Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3
On 2011-11-20, Prescott Nasser wrote: > I've updated the files - same location Thanks a lot! Hashes and sigs are good. All required legal files are in place. src zip still matches the tag (so I didn't have to re-run RAT) +1 Stefan
RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Anyone have any thoughts on these items? My 2 cents is that after we get 2.9.4 out the door, we quickly release a 2.9.4g (Digy - you're probably most familiar with 2.9.4g, is there any work that we should do to that to get it solid for a release? I'm still unsure the status of 3.0.3 or 4.0, but I'm thinking for the next release in Q1 2012. > > > While you all take a look at the artifacts for a vote - I wanted to talk > about the future roadmap and our releases - > > > > 2.9.4g is very stable - do we want to release this at some point? > > 3.0.3 - chris looks to be pretty active on this. Chris, can you fill us in on > what's the status of this branch? > > 4.0 - looks to be partially underway. > > > > I want to try and maybe build a better release schedule and begin filling out > what needs to be done so people can easily jump in and help out. I noticed > the 4.0 status page in the wiki - that's excellent > > > > ~P
RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3
I've updated the files - same location ~P > From: bode...@apache.org > To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:34:16 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3 > > On 2011-11-18, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > > Third time is the charm: > > I'm afraid it is not. > > > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/ > > Sigs and hashes are good. Source zip and tag match except for the > build/lib/doc dirs that are only inside the tag and which I agree is a > good thing for now. > > LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER look good in src. > > There is no NOTICE and no DISCLAIMER in the binary zip. Has it been > this way before? If so I'm sorry I didn't catch it. This is a blocker > for me and probably would be for the other IPMC members as well. > > RAT is reasonably happy with the source tree. > > I can't give a +1 because of the missing files in the binary zip. If > you just recreated the binary with the two files added (and obviously > resigned it and recalculated the hashes) I'd be happy to change that. > > Cheers > > Stefan
RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3
I was just thinking about making some in depth documentation about this process. Doing it the first time has had its bumps. I'll get there. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Michael Herndon Sent: 11/19/2011 11:38 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3 +1 for wiki checklist & ticket for for build scripts to bundle all this stuff for you. On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > Damn It - knew i was missing something > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > From: Stefan Bodewig > Sent: 11/19/2011 10:34 PM > To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3 > > On 2011-11-18, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > > Third time is the charm: > > I'm afraid it is not. > > > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/ > > Sigs and hashes are good. Source zip and tag match except for the > build/lib/doc dirs that are only inside the tag and which I agree is a > good thing for now. > > LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER look good in src. > > There is no NOTICE and no DISCLAIMER in the binary zip. Has it been > this way before? If so I'm sorry I didn't catch it. This is a blocker > for me and probably would be for the other IPMC members as well. > > RAT is reasonably happy with the source tree. > > I can't give a +1 because of the missing files in the binary zip. If > you just recreated the binary with the two files added (and obviously > resigned it and recalculated the hashes) I'd be happy to change that. > > Cheers > >Stefan >
