RE: MD: SCMS question

2001-08-31 Thread Simon Mackay


=BEGIN QUOTE=
Last night I made a compilation CD on a Pioneer twin deck recorder for a
mate of mine, using a number of Minidisc tracks. The first few were
ANALOGUE copies of MD's as the MD's were digital copies of the original
CD. The last few were digital copies (bringing my Sony MZ-1 out of
retirement and using its digital output to feed into the CD deck! I KNEW
it would come in useful one day!), as the source was an MD recording of
an analogue tape
Once having compiled this I thought 'Hmmm, I'll make a copy of this for
myself', and put the new CD (a mixture of analogue and digital tracks)
into the CD recorder, and managed to copy it all to a blank CD.
My question is because the first few tracks were analogue copies of the
MD, the burner was quite happy to record these, but I was surprised the
last few were allowed as these were digital copies of the MD. When does
the SCMS check get done? At the start of the disc or at the start of
each track? If its the start of the disc, the analogue tracks seem to
have let the digital ones slip through. The only alternative I can think
of is that the CD recorder switched to an analogue copy for the last few
tracks?
===END QUOTE

I would suspect that the Pioneer, like most twin-deck audio CD burners,
would use SCMS-driven analogue routing. This means that if the tracks on the
original CD are marked SCMS-final, the unit would route the signal through
an internal analogue bus. The reason that this practice is common and able
to be done is that a lot of these units have dual DACs - one for each
transport. This also allows for the unit to be treated as two CD players --
useful for music stores, mixing and the like.

With regards,

Simon Mackay

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS question

2001-08-31 Thread Clinton, Martin


Last night I made a compilation CD on a Pioneer twin deck recorder for a
mate of mine, using a number of Minidisc tracks. The first few were
ANALOGUE copies of MD's as the MD's were digital copies of the original
CD. The last few were digital copies (bringing my Sony MZ-1 out of
retirement and using its digital output to feed into the CD deck! I KNEW
it would come in useful one day!), as the source was an MD recording of
an analogue tape
Once having compiled this I thought 'Hmmm, I'll make a copy of this for
myself', and put the new CD (a mixture of analogue and digital tracks)
into the CD recorder, and managed to copy it all to a blank CD.
My question is because the first few tracks were analogue copies of the
MD, the burner was quite happy to record these, but I was surprised the
last few were allowed as these were digital copies of the MD. When does
the SCMS check get done? At the start of the disc or at the start of
each track? If its the start of the disc, the analogue tracks seem to
have let the digital ones slip through. The only alternative I can think
of is that the CD recorder switched to an analogue copy for the last few
tracks?
Sorry if I've not explained this very well, but anyone got any ideas?
Thanks a lot
Martin


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed. Please also be aware that DnB cannot
accept any payment orders or other legally binding correspondence with
customers as a part of an email. 

This email message has been virus checked by the virus programs used
in the DnB Group.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and Microphone Recording

2001-05-08 Thread Stuart Howlette


This email was delivered to you by The Free Internet,
a Business Online Group company. http://www.thefreeinternet.net
---

What the hell has crawled up everyones ass and died recently, the term "not
quite there mate" was meant to be an addition, not talking down at someone,
and sorry for being wrong, maybe ure not human, maybe ure some artificial
intellifence that never makes a mistake. Dont be so patronising and
condescental yourself, I admit I am wrong, but there is no need to rip my
head off for it, admit it, ure human, u've made mistakes, or are so
infallible that a mistake would override your system in make it crash and
bring you down?

--
Stuart Howlette
"There are many questions in life, but is the right answer only correct
because the majority believe in it?"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minidisc.sphosting.com
http://minidisc.sphosting.com/personal/
--
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: MD: SCMS and Microphone Recording


>
> | Hmm, still not quite there mate,
>
> Howlette, your condescension is inappropriate.  Even if you were right and
I
> wrong, it would still be rude.  Talking down at someone when you're wrong
and
> the other person is right -- as is the case here -- is even worse.
>
> | its that its on MiniDisc, so it cannot be copied again, remember, it has
an
> | ADC, so it gets converted to digital, then cannot be copied.
>
> You are 100% wrong about that.  If that were true, it would be impossible
> ever to make a digital copy from a MiniDisc under SCMS.  Perhaps you
believe
> that it is, but in actual reality it isn't.  I've done it many, many
times.
>
> The facts are that analog input digitized by the recorder's on-board ADC
is
> laid down as SCMS-penultimate, and one generation of digital recopying is
> allowed under SCMS.  If one were foolish enough to route the analog signal
> through an outboard ADC, the ADC's digital output would probably be
SCMS-pen-
> ultimate; then the recording would be SCMS-final and one really couldn't
make
> a further copy of it digitally, but that isn't the case here.
>
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and Microphone Recording

2001-05-08 Thread dattier


| Hmm, still not quite there mate,

Howlette, your condescension is inappropriate.  Even if you were right and I
wrong, it would still be rude.  Talking down at someone when you're wrong and
the other person is right -- as is the case here -- is even worse.

| its that its on MiniDisc, so it cannot be copied again, remember, it has an
| ADC, so it gets converted to digital, then cannot be copied.

You are 100% wrong about that.  If that were true, it would be impossible
ever to make a digital copy from a MiniDisc under SCMS.  Perhaps you believe
that it is, but in actual reality it isn't.  I've done it many, many times.

The facts are that analog input digitized by the recorder's on-board ADC is
laid down as SCMS-penultimate, and one generation of digital recopying is
allowed under SCMS.  If one were foolish enough to route the analog signal
through an outboard ADC, the ADC's digital output would probably be SCMS-pen-
ultimate; then the recording would be SCMS-final and one really couldn't make
a further copy of it digitally, but that isn't the case here.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and Microphone Recording

2001-05-08 Thread Stuart Howlette


This email was delivered to you by The Free Internet,
a Business Online Group company. http://www.thefreeinternet.net
---
Hmm, still not quite there mate, its that its on MiniDisc, so it cannot be
copied again, remember, it has an ADC, so it gets converted to digital, then
cannot be copied.
--
Stuart Howlette
"There are many questions in life, but is the right answer only correct
because the majority believe in it?"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minidisc.sphosting.com
http://minidisc.sphosting.com/personal/
--
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: MD: SCMS and Microphone Recording


>
> John Salomone wrote,
>
> | Ok gang, what's the deal here?  I've bootlegged several shows recently
using
> | my Aiwa AM-F70 and my Core Sound mics and battery box.  I use the
"line-in"
> | setting since I have the powered mics.  I guess this constitutes a
digital
> | input then?
>
> No, it's analog, unless you were using a digitizing microphone (which for
all
> I know doesn't exist) or had an in-line ADC between the microphone and the
> recorder.
>
> | I can only assume so since I can't make digital copies of the recordings
> | (SCMS prevent).
>
> Are you positive that SCMS is the reason?  Microphone input should be laid
> down as SCMS-penultimate just like any other analog source digitized by
the
> recorder's on-board ADC.  The F70 doesn't have digital output; what other
> unit are you playing the discs on to try to make a copy by digital
transfer?
> Maybe it's malfunctioning.  More likely your inability to copy has nothing
to
> do with SCMS.
>
> | So if I use the "mic" settings to record will it be a different story
(i.e.
> | it will be a SCMS-free recording)?
>
> It will be SCMS-penultimate.  Recordings on MD, DAT, CD, or DCC are never
> "SCMS-free"; the bits are always there and they have to be set to some
value
> or other, whether that setting is to allow one generation of further
copying
> (which I prefer to call SCMS-penultimate), unlimited generations
(SCMS-unlim-
> ited), or no further copying (SCMS-final).  Computer sound files and
analog
> storage don't have SCMS information; when they are copied to a digital
audio
> format that implements SCMS, the SCMS bits have to be set somehow, usually
to
> penultimate.
>
> |   I guess the next question is what are my best SCMS stripping options?
I
> | don't want to mess with building the elektor kit.  Must I wait until I
get
> | my new computer and do this on CD-R using the Sony PCS-1 link?  But
doesn't
> | this yield an anlog copy anyway, something I can already do with MD to
MD.
>
> If your computer has a soundcard with digital inputs, and you have an MD
unit
> with digital output, you could rip digitally to the computer.  Since
computer
> sound files do not support SCMS information, you'd avoid interference from
> SCMS without needing to go analog.
>
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and Microphone Recording

2001-05-07 Thread dattier


John Salomone wrote,

| Ok gang, what's the deal here?  I've bootlegged several shows recently using
| my Aiwa AM-F70 and my Core Sound mics and battery box.  I use the "line-in"
| setting since I have the powered mics.  I guess this constitutes a digital
| input then?

No, it's analog, unless you were using a digitizing microphone (which for all
I know doesn't exist) or had an in-line ADC between the microphone and the
recorder.

| I can only assume so since I can't make digital copies of the recordings
| (SCMS prevent).

Are you positive that SCMS is the reason?  Microphone input should be laid
down as SCMS-penultimate just like any other analog source digitized by the
recorder's on-board ADC.  The F70 doesn't have digital output; what other
unit are you playing the discs on to try to make a copy by digital transfer?
Maybe it's malfunctioning.  More likely your inability to copy has nothing to
do with SCMS.

| So if I use the "mic" settings to record will it be a different story (i.e.
| it will be a SCMS-free recording)?

It will be SCMS-penultimate.  Recordings on MD, DAT, CD, or DCC are never
"SCMS-free"; the bits are always there and they have to be set to some value
or other, whether that setting is to allow one generation of further copying
(which I prefer to call SCMS-penultimate), unlimited generations (SCMS-unlim-
ited), or no further copying (SCMS-final).  Computer sound files and analog
storage don't have SCMS information; when they are copied to a digital audio
format that implements SCMS, the SCMS bits have to be set somehow, usually to
penultimate.

|   I guess the next question is what are my best SCMS stripping options?  I
| don't want to mess with building the elektor kit.  Must I wait until I get
| my new computer and do this on CD-R using the Sony PCS-1 link?  But doesn't
| this yield an anlog copy anyway, something I can already do with MD to MD.

