Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Tony S. Sykes wrote: You can do it from mcc as well. Just choose the remove option. I know you can force it not to remove anything else other than the gtk 2 in urpmi but I am not sure if this will cause any problems (somebody else from the list may be able to answer that). Where are you in uk? It might be easier if I send you a CD with all the MDK 9.1 updates on. -Original Message- From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile Tony S. Sykes wrote: Would it not be easier to urpme the gtk and then urpmi the gtk specifying the newer version in the command line? Tony. -Original Message- From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: what should I do then, a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my d4x on M9.0 Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk? Hell, if it comes to it I can send you the rpm I built. It's only 1MB. Charles Indeed I have Charles, same gtk error. but it's those gkt libraries libgtk+2.0_0and 2:gtk+2.0 that are the problem here ? I just need a good copy of these I think , that is what those low % figures were saying ? How big are they ? John Tony, Well I think that isn't going to be easy. see here, [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpme gtk+2.0 To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed (152 MB): drakconf-9.1-13.1mdk drakcronat-0.1.3-1mdk drakfirsttime-0.91-12mdk drakxtools-9.1-31.3mdk eog-2.2.0-1mdk file-roller-2.2.1-1mdk gail-1.2.0-1mdk galeon-1.3.3-2.1mdk gdm-2.4.1.3-5mdk gedit-2.2.0.1-1mdk gnome-applets-2.2.0-2mdk gnome-control-center-2.2.0.1-2mdk gnome-desktop-2.2.0.1-2mdk gnome-games-2.2.0-2mdk gnome-media-2.2.1.1-1mdk gnome-panel-2.2.0.1-6mdk gnome-python-1.99.15-1mdk gnome-python-bonobo-1.99.15-1mdk gnome-python-canvas-1.99.15-1mdk gnome-session-2.2.0.2-2mdk gnome-system-monitor-2.0.4-4mdk gnome-telnet-2.4-4mdk gnome-terminal-2.2.1-1mdk gnome-themes-2.2-2mdk gnome-utils-2.2.0.3-1mdk gnome2-2.2.0-1mdk gnomeicu-0.98.126-2mdk gphoto-0.4.3-17mdk gramps-0.9.0-2mdk gtk+2.0-2.2.1-2mdk gtk-engines2-2.2.0-2mdk gtkam-0.1.10-2mdk harddrake-ui-9.1-31.3mdk libbonoboui-2.2.0-1mdk libbonoboui2_0-2.2.0-1mdk libeel2_2-2.2.1-1mdk libexif-gtk4-0.3.3-2mdk libexif-gtk4-devel-0.3.3-2mdk libgail17-1.2.0-1mdk libgdkcardimage0-2.2.0-2mdk libgnome-desktop-2_2-2.2.0.1-2mdk libgnomecanvas2_0-2.2.0.1-1mdk libgnomeprintui2-2_0-2.2.1.1-1mdk libgnomeui2-2.2.0.1-2mdk libgnomeui2_0-2.2.0.1-2mdk libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk libgtkhtml2_0-2.2.0-2mdk libnautilus2-2.2.1-5mdk libpanel-applet-2_0-2.2.0.1-6mdk mdkonline-0.91-2mdk mozilla-1.3.1-4.1mdk mozilla-mail-1.3.1-4.1mdk mrproject-0.9-1mdk nautilus-2.2.1-5mdk nautilus-gtkhtml-0.3.2-5mdk perl-GTK2-0.0.cvs.2003.03.04.1-2mdk perl-GTK2-devel-0.0.cvs.2003.03.04.1-2mdk rfbdrake-0.9.1-11.1mdk rpmdrake-2.1-15.1mdk screem-0.6.0-1mdk yelp-2.2.0-2mdk Is this OK? (Y/n) note the 152 MB in all, and while while it may be safe to remove , I'm extremely reluctant to sanction it , not knowing what I am doing at all. Since it wants to remove so much you can bet your bottom dollar it will want to reinstall something like as many packages, and under plain urpmi , there don't seem to be any resume facilities , which means when I get cut off by my ISP, thats it, start again. If I could use MCC update at least each updated package gets ticked off and when I manually restart the process it at leasts restarts at the beginning of the last package it was updating, tiresome but achievable, whereas plain urpmi makes you start all over again, at least it did for me last time I tried it, I don't pretend to know and understand these urpmi stuff well. Cann't I simply urpmi libgtk+2.0_0,urpmi gtk+2.0 and won't it simply overwrite the existing installs. John Which remove option should I elect to use in MCC ? I still haven't figured it all out yet, if I choose main, is seems to inply the lot, but surely the others don't have the required libraries, but in any case I've only just none this recently about 1 1/2 days ago. I remobed the lot from the list and updated the , what's it called, headlist? whatever , and then downloaded the updates, so I'm up todate as far as MCC thinks it should be . Still confused, John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
You can do it from mcc as well. Just choose the remove option. I know you can force it not to remove anything else other than the gtk 2 in urpmi but I am not sure if this will cause any problems (somebody else from the list may be able to answer that). Where are you in uk? It might be easier if I send you a CD with all the MDK 9.1 updates on. -Original Message- From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile Tony S. Sykes wrote: >Would it not be easier to urpme the gtk and then urpmi the gtk >specifying the newer version in the command line? > >Tony. > >-Original Message- >From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:45 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile > > >Charles A Edwards wrote: > > > >>On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100 >>John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>what should I do then, >>>a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my >>>d4x on M9.0 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk? >> >>Hell, if it comes to it I can send you the rpm I built. >>It's only 1MB. >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >Indeed I have Charles, same gtk error. > >but it's those gkt libraries libgtk+2.0_0and 2:gtk+2.0 > >that are the problem here ? >I just need a good copy of these I think , that is what those low % >figures were saying ? >How big are they ? > > > >John > > Tony, Well I think that isn't going to be easy. see here, [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpme gtk+2.0 To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed (152 MB): drakconf-9.1-13.1mdk drakcronat-0.1.3-1mdk drakfirsttime-0.91-12mdk drakxtools-9.1-31.3mdk eog-2.2.0-1mdk file-roller-2.2.1-1mdk gail-1.2.0-1mdk