Protocol mismatch, Server Version = 9 Client Version =
Hello I have a C app that uses libmysql.dll provided with MySQL 4.1.0-max-nt distribution. I am trying to connect to a remote server running MySQL 3.23.47 and I get the error - Error No. 2007 Protocol mismatch, Server Version = 9 Client Version = 10 whenever I try to connect using mysql_real_connect(). What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance. Karam __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error No. 2007 Protocol mismatch, Server Version = 9 Client Version = 10
Hello I have a C app that uses libmysql.dll provided with MySQL 4.1.0-max-nt distribution. I am trying to connect to a remote server running MySQL 3.23.47 and I get the error - Error No. 2007 Protocol mismatch, Server Version = 9 Client Version = 10 whenever I try to connect using mysql_real_connect(). What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance. Karam __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fulltext Index and Unicode (MySQL 4.1)
Hi! On Sep 06, Andreas Schwarz wrote: > Egor Egorov wrote: > > Andreas Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> is it possible to use Fulltext indexes on unicode (UTF-8 or UCS-2) > >> fields in 4.1? > >> > > > > Nope. Fulltext search doesn't work with multi-byte character sets. > > Will this be fixed in future versions? Otherwise I would have to > do the indexing manually. Yes, it will. Regards, Sergei -- __ ___ ___ __ / |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Sergei Golubchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL AB, Senior Software Developer /_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ Osnabrueck, Germany <___/ www.mysql.com -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with the "IN" operator
At 11:25 -0400 9/6/03, Roger Davis wrote: I am having a bit of trouble with the "IN" operator. I am thinking that it just may be my misunderstanding. Situation. I have a table (ZipCounty) that I want to pull vendors from based on zipcode. So I have a Vendor like field declared as TEXT. To keep the table up to date, I issuse updates in the manor of... UPDATE ZipCounty SET VendorLink = IF(VendorLink IS NULL,'528',CONCAT(VendorLink,',528')) WHERE State = 'CA' AND 528 NOT IN (VendorLink); IN() takes a list of values to look for. It does not take a value that itself consists of a list of values. In your statement above, the IN expression will be true only if the value of VendorLink is exactly 528. Where 528 would be the ID of that particular vendor. These updates work fine, but later if I need to do another update, say to remove 528 from the VendorLink field, I can find all of the the records where 528 is the only number in the field, or if it is the first number in the field, but not if it is the last number in the field. This sounds like you don't want VendorLink values that begin with 528 followed by either the end of the value or a comma. You might try a REGEXP pattern match such as this: NOT (VendorLink REGEXP '^528($|,)') Here's how the pattern works with some sample values: ++-+ | VendorLink | NOT (VendorLink REGEXP '^528($|,)') | ++-+ | 528| 0 | | 5289 | 1 | | 528,1 | 0 | | 5289,1 | 1 | | 1,528 | 1 | | 1,5289 | 1 | ++-+ Note that REGEXP will return NULL if VendorLink is NULL. Hope someone can help me out. Roger Here are a few selects mysql> SELECT Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE VendorLink = '529,528'; +---+ | Count(ID) | +---+ | 1384 | +---+ 1 row in set (0.25 sec) mysql> SELECT Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE '528' IN (VendorLink); +---+ | Count(ID) | +---+ | 0 | +---+ 1 row in set (0.25 sec) mysql> SELECT VendorLink, Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE VendorLink IS NOT NULL GROUP BY VendorLink; ++---+ | VendorLink | Count(ID) | ++---+ | 529| 3844 | | 529,528| 1384 | ++---+ 2 rows in set (0.61 sec) Why do I get a count of 0 for the Second Query? Here is a list of all the queries and output. (redhat 9.0 version 2.23.54) This also happens on the latest Windows version (mysql Ver 12.21 Distrib 4.0.14, for Win95/Win98 (i32)) mysql> \s -- mysql Ver 11.18 Distrib 3.23.54, for redhat-linux-gnu (i386) Connection id: 59756 Current database: TPZ Current user: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current pager: stdout Using outfile: '' Server version: 3.23.54 Protocol version: 10 Connection: Localhost via UNIX socket Client characterset:latin1 Server characterset:latin1 UNIX socket:/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock Uptime: 12 days 19 hours 38 min 36 sec Threads: 2 Questions: 2354432 Slow queries: 43 Opens: 143 Flush tables: 1 Open tables: 64 Queries per second avg: 2.126 -- mysql> SHOW CREATE TABLE ZipCounty; +---+--- + | Table | Create Table | +---+--- + | ZipCounty | CREATE TABLE `ZipCounty` ( `ID` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `City` varchar(50) default NULL, `State` char(2) default NULL, `Zip` varchar(10) default NULL, `AreaCode` char(3) default NULL, `County` varchar(50) default NULL, `VendorLink` text, `OtherLink` text, PRIMARY KEY (`ID`), KEY `Zip` (`Zip`), KEY `County` (`County`), KEY `State` (`State`) ) TYPE=MyISAM | +---+--- ---