If your computer has a soundcard with digital inputs, and you have an MD unit
with digital output, you could rip digitally to the computer.  Since computer
sound files do not support SCMS information, you'd avoid interference from
SCMS without needing to go analog.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS and Microphone Recording

2001-05-07 Thread John Salomone


Ok gang, what's the deal here?  I've bootlegged several shows recently using 
my Aiwa AM-F70 and my Core Sound mics and battery box.  I use the "line-in" 
setting since I have the powered mics.  I guess this constitutes a digital 
input then?  I can only assume so since I can't make digital copies of the 
recordings (SCMS prevent).  This sucks.  So if I use the "mic" settings to 
record will it be a different story (i.e. it will be a SCMS-free recording)? 
  I guess the next question is what are my best SCMS stripping options?  I 
don't want to mess with building the elektor kit.  Must I wait until I get 
my new computer and do this on CD-R using the Sony PCS-1 link?  But doesn't 
this yield an anlog copy anyway, something I can already do with MD to MD.  
Help free me from some of this SCMS confusion.  Thanks.

John
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS Stripper

2001-04-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Where is the best place to get an SCMS stripper that will leave the track
marks and such?  I read about the German kit (last week wasn't it?) but was
wondering if anyone sells one already assembled.  Need a reliable source so
if the kit is the only way just point me to the place!

THANKS!
Les
www.musicmixers.com/mall


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: scms stripper again...

2001-03-28 Thread Catrin


 === The original message was multipart MIME===
 === All non-text parts (attachments) have been removed ===

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS editor for sale

2001-01-16 Thread Glen


If anyone is interested, I have D4-2 Copy Con available for $159 + s/h.  This 
SCMS editor works perfectly.  I don't really use it that much though, and am 
trying to finance a DVD player.  Email me privately if you are interested.

Thanks,
Glen 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


>Subject: MD: MiniDisc Weekly News for 14 January 2001
> o Oliver spots the Friend-Chip D4-2 Copy Con, an SCMS editor,
>   available from [4]Klay Anderson Audio for USD $199. www.klay.com

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS

2000-10-12 Thread Len Moskowitz


Keith Whitfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Where Do you get the SCMS stripper from or do you build them yourself.
> What price are they and are they the sort of thing you can get in
> electronic/Audio shops if not wheres a good web site to buy from.

The Midiman CO3 does the job at a reasonable cost.  You can find details
about it on our Web page.


Len Moskowitz Stealth Microphones (tm), Cables, Interfaces
Core Soundhttp://www.stealthmicrophones.com
Teaneck, New Jersey   http://www.core-sound.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS

2000-10-11 Thread Keith Whitfield



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

Where Do you get the SCMS stripper from or do you build them yourself.
What price are they and are they the sort of thing you can get in
electronic/Audio shops if not wheres a good web site to buy from.

thanks
keith
On 05-Sep-00, you wrote:

> 
> Jeanmougin wrote,
> 
> But what will be the SCMS status of this new digital copy (unlimited copy
> or one
> generation allowed?)?
> 
> It might depend on your stripper. Mine makes the new digital copy
> "unlimited copy".
> It is very convenient. Having a SCMS stripper between my deck and my R-90
> has been a real upgrade. Great for re-organizing and consolidating music
> between MD's.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Leland
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS

2000-09-05 Thread Lfmcarthy


Jeanmougin wrote,

But what will be the SCMS status of this new digital copy (unlimited copy or 
one
generation allowed?)?

It might depend on your stripper.  Mine makes the new digital copy "unlimited 
copy".
It is very convenient.  Having a SCMS stripper between my deck and my R-90 
has been a real upgrade.  Great for re-organizing and consolidating music 
between MD's.

Regards,

Leland
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS

2000-09-05 Thread David W. Tamkin


I could swear I posted a reply a few days ago, but it never showed up at
either of my subscriptions, so sorry if this is a duplication.

Jeanmougin followed up,

| If I play a digitally recorded MD on a deck and I use a SCMS stripper
| between the optical out of the deck and the optical in of a recorder, I'll
| pass-by the SCMS interdiction. But what will be the SCMS status of this new
| digital copy (unlimited copy or one generation allowed?)?

That depends on the particulars of the stripping firmware.  Let's rule out
the possibility that the recording device is professional grade, because with
a pro-grade recorder you wouldn't need nor be using a stripper.  Let's also
rule out the possibility that the destination unit will refuse to record
because of SCMS, because then the stripper isn't working and the question
requires that the copy came to be.  So we have a digital signal being ac-
cepted and recorded by a consumer-grade MD recorder.

Either the output of the stripper is SCMS-unlimited, the copy should also be
SCMS-unlimited, and further generations can be made without a stripper; or
the output of the stripper is SCMS-penultimate, the copy is SCMS-final, and
making another generation would require a stripper again.

[I'm tempted to say that the copy can't be SCMS-penultimate, that a consumer-
 grade recorder will never generate an SCMS-penultimate recording from a di-
 gital signal; but there still is the mystery of DBS tuners, which no one
 here (Ralf Kuchenhart looked into it pretty deeply and came to no hard con-
 clusions) has ever solved.  I suppose that if the stripper sent out the same
 settings (not just of SCMS but also of whatever else it takes) to make the
 signal seem to the recorder like one from that kind of DBS tuner, it could
 happen.]

The Prospec MSP730 has two settings: pass the SCMS bits as they are or set
them for unlimited recopying.  So when I use my stripper, the copy is SCMS-
unlimited and further generations can be made by digital transfer without
SCMS problems.  On the other hand (though there is no in-line stripper in
this example), according to Derek Streeter, when an early ROM version of the
MZ-R50 is set to "SCMS OFF," if it receives an SCMS-final signal it makes an
SCMS-final recording (in contrast to refusing to record it at all), so copy-
ing the copy requires circumventing SCMS all over again.  (It also makes 
SCMS-final copies from SCMS-penultimate input with the "SCMS OFF" setting,
just as with "SCMS ON.")

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS

2000-09-03 Thread jeanmougin


OK. So, SCMS strippers don't remove SCMS. They change the SCMS status to pass-by
the interdiction.
If I play a digitally recorded MD on a deck and I use a SCMS stripper between
the optical out of the deck
and the optical in of a recorder, I'll pass-by the SCMS interdiction. But what
will be the SCMS status of this new digital copy (unlimited copy or one
generation allowed?)?

David W. Tamkin a écrit:

> Jeanmougin wrote,
>
> | When you make a copy of a CD with optical cable, SCMS is implemented on
> | the MD.
>
> SCMS was implemented on the CD to start, but it was set to allow one gene-
> ration of digital copying.  Permission to copy does not mean absence of SCMS:
> SCMS is the *system* (that's what the second S stands for) and it is imple-
> mented on all consumer digital audio media.
>
> [The problem with saying "this doesn't have SCMS" or "there's no SCMS here"
>  to describe an SCMS-compliant recording that allows copying is that saying
>  it that way destroys the distinctions among (1) a recording or signal whose
>  SCMS bits allow one generation of copying, (2) a recording or signal whose
>  SCMS bits allow unlimited generations of recopying, and (3) a storage format
>  {such as a .wav or .mp3 file on a hard disk} or a transmission protocol
>  {such as AES/EBU or an analog signal} that truly does not carry SCMS infor-
>  mation.  Only type #3 can properly be described as "not having SCMS."]
>
> | The copy bit 10 is written and prevents a second generation digital copy.
>
> "10" is the designation for "no further digital copying" on DATs; on MDs it's
> actually "01" (in bits 6 and 5 of the segment's status word).
>
> | But is it the MD recorder that puts SCMS protection on the disc or does the
> | MD recorder only write the copy bit of the source?  In other words, is it
> | the digital out of a deck (CD, MD) that sends the SCMS status or is it the
> | MD recorder that writes the SCMS status during recording?
>
> Both.  (Pardon the anthropomorphisms here, but they do facilitate the expla-
> nation.)  The source machine reports the SCMS status of whatever it is play-
> ing and the destination machine decides how to respond.  If the source sends
> out "I am playing an SCMS-penultimate recording" in its S/PDIF output, then
> the destination machine decides "This signal is SCMS-penultimate, and I obey
> SCMS, so I must mark the copy I'm writing as SCMS-final."  When you try to
> copy an SCMS-final source digitally, it is the destination machine that de-
> cides, "This signal is SCMS-final, and I obey SCMS, so I won't record it."
> A professional-grade recorder might have logic instead of say, "I'm receiving
> an SCMS-final signal, but my switches are set to disobey SCMS and to write
> SCMS bits that allow unlimited recopying (or to write SCMS bits that allow
> one more generation, or however the switches are set), so that's what I'll
> do."
>
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS

2000-09-02 Thread David W. Tamkin


Jeanmougin wrote,

| When you make a copy of a CD with optical cable, SCMS is implemented on
| the MD.

SCMS was implemented on the CD to start, but it was set to allow one gene-
ration of digital copying.  Permission to copy does not mean absence of SCMS:
SCMS is the *system* (that's what the second S stands for) and it is imple-
mented on all consumer digital audio media.

[The problem with saying "this doesn't have SCMS" or "there's no SCMS here"
 to describe an SCMS-compliant recording that allows copying is that saying
 it that way destroys the distinctions among (1) a recording or signal whose
 SCMS bits allow one generation of copying, (2) a recording or signal whose
 SCMS bits allow unlimited generations of recopying, and (3) a storage format
 {such as a .wav or .mp3 file on a hard disk} or a transmission protocol
 {such as AES/EBU or an analog signal} that truly does not carry SCMS infor-
 mation.  Only type #3 can properly be described as "not having SCMS."]

| The copy bit 10 is written and prevents a second generation digital copy.

"10" is the designation for "no further digital copying" on DATs; on MDs it's
actually "01" (in bits 6 and 5 of the segment's status word).

| But is it the MD recorder that puts SCMS protection on the disc or does the
| MD recorder only write the copy bit of the source?  In other words, is it
| the digital out of a deck (CD, MD) that sends the SCMS status or is it the
| MD recorder that writes the SCMS status during recording?

