[newbie] Goodbye, And Thanks for All the Help
10/04/04 Hello All, The Linux From Scratch (LFS) system I'm building is coming along very nicely. I think I've finally figured out why I was getting all the XWindows crashes in Mandrake 9.1 and have fixed the problem in LFS. (I used the ModeLine statement in XF86Config to specifically set the window mode. The automatic system used by Mandrake was picking some unstable window modes for the circa 1998 video card and monitor I have.) With XWindows, modem dialup, ALSA, and CUPS up and running properly, I'm ready to focus on building my LInux music box. Thanks for all the assistance you've given me over the past year and a half. It's been fun and educational. All the Best in your endeavors, "The Other" Stephen Stubbs Champaign, IL USA Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] Sound card not working
Lyvim Xaphir disseminated the following: If you want the best quality sound drivers with the most features, I highly recommend you go to opensound.com and download the drivers for your sound card. OSS is superior to Alsa. Wha? All this time people have been telling me the opposite, 'OSS is old', 'ALSA is the future of sound on Linux' Lyvim, I'm also curious why you say OSS is superior to ALSA. From what I've been reading on the Linux-Audio-User list, OSS is rarely mentioned. It appears all the efforts to develop sound applications and utilities are using ALSA. And if I'm not mistaken, I've seen posts from you on the Linux-Audio-User list. You've intriqued me. Please explain your reasons. Stephen. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] Converting Partition from Ext2 to Ext3
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 12:28:43 +1000, Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ext3 is just ext2 plus journalling, so you don't need to reformat to convert. I presume that MCC just did a tune2fs command to add journalling and adjusted your fstab file. man tune2fs will tell you more. Thanks Brian, for the reassurance and the pointer to the commands to review. Stephen. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
[newbie] Converting Partition from Ext2 to Ext3
09/10/04 Hello All, Just want to check that I did this correctly. I converted a partition that was in Ext2 to Ext3 by going into the Mandrake Control Center, Using DiskDrake to unmount the partion, then change the type to Ext3, and then exited. I didn't format the partition after the change and I forgot to remount it. I did check the fstab file to make certain it was Ext3, and then rebooted. After the reboot, the mtab file shows the partition as Ext3. Just making sure that I didn't need to format the Ext3 partition. I rather doubt that I do because that partition was my Linux From Scratch partition and I'm booted into it right now. Everything seems okay, but I'm concerned about my first crash and if the Ext3 recovery programs will work properly. Am I okay er, let me rephrase that... is my Ext3 partition okay? GRIN "The Other' Stephen Stubbs. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
[newbie] Modem, PPP, ISPs, and Wvdial
Hello John, Maybe your problem is with the ISP and the login prompts. I haven't had time yet to work out my problem using Linux From Scratch 5.1, Wvdial, and my ISP; but here's what the ISP did for me to assist: - Instead of trying to login at the prompt, try just starting up ppp. I changed your membership on the ppp authentication server from pppmenu (login prompt) to ppponly so wvdial shouldn't try to interpret the login prompt. I also found this, which also might alleviate the problem: "Add the following line under the correct heading in your /etc/wvdial.conf file: Stupid mode = 1 " Apparently "stupid mode" tells wvdial to not login at the prompt and skip directly to starting pppd. - When I dial in now, the connection is made and the PPP daemon is started. But then I don't know what to do ??? So the PPP daemon dies after a while. As I said, I'll work on that later. Good Luck if you haven't got your connection working yet. Stephen. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] How to decypher dialupscript
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:31:19 +0100, John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In KPPP under modem, there is a line termination field with 3 choices. Hello John, When KPPP was giving me fits, I went to WVdial. That seemed to work okay. You'll have to open a terminal window and then log in as superuser to start WVdial. After it connects, use your favorite web browser/mail/whatever in another window or terminal session. When you're done, go back to the WVdial terminal session and do CTRL-C to stop WVdial. I liked this approach because I would have the KPPP daemon die on me for no readily apparent reason. The only way to get control of the system was to do a software reboot. With WVdial, you can always CTRL-C to regain control if the PPP daemon dies. Recently, my ISP had someone upstream change their connection protocol and WVdial now doesn't work for me. I'm back to using KPPP. On my Linux From Scratch box (LFS 5.1), I'm going back to PPP and use a Chat Script for logging in. At least, that's the next project. :) So try WVdial-1.53, and if that doesn't work try PPP-2.4.2. Take Care John, Stephen. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] Debian's Apt-Get or Redhat's RPM ???