Re: Help with the "IN" operator
You are misunderstanding the 'IN' operator Try and think of it this way SELECT value from table where field in (1,2,3) is the same as SELECT value from table where field = 1 or field = 2 or field = 3 So in you case SELECT Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE '528' IN (VendorLink); is SELECT Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE '528' = (VendorLink); In your case I would try using the 'LIKE' operator SELECT Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE (VendorLink) like '%528%'; -Michael "Don't shed tears for those already in the ground, until after you have brought vengeance to those who put them there. There will be time enough then." -Kahlan On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Roger Davis wrote: > I am having a bit of trouble with the "IN" operator. I am thinking that it > just may be my misunderstanding. > > Situation. > I have a table (ZipCounty) that I want to pull vendors from based on > zipcode. So I have a Vendor like field declared as TEXT. To keep the table > up to date, I issuse updates in the manor of... > > UPDATE ZipCounty SET VendorLink = IF(VendorLink IS > NULL,'528',CONCAT(VendorLink,',528')) WHERE State = 'CA' AND 528 NOT IN > (VendorLink); > > Where 528 would be the ID of that particular vendor. These updates work > fine, but later if I need to do another update, say to remove 528 from the > VendorLink field, I can find all of the the records where 528 is the only > number in the field, or if it is the first number in the field, but not if > it is the last number in the field. > > Hope someone can help me out. > > Roger > > Here are a few selects > > mysql> SELECT Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE VendorLink = '529,528'; > +---+ > | Count(ID) | > +---+ > | 1384 | > +---+ > 1 row in set (0.25 sec) > > mysql> SELECT Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE '528' IN (VendorLink); > +---+ > | Count(ID) | > +---+ > | 0 | > +---+ > 1 row in set (0.25 sec) > > mysql> SELECT VendorLink, Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE VendorLink IS NOT > NULL GROUP BY VendorLink; > ++---+ > | VendorLink | Count(ID) | > ++---+ > | 529| 3844 | > | 529,528| 1384 | > ++---+ > 2 rows in set (0.61 sec) > > Why do I get a count of 0 for the Second Query? > > > Here is a list of all the queries and output. (redhat 9.0 version 2.23.54) > > This also happens on the latest Windows version (mysql Ver 12.21 Distrib > 4.0.14, for Win95/Win98 (i32)) > > > mysql> \s > -- > mysql Ver 11.18 Distrib 3.23.54, for redhat-linux-gnu (i386) > > Connection id: 59756 > Current database: TPZ > Current user: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Current pager: stdout > Using outfile: '' > Server version: 3.23.54 > Protocol version: 10 > Connection: Localhost via UNIX socket > Client characterset:latin1 > Server characterset:latin1 > UNIX socket:/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock > Uptime: 12 days 19 hours 38 min 36 sec > > Threads: 2 Questions: 2354432 Slow queries: 43 Opens: 143 Flush tables: > 1 Open tables: 64 Queries per second avg: 2.126 > -- > > mysql> SHOW CREATE TABLE ZipCounty; > +---+--- > > > > > + > | Table | Create Table > | > +---+--- > > > > > + > | ZipCounty | CREATE TABLE `ZipCounty` ( > `ID` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, > `City` varchar(50) default NULL, > `State` char(2) default NULL, > `Zip` varchar(10) default NULL, > `AreaCode` char(3) default NULL, > `County` varchar(50) default NULL, > `VendorLink` text, > `OtherLink` text, > PRIMARY KEY (`ID`), > KEY `Zip` (`Zip`), > KEY `County` (`County`), > KEY `State` (`State`) > ) TYPE=MyISAM | > +---+--- > > > > > + > 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > > mysql>
Re: Fulltext Index and Unicode (MySQL 4.1)