Both.  (Pardon the anthropomorphisms here, but they do facilitate the expla-
nation.)  The source machine reports the SCMS status of whatever it is play-
ing and the destination machine decides how to respond.  If the source sends
out "I am playing an SCMS-penultimate recording" in its S/PDIF output, then
the destination machine decides "This signal is SCMS-penultimate, and I obey
SCMS, so I must mark the copy I'm writing as SCMS-final."  When you try to
copy an SCMS-final source digitally, it is the destination machine that de-
cides, "This signal is SCMS-final, and I obey SCMS, so I won't record it."
A professional-grade recorder might have logic instead of say, "I'm receiving
an SCMS-final signal, but my switches are set to disobey SCMS and to write
SCMS bits that allow unlimited recopying (or to write SCMS bits that allow
one more generation, or however the switches are set), so that's what I'll
do."

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS

2000-09-02 Thread jeanmougin


When you make a copy of a CD with optical cable, SCMS is implemented on
the MD. The copy bit 10 is written and prevents a second generation
digital copy. But is it the MD recorder that puts SCMS protection on the
disc or does the MD recorder only write the copy bit of the source?
In other words, is it the digital out of a deck (CD, MD) that sends the
SCMS status or is it the MD recorder that writes the SCMS status during
recording?

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and burning CDs

2000-07-23 Thread David W. Tamkin


Julien Blaise asked,

| Once, a friend gave me a burned audio cd, and when I tried to copy it
| digitally to my R55 it said "NoCopy" !!!
| So I would like to know how SCMS works when you copy an audio CD,
| because now I have a cd-writer and  I copied an audio cd and then I
| tried to put this copy on MD, to see what's happening. And to my
| surprise I was able to copy this copy (!) to my MD.
| To burn this CD, I used WinOnCD.
| So, is it the software or the cd-writer? Also I saw in Nero a Copyright
| option. Is it SCMS  ??

Yes, it's very much SCMS.

Since you mention WinOnCD and Nero, I gather you wrote your CD on a com-
puter's CDR drive.  Computers are not audio devices primarily, and they are
exempt from SCMS.  When you burn a CD from a computer, the burning software
has to set the SCMS bits on the CD somehow, but it doesn't need to comply
with SCMS.  So some burning programs always set the SCMS bits for one more
generation of copying, and some let the user decide how to set them, and
there are other possibilities (which I haven't seen myself).

If your friend used a standalone audio CD recorder and made a digital
transfer from a source coded to allow only one generation of copying, then
it follows that the CDR was coded to forbid any digital copying.  But the
rules are different from burners that are computer peripherals and recorders
that are separate audio components.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and burning CDs

2000-07-22 Thread J. Coon


AFAIK, the computer based CD burners don't bother with SCMS, but the
stand alone one do.  SO if your friend copied it on a stand alone unit,
the scms would be set to no copy, if you copied one on a computer based
system, scms would be set to unlimited copies.  
If I am wrong, I am sure someone will correct me, but that is what I
think is happening.

"Julien Blaise (E-coli)" wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Once, a friend gave me a burned audio cd, and when I tried to copy it
> digitally to my R55 it said "NoCopy" !!!
> So I would like to know how SCMS works when you copy an audio CD,
> because now I have a cd-writer and  I copied an audio cd and then I
> tried to put this copy on MD, to see what's happening. And to my
> surprise I was able to copy this copy (!) to my MD.
> To burn this CD, I used WinOnCD.
> So, is it the software or the cd-writer? Also I saw in Nero a Copyright
> option. Is it SCMS  ??
> Thanks in advance !
> (Sorry if it's a little OT !)
> 
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?

My first web page  

http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS and burning CDs

2000-07-22 Thread Julien Blaise (E-coli)


Hi,

Once, a friend gave me a burned audio cd, and when I tried to copy it
digitally to my R55 it said "NoCopy" !!!
So I would like to know how SCMS works when you copy an audio CD,
because now I have a cd-writer and  I copied an audio cd and then I
tried to put this copy on MD, to see what's happening. And to my
surprise I was able to copy this copy (!) to my MD.
To burn this CD, I used WinOnCD.
So, is it the software or the cd-writer? Also I saw in Nero a Copyright
option. Is it SCMS  ??
Thanks in advance !
(Sorry if it's a little OT !)

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS strippers

2000-07-18 Thread David W. Tamkin


Dodge wrote,

| I need an SCMS stripper to copy my OWN stuff for friends...
| Then there's no fuss about copyright, or is there ?

You're absolutely right.  What SCMS permits or prohibits does not line up
with what copyright law permits and prohibits.  SCMS isn't for enforcing
copyright law; it's for sucking up to the recording industry.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS strippers

2000-07-18 Thread Dodge


I wish to thank the following people :

James Jarvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jim Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
las <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

because they stood by me !

I need an SCMS stripper to copy my OWN stuff for friends...
Then there's no fuss about copyright, or is there ?
I made some recordings via my optical out on my soundcard, lost the original
files on my HD due to a crash and want to copy the stuff i recorded on MD for
some of my friends...

SO THAT ISN'T ILLEGAL !!!

And, another thing
Not everybody has enough money to splash out on PRO equipment...
I'm not an MD-audio freak, i just use it very regularly because of it's easy
recording and editing features...

I own 4 MD devices...
an MZ-R30 that i use to record the mixes i do in a club,
one MDS-37 (my first MD deck!), an PC2 for easy titling and PC related stuff
and one MDX 7900 for listening in my Jeep...

And i accumulated that equipment over 4 years...

So, i wish to thank those people again and keep on MD'ing !!!

Greetz,
Dodge

=

-

A wise man once said : - Being in a relationship is talking soft and LYING HARD ! 
(Dodge, 1999)

What do you think ? You can e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail   Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: Scms

2000-07-18 Thread Joost de Meij


>people don't necessarily want SCMS control just to STEAL music, it's
>also because without it you can't even copy YOUR OWN stuff.  And we
>don't all have the budgets for pro equipment.
Maybe they should make a setting that when you make an analog recording, you 
can set the SCMS-setting yourself. (Or only when you are making a recording 
with a mic...)



Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS (apology...)

2000-07-17 Thread J. Coon


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I dont want to start a thread on this, but I thought that
> SCMS was supposed to allow legitimate copying,
> but block "illegal" copying.

That is the way it should be.  However, the way it works is, if you make
an anolog recording, you can make only a first generation digital copy. 
It doesn't matter if it is a recording of  a CD, a tape, a radio
program, or your own taped practice session.  


You can copy your original once, digitally, and then the next copy has
to be analog.  That means I can't record myself playing and singing a
tune, then save the master and make edits on the copy and expect to make
digital copies of my edited version.  

Sort of sucks doesn't it?

--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?

My first web page  

http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS (apology...)

2000-07-17 Thread David W. Tamkin


Ed Wong wrote,

| I dont want to start a thread on this, but I thought that SCMS was supposed
| to allow legitimate copying, but block "illegal" copying.

No, SCMS is supposed to "manage" copying, hence its name.  It manages it very
poorly, prohibiting some copying that should be allowed and permitting some
copying that should be forbidden.

| So - whats the point of having SCMS anyway - the real "thieves" can get
| around it with a little effort (by buying pro stuff).

Exactly: it barely gives the pirates pause while it gets in the way of people
trying to edit and distribute material to which they do own the rights.

SCMS is even a bigger joke with MD, since by TOC-update evasion or TOC
cloning one can alter SCMS bits on recordable MDs even with consumer-grade
hardware.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS (apology...)

2000-07-17 Thread Ed . Wong


Point well made

I dont want to start a thread on this, but I thought that
SCMS was supposed to allow legitimate copying,
but block "illegal" copying.
Now granted - maybe the SCMS schema itself is flawed
(which I would NOT be surprised at), but if SCMS actually
worked to block illegal copying uses, then the
reasons to bypass SCMS would be only for "nefarious"
purposes.

In any case - I think the whole schema of "pro" equipment
is dumb anyway. If I were going to "manufacture" CDs
to "steal" music - Id get the pro stuff anyway.
So - whats the point of having SCMS anyway - the real
"thiefs" can get around it with a little effort
(by buying pro stuff).

I didnt mean to accuse people of copyright theft -
I merely wanted to point out that there was an
alternative SCMS "stripper" that isnt that well
known (outside of this list of course).

EWong

___
To EWong.  Maybe the original poster would have bought
the professional equipment, if he had realized that he
wanted that feature (i.e. the ability to set the
SCMS); but now that he has a MD recorder, doesn't
really want to go out and buy another unit.
SNIP


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: scms

2000-07-16 Thread las


I agree with you 100% and that's why I don't think that they should be
allowed to force it on us.

It can be looked at two ways regarding preventing crime.  You put locks
on doors to keep people from stealing or people know that stealing is a
crime and even though you have a sidewalk sale, people don't just run
away with stuff.

Larry

Jim Gray wrote:

> people don't necessarily want SCMS control just to STEAL music, it's
> also because without it you can't even copy YOUR OWN stuff.  And we
> don't all have the budgets for pro equipment.
>
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: scms

2000-07-16 Thread las


I agree with you 100% and that's why I don't think that they should be
alowed to force it on us.

It can be looked at two ways regarding preventing crime.  You put locks
on doors to keep people from stealing or people know that stealing is a
crime and even though you have a sidewalk sale, people don't just run
away with stuff.

Larry

Jim Gray wrote:

> people don't necessarily want SCMS control just to STEAL music, it's
> also because without it you can't even copy YOUR OWN stuff.  And we
> don't all have the budgets for pro equipment.
>
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: scms

2000-07-16 Thread Jim Gray


people don't necessarily want SCMS control just to STEAL music, it's
also because without it you can't even copy YOUR OWN stuff.  And we
don't all have the budgets for pro equipment.


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS Stripper

2000-07-16 Thread James Jarvie


To EWong.  Maybe the original poster would have bought
the professional equipment, if he had realized that he
wanted that feature (i.e. the ability to set the
SCMS); but now that he has a MD recorder, doesn't
really want to go out and buy another unit.

P.S. There are times when one would want to get around
SCMS that aren't necessary copywrite infringements.

