Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-30 Thread Pena Family

I know the feeling. If an OT gets started and followed by a very passionate
thread, I feel like I read the last page of murder mystery and have to go
back to the beginning to find out what is going on.

--
"Don't shoot til you see the white of their
eyes.course, the problem is that the
enemy is behind us."

- Original Message -
From: "Brendan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]


>
> >And once again Robin is the Knight in Shining Armour out to protect us
> >hapless & helpless females from the dragons of the list-world!  Oh I
> >swoon now in your arms Sir Robin!
> >
> >Femme
>
> Sounds like there's some sort of history here...
> I must have missed all of the banter. I tend to delete most of the list,
> but I'm slowly catching up...There's just so much to get through...
>
> B
>
>
>






> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-30 Thread Brendan


>And once again Robin is the Knight in Shining Armour out to protect us
>hapless & helpless females from the dragons of the list-world!  Oh I
>swoon now in your arms Sir Robin!
>
>Femme

Sounds like there's some sort of history here...
I must have missed all of the banter. I tend to delete most of the list, 
but I'm slowly catching up...There's just so much to get through...

B




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[OT] was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-27 Thread Frans Ketelaars

On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:40:16 -0500
sda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 

> Over time they've
> remarked when investigating cybercrime, specifically older men caught
> seducing young girls online, that often these men thought they were
> talking to women considerably older. These seem policemen mentioned
> that one of the problems they have to deal with is that women often chat
> like young teenage girls online - vis-a-vis some of the exchanges I've
> seen on this list with unowho. I just wish to put an end to some of this
> nonsense, women shouldn't flirt with strange men in real life, so why
> should it be considered proper in an online forum, especially one like
> this one? Something I hope you fellas consider before thinking you're
> defending a damsel in distress. Methinks she has probably a few issues
> to deal with and finding them here is NOT appropriate.

"women shouldn't flirt with strange men in real life" you say? You mean
it's OK for men to flirt with strange women (or men :) ) , and with 'strange'
you mean what?? Ever heard of 'human rights' ;)

> > I'll tell you this though; if this list was a party or a get together
> > and we were all together in person, I know for a fact that you would not
> > have been as "courageous" as you've been below with your female target. 
> > You may be an asshole, but you're not stupid.
> 
> No I'm not stupid and but I realize you like to jump to conclusions -
> whatever floats yer boat. Swim on.

-Frans

Btw, I just read Dennis.R.Myers's post, I agree ;)



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-27 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!







-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sda
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!



On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:53:48AM -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> 
> Alrighty.
> 
> A wise man once told me that griping the griper was unproductive.  To
> that wise man, I now offer my apologies, and the offering that this
> exchange is in no way an attempt to disrespect his advice.


Obviously you don't listen then...


> I've been taking note of this exchange for some time now, and since I
> feel like I've pretty well grokked it, I'm going to lay down my wooden
> nickel's worth.  Since it's a free country and a list-of-liberty and
> all.


Oh I bet you have - since I dusted you last time, want to take a poke
now eh?


> My first observation is that, Steve, you're an asshole. You love to
> wallow in your own mental feces.  I don't know what your personal
> problems are, but this list and the female members are not your
> psychologic dumping ground.


Hey I might be an asshole, but I'm not a stupid one like you appear to
come across as...


> Now if you've got something like this to say to any female on the list,
> ( "being as concerned about bandwidth as you are" )my second observation
> is that you have the option to go private.  You did not do this.  Now
> where I come from, if you walk up to somebody's girlfriend or wife and
> say something like what you've said below to them, you end up with a
> black eye and checking out the taste of the local dirt.  But of course
> you're not going to go private with shit like you've said below, are
> you?  Because your true aim is not to correct what you propagandize as
> "OT's" or "bandwidth transgressions."  Your true aim is to hurt and
> embarrass Femme to maximum effect; everything else is just a shield or
> an excuse.  Lack of a private exchange is irrefutable evidence, since a
> private exchange in your case would have been setting an example for
> "OT's" or "bandwidth transgressions."


No some things need to be said, and I've received quite a bit of
encouragement from others on this list who found many of her posts
inappropriate for a technical forum. I just don't care for the "cutesy"
aspect of a young woman flirting on an adult list. I have several friends 
in law enforcement and one with the "horsemen" [RCMP]. Over time they've
remarked when investigating cybercrime, specifically older men caught
seducing young girls online, that often these men thought they were
talking to women considerably older. These seem policemen mentioned
that one of the problems they have to deal with is that women often chat
like young teenage girls online - vis-a-vis some of the exchanges I've
seen on this list with unowho. I just wish to put an end to some of this
nonsense, women shouldn't flirt with strange men in real life, so why
should it be considered proper in an online forum, especially one like
this one? Something I hope you fellas consider before thinking you're
defending a damsel in distress. Methinks she has probably a few issues
to deal with and finding them here is NOT appropriate.