At 11:25 + 9/6/03, Andreas Schwarz wrote: Egor Egorov wrote: Andreas Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: is it possible to use Fulltext indexes on unicode (UTF-8 or UCS-2) fields in 4.1? Nope. Fulltext search doesn't work with multi-byte character sets. That's correct. It's documented at: http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Fulltext_Restrictions.html Will this be fixed in future versions? Otherwise I would have to do the indexing manually. It'd be a nice enhancement. But as far as I know, it'll likely not happen unless someone sponsors development, which has not happened. -- AVR-Tutorial, über 350 Links Forum für AVRGCC und MSPGCC -> http://www.mikrocontroller.net -- Paul DuBois, Senior Technical Writer Madison, Wisconsin, USA MySQL AB, www.mysql.com Are you MySQL certified? http://www.mysql.com/certification/ -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Regular Expression Reference
At 11:08 -0400 9/6/03, Jeff Brewer wrote: I'm sure this is sitting inches from my nose but I just can't see it. In Appendix G of the manual it states: "This is a simplistic reference that skips the details. To get more exact information, see Henry Spencer's regex(7) manual page that is included in the source distribution." I can't seem to find "Henry Spencer's regex(7) manual page" anywhere. I've fun searches on my "mysql" directory and searched the mysql website. I'm really interested in just getting a complete referece to the subject. Can I use the full suite of expressions available in Java, e.g.? Thanks in advance, Jeff Go to google.com and search for "Henry Spencer regex". It'll turn up a bunch of links, one of which is: http://arglist.com/regex/ This site contains a distribution that includes the man pages. -- Paul DuBois, Senior Technical Writer Madison, Wisconsin, USA MySQL AB, www.mysql.com Are you MySQL certified? http://www.mysql.com/certification/ -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with the "IN" operator
I am having a bit of trouble with the "IN" operator. I am thinking that it just may be my misunderstanding. Situation. I have a table (ZipCounty) that I want to pull vendors from based on zipcode. So I have a Vendor like field declared as TEXT. To keep the table up to date, I issuse updates in the manor of... UPDATE ZipCounty SET VendorLink = IF(VendorLink IS NULL,'528',CONCAT(VendorLink,',528')) WHERE State = 'CA' AND 528 NOT IN (VendorLink); Where 528 would be the ID of that particular vendor. These updates work fine, but later if I need to do another update, say to remove 528 from the VendorLink field, I can find all of the the records where 528 is the only number in the field, or if it is the first number in the field, but not if it is the last number in the field. Hope someone can help me out. Roger Here are a few selects mysql> SELECT Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE VendorLink = '529,528'; +---+ | Count(ID) | +---+ | 1384 | +---+ 1 row in set (0.25 sec) mysql> SELECT Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE '528' IN (VendorLink); +---+ | Count(ID) | +---+ | 0 | +---+ 1 row in set (0.25 sec) mysql> SELECT VendorLink, Count(ID) FROM ZipCounty WHERE VendorLink IS NOT NULL GROUP BY VendorLink; ++---+ | VendorLink | Count(ID) | ++---+ | 529| 3844 | | 529,528| 1384 | ++---+ 2 rows in set (0.61 sec) Why do I get a count of 0 for the Second Query? Here is a list of all the queries and output. (redhat 9.0 version 2.23.54) This also happens on the latest Windows version (mysql Ver 12.21 Distrib 4.0.14, for Win95/Win98 (i32)) mysql> \s -- mysql Ver 11.18 Distrib 3.23.54, for redhat-linux-gnu (i386) Connection id: 59756 Current database: TPZ Current user: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current pager: stdout Using outfile: '' Server version: 3.23.54 Protocol version: 10 Connection: Localhost via UNIX socket Client characterset:latin1 Server characterset:latin1 UNIX socket:/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock Uptime: 12 days 19 hours 38 min 36 sec Threads: 2 Questions: 2354432 Slow queries: 43 Opens: 143 Flush tables: 1 Open tables: 64 Queries per second avg: 2.126 -- mysql> SHOW CREATE TABLE ZipCounty; +---+--- + | Table | Create Table | +---+--- + | ZipCounty | CREATE TABLE `ZipCounty` ( `ID` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `City` varchar(50) default NULL, `State` char(2) default NULL, `Zip` varchar(10) default NULL, `AreaCode` char(3) default NULL, `County` varchar(50) default NULL, `VendorLink` text, `OtherLink` text, PRIMARY KEY (`ID`), KEY `Zip` (`Zip`), KEY `County` (`County`), KEY `State` (`State`) ) TYPE=MyISAM | +---+--- + 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> UPDATE ZipCounty SET VendorLink = NULL; Query OK, 11193 rows affected (0.99 sec) Rows matched: 69802 Changed: 11193 Warnings: 0 mysql> UPDATE ZipCounty SET VendorLink = IF(VendorLink