Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency

2002-07-22 Thread G. Scott Granados


Nah, that's not loaded.  Its not loaded until you make it go in to alarm by
passing traffic:):).


- Original Message -
From: "Phil Rosenthal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Alex Rubenstein'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:05 PM
Subject: RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency


>
> 40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3?
>
> --Phil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Alex Rubenstein
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:27 PM
> To: Derek Samford
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency
>
>
>
>
> Yes, it's horrid. I've been peering with PSI for going on three years,
> and it's never been as bad as it is now.
>
> oddly enough, we see 30+ msec across a DS3 to them, which isn't that
> loaded (35 to 40 mb/s).
>
> Then, behind whatever we peer with, we see over 400 msec, with 50% loss,
> during business hours.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Derek Samford wrote:
>
> >
> > There was some mail being tossed around earlier about Cogent
> having
> > latency. I'm actually seeing this on PSINet (Now owned by
> > Cogent.) Is anyone else still seeing the latency they were
> > experiencing earlier?
> >
> > Derek
> >
>
> -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
> --Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --
>
>
>




msfc v msfc2

2002-07-17 Thread G. Scott Granados


Sorry for being a bit ot:).  In short whats the difference between the Cisco
msfc2 and msfc?  I know the msfc2 is newer but what makes it better?  A url
compairing the two would be fine also.

Thanks

Scott




Re: AS4006

2002-07-15 Thread G. Scott Granados


Hi, actually netrail is Cogent now.

I think its like 18774cogent or something like that you can find their
number on their front page at
http://www.cogentco.com.

There noc has always been very responsive and helpful to me actually really
above average so they should be able to help.

Scott

- Original Message -
From: "Don Wilder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andre Chapuis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 5:37 PM
Subject: RE: AS4006


>
> Andre,
>
> Using ARIN's Whois service I obtained the following:
> as4006
> OrgName: NetRail, Inc.
> OrgID: RAIL
>
> ASNumber: 4006 - 4006
> ASName: NETRAIL
> ASHandle: AS4006
> Comment:
> RegDate: 1994-11-10 12:00:00
> Updated:
>
> TechHandle: NRAIL-NOC-ARIN
> TechName: NetRail, Inc.,
> TechPhone: +1-404-522-5400
> TechEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Looking at the age of this AS number, it may not be totally current, but
> hope this helps.
>
> Don Wilder
> Senior Systems Administrator
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Andre Chapuis
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:34 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: AS4006
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > Anybody has a contact for AS4006 ? (peering issue)
> > Thanks
> > André
> >
> >
> > -
> > Andre Chapuis
> > IP+ Engineering
> > Swisscom Ltd
> > Genfergasse 14
> > 3050 Bern
> > +41 31 893 89 61
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > CCIE #6023
> > --
>




Re: CA Power

2002-07-11 Thread G. Scott Granados


Its all the same!

Just remember.

Be sure to pillage before you burn!

- Original Message -
From: "Jacob M Wilkens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:41 PM
Subject: RE: CA Power


>
> When it's high-tech /rioting/ it's then called sabotage right?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Joseph Barnhart
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:35 PM
> To: G. Scott Granados
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CA Power
>
>
>
> Hrmm...hi-tech rioters...interesting idea :)
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, G. Scott Granados wrote:
>
> > As long as they leave the fiber alone:).
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Joseph Barnhart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:31 PM
> > Subject: RE: CA Power
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Funny thing about rioters is they usually
> > > destroy their own neighborhoods...go figure.
> > >
> > > --jb
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Doug Barton:
> > > > [deletia]
> > > > Reporter: So, how many generators do you have at this plant?
> > > > Operator: 3
> > > > R: How many do you have operating today?
> > > > O: Just one.
> > > > R: REALLY? But we had rolling blackouts all through San Diego County
> > > > today, why aren't you operating all 3 generators?
> > > > O: Because Cal-ISO told me to turn off #2, and not to turn #3
> > > > on at all.
> > > > [deletia]
> > > > Doug
> > >
> > > Let's assume this is true (not arguing it isn't).  Why don't
> > > accusations like this trigger the media beast's radar?  It
> > > might be a needed diversion from the impending L.A. riots.
> > >
> > > --
> > > blake
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> -
> Joseph Barnhart
> Florida Digital Turnpike
> Network Administrator
> http://www.fdt.net
> http://www.agilitybb.net
> -
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




Re: CA Power

2002-07-11 Thread G. Scott Granados


As long as they leave the fiber alone:).

- Original Message - 
From: "Joseph Barnhart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:31 PM
Subject: RE: CA Power


> 
> Funny thing about rioters is they usually
> destroy their own neighborhoods...go figure.
> 
> --jb
> 
> 
> 
> > Doug Barton:
> > [deletia]
> > Reporter: So, how many generators do you have at this plant?
> > Operator: 3
> > R: How many do you have operating today?
> > O: Just one.
> > R: REALLY? But we had rolling blackouts all through San Diego County
> > today, why aren't you operating all 3 generators?
> > O: Because Cal-ISO told me to turn off #2, and not to turn #3 
> > on at all.
> > [deletia]
> > Doug
> 
> Let's assume this is true (not arguing it isn't).  Why don't
> accusations like this trigger the media beast's radar?  It 
> might be a needed diversion from the impending L.A. riots.
> 
> --
> blake
>  
>