> I'll tell you this though; if this list was a party or a get together
> and we were all together in person, I know for a fact that you would not
> have been as "courageous" as you've been below with your female target. 
> You may be an asshole, but you're not stupid.


No I'm not stupid and but I realize you like to jump to conclusions -
whatever floats yer boat. Swim on.


-- 
    -^-   -^-
           Steve
        ^
       ___   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                  >
      '   `
I would suggest that it is time to let this thread die. There are enough other things to address than this type of thing. If you don't like the way some one posts or participates put a filter on. Length of time on the list has little to do with how a post is made. I have been on the list for about 2years now, I find that it is community and that for the most part it is made up of people trying to help others or looking for help. I've been both and I don,t mind adding a little humor to my posts (some might say "very little humor").  Tongue in cheek is ok too. So folks let's just let it lay for now. Thanks.

Dennis M.


                     





Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-27 Thread daRcmaTTeR

> Femme Fatale has helped me with a couple problems, and I've enjoyed
> reading her posts. In fact, I usually just delete posts that have
subjects
> that don't interest me, but a couple times I've checked in because I
saw
> Femme had replied. Once or twice, that's led to me helping someone
that I
> wouldn't have otherwise.
>
> I find in each of the groups and lists I frequent, you get people who
just
> have to try to quash any posts that aren't 100% on topic, especially
if
> the off topic bit is fun (interestingly, they always - *always* -
claim
> to get emailed support off-list).

Rog,

those are called "list nazis".  ;)




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-27 Thread Lyvim Xaphir


Alrighty.

A wise man once told me that griping the griper was unproductive.  To
that wise man, I now offer my apologies, and the offering that this
exchange is in no way an attempt to disrespect his advice.

I've been taking note of this exchange for some time now, and since I
feel like I've pretty well grokked it, I'm going to lay down my wooden
nickel's worth.  Since it's a free country and a list-of-liberty and
all.

My first observation is that, Steve, you're an asshole. You love to
wallow in your own mental feces.  I don't know what your personal
problems are, but this list and the female members are not your
psychologic dumping ground.

Now if you've got something like this to say to any female on the list,
( "being as concerned about bandwidth as you are" )my second observation
is that you have the option to go private.  You did not do this.  Now
where I come from, if you walk up to somebody's girlfriend or wife and
say something like what you've said below to them, you end up with a
black eye and checking out the taste of the local dirt.  But of course
you're not going to go private with shit like you've said below, are
you?  Because your true aim is not to correct what you propagandize as
"OT's" or "bandwidth transgressions."  Your true aim is to hurt and
embarrass Femme to maximum effect; everything else is just a shield or
an excuse.  Lack of a private exchange is irrefutable evidence, since a
private exchange in your case would have been setting an example for
"OT's" or "bandwidth transgressions."

I'll tell you this though; if this list was a party or a get together
and we were all together in person, I know for a fact that you would not
have been as "courageous" as you've been below with your female target. 
You may be an asshole, but you're not stupid.


> > On Sun, 2002-03-24 at 20:48, sda wrote:

> > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 05:20:15PM -0700, FemmeFatale wrote:
> > > > We're rough... to idiots. :)

> > > For someone who's actually been only posting on this list for what three
> > > weeks tops? - You seem to have an awful lot to say about things around
> > > here. Now I'm sure you're cutsy 14 yo girlish antics get you somewhere
> > > with most of the boys, I'm not too impressed. Care to tone it down a
> > > bit, or is this list your flavour of the month?

> > > I notice you've now started posting on the "expert" list - I'm sure
> > > you're a "sunny" personality and all, but why do most women on the
> > > internet have to chatter like 14 yo girls? You do realize that's what
> > > you sound like right? I ran several of your posts by several of my
> > > friends that are relatively sophisticated urbanite women early 30ish -
> > > they agreed.

> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:50:01PM +0200, Robin Turner wrote:
> > [snippets]

> > > I just cant get over everyone calling Femme a 14 yr old girl.

> > Not everyone, by a long chalk.