galeon-1.3.3-2.1mdk gdm-2.4.1.3-5mdk gedit-2.2.0.1-1mdk gnome-applets-2.2.0-2mdk gnome-control-center-2.2.0.1-2mdk gnome-desktop-2.2.0.1-2mdk gnome-games-2.2.0-2mdk gnome-media-2.2.1.1-1mdk gnome-panel-2.2.0.1-6mdk gnome-python-1.99.15-1mdk gnome-python-bonobo-1.99.15-1mdk gnome-python-canvas-1.99.15-1mdk gnome-session-2.2.0.2-2mdk gnome-system-monitor-2.0.4-4mdk gnome-telnet-2.4-4mdk gnome-terminal-2.2.1-1mdk gnome-themes-2.2-2mdk gnome-utils-2.2.0.3-1mdk gnome2-2.2.0-1mdk gnomeicu-0.98.126-2mdk gphoto-0.4.3-17mdk gramps-0.9.0-2mdk gtk+2.0-2.2.1-2mdk gtk-engines2-2.2.0-2mdk gtkam-0.1.10-2mdk harddrake-ui-9.1-31.3mdk libbonoboui-2.2.0-1mdk libbonoboui2_0-2.2.0-1mdk libeel2_2-2.2.1-1mdk libexif-gtk4-0.3.3-2mdk libexif-gtk4-devel-0.3.3-2mdk libgail17-1.2.0-1mdk libgdkcardimage0-2.2.0-2mdk libgnome-desktop-2_2-2.2.0.1-2mdk libgnomecanvas2_0-2.2.0.1-1mdk libgnomeprintui2-2_0-2.2.1.1-1mdk libgnomeui2-2.2.0.1-2mdk libgnomeui2_0-2.2.0.1-2mdk libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk libgtkhtml2_0-2.2.0-2mdk libnautilus2-2.2.1-5mdk libpanel-applet-2_0-2.2.0.1-6mdk mdkonline-0.91-2mdk mozilla-1.3.1-4.1mdk mozilla-mail-1.3.1-4.1mdk mrproject-0.9-1mdk nautilus-2.2.1-5mdk nautilus-gtkhtml-0.3.2-5mdk perl-GTK2-0.0.cvs.2003.03.04.1-2mdk perl-GTK2-devel-0.0.cvs.2003.03.04.1-2mdk rfbdrake-0.9.1-11.1mdk rpmdrake-2.1-15.1mdk screem-0.6.0-1mdk yelp-2.2.0-2mdk Is this OK? (Y/n) note the 152 MB in all, and while while it may be safe to remove , I'm extremely reluctant to sanction it , not knowing what I am doing at all. Since it wants to remove so much you can bet your bottom dollar it will want to reinstall something like as many packages, and under plain urpmi , there don't seem to be any resume facilities , which means when I get cut off by my ISP, thats it, start again. If I could use MCC update at least each updated package gets ticked off and when I manually restart the process it at leasts restarts at the beginning of the last package it was updating, tiresome but achievable, whereas plain urpmi makes you start all over again, at least it did for me last time I tried it, I don't pretend to know and understand these urpmi stuff well. Cann't I simply urpmi libgtk+2.0_0,urpmi gtk+2.0 and won't it simply overwrite the existing installs. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Tony S. Sykes wrote: Would it not be easier to urpme the gtk and then urpmi the gtk specifying the newer version in the command line? Tony. -Original Message- From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: what should I do then, a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my d4x on M9.0 Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk? Hell, if it comes to it I can send you the rpm I built. It's only 1MB. Charles Indeed I have Charles, same gtk error. but it's those gkt libraries libgtk+2.0_0and 2:gtk+2.0 that are the problem here ? I just need a good copy of these I think , that is what those low % figures were saying ? How big are they ? John Tony, Well I think that isn't going to be easy. see here, [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpme gtk+2.0 To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed (152 MB): drakconf-9.1-13.1mdk drakcronat-0.1.3-1mdk drakfirsttime-0.91-12mdk drakxtools-9.1-31.3mdk eog-2.2.0-1mdk file-roller-2.2.1-1mdk gail-1.2.0-1mdk galeon-1.3.3-2.1mdk gdm-2.4.1.3-5mdk gedit-2.2.0.1-1mdk gnome-applets-2.2.0-2mdk gnome-control-center-2.2.0.1-2mdk gnome-desktop-2.2.0.1-2mdk gnome-games-2.2.0-2mdk gnome-media-2.2.1.1-1mdk gnome-panel-2.2.0.1-6mdk gnome-python-1.99.15-1mdk gnome-python-bonobo-1.99.15-1mdk gnome-python-canvas-1.99.15-1mdk gnome-session-2.2.0.2-2mdk gnome-system-monitor-2.0.4-4mdk gnome-telnet-2.4-4mdk gnome-terminal-2.2.1-1mdk gnome-themes-2.2-2mdk gnome-utils-2.2.0.3-1mdk gnome2-2.2.0-1mdk gnomeicu-0.98.126-2mdk gphoto-0.4.3-17mdk gramps-0.9.0-2mdk gtk+2.0-2.2.1-2mdk gtk-engines2-2.2.0-2mdk gtkam-0.1.10-2mdk harddrake-ui-9.1-31.3mdk libbonoboui-2.2.0-1mdk libbonoboui2_0-2.2.0-1mdk libeel2_2-2.2.1-1mdk libexif-gtk4-0.3.3-2mdk libexif-gtk4-devel-0.3.3-2mdk libgail17-1.2.0-1mdk libgdkcardimage0-2.2.0-2mdk libgnome-desktop-2_2-2.2.0.1-2mdk libgnomecanvas2_0-2.2.0.1-1mdk libgnomeprintui2-2_0-2.2.1.1-1mdk libgnomeui2-2.2.0.1-2mdk libgnomeui2_0-2.2.0.1-2mdk libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk libgtkhtml2_0-2.2.0-2mdk libnautilus2-2.2.1-5mdk libpanel-applet-2_0-2.2.0.1-6mdk mdkonline-0.91-2mdk mozilla-1.3.1-4.1mdk mozilla-mail-1.3.1-4.1mdk mrproject-0.9-1mdk nautilus-2.2.1-5mdk nautilus-gtkhtml-0.3.2-5mdk perl-GTK2-0.0.cvs.2003.03.04.1-2mdk perl-GTK2-devel-0.0.cvs.2003.03.04.1-2mdk rfbdrake-0.9.1-11.1mdk rpmdrake-2.1-15.1mdk screem-0.6.0-1mdk yelp-2.2.0-2mdk Is this OK? (Y/n) note the 152 MB in all, and while while it may be safe to remove , I'm extremely reluctant to sanction it , not knowing what I am doing at all. Since it wants to remove so much you can bet your bottom dollar it will want to reinstall something like as many packages, and under plain urpmi , there don't seem to be any resume facilities , which means when I get cut off by my ISP, thats it, start again. If I could use MCC update at least each updated package gets ticked off and when I manually restart the process it at leasts restarts at the beginning of the last package it was updating, tiresome but achievable, whereas plain urpmi makes you start all over again, at least it did for me last time I tried it, I don't pretend to know and understand these urpmi stuff well. Cann't I simply urpmi libgtk+2.0_0,urpmi gtk+2.0 and won't it simply overwrite the existing installs. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
