subject:"\[newbie\] Kernel"

Re: [newbie] kernel with support for sata raid

2005-04-06 Thread Derek Jennings

On Wednesday 06 April 2005 11:49, Isak Lyberth wrote:
> i have a Fujitsu-siemens server (primergy Econel 50) with a Intel
> fw82801fr chipset, that supports some raid settings.
> I have seen on a debian install that it worked with a 3ware driver, but
> couldn't get it to work with this on mandrake.
> Is there a mandrake linux kernel that i can download with support for
> this chipset?
>
> regards Isak

Do you mean the 3w-9xxx driver?
It is in the standard 2.6.8-12mdk kernel for Mandrake 10.1
If it is not loading try putting
3x-9xxx in the file /etc/modprobe.preload

Or perhaps you could try the 3w- driver. That is in the kernel too.

derek
-- 
www.jennings.homelinux.net
http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel 2.6.11 upgrade.

2005-03-18 Thread Tom

JR wrote:
On Thursday 17 March 2005 07:59 pm, Tom wrote:
OTOH, you didn't say if you need a SMP (more than one
processor), a Hi-Mem (1 gig of ram or more), or any other special
requirements.

Tom,
Thanks a lot. I have a fairly standard laptop setup, so I think the standard
kernel you linked will be fine.
Well, I had thought I implied that your chances of success with
a 2.6.11 kernel on older Mandrake versions were questionable. That
it would be better to wait a bit an install 10.2 if you need a
2.6.11 kernel. OTOH, if you install the kernel with -ivh, it will go
in along side your current kernel, which you then can always fall
back to if the new kernel fails.

Laptop, adds in another question mark. Many reports on cooker
that 2.6.11 fails on some laptops. Mostly an i686/i586 issue. The
only work around right now AFAIK is to try the i586 specific kernel.
(I've never had a laptop)

ftp://ftp.proxad.net/pub/Distributions_Linux/Mandrake/devel/cooker/i586/media/main/kernel-i586-up-1GB-2.6.11.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
In explanation; while Mandrake is still primarily an i586
architecture distro, many things like glibc and the 'normal' kernel
are compiled for 1686 to take advantage of that optimization and 686
specific cpu flags. Many laptop, C(yrix)-3 processors, and some
others are not true i686 systems. C-3's aren't even true i586. The
10.2 installer has been modified to blacklist these systems an
install the i586 kernel. 'Course if you install a 10.