Judge not, lest ye be judged.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail   Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS bit remover... cont

2000-07-15 Thread Ed . Wong


I happen to have "pro" MD and CDR equipment.
Now I really havent bothered to look into the issue, becuase
Im mostly making mixes and thus HAVE to use analog inputs;
I dont think Ive even seen a full digital mixer - at
least not something that has a cross fader.

I usually make the mix on MD and then download to CDR -
since all the equipment is "pro" ive never cared
to see what SCMS settings were...

Anyway - I do recall some configurations settings
so that I can
1 - follow canonical settings
2 - force to no copy
3 - force to one copy
4 - force to unlimited copy
Im not sure of the details, but if anyone is really
intersted, I'll look it up
  - Tascam CDR-1000 (no longer sold AFAIK)
  - Denon MD-2300R

Anyway - the point of the post was to obtusely
state my opinion of the whole SCMS issue - in that
all this "I want a SCMS stripper" inquiry is kinda
DUMB. What it seems is that people want an SCMS
stripper that costs next to nothing.
Pro level equipment in effect has a SCMS stripper
built in. The cost of pro equipment is roughly
twice that of consumer equipment. I have seen
pro MD units for about $600 (Sony MD-11? - the neat
1U unit) Yeah - it might be possible to get a home
unit for $150 and a "stripper" for $100 but why
deal with all the "shady aspects", the pro stuff is
legal to buy and own... oh - thats right we want to
STEAL music hence the quest for low cost.
So if thats your angle - go steal pro equipment?

Sorry for the rant - I just find it silly that someone
is going to NY to get an "theft" device when one is
probably available at the local music shop (for enuff $$
of course)

EWong


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-14 Thread Stories


>>I'm going to New-York next week, and i want to bring back a SCMS
stripper
>>Does anyone have an adress of a shop in NY ?
>>I wanna bring it back from the US with me, because you can't find it
anywhere
>>over here ! (Belgium)
>
>As far as I know they are illegal in this country.  Even people who
used to
>sell them on the internet seemed to have been forced to stop.  A
similar
>thing is going on
>now with DVD players that allow you to disable their copy protection
>(Macrovision). They have been forced to modify their players so that
you can
>not defeat it.


I would recomend buying a good digital I/O board, just need to make sure
you go for one that passes the input to the out put with out any
proccessing.  RME ( www.rme-audio.de ) make some nice I/O  boards.
There are go and bad points with doing it that way.
more features more problemsetc...
But you can buy them anywhere legally.

--
matt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-13 Thread J. Coon


yep

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I thought "pro" equipment ignored teh SCMS bits
> Thus all "pro" equipment in effect has SCMS strippers
> built in...
> 
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?

My first web page  

http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-13 Thread David W. Tamkin


Ed Wong wrote,

| I thought "pro" equipment ignored teh SCMS bits

Pro equipment can ignore the SCMS bits of what it *reads*, but it needs to
set them somehow or other on what it *writes*.  My understanding ... and I've
occasionally asked people who own a piece of pro equipment what it did ... 
is that it usually can set the SCMS bits of its recordings however the user
chooses, regardless of the SCMS status of the input.  Often (maybe almost
always) the machine would also have a setting to do the canonical thing with
SCMS bits, same as a consumer unit.

| Thus all "pro" equipment in effect has SCMS strippers built in...

Yes, you could say they do.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-13 Thread Ed . Wong


I thought "pro" equipment ignored teh SCMS bits
Thus all "pro" equipment in effect has SCMS strippers
built in...


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-12 Thread Nathan White


If you use a Sony Deck, you can trick the SCMS. It is very easy to do,
instructions in the link below.


http://members.aol.com/BorusSylt/scms.htm
another good site:


http://ravn.net/md/



--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of las
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD: SCMS Strippers




  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

As far as I know they are illegal in this country.  Even people who used to
sell them on the internet seemed to have been forced to stop.  A similar
thing is going on
now with DVD players that allow you to disable their copy protection
(Macrovision). They have been forced to modify their players so that you can
not defeat it.

That leads to the debate about copying an MD copied from a CD, for example.
Right now if you make a digital copy of the MD, you can't make a digital
copy from that MD
on to another MD.

I question the wisdom of doing that in the first place.  Every time you copy
an MD you have to "decompress" it and "compress" it again.  There has got to
be some
generation loss with each copy of a copy.  But since I have never personally
done it (I don't have a SCMS stripper to be able to do it in the first
place) I can't
personally say if you would hear a difference for the first few generations.
Perhaps someone else can comment on that.

Have a great day,
Larry

Dodge wrote:

> Hey guyz...
>
> I'm going to New-York next week, and i want to bring back a SCMS
stripper
> Does anyone have an adress of a shop in NY ?
> I wanna bring it back from the US with me, because you can't find it
anywhere
> over here ! (Belgium)
>
> Thnx in advance...
> Dodge
>
> =
>
> --

---
>
> A wise man once said : - Being in a relationship is talking soft and LYING
HARD ! (Dodge, 1999)
>
> What do you think ? You can e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --

---
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get Yahoo! Mail   Free email you can access from anywhere!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-12 Thread las



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

As far as I know they are illegal in this country.  Even people who used to sell them 
on the internet seemed to have been forced to stop.  A similar thing is going on
now with DVD players that allow you to disable their copy protection (Macrovision). 
They have been forced to modify their players so that you can not defeat it.

That leads to the debate about copying an MD copied from a CD, for example.  Right now 
if you make a digital copy of the MD, you can't make a digital copy from that MD
on to another MD.

I question the wisdom of doing that in the first place.  Every time you copy an MD you 
have to "decompress" it and "compress" it again.  There has got to be some
generation loss with each copy of a copy.  But since I have never personally done it 
(I don't have a SCMS stripper to be able to do it in the first place) I can't
personally say if you would hear a difference for the first few generations.  Perhaps 
someone else can comment on that.

Have a great day,
Larry

Dodge wrote:

> Hey guyz...
>
> I'm going to New-York next week, and i want to bring back a SCMS stripper
> Does anyone have an adress of a shop in NY ?
> I wanna bring it back from the US with me, because you can't find it anywhere
> over here ! (Belgium)
>
> Thnx in advance...
> Dodge
>
> =
>
> 
>-
>
> A wise man once said : - Being in a relationship is talking soft and LYING HARD ! 
>(Dodge, 1999)
>
> What do you think ? You can e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 
>-
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get Yahoo! Mail   Free email you can access from anywhere!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS Strippers

2000-07-12 Thread Dodge


Hey guyz...

I'm going to New-York next week, and i want to bring back a SCMS stripper
Does anyone have an adress of a shop in NY ?
I wanna bring it back from the US with me, because you can't find it anywhere
over here ! (Belgium)

Thnx in advance...
Dodge



=

-

A wise man once said : - Being in a relationship is talking soft and LYING HARD ! 
(Dodge, 1999)

What do you think ? You can e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail   Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and CD-Rs

2000-07-01 Thread David W. Tamkin


Simon Mackay asked,

| Does anyone know what the SCMS status is for audio CD-Rs that are burnt
| using a computer, rather than a standalone CD recorder.

That depends on the burning software.

| For example, if I ... burn a Red Book CD from the WAV files, how do these
| discs get treated -- whether the recording is a Penultimate, Unlimited or
| Final recording.

Adaptec Easy CD creator marks them penultimate.  It came with my Iomega CDRW
drive, so I haven't tried any other burning software.  I know they are penul-
timate because I copied them by digital transfer to MD without using a
stripper, and the transfer proceeded, but my JE520 identified the MD copies 
as SCMS-final.

| Also, is it possible to use a "For Consumer" CD-R which is used with a
| standalone CD recorder on a computer's CD burner for data or audio;

Audio, yes; data, I don't know.

| and whether these discs' "fingerprint" information can be used by CD-ROM
| drives to identify recordings for purposes such as title databases.

If you mean what I think you do, yes.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and CD-Rs

2000-07-01 Thread Richard Wright


At 14:04 01/07/2000 +1000, you wrote:

>Hi everyone!
>
>Does anyone know what the SCMS status is for audio CD-Rs that are burnt
>using a computer, rather than a standalone CD recorder. For example, if I
>make WAV files from a CD-DA disc, MP3 files, or audio obtained through the
>sound-card and burn a Red Book CD from the WAV files, how do these discs get
>treated -- whether the recording is a Penultimate, Unlimited or Final
>recording.

When you record with a computer CD-R drive, it is effectively a master disc 
which you're creating - you can then copy that disc onto MD or whatever.

>Also, is it possible to use a "For Consumer" CD-R which is used with a
>standalone CD recorder on a computer's CD burner for data or audio; and
>whether these discs' "fingerprint" information can be used by CD-ROM drives
>to identify recordings for purposes such as title databases.

I think it should be OK - I had a "consumer" Philips CD-RW and that worked 
fine in my CD-RW drive - computer drives aren't particularly fussy in my 
experience! Bear in mind that computer CD-R discs are cheaper than the 
consumer ones though...

>With regards,
>
>Simon Mackay

Cheers,

Richard

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS and CD-Rs

2000-07-01 Thread Simon Mackay


Hi everyone!

Does anyone know what the SCMS status is for audio CD-Rs that are burnt
using a computer, rather than a standalone CD recorder. For example, if I
make WAV files from a CD-DA disc, MP3 files, or audio obtained through the
sound-card and burn a Red Book CD from the WAV files, how do these discs get
treated -- whether the recording is a Penultimate, Unlimited or Final
recording.

Also, is it possible to use a "For Consumer" CD-R which is used with a
standalone CD recorder on a computer's CD burner for data or audio; and
whether these discs' "fingerprint" information can be used by CD-ROM drives
to identify recordings for purposes such as title databases.

With regards,

Simon Mackay

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS Questions

2000-05-24 Thread J. Coon



  ===
  = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please  =
  = be more selective when quoting text =
  ===

Just curious, but how do they get around the legality of SCMS control? 
I thouhgt the recording companies forced us all to put up with the
stupid SCMS by the copy right laws.  