IS NULL,'529',CONCAT(VendorLink,',529')) WHERE State = 'AL' AND 529 NOT IN (VendorLink); Query OK, 1312 rows affected (0.08 sec) Rows matched: 1312 Changed: 1312 Warnings: 0 mysql> UPDATE ZipCounty SET VendorLink = IF(VendorLink IS NULL,'529',CONCAT(VendorLink,',529')) WHERE State = 'AR' AND 529 NOT IN (VendorLink); Query OK, 1313 rows affected (0.07 sec) Rows matched: 1313 Changed: 1313 Warnings: 0 mysql> UPDATE ZipCounty SET VendorLink = IF(VendorLink IS NULL,'529',CONCAT(VendorLink,',529')) WHERE County = 'Kent' AND State = 'DE' AND 529 NOT IN (VendorLink); Query OK, 30 rows affected (0.00 sec) Rows matched: 30 Changed: 30 Warnings: 0 mysql> UPDATE ZipCounty SET VendorLink = IF(Vendor
Regular Expression Reference
I'm sure this is sitting inches from my nose but I just can't see it. In Appendix G of the manual it states: "This is a simplistic reference that skips the details. To get more exact information, see Henry Spencer's regex(7) manual page that is included in the source distribution." I can't seem to find "Henry Spencer's regex(7) manual page" anywhere. I've fun searches on my "mysql" directory and searched the mysql website. I'm really interested in just getting a complete referece to the subject. Can I use the full suite of expressions available in Java, e.g.? Thanks in advance, Jeff
MySQL on Windows 2000
Hi, We have installed PHP/MySQL on a Windows 2000 server. PHP & MySQL are working fine on the server. We also require to connect ASP to MySQL database. How can we do that? Currently the MySQL/ODBC driver is not available on Windows 2000 server. How can we add that and proceed with ASP/MySQL? Sheni R Meledath [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sobig.F on this list
I got a bounced email with an attachment entitled macex.mex.scr, about 72.3 KB, which if IIRC is probably the Sobig.F virus. It appears to have been sent to people on this list (even though the list wasn't in the "to:" line) because the body of the email discussed MySQL. Since Sobig.F forges the "from" line, I don't think the person it was "from" sent it. Rather, IIRC the virus doesn't spoof the IP address that the incoming connection came from, and it appears to be: 217.204.219.154 nslookup says this belongs to mobiletones1-2.dsl.easynet.co.uk That belong to anybody here? If so, and *if* I'm right about the virus (well, worm actually), you might be infected... sjfromm -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fulltext Index and Unicode (MySQL 4.1)
Egor Egorov wrote: > Andreas Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> is it possible to use Fulltext indexes on unicode (UTF-8 or UCS-2) >> fields in 4.1? >> > > Nope. Fulltext search doesn't work with multi-byte character sets. Will this be fixed in future versions? Otherwise I would have to do the indexing manually. -- AVR-Tutorial, über 350 Links Forum für AVRGCC und MSPGCC -> http://www.mikrocontroller.net -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
group_concat()
I finally installed 4.1 alpha so I could test the group_concat function but need some help... could anyone give me a clue how I can order the results of group_concat() according to the lft field ? (just adding it per se wipes out the results) I have tried many many variations and have not hit upong the right combo yet.. would a user variable help ? Any clues welcome. select group_concat(p.nam order by p.nam desc SEPARATOR "/") as name, c.lft, c.rgt, c.nam from myTree p, myTree c where c.lft between p.lft and p.rgt group by p.nam; +-+-+-+--+ | name| lft | rgt | nam | +-+-+-+--+ | Root/anewfolder | 12 | 23 | anewfolder | | Root/images/branch.gif/anewfolder | 16 | 17 | branch.gif | | Root/images/branchbottom.gif/anewfolder | 18 | 19 | branchbottom.gif | | Root/images/branchtop.gif/anewfolder| 20 | 21 | branchtop.gif| | Root/cattest.sql| 6 | 7 | cattest.sql | | Root/example.php| 8 | 9 | example.php | | Root/images/anewfolder | 15 | 22 | images | | Root/index.php | 10 | 11 | index.php| | Root/newobj/anewfolder | 13 | 14 | newobj | | Root/old| 24 | 27 | old | | Root/oldindex.php/old | 25 | 26 | oldindex.php | | Root| 1 | 28 | Root | | Tree.php/Root | 2 | 3 | Tree.php | | TreeMenu.php/Root | 4 | 5 | TreeMenu.php | +-+-+-+--+ If I add "order by c.lft" everything is ideal except the group_concat() output is gone. +--+-+-+--+ | name | lft | rgt | nam | +--+-+-+--+ | | 1 | 28 | Root | | | 2 | 3 | Tree.php | | | 4 | 5 | TreeMenu.php | | | 6 | 7 | cattest.sql | | | 8 | 9 | example.php | | | 10 | 11 | index.php| | | 12 | 23 | anewfolder | | | 13 | 14 | newobj | | | 15 | 22 | images | | | 16 | 17 | branch.gif | | | 18 | 19 | branchbottom.gif | | | 20 | 21 | branchtop.gif| | | 24 | 27 | old | | | 25 | 26 | oldindex.php | +--+-+-+--+ --markc -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Query hung up in "Copying to tmp table"