Would it not be easier to urpme the gtk and then urpmi the gtk specifying the newer version in the command line? Tony. -Original Message- From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile Charles A Edwards wrote: >On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100 >John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>what should I do then, >>a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my >>d4x on M9.0 >> >> > > > >Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk? > >Hell, if it comes to it I can send you the rpm I built. >It's only 1MB. > > >Charles > > > Indeed I have Charles, same gtk error. but it's those gkt libraries libgtk+2.0_0and 2:gtk+2.0 that are the problem here ? I just need a good copy of these I think , that is what those low % figures were saying ? How big are they ? John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] -+-+-+-+-+-+-+- Business Computer Projects - Disclaimer -+-+-+-+-+-+-+- This message, and any associated attachment is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify either Tony S. Sykes or the postmaster <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not necessarily the views of Business Computer Projects Ltd., unless specifically stated. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that emails and their attachments are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient(s) to verify the integrity of such emails. Business Computer Projects Ltd BCP House 151 Charles Street Stockport Cheshire SK1 3JY Tel: +44 (0)161 355-3000 Fax: +44 (0)161 355-3001 Web: http://www.bcpsoftware.com <http://www.bcpsoftware.com/> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: what should I do then, a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my d4x on M9.0 Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk? Hell, if it comes to it I can send you the rpm I built. It's only 1MB. Charles Indeed I have Charles, same gtk error. but it's those gkt libraries libgtk+2.0_0and 2:gtk+2.0 that are the problem here ? I just need a good copy of these I think , that is what those low % figures were saying ? How big are they ? John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what should I do then, > a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my > d4x on M9.0 Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk? Hell, if it comes to it I can send you the rpm I built. It's only 1MB. Charles -- Stay the curse. - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
JoeHill wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going to have to be updated somehow ? Nah, could be that the D4X package is looking in the wrong place for your GTK libs. It shouldn't be doing this since it is an MDK src.rpm... now that you do have everything installed, if you haven't already, run "ldconfig", which hopefully make sure all library paths are properly resolved. so, [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# ldconfig ldconfig: /usr is not a known library type [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# Errr,. John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going to have to be updated somehow ? John I am running the same versions as you on my 9.1 system. It is more apt that 1 are all of your gtk+2 rpms did not get properly installed. Make a directory in /home and copy and to it the rpms for gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel. cd to that directory and do # rpm -ivh --force *rpm then try the d4x build again. Charles Charles, you right, my dear sir, so, copied of CD1+CD2 , :libgtk+2.0_0, gtk+2.0 , and libgtk+2.0_0-devel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /root/Desktop/test1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test1]# rpm -ivh --force *rpm Preparing...### [100%] 1:libgtk+2.0_0 ### [ 33%] 2:gtk+2.0### [ 66%] 3:libgtk+2.0_0-devel ### [100%] So it looks like libgtk+2.0_0 and gtk+2.0 are knackered. what should I do then, a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my d4x on M9.0 John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: > So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going > to have to be updated somehow ? Nah, could be that the D4X package is looking in the wrong place for your GTK libs. It shouldn't be doing this since it is an MDK src.rpm... now that you do have everything installed, if you haven't already, run "ldconfig", which hopefully make sure all library paths are properly resolved. -- Joehill Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: http://nodex.sytes.net 08:56:33 up 9 days, 7:00, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going > to have to be updated somehow ? John I am running the same versions as you on my 9.1 system. It is more apt that 1 are all of your gtk+2 rpms did not get properly installed. Make a directory in /home and copy and to it the rpms for gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel. cd to that directory and do # rpm -ivh --force *rpm then try the d4x build again. Charles -- [...] Vimes's grin was as funny as the one that moves very fast towards drowning men. And has a fin on top. (Jingo) - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Charles A Edwards wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:51 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: can you help me once more and give me the precise url for d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/ or you ca use another mirror of your choice. Charles OK done that , but, [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /pk [EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# ls = d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm nt-2.0-5.src.rpm d4x-2.03-1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.1-fr1.src.rpm [EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# rpm --rebuild d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm Installing d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm error: failed build dependencies: libesound-devel is needed by d4x-2.4.1-2mdk libatk-devel is needed by d4x-2.4.1-2mdk [EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# == [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libesound-devel To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (0 MB): libaudiofile0-devel-0.2.3-3mdk.i586 libesound0-devel-0.2.29-2mdk.i586 Is this OK? (Y/n) y eject: unable to eject, last error: Invalid argument