compile a kernel (pppd, mod utils eg). 
> *Defintiely* the best
> course, but a big leap.
> 
> Brian, if you can't find the System.map doing a 'locate' then you haven't
> installed the kernel source-devel packages from your COL cd. This 
> (hopefully)
> will solve your immediate problem.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Cannot find system map file

2002-03-10 Thread Brian Witowski

The problem is the file doesn't exist in either of those locations.
Strange.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Andrew
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 12:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cannot find system map file
>
>
> Jerry McBride wrote:
>
> >
> > It's not required for running your linux computer. However, it will shut
> > up that error message.
> >
>
> It is, afaik, only used during kernel oops tracing.
>
> Someone recently gave an *excellent* description of the various
> System.map's,
> plural, their order of precedence, and where the kernel would
> look for them. It
> will be in the archives. However, a good quick'n dirty to get over this
> continuing irritation is to simply
>
> cd /boot
> rm System.map
> ln -s /usr/src/linux/System.map System.map
>
> This presupposes that any kernels you build will be at the above
> location. The
> rev level being irrelevant.
>
>
>
>
> _
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Cannot find system map file

2002-03-10 Thread Brian Witowski

Ok, I have never recompiled my kernel.  If that file was created when I
initially installed COL, then it's gone now.  Is there a way to recompile my
kernel, exactly as it is now, without changing anything?  I would like to
get rid of that error message but don't want to risk waxing things.  This
box is my internet gateway/domain controller/file server.


Thanks,
Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerry McBride
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 12:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cannot find system map file
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 10:16:26 -0500 Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I get this message in my log file.  I have check the link and the file
> > pointed to doesn't exist.  I never poke around that directory so I think
> > it's unlikely that I deleted it.  The system runs normally in every
> > other respect.  Is it necessary?
>
> It's not required for running your linux computer. However, it will shut
> up that error message.
>
> >How can I recreate the file?
> >
>
> If you've been compiling kernerls, look in /usr/src/linux/System.map
>
>
> **
> * Registered Linux User Number 185956
>   http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
> 12:03pm  up 13 days, 23:45,  4 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



RE: Cannot find system map file

2002-03-10 Thread Brian Witowski

I have looked in both of those places and it's not there.  I've also done a
complete search of the system and can't find it anywhere.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anita Lewis
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 11:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cannot find system map file
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 10:16:26 -0500, Brian Witowski wrote:
> >
> > I get this message in my log file.  I have check the link and the file
> > pointed to doesn't exist.  I never poke around that directory so I think
> > it's unlikely that I deleted it.  The system runs normally in
> every other
> > respect.  Is it necessary?  How can I recreate the file?
> >
> > Brian
>
> If you compiled your kernel, then it will be in /usr/src/linux.  Otherwise
> it should be in /boot from the installation.  When you recompile
> the kernel
> you need to copy both the kernel and the System.map to /boot.
>
> Anita
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



Cannot find system map file

2002-03-10 Thread Brian Witowski



I get this message 
in my log file.  I have check the link and the file pointed to doesn't 
exist.  I never poke around that directory so I think it's unlikely that I 
deleted it.  The system runs normally in every other respect.  Is it 
necessary?  How can I recreate the file?
 
Brian


X-session on Windows was: SOLVED! Re: SOS! my LInux box is self destructing! (long)

2002-03-10 Thread Brian Witowski

Thanks.  I'll check it out.

Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Wunder
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 10:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SOLVED! Re: SOS! my LInux box is self destructing! (long)
> 
> 
> Previously, Brian Witowski chose to write:
> > Glad to hear you got it.  Its a scary deal, to say the least.  
> One lesson
> > I have learned when working with linux is that when things wig 
> out, look at
> > what's NOT running as much as what is.  This is generally ass-backwards
> > from the Windows mentality.  On more than one occassion I've 
> fought with my
> > system trying to figure out which module or daemon was causing problems
> > when in reality my problems were caused by scripts either not being
> > executable
> > or not having the proper ownership bits set.
> >
> > BTW, I would like to run an X session on my Windows box.  What does it
> > entail?
> >
> >
> 
> Cygwin is your answer.
> IIRC there were instructions on the lycoris community web site 
> pertaining to 
> using Cygwin to do that. Check out http://www.lycoris.org.
> Also check the Cygwin site.
> 
> HTH, 
> Tim
> 
> -- 
> Caldera eWorkstation 3.1, kernel 2.4.9, KDE 2.2.1, Xfree86 4.1.0
>  12:00pm  up 11 days, 13:47,  8 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
> It's what you learn AFTER you know it all that counts
> 
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.



bind question

2002-03-09 Thread Brian Witowski



Hi,
 
I'm running a bind 
caching server.  The problem is when I do an ndc dumpdb then check the dump 
file, it's empty.  Is there a step-by-step way I can verify that I am 
properly caching dns resloves?  My windows box points to my COL server for 
name resolution and it works fine.  But I don't know if it's caching.  
One test I have done is something like 'dig www.website.com'.  The first time I run 
it, it might take a second or two, but the second time it only take between 180 
and 255ms.  But I don't know if that tells me what I need to know.  
Any help would be appreciated.
 
 
Brian


RE: SOLVED! Re: SOS! my LInux box is self destructing! (long)

2002-03-09 Thread Brian Witowski

Glad to hear you got it.  Its a scary deal, to say the least.  One lesson
I have learned when working with linux is that when things wig out, look at
what's NOT running as much as what is.  This is generally ass-backwards
from the Windows mentality.  On more than one occassion I've fought with my
system trying to figure out which module or daemon was causing problems
when in reality my problems were caused by scripts either not being
executable
or not having the proper ownership bits set.

BTW, I would like to run an X session on my Windows box.  What does it
entail?


Brian

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 6:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: SxS
> Subject: SOLVED! Re: SOS! my LInux box is self destructing! (long)
>
>
> OK, chalk this one up to being an idiot...yet again.  Seems that when i
> was tinkering with /etc/inittab i put some innocent little hash marks in
> front of the lines that specified what runlevels 4, 5 & 6 were.  So,
> that's why Linux never ran any of the init scripts for those runlevels,
> which caused all of the crazy weirdness.   Hash marks removed, and life
> is good again.  Now, to wipe some of this egg off my face.
>
> --- Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Mar 2002 12:50:39 -0800 (PST)
> > Net Llama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration:
> >
> > >I've gotten myself into one hell of a mess, and i'm dumbfounded on
> > how
> > >to fix it.
> > >Last night, I configured my COL-3.1.1 box to provide remote X logins
> > >using kdm, as per these instructions:
> > >http://sxs.sourceforge.net/sxs/remotexkdm.html
> > >
> > >Everything was working perfectly.
> > 
> > Any chance you were rootkit'd last night while setting that up??  If
> > you
> > were connected for a while, even via 56K, I suppose it would have been
> > possilbe, no?? Mike
>
> =
> 
> Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Linux Step-by-step help:   http://netllama.ipfox.com
>
>  .
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
>

___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.