Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?
> Try formail; I think it can add missing From lines. > > (darren) > The Outlook file is formatted with the first line as, for example: From: John Q. Hacker If I execute formail -ds >new_mailbox, as per man formail, the new_mailbox has a first line of: >From John but stops there, not processing any other messages. As this is my first this is my first go with formail, I'm surely missing something. Any guidance will be appreciated. Thanks. -- John P. Verel Living Proof That Low Tech Beats High Tech!
Re: HTML Mail
Chad -- First, I should note that the proper address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than @gbnet. While mutt.org is hosted at gbnet and the address sometimes slips out, many here will only properly notice the message if it goes to the real address. ...and then skidley said... % ... % With lynx -force_html i get a full readable page, with links %s i get a % page more understandable than the default view but still with alot of % html code included. Would you or anyone know a similar option for links, % i cant seem to find one. Have you tried template to get the name to end in .html or such? I haven't played with it, but I'm sure it's in the archives, and maybe even for links. % -- % "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes % hurtling down the highway." -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum Ha. That's a relly good one. I can see it now, and I'm already thinking about the comparison! I wonder if he knows from experience... :-) % % Chad Young - Registered Linux User #195191 @ http://counter.li.org % --- % Linux localhost 2.4.19-pre5-ac3 #1 Sat Apr 6 00:30:47 AST 2002 i686 GenuineIntel % 6:35pm up 0:10, 2 users, load average: 0.15, 0.07, 0.04 HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27086/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
Kai -- ...and then Kai Weber said... % % + Dan Sully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: % % > > mailboxes `find Mail -type f` % > % > If you are using procmail - this script might be useful. % > % > #!/usr/bin/perl -w % > [...] % % Nice idea and sure helps a lot. But in my .procmailrc nearly no folder % name is used. Most of the stuff is done by $MATCH. Yeah, I wondered how some of the more procmail-aware people would deal with that. % % But a script for doing "subscribe" and "list" informations for .muttrc % would be nice. ... % folder-hook regexp source "settings_file_according_to_match" % % The line above should be the only folder-hook line that does it all. It % is impossible, as far as I see. The $match cannot be used in a script I % guess?!) No, but your entire muttrc could be source "/some/cool/script|" and you could have that cool script look thru your procmail file(s) and define your hooks, including a default hook, as well as do everything else... % % Kai. HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27085/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: tricky limiting
Jeremy, et al -- ...and then Jeremy Blosser said... % % On Apr 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: % > % > Aha! I didn't realize that tagging would go beyond limits. It's manual, % > but it will work. % % Tagging won't necessarily go beyond limits, it's <*-thread> commands that A... I get it. % go beyond limits. Because of this "feature" you could just limit to % messages with your message ids in the references header and then That's a possibility. And since I mark anything I want to keep with an X-Label: that will make excluding those from a deletion easy... Hey, I just might get this thing cleaned out :-) Hey, does anyone have a diffmail so I can see what changes in my test mailbox? :-) % delete-thread on those messages. % % I don't like that this works, but in your case it appears to be useful. Yeah, same here on both counts. It's somehow wrong, but I'll use it to my advantage :-) :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27084/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: tricky limiting
On Apr 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > ...and then Bruno Postle said... > % Go to the first message and press ttt etc.. until you've > % tagged all the threads. Then limit to show all tagged messages: > > Aha! I didn't realize that tagging would go beyond limits. It's manual, > but it will work. Tagging won't necessarily go beyond limits, it's <*-thread> commands that go beyond limits. Because of this "feature" you could just limit to messages with your message ids in the references header and then delete-thread on those messages. I don't like that this works, but in your case it appears to be useful. msg27083/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: HTML Mail
> > I have this: > > > > [ian@buzz:~]$ cat .mailcap > > text/html; /usr/bin/links %s > > > > and these in .muttrc > > set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap" > > auto_view text/html > > For lynx I have:- > > text/html; lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal; > > I don't use auto_view or any settings in my muttrc and the mailcap works > fine, however if you set it explicitly look at use_mailcap > > Could be a permissions issue with mutt being unable to read the mailcap > file of course. > With lynx -force_html i get a full readable page, with links %s i get a page more understandable than the default view but still with alot of html code included. Would you or anyone know a similar option for links, i cant seem to find one. -- "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway." -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum Chad Young - Registered Linux User #195191 @ http://counter.li.org --- Linux localhost 2.4.19-pre5-ac3 #1 Sat Apr 6 00:30:47 AST 2002 i686 GenuineIntel 6:35pm up 0:10, 2 users, load average: 0.15, 0.07, 0.04
New version of post mode for emacs
Hi, post has finally reached version 2.0. Don't let the .0 scare you, it hasn't been rewritten from scratch or anything like that. If you haven't used it before, it is an emacs mode that has a lot of features, both useful and fanciful, for composing email and news messages with external user agents like mutt and slrn. Get it here: http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/mutt/#emacs For the initiated: * A bug fix! It no longer deletes forwarded content when you change the signature. * New feature: it can now get signature quotes from a strfile (i.e. fortune) formatted file. The reason why this is good is given on the web page. -- "Never use while sleeping." - warning with hair dryer, US News & World Report Robert I. Reid | PGP/GPG Keys: http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/pgp.html
Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
+ Dan Sully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > mailboxes `find Mail -type f` > > If you are using procmail - this script might be useful. > > #!/usr/bin/perl -w > [...] Nice idea and sure helps a lot. But in my .procmailrc nearly no folder name is used. Most of the stuff is done by $MATCH. But a script for doing "subscribe" and "list" informations for .muttrc would be nice. (For my own .muttrc which I just reorganize/start again I think of folder-hooks which load files with settings appending to the current folder. Let's say I go to the mutt-users folder. The folder-hook sources a script "mutt-users.rc" with all the settings. The question is: how to make a default-setting for folders where no "folderxy.rc exist"? folder-hook regexp source "settings_file_according_to_match" The line above should be the only folder-hook line that does it all. It is impossible, as far as I see. The $match cannot be used in a script I guess?!) Kai.