Please insert the medium named "Installation CD 2 (x86) (cdrom2)" on device [/dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/cd] Press Enter when ready... installing /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS2/libesound0-devel-0.2.29-2mdk.i586.rpm /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS2/libaudiofile0-devel-0.2.3-3mdk.i586.rpm Preparing... ## 1:libaudiofile0-devel ## 2:libesound0-devel ## [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libatk-devel installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/libatk1.0_0-devel-1.2.2-1mdk.i586.rpm Preparing... ## 1:libatk1.0_0-devel ## [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libesound-devel Everything already installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libatk-devel Everything already installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# == [EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# rpm --rebuild d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm Installing d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8347 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD + rm -rf /var/tmp/d4x-2.4.1-2mdk-buildroot + cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD checking for rpm... /bin/rpm checking for dot... no checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for esd-config... /usr/bin/esd-config checking for ESD - version >= 0.2.7... yes checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.6... yes (version 2.2.1) checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.6... no *** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly installed. configure: error: *** GTK >= 2.0.6 not installed! *** error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71141 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71141 (%build) [EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going to have to be updated somehow ? John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 12:26 pm, Tony S. Sykes wrote: > Dennis, > > You being in the military do you play Army Operations? No, sorry, I don't have the time. Full time job and full time Cabinetry and repair business at home. -- Dennis M. linux user #180842 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:51 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can you help me once more and give me the precise url for > > d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/ or you ca use another mirror of your choice. Charles -- Another Armenia, Belgium ... the weak innocents who always seem to be located on a natural invasion route. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.4 - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:51 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can you help me once more and give me the precise url for > > d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/ or you ca use another mirror of your choice. Charles -- Another Armenia, Belgium ... the weak innocents who always seem to be located on a natural invasion route. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.4 - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Charles A Edwards wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:51:15 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk dependency ? It's some other gtk package ? Actually the problem is that you have too much installed. When you try to rebuild d4x it is linking to libgtk+1.2-1.2.10 so it fails the gtk dependency check. This is a gtk issue and not a Mandrake issue. A couple of things you can do rebuild d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm. rpm -e --nodeps libgtk+1.2 libgtk+1.2-devel Rebuild d4x and them re-install the gtk+1.2 rpms. Or do what I just did on my 9.1 system and rebuild the cooker d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm. It correctly finds the proper version of gtk+ when multiple versions are installed. Charles Well I'll do that then, can you help me once more and give me the precise url for d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm thanks, John -- John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Richard Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
> At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
>>
>> BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
>> urpmq --fuzzy
>>
>>
>> Charles
>
Thanks Charles,
Now this is how it went,
first,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep gtk
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
gtkdialogs-2.0-3mdk
libgtkxmhtml1-1.4.2-3mdk
libgtkhtml2_0-2.2.0-2mdk
gtk-engines2-2.2.0-2mdk
nautilus-gtkhtml-0.3.2-5mdk
libgtkmm1.2-1.2.10-1mdk
libgtkmm1.2-devel-1.2.10-1mdk
ruby-gtk-0.28-1mdk
hotplug-gtk-2002_04_01-8mdk
libgtkspell0-2.0.3-3mdk
gtkhtml-1.1.10-2.1mdk
gtk+2.0-2.2.1-2mdk
gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk
gtk-themes-1.0-9mdk
gtkam-0.1.10-2mdk
libgtkglarea5-1.2.3-5mdk
gtkeyboard-1.1.7-3mdk
gtk+licq-0.51-11mdk
gtktalog-1.0.0-1mdk
libgtkglarea5-devel-1.2.3-5mdk
pygtk-glarea-0.6.9-6mdk
gtkgraph-0.6.2-5mdk
gtk+licq-nognome-0.51-11mdk
libexif-gtk4-devel-0.3.3-2mdk
libgtkodbcconfig0-2.2.4-1mdk
unixODBC-gui-gtk-2.2.4-1mdk
pygtk2.0-wrapper-1.99.15-5mdk
pygtk2.0-1.99.15-5mdk
pygtk2.0-libglade-1.99.15-5mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk
gtk-engines-0.12-7mdk
libexif-gtk4-0.3.3-2mdk
libgtk+1.2-devel-1.2.10-32mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-devel-0.1.6-14mdk
pygtk-libglade-0.6.9-6mdk
gtk+licq-base-0.51-11mdk
libgtk+-linuxfb-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtkhtml1.1_3-1.1.10-2.1mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
so then,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libgtk+2.0_0-devel
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi gtk+2.0
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# libgtk+2.0_0
bash: libgtk+2.0_0: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libgtk+2.0_0
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
so everything is installed,