Len Moskowitz wrote:
> 
> "Magic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Anyway I just wanted to ask about what types of machine exist that disable
> > the SCMS situation. I don't care for do-it-your-self ways or test modes,
> > service modes etc. I just wanted a retail device and the prices available...
> 
> We offer the Midiman CO3.  It converts between the various physical
> formats (Toslink fiber optic, RCA and XLR coaxial), plus it controls
> SCMS.
> 
> Please see our Web page for details.
> 
> Len Moskowitz Stealth Microphones (tm), Cables, Interfaces
> Core Soundhttp://www.stealthmicrophones.com
> Teaneck, New Jersey   http://www.core-sound.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS Questions

2000-05-24 Thread Len Moskowitz


"Magic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Anyway I just wanted to ask about what types of machine exist that disable
> the SCMS situation. I don't care for do-it-your-self ways or test modes,
> service modes etc. I just wanted a retail device and the prices available...

We offer the Midiman CO3.  It converts between the various physical
formats (Toslink fiber optic, RCA and XLR coaxial), plus it controls
SCMS.

Please see our Web page for details.


Len Moskowitz Stealth Microphones (tm), Cables, Interfaces
Core Soundhttp://www.stealthmicrophones.com
Teaneck, New Jersey   http://www.core-sound.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS Questions

2000-05-23 Thread Matthew Wall


As i recall if you just wanna disable smcs through optical digital then
there are (or at least used to be) a couple devices that would do this.  if
you just wan a md recorder/player that can ignore smcs then look into
tascam.  I know they make a couple that will do this, but i dont know of any
other brands currently that will.  hope this helps out.


- Original Message -
From: J. Coon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: MD: SCMS Questions


>
> Magic wrote:
> >
> > Anyway I just wanted to ask about what types of machine exist that
disable
> > the SCMS situation. I don't care for do-it-your-self ways or test modes,
> > service modes etc. I just wanted a retail device and the prices
available...
> >
> They are a sick bird. So you won't find any consumer grade MD units that
> disable SCMS.  The Current copy  right laws are what makes a consumer
> grade machine have SCMS.
>
> BTW a sick bird is an ill eagle.
> -
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS Questions

2000-05-23 Thread J. Coon


Magic wrote:
> 
> Anyway I just wanted to ask about what types of machine exist that disable
> the SCMS situation. I don't care for do-it-your-self ways or test modes,
> service modes etc. I just wanted a retail device and the prices available...
> 
They are a sick bird. So you won't find any consumer grade MD units that
disable SCMS.  The Current copy  right laws are what makes a consumer
grade machine have SCMS.  

BTW a sick bird is an ill eagle.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS Questions

2000-05-23 Thread Magic


Hello People,

I know I am not the first of the second bringing up the subject of SCMS but
I couldn't resist since buying a deck (Sony MDS-JB930) which has an optical
out. I have an MZ-R50 and a mini hi-fi system which has a Sony 3 MD
Recorder/Player (Sony EX880MD). When trying to make a copy of a digital
recording that I had created with my deck to the other two I got the NO COPY
message. After lots of thought I just wanted to say that sounds completed
stupid to me. Why SCMS hasn't become the stadar for all CDs available? In MD
most of us just create our own collections and many times we want to keep
another backup of our copies for various reasons.

Anyway I just wanted to ask about what types of machine exist that disable
the SCMS situation. I don't care for do-it-your-self ways or test modes,
service modes etc. I just wanted a retail device and the prices available...

thanx

Magic

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS Killers

2000-05-23 Thread Magic


Hi people,

I know I am not the first or the second bringing up the subject of 
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: SCMS and satellite tuner broadcasts

2000-05-14 Thread Simon Mackay


Regarding the SCMS (SP-DIF Copy Management System) and digital radio

==BEGIN QUOTE
So, per Yamaha, when a second generation is possible, so is a third.  The
tuner output includes SCMS status bits, and they work like those of any
other
source, and there's no anomalous antepenultimate setting.  That completely
disagrees with Sony, according to whom it's possible sometimes to make a
second generation within SCMS but never a third.
==END QUOTE===

It should depend on whether the SCMS logic is driven by the SP-DIF Category
Codes; where there are special codes defined for digital-broadcast tuners.

When I talk of digital broadcast tuners, I talk of the satellite tuners like
Japan's BS/CS tuners, the DSS tuners available in the US, the ADR/DMX tuners
sold in Europe, or any of the Sky DigiBoxes that offer SP/DIF output in the
UK; DAB tuners offered in Europe or Canada; or the DMX or MusicChoice
cable-radio boxes offered in the US.

Sony has published information in their SCMS description as though it caters
for tuners that publish the proper SP-DIF Category Code. On the other hand,
Yamaha are catering for "unknown" factors and mentioning that a "penultimate
override" may be provided by the broadcaster; in those situations like
"pay-per-listen" events offered by broadcasters.

Also, mo-one has offered any way of monitoring SP-DIF streams to identify
information like the SP-DIF Category Code or SCMS status. This could be
useful for identifying how digital tuners handle the SCMS issue. The only
way to monitor this factor is to make a recording via the SP-DIF Recent Sony
MD decks have an officially-unsupported ability to identify the SCMS status
of an MD recording.

With regards,

Simon Mackay

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS and satellite tuner broadcasts

2000-05-14 Thread David W. Tamkin


Sony MD recorder manuals, in describing SCMS, have always said that signals
from digital satellite broadcasts can be either SCMS-penultimate (you can
record them but you can't copy the recording digitally) or mysteriously
SCMS-antepenultimate (you can record them and copy that recording digitally
but SCMS prevents making a third generation digitally).  We've never found
an answer to what distinguishes the latter from the former, or how the latter
can even happen (unless the source medium code tells an MD recorder to mark
the recording as SCMS-penultimate).

Now the waters are muddied further.  Chris Browne just provided the manual
from the Yamaha MDX-793 to the MDCP, including this passage about SCMS on
digital satellite broadcasts, emphasis mine:

  You can record a digital signal input from a digital satellite broadcast
  onto a DAT tape or recordable MD via the digital input jack on the DAT or
  MD recorder.  ...  If the broadcast does not contain a copyright protection
  code, you can then record the contents of this recorded DAT tape or MD
  (first generation) onto another DAT tape or recordable MD via a digital
  input jack on the DAT or MD recorder to create a second generation digital
  copy (these copies may also be copied digitally).
^  
  Note, however, that if the broadcast contains a copy protection code,
  second-generation digital copying will not be possible.  

So, per Yamaha, when a second generation is possible, so is a third.  The
tuner output includes SCMS status bits, and they work like those of any other
source, and there's no anomalous antepenultimate setting.  That completely
disagrees with Sony, according to whom it's possible sometimes to make a 
second generation within SCMS but never a third.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS information

2000-03-09 Thread David W. Tamkin


Been meaning to answer this for a long time.  Martin Schiff quoted something
David Tosti-Lane had posted in CompuServe's midiforum, which read, in part,

| If it sees a "0" here, then copyright is enabled, if it sees a "1",
| copyright is not enabled, and it stops looking.  Again, I strongly suspect
| that consumer MD recorders by default set this bit to "0" on _all_
| recordings, regardless of their origin.

His suspicion was ill-founded.  My Sony and Aiwa MD recorders, and my Pioneer
CD recorder, all being consumer machines, make SCMS-unlimited copies when fed
digital input from SCMS-unlimited sources.

As Petr Simanek originally posted here, the SCMS status of an MD segment can
be read on Sony decks (well, not the ATRAC 4.0 series) in Retry Cause Display
mode while the unit is playing it [or paused while playing it].  The status
byte breaks down as follows:

bit 7: 0 = premastered, 1 = recordable
bit 6: 0 = SCMS-restricted, 1 = SCMS-unrestricted
bit 5: 0 = SCMS-original, 1 = SCMS-copied
bit 4: always 0 on MiniDiscs
bit 3: always 0 on MiniDiscs
bit 2: always 1 on MiniDiscs
bit 1: 0 = monaural, 1 = stereophonic
bit 0: 0 = not preemphasized, 1 = preemphasized

So typically the high nybble will be 0 for premastered MDs, 8 for recordings
of analog input, A for recordings of digital input from types 0 or 8, and E
for SCMS-unlimited material.  The low nybble will be 6 for stereo and 4 for
mono (add 1 if the segment is preemphasized).

Despite Mr. Tosti-Lane's expectations, digital transfers of type-E material
to consumer-grade recorders are type E.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS information

2000-02-07 Thread Martin Schiff


This message from one of the SYSOPS on the CompuServe midiforum is one of
the better explanations of SCMS implementation that I have read. It also
offers an explanation as to why the SCMS on the Hoontech board may be
implemented incorrectly, and why I can copy pre-recorded MD's, but not my
originals.
-- Martin

: 593859 S15/Sound Cards  (CIS:MIDIFORUM)
06-Feb-00  21:32:11
Sb: Digital discrepancy
Fm: Dave Tosti-Lane -Sysop 70334,3165
To: Martin Schiff [CONSULT] 76702,1355
Replies: 0TID: 7735  Par: 593828Chd: 0 Sib: 0

>> I am told by people who seem to know a lot about SCMS that I should be
able to make a first generation copy (from the original) of a minidisc that
was recorded from an analog source. <<

The operative word is "should".  There are several bits in the channel block
data stream that determine SCMS behavior, or at least, that have some
effect.  One defines the format as either pro or consumer, that is only read
by "pro" equipment, that is, equipment designed to read either AES3 or
S/PDIF input.  If it reads "pro" then the system actually knows to read the
copy protection bit as something else (part of the Emphasis setting).  The
Consumer/Pro bit is bit "0" of byte "0", the copyright status bit is bit "2"
of Byte "0", and finally, the _generation_ bit is bit "7" of Byte "1".

The scheme is designed so that you can make a Digital copy of copywrighted
material, but you cannot make a copy of a copy.  SCMS first looks at the
Pro/Consumer bit, and if it sees a "1", (for Pro format) it does not operate
at all. (my suspicion is that some consumer gear may not make this check,
simply assuming material is always consumer)

Next, if the material is identified as consumer (Byte zero, bit zero set to
"0"), which it _always_ will be for anything recorded on a consumer level MD
(even a recording made from the analog inputs), then it looks at byte zero
bit 2.  If it sees a "0" here, then copyright is enabled, if it sees a "1",
copyright is not enabled, and it stops looking.  Again, I strongly suspect
that consumer MD recorders by default set this bit to "0" on _all_
recordings, regardless of their origin.