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 06:35:00 -0700, David E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:28:16 +0100 Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In this respect 'deb', and 'rpm' are in my (inexpert) opinion broadly similar. What really matters is the quality of the *packager* (How Thanks for the further discussion. Linux From Scratch (LFS) mentioned a utility/program that would examine all your files before and after a compilation/install, to tell you want got files got added and where they were put. Then it would be the manual process of deleting those files if you wished to uninstall that particular application. Obviously, this utility/program wouldn't be able to deal with dependency issues. Now to determine how important it is for me to manually deal with dependency issues or use a package manager. Hmmm Thanks, David, Derek "The Other" Stephen Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] Debian's Apt-Get or Redhat's RPM ???
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:36:21 +0800, wrote: The Other wrote: Suggestions for a package manager? The down side is that I have a 56Kb Modem to use to get the updates. If its apt-get compared to plain jane rpm, there is no contest, apt-get wins hands down. If it was between apt-get and urpmX then it would be allot closer, but I'd still tip apt. Thanks Frankieh for the reply. I'll look for the source to apt-get. The Other. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] Old LInux Kernels
On Mon, 31 May 2004 12:39:38 -0500, Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Use 'rpm -qa | grep -i kernel' to list installed kernels, then 'urpme kernel-x.x.x' to remove all of of the one(s) you want to remove. Example: So if I wanted to remove all files of 2.6.5-1.tmb, including it's lilo entry, I'd su to root and type 'urpme kernel-tmb-2.6.5-1.tmb.5mdk-1-1mdk' (use copy'n paste to avoid typos). Tom, I know this method will work if you installed a kernel rpm with urpmi. But will it also work if you compiled the kernel from it's source tarball? The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
[newbie] Info Info
Hello All, Anybody else been struggling working through the Info and Man pages, trying to figure out how to navigate them? I'm still not sure how to browse the Man pages with anything other than up and down, but last night I had the insight to try something new with the Info pages. info info This got me a tutorial/lesson on how to use Tab, Space Bar, Backspace, and Delete keys. I haven't gotten through the lesson yet and still don't know how to return to the exact place you were before you Tab-Carriage Return'd into a new thread (you can always Delete key and Space key back to where you were), but I finally feel like I'm making progress with the Linux command documentation. For What It's Worth The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] arrrrggggggg
Okay, today I turned BIOS shadowing on and left the Video Shadowing off. And yes, I got 2 more BIOS upgrades and tried them out. With Video Shadowing on, they made no difference. I still had an unstable Mandrake system. So I went back to the 1998 version of the Award BIOS that came with my motherboard. I won't be changing BIOSes for this test. __ OK, but the real question I had wasn't clearly answered, which was did you have system instabilities with the system shadowing only? And why in the world would you want to run an older bios on your motherboard if a newer one is available? You're right, I wasn't clear in my post. BIOS Shadowing had always been turned off. Only Video Shadowing was turned on. I'm now running with Video Shadowing off and BIOS Shadowing on. And yes, I've noticed an improvement in program performance with BIOS Shadowing on. There's 128MB of RAM on this box. As to why I didn't stay with an updated BIOS... There was a warning in my documentation about upgrading the BIOS that said something to the effect, "If it's not broken, don't fix it." The exact reason said that while the updated BIOS may fix a few known problems, it might also introduce a few unknown problems. Oh, and it is an Award BIOS. Well, if ASUS and AWARD weren't absolutely positive about the BIOS upgrades, I didn't see any reason to add more uncertainty as to what was causing the Mandrake system instability. So I went back to the original BIOS version. The original BIOS was Version 1002, released around spring1998. Version 1011 was released around fall 1999. And Version 1012 was the last version released spring 2000. (Don't hold me to these exact dates, but I think I'm fairly close.) There wasn't much difference in the BIOS options between the 3 versions. Version 1012 offered some type of hard disk failure monitoring, which some people told me was marketing hype and others told me it was worth it and worth the performance drop. So during those 4 months I tried all 3 versions of the BIOS, and suffered the same problems. Once again, Video Shadowing was on and BIOS shadowing was off. In a perverse sort of way, I like hearing that the problem may have been the Matrox G100 AGP card and Video Shadowing. The G100 was the start of Matrox's AGP line, and could have been the victum of an early bug. The G400 card seems to be very stable. Regards, The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] arrrrggggggg