but again,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /pk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# ls
= d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.1-fr1.src.rpm
d4x-2.03-1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm nt-2.0-5.src.rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# rpm --rebuild d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
Installing d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
< big snip >
checking for GNU gettext in libc... yes
checking for autogen... ${SHELL}
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run autogen
checking for doxygen... ${SHELL}
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run doxygen
checking for rpm... /bin/rpm
checking for dot... no
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for esd-config... no
checking for ESD - version >= 0.2.7... no
*** The esd-config script installed by ESD could not be found
*** If ESD was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in
*** your path, or set the ESD_CONFIG environment variable to the
*** full path to esd-config.
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.6... yes (version 2.2.1)
checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.6... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly
installed.
configure: error: *** GTK >= 2.0.6 not installed! ***
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003 (%build)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]#
note,
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.6... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly
installed.
which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk
dependency ?
It's some other gtk package ?
John
John, looks like you have gtk-2.0_2 and it is looking for 2.0.6 HTH,
Dennis M.
What's the best way of doing that then ?
John
--
John Richard Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:51:15 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk > dependency ? > > It's some other gtk package ? Actually the problem is that you have too much installed. When you try to rebuild d4x it is linking to libgtk+1.2-1.2.10 so it fails the gtk dependency check. This is a gtk issue and not a Mandrake issue. A couple of things you can do rebuild d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm. rpm -e --nodeps libgtk+1.2 libgtk+1.2-devel Rebuild d4x and them re-install the gtk+1.2 rpms. Or do what I just did on my 9.1 system and rebuild the cooker d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm. It correctly finds the proper version of gtk+ when multiple versions are installed. Charles -- There is no substitute for good manners, except, perhaps, fast reflexes. - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
Title: RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
Dennis,
You
being in the military do you play Army Operations?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June
11, 2003 5:14 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
-Original Message- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of John Richard Smith Sent: Wednesday, June 11,
2003 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
> At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote: > >> You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0,
and libgtk+2.0_0-devel >> >> BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try
using >> urpmq --fuzzy
>> >> >> Charles >
Thanks Charles,
Now this is how it went,
first, [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa |
grep gtk libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk gtkdialogs-2.0-3mdk libgtkxmhtml1-1.4.2-3mdk libgtkhtml2_0-2.2.0-2mdk gtk-engines2-2.2.0-2mdk nautilus-gtkhtml-0.3.2-5mdk libgtkmm1.2-1.2.10-1mdk libgtkmm1.2-devel-1.2.10-1mdk ruby-gtk-0.28-1mdk hotplug-gtk-2002_04_01-8mdk libgtkspell0-2.0.3-3mdk gtkhtml-1.1.10-2.1mdk gtk+2.0-2.2.1-2mdk
gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk gtk-themes-1.0-9mdk gtkam-0.1.10-2mdk
libgtkglarea5-1.2.3-5mdk gtkeyboard-1.1.7-3mdk gtk+licq-0.51-11mdk gtktalog-1.0.0-1mdk
libgtkglarea5-devel-1.2.3-5mdk pygtk-glarea-0.6.9-6mdk gtkgraph-0.6.2-5mdk gtk+licq-nognome-0.51-11mdk libexif-gtk4-devel-0.3.3-2mdk libgtkodbcconfig0-2.2.4-1mdk unixODBC-gui-gtk-2.2.4-1mdk pygtk2.0-wrapper-1.99.15-5mdk pygtk2.0-1.99.15-5mdk pygtk2.0-libglade-1.99.15-5mdk libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk gtk-engines-0.12-7mdk libexif-gtk4-0.3.3-2mdk libgtk+1.2-devel-1.2.10-32mdk libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk libgtk+mdk0.1_6-devel-0.1.6-14mdk pygtk-libglade-0.6.9-6mdk gtk+licq-base-0.51-11mdk libgtk+-linuxfb-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk libgtkhtml1.1_3-1.1.10-2.1mdk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
root]#
so then, [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi
libgtk+2.0_0-devel Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi gtk+2.0 Everything already installed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
root]# libgtk+2.0_0 bash: libgtk+2.0_0: command not
found [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libgtk+2.0_0
Everything already installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
so everything is installed,
but again,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /pk [EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# ls =
d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.1-fr1.src.rpm d4x-2.03-1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
nt-2.0-5.src.rpm [EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# rpm --rebuild
d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm Installing
d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
< big snip >
checking for GNU gettext in libc... yes checking for autogen... ${SHELL} /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run autogen
checking for doxygen... ${SHELL} /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run doxygen
checking for rpm... /bin/rpm checking
for dot... no checking whether ln -s works...