Re: Resending a message with Esc-e
On Apr 11, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IIRC mutt just sets the Fcc as for any "normal" mail. > > So what was fixed in 1.3.28? Resend-message now honors $record and fcc-hooks. Holger
Re: Resending a message with Esc-e
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 14:12:05 -0400]: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]: > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote: > > > > > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message > > > > > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd. > > > > > > > > This is a good question. I have been wondering this myself. It has > > > > > > This should be fixed in 1.3.28. > > > > Meaning that resending a message with esc-e will make a new entry in > > =sent, or whatever your FCC folder is? > > IIRC mutt just sets the Fcc as for any "normal" mail. So what was fixed in 1.3.28? -Ken
Re: Resending a message with Esc-e
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 14:12:05 -0400]: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]: > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote: > > > > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message > > > > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd. > > > > > > This is a good question. I have been wondering this myself. It has > > > > This should be fixed in 1.3.28. > > Meaning that resending a message with esc-e will make a new entry in > =sent, or whatever your FCC folder is? IIRC mutt just sets the Fcc as for any "normal" mail. Nicolas
Re: Resending a message with Esc-e
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote: > > > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message > > > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd. > > > > > > Why is that? How to fix? > > > > This is a good question. I have been wondering this myself. It has > > This should be fixed in 1.3.28. Meaning that resending a message with esc-e will make a new entry in =sent, or whatever your FCC folder is? -Ken
Re: Resending a message with Esc-e
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote: > > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message > > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd. > > > > Why is that? How to fix? > > This is a good question. I have been wondering this myself. It has This should be fixed in 1.3.28. Nicolas
Re: tricky limiting
Bruno -- ...and then Bruno Postle said... % % On Thu 11-Apr-2002 at 11:51:36AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > % > I keep the original, and then of course get my reply. Once the thread ... % > nothing else of value in the thread, then I want to delete it -- but % > to do that I have to be able to effectively limit my view to those % > threads. Do you follow? % % A context-limit ability would be _very_ useful. You can sort-of get the % same thing like this: Yeah. % % Limit to all messages To, Cc or From you: % % l~L 'david t-g' Hokay... % % Go to the first message and press ttt etc.. until you've % tagged all the threads. Then limit to show all tagged messages: Aha! I didn't realize that tagging would go beyond limits. It's manual, but it will work. Hmmm... Can one tag-prefix tag-thread, I wonder? No, it looks like not... % % l~T Right. % % -- % Bruno Thanks a bunch! :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27074/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Feature request: uncolor not only in index
* Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 12:02]: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: > > > That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself. > > > I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I > > > highlight the section headings like this: > > > > > > display-hook '~s "blips"' 'push "/\^[A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9 [:punct:]]*$^M"' > > > > > > These highlights disappear, however, whenever I search for something. > > > Being able to color and uncolor patterns in the pager would be a good > > > solution. > > > > Where does display-hook come from? I just built 1.3.28 and use > > 1.3.22.1 regularly and neither has it. I'm assuming it comes from a > > patch, but which one? > > I _think_ it's actually a message-hook? Yup, got it. Thanks. I was interested in the hook displayed above, which is why I was looking for display-hook in the first place. I noticed, though, that the above command jumps to the first occurance of the match, so my version adds a after the search. Here is an example, similar to the above: message-hook "~s 'pgp|gpg'" 'push "pgp|gpg"' This highlights "pgp" and "gpg" in messages with pgp or gpg in the subject. Thanks to all who helped. (darren) -- A theory is not accepted when it's critics are converted, but when they eventually die. -- Maxwell Plank
[OT] cc: poster vs reply-only-to-list
* On 2002.04.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Simon White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 11-Apr-02 at 12:55, Ian Chilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > > Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists. > > > Participation is expected, not > > > just one way communication. > > > > Actually, the custom is to reply to the person and CC to the list :-) > > Not on this list, if I take precedents I have seen from other members to > be the netiquette for this list... begin 755 soapbox I haven't noticed this list to be different from any other in this regard, except that Sven is rabid about this topic and posts to this list a lot. The sweeping convention over all I've ever seen is to reply to the list and to the poster. If the poster doesn't like that, the poster can use duplicate ID processing, or MFT headers, or whatever to evade the duplicates -- but in any case, it's not divine manifest never to cc: the poster. Moreover, I'm not sure how custom on a particular list means that you shouldn't cc: a person who asked to be cc:ed. If this were a different list, you would cc: him upon request? The reasons for wanting to be copied are several (or many), and are not limited to "I'm not on the list" -- which would, IMO, be sufficient reason to comply anyway. I don't particularly want to harp on it any more than usual, but I had to take exception to the idea that this list is different from others. end -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
Re: tricky limiting
On Thu 11-Apr-2002 at 11:51:36AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > > The specific case is my mutt-users folder. When I reply to a message > I keep the original, and then of course get my reply. Once the thread > dies I still have the original and my reply, but by now it's two pages > back in the index. If the case is closed, so to speak, and there was > nothing else of value in the thread, then I want to delete it -- but > to do that I have to be able to effectively limit my view to those > threads. Do you follow? A context-limit ability would be _very_ useful. You can sort-of get the same thing like this: Limit to all messages To, Cc or From you: l~L 'david t-g' Go to the first message and press ttt etc.. until you've tagged all the threads. Then limit to show all tagged messages: l~T -- Bruno
Re: gpg sign/verify problems
Eduardo -- ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said... % % I recently upgrade from 1.2.5i to 1.3.28i (thanks mutt-users). % Now, when i try to sign a message, i get the following error % % gpg: can't mmap pool of 16384 bytes: Invalid argument - using malloc Hmmm... % % i see the same message in the verified and not verified signatures. I % was using gnupg 1.0.6 with previous version of mutt without problems. % Any hints? If you can still use gpg from the command line, what were and are your mutt gpg commands? If you still have the 1.2 binary, does it still work? % % -- % Eduardo Gargiulo % ejg(at)ar.homelinux.org HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27070/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
gpg sign/verify problems
I recently upgrade from 1.2.5i to 1.3.28i (thanks mutt-users). Now, when i try to sign a message, i get the following error gpg: can't mmap pool of 16384 bytes: Invalid argument - using malloc i see the same message in the verified and not verified signatures. I was using gnupg 1.0.6 with previous version of mutt without problems. Any hints? -- Eduardo Gargiulo ejg(at)ar.homelinux.org msg27069/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mails are always tagged as old but unread
* Am Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:39:47AM -0500 , schrieb David T-G:
> % Is anybody interested in reading it ? (154 lines)
>
> Sure.
>
>
So here it comes: (my procmailrc)
LOGFILE=/home/chris/.procmail.log
LOGABSTRACT="all"
VERBOSE="yes"
#Backup
:0 c
Mail/backup
:0 ic
| cd backup && rm -f dummy `ls -t msg.* | sed -e 1,32d`
# Damit GPG/PGP Header richtig sind
:0
* !^Content-Type: message/
* !^Content-Type: multipart/
* !^Content-Type: application/pgp
{
:0 fBw
* ^-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
* ^-END PGP MESSAGE-
| formail \
-i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt"
:0 fBw
* ^-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
* ^-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
* ^-END PGP SIGNATURE-
| formail \
-i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign"
}
:0hc
| lbdb-fetchaddr
:0:
* ^From.*Mailer-Daemon
Mail/system
:0:
* ^From.*uucp@marvin
Mail/marvin
:0:
* ^Return-path.*root@trillian
Mail/system
:0:
* ^Subject.*MailStatistics
Mail/system
:0:
* ^Subject.*rhizom
Mail/rhizom
:0:
* ^Reply-To: party-l
Mail/party-l
:0:
* ^List-Id:.*gnupg-users.gnupg.org
Mail/gnupg-users
:0:
* ^List-Id.*inferno-l.inferno.nadir.org
Mail/inferno-l
# -- doesn't work yet -
# hiermit werden alle Absender nach inferno-l.list geschrieben, wenn sie noch
# nicht drin stehen. (hoffentlich)
#:0 Whc:
#* ^List-Id.*inferno-l.inferno.nadir.org
#| formail -rD 8192 inferno-l.cache
# :0 ehc
# | formail -x From >> /home/chris/inferno-l.list
:0:
* ^List-Id.*imc.inferno.nadir.org
Mail/imc
:0:
* ^List-Id.*wohnprojekt-l
Mail/wohnprojekt-l
:0:
* ^List-Id.*sz-info.inferno
Mail/sz-info
:0:
* ^List-Id.*alle.inferno.nadir.org
Mail/alle
:0:
* ^From.*heise.de
Mail/telepolis
:0:
* ^From.*support@inferno
Mail/support
:0:
* ^From.*todo@inferno
Mail/todo
:0:
* ^From.*inhaltliches@inferno
:0:
* ^List-Id:.*szwww-l.inferno.nadir.org
Mail/szwww-l
:0:
* ^To:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail/szwww-l
:0:
* ^Mailing-List:.*lists.ccc.de
Mail/debate
:0:
* ^List-ID.*connect.squat.net
Mail/connect
:0:
* ^List-ID.*ccc-l
Mail/ccc-l
:0:
* ^List-Id.*gentoo-user.gentoo.org
Mail/gentoo-user
:0:
* ^List-Id.*automail-l
Mail/automail-l
:0:
* ^List-Id.*keysignings.lists.alt.org
Mail/keysignings
:0:
* ^Sender:.*mutt-users
Mail/mutt-users
:0:
* ^List-Id.*technix-l
Mail/technix-l
Have fun with it
Christoph
Re: tricky limiting
Rob -- ...and then Rob Reid said... % % At 9:29 AM EDT on April 11 David T-G sent off: % > I recall some discussions of this but I don't think I've ever seen it % > work. I'd like to limit to entire threads for any in which I've taken % > part. % % For many people that would be tricky but fortunately for you it's just "l." % ;-> *grin* % % For lurkers it would be "l!." (untested). Heh. % % Seriously though, it might be time to use procmail. First collect a list of % all the oldest parent (i.e. thread starting) M-IDs from all of your messages % (this might be possible from mutt) and procmail anything referencing or % matching one of those M-IDs into a new folder. This takes up more disk space % than a limit, but you can delete it when you're done. Well, that's not really what I need... The specific case is my mutt-users folder. When I reply to a message I keep the original, and then of course get my reply. Once the thread dies I still have the original and my reply, but by now it's two pages back in the index. If the case is closed, so to speak, and there was nothing else of value in the thread, then I want to delete it -- but to do that I have to be able to effectively limit my view to those threads. Do you follow? % % -- % "It is man's relation to the cosmos - to the unknown - which alone arouses in % me the spark of creative imagination." --- H.P. Lovecraft % Robert I. Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/ % PGP Key: http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/pgp.html TIA & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27067/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: OT: what is the optimum number of keyrings?