On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 11:32, sda wrote: 
> Oh please, it's quite obvious by some of her comments, that she was
> "acting" as such. I didn't say she was one and since this list is for
> newbies to acquire some techinical information, lets keep the "side
> chatter" or socializing ratio down please. I've been receving quite a
> few private e-mails in support, much more than here in support of
> keeping the "noise" ratio high.


> > So it's OK to be provocative, condescending, dogmatic or pedantic 
> > (not referring to anyone in particular) but being cute or girlish is
> > out?  I detect a double standard here.  I'd guess that if Femme 
> > Fatale had picked a different nickname, like, say SegFault, 
> > no one would have picked up on the girly thing.
 
> Oh contraire, she sounds as she sounds and this list is detoriating to
> more noise once again. The problem is when the noise ratio exceeds the
> actual help ratio, and with this nonsense carrying on I can see it
> happening with ease. If you folks want to chat socially, I suggest you
> all grab IRC and go to the Mandrake or what-ever-channel. This is not
> the place, for the cutesy folksy noise that seems to prevade here, 
> more recently since uno-who joined.
> 
> Anyway carry-on I won't respond any more to this or similar threads.
> Will watch and see what happens. The sad thing will be if those that
> have the knowledge refuse to share it because of the noise ratio.
> Civilme can't do it all alone.



-- 
°°°
Kernel  2.4.8-26mdk Mandrake Linux  8.1
Enlightenment 0.16.5Evolution  1.02
Registered Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/
°°°


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-26 Thread mooseman

On March 24, 2002 09:21 pm, you wrote:
> On Sunday 24 March 2002 09:28 pm, you wrote:
> > *shrugs* Whatever guy.
> >
> > Ya i'll tone it down just was excited & having fun
> >
> > in the event you still don't like my posts, don't read em.
> >
> > I'm just enjoying myself & if I sound 14, oh well...Sorry that bugs you.
> >
> > Femme
>
> Well, I've noticed that you respond to just about every thread there is,
> and many many times you say, "well, I can't help" or "I don't know, but"
> what is the weather like in Australia or something equally as relevant; and
> I wonder, 'why is she even posting then'.   Or you butt in and ask what is
> something that you would be better off googling about.  You have been
> getting on my nerves too.  You act like this is the femmelist or something.
>  And yeah, I too was shocked to see a professed newbie - who can't really
> help - posting on the expert list.  I realize you're all proud of yourself
> and all getting linux up and running - but who the hell can't get mandrake
> 8.x going?  We're not impressed with you.
> -s

speak for yourself.
i find it refreshing to have someone enthusiastic posting whether things are 
going good or bad. 

glad to know that you are enjoying the community spirit. 8^P

moose.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-26 Thread FemmeFatale

Brian Parish wrote:
> 
> OK! Yeah!  There you go Femme.  Make it Segfault Fatale  (or maybe Fatal
> Segfault?) you'll be set like a jelly!  Or is the jello to you northern
> types?
> 
> Sorry - the OT police will be after me now.
> 
> Brian
> 
> On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 23:50, Robin Turner wrote:
> > So it's OK to be provocative, condescending, dogmatic or pedantic
> > (not referring to anyone in particular) but being cute or girlish is
> > out?  I detect a double standard here.  I'd guess that if Femme
> > Fatale had picked a different nickname, like, say SegFault,
> > no one would have picked up on the girly thing.
> 

*smiles* Yes thats an idea Brian!  I just may do that to piss someone
off later ;p

Yes its jello... though i've been known to call other girls "gels" or
use the word to describe jello ;p

Femme
-- 
Good Decisions You boss Made:

"We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux.  I've always liked that
character
from Peanuts."

- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-26 Thread FemmeFatale

Robin Turner wrote:
> 
> [snippets]
> 
> > I just cant get over everyone calling Femme a 14 yr old girl.
> 
> Not everyone, by a long chalk.
> 
> > > things around here. Now I'm sure you're cutsy 14 yo girlish
> > > antics get you somewhere with most of the boys, I'm not too
> > > impressed. Care to tone it down a bit, or is this list your
> > > flavour of the month?
> 
> So it's OK to be provocative, condescending, dogmatic or pedantic
> (not referring to anyone in particular) but being cute or girlish is
> out?  I detect a double standard here.  I'd guess that if Femme
> Fatale had picked a different nickname, like, say SegFault,
> no one would have picked up on the girly thing.
> 
> Robin
> 
> --
>

And once again Robin is the Knight in Shining Armour out to protect us
hapless & helpless females from the dragons of the list-world!  Oh I
swoon now in your arms Sir Robin!

