Re: mutt crashes -- 1.2.5 -> 1.4

2002-09-20 Thread Sven Guckes

* MindFuq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 15:43]:
> How do I upgrade mutt?

http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/install.php3

> I tried using rpm with the upgrade option, and
> it had a dependancy on libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2).
> Then when I tried to upgrade GLIBC,
> I got several screenfulls of other programs
> that require the old version that I'm using.
> I got the feeling I would have scrap
> everything and install the latest OS.

.. or install a stable version.

> If I go get the latest tarball, will that have the
> dependancy issue I ran into with the rpm file?

[40+ lines of fullquote]

if you have to tofu then please do not use mutt - thankyou.

> X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.1 HotFix 1.4 (built

the nerve..

> From: MindFuq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

.. and buy yourself a name!

Sven  [who should not answer people without a name]



Re: Display certain threads

2002-09-20 Thread David Champion

* On 2002.09.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
*   "Heiko Heil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Mutt Users,
> 
> what can I do in order to display all (and complete) threads which are
> initiated by myself && which are containing messages from me.

I'm not sure how to add in the second part of this, offhand. But you
could try a macro that does this:

  # collapse all threads, showing only the initial msg
~P   # limit to msgs from you
  # uncollapse, showing all msgs
   # tag all threads which are tagged
~T   # limit to tagged msgs
~T   # untag all tagged msgs

You could probably build on that to locate messages that don't contain
further messages from you, tag them, limit further, etc. But my brain
hurts now, so I'm not sure exactly how.

-- 
 -D.We establised a fine coffee. What everybody can say
 Sun Project, APC/UCCO  TASTY! It's fresh, so-mild, with some special coffee's
 University of Chicago  bitter and sourtaste. "LET'S HAVE SUCH A COFFEE! NOW!"
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Please love CAFE MIAMI. Many thanks.



charset input trouble

2002-09-20 Thread Robert Lillack

Hi,

I  have some  trouble  here getting  Mutt  to recognize  non
ASCII characters.  Displaying  them works wonderfully, other
console programs work fine, too (bash, vi, mc, irssi, ...).

The facts:

  Environment:
* FreeBSD 4-stable *
LANG=de_DE.ISO8859-1
LC_* unset

  Mutt:
* Mutt 1.4i from the FBSD port tree *
using SLANG (NCURSES doesn't work, too)
set allow_8bit
set use_8bitmime
set charset=iso-8859-15
set send_charset="us-ascii:iso-8859-15:utf-8"
set locale=de

Setting the  LC_ALL, LC_CTYPE or LANG  environment variables
to different  settings does not  help. I could not  find any
hints  in the  archive  or with  Google. Now I'm  stuck. Any
ideas?

Thanks, Rob.
-- 
r o b e r t | l i l l a c k
www.lillaxsitedesign.de/rob
secure mail key: 0xE7FFDF77



Display certain threads

2002-09-20 Thread Heiko Heil

Hello Mutt Users,

what can I do in order to display all (and complete) threads which are
initiated by myself && which are containing messages from me.

I thought about the limit(l)-feature (e.g. l ~L my@email), but I didn't
succeed... :-(
-- 
Best regards
Heiko



Re: [OT] Correct way to quote?

2002-09-20 Thread Markus Garschall

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:59:32AM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote:
> Actually, send a mail from Netscape Mail to mutt and you might find
> that those '|'s are actually '> 's.  I saw this on some mailer, maybe
> Apple Mail.  Really confusing, but that was the case.

Now I found out what confused me. I often send mail with an inline gpg
signature because I'm having friends whose muas are having problems
with MIME. My problem was that I had the option "Allow flowed text"
turned on in the Enigmail preferences. When sending an inline signed
mail with these preferences to mutt (or any other mua) the '|'s don't
disappear. After turning off this option everything works pertect.

Regards
Markus

-- 
- Markus Garschall - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
- GnuPG: 4B8D B75E D8F2 A13A BAD9 25E4 319F 90FB 93B7 70B8 ID:93B770B8 -
- My Pages: http://stud3.tuwien.ac.at/~e0125356/(gpg/93B770B8.gpg) --- -



Re: New mail to list.

