RE: [Lucene.Net] Comparing APIs of two DLLs (something like Clirr for .NET)?

[Prescott Nasser]

I have heard people use http://www.bitwidgets.com/ to success. I have not used 
it myself though.


> From: bode...@apache.org
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 06:05:01 +0200
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] Comparing APIs of two DLLs (something like Clirr for 
> .NET)?
>
> Hi,
>
> this is not about Lucene.NET even though it might be useful here as
> well.
>
> Over in log4net land we are trying to get our act together and finally
> do a new release.
>
> Given that many years have passed and the people active now haven't been
> around all the time we are looking for a tool that compares the public
> APIs of two assemblies so we can be sure we don't break any of the
> existing APIs of the last release.
>
> In a Java project I'd use Clirr[1], does anybody know a similar tool for
> .NET assemblies?
>
> Stefan
>
> [1] http://clirr.sourceforge.net/   

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

[Stefan Bodewig]

On 2011-09-07, Michael Herndon wrote:

> Stefan Bodewig might still be away

He is back ;-)

> and I think we need his vote on the release when the time
> comes. (correct me, because I could be uber wrong).

For the release you need three +1s by Incubator PMC members.  After
voting here a second vote will happen on the general list where the
missing IPMC member votes can be collected.  Of course it will be easier
if the mentors (Benson, Gianugo and myself in this case) have already
voted.

Stefan

[Lucene.Net] Comparing APIs of two DLLs (something like Clirr for .NET)?

[Stefan Bodewig]

Hi,

this is not about Lucene.NET even though it might be useful here as
well.

Over in log4net land we are trying to get our act together and finally
do a new release.

Given that many years have passed and the people active now haven't been
around all the time we are looking for a tool that compares the public
APIs of two assemblies so we can be sure we don't break any of the
existing APIs of the last release.

In a Java project I'd use Clirr[1], does anybody know a similar tool for
.NET assemblies?

Stefan

[1] http://clirr.sourceforge.net/

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

[Stefan Bodewig]

On 2011-09-06, Michael Herndon wrote:

> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.

The one at git.apache.org is updated via commit hooks, see
.  Don't know about the one at
github either.

Stefan

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

[Michael Herndon]

Should we put together a quick release checklist ?

 * I know that jira 407 mentions putting out a 2.9.2 build that is signed
when releasing 2.9.4

 * We should be able to build a chm & doc website using sandcastle.The
downside is the website that gets built now requires asp.net instead of just
vanilla HTML and I have yet to find an option that allows just HTML.
Depending on what we do with this, we would need to remove the link to the
docs in the README file inside of trunk.

* Stefan Bodewig might still be away and I think we need his vote on the
release when the time comes. (correct me, because I could be uber wrong).

If there is anything that requires work and you think I can help with in
order to get this release out the door, just let me know.

- Michael



On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:

>
> Also +1 - but I don't mind waiting to hear back regarding the RavenDB stuff
> - but we can prepare assuming it's all good.
>
>
>
> Digy can you elaborate on 414 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414). I must not have
> understood the complaint/question as adding that one method to me doesn't
> seem to resolve the issue brought up
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~P
>
> 
> > From: digyd...@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0300
> > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > +1 for an official release.
> > DIGY
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> >
> >
> > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> > left to take care of?
> >
> >
> >
> > ~Prescott =
> > -
> > Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> > AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> > Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi:
> 05.09.2011
> >
>

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

[Itamar Syn-Hershko]

Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and will
let you know how it went.

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Michael Herndon  wrote:

> I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
> commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.  I'll
> check next time I push something to svn.
>
> But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
>
> - michael
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy  wrote:
>
> > I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> > These are the original locations
> > 2.9.4  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> > 2.9.4g
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> > 9_4g/
> >
> > Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > DIGY
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com]
> On
> > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
> > potential
> > memory leaks
> >
> > Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I
> > can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
> > signed patch applied to it?
> >
> > 2011/9/6 Digy 
> >
> > > To avoid misunderstanding...
> > >
> > > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> > >
> > > DIGY
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> > > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> > > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >
> > > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of
> testing
> > > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> > > DIGY
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> > >
> > > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at
> > how
> > > RavenDB uses it?
> > >
> > > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> > > )
> > > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
> > > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
> > >
> > > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hey All,
> > > >
> > > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready
> > to
> > > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
> > tasks
> > > > left to take care of?
> > > >
> > > > ~Prescott
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>

RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

[Prescott Nasser]

Also +1 - but I don't mind waiting to hear back regarding the RavenDB stuff - 
but we can prepare assuming it's all good.

 

Digy can you elaborate on 414 
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414). I must not have 
understood the complaint/question as adding that one method to me doesn't seem 
to resolve the issue brought up

 

Thanks,

~P


> From: digyd...@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0300
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> +1 for an official release.
> DIGY
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 9:22 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
>
> Hey All,
>
>
>
> How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some tasks
> left to take care of?
>
>
>
> ~Prescott =
> -
> Bu iletide virüs bulunamadı.
> AVG tarafından kontrol edildi - www.avg.com
> Sürüm: 2012.0.1796 / Virüs Veritabanı: 2082/4478 - Sürüm Tarihi: 05.09.2011
> 

Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

[Michael Herndon]

I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn.  I'll
check next time I push something to svn.

But both of those items have made it to the mirror.

- michael


On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy  wrote:

> I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
> These are the original locations
> 2.9.4  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/
> 2.9.4g
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
> 9_4g/
>
> Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.
>
> Thanks,
> DIGY
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for
> potential
> memory leaks
>
> Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I
> can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
> signed patch applied to it?
>
> 2011/9/6 Digy 
>
> > To avoid misunderstanding...
> >
> > Community==all Lucene.Net users
> >
> > DIGY
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> > To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
> > against all projects using Lucene.Net
> > DIGY
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
> >
> > If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at
> how
> > RavenDB uses it?
> >
> > At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
> >
> >
>
> https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> > )
> > but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
> > unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
> >
> > On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser 
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hey All,
> > >
> > > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready
> to
> > > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
> tasks
> > > left to take care of?
> > >
> > > ~Prescott
> >
>
>
>

RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

[Digy]

I don't know how often github mirror is updated.
These are the original locations 
2.9.4  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/ 
2.9.4g
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net_2_
9_4g/

Both versions include ThreadLocal fix + Signing.

Thanks,
DIGY



-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:34 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4

Not a problem, we will test RavenDB on a separate branch, also for potential
memory leaks

Digy, can you make sure the github mirror contains an updated 2.9.4 tag I
can pull from, which includes the latest ThreadLocal fix + the strongly
signed patch applied to it?

2011/9/6 Digy 

> To avoid misunderstanding...
>
> Community==all Lucene.Net users
>
> DIGY
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:46 PM
> To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> Not bad idea, but I would prefer community's feedback instead of testing
> against all projects using Lucene.Net
> DIGY
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Warren [mailto:mattd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 11:09 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
>
> If you want to test it against a large project you could take a look at
how
> RavenDB uses it?
>
> At the moment it's using 2.9.2 (
>
>
https://github.com/ayende/ravendb/tree/master/SharedLibs/Sources/Lucene2.9.2
> )
> but if you were to recompile it against 2.9.4 and check that all it's
> unit-tests still run that would give you quite a large test case.
>
> On 5 September 2011 19:22, Prescott Nasser  wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > How do people feel about the 2.9.4 code base? I've been using it for
> > sometime, for my use cases it's be excellent. Do we feel we are ready to
> > package this up and make it an official release? Or do we have some
tasks
> > left to take care of?
> >
> > ~Prescott
>