Femme

-- 
Good Decisions You boss Made:

"We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux.  I've always liked that
character
from Peanuts."

- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-26 Thread s

On Tuesday 26 March 2002 10:32 am, you wrote:

>
> Oh contraire, she sounds as she sounds and this list is detoriating to
> more noise once again. The problem is when the noise ratio exceeds the
> actual help ratio, and with this nonsense carrying on I can see it
> happening with ease. If you folks want to chat socially, I suggest you
> all grab IRC and go to the Mandrake or what-ever-channel. This is not
> the place, for the cutesy folksy noise that seems to prevade here, more
> recently since uno-who joined.
>
> Anyway carry-on I won't respond any more to this or similar threads.
> Will watch and see what happens. The sad thing will be if those that
> have the knowledge refuse to share it because of the noise ratio.
> Civilme can't do it all alone.

Thank you!
-s



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-26 Thread civileme

Brian Parish wrote:

>OK! Yeah!  There you go Femme.  Make it Segfault Fatale  (or maybe Fatal
>Segfault?) you'll be set like a jelly!  Or is the jello to you northern
>types?
>
>Sorry - the OT police will be after me now.
>
>Brian
>
>On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 23:50, Robin Turner wrote:
>
>>So it's OK to be provocative, condescending, dogmatic or pedantic 
>>(not referring to anyone in particular) but being cute or girlish is 
>>out?  I detect a double standard here.  I'd guess that if Femme 
>>Fatale had picked a different nickname, like, say SegFault, 
>>no one would have picked up on the girly thing.
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>
Ummm, folks, the name should not have implied cutesy or 14yo at all and 
certainly not girlish.  kdict says:





femme fatale
 n : a woman who is considered to be dangerously seductive [syn:
 enchantress, temptress, siren, Delilah]

Civileme





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-26 Thread cervix couch



>From: sda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

>Oh contraire, she sounds as she sounds and this list is detoriating to
>more noise once again. The problem is when the noise ratio exceeds the
>actual help ratio, and with this nonsense carrying on I can see it
>happening with ease. If you folks want to chat socially, I suggest you
>all grab IRC and go to the Mandrake or what-ever-channel. 




"Dude", why don't you just chill out?!?!?


>This is not
>the place, for the cutesy folksy noise that seems to prevade here, more
>recently since uno-who joined.
>



Compared to some other lists I'm on, this list is hardly "noisy", but when there's 
this much traffic, it does make a good case for offering a digest form of this list 
(hint hint)


>Anyway carry-on I won't respond any more to this or similar threads.


Good! 

--
Register Chinese Character Domain Name- ONLY US$17/year!
100 Chinese Domain Names are registered every minute!
Time is clicking, what are you waiting for?
Go to  http://www.chinese-dns.com  Register NOW!!!

Verisign¤¤¤å³»¯Å°ì¦W²{¦b¼ö½æ¤¤¡T
¨C¤ÀÄÁ³£¦³100­Ó¤¤¤å°ì¦W³Qµù¥U¡M±zÁÙ¦bµ¥¤°»ò©O¡S
¨C­Óºô§}¬üª÷17¤¸/¦~¡T²{¦b´N¨ì http://www.chinese-dns.com  µù¥U¡T




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[OT] Posting style [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-26 Thread Robin Turner

[snippets]

> I just cant get over everyone calling Femme a 14 yr old girl.

Not everyone, by a long chalk.

> > things around here. Now I'm sure you're cutsy 14 yo girlish
> > antics get you somewhere with most of the boys, I'm not too
> > impressed. Care to tone it down a bit, or is this list your
> > flavour of the month?

So it's OK to be provocative, condescending, dogmatic or pedantic 
(not referring to anyone in particular) but being cute or girlish is 
out?  I detect a double standard here.  I'd guess that if Femme 
Fatale had picked a different nickname, like, say SegFault, 
no one would have picked up on the girly thing.

Robin


-- 
"Bravo Epictetus!" - Epictetus

Robin Turner
IDMYO, Bilkent Universitesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey

http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-26 Thread John Lynch

I just cant get over everyone calling Femme a 14 yr old girl.

Well, I talk to A LOT of 60 yr old men AND women, and i'd say she resembles 
them more then 14 yr old girls.