Rob, et al -- ...and then Rob Reid said... % % At 8:33 AM EDT on April 11 David T-G sent off: % > No problem. This used to work for me before I started playing with % > folder-hooks, and it still works even though it doesn't put the key into % > the target ring as I'd like (I have lots of keyrings). % % I'm just curious...what advantage is there to splitting up your keyring? It makes things more manageable for me, and reminds me of how I know this person. All of my mutt-user friends' keys are in pubring.mutt.gpg, and so on. If I ever unhook from a list, I can pretty quickly purge my key collection of keys relating to that list rather than carrying around the baggage forever. Similarly, I have all of my old keys in a ring by themselves; they're available in case I want to read my old encrypted messages or if someone encrypts to me with an old key, but I don't see them on a regular basis. It also shortens my listings if I'm looking for something in particular; I have a $GNOPG alias defined which points to /dev/null instead of the options file and then I feed in the keyring I wish to use for the lookup. % % -- % "I have no particular talent. I am merely inquisitive." - Albert Einstein % Robert I. Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/ % PGP Key: http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/pgp.html :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27066/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: I've broken something
Rafael -- ...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said... % % Quoting Rafael C. Gawenda, Wed Apr 10 10:25:37 +0200 2002 (CEST) % % > Of course, I've the src package and patches handy, it's not lazyness, but if % > it is the config, then is where I'm a little lost. % % FYI: % It was (of course) my fault, and it was a simple config mistake... Ah. So I guess you can ignore my other reply :-) % Many thanks to all who have replied, but it were anyway usefull messages, % I've learnt some usefull things and hints. Good! % % bind index º quit #I've had another 'exit' command here :( Ah. Yes, there is a difference! :-) HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27065/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: tricky limiting
At 9:29 AM EDT on April 11 David T-G sent off: > I recall some discussions of this but I don't think I've ever seen it > work. I'd like to limit to entire threads for any in which I've taken > part. For many people that would be tricky but fortunately for you it's just "l." ;-> For lurkers it would be "l!." (untested). Seriously though, it might be time to use procmail. First collect a list of all the oldest parent (i.e. thread starting) M-IDs from all of your messages (this might be possible from mutt) and procmail anything referencing or matching one of those M-IDs into a new folder. This takes up more disk space than a limit, but you can delete it when you're done. -- "It is man's relation to the cosmos - to the unknown - which alone arouses in me the spark of creative imagination." --- H.P. Lovecraft Robert I. Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/ PGP Key: http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/pgp.html
Re: I've broken something
Rafael -- ...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said... % % Quoting David T-G (Wed Apr 10 14:10:19 CEST 2002) % % > Are you using the stock mutt that you've had all along, or did you % > just breed a new mutt? In the latter case, whether you chose to use % > mutt_dotlock or have mutt do the locking itself, does the proper binary % > have the permissions to do so? % % The problem showed up after setting a new debian 2.2r5 with separate % partitions for /usr /home and /var Interesting. Separate partitions shouldn't matter, and a fresh system should have everything right but I suppose it might not. % % > Show us what % % Sorry for haven't done that before 0:-) No problem :-) % Just made a backup, and installed Debian package for woody (1.3.28i) Hmmm... So does that mean you're working with the mutt that had the problem or a different mutt? And, if the latter, do you still have the problem? % % > mutt -v % > ls -lF `which mutt` `which mutt_dotlock` % % -v details attached (was that a bad idea?) Not IMHO. % Previosly: % -rwxr-xr-x 1 rgawenda rgawenda 1447035 Apr 10 07:55 /usr/bin/mutt* % -rwxr-sr-x 1 rgawenda mail7108 Feb 17 2000 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock* % Current: % -rwxr-xr-x 1 rgawenda rgawenda 523660 Mar 19 20:50 /usr/bin/mutt* % -rwxr-sr-x 1 rgawenda mail7248 Mar 19 20:50 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock* Hokay; those both look good. % % rgawenda is UID,GID=0 Whoa -- rgawenda is your root user? % mail user is: uid=1000(ais) gid=1000(ais) groups=1000(ais) Interesting, but I suppose that will do. What's the difference between group mail listed above and group ais listed here, though? So what are the permissions on your spool directory (be that /var/spool/mail or $HOME or elsewhere) and spoolfile? % % > give you. In addition, when you're in mutt, does the top line have a % > percent in up in the left corner? When you toggle-write (bound by % > default to '%'), do you get the message that changes will and won't be % > written, or does the percent sign silently stay up there? % % I'm using no help line, and bottom status line, which shows no '%' sign % visible, unless I hit it one time (which tells me that mode changed to % rean-only (ie. hanges will not be written, or so). Hokay; that's good. If you can turn read-only back off then that part is all fine. % % > % msg is still there (instead of being moved to +mbox), and marked as New... % > % Has somebody seen a similar behaviour? % % > Yes -- when mutt_dotlock can't lock your mailbox. % % I've just tried (by hand) locking a mbox, and mutt complains and reads it % RO, after prompting to remove locks, or RW if I let it remove the locks. OK; that's good. Now what about your spool mailbox, if that's the one about which we're talking? % % If I enter the mbox, read, force a sync ($), and quit, it does update. Um, OK. Now I'm confused again. I thought you said that sync didn't work. Maybe you should outline the difficulty for me again... % % -- % Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com % 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 % Life's unfair - but root password helps! (BOFH?) :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27063/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 12:24]: > Well, in my best low tech manner, I think I've come up with something > of promise. What I did was: > > 1) Select all the messages in the inbox or outbox. 2) Perform > File|Save As and save the entire contents as a text file. > > These big text files open fine with vim. When I get home, I may have > to fiddle with the From header to get things right. But, this may > work. > > I'll report back. Try formail; I think it can add missing From lines. (darren) -- The biggest difference between time and space is that you can't reuse time. -- Merrick Furst
Re: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation: > > These big text files open fine with vim. When I get home, I may have to fiddle with >the From header to get things right. But, this may work. That'll be easy. One line of Perl or shell, most likely. -- Shawn McMahon| Information may want to be free, but fiber http://www.eiv.com | optic cable wants to be one million US AIM: spmcmahonfedex, smcmahoneiv | dollars per mile. msg27061/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?
Well, in my best low tech manner, I think I've come up with something of promise. What I did was: 1) Select all the messages in the inbox or outbox. 2) Perform File|Save As and save the entire contents as a text file. These big text files open fine with vim. When I get home, I may have to fiddle with the From header to get things right. But, this may work. I'll report back. John Original Message: - From: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:39:30 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use? John -- ..and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % % I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within No, you haven't :-) .. % % As tomorrow is my last day with access to Outlook and these files, there is a % bit of urgency to this. If you don't like any of the methods already posted (eg Mozilla importing), since you're there with LookOut! and your exchange server, why not just use outhouse to copy the messages back up to your server and then use mutt to pull them down via IMAP? That worked dandily for me when I had my first few months of mail all stuck in .pst files before finally getting mutt built and installed where I was working... % % Thanks. HTH & HAND and next time start thinking about this sooner :-) % % John :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
OT: what is the optimum number of keyrings?