yes checking for esd-config... no checking for ESD - version >= 0.2.7... no *** The esd-config script installed by ESD could not be found
*** If ESD was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is
in *** your path, or set the ESD_CONFIG environment
variable to the *** full path to esd-config.
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.6... yes (version
2.2.1) checking for pkg-config... (cached)
/usr/bin/pkg-config checking for GTK+ - version >=
2.0.6... no *** Could not run GTK+ test program,
checking why... *** The test program failed to compile
or link. See the file config.log for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is
incorrectly installed. configure: error: *** GTK >= 2.0.6 not installed! ***
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003
(%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003 (%build) [EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]#
note, checking for GTK+ - version
>= 2.0.6... no *** Could not run GTK+ test program,
checking why... *** The test program failed to compile
or link. See the file config.log for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is
incorrectly installed.
which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk
dependency ?
It's some other gtk package ?
John
John, looks like you have gtk-2.0_2 and it is looking for
2.0.6 HTH, Dennis M.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- Business Computer Projects - Disclaimer -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
This message, and any associated attachment is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify either Tony S. Sykes
or the postmaster
immediately.
The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not necessarily the views of Business Computer Projects Ltd., unless specifically
RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
Title: RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Richard Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
> At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
>>
>> BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
>> urpmq --fuzzy
>>
>>
>> Charles
>
Thanks Charles,
Now this is how it went,
first,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep gtk
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
gtkdialogs-2.0-3mdk
libgtkxmhtml1-1.4.2-3mdk
libgtkhtml2_0-2.2.0-2mdk
gtk-engines2-2.2.0-2mdk
nautilus-gtkhtml-0.3.2-5mdk
libgtkmm1.2-1.2.10-1mdk
libgtkmm1.2-devel-1.2.10-1mdk
ruby-gtk-0.28-1mdk
hotplug-gtk-2002_04_01-8mdk
libgtkspell0-2.0.3-3mdk
gtkhtml-1.1.10-2.1mdk
gtk+2.0-2.2.1-2mdk
gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk
gtk-themes-1.0-9mdk
gtkam-0.1.10-2mdk
libgtkglarea5-1.2.3-5mdk
gtkeyboard-1.1.7-3mdk
gtk+licq-0.51-11mdk
gtktalog-1.0.0-1mdk
libgtkglarea5-devel-1.2.3-5mdk
pygtk-glarea-0.6.9-6mdk
gtkgraph-0.6.2-5mdk
gtk+licq-nognome-0.51-11mdk
libexif-gtk4-devel-0.3.3-2mdk
libgtkodbcconfig0-2.2.4-1mdk
unixODBC-gui-gtk-2.2.4-1mdk
pygtk2.0-wrapper-1.99.15-5mdk
pygtk2.0-1.99.15-5mdk
pygtk2.0-libglade-1.99.15-5mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk
gtk-engines-0.12-7mdk
libexif-gtk4-0.3.3-2mdk
libgtk+1.2-devel-1.2.10-32mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-devel-0.1.6-14mdk
pygtk-libglade-0.6.9-6mdk
gtk+licq-base-0.51-11mdk
libgtk+-linuxfb-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtkhtml1.1_3-1.1.10-2.1mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
so then,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libgtk+2.0_0-devel
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi gtk+2.0
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# libgtk+2.0_0
bash: libgtk+2.0_0: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libgtk+2.0_0
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
so everything is installed,
but again,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /pk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# ls
= d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.1-fr1.src.rpm
d4x-2.03-1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm nt-2.0-5.src.rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# rpm --rebuild d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
Installing d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
< big snip >
checking for GNU gettext in libc... yes
checking for autogen... ${SHELL}
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run autogen
checking for doxygen... ${SHELL}
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run doxygen
checking for rpm... /bin/rpm
checking for dot... no
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for esd-config... no
checking for ESD - version >= 0.2.7... no
*** The esd-config script installed by ESD could not be found
*** If ESD was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in
*** your path, or set the ESD_CONFIG environment variable to the
*** full path to esd-config.
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.6... yes (version 2.2.1)
checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.6... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly
installed.
configure: error: *** GTK >= 2.0.6 not installed! ***
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003 (%build)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]#
note,
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.6... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly
installed.
which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk dependency ?
It's some other gtk package ?
John
John, looks like you have gtk-2.0_2 and it is looking for 2.0.6 HTH, Dennis M.
RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
John,
Looks like your gtk version is not upto date.