>From: sda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!
>Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:48:05 -0500
>
>On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 05:20:15PM -0700, FemmeFatale wrote:
> > We're rough... to idiots. :)
>
>For someone who's actually been only posting on this list for what three
>weeks tops? - You seem to have an awful lot to say about things around
>here. Now I'm sure you're cutsy 14 yo girlish antics get you somewhere
>with most of the boys, I'm not too impressed. Care to tone it down a
>bit, or is this list your flavour of the month?
>
>I notice you've now started posting on the "expert" list - I'm sure
>you're a "sunny" personality and all, but why do most women on the
>internet have to chatter like 14 yo girls? You do realize that's what
>you sound like right? I ran several of your posts by several of my
>friends that are relatively sophisticated urbanite women early 30ish -
>they agreed.
>
>
>--
>   -^-   -^-
>  Steve
>   ^
>  ___   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  >
> '   `
>
>
>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-25 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

On Sun, 2002-03-24 at 22:28, FemmeFatale wrote: 
> *shrugs* Whatever guy.
> 
> Ya i'll tone it down just was excited & having fun
> 
> in the event you still don't like my posts, don't read em.
> 
> I'm just enjoying myself & if I sound 14, oh well...Sorry that bugs you.
> 
> Femme
 
As far as I'm concerned, your conduct has been exemplary.  You've been a
tremendous help to many here, not only technically, but also a strong
source of moral support.  If anything, you've strengthened the list, and
I don't see that as desirable to anybody who's seeking to put a damper
on list enthusiasm.  Personally I tend to expect a little more from
people than dry technical details; I also look for a caring and
supportive attitude.  If there's anyone on this list that has supplied
both, it's certainly you first and foremost.  So my suggestion is that
you continue to conduct yourself as you have in the past, which to me
has left a positive and very adult impression.  In other words, don't
let anybody else stop you from being who you are.

Best Regards Always,

Lyvim


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-25 Thread John Lynch

Here Here.

I agree with Brian 110%!

Femme was BOTH helpful and amusing for me.

When I was yelling at my computer cause it was being screwy on me cause I 
didn't understand something, and I'd be pissed and I would try to sound 
neutral in my e-mails. It was Femme's replies that helped with my computer 
problem, but also brightened up my day CONSIDERABLY with her humour.

and Femme, if u dare stop I'm going to have to go to WHEREVER you live and 
give you a stern talking too.

and Femme sounds like she's 14?
I .errrkinda pinned her as being older.

*shuts up cause he doesn't want to say Femme is older then she really is*

John.

(as a summary, computer help is just as helpful as humour and calming people 
down.)


>From: Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!
>Date: 25 Mar 2002 21:13:35 +1100
>
>Well I can't help thinking that's a bit unfair.  Let's not undertake a
>Heather hunt here.  Femme to my memory has been both frivolous and
>genuinely helpful in about equal measure.  That's not a bad hit rate
>when the frivolous postings are short and sweet.
>
>My 2c - that's Australian cents so worth about nothing - keep posting,
>but maybe think twice so the less tolerant, highly focused individuals
>among us don't get all twisted and bitter.  I don't think there is a
>anyone more genuinely committed to LM and more willing to help, so it
>would be a shame to lose you.
>
>Brian
>
>On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 16:44, FemmeFatale wrote:
> > Fine.  I'll just lurk & shut my mouth
> >
> > End of story
> >
> > Femme
> >
> > s wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday 24 March 2002 09:28 pm, you wrote:
> > > > *shrugs* Whatever guy.
> > > >
> > > > Ya i'll tone it down just was excited & having fun
> > > >
> > > > in the event you still don't like my posts, don't read em.
> > > >
> > > > I'm just enjoying myself & if I sound 14, oh well...Sorry that bugs 
>you.
> > > >
> > > > Femme
> > >
> > > Well, I've noticed that you respond to just about every thread there 
>is, and
> > > many many times you say, "well, I can't help" or "I don't know, but" 
>what is
> > > the weather like in Australia or something equally as relevant; and I 
>wonder,
> > > 'why is she even posting then'.   Or you butt in and ask what is 
>something
> > > that you would be better off googling about.  You have been getting on 
>my
> > > nerves too.  You act like this is the femmelist or something.  And 
>yeah, I
> > > too was shocked to see a professed newbie - who can't really help - 
>posting
> > > on the expert list.  I realize you're all proud of yourself and all 
>getting
> > > linux up and running - but who the hell can't get mandrake 8.x going?  
>We're
> > > not impressed with you.
> > > -s
> > >
> > >   
>
> > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> > > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> >
> > 
> >
>
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>
>
>
>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-25 Thread Brian Parish

Well I can't help thinking that's a bit unfair.  Let's not undertake a
Heather hunt here.  Femme to my memory has been both frivolous and
genuinely helpful in about equal measure.  That's not a bad hit rate
when the frivolous postings are short and sweet.