On Sat, 22 May 2004 13:36:27 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Would you do me a flavor? In the interests of Science? To test this theory of mine, that this is perhaps germane to the video card itself, would you turn on system bios shadowing, but leave video shadowing off, and see if your system remains stable. I'm curious. LX P.P.S Have you flashed your mainboard to the latest bios available for it from Asus. Okay, today I turned BIOS shadowing on and left the Video Shadowing off. And yes, I got 2 more BIOS upgrades and tried them out. With Video Shadowing on, they made no difference. I still had an unstable Mandrake system. So I went back to the 1998 version of the Award BIOS that came with my motherboard. I won't be changing BIOSes for this test. The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] arrrrggggggg
On Sat, 22 May 2004 16:46:34 -0400, Ronald J. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ->When the System Resources screen comes up during the Install, go to ->the Printer Section and make sure you do a Print Test Page. This works, but if I remember correctly it does take up an additional IRQ. One of the reasons I went to an Epson USB printer... If memory serves, IRQ 7 is typically used in PC systems for the printer. I think my old, unused, ISA Sound Blaster AWE32 would allow you to select IRQ 7, but I can't remember any other cards I've used allowing me that option. From what I've been reading on the Linux Audio Users Group, IRQ 10 is a much better choice for a sound card. IRQ 7 has the lowest priority of all of the IRQ's. Here's the order of interrupt priority, from Highest Priority to Lowest Priority: (highest) 0, 1, 8, 9, 10, 11 12, 13, 14, 15, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (lowest) So using a printer on IRQ 7 seems quite reasonable to me. What else would one use it for? Note: 0 and 1 are for block devices, 8 is for the Real Time Clock. 9 is the first IRQ you could try for, but it's sometimes used as a redirected IRQ 2; so I leave it alone. IRQ 10 is really the first high priority IRQ you can expect to get exclusive access to. The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] Opera
On Fri, 21 May 2004 13:25:33 -0400, Brant Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it me or is Opera, for mail and web browsing, looking better and better? It uses far less memory and is much faster while running on Linux. Anyone else have any feeling on it? FWIW, I like and use it. The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] arrrrggggggg
Oh, forgot to mention the other BIOS settings you may want to check: PNP OS Installed (or may be called Plug'n'Play OS Installed)-- set it to NO And to avoid some problems with your Printer being automatically detected and installed: Parallel Port Mode-- set it to ECP+EPP (or at least ECP or EPP) and have the printer connected and turned on during the Mandrake Installation. When the System Resources screen comes up during the Install, go to the Printer Section and make sure you do a Print Test Page. HTH, The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] arrrrggggggg
On Fri, 21 May 2004 12:09:24 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 08:44, The Other wrote: My solution was to turn off *all* ROM Shadowing in the BIOS. Windows doesn't mind the ROM Shadowing, but Linux wants to control all of the system's memory. When I turned off the Video ROM Shadowing in the BIOS, all problems went away. __ This is the first time I've ever heard of this. I have rom shadowing enabled religiously and have had it enabled across an entire succession of mainboards stretching back to the early 1990's. I've never encountered a problem with rom shadowing and any version of Linux, including Red Hat, Gentoo, Mandrake, Slackware or any other distro I've loaded. Moreover, in every system I've installed, I've also set the bios settings to shadow the system and video bios. Not saying that you've not seen what youve' seen, however I suspect that this problem is germane to your particular box or video card. LX Greetings LX, I'm running a circa 1998 system with Mandrake 9.1 (in the process of building LFS {Linux From Scratch} 5.0) on the following hardware: Asus P2B AGP motherboard with the Intel 440BX chipset and Award BIOS (IIRC, I know it's not a Phoenix BIOS) Intel Pentium-II MMX 350-MHz cpu Matrox G100 AGP video card I've been rock-solid since turning off the ROM Shadowing. Prior to that, 3/4 of a year with erratic errors and when I had to do a reinstall of Mandrake 9.1 because of file system corruption, it would take over 100 attempts to get through the loading software phase of the install, with a chance to bomb on the LILO setup as well. I'm a patient guy, but this was getting ridiculous. It's also a testimony of my resolve to not use Windows on the Internet. :) Also, others on this list may remember my cries for help during 2003. If there's another problem causing this problem besides ROM Shadowing, I'd love to hear what the alternative solution is. Just in case you're right and I haven't solved my problem. Thanks, The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] arrrrggggggg