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
> At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
>>
>> BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
>> urpmq --fuzzy
>>
>>
>> Charles
>
Thanks Charles,
Now this is how it went,
first,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep gtk
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
gtkdialogs-2.0-3mdk
libgtkxmhtml1-1.4.2-3mdk
libgtkhtml2_0-2.2.0-2mdk
gtk-engines2-2.2.0-2mdk
nautilus-gtkhtml-0.3.2-5mdk
libgtkmm1.2-1.2.10-1mdk
libgtkmm1.2-devel-1.2.10-1mdk
ruby-gtk-0.28-1mdk
hotplug-gtk-2002_04_01-8mdk
libgtkspell0-2.0.3-3mdk
gtkhtml-1.1.10-2.1mdk
gtk+2.0-2.2.1-2mdk
gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk
gtk-themes-1.0-9mdk
gtkam-0.1.10-2mdk
libgtkglarea5-1.2.3-5mdk
gtkeyboard-1.1.7-3mdk
gtk+licq-0.51-11mdk
gtktalog-1.0.0-1mdk
libgtkglarea5-devel-1.2.3-5mdk
pygtk-glarea-0.6.9-6mdk
gtkgraph-0.6.2-5mdk
gtk+licq-nognome-0.51-11mdk
libexif-gtk4-devel-0.3.3-2mdk
libgtkodbcconfig0-2.2.4-1mdk
unixODBC-gui-gtk-2.2.4-1mdk
pygtk2.0-wrapper-1.99.15-5mdk
pygtk2.0-1.99.15-5mdk
pygtk2.0-libglade-1.99.15-5mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk
gtk-engines-0.12-7mdk
libexif-gtk4-0.3.3-2mdk
libgtk+1.2-devel-1.2.10-32mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-devel-0.1.6-14mdk
pygtk-libglade-0.6.9-6mdk
gtk+licq-base-0.51-11mdk
libgtk+-linuxfb-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtkhtml1.1_3-1.1.10-2.1mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
so then,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libgtk+2.0_0-devel
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi gtk+2.0
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# libgtk+2.0_0
bash: libgtk+2.0_0: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libgtk+2.0_0
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
so everything is installed,
but again,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /pk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# ls
= d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.1-fr1.src.rpm
d4x-2.03-1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm nt-2.0-5.src.rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# rpm --rebuild d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
Installing d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
< big snip >
checking for GNU gettext in libc... yes
checking for autogen... ${SHELL}
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run autogen
checking for doxygen... ${SHELL}
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run doxygen
checking for rpm... /bin/rpm
checking for dot... no
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for esd-config... no
checking for ESD - version >= 0.2.7... no
*** The esd-config script installed by ESD could not be found
*** If ESD was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in
*** your path, or set the ESD_CONFIG environment variable to the
*** full path to esd-config.
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.6... yes (version 2.2.1)
checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.6... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly
installed.
configure: error: *** GTK >= 2.0.6 not installed! ***
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003 (%build)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]#
note,
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.6... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly
installed.
which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk
dependency ?
It's some other gtk package ?
John
--
John Richard Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- Business Computer Projects - Disclaimer -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
This message, and any associated attachment is confidential. If you have
received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or
disclose the information in any way, and notify either Tony S. Sykes
or the postmaster <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immediately.
The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not
necessarily the views of Business Computer Projects Ltd., unless
specifically stated.
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that emails and their
attachments are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient(s)
to verify the integrity of such emails.
Business Computer Projects Ltd
BCP House
151 Charles Street
Stockport
Cheshire
SK1 3JY
Tel: +44 (0)161 355-3000
Fax: +44 (0)161 355-3001
Web: http://www.bcpsoftware.com <http://www.bcpsoftware.com/>
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
urpmq --fuzzy
Charles
Thanks Charles,
Now this is how it went,
first,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep gtk
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
gtkdialogs-2.0-3mdk
libgtkxmhtml1-1.4.2-3mdk
libgtkhtml2_0-2.2.0-2mdk
gtk-engines2-2.2.0-2mdk
nautilus-gtkhtml-0.3.2-5mdk
libgtkmm1.2-1.2.10-1mdk
libgtkmm1.2-devel-1.2.10-1mdk
ruby-gtk-0.28-1mdk
hotplug-gtk-2002_04_01-8mdk
libgtkspell0-2.0.3-3mdk
gtkhtml-1.1.10-2.1mdk
gtk+2.0-2.2.1-2mdk
gtk+mdk-0.1.6-14mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-0.1.6-14mdk
gtk-themes-1.0-9mdk
gtkam-0.1.10-2mdk
libgtkglarea5-1.2.3-5mdk
gtkeyboard-1.1.7-3mdk
gtk+licq-0.51-11mdk
gtktalog-1.0.0-1mdk
libgtkglarea5-devel-1.2.3-5mdk
pygtk-glarea-0.6.9-6mdk
gtkgraph-0.6.2-5mdk
gtk+licq-nognome-0.51-11mdk
libexif-gtk4-devel-0.3.3-2mdk
libgtkodbcconfig0-2.2.4-1mdk
unixODBC-gui-gtk-2.2.4-1mdk
pygtk2.0-wrapper-1.99.15-5mdk
pygtk2.0-1.99.15-5mdk
pygtk2.0-libglade-1.99.15-5mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtk+1.2-1.2.10-32mdk
gtk-engines-0.12-7mdk
libexif-gtk4-0.3.3-2mdk
libgtk+1.2-devel-1.2.10-32mdk
libgtk+2.0_0-devel-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtk+mdk0.1_6-devel-0.1.6-14mdk
pygtk-libglade-0.6.9-6mdk
gtk+licq-base-0.51-11mdk
libgtk+-linuxfb-2.0_0-2.2.1-2mdk
libgtkhtml1.1_3-1.1.10-2.1mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
so then,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libgtk+2.0_0-devel
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi gtk+2.0
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# libgtk+2.0_0
bash: libgtk+2.0_0: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi libgtk+2.0_0
Everything already installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
so everything is installed,
but again,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /pk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# ls
= d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.1-fr1.src.rpm
d4x-2.03-1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm nt-2.0-5.src.rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# rpm --rebuild d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
Installing d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
< big snip >
checking for GNU gettext in libc... yes
checking for autogen... ${SHELL}
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run autogen
checking for doxygen... ${SHELL}
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/d4x-2.4.0/admin/missing --run doxygen
