RE: Need help with a SELECT statement across 3 tables

2004-02-04 Thread Brandon Ewing
Dominique:

Thanks for your suggestions/ideas.  After playing with it for a little while
longer of banging my head into a brick wall, I realized I was using a left
join when I needed a right.  You have my table structures pretty much down -
here's the final SQL statement that I use to return 1 row per update per
server that hasn't been applied:

SELECT update_track.update_id, server.server_id, server.os,
update_track.bugtraq_id 
 FROM update_track 
 LEFT JOIN server_update ON (update_track.update_id =
server_update.update_id) 
 RIGHT JOIN server ON (server_update.server_id = server.server_id) 
 WHERE server.os = update_track.os AND server_update.server_id IS NULL;

Which returns something easy to work with ( from a test set of 2 entries in
the update_track table)

+---+---+--++
| update_id | server_id | os   | bugtraq_id |
+---+---+--++
| 5 | 5 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 | 7 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 | 8 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |13 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |16 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |19 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |20 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |27 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |28 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |30 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |31 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |32 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |39 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |40 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |44 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |49 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |51 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 4 |53 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 5 |56 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   104 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   123 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 4 |   532 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 5 |   165 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 4 |   295 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 5 |   327 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   361 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   364 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   388 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   403 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   405 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   406 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   407 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   408 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   424 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   430 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   455 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   457 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 4 |   467 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 4 |   529 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 4 |   512 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 5 |   533 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 5 |   554 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
| 4 |   556 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 4 |   558 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 4 |   565 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 4 |   575 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 4 |   601 | RedHat 9 |  0 |
| 5 |   614 | Windows 2000 |  0 |
+---+---+--++

I think I should be able to claim SQL as a second language - you can say so
much with it!

Brandon Ewing

-Original Message-
From: Dominique Plante [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 4:43 PM
To: 'Brandon Ewing'
Subject: RE: Need help with a SELECT statement across 3 tables

Brandon:

I have been toying with your problem, and unfortunately, I have yet to come
up with a good solution, since I am interested in seeing what the solution
would be.

Maybe you can confirm a few things.  Do your table structures look anything
like this?

Server:
| Field | Type| Null | Key | Default | Extra  |
+---+-+--+-+-++
| server_id | int(11) |  | PRI | NULL| auto_increment |
| location  | varchar(30) | YES  | | NULL||
| os| varchar(30) | YES  | | NULL||

Server_update:
| Field  | Type  | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
++---+--+-+-+---+
| server_id  | int(11)   |  | | 0   |   |
| update_id  | int(11)   |  | | 0   |   |
| updateDateTime | timestamp | YES  | | NULL|   |

Update_track:
| Field   | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra  |
+-+--+--+-+-+-

Need help with a SELECT statement across 3 tables

2004-01-23 Thread Brandon Ewing
Isn't it great when you've got this pretty picture in your head about what
you want SQL to do for you, but aren't sure how to write it down?

I've got 3 tables, they are:

server  -  a table that tracks all of our servers, including os, where they
are, access details, etc
update_track - a table that tracks updates that need to be applied to
servers.  
server_update - a table that tracks what updates have been applied to what
servers.


An update_track entry contains a update_id, the primary key, a description,
the afflicted OS, and the bugtraq ID associated with the update.  So there's
multiple entries for each bugtraq id for the OS's we support.

The server_update table contains update_id, server_id, and a datestamp for
when the update was applied.

What I want to do is be able to list all servers that do not have all
updates applied, based on OS.  So we have to take each update_id, compare
the update OS against a server entry OS, and decide if it matches, then
check the server_update table to see if the update is applied already.  I
imagine that it would be sorted by server_id, then update_id.

Has anyone done anything similar before, and can help me out?

TIA
Brandon Ewing


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]