2002-09-20 Thread Bernard Massot

On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:11:27PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Alex Polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-17 08:22]:
> > How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I
> > usually do  now is push "L" for list-reply the remove the body and
> > appropriate headers. 
> 
> I have this in my config:
> 
>   subscribe   mutt-users@
>   mailboxes   =lists/mutt-users 
>   folder-hook =lists/mutt-users "macro index m \"[EMAIL PROTECTED]\""
> 
>   subscribe   mutt-dev@
>   subscribe   @bugs.guug.de
>   mailboxes   =lists/mutt-dev 
>   folder-hook =lists/mutt-dev "macro index m \"[EMAIL PROTECTED]\""
> 
> When I hit m in my mutt folders, it executes the macro, with the
> appropriate stuff filled in.
> 
what would be nice would be to have a general config for all ML boxes
I'm thinking of something like that :
my conf is :
boxes tree : ~/Mail/ML/mutt-users, ~/Mail/ML/mutt-users-fr, ~/Mail/foo
...
~/.muttrc: folder-hook =ML "source ~/.mutt/muttrc-ML"
~/.mutt/muttrc-ML:
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bind index r list-reply
bind pager r list-reply
alias mutt-users International mutt ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
alias mutt-users-fr French mutt ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I need a macro like this : macro index m current_box_name
it would put "mutt-users" for example, then it would work thanks to the
alias
My question is : how can I get current_box_name ?
-- 
Bernard Massot



msg31091/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mutt crashes -- 1.2.5 -> 1.4

2002-09-20 Thread Keith R. John Warno

  - On Fri, 20.Sep.2002, 11:42EDT, MindFuq uttered:
> How do I upgrade mutt?  I tried using rpm with the upgrade option, and 
> it had a dependancy on libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2).  Then when I tried to 
> upgrade GLIBC, I got several screenfulls of other programs that require 
> the old version that I'm using.  I got the feeling I would have scrap 
> everything and install the latest OS.

No need to scrap everything.  Just go grab the source tarball and build
it yourself.  Or better yet you could use a spec file and build your own
mutt RPM which you could then install.  Doesn't look like the 1.4i
source tarball comes with a spec so you'd have to find on on the net
somewhere or write it yourself.

> If I go get the latest tarball, will that have the dependancy issue I 
> ran into with the rpm file?
> 

Not if you build mutt from source.

Ciao,
Keith.
-- 
"Isn't it time we care and lose the hate
 Understand our fears"
 -- Dream Theater, "Blind Faith"



Re: [OT] Forcing correct quotes

2002-09-20 Thread Phil Gregory

* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 16:40 +0200]:
> * Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 09:18]:
> > > Sven  [using sed as the display_filter
> > >to correct incorrect quoting]
> >
> > Care to share?
> 
> guckes.net/setup - as usual.

I don't see anything in there that looks appropriate.  Your muttrc files
reference both df.default and sed-default, but neither of those exists.
Your procmailrc does a lot of rewriting of emails, too, but it doesn't
seem to have anything about redoing quoting.  Which config file has the
appropriate settings?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / phil! / DNRC / http://www.geeksimplex.org/phil/
PGP:  ID: D8C75CF5  print: 0A7D B3AD 2D10 1099  7649 AB64 04C2 05A6
--- --
If you capture the hero's starship, keep it in the landing bay with the
ramp down, only a few token guards on duty and a ton of explosives set to
go off as soon as it clears the blast-range.
   -- Evil Overlord's Handbook, entry 116
 --- --



Re: $mail_check and $timeout

2002-09-20 Thread Gary Johnson

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 01:23:15PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote:

> Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two
> settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still
> don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a
> reason why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent?

The following explanation is based on general knowledge and observation
of mutt's behavior, not on any actual knowledge of mutt's internals.

When mutt finishes executing a function or command in response to user
input from the keyboard, it checks for new mail if it has been longer
than 'mail_check' seconds since the last time it checked.  So if you are
actively using mutt, it will check periodically for new mail, the period
being about 'mail_check' seconds.

However, if you are not giving mutt any commands, mutt is just sitting
there waiting for input and has no opportunity to check for new mail.
Mutt gets around this problem by having a keyboard inactivity timer that
is restarted every time mutt receives input from the keyboard and
otherwise times out 'timeout' seconds later.  When this timer times out,
mutt either:  a) effectively executes a noop function and again checks
for new mail if it has been longer than 'mail_check' seconds since the
last time it checked, or b) always checks for new mail.  I don't know
which of a) or b) is true since I've always had 'timeout' >=
'mail_check'.