At 8:33 AM EDT on April 11 David T-G sent off: > No problem. This used to work for me before I started playing with > folder-hooks, and it still works even though it doesn't put the key into > the target ring as I'd like (I have lots of keyrings). I'm just curious...what advantage is there to splitting up your keyring? -- "I have no particular talent. I am merely inquisitive." - Albert Einstein Robert I. Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/ PGP Key: http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/pgp.html
Re: I've broken something
Quoting Rafael C. Gawenda, Wed Apr 10 10:25:37 +0200 2002 (CEST) > Of course, I've the src package and patches handy, it's not lazyness, but if > it is the config, then is where I'm a little lost. FYI: It was (of course) my fault, and it was a simple config mistake... Many thanks to all who have replied, but it were anyway usefull messages, I've learnt some usefull things and hints. bind index ºquit #I've had another 'exit' command here :( bind pager ºexit bind compose º exit bind attach º exit The point was using a single 'escape' key, but as the real key is a prefix, I had to choose 'º', which, on spanish layout keybs, is located under Esc, right before '1'. At least I managed to get charsets/iconv/locales running fine (after some minutes of RTFM). Sorry :-) -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches (Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO) msg27058/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: I've broken something
Quoting David T-G (Wed Apr 10 14:10:19 CEST 2002) > Are you using the stock mutt that you've had all along, or did you > just breed a new mutt? In the latter case, whether you chose to use > mutt_dotlock or have mutt do the locking itself, does the proper binary > have the permissions to do so? The problem showed up after setting a new debian 2.2r5 with separate partitions for /usr /home and /var > Show us what Sorry for haven't done that before 0:-) Just made a backup, and installed Debian package for woody (1.3.28i) > mutt -v > ls -lF `which mutt` `which mutt_dotlock` -v details attached (was that a bad idea?) Previosly: -rwxr-xr-x 1 rgawenda rgawenda 1447035 Apr 10 07:55 /usr/bin/mutt* -rwxr-sr-x 1 rgawenda mail7108 Feb 17 2000 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock* Current: -rwxr-xr-x 1 rgawenda rgawenda 523660 Mar 19 20:50 /usr/bin/mutt* -rwxr-sr-x 1 rgawenda mail7248 Mar 19 20:50 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock* rgawenda is UID,GID=0 mail user is: uid=1000(ais) gid=1000(ais) groups=1000(ais) > give you. In addition, when you're in mutt, does the top line have a > percent in up in the left corner? When you toggle-write (bound by > default to '%'), do you get the message that changes will and won't be > written, or does the percent sign silently stay up there? I'm using no help line, and bottom status line, which shows no '%' sign visible, unless I hit it one time (which tells me that mode changed to rean-only (ie. hanges will not be written, or so). > % msg is still there (instead of being moved to +mbox), and marked as New... > % Has somebody seen a similar behaviour? > Yes -- when mutt_dotlock can't lock your mailbox. I've just tried (by hand) locking a mbox, and mutt complains and reads it RO, after prompting to remove locks, or RW if I let it remove the locks. If I enter the mbox, read, force a sync ($), and quit, it does update. -- Rafael C. Gawenda, rgawenda/at/pobox/dot/com 2:348/610@fidonet; GnuPG key: 0x5C4839A5; Registered LiNUX User #93375 Life's unfair - but root password helps! (BOFH?) Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13) Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux 2.2.17 (i586) [using ncurses 5.2] Compile options: -DOMAIN -DEBUG -HOMESPOOL +USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK +USE_POP +USE_IMAP -USE_GSS -USE_SSL +USE_GNUTLS +USE_SASL +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM +HAVE_PGP -BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +COMPRESSED +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET ++HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_GETSID +HAVE_GETADDRINFO ISPELL="/usr/bin/ispell" SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" MAILPATH="/var/mail" PKGDATADIR="/usr/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/etc" EXECSHELL="/bin/sh" MIXMASTER="mixmaster" To contact the developers, please mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To report a bug, please use the flea(1) utility. patch-1.5.tlr.mx_open_append.2 patch-1.3.27.bse.xtitles.1 patch-1.3.26.appoct.3 patch-1.3.15.sw.pgp-outlook.1 patch-1.3.27.admcd.gnutls.19 Md.use_editor Md.paths_mutt.man Md.muttbug_no_list Md.use_etc_mailname Md.muttbug_warning Md.gpg_status_fd patch-1.3.24.rr.compressed.1 patch-1.3.25.cd.edit_threads.9.1 patch-1.3.23.1.ametzler.pgp_good_sign msg27057/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Feature request: uncolor not only in index
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: > Where does display-hook come from? I just built 1.3.28 and use > 1.3.22.1 regularly and neither has it. I'm assuming it comes from a > patch, but which one? It was a patch for the 1.2 series. I'm using patch-1.2.bj.display-hook.2. I assumed that it would be applied to the 1.3 series, but I haven't followed the development branch features very closely. I think the name may have changed to message-hook in 1.3, but I don't really know. HTH, Gary -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Spokane, Washington, USA http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |
Re: compile errors
If don't provide us with some basic information, I won't expect an answer. Eduardo Gargiulo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > I'm STILL trying to compile mutt-1.3.28i, but the process failed with the > following error: > > --- 8< --- > pgp.c: In function `disable_coredumps': > pgp.c:70: variable `rl' has initializer but incomplete type > pgp.c:70: warning: excess elements in struct initializer after `rl' > pgp.c:70: warning: excess elements in struct initializer after `rl' > pgp.c:70: storage size of `rl' isn't known > pgp.c:75: warning: implicit declaration of function `setrlimit' > pgp.c:75: `RLIMIT_CORE' undeclared (first use in this function) > pgp.c:75: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > pgp.c:75: for each function it appears in.) > pgp.c:70: warning: unused variable `rl' > make[1]: *** [pgp.o] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src//mutt-1.3.28' > make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > --- 8< --- > > i get the same error with 1.3.27i version and i want pgp support. > is there someone in the list that points me how to solve this problem? Which OS, compiler, compiled against which libs, etc? Michael -- "I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you." (By Vance Petree, Virginia Power) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: Feature request: uncolor not only in index
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: > > That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself. > > I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I > > highlight the section headings like this: > > > > display-hook '~s "blips"' 'push "/\^[A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9 [:punct:]]*$^M"' > > > > These highlights disappear, however, whenever I search for something. > > Being able to color and uncolor patterns in the pager would be a good > > solution. > > Where does display-hook come from? I just built 1.3.28 and use > 1.3.22.1 regularly and neither has it. I'm assuming it comes from a > patch, but which one? I _think_ it's actually a message-hook? -- Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg27054/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: compile errors
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:52:45PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm STILL trying to compile mutt-1.3.28i, but the process failed with the > following error: What's your environment? Operating system+version, compiler+version? It appears that you're missing the resource limit declarations. On both my Linux Mandrake 7 and Solaris 7 systems, those are found in the include file , but it appears that they're not in that file on your system, so you may have to add a #include to pgp.h. The other possibility is that the declarations are in that file, but configure script wasn't able to determine that such a file exists. But since it makes that determination by actually trying to compile a C program with the line #include , that's unlikely. > --- 8< --- > pgp.c: In function `disable_coredumps': > pgp.c:70: variable `rl' has initializer but incomplete type > pgp.c:70: warning: excess elements in struct initializer after `rl' > pgp.c:70: warning: excess elements in struct initializer after `rl' > pgp.c:70: storage size of `rl' isn't known > pgp.c:75: warning: implicit declaration of function `setrlimit' > pgp.c:75: `RLIMIT_CORE' undeclared (first use in this function) > pgp.c:75: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > pgp.c:75: for each function it appears in.) > pgp.c:70: warning: unused variable `rl' > make[1]: *** [pgp.o] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src//mutt-1.3.28' > make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > --- 8< --- > > i get the same error with 1.3.27i version and i want pgp support. > is there someone in the list that points me how to solve this problem? > > TIA > > -- > Eduardo Gargiulo > ejg(at)ar.homelinux.org -- Mark REED| CNN Internet Technology 1 CNN Center Rm SW0831G | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Atlanta, GA 30348 USA | +1 404 827 4754 -- Banacek's Eighteenth Polish Proverb: The hippo has no sting, but the wise man would rather be sat upon by the bee.