My 2c - that's Australian cents so worth about nothing - keep posting,
but maybe think twice so the less tolerant, highly focused individuals
among us don't get all twisted and bitter.  I don't think there is a
anyone more genuinely committed to LM and more willing to help, so it
would be a shame to lose you.

Brian
 
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 16:44, FemmeFatale wrote:
> Fine.  I'll just lurk & shut my mouth
> 
> End of story
> 
> Femme
> 
> s wrote:
> > 
> > On Sunday 24 March 2002 09:28 pm, you wrote:
> > > *shrugs* Whatever guy.
> > >
> > > Ya i'll tone it down just was excited & having fun
> > >
> > > in the event you still don't like my posts, don't read em.
> > >
> > > I'm just enjoying myself & if I sound 14, oh well...Sorry that bugs you.
> > >
> > > Femme
> > 
> > Well, I've noticed that you respond to just about every thread there is, and
> > many many times you say, "well, I can't help" or "I don't know, but" what is
> > the weather like in Australia or something equally as relevant; and I wonder,
> > 'why is she even posting then'.   Or you butt in and ask what is something
> > that you would be better off googling about.  You have been getting on my
> > nerves too.  You act like this is the femmelist or something.  And yeah, I
> > too was shocked to see a professed newbie - who can't really help - posting
> > on the expert list.  I realize you're all proud of yourself and all getting
> > linux up and running - but who the hell can't get mandrake 8.x going?  We're
> > not impressed with you.
> > -s
> > 
> >   
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> 
> 
> 

> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-24 Thread FemmeFatale

Fine.  I'll just lurk & shut my mouth

End of story

Femme

s wrote:
> 
> On Sunday 24 March 2002 09:28 pm, you wrote:
> > *shrugs* Whatever guy.
> >
> > Ya i'll tone it down just was excited & having fun
> >
> > in the event you still don't like my posts, don't read em.
> >
> > I'm just enjoying myself & if I sound 14, oh well...Sorry that bugs you.
> >
> > Femme
> 
> Well, I've noticed that you respond to just about every thread there is, and
> many many times you say, "well, I can't help" or "I don't know, but" what is
> the weather like in Australia or something equally as relevant; and I wonder,
> 'why is she even posting then'.   Or you butt in and ask what is something
> that you would be better off googling about.  You have been getting on my
> nerves too.  You act like this is the femmelist or something.  And yeah, I
> too was shocked to see a professed newbie - who can't really help - posting
> on the expert list.  I realize you're all proud of yourself and all getting
> linux up and running - but who the hell can't get mandrake 8.x going?  We're
> not impressed with you.
> -s
> 
>   
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-24 Thread s

On Sunday 24 March 2002 09:28 pm, you wrote:
> *shrugs* Whatever guy.
>
> Ya i'll tone it down just was excited & having fun
>
> in the event you still don't like my posts, don't read em.
>
> I'm just enjoying myself & if I sound 14, oh well...Sorry that bugs you.
>
> Femme

Well, I've noticed that you respond to just about every thread there is, and 
many many times you say, "well, I can't help" or "I don't know, but" what is 
the weather like in Australia or something equally as relevant; and I wonder, 
'why is she even posting then'.   Or you butt in and ask what is something 
that you would be better off googling about.  You have been getting on my 
nerves too.  You act like this is the femmelist or something.  And yeah, I 
too was shocked to see a professed newbie - who can't really help - posting 
on the expert list.  I realize you're all proud of yourself and all getting 
linux up and running - but who the hell can't get mandrake 8.x going?  We're 
not impressed with you.
-s




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-24 Thread FemmeFatale

We're rough... to idiots. :)

Webster won't agree with me on the definition of idiot but:

Idiot:
(noun) person who won't help themselves; to whit, someone who whines &
bitches about said software but refuses to help himself with it & find a
solution.
(verb) usage of the word Idiot with regards to said Noun(s).
(adverb) used to describe the behaviour of the above Noun(s).
(adjective) description of the Noun above. 