If mutt is just sitting there and b) is true, mutt will check for new
mail every 'timeout' seconds.  If instead a) is true, mutt will check
for new mail at an interval that's between 'mail_check' and
'mail_check'+'timeout' seconds.  I have 'timeout' set to 10 and that's
been close enough for me.

HTH & HTA (Hope That's Accurate),
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson   | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Spokane, Washington, USA
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |



Re: [OT] Correct way to quote?

2002-09-20 Thread Ken Weingold

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002, Markus Garschall wrote:
> Since I'm using Netscape beside Mutt as Mailer, I wanted to know whether
> the old way to quote things in an E-Mail is the only correct one.
> 
> e.g.:
> > foo
> > foo
> 
> In the default-install Netscape does following:
> 
> | bar
> | bar

Actually, send a mail from Netscape Mail to mutt and you might find
that those '|'s are actually '> 's.  I saw this on some mailer, maybe
Apple Mail.  Really confusing, but that was the case.


-Ken




set pop_checkinterval

2002-09-20 Thread skidley

I can't seem to get set pop_checkinterval=60 to work. Is mutt suppose to
get the new messages or just check for them. In any case I am not notified
by mutt of any new messages available ever. I prefer to use mutt to
check mail as I only have one pop account and its much simpler to use
mutt instead of procmail, fetchmail and mutt.
-- 
"I mean they are gonna kill ya so like if ya give em a quick, short, sharp,
shock they won't do it again. Dig it! I mean he got off lightly cuz I would 
have given him a thrashing. I only hit him once. It was only a difference of 
opinion but really... I mean good manners don't cost nothin do they. Eh?"



Re: mutt crashes -- 1.2.5 -> 1.4

2002-09-20 Thread MindFuq

How do I upgrade mutt?  I tried using rpm with the upgrade option, and 
it had a dependancy on libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2).  Then when I tried to 
upgrade GLIBC, I got several screenfulls of other programs that require 
the old version that I'm using.  I got the feeling I would have scrap 
everything and install the latest OS.

If I go get the latest tarball, will that have the dependancy issue I 
ran into with the rpm file?

- Original Message -
From: Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:52 am
Subject: Re: mutt crashes -- 1.2.5 -> 1.4

> * MindFuq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 07:27]:
> > I've started using Sven Guckes configuration files, and mutt seems
> > to crash much more frequently (enough to make it unusable). [..]
> > It looks like I'll have to dump his config files..
> 
> well, i have been using mutt 1.4 for quite a while -
> but none of my setup has made mutt crash in years.
> 
> if you expect my full setup to work with your
> personal stuff, well, you better think again.
> after all my setup sources about a dozen files
> which might not exist in your environment and
> uses lots of things you might not need at all.
> 
> > Could these crashes be the result of using config
> > files not made for my version (1.2.5i)? [..]
> > It crashed occasionally when I had no config files at all, but I
> > could usually at least accomplish something before the crash.
> 
> well, if it's not the setup then it probably
> is the version itself, right?  so - upgrade!
> 
> otherwise you are just missing some 22 months
> of development and tread on old bugs.  besides,
> you are not wasting your own time but ours, too.
> 
> Sven
> 
> -- 
> Sven Guckes[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> http://guckes/net/mutt/mutt-1.2.5  [2000-07-29] 
> http://www.mutt.org Admins - please upgrade
> mutt-1.4[2002-05-29]  ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/   the user 
> version to 1.4!
> mutt-1.5.1  [2002-05-02]  ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/devel  
> news:comp.mail.mutt




Re: $mail_check and $timeout

2002-09-20 Thread Sven Guckes

* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 11:33]:
> Could some friendly soul describe the differens
> between these two settings ($mail_check and $timeout)?

the timeout counts down after your last key press.
mail_check works continuously.

> I've read the manual but I still don't quite understand.
> Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a reason
> why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent?

yes.  think.  homework.  rtfm 4.11 "IMAP Support".

Sven



Re: mutt crashes -- 1.2.5 -> 1.4

2002-09-20 Thread Sven Guckes

* MindFuq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 07:27]:
> I've started using Sven Guckes configuration files, and mutt seems
> to crash much more frequently (enough to make it unusable). [..]
> It looks like I'll have to dump his config files..

well, i have been using mutt 1.4 for quite a while -
but none of my setup has made mutt crash in years.

if you expect my full setup to work with your
personal stuff, well, you better think again.
after all my setup sources about a dozen files
which might not exist in your environment and
uses lots of things you might not need at all.