Re: Feature request: uncolor not only in index
* Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 10:22]: [-- snip --] > That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself. > I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I > highlight the section headings like this: > > display-hook '~s "blips"' 'push "/\^[A-Z0-9][A-Z0-9 [:punct:]]*$^M"' > > These highlights disappear, however, whenever I search for something. > Being able to color and uncolor patterns in the pager would be a good > solution. Where does display-hook come from? I just built 1.3.28 and use 1.3.22.1 regularly and neither has it. I'm assuming it comes from a patch, but which one? (darren) -- I accept chaos. I'm not sure whether it accepts me. I know some people are terrified of the bomb. But then some people are terrified to be seen carrying a modern screen magazine. Experience teaches us that silence terrified people the most. -- Bob Dylan
Re: compile errors
Hi all. I'm STILL trying to compile mutt-1.3.28i, but the process failed with the following error: --- 8< --- pgp.c: In function `disable_coredumps': pgp.c:70: variable `rl' has initializer but incomplete type pgp.c:70: warning: excess elements in struct initializer after `rl' pgp.c:70: warning: excess elements in struct initializer after `rl' pgp.c:70: storage size of `rl' isn't known pgp.c:75: warning: implicit declaration of function `setrlimit' pgp.c:75: `RLIMIT_CORE' undeclared (first use in this function) pgp.c:75: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once pgp.c:75: for each function it appears in.) pgp.c:70: warning: unused variable `rl' make[1]: *** [pgp.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src//mutt-1.3.28' make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 --- 8< --- i get the same error with 1.3.27i version and i want pgp support. is there someone in the list that points me how to solve this problem? TIA -- Eduardo Gargiulo ejg(at)ar.homelinux.org
Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
Hi, * darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-11 16:03]: >If the problem is the newlines, as someone suggested, give this a try: > > mailboxes `echo \`find ~/Mail -type f -print\`` > >which gives me a full list with no newlines. This can also be done with xargs(1), see my other mail in this thread. Thorsten -- Nichts ist schwerer und erfordert mehr Charakter, als sich in offenem Gegensatz zu seiner Zeit zu befinden und zu sagen: Nein! - Kurt Tucholsky
Re: "Don't reply to me" does not work?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:35:46AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > % but it seems when I use 'g' to reply to an email, I still get another copy. > % Since I am already using "Fcc", so I ended up with two copies of my reply. > % > % What is the wrong here? > > mutt has to know who you are before it can know to not reply. Do you > have $alternates set up correctly? > Right on target - Thanks. :-) Jun
Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?
John -- ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % % I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within No, you haven't :-) ... % % As tomorrow is my last day with access to Outlook and these files, there is a % bit of urgency to this. If you don't like any of the methods already posted (eg Mozilla importing), since you're there with LookOut! and your exchange server, why not just use outhouse to copy the messages back up to your server and then use mutt to pull them down via IMAP? That worked dandily for me when I had my first few months of mail all stuck in .pst files before finally getting mutt built and installed where I was working... % % Thanks. HTH & HAND and next time start thinking about this sooner :-) % % John :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27048/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: "Don't reply to me" does not work?
Jun -- ...and then Jun Sun said... % % Hi, Hello! % % I have set the following: % % # don't reply to myself % set metoo=no % % but it seems when I use 'g' to reply to an email, I still get another copy. % Since I am already using "Fcc", so I ended up with two copies of my reply. % % What is the wrong here? mutt has to know who you are before it can know to not reply. Do you have $alternates set up correctly? % % Thanks. HTH & HAND % % Jun :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27047/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
"Don't reply to me" does not work?
Hi, I have set the following: # don't reply to myself set metoo=no but it seems when I use 'g' to reply to an email, I still get another copy. Since I am already using "Fcc", so I ended up with two copies of my reply. What is the wrong here? Thanks. Jun
Re: HTML Mail
begin Patrick quotation: > > Actually, the custon is and SHOULD-BE: reply to list and ONLY CC to > person if asked. We certainly do not want to receive posts twich > without requesting such action. IMHO, it should be "reply to list, and let the guy who refuses to join the list use the archives, that's what they're there for." -- Shawn McMahon| Information may want to be free, but fiber http://www.eiv.com | optic cable wants to be one million US AIM: spmcmahonfedex, smcmahoneiv | dollars per mile. msg27045/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?
11-Apr-02 at 10:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within > Outlook to do this. They give the following choices for converted format: > > -Comma seperated values (DOS) > -Comma seperated values (Windows) > -dBase > -Microsoft Access > -Microsoft Excel > -Microsoft FoxPro > -Tab Seperated Values (DOS) > > Which of these will work best to ultimately get into mbox format? None of the above. Better tools to do the job were discussed on the list today. Those values from Outlook look more like conversions for Address Books than mailboxes. -- [Simon White. vim/mutt. [EMAIL PROTECTED] GIMPS:67.00% see www.mersenne.org] The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet. [Linux user #170823 http://counter.li.org. Home cooked signature rotator.]
browsing Maildir folders - how?
I have a Maildir ~/Mail. I created an experimental directory ~~/Mail/artax to test forder name matching. If I browse folders and get into this folder, selecting .. opens =artax/.. . Change folder puts me into the same dir (~/Mail/artax) again, and again. I set record=~/Mail/Sent. Now if I'm in the Sent folder and want to change folders I'm put into its parent ~/Mail. Selecting Sent opens it. How do I check if it has any subfolders? I know, ls -AF Mail/Sent | sed -n '/\<\(cur\|new\|tmp\)\/$/d;/\/$/p' is my friend.. -- Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook pst import: What file format should I use?
I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within Outlook to do this. They give the following choices for converted format: -Comma seperated values (DOS) -Comma seperated values (Windows) -dBase -Microsoft Access -Microsoft Excel -Microsoft FoxPro -Tab Seperated Values (DOS) Which of these will work best to ultimately get into mbox format? As tomorrow is my last day with access to Outlook and these files, there is a bit of urgency to this. Thanks. John mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
Re: IMAP browsing
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:02:06AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Michael -- > > ...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said... > % > ... > % > % set spoolfile="$HOME/Mail" > % set mbox_type=Maildir > % set record=$HOME/Mail/Sent > > This is interesting. The spoolfile setting looks like what you would > actually have for $folder, especially since $record is a mailbox under $spoolfile is something like /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME which is undesirable - causes errors. > that folder. Should $spoolfile really be $HOME/Mailbox or something > similar, or do you actually have > > $HOME/ > Mail/ > cur/ > tmp/ > new/ > Sent/ > cur/ > tmp/ > new/ > > which may or may not work (I don't think that Maildir is designed to have > not only messages but "subfolders" in the same plce)? This is what I have and it works except subfolders should start with a dot (ie .Sent) to be accessible trough courier-imap for Mozilla. > > > % > % account-hook . unset imap_user imap_force_ssl > % folder-hook . set [EMAIL PROTECTED] > % account-hook artax set imap_force_ssl=yes imap_user=msuc8339 > % folder-hook artax set [EMAIL PROTECTED] > % account-hook dec59 set imap_force_ssl=no imap_user=suchanek > % folder-hook dec59 set [EMAIL PROTECTED] > % > % macro index \Csa ":set folder=imaps://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/mailc?" > % macro index \Csu ":set folder=imap://dec59.ruk.cuni.czc?" > % macro index \Csl ":unset folderc?" > % - > % > % It doesnt work. You can switch to an imap account but once there you > % can't switch anywhere else. I tried folder=~/Mail for local first but it > % makes no difference. > > Instead of unsetting your folder for your local macro, set it back to > your local mail dir (usually $HOME/Mail but that's tough to tell above). I tried: no diff - see above-^ > > > % Another problem is I lose the checking for new mail. > > Use a "mailboxes" line to define where you want mutt to look. I thought > I saw one in an earlier mail from you... AFAIK it has to be turned off to make any use of $folder for browsing. > > > HTH & HAND I suspect we have exhausted all the possibilities for now but I appreciate your help anywawy. I think I can use Mozilla when I really want to browse all my mailboxes at once :-) > > > :-D > -- > David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles > (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie > (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! > -- Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HTML Mail
11-Apr-02 at 12:55, Ian Chilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists. > > Participation is expected, not > > just one way communication. > > Actually, the custom is to reply to the person and CC to the list :-) Not on this list, if I take precedents I have seen from other members to be the netiquette for this list... > > however if you set it explicitly look at use_mailcap > > I can't find any reference to use_mailcap in the muttrc or man muttrc - > where is it please? In the manual, /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt by default. > That's what I thought, but i'm running everythign as user ian, which is > who owns .mailcap: > > [ian@buzz:~]$ ls -la .mailcap > -rw-r--r-- 1 ian users 30 Apr 10 14:19 .mailcap Exactly the same permissions I have. Is links in the $PATH? -- [Simon White. vim/mutt. [EMAIL PROTECTED] GIMPS:66.97% see www.mersenne.org] UNIX is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity. -- Dennis Ritchie [Linux user #170823 http://counter.li.org. Home cooked signature rotator.]