:)

HTH!
Femme

"Donald Everett Gulmire, Jr." wrote:
> 
> I just installed the "new and improved" Mandrake 8.2.  It was harder to get
> my DSL up than with the 8.1.  I've only been running Linux for about three
> weeks.  I like the CDRom icons, but there is one problem.  My Floppy, and my
> two CDRoms are locked.  Even to super user.  I thought it was a permission
> problem, but I can't get in.  What should I do.  By the way, thanks for
> answering my questions without flaming the heck out of me.  I guess I'm used
> to some ruff newsgroups.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Don
> 
>   
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: Why upgrade? [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-24 Thread Lee

On Sunday 24 March 2002 10:51 am, Robin Turner wrote:
> On Sunday 24 March 2002 17:34, Tim Holmes wrote:
> > But now I have a question.  Why did you upgrade to 8.2?  If 8.1 was
> > working, and you weren't having any problems, why did you upgrade
> > to 8.2?
> >
> > It seems a lot of people think that as soon a new revision comes
> > out, they have to upgrade to the new rev.  That's not the case.  In
> > previous revs that was needed.  There was a good sized jump in
> > kernel capabilities and hardware additions from 7.2 to 8.0. So
> > there was a need to upgrade there.  But from 8.1, to 8.2, I don't
> > believe there is.
> >
> > I've noticed, more so this time then with the last two Mandrake
> > revs, that people are upgrading merely because there's a new
> > version.  Micro$HAFT has conditioned people to think that a new
> > version is out, and you have to upgrade.  This is not the case with
> > Linux.
> >
> > If you keep your apps and patches up to date, there's no need to
> > upgrade.  There are still people on the list that run on Mandrake
> > 7.2.  In my opinion it's still the most stable of Mandrake's
> > releases.  If you upgrade the kernel and apply safty patches and
> > the like, there's still no need to upgrade.  At the time I only
> > went to 8.0 because of better hardware support.
>
> Point taken (and I agree that 7.2 was a damn fine distro).  Of
> course, if you take the trouble to upgrade your apps (and the
> necessary libraries) and choose the best kernel for them (not always
> the latest!) then you have no pressing reason to upgrade. OTOH, once
> you do that, you are in effect creating your own Linux system anyway.
>  I usually upgrade my most-used apps to the point that I start
> getting serious conflicts, then upgrade the whole distro.  It's just
> easier that way.  I'd rather spend an hour upgrading my whole system
> than spend weeks tinkering with it.
>
> As for the analogy with Microsoft upgrades, I think if there's one
> thing MS taught me, it was _not_ to upgrade!  Apart from my Linux
> box, the machines in my office run MS Office 97 on Win 98SE, except
> for one which is still on Win95 (in fact the upgrades to 98SE weren't
> my idea - they came when we had a hardware upgrade).
>
> Robin

-- 
Sport.Some play football..some upgrade

8.2 seems faster on my box, but my car runs better after a wash, too

Lee
Registered Linux abuser #223705



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Why upgrade? [was: Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!]

2002-03-24 Thread Robin Turner

On Sunday 24 March 2002 17:34, Tim Holmes wrote:

> But now I have a question.  Why did you upgrade to 8.2?  If 8.1 was
> working, and you weren't having any problems, why did you upgrade
> to 8.2?
>
> It seems a lot of people think that as soon a new revision comes
> out, they have to upgrade to the new rev.  That's not the case.  In
> previous revs that was needed.  There was a good sized jump in
> kernel capabilities and hardware additions from 7.2 to 8.0. So
> there was a need to upgrade there.  But from 8.1, to 8.2, I don't
> believe there is.
>
> I've noticed, more so this time then with the last two Mandrake
> revs, that people are upgrading merely because there's a new
> version.  Micro$HAFT has conditioned people to think that a new
> version is out, and you have to upgrade.  This is not the case with
> Linux.
>
> If you keep your apps and patches up to date, there's no need to
> upgrade.  There are still people on the list that run on Mandrake
> 7.2.  In my opinion it's still the most stable of Mandrake's
> releases.  If you upgrade the kernel and apply safty patches and
> the like, there's still no need to upgrade.  At the time I only
> went to 8.0 because of better hardware support.

Point taken (and I agree that 7.2 was a damn fine distro).  Of 
course, if you take the trouble to upgrade your apps (and the 
necessary libraries) and choose the best kernel for them (not always 
the latest!) then you have no pressing reason to upgrade. OTOH, once 
you do that, you are in effect creating your own Linux system anyway. 
 I usually upgrade my most-used apps to the point that I start 
getting serious conflicts, then upgrade the whole distro.  It's just 
easier that way.  I'd rather spend an hour upgrading my whole system 
than spend weeks tinkering with it.