Kevin, Forgot to mention that I think you're not seeing any temporary files because they're hidden. From http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Temporary_files.html "MySQL creates all temporary files as hidden files. This ensures that the temporary files will be removed if mysqld is terminated. The disadvantage of using hidden files is that you will not see a big temporary file that fills up the filesystem in which the temporary file directory is located." But then it also says: "For some SELECT queries, MySQL also creates temporary SQL tables. These are not hidden and have names of the form `SQL_*'." So I dunno. :-) But I'm thinking they ARE hidden... if there's any files at all. It may be just an in memory temp HEAP table if it's smaller than tmp_table_size and no TEXT/BLOB columns are used in the query (e.g. possible length > 255). I don't think there's much tuning that can be done to the server. The query and/or tables may need to be changed, if possible, to examine/return less rows. Also, what's the EXPLAIN SELECT output look like for the queries (the original and modified)? Just change the names of the tables/columns if you can't let them be seen. :-) Hint: use \G instead of ; at the end of the EXPLAIN query to make the output more legible. Matt - Original Message - From: "Kevin Fries" Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:09 AM Subject: RE: Query hung up in "Copying to tmp table" > Matt, > > Thanks for your response. It's going to take a bit for me to get the > actual SQL available. I don't yet have permission to show that off. In > the mean time, I can tell you that there are 10 table in the query, with > 4 being references to the same table. I've been able to make an > improvement that greatly improves the speed... by over-joining some > records. That is, I'm joining 3 tables such that A joins to B, B joins > to C, and C joins to A, basically. That was enough to let mySQL sort > out a better plan. > > Interestingly though, the result of the query (and it appears to be > proper) is 0 rows. I believe it's the intermediate row set that may be > huge. But I've never seen mysql spit out a temporary file while > processing. > > Again, I'd really like someone's reference to a tuning guide, if there's > a superior one available. > > Thanks again, > Kevin > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt W > > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:37 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Query hung up in "Copying to tmp table" > > > > > > Hi Kevin, > > > > I imagine the query is examining/returning so many rows that > > it's going to take a long time to create the needed temporary > > table (how long have you it go?). To start with, show us the > > EXPLAIN output for the problem SELECT, along with the SELECT. > > Also the size of the involved tables (rows and MB). > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kevin Fries" > > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 6:51 PM > > Subject: Query hung up in "Copying to tmp table" > > > > > > > I'm having a problem where a complex SELECT query begins eating up > > lots > > > of CPU and never returns. In "show processlist", it > > > reports "Copying to tmp table". Other queries seem to get locked > > > waiting for this query, as well. > > > > > > This is on version 3.23.36 of mySQL, and I'm considering > > upgrading to > > > the latest 3.23.57, to see if that improves the > > performance. I can't > > > find any matching references in the Changes web pages that indicate > > > this, though. Can anyone verify this? > > > > > > Alternately, I'm trying to find ways to possibly improve the step of > > > "copying to tmp table". According to my "show variables" > > output, the > > > "tmpdir" is /tmp, and /tmp has plenty of room (85 megs or so). But > > > while the query is running, I don't even see a corresponding file > > there. > > > The CPU is spiking with top reporting mysql as eating 85% > > CPU. So I > > > then assume that the 'problem' is happening before the file is > > created? > > > Does that sound right? > > > > > > If someone has a better reference for tracking down the source of a > > > problem like this, other than > > > http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/MySQL_Optimisation.html, I'd be very > > > appreciative. > > > > > > thanks, > > > Kevin Fries -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
