Re: Re: translations, category
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012 um 09:45:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Richard Heck wrote: > > Sectioning sounds right to me. > > Kornel, can you do the change yourself? I will. > Jürgen Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: translations, category
Richard Heck wrote: > Sectioning sounds right to me. Kornel, can you do the change yourself? Jürgen
Re: translations, category
On 12/27/2012 12:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Kornel Benko wrote: "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the problem. OK, please. I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first. I'd be happy to give my opinion but I don't know anything about layouts so I would need some context here, or a reference to a LyX help section that I should read. Or we can wait for Richard. Sectioning sounds right to me. rh
Re: translations, category
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: >> > "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the >> > problem. >> >> OK, please. > > I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first. I'd be happy to give my opinion but I don't know anything about layouts so I would need some context here, or a reference to a LyX help section that I should read. Or we can wait for Richard. Scott
Re: translations, category
Kornel Benko wrote: > You mean inside some concrete layout-files? Yes. > I had in mind to define somewhere a category-priority, (may it be in > preferences, or some category-config.layout file) This way there would be > no change to existing layouts. In case of nothing defined, we may stick to > current behaviour. We do not have a fixed set of categories, though. Jürgen
Re: Re: translations, category
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 um 13:49:32, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the > > > problem. > > > > OK, please. > > I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first. According to LaTeX companion there are sectioning commands. So ... > > I missed this one. But the sorting here is only alphabetic (in the > > translated language) and only inside a category. (My wish was to sort > > categories) > > I see. This makes sense, but it is in the responsibility of the layout > maintainers. There might be arguments for different orders in different > classes. > > However, you can propose concrete changes and see if there are objections. You mean inside some concrete layout-files? I had in mind to define somewhere a category-priority, (may it be in preferences, or some category-config.layout file) This way there would be no change to existing layouts. In case of nothing defined, we may stick to current behaviour. > Jürgen > Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: translations, category
Kornel Benko wrote: > > "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the > > problem. > > OK, please. I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first. > I missed this one. But the sorting here is only alphabetic (in the > translated language) and only inside a category. (My wish was to sort > categories) I see. This makes sense, but it is in the responsibility of the layout maintainers. There might be arguments for different orders in different classes. However, you can propose concrete changes and see if there are objections. Jürgen > Kornel
Re: Re: translations, category
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 um 13:31:41, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Kornel Benko wrote: > > 1.) Could we please rename > > Category Section > > to > > Category Section[[structure]] > > > > That way we may translate it e.g. in German to "Gliederung" instead > > of "Abschnitt". > > "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the > problem. OK, please. > > 2.) The position of categories inside the available styles varies between > > different layouts. This takes getting used to. > > We could make it more consistent through some sort of sorting, or > > define the order like a.) everything without category > > b.) FrontMatter > > c.) Lists > > d.) Section[[structure]] > > e.) Unnumbered > > f.) BackMatter > > Note that the order in the layout determines the order in the combo. Since > you > can switch off ordering by category in the preferences, the order you propose > might not be the desired one in this case. I missed this one. But the sorting here is only alphabetic (in the translated language) and only inside a category. (My wish was to sort categories) > Jürgen > Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: translations, category
Kornel Benko wrote: > 1.) Could we please rename > Category Section > to > Category Section[[structure]] > > That way we may translate it e.g. in German to "Gliederung" instead > of "Abschnitt". "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the problem. > 2.) The position of categories inside the available styles varies between > different layouts. This takes getting used to. > We could make it more consistent through some sort of sorting, or > define the order like a.) everything without category > b.) FrontMatter > c.) Lists > d.) Section[[structure]] > e.) Unnumbered > f.) BackMatter Note that the order in the layout determines the order in the combo. Since you can switch off ordering by category in the preferences, the order you propose might not be the desired one in this case. Jürgen