If the copy bit is set to "0", then the last check is to see whether this is
a first generation or second generation copy.  Here is where mistakes are
easily made in setting up receiving systems, because there are two different
schemes to determine the meaning of this bit, and they are exactly the
reverse of each other.  For most media, the generation bit (called the "L"
bit) is read as "original" if the bit is a "1" and as a "copy" if the bit is
a "0".  BUT, believe it or not, for laser optical products, the reverse is
true, a "0" indicates "original" and a "1" indicates "copy".  (For CDs it's
even crazier, and the "L" bit isn't used at all, with the "C" bit being "0"
for "no copyrite", solid "1" for "original with Copyrite" and alternating
back and forth from 1 to 0 at a 4-10Hz rate to indicate "copy of original"
!!)

Byte 1 bits 0-6 are supposed to indicate the type of equipment that is
connected, so that the system can interpret the L bit correctly.

So, what I suspect is happening, is that the card is failing to distinguish
the type of equipment, looking at the L bit,  reading a "0" which your MD
encoded since this is an "original" recording, but interpreting it to say
that the MD is already a copy, and not letting you make a digital copy.

Which is scant comfort of course. 

The amusing part is, if this is what's happening, then the reason you are
able to make a copy from the pre-recorded MD is precisely because the record
company tried to set it so you couldn't.

Dave Tosti-Lane

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS question

2000-01-13 Thread J. Coon


Filip wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > Newbie question: If I make a field recording using an
> > > analog microphone,
> > > may I may a duplicate of that MD digitally? That is, play
> > > the MD in a
> > > player and link digitally to a recorder.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, you can do that no problem at all. What you *cant* do is
> > then make a digital copy of that copy. If your original
> > recording is on disc "A" you can digitally copy it to
> > another disk, "B". You can't make a digital copy of "B"
> > onto another disk "C" although you can using analogue.
> > You could make a digital copy from "A" to "C".
> >
> 
> I believe this is only true for copyrighted material, ie. digital source
> that has copyright flag set to true (like commercial CD's). In that
> case, copy-of-original is OK, copy-of-copy is forbidden. I own my MD for
> two weeks, so I haven't tried this yet, but I'd expect you could make as
> many digital copies as you wished from your own recordings, since the
> copyright flag would not be set. Correct me if I'm wrong.


Ok, we correct you, because the first statement is correct.  If you make
an anallog copy, you can make a digital copy of it, but you can't make a
digital copy of the copy.


--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?


My first web page

http://www.tir.com/~liteways/
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: SCMS question

2000-01-13 Thread Filip


> >
> > Newbie question: If I make a field recording using an 
> > analog microphone,
> > may I may a duplicate of that MD digitally? That is, play 
> > the MD in a
> > player and link digitally to a recorder.
> >
> 
> Yes, you can do that no problem at all. What you *cant* do is 
> then make a digital copy of that copy. If your original
> recording is on disc "A" you can digitally copy it to
> another disk, "B". You can't make a digital copy of "B"
> onto another disk "C" although you can using analogue.
> You could make a digital copy from "A" to "C".
> 

I believe this is only true for copyrighted material, ie. digital source
that has copyright flag set to true (like commercial CD's). In that
case, copy-of-original is OK, copy-of-copy is forbidden. I own my MD for
two weeks, so I haven't tried this yet, but I'd expect you could make as
many digital copies as you wished from your own recordings, since the
copyright flag would not be set. Correct me if I'm wrong.


...//..
. filip hajny // [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
... http://swnet.cz ...
//.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS question

2000-01-11 Thread Magic


From: P. Grover Cleveland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: MD: SCMS question


>
> Newbie question: If I make a field recording using an analog microphone,
> may I may a duplicate of that MD digitally? That is, play the MD in a
> player and link digitally to a recorder.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Grover

Yes, you can do that no problem at all. What you *cant* do is then make a
digital copy of that copy.
If your original recording is on disc "A" you can digitally copy it to
another disk, "B".
You can't make a digital copy of "B" onto another disk "C" although you can
using analogue.
You could make a digital copy from "A" to "C".

Hope this helps!


Magic
--
"Creativity is more a birthright than an acquisition, and the power of sound
is wisdom and understanding applied to the power of vibration."

Location : Portsmouth, England, UK
Homepage : http://www.mattnet.freeserve.co.uk
EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS question

2000-01-11 Thread P. Grover Cleveland


Newbie question: If I make a field recording using an analog microphone,
may I may a duplicate of that MD digitally? That is, play the MD in a
player and link digitally to a recorder.

Thanks in advance.

Grover

-- 
P. Grover Cleveland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Managing Director 
Llareggub & District Light Railway

"Trekking down the information goat path."
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: scms

1999-11-30 Thread David W. Tamkin


Simon Mackay wrote,

| The MDS-W1 double-MD deck and some CD-MD combo decks have an analogue
| fallback path where the signal is recorded as an analogue signal through
| this path or as a digital-direct signal.

Right.  That of the W1 is buggy, though: it looks at only the is-a-copy bit
and not at the copyright bit, so given SCMS-unlimited material, it makes an
analog transfer.  It offers other ways to copy from one disc to another that
do follow the full SCMS specification, though, so it's easily worked around.

| Also the SCMS firmware may support an extra copy generation when the digital
| source is a digital broadcast receiver such as a digital satellite tuner or
| DAB tuner. This exception is well documented with Sony digital-recording
| decks in their SCMS explanation page; and with Philips DCC decks (because of
| the DSR system that was being promoted in Europe at the time of the DCC).

Some people with digital receivers, notably Ralf Kuchenhart, tried to look
into that and to figure out the difference between tuners that allow an extra
generation and those that do not (Sony's diagram in MD recorder manuals that
explains SCMS acknowledges that the second-generation copy is not possible
with some tuners), and no one came up with the answer.  There is no SCMS
value that means `antepenultimate'; the penultimate MD recordings made from
satellite broadcasts have something to do with the source medium code or with
the sampling rate conversion.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: scms

1999-11-29 Thread Simon Mackay


=BEGIN QUOTE===
Each segment of each track has its own SCMS status regardless of other
tracks
on the disc or other segments in the track.  If you are playing a whole disc
straight through and copying digitally to another MD, SCMS will make the
target unit pause during uncopyable segments but will allow it to record
during copyable segments.
=END QUOTE==
The MDS-W1 double-MD deck and some CD-MD combo decks have an analogue
fallback path where the signal is recorded as an analogue signal through
this path or as a digital-direct signal. If you use the easy-copy functions
in these decks, the units engage in SCMS-driven path-routing where the
content segments that are marked SCMS-final is copied via the analogue path
while other segments are copied using a digital-direct path.

Also the SCMS firmware may support an extra copy generation when the digital
source is a digital broadcast receiver such as a digital satellite tuner or
DAB tuner. This exception is well documented with Sony digital-recording
decks in their SCMS explanation page; and with Philips DCC decks (because of
the DSR system that was being promoted in Europe at the time of the DCC).

With regards,

Simon Mackay

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: scms

1999-11-29 Thread David W. Tamkin


Brent Harding asked,

| What is the idea of this scms thing?

To impede copyright violations, theoretically.  It subverts its own purpose
just about as often as it promotes it.

| I'm thinking about getting an md
| recorder, and want maximum time possible to record long shows, does that
| just mean if I use the digital inputs as sources, I can't copy the disc?

No.  First of all, you can't use the digital inputs as sources when you're
recording actual sound waves in the air (unless you use a digitizing micro-
phone or an outboard ADC, but unless the outboard ADC or the digitizing
microphone's ADC is enormously superior to the MD recorder's ADC, that's
just a silly thing to do, because of SCMS), so your recording of the show
will always allow one generation of further digital copying.

Digital transfers are only for copying material that is already digitized:
from a CD, a DAT, another MD, a DCC, or a digital satellite tuner.

Usually, if you want to make a lot of copies, you'll keep copying your
earliest-generation source.  Say you have an MD and want to make six copies:
you'll copy the first one six times.  You won't copy it once, copy the second
to make the third, copy the third to make the fourth, etc.  So unless you're
in a trading tree extended generations don't usually come about.  For people
in trading trees, there are SCMS strippers and some tricks one can use, but
one thing about MD is that ATRAC is a lossy compression system, so with each
generation (especially the first MD recorded from the uncompressed source)
there is some slight infidelity, and MD trading trees aren't very deep. 
(Even that has exceptions, for there are professional-grade duplicators that
copy the ATRACked data bit-for-bit without decompressing and recompressing.)

| Why would you need this, maybe the analog is better because you can copy it.

Sometimes; a lot depends on the particulars of the situation.

| What if you have a mixture on the same disc?

Each segment of each track has its own SCMS status regardless of other tracks
on the disc or other segments in the track.  If you are playing a whole disc
straight through and copying digitally to another MD, SCMS will make the
target unit pause during uncopyable segments but will allow it to record
during copyable segments.

| Do md recorders let you copy discs onto each other?

If you use two units or a dual deck, yes.  Within a single-disc unit, no.

| What is this feature I hear about called test mode for anyways?

For seeing and changing internal firmware parameters, and for getting
yourself into trouble if you haven't yet learned what you're doing.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: scms

1999-11-28 Thread brent harding


What is the idea of this scms thing? I'm thinking about getting an md
recorder, and want maximum time possible to record long shows, does that
just mean if I use the digital inputs as sources, I can't copy the disc?
Why would you need this, maybe the analog is better because you can copy
it. What if you have a mixture on the same disc? Do md recorders let you
copy discs onto each other?
What is this feature I hear about called test mode for anyways?




-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS on CD-R???