checking for rpm... /bin/rpm
checking for dot... no
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for esd-config... no
checking for ESD - version >= 0.2.7... no
*** The esd-config script installed by ESD could not be found
*** If ESD was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in
*** your path, or set the ESD_CONFIG environment variable to the
*** full path to esd-config.
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.6... yes (version 2.2.1)
checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.6... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly
installed.
configure: error: *** GTK >= 2.0.6 not installed! ***
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003 (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49003 (%build)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]#
note,
checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.6... no
*** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
for the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly
installed.
which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk dependency ?
It's some other gtk package ?
John
--
John Richard Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote: You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using urpmq --fuzzy Charles So thats what "Fuzzy" Does TY!!! omg the freaking INFO file sucks on that one... i had a helluva time trying to figure out wtf it meant... I was thinking "Mohair went out with the 70's... so not that... Fuzzy logic??? .. Angora!?!" :D Ty! - FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt Good Decisions Your boss Made: "We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that character from Peanuts." - Source: Dilbert Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:59:18 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so which packages do I need to complete the compile satisfactorilly. You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using urpmq --fuzzy Charles -- Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive. -- Shakespeare - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:59:18 +0100 John Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: > so which packages do I need to complete the compile satisfactorilly. I *think* you need to refer to it as "gtk", not "GTK", ie. it is case sensitive. Try this: rpm -qa | grep gtk Most likely what you need is libgtk-devel. -- Joehill Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: http://nodex.sytes.net 15:52:52 up 7 days, 13:56, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.02 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[newbie] D4X Compile
The urpmi install version of D4X on M9.1 is broken, and will not resume
on any site that has resume facilities, so I'm trying to roll my own.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cd /pk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# ls
= d4x-2.4-0.1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.1-fr1.src.rpm
d4x-2.03-1mdk.src.rpm d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm nt-2.0-5.src.rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pk]# rpm --rebuild d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
Installing d4x-2.4.0-1mdk.src.rpm
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.52324
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD
+ rm -rf /var/tmp/d4x-2.4.0-1mdk-buildroot
+ cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD
+ rm -rf d4x-2.4.0
+ tar -xf -
+ /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /usr/src/RPM/SOURCES/d4x-2.4.0.tar.bz2
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd d4x-2.4.0
+ exit 0
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.64295
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD
+ cd d4x-2.4.0
+ CONFIGURE_TOP=.
+ CFLAGS=-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -mcpu=pentiumpro
+ export CFLAGS
+ CXXFLAGS=-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -mcpu=pentiumpro
+ export CXXFLAGS
+ FFLAGS=-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -mcpu=pentiumpro
+ export FFLAGS
+ cd .
+ '[' -f configure.in -o -f configure.ac ']'
+ libtoolize --copy --force
Remember to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' to `configure.in'.
Using `AC_PROG_RANLIB' is rendered obsolete by `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'
You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
Putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `admin'.
+ ./configure --build=i586-mandrake-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
--exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin
--sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include
--libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --localstatedir=/var/lib
--sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-release --program-transform-name=s/x/x/g
checking build system type... i586-mandrake-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i586-mandrake-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i586-mandrake-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for g++... g++
checking for C++ compiler default output... a.out
checking whether the C++ compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for gawk... (cached) gawk
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
checking for msgmerge... /usr/bin/msgmerge
checking for strerror in -lcposix... no
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for inline... inline
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for off_t... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking for working alloca.h... yes
checking for alloca... yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for getpagesize... yes
checking for working mmap... yes
checking whether we are using the GNU C Library 2.1 or newer... yes
checking whether integer division by zero raises SIGFPE... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unsigned long long... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking whether the inttypes.h PRIxNN macros are broken... no
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking for shared library run path origin... done
checking argz.h usability... yes
checking argz.h presence... yes
checking for argz.h... yes
checking limits.h usability... yes
checking limits.h presence... yes
checking for limits.h... yes
checking locale.h usability... yes
checking locale.h presence... yes
checking for locale.h... yes
checking nl_types.h usability... yes
checking nl_types.h presence... yes
checking for nl_types.h... yes
checking malloc.h usability... yes
checking malloc.h presence... yes
checking for malloc.h... yes
checking stddef.h usability... yes
checking stddef.h presence... yes
checking for stddef.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
checking for string.h...