On Thu, 20 May 2004 08:31:37 +0100, Philip J Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is wrong with this os. Windows loads boots and works right away, Linux for some reason allways has problems either install or booting. I have used it or been trying it since 9.1 still not got any of them to work properly. Just managed after a struggle to get 10 to boot, now i get to the opening screen and thats it. My mouse will not work at all so I cant navigate or even open a console.Anyone know how I can get the little bugger working. Philip. Sounds similar to the problems I had getting a stable Mandrake 9.1 installed and working. My solution was to turn off *all* ROM Shadowing in the BIOS. Windows doesn't mind the ROM Shadowing, but Linux wants to control all of the system's memory. When I turned off the Video ROM Shadowing in the BIOS, all problems went away. HTH, I know the frustration. It took me over 4 months to figure this solution out. Sympathies. The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] Why is my FAT always corrupted
On Wed, 19 May 2004 19:58:42 -0700, David E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 17 May 2004 17:52:23 -0500 "David A. Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the tip. I will look in syslog the next time it happens. I ran a surface scan of the disk and it said ok. I don't know how to test the RAM but I haven't had any other problems at all so I would bet the RAM is fine. Well, it pays to be prudent, so first install the memtest RPM, it will create a boot entry for it, so you can shutdown/reboot and let the test run for as long as you wish, typically overnight. It's not the most robust memory tester, but it is pretty good. Sorry I didn't catch the original post, but here's another idea to look into. Do you have *any* ROM Shadowing turned on in your BIOS? If so, turn it off. Mandrake expects to have access and control of all memory. I was getting inconsistent problems during the install of Mandrake, and then file corruption problems after the install when I had Video ROM shadowing enabled in the BIOS. HTH The Other Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] How to get IceWM 1.2.13 shown in XDM, GDM, KDM login screen ???
How do I get IceWM 1.2.13 listed in the available choices of Window Managers when I log on as a User? What and where is the configuration file I need to edit? It looks like Mandrake 9.1 only uses XDM for the graphical login. Is this correct? If so, anyone know which files XDM is using to provide the graphical login with the choices of Window Manager to use in that drop down box? I was able to run IceWM 1.2.13 by turning off the graphical login (booting directly to a text login), starting X Windows with xinit, going into the xterm box and typing icewm-sessions. Then I select another workspace to work in. But I'd really like to have this version of IceWM available as a choice in the drop down box on the graphical login screen. Ideas? TIA, The Other. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] For Opera lovers...
Anyone know how to change those tiny fonts in the body of the email messages? Thanks, Dan Hello Dan, for Opera 7.23 On the main menu bar: File-> Preferences (or Alt-P)-> Fonts (on the left side dialog box) This brings up the right side dialog box. Select the font use topic you wish to change (start with Normal, it may be the one you need) and highlight the font name. Double-click on the font name or click on the Choose button. This brings up another dialog box that lets you change the font, size, and other parameters. For my astigmatism, I like the Helvetica (Adobe) at 14. normal. in black. Regards, The Other. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
Re: [newbie] MS: We know we suck, and we don't really care.
Software issues aside, what about Windows XP affecting laptop hard drives? My boss had his second laptop hard drive failure this year. When talking to the software/hardware support people of the company, he was told that the stock of replacement laptop hard drives was very low. The reason: Windows XP is spinning the drives to death! This is a company that should have (conservative estimate) 15,000 to 25,000 laptops in service, nationwide in the USA. How long can a company afford to swap out bad laptop hard drives? Especially when using a 3rd party to make the switch. It's overnight shipping of the drives, then the 3rd party installation, then another shipping back to the company storehouses for refurbishing or whatever is done with the bad drives. The economics of the hardware failures caused by Windows XP, if uncorrected by Microsoft, will have to cause a company to switch operating systems. The Other. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
[newbie] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
04/19/04 To the List Administrator, I got this message from the mailer-daemon, but I also got me email through to the list. (If the attachment didn't come through, my email was a reply on Linuxant drivers and Winmodems.) This is the second time this has happened to me. What must I do to fix this problem? Thanks, The Other --- Forwarded message --- From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 00:18:50 +0200 (CEST) This is the Postfix program at host smtp1.mandrax.org. I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. For further assistance, please contact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below. The Postfix program <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: mail forwarding loop for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ÿþ<