> Could these crashes be the result of using config
> files not made for my version (1.2.5i)? [..]
> It crashed occasionally when I had no config files at all, but I
> could usually at least accomplish something before the crash.

well, if it's not the setup then it probably
is the version itself, right?  so - upgrade!

otherwise you are just missing some 22 months
of development and tread on old bugs.  besides,
you are not wasting your own time but ours, too.

Sven

-- 
Sven Guckes[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://guckes/net/mutt/
mutt-1.2.5  [2000-07-29] http://www.mutt.org Admins - please upgrade
mutt-1.4[2002-05-29]  ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/   the user version to 1.4!
mutt-1.5.1  [2002-05-02]  ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/devel  news:comp.mail.mutt



Re: [OT] Forcing correct quotes

2002-09-20 Thread Sven Guckes

* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020920 02:07]:
> ">_" is the de-facto standard.  period.
> making this an option was a bad idea.

* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 09:18]:
> Note the space after the > (i.e. >_) which makes things a lot
> easier to read than just > (which I also consider broken)

amen!

> > Sven  [using sed as the display_filter
> >to correct incorrect quoting]
> Care to share?

guckes.net/setup - as usual.

Sven



Re: S/MIME interoperability

2002-09-20 Thread Alex Pleiner

You are right. If you look at smime.c you will see that Mutt desperatly
needs either smime-type or (to satisfy Netscape 4.x mailers) a
Content-Description.

As s/mime is in development, we all have to wait or find some
workarounds for it. See my mail from 18-09-02 for my current solution.

I'm sure we have to discuss this further in private or join the mutt-dev
list.

BTW: the right way of figuring out if we have an "enveloped-data" or
"signed-data" would be to look into the data itself (I was told). You
can do this by:

openssl smime -pk7out -in mail.msg | openssl asn1parse -dump

Timo T. Rajala [2002-09-20 14:18]:
> * Timo T. Rajala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One difference is that the "smime-type=enveloped-data;" row is missing
> > from the MS mail. I inserted this row in the MS mail and opened the
> > mail in mutt: now both signature check and decrypt works.
> > 
> > My question is: Is the MS MUA not following the S/MIME standard by
> > omitting this row or is mutt wrong by not being able to handle it
> > without this row?
>
> So this MS MUA SHOULD include "smime-type", but is not and mutt should
> be able to determine the MIME type from the file extension but is not.

-- 
Alex Pleiner
zeitform Internet Dienste Fraunhoferstrasse 5
  64283 Darmstadt, Germany
http://www.zeitform.deTel.: +49 (0)6151 155-635
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Fax:  +49 (0)6151 155-634
GnuPG/PGP Key-ID: 0x613C21EA




Re: Weird bug/feature ?

2002-09-20 Thread Bruno Lustosa

Cedric Duval [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> 'a' attaches a file, not a message (of course, the message can be in one
> file like with the mbox format - but not with maildir).
> 
> There is a more appropriate function for what you want to do:
>  ('A').

Right, I didn't know about the attach-message command. Just thought that
as the message was in a file, I could go and select it as any other
file, but I guess when I select the maildir, mutt recognizes it as such
instead of seeing it as just a directory.
Many thanks!!

-- 
Bruno Lustosa, aka Lofofora  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator/Web Programmer | ICQ UIN: 1406477
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil  |



msg31080/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


$mail_check and $timeout

2002-09-20 Thread Johan Svedberg

Hi, all.

Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two
settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still
don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a
reason why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent?

Regards, Johan Svedberg




$mail_check and $timeout

2002-09-20 Thread Johan Svedberg

Hi, all.

Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two
settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still
don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a
reason why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent?

Regards, Johan Svedberg



Re: S/MIME interoperability

2002-09-20 Thread Timo T. Rajala

* Timo T. Rajala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One difference is that the "smime-type=enveloped-data;" row is missing
> from the MS mail. I inserted this row in the MS mail and opened the
> mail in mutt: now both signature check and decrypt works.
> 
> My question is: Is the MS MUA not following the S/MIME standard by
> omitting this row or is mutt wrong by not being able to handle it
> without this row?

I'm quoting from RFC2633:

3.2:
...
Because there are several types of application/pkcs7-mime objects, a
   sending agent SHOULD do as much as possible to help a receiving
agent
   know about the contents of the object without forcing the receiving
   agent to decode the ASN.1 for the object. The MIME headers of all
   application/pkcs7-mime objects SHOULD include the optional "smime-
   type" parameter, as described in the following sections.

