Re: MD: Carver Fire
Don Capps wrote: > Of course, perhaps the "golden ears" listen with their eyes. ;-) > > Don C. Around 1980 some genius had the brilliant idea that music needed some visual concept. The visuals did not have to have anything to do with the song and just watching musicians play the music was not enough. So someone came out with MTV. That was the end of music becoming popular because it was a good song. Now you heard the song (which may have sucked) but in you mind were these chicks wearing as little as they could get away with and of course they were near perfect 10's. Suddenly you had a hit. What does the M in MTV sand for. Because it certainly doesn't mean music. Maybe muscle or meat. Macho?? Mammary?? Larry - To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MD: Carver Fire
From: "J. Coon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > That is the way it works in conventional physics. That is how a hot air balloon rises, it is part of what makes the wind blow. However, in the field of audiophidialia, things are reversed. Usually based on the latest issue of some magazine. That is why you can easily tell the difference between different brands of minidisc blanks. The more expensive ones always sound the best. So put away your intellect, what you were taught in elementary school, high school physics and even what you learned at an institution of higher learning. What the heck do the learned professors know any way? Just go visit you local audio store and swallow the hook line and sinker the salesman has for you and remember that "He has a HIGH SCHOOL diploma",... and he gets a commission. Heheheheheh. A man after my own heart Jimbo! You know snake oil when you see it. My motto? "If it disappears when the blindfold goes on, then it doesn't exist." Of course, perhaps the "golden ears" listen with their eyes. ;-) Don C. - To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MD: Carver Fire
That is the way it works in conventional physics. That is how a hot air balloon rises, it is part of what makes the wind blow. However, in the field of audiophidialia, things are reversed. Usually based on the latest issue of some magazine. That is why you can easily tell the difference between different brands of minidisc blanks. The more expensive ones always sound the best. So put away your intellect, what you were taught in elementary school, high school physics and even what you learned at an institution of higher learning. What the heck do the learned professors know any way? Just go visit you local audio store and swallow the hook line and sinker the salesman has for you and remember that "He has a HIGH SCHOOL diploma",... and he gets a commission. ROFL, and looking for my flash suit with eye protection, flame resistant hood, jacket and bib overhauls. Alan Dowds wrote: > > I though air got thinner (less dense) when it gets warm. > -- Jim Coon Not just another pretty mandolin picker. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet? My first web page http://www.tir.com/~liteways - To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MD: Carver Fire
I though air got thinner (less dense) when it gets warm. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2001 00:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MD: Carver Fire Why would a stereo sound better with the fireplace lit? I suspect this has nothing to do with the crackling sound of a fire. ( just fry your speakers and you'll get all the crackle you want) :-) But it has everything to do with the room temperature. This sound improvement is very plausable, as the room gets warmer, the air thickens, and higher frequencies tend to sound warmer as well. Try this in your cold car...turn your stereo up when the car is cold and listen to a track. Turn the stereo off and allow the heater to warm up the car and play the same track/ same volume. It will sound noticably better. Are you sure Carver was not adding " fireplace EQ" which would simulate the audio tone of a warm room? Seems more plausable than adding sounds of a crackling fire! If I heard such a thing I'd pull the plug out of the wall and call 911! :-)Mark Dottle - To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MD: Carver Fire
No. It had nothing to do with the temperature of the room. It had to do with so some that is in the background when a fireplace is on. I read about this system some time ago. Evidently the "improvement" in sound was not shared by audiophiles since we don't hear anything about it today. Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why would a stereo sound better with the fireplace lit? I suspect this > has nothing to do with the crackling sound of a fire. - To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MD: Carver Fire
Why would a stereo sound better with the fireplace lit? I suspect this has nothing to do with the crackling sound of a fire. ( just fry your speakers and you'll get all the crackle you want) :-) But it has everything to do with the room temperature. This sound improvement is very plausable, as the room gets warmer, the air thickens, and higher frequencies tend to sound warmer as well. Try this in your cold car...turn your stereo up when the car is cold and listen to a track. Turn the stereo off and allow the heater to warm up the car and play the same track/ same volume. It will sound noticably better. Are you sure Carver was not adding " fireplace EQ" which would simulate the audio tone of a warm room? Seems more plausable than adding sounds of a crackling fire! If I heard such a thing I'd pull the plug out of the wall and call 911! :-)Mark Dottle - To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]