[hramrach@centrum.cz: browsing Maildir folders - how?]
- Forwarded message from Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:25:59 +0200 From: Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mutt Users' list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: browsing Maildir folders - how? Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users' list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i I have a Maildir ~/Mail. I created an experimental directory ~/Mail/artax to test forder name matching. If I browse folders and get into this folder, selecting .. opens =artax/.. . Change folder puts me into the same dir (~/Mail/artax) again, and again. I set record=~/Mail/Sent. Now if I'm in the Sent folder and want to change folders I'm put into its parent ~/Mail. Selecting Sent opens it. How do I check if it has any subfolders? I know, ls -AF Mail/Sent | sed -n '/\<\(cur\|new\|tmp\)\/$/d;/\/$/p' is my friend.. - End forwarded message - -- Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
+ Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >What's wrong with that and how should i tune my settings? > I use > mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type f -print | grep -Ev '(admin|postponed|archiv)' | >xargs` Thank you all for your tips. Seems I forgot to set the mailboxes relativly to $HOME. Now it seems to work. And Thorsten's idea to leave out some mailboxes with an inverted grep is very good. Now I can go on configuring the beast. I have to find an easy way to cleanup/archiving the mailboxes... Kai.
Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 09:44]: > * Kai Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020411 14:32]: > > I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a > > structure like that: > > Mail/list/mutt-users > > Mail/list/debian-users > > Mail/mail/inbox > > Mail/mail/private > > ... > > Have you tried > > mailboxes `echo ~/Mail/*/*` That assumes he only has one level of subdirectories, but he mentioned ~/Mail/lists/mutt-users/2002-04 (or similar), so that's not necessarily true. If the problem is the newlines, as someone suggested, give this a try: mailboxes `echo \`find ~/Mail -type f -print\`` which gives me a full list with no newlines. The nested backticks are ugly; if you are on a machine where your shell is bash (or bash disguising itself as /bin/sh) try: mailboxes `echo $(find ~/Mail -type f -print)` Although that's completely untested, it seems that it would work if the shell understands the $() syntax, since everything in `` is passed to the shell. (darren) -- How you look depends on where you go.
Re: IMAP browsing
Michael -- ...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said... % ... % > I would recommend a couple of macros which reset $folder so that you can % > quickly change from local to remote and back. % % This is what I set up: % % % set spoolfile="$HOME/Mail" % set mbox_type=Maildir % set record=$HOME/Mail/Sent This is interesting. The spoolfile setting looks like what you would actually have for $folder, especially since $record is a mailbox under that folder. Should $spoolfile really be $HOME/Mailbox or something similar, or do you actually have $HOME/ Mail/ cur/ tmp/ new/ Sent/ cur/ tmp/ new/ which may or may not work (I don't think that Maildir is designed to have not only messages but "subfolders" in the same plce)? % % account-hook . unset imap_user imap_force_ssl % folder-hook . set [EMAIL PROTECTED] % account-hook artax set imap_force_ssl=yes imap_user=msuc8339 % folder-hook artax set [EMAIL PROTECTED] % account-hook dec59 set imap_force_ssl=no imap_user=suchanek % folder-hook dec59 set [EMAIL PROTECTED] % % macro index \Csa ":set folder=imaps://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/mailc?" % macro index \Csu ":set folder=imap://dec59.ruk.cuni.czc?" % macro index \Csl ":unset folderc?" % - % % It doesnt work. You can switch to an imap account but once there you % can't switch anywhere else. I tried folder=~/Mail for local first but it % makes no difference. Instead of unsetting your folder for your local macro, set it back to your local mail dir (usually $HOME/Mail but that's tough to tell above). % Another problem is I lose the checking for new mail. Use a "mailboxes" line to define where you want mutt to look. I thought I saw one in an earlier mail from you... % Note I had to specify imaps: manually, otherwise I had to login twice. Don't know anything about that one. % % -- % Michal Suchanek % [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27036/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: I've broken something
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 09:27]: > * darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 15:19:58 -0400]: > > If you like pain, try stracing a mutt session: > > strace -o /tmp/mutt.out mutt > > Actually, vim has very passable syntax highlighting for strace output > files...saved me a lot of headaches. Just name the file *.strace and > open it in vim (I'm not sure if the .strace extension is necessary, I > just always use it and I know it worked with that). You're right, it is pretty good. Just running :set ft=strace will be enough, if the extension is not .strace. (darren) -- Don't create a problem for which you do not have the answer.
Re: IMAP browsing
> Michael -- > > ...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said... > % > ... > % Thank you for your responses. If I understand what you are writing, you > % all advise me to swich from browsing local folders by defalt to browsing > % remote folders by default. > > At least when you want to look at remote folders, anyway. > > > % That differs from the behavior I'd like to achieve. I want mutt to show > % the tree in which the folder that is currently open can be located so > % that I can select its sibling or subfolder. Writing the whole URL is > > Fair enough. > > > % quite a bit of typing, thus I do not consider this an easy way. > % I set up mailboxes to point to all my accounts following another > % advice to get easy access to all of them using c. > > I would recommend a couple of macros which reset $folder so that you can > quickly change from local to remote and back. This is what I set up: set spoolfile="$HOME/Mail" set mbox_type=Maildir set record=$HOME/Mail/Sent account-hook . unset imap_user imap_force_ssl folder-hook . set [EMAIL PROTECTED] account-hook artax set imap_force_ssl=yes imap_user=msuc8339 folder-hook artax set [EMAIL PROTECTED] account-hook dec59 set imap_force_ssl=no imap_user=suchanek folder-hook dec59 set [EMAIL PROTECTED] macro index \Csa ":set folder=imaps://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/mailc?" macro index \Csu ":set folder=imap://dec59.ruk.cuni.czc?" macro index \Csl ":unset folderc?" - It doesnt work. You can switch to an imap account but once there you can't switch anywhere else. I tried folder=~/Mail for local first but it makes no difference. Another problem is I lose the checking for new mail. Note I had to specify imaps: manually, otherwise I had to login twice. -- Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
* Kai Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020411 14:32]: > I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a > structure like that: > Mail/list/mutt-users > Mail/list/debian-users > Mail/mail/inbox > Mail/mail/private > ... Have you tried mailboxes `echo ~/Mail/*/*` ? -Johan -- Johan Almqvist http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
tricky limiting
Hi, all -- I recall some discussions of this but I don't think I've ever seen it work. I'd like to limit to entire threads for any in which I've taken part. I would think that for a given message one would either look for that M-ID: (if it started a thread) or the references (if it were a reply in a thread), but how to do that for all messages and all threads? TIA & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27032/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: I've broken something
* darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 15:19:58 -0400]: > If you like pain, try stracing a mutt session: > strace -o /tmp/mutt.out mutt Actually, vim has very passable syntax highlighting for strace output files...saved me a lot of headaches. Just name the file *.strace and open it in vim (I'm not sure if the .strace extension is necessary, I just always use it and I know it worked with that). -- hmm, doing all these one-line sigs reminds me of taglines in the BBS days msg27031/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Feature request: uncolor not only in index
* Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 14:52:24 +0200]: > So far so good. Currently it is impossible to remove that pattern > again. uncolor only works in the index. > Devellopers, any chance to change that? Once again I'd like to add my voice this feature. I see how you people are...I mention it 4 or 5 times and nobody says anything but now... :p Anyway, I think this would be great. I have a lot of different incoming mailboxes and certain strings have special significance if they come in from a particular source, that the same string doesn't have in other contexts; not being able to remove body/header colors means I wind up with a bunch of highlighted strings after I've been running for a while, which kinda defeats the purpose... By the way, Michael...would you mind asking for a feature where mutt will print the entire comment for the key being used to sign (in the "compose" screen) instead of just the Key ID? :pp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg27030/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: HTML Mail
Hello, > Try something like: > text/html; /usr/bin/links %s; copiousoutput OK, thanks Ian
Re: HTML Mail
At Thu, Apr 11 2002 [12:01 +0100], Ian Chilton aroused my curiosity with: > text/html; /usr/bin/links %s Try something like: text/html; /usr/bin/links %s; copiousoutput and read section 5.3 "MIME Viewer configuration with mailcap" in the manual. Tschoe, Steff
Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
Hi, * Kai Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-11 14:32]: >I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a >structure like that: > > Mail/list/mutt-users > Mail/list/debian-users > Mail/mail/inbox > Mail/mail/private I have something similar: Mail/in Mail/ML/Mutt Mail/ML/NEdit Mail/ML/Debian/user Mail/ML/Debian/misc etc. This also makes it easy to filter mailing lists with Mail::Audit. >But Mutt seems to have problems recognizing new mails in these folders >if I specify mailboxes like that: > > mailboxes `find Mail -type f` > >What's wrong with that and how should i tune my settings? I use mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type f -print | grep -Ev '(admin|postponed|archiv)' | xargs` Thorsten -- Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to using Windows for mission-critical applications.
Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
Kai -- ...and then Kai Weber said... % % Hi all, Hello! % % I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a % structure like that: % % Mail/list/mutt-users % Mail/list/debian-users % Mail/mail/inbox % Mail/mail/private % ... Not bad. % % (another idea I had was Mail/list/mutt-users/2002-04 but now I archive % my mails monthly by a cron job) Good idea. % % But Mutt seems to have problems recognizing new mails in these folders % if I specify mailboxes like that: % % mailboxes `find Mail -type f` % % What's wrong with that and how should i tune my settings? I haven't played with this in a while, but I seem to recall some issues with newlines coming up with the find method vs the echo method. Check the archives for mailboxes and see what you find. I know there are folks doing this sort of thing, but don't remember if there had to be some magic thrown in. Meanwhile, if the problem is mutt recognizing these folders at all, is it only when a new one gets created and you haven't restarted mutt? You might need to re-source your .muttrc file. Finally, if mutt really sees the folders but just never marks them as updated, look for any other mailchecking program -- biff, buffy, your shell, or who knows -- that is updating the last-access timestamp on the file; mutt compares last-access with last-modified and says the folder has been updated only if the former is later than the latter (if you'll forgive the tongue twister). You can test by using more ls options to compare them yourself, and even fake delivery by updating the mod time with touch. % % Thanks for your help and brainstorming HTH & HAND % Kai. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27026/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:32:11PM +0200, Kai Weber wrote: > But Mutt seems to have problems recognizing new mails in these folders > if I specify mailboxes like that: > > mailboxes `find Mail -type f` > > What's wrong with that and how should i tune my settings? could it be that you're specifying your mailboxes relative to your homedirectory, but not starting mutt from there? try "mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type f`" HTH! -- Dan Boger Linux MVP brainbench.com msg27025/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: IMAP browsing
Michael -- ...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said... % ... % Thank you for your responses. If I understand what you are writing, you % all advise me to swich from browsing local folders by defalt to browsing % remote folders by default. At least when you want to look at remote folders, anyway. % That differs from the behavior I'd like to achieve. I want mutt to show % the tree in which the folder that is currently open can be located so % that I can select its sibling or subfolder. Writing the whole URL is Fair enough. % quite a bit of typing, thus I do not consider this an easy way. % I set up mailboxes to point to all my accounts following another % advice to get easy access to all of them using c. I would recommend a couple of macros which reset $folder so that you can quickly change from local to remote and back. HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27024/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP: macro to fetch keys from keyserver?
Dominik -- ...and then Dominik Mierzejewski said... % % On Wednesday, 10 April 2002, David T-G wrote: % > % I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from % > % signed messages, like % > % % > % "gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY" % > % % > % But how can I get/define $KEY? % > % > Why reinvent the wheel? Just use $pgp_getkeys_command as found in % > your_pgp-gpg_version.rc in the contrib directory in the tarball. % % Funny how it never worked for me. Could you quote yours? Or at least % one that's working and doesn't invoke some script no-one has ever % heard of? No problem. This used to work for me before I started playing with folder-hooks, and it still works even though it doesn't put the key into the target ring as I'd like (I have lots of keyrings). I may have to set $p_g_c to point to /dev/null instead of the real options file; I haven't played with it yet (the catch-all-keys ring is listed last in my options file, and gpg appears to use whatever is last if it has its options file to check). [zero] [7:31am] ~> grep pgp_getkeys_command .mutt/gpg.rc ###set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring pubring.catch-all-keys.gpg %r 2>/dev/null" folder-hook . 'set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring pubring.catch-all-keys.gpg %r 2>/dev/null"' #folder-hook F.mutt 'set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring pubring.mutt.gpg %r 2>/dev/null"' folder-hook F.mutt 'set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --options /dev/null --no-verbose --keyring pubring.mutt.gpg --recv-keys %r 2>/dev/null"' folder-hook F.freenet 'set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring pubring.freenet.gpg %r 2>/dev/null"' folder-hook F.taxinfo 'set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring pubring.misclists.gpg %r 2>/dev/null"' [zero] [7:31am] ~> grep keyserver .gnupg/options keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net #keyserver wwwkeys.us.pgp.net #keyserver wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net #keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net #keyserver certserver.pgp.com #keyserver pgp.ai.mit.edu #keyserver keyserver.net #keyserver search.keyserver.net #keyserver pgp.dtype.org #keyserver gnv.us.ks.cryptnet.net % % -- % "The Universe doesn't give you any points for doing things that are easy." % -- Sheridan to Garibaldi in Babylon 5:"The Geometry of Shadows" % Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg27023/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Organizing mailfolders (strategies and using with mutt)
Hi all, I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a structure like that: Mail/list/mutt-users Mail/list/debian-users Mail/mail/inbox Mail/mail/private ... (another idea I had was Mail/list/mutt-users/2002-04 but now I archive my mails monthly by a cron job) But Mutt seems to have problems recognizing new mails in these folders if I specify mailboxes like that: mailboxes `find Mail -type f` What's wrong with that and how should i tune my settings? Thanks for your help and brainstorming Kai.