1999-10-21 Thread Wallace Choi


 === The original message was multipart MIME===
 === All non-text parts (attachments) have been removed ===

Hey guys,=20

i just borrowed a cd from a friend and i tried to record it via a =
Optical out on my cd player to my portable..
and it said "NO COPY" and made like 7 tracks but all like 1 sec long or =
whatever..
so  i looked at the Disc and it's a MAXELL CD-R74MU which is the MUSIC =
only CD-R's which i guess
was made on a cd recorder deck for stereo's not a computer one. do =
these CD-R decks pass SCMS on or does
it make the SCMS bits on the CD-R?? hope you guys can help. guess i =
can just rip all these songs to my h/d
and recorder thru my hoontech digital output :)


Wallace

 === MIME part removed : text/html; ===

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS Stripper - Audio Alchemy DTI

1999-10-21 Thread Matt X Herbison


Hello.  I saw a recent post regarding scsm strippers and thought that the
following eBay auction would be of interest to some of those on this list.

http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=183042891

Sorry for any intrusion.  -Matt 
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS on CD-R???

1999-10-21 Thread Tony Keogh


Wallace Choi wrote:

> i just borrowed a cd from a friend and i tried to record it via a =
> Optical out on my cd player to my portable..
> and it said "NO COPY" 

Yes.  Those "consumer" CD recorders add SCMS.




-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and DVD's

1999-08-31 Thread Kade Hansson


At 05:43 PM 8/31/99 +1000, Col wrote:
>
>Andres Mino wrote:
>
>>Hi, I heard that the ProspecMSP730 Digital Signal Processor do NOT decode
>>the protection that DVD digital audio has.
>
>The only protection that the digital output of a DVD player has from
>recording is SCMS.  If you are playing a DVD audio disc and find that you
>can't record it, either it is SCMS final in which case a stripper will fix
>it, it is a sample rate that your recorder cannot handle, or it is a
>compressed format such as DTS or AC-3.  Most DVD players can downsample 96
>KHz audio for S/PDIF output, and can decode AC-3 2.0 to normal 2 channel
>LPCM, which will then be recordable by your MD deck.  If the DVD contains
>three or more channels of audio and the player is outputting the raw coded
>data, you'll need a digital amp with the facility to decode, downmix, and
>digitally output the sound in order to record it.

And just to add that all DVD video discs I have tried prohibit digital
audio copying. i.e. they are SCMS zero, even when conversion is done from
AC-3 to PCM, or when PCM is present on the disc. Of course, analogue copies
are possible, and with a 24 bit DAC rated for 96kHz, they would be pretty
good analogue copies. (Recorder permitting, naturally.)

-- 
Archer
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/6413/

End.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and DVD's

1999-08-31 Thread Colin Burchall


Andres Mino wrote:

>Hi, I heard that the ProspecMSP730 Digital Signal Processor do NOT decode
>the protection that DVD digital audio has.

The only protection that the digital output of a DVD player has from
recording is SCMS.  If you are playing a DVD audio disc and find that you
can't record it, either it is SCMS final in which case a stripper will fix
it, it is a sample rate that your recorder cannot handle, or it is a
compressed format such as DTS or AC-3.  Most DVD players can downsample 96
KHz audio for S/PDIF output, and can decode AC-3 2.0 to normal 2 channel
LPCM, which will then be recordable by your MD deck.  If the DVD contains
three or more channels of audio and the player is outputting the raw coded
data, you'll need a digital amp with the facility to decode, downmix, and
digitally output the sound in order to record it.

-cb

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS and DVD's

1999-08-30 Thread Andres Mino


Hi, I heard that the ProspecMSP730 Digital Signal Processor do NOT decode
the protection that DVD digital audio has.

Does anybody knows a way to go around that protection from the Digitial
Output of a DVD player to record on a MD using a standard TOSLink??

Is the only answer to use standard RCA analog connections??

Your feedback would be greatly appreciated...

Regards,
AM

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS

1999-08-24 Thread schuster
ata had a "time code" like 8mm's
R.C. Time code.  Every frame would have the time attatched to it.
That would take up more space than the music itself.

 FOR THE SCMS on CD crowd the subcode block that  immediately
follows the 27 bit sync information, has 8 bits consisting of P, Q, R,
S, T, U, V, W.  The P bit tells the player whether there is data music
there or not.  It is 0 (zero) wherever there is music.  These serve as
flags to indicate the space between tracks.  They are usually 2 seconds.

 The Q channel (READ THIS HERE!!  PERTAINS TO SCMS ON CD's)
contains several functions.  1) control  2) Address 3) Q data 4) Error
detection code.  The 3rd bit in the control channel part of the Q data
channel (which consists of 98 bit chunks gather 1 bit at a time from
the frames) is the COPY BIT.  When it is set to 0 NO COPY.  When it is
set to 1 COPY PERMIT.


-Seth

p.s.  if you really want to know all there is to know get the book The
Compact Disc Handbook by Ken Pohlmann.  There are all sorts of diagram
as to what I am saying.
_
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-----
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _
   
   See the FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) for further details of the
   MiniDisc Mailing List.
   
   See the MiniDisc Community Page for more general MiniDisc information.

   MD: SCMS info (no opinions, just info)
 _
   
   From Seth Lacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date Fri, 24 Apr 1998 18:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
   Reply-To [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _
   
First off SCMS had a provision made for it in the very beginning all
they way back to the first CD's.  Copy protection bits are in the
red-book CD format decided on in 1980.  To clarify all this stuff that
I've seen about SCMS let me share the information that is sitting on
the SPDIF (Sony/Philips Digital Interface Format) spec sheet.

The SCMS data is not two bits next to each other.  SCMS is contained
in bits 0, 2 and 15 of the control word that is in the 98 bit subcode
block found on all digital audio devices.  Bit 0 must be set to 0
indicating a consumer interface.  Bit 2 is a copyright bit.  Second
generation copying can't occur if the bit is 0.  (Almost all CD's are
apparently set to 0)  Bit 15 indicates whether the program is original
or copied.  A CD player outputs 0 for itself about a cd, but a MD/DAT
records a 1.  All other category codes other than CD (defined in bits
8-14) work the opposite.  When a CD (with bit2 = 0 and bit 15 = 0  is
copied digitally, with bit 0 = 0 (on consumer equiptment), the data
from the cd is thought of as original and 1 copy is allowed.  The
recorder will set bit 15 to 0, marking it as copied, preventing a
copy.  If the CD's bit15 = 1 than no copied are allowed.  If the CD's
bit2 = infinite copies are allowed.

-Seth

I will post the entire SPDIF subcode block later.
_
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _
   
   See the FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) for further details of the
   MiniDisc Mailing List.
   
   See the MiniDisc Community Page for more general MiniDisc information.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS

1999-08-21 Thread Joost de Meij


Hi all, just a question:

How is SCMS-information stored on CD's and pre-recorded MD's?

Tanx... Joost ->Don't mind my grammar...


__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS, and 76 minute cd's

1999-08-10 Thread Kade Hansson


At 11:26 AM 8/10/99 -0500, DWT wrote:

>If the EP is on a digital medium, yes, it is possible that its SCMS bits were
>set for unrestricted recopying.

EP is a left over term from the vinyl days. It is used these days to mean a
short album, usually of seven or eight three to four minute tracks.
Typically they are rare or unrelated materials that have been compiled
together. Live EPs are also common.

>There are ways to tweak the CD standard to fit in up to about 81 minutes.
>Many of the CDs in my collection exceed 79 minutes (though copying them to
>a 74m59s MD would be no problem as almost all of those include some mono
>material).
>
>Somewhere on the net there used to be a page listing the longest CDs, and
>some exceeded eighty minutes.

Except that once my Sony Midi system listed the length of a regular 74
minute CD as 80:08. I tried again, and it came to its senses. :-)

-- 
Archer
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/6413/

End.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: SCMS, and 76 minute cd's

1999-08-10 Thread Tony Antoniou


You are correct. The copy will have the same bits as the original so it
won't affect the burn (it never does) but it will affect recording via
S/PDIF connections.

Adios,
LarZ

---  TAMA - The Strongest Name in Drums  ---


-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of PrinceGaz
Sent:   Wednesday, 11 August 1999 6:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:    Re: MD: SCMS, and 76 minute cd's


I think I know the answer to this but will ask anyway-- can SCMS final discs
be copied onto another CD using a CD-R(W) drive?  I'd be using something
like Adaptec Direct CD or Adaptec Easy CD Creator software that came with
the CD-RW drive (can't remember which one does a disk copy just now)

My guess is I get an exact copy of the disc and SCMS is irrelevant to the
copy
action, but SCMS status is preserved in the copy so the new disc will have
the
limitations of the original.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS, and 76 minute cd's

1999-08-10 Thread PrinceGaz


I think I know the answer to this but will ask anyway-- can SCMS final discs
be copied onto another CD using a CD-R(W) drive?  I'd be using something
like Adaptec Direct CD or Adaptec Easy CD Creator software that came with
the CD-RW drive (can't remember which one does a disk copy just now)

My guess is I get an exact copy of the disc and SCMS is irrelevant to the copy
action, but SCMS status is preserved in the copy so the new disc will have the
limitations of the original.

Cheers,
PrinceGaz -- "if it harms none, do what you will"

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://website.lineone.net/~princegaz/
ICQ: 36892193

From: Tony Antoniou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If the SCMS bits haven't been set to "no copy", then it will allow a copy of
> the CD's contents. In the case of V2 whose CD's are set to no copy rather
> than copy-once, that's where the problem arises. When burning a copy of the
> CD, rather than copying a mirror image, you would have to extract all tracks
> to your HD and then make an audio CD from those tracks. That way, SCMS
> doesn't even come into the picture. That's how you would circumvent it,
> aside from getting an SCMS defeater.



-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS, and 76 minute cd's

1999-08-10 Thread David W. Tamkin


Benk wrote,

| I made a copy CD copy of Beastie Boys Root Down EP. It was made on Ricoh(I
| think) CD burner. Im not sure the exact process used, but anyway, I can
| make digital copies to MD from this CD copy.  I thought that SCMS prevented
| this. Either I am mistaken or, the Beastie Boys didn't set their SCMS.

Is the Ricoh a standalone CD recorder, or is it a computer peripheral?  If
it's a computer peripheral, then it is not subject to SCMS (nor protected
from suit under the AHRA).