As for the analogy with Microsoft upgrades, I think if there's one 
thing MS taught me, it was _not_ to upgrade!  Apart from my Linux 
box, the machines in my office run MS Office 97 on Win 98SE, except 
for one which is still on Win95 (in fact the upgrades to 98SE weren't 
my idea - they came when we had a hardware upgrade).

Robin



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-24 Thread Tim Holmes

Did you try to unmount the devices?

Make sure you're not currently accessing something on either one, then run
the commands:

umount /mnt/floppy
eject

That should unmount the floppy so you can eject it manually.  The eject command
will unmount the CD, if it was mounted, before it ejects it.

>From there, put the floppy back in, and run the command:

mount /mnt/floppy

Then try to access the contents of the floppy.

Similar steps with the CD-ROM.  Insert the CD:

mount /mnt/cdrom
cd /mnt/cdrom
ls -a 

I'm not sure how the automount works in 8.2.  It may need to be tweaked a bit.

But now I have a question.  Why did you upgrade to 8.2?  If 8.1 was working,
and you weren't having any problems, why did you upgrade to 8.2?

It seems a lot of people think that as soon a new revision comes out, they have
to upgrade to the new rev.  That's not the case.  In previous revs that was 
needed.  There was a good sized jump in kernel capabilities and hardware additions
from 7.2 to 8.0. So there was a need to upgrade there.  But from 8.1, to 8.2, I
don't believe there is.

I've noticed, more so this time then with the last two Mandrake revs, that people
are upgrading merely because there's a new version.  Micro$HAFT has conditioned
people to think that a new version is out, and you have to upgrade.  This is not
the case with Linux.

If you keep your apps and patches up to date, there's no need to upgrade.  There
are still people on the list that run on Mandrake 7.2.  In my opinion it's still
the most stable of Mandrake's releases.  If you upgrade the kernel and apply safty
patches and the like, there's still no need to upgrade.  At the time I only went
to 8.0 because of better hardware support.

Hope my suggestions helped.
tdh

--
  
  T. Holmes  |  UNIXTECHS.org  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  UIN:  17021091
  
| I just installed the "new and improved" Mandrake 8.2.  It was harder to get 
| my DSL up than with the 8.1.  I've only been running Linux for about three 
| weeks.  I like the CDRom icons, but there is one problem.  My Floppy, and my 
| two CDRoms are locked.  Even to super user.  I thought it was a permission 
| problem, but I can't get in.  What should I do.  By the way, thanks for 
| answering my questions without flaming the heck out of me.  I guess I'm used 
| to some ruff newsgroups.
| 
| Thanks,
| 
| Don
| 
| Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
| Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
`--- 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-24 Thread Robin Turner

On Sunday 24 March 2002 16:35, Donald Everett Gulmire, Jr. wrote:
> I just installed the "new and improved" Mandrake 8.2.  It was
> harder to get my DSL up than with the 8.1.  I've only been running
> Linux for about three weeks.  I like the CDRom icons, but there is
> one problem.  My Floppy, and my two CDRoms are locked.  Even to
> super user.  I thought it was a permission problem, but I can't get
> in.  What should I do.  By the way, thanks for answering my
> questions without flaming the heck out of me.  I guess I'm used to
> some ruff newsgroups.

We're a bunch of kittens here ;-)

Check /etc/fstab

For your floppy you should have a line something like

/mnt/floppy /mnt/floppy supermount dev=/dev/fd0,fs=vfat,exec,--,user 
0 0

(that should all be one line, BTW)

Note that's only a suggestion - things may be different in 8.2.

Alternatively, open the Mandrake Control Centre, click Hardware -> 
Mount Points -> Removable Media -> Options and check you have "user" 
and "supermount" checked.  If that doesn't work, disable supermount 
and see if you can mount it manually.

Robin



Edit as necessary.
-- 
"Bravo Epictetus!" - Epictetus

Robin Turner
IDMYO, Bilkent Universitesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey

http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] I'm Locked Out!

2002-03-24 Thread Donald Everett Gulmire, Jr.

I just installed the "new and improved" Mandrake 8.2.  It was harder to get 
my DSL up than with the 8.1.  I've only been running Linux for about three 
weeks.  I like the CDRom icons, but there is one problem.  My Floppy, and my 
two CDRoms are locked.  Even to super user.  I thought it was a permission 
problem, but I can't get in.  What should I do.  By the way, thanks for 
answering my questions without flaming the heck out of me.  I guess I'm used 
to some ruff newsgroups.

Thanks,

Don



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com