3.2.1:
For the application/pkcs7-mime, sending agents SHOULD emit the
optional "name" parameter to the Content-Type field for compatibility
   with older systems. Sending agents SHOULD also emit the optional
   Content-Disposition field [CONTDISP] with the "filename" parameter.
   If a sending agent emits the above parameters, the value of the
   parameters SHOULD be a file name with the appropriate extension:

   MIME TypeFile Extension

   Application/pkcs7-mime (signedData,  .p7m
   envelopedData)

   Application/pkcs7-mime (degenerate   .p7c
   signedData "certs-only" message)

   Application/pkcs7-signature  .p7s


So this MS MUA SHOULD include "smime-type", but is not and mutt should
be able to determine the MIME type from the file extension but is not.

-- 
Timo T. Rajala



Re: at last message

2002-09-20 Thread Ricardo SIGNES

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:20:18AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Ricardo SIGNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 20:46 -0400]:
> [...]
> > I can't find a way to force  not to move, nor can I find a way
> > to get "back to where I was," taking into account the move that may result
> > from .
> > 
> > Is there a solution other than hacking the source?
> 
> Yes.
> From the fine manual:
> | 6.3.208  resolve

Man!  I searched, with no joy.  I'll put some $resolve toggling in there.
Thanks.

-- 
rjbs



msg31076/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


S/MIME interoperability

2002-09-20 Thread Timo T. Rajala

I am currently using mutt 1.5.1 and the S/MIME functions have proved to
work without problems. But today I received an encrypted and signed
S/MIME message which could not be neither verified nor decrypted by mutt
(openssl). Here are the significant headers from two different mails,
the first mail is created by Lotus Notes R5 and the second is created
by some Microsoft MUA (don't know which, no MUA header). Both are
signed and encrypted. The Notes mail works, the MS mail doesn't:

Lotus Notes:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime;
 smime-type=enveloped-data;
 name=smime.p7m
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7m"
Content-Description: S/MIME Enveloped Data

Microsoft unknown MUA:
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime;
name="smime.p7m"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="smime.p7m"

One difference is that the "smime-type=enveloped-data;" row is missing
from the MS mail. I inserted this row in the MS mail and opened the
mail in mutt: now both signature check and decrypt works.

My question is: Is the MS MUA not following the S/MIME standard by
omitting this row or is mutt wrong by not being able to handle it
without this row?

Any comments?
 
-- 
Timo T. Rajala



[OT] Forcing correct quotes (was: Correct way to quote?)

2002-09-20 Thread Johan Almqvist

* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020920 02:07]:
> ">_" is the de-facto standard.  period.
> making this an option was a bad idea.

Note the space after the >  (i e >_) which makes things a lot easyier to
read than just > (which I also consider broken)

> Sven  [using sed as the display_filter
>to correct incorrect quoting]

Care to share?

-Johan
-- 
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/



Re: at last message

2002-09-20 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky

* Ricardo SIGNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 20:46 -0400]:
[...]
> I can't find a way to force  not to move, nor can I find a way to
> get "back to where I was," taking into account the move that may result from
> .
> 
> Is there a solution other than hacking the source?

Yes.
>From the fine manual:
| 6.3.208  resolve
| 
| Type: boolean
| 
| Default: yes
| 
| When set, the cursor will be automatically advanced to the next
| (possibly undeleted) message whenever a command that modifies the
| current message is executed.

Nicolas



mutt crashes

2002-09-20 Thread MindFuq

I've started using Sven Gluckes configuration files, and mutt seems to 
crash much more frequently (enough to make it unusable).  I get:

---
Detected an attempt to write across stack boundry
Terminating /usr/bin/mutt
"libsafe violation for /usr/bin/mutt, pid=1981; overflow caused by 
memcopy()"
Null message body; hope that's ok
---

It looks like I'll have to dump his config files.. which will be a 
bummer because I already customized them.  I noticed some people run 
different config files for different versions.  Could these crashes be 
the result of using config files not made for my version (1.2.5i)?  
Does anyone recommend a config file for this version?

It crashed occasionally when I had no config files at all, but I could 
usually at least accomplish something before the crash.  With Sven's 
scripts, I can't even page down in the first message I open w/out a 
crash.