And in what format was the EP?  In my youth an "EP" was a tightly-grooved
vinyl 45 that fit two songs on each side.  If you made the CD from an analog
signal, even obeying SCMS, the SCMS bits of the CD would properly be set to
allow one further generation of copying.  That would explain how you were
able to copy the CD to MD.

If the EP is on a digital medium, yes, it is possible that its SCMS bits were
set for unrestricted recopying.

| Also, I recently bought Ramones Mania, and when I put it into the CD player
| it said it was 76 minutes long.  I thought maybe it was some mistake, so I
| copied it to MD and sure enough, it wouldn't fit.

There are ways to tweak the CD standard to fit in up to about 81 minutes.
Many of the CDs in my collection exceed 79 minutes (though copying them to
a 74m59s MD would be no problem as almost all of those include some mono
material).

Somewhere on the net there used to be a page listing the longest CDs, and
some exceeded eighty minutes.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: SCMS, and 76 minute cd's

1999-08-10 Thread Tony Antoniou


If the SCMS bits haven't been set to "no copy", then it will allow a copy of
the CD's contents. In the case of V2 whose CD's are set to no copy rather
than copy-once, that's where the problem arises. When burning a copy of the
CD, rather than copying a mirror image, you would have to extract all tracks
to your HD and then make an audio CD from those tracks. That way, SCMS
doesn't even come into the picture. That's how you would circumvent it,
aside from getting an SCMS defeater.

Adios,
LarZ

---  TAMA - The Strongest Name in Drums  ---


-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Tuesday, 10 August 1999 23:49
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:MD: SCMS, and 76 minute cd's


I made a copy CD copy of Beastie Boys Root Down EP. It was made on Ricoh(I
think) CD burner. Im not sure the exact process used, but anyway, I can make
digital copies to MD from this CD copy.  I thought that SCMS prevented this.
Either I am mistaken or, the Beastie Boys didn't set their SCMS. BTW I'm
using a Technics 6-CD changer, and an MZ-r30, through an optical connection.

Also, I recently bought Ramones Mania, and when I put it into the CD player
it said it was 76 minutes long.  I thought maybe it was some mistake, so I
copied it to MD and sure enough, it wouldn't fit.

If anyone has any comments on these subjects, I would appreciate it.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS, and 76 minute cd's

1999-08-10 Thread Thabenksta


I made a copy CD copy of Beastie Boys Root Down EP. It was made on Ricoh(I think) CD 
burner. Im not sure the exact process used, but anyway, I can make digital copies to 
MD from this CD copy.  I thought that SCMS prevented this. Either I am mistaken or, 
the Beastie Boys didn't set their SCMS. BTW I'm using a Technics 6-CD changer, and an 
MZ-r30, through an optical connection.

Also, I recently bought Ramones Mania, and when I put it into the CD player it said it 
was 76 minutes long.  I thought maybe it was some mistake, so I copied it to MD and 
sure enough, it wouldn't fit.

If anyone has any comments on these subjects, I would appreciate it.

Benk
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and digital radio receivers

1999-08-05 Thread Steven Brooks


Strange...
What's the bloody point of having a digital music station that you can't
record off of?  "just to listen to" ? ha!

I assume you can have an indirect source monitoring the signal and then
record it (analog)?


-sb -> Wondering why anyone would ever actively *choose* to listen to
Muzak...



Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Steven Brooks/HOME_OFF/AGLIFE)
Subject:  Re: MD: SCMS and digital radio receivers


On Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:47:08 +1000 "Simon Mackay"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

/|\/|\ 1) A DSS receiver with SP-DIF output tuned to a Music Choice or
similar service /|\/|\

  A lot of people I know have checked on this and they have all reported
that, regardless of service (MusicChoice on DirecTV, Muzak on DiSH or
Galaxie on that Canadian DBS), the receivers won't pass optical audio out
on the music only channels. However, all the other (poorer sounding)
channels all do allow audio output.

~Zach
o/~ she's sick of all the formula bands, for something not quite so bland
o/~
o/~ no more New Kids on the Block, she loves to hear the discobigrock o/~
o/~ her favourite band is Sonic Youth, well at least she tells the truth
o/~
o/~ the girls at school they love Take That, and Mark Owen is the name of
the cat, name of the cat o/~

___
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: SCMS and digital radio receivers

1999-08-05 Thread Andres Mino


Hi Simon,

FYI I have a Sony DSS SAT-A2 with a "Digital Out (Optical)". Let me quote
some lines on the manual:

"The digital audio output connector allows you to connect a digital audio
component that has a digital optical audio input connector, such as a
MiniDisc (MD) or digital audio tape (DAT) recorder. NOTE: The digital audio
component must have a digital input frequency of 48 kHz."

This DSS receiver is a second generation and I know that sony has released
already a fifth generation receiver with Dolby Digital but I am not sure if
it has optical outputs,  my thoughts from what I've heard is that they don't
put them anymore.

I've been able to record from MusicChoice a bunch of MD's with my R50
portable recorder and they sound really good.

Hope it helps...

Regards,
AM

-Original Message-
From: MD IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: MD: SCMS and digital radio receivers


On Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:47:08 +1000 "Simon Mackay"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

/|\/|\ 1) A DSS receiver with SP-DIF output tuned to a Music Choice or
similar service /|\/|\

  A lot of people I know have checked on this and they have all reported
that, regardless of service (MusicChoice on DirecTV, Muzak on DiSH or
Galaxie on that Canadian DBS), the receivers won't pass optical audio out
on the music only channels. However, all the other (poorer sounding)
channels all do allow audio output.

~Zach
o/~ she's sick of all the formula bands, for something not quite so bland
o/~
o/~ no more New Kids on the Block, she loves to hear the discobigrock o/~
o/~ her favourite band is Sonic Youth, well at least she tells the truth
o/~
o/~ the girls at school they love Take That, and Mark Owen is the name of
the cat, name of the cat o/~

___
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and digital radio receivers

1999-08-04 Thread Dewayne Hughes


>>>"the receivers won't pass optical audio out on the music only channels. However, 
>all the other (poorer sounding) channels all do allow audio output. <<<

I hate to argue, but this is untrue.  I have an RCA DSS, and I record Music Choice 
like it is going out of style!  I use the optical connector exclusively, so I know 
this works.

The recording artist should be jumping up and down that their songs get played on DSS, 
because only when something is broadcast digitally are they entitled to royalties 
under 17 USC 106(6).  The song author gets paid, too, of course.  Only the record 
companies are left out in the cold, which is why they fight tooth and nail against 
technologies like MP3, Music Choice, MDs, and DATs.  Death to the bourgeois!

dewayne

-

>>> MD IT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/04/99 02:25PM >>>

On Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:47:08 +1000 "Simon Mackay"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

/|\/|\ 1) A DSS receiver with SP-DIF output tuned to a Music Choice or
similar service /|\/|\

  A lot of people I know have checked on this and they have all reported
that, regardless of service (MusicChoice on DirecTV, Muzak on DiSH or
Galaxie on that Canadian DBS), the receivers won't pass optical audio out
on the music only channels. However, all the other (poorer sounding)
channels all do allow audio output. 

~Zach



-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MD: SCMS and digital radio receivers

1999-08-04 Thread MD IT


On Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:47:08 +1000 "Simon Mackay"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

/|\/|\ 1) A DSS receiver with SP-DIF output tuned to a Music Choice or
similar service /|\/|\

  A lot of people I know have checked on this and they have all reported
that, regardless of service (MusicChoice on DirecTV, Muzak on DiSH or
Galaxie on that Canadian DBS), the receivers won't pass optical audio out
on the music only channels. However, all the other (poorer sounding)
channels all do allow audio output. 

~Zach
o/~ she's sick of all the formula bands, for something not quite so bland
o/~
o/~ no more New Kids on the Block, she loves to hear the discobigrock o/~
o/~ her favourite band is Sonic Youth, well at least she tells the truth
o/~
o/~ the girls at school they love Take That, and Mark Owen is the name of
the cat, name of the cat o/~

___
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MD: SCMS and digital radio receivers

1999-08-04 Thread Simon Mackay


Hi everyone!

I have raised the SCMS and digital radio issue some time ago, as regards to
what is allowed under the logic.

I have read a few on-line manuals for MiniDisc equipment and some
manufacturers like JVC have not put the digital-radio situation into the
SCMS explanation section of the manual. Does this imply that these MiniDisc
units will blindly treat SP-DIF signals emanating from a digital radio tuner
as CD signals and therefore prohibit digital copying of the recording; or
will they allow for an extra recording generation as what is documented in
Philips and Sony digital recorder manuals.

Also, how does the SCMS logic treat a recording made from any of the
following new digital-radio situations:

1) A DSS receiver with SP-DIF output tuned to a Music Choice or similar
service

2) A DAB tuner with SP-DIF output, like the Arcam Alpha 10 DRT

3) A European DVB-based digital satellite receiver with SP-DIF output tuned
to a Music Choice or similar service or

4) Any "digital cable radio" box with SP-DIF output.

I am assuming the units are set up to record a "regular" music service
rather than a "premium" or "pay per listen" music service.

With regards,

Simon Mackay

-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MD: SCMS hacking on 520 and MD-MT15

1999-01-17 Thread Joost de Meij


Hi all!


>Now, on a 520 you can change the SCMS status of an existing >recording; 
>it's
>a slow, involved process, and I did it only once to see if it could >be 
>done.
>However, it works only on recordable MDs; if your source is an SCMS->final
>CD or an SCMS-final premastered MD (if such things exist), it won't >help.

I bought a 520 some months ago. How can i change the SCMS-status?


>hey, anyone have any experience with sharp's md-mt15? or know an >unbiased
>review source?

I got the MT15 some weeks ago, and i am very happy with it.
It has a good sound quality, all edit-functions (including name-stamp)
and Digital input, headphones out, and mic input. 24bit atrac, but
it comes without any accesoires (remote, adapter, battery).
The MT20 is about the same as the MD15, but it comes with all the
accesoires..

Greetz, Joost (Don't mind my bad English, i live in the Netherlands)
 ;-)

__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]