Re: From: per IMAP account doesnt work for me
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:57:12AM +0200, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote: > This is where I set from: > > account-hook . unset imap_user imap_force_ssl > account-hook . set [EMAIL PROTECTED] > account-hook artax set imap_force_ssl=yes imap_user=msuc8339 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > account-hook dec59 set imap_force_ssl=no imap_user=suchanek >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I get From: michal.suchanek@... when I start mutt w/o arguments. > When I start mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I get From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (my hostname) > > I think this is wrong. Or have I overlooked something? Now I have replaced some account-hooks with folder hooks and it generally works: account-hook . unset imap_user imap_force_ssl folder-hook . set [EMAIL PROTECTED] folder=$HOME/Mail account-hook artax set imap_force_ssl=yes imap_user=msuc8339 folder-hook artax set [EMAIL PROTECTED] folder="imap://dec59.ruk.cuni.cz" account-hook dec59 set imap_force_ssl=no imap_user=suchanek folder-hook dec59 set [EMAIL PROTECTED] folder="imap://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" -- Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HTML Mail
* Ian Chilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-11-02 07:11]: > Hello, > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists. > > Participation is expected, not > > just one way communication. > > Actually, the custom is to reply to the person and CC to the list :-) Actually, the custon is and SHOULD-BE: reply to list and ONLY CC to person if asked. We certainly do not want to receive posts twich without requesting such action. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 Registered at: http://counter.li.org
Re: HTML Mail
Hello, Thanks for the reply. > Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists. > Participation is expected, not > just one way communication. Actually, the custom is to reply to the person and CC to the list :-) > I don't use auto_view or any settings in my muttrc and the mailcap works > fine Interesting... > however if you set it explicitly look at use_mailcap I can't find any reference to use_mailcap in the muttrc or man muttrc - where is it please? > Could be a permissions issue with mutt being unable to read the mailcap > file of course. That's what I thought, but i'm running everythign as user ian, which is who owns .mailcap: [ian@buzz:~]$ ls -la .mailcap -rw-r--r-- 1 ian users 30 Apr 10 14:19 .mailcap Thanks Ian
Re: HTML Mail
11-Apr-02 at 12:01, Ian Chilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Hello, > > Please reply direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists. Participation is expected, not just one way communication. > I am trying to get HTML mails to display with links. > > I have this: > > [ian@buzz:~]$ cat .mailcap > text/html; /usr/bin/links %s > > and these in .muttrc > set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap" > auto_view text/html For lynx I have:- text/html; lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal; I don't use auto_view or any settings in my muttrc and the mailcap works fine, however if you set it explicitly look at use_mailcap Could be a permissions issue with mutt being unable to read the mailcap file of course. -- [Simon White. vim/mutt. [EMAIL PROTECTED] GIMPS:66.77% see www.mersenne.org] /"\ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ /Respect for open standards X No HTML/RTF in email / \No M$ Word docs in email
HTML Mail
Hello, Please reply direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am trying to get HTML mails to display with links. I have this: [ian@buzz:~]$ cat .mailcap text/html; /usr/bin/links %s and these in .muttrc set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap" auto_view text/html But I get this: mailcap entry for type text/html not found Any ideas? Thanks Ian
HTML Mail
Hello, Please reply direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am trying to get HTML mails to display with links. I have this: [ian@buzz:~]$ cat .mailcap text/html; /usr/bin/links %s and these in .muttrc set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap" auto_view text/html But I get this: mailcap entry for type text/html not found Any ideas? Thanks! Ian
Re: Setting of config var only temporarly
Michael Tatge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific > > email to be send? I want: > > > > pgp_create_traditionl=no > > ... > > send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA > > therefor set pgp_creat_traditional=yes > > send it > > ... > > now p_c_t=no again. > > > > send-hook does not work because it does not reset the variable back to > > previous state. > > You need a default send-hook to reset p_c_t > > send-hook . "set pgp_create_traditionl=no" > send [EMAIL PROTECTED] "set pgp_create_traditionl=no" s/send/send-hook/ of cause Michael -- PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: Resending a message with Esc-e
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-11-02 05:04]: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote: > > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message > > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd. > > > > Why is that? How to fix? > > This is a good question. I have been wondering this myself. It has > only come up for me being dreadfully unemployed, sending out my resume > an infinite amount of times. I needed to report on all I have sent > out for NY unemployment insurance, but had none from this venue due to > using resend-message. I use: macro index \ee "f\=outbox\n" "Edit to resend message with complete header macro pager \ee "f\=outbox\n" "Edit to resend message with complete header This will allow you to edit a msg in your fcc folder (including headers), post the msg and save the new copy in the fcc folder. NOTE: my fcc folder is =outbox -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 Registered at: http://counter.li.org
Re: Setting of config var only temporarly
Hi, * Michael Tatge [04/11/02 11:10:25 CEST] wrote: > Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific > > email to be send? I want: > > > > pgp_create_traditionl=no > > ... > > send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA > > therefor set pgp_creat_traditional=yes > > send it > > ... > > now p_c_t=no again. > > > > send-hook does not work because it does not reset the variable back to > > previous state. > You need a default send-hook to reset p_c_t > send-hook . "set pgp_create_traditionl=no" > send [EMAIL PROTECTED] "set pgp_create_traditionl=no" You mean: send-hook . "set pgp_create_traditionl=no" send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] "set pgp_create_traditionl=yes" ? Cheers, Rocco. msg27013/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Resending a message with Esc-e
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote: > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd. > > Why is that? How to fix? This is a good question. I have been wondering this myself. It has only come up for me being dreadfully unemployed, sending out my resume an infinite amount of times. I needed to report on all I have sent out for NY unemployment insurance, but had none from this venue due to using resend-message. -Ken
Resending a message with Esc-e
Hi! I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd. Why is that? How to fix? Regards, -Johan -- Johan Almqvist http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
Re: Setting of config var only temporarly
Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific > email to be send? I want: > > pgp_create_traditionl=no > ... > send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA > therefor set pgp_creat_traditional=yes > send it > ... > now p_c_t=no again. > > send-hook does not work because it does not reset the variable back to > previous state. You need a default send-hook to reset p_c_t send-hook . "set pgp_create_traditionl=no" send [EMAIL PROTECTED] "set pgp_create_traditionl=no" HTH, Michael -- PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
From: per IMAP account doesnt work for me
This is where I set from: account-hook . unset imap_user imap_force_ssl account-hook . set [EMAIL PROTECTED] account-hook artax set imap_force_ssl=yes imap_user=msuc8339 [EMAIL PROTECTED] account-hook dec59 set imap_force_ssl=no imap_user=suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get From: michal.suchanek@... when I start mutt w/o arguments. When I start mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (my hostname) I think this is wrong. Or have I overlooked something? -- Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting of config var only temporarly
Hi! Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific email to be send? I want: pgp_create_traditionl=no ... send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA therefor set pgp_creat_traditional=yes send it ... now p_c_t=no again. send-hook does not work because it does not reset the variable back to previous state. Is there someting similar? Please Cc: me answers since I am not subscribed. Thanks a lot. Best wishes Norbert --- Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> University of Technology Vienna, Austriagpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 --- Ford had his own code of ethics. It wasn't much of one, but it was his and he stuck by it, more or less. One rule he made was never to buy his own drinks. He wasn't sure if that counted as an ethic, but you have to go with what you've got. --- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
Re: IMAP browsing
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:10:14PM -0500, Dean Henrichsmeyer wrote: > set folder=imap://host.foo.com/folder_root > > Substitute the host and the folder_root with your information and you'll > browse your imap server by default. > > Dean > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:21:45PM +0200, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote: > > I think it would be a good idea if c gave me folder tree of my current > > account and not local folders. ie if I am viewing somebody@somewhere/INBOX > > c should give me imap://somebody@somewhere/, not ~/Mail (or whatever). > > The annoying behavior is observed in mutt-1.3.27i-4mdk. > > Or is there a simple way of browsing my IMAP account I have overlooked? > > Or prehaps there is a -devel list where this should be posted? > > Thank you for your responses. If I understand what you are writing, you all advise me to swich from browsing local folders by defalt to browsing remote folders by default. That differs from the behavior I'd like to achieve. I want mutt to show the tree in which the folder that is currently open can be located so that I can select its sibling or subfolder. Writing the whole URL is quite a bit of typing, thus I do not consider this an easy way. I set up mailboxes to point to all my accounts following another advice to get easy access to all of them using c. I'll try to attach my muttrc for you to examine it. It's quite small and fails in many unexpexted ways. -- Michal Suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] #set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" set spoolfile="$HOME/Mail" mailboxes $HOME/Mail imap://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz imap://dec59.ruk.cuni.cz set mbox_type=Maildir set move=no set sort=threads set sort_aux=reverse-last-date-received set pager_context=1 pager_index_lines=11 subscribe @linux-mandrake.com mutt-user account-hook . unset imap_user imap_force_ssl account-hook . set [EMAIL PROTECTED] account-hook artax set imap_force_ssl=yes imap_user=msuc8339 [EMAIL PROTECTED] account-hook dec59 set imap_force_ssl=no imap_user=suchanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] save-hook .*+saved-mail save-hook \[Cooker\] +linux-saved save-hook \[expert\] +linux-saved
