Re: FTC, Partners Launch Campaign Against Spam "Zombies"

2005-05-24 Thread Joe Hamelin

"The FTC said it would ask 3,000 Internet providers around
the globe to make sure that their customers' computers haven't
been hijacked by spammers who want to cover their tracks and
pass bandwidth costs on to others."

"Hi! I'm from the government.  I'm here to help."


Re: "Bandwidth Advisors" - www.bandwidthadvisors.com

2005-03-28 Thread Joe Hamelin

I run all my bandwidth purchases through BWA.  I've worked with Aaron
since we were both at Wolfe.net.  He's the most honest sales type that
I've ever met.  And I agree that NANOG is NOT the place to post this,
but the cat is out of the bag.

Notice: I'm biased as I host his site and my wife made his webpages.

-- 
Joe Hamelin  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Edmonds, WA, US


Re: Earthquake in Northern California

2004-09-28 Thread Joe Hamelin

It's happening up the coast too:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002048122_sthelens28m.html

"Scientists believe there is a significant chance of a small eruption
of Mount St. Helens in the days or weeks ahead."



-- 
Joe Hamelin 
Edmonds, WA, US


Verizon mail contact

2004-09-01 Thread Joe Hamelin

I'm having some issues getting mail out to Verizon accounts from
windermere.com.  Could a verizon postmaster please contact me?

Thanks

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
206-315-4357

-- 
Joe Hamelin 
Edmonds, WA, US


Re: time to bury nethead versus bellhead polemics

2004-08-27 Thread Joe Hamelin

> "netheaded" was seen as the 'nirvana' to which the Internet would
> guide telecommunications.

And I've been netheaded since '95. ;)


-- 
Joe Hamelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]/.org/.us/.org.uk>
Edmonds, WA, US


Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall

2004-07-28 Thread Joe Hamelin

Here's what I got today from Barracuda.  I'll let you know if it did
indeed fix my problems.


Hi Joe,

Your latency problem should be resolved.


===
On July 27th a new stream of spam was introduced into the wild. This
spam contained certain formatting
aspects that were intentionally designed to cause Spam Assassin's
Bayesian implementation to run at
extremely slow speeds. Due to the way Spam Assassin handled the email,
it was taking several minutes to
process these messages and the Barracuda's internal processes would
detect the potential problem and start
queuing mail to prevent any mail loss. Unfortunately this precaution
had the byproduct of further
increasing the message latency on the system.

 
Barracuda Networks' team of engineers created a patch for this Spam
Assassin attack. The patch was
released in version 1.6.733 of the spam definitions. If you were
affected by the new spam, please make
sure you are running this version or higher of the spam definitions
(Advanced->Energize Updates in the web
GUI). Also, if you had previously contacted tech support and were
advised to disable Intention Analysis
(Basic->Bayesian/Fingerprinting) as a way to attempt to reduce
latency, you should be able to turn this
feature back on without any issues.

===

Let me know if you have any additional concerns.

Heather

Heather Russell
Barracuda Networks
408.342.5447 Direct
408.342.1061 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.barracudanetworks.com


-- 
Joe Hamelin 
Edmonds, WA, US


Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall

2004-07-27 Thread Joe Hamelin

It only seems to be a problem when I hit above about 16k messages an
hour.  I do wish they had better numerical historical logging.  Maybe
in V3.0.


On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:03:08 -0400, Matthew Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> My Series 400 seems to be doing fine today.  Average queue latency 4
> seconds which is about normal.
> 
> Do you have any special config settings?
> 
> -Matt
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 27, 2004, at 7:21 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> 
> >
> > I just talked to Heather (sales) at Barracuda and was told that there
> > would be a FIRMWARE release in the morning to fix a problem with virus
> > detection.
> >
> > It seems that the support ppl can't really do anything right now and
> > their phone system is melting.  The word is to hold tight for a fix.
> >
> > --
> > Joe Hamelin
> > Edmonds, WA, US
> >
> 
> 


-- 
Joe Hamelin 
Edmonds, WA, US


Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall

2004-07-27 Thread Joe Hamelin

I just talked to Heather (sales) at Barracuda and was told that there
would be a FIRMWARE release in the morning to fix a problem with virus
detection.

It seems that the support ppl can't really do anything right now and
their phone system is melting.  The word is to hold tight for a fix.

-- 
Joe Hamelin 
Edmonds, WA, US


Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall

2004-07-27 Thread Joe Hamelin

Is anyone else on NANOG having problems with Barracuda today?  I'm
getting massive latency (3000+ seconds) and it seems as if their tech
support has gone into meltdown.  While on hold I was even connected to
another customer with the same problem.

-- 
Joe Hamelin 
Edmonds, WA, US


Re: Conference - Preventing the Internet Meltdown

2004-06-29 Thread Joe Hamelin

Although from another thread this Vixism seems to apply well:

The internet has no government, no constitution, no laws, no
rights, no police, no courts.  Don't talk about fairness or
innocence, and don't talk about what should be done.  Instead,
talk about what is being done and what will be done by the
amorphous unreachable undefinable blob called "the internet
user base." -Paul Vixie


Re: SprintPCS spam policies

2004-06-24 Thread Joe Hamelin

When I signed up for SprintPCS I was offered a yourname @
sprintpcs.com mail account.  They let me chose an alias for the
account.  So now my cell phone has the email address of:

noc @ sprintpcs.com

This says something about how well they follow RFCs.

-- 
Joe Hamelin 
Edmonds, WA, US


Re: Unplugging spamming PCs

2004-06-23 Thread Joe Hamelin

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:40:23 -0700, Larry Pingree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I agree with you it's a hard problem to solve. But unless there is
> mandatory cooperation within mail server software (which can be
> monitored) to interface with a registry of acceptable/registered sites,
> then this model could work. 

I can telnet to a mailserver and send mail to that host without much
thought.  What good will a registry do?  What will solve spam is
getting some of these virus writers to actually write some code that
will trash disks of poorly patched (if a at all) hosts.  Let Darwin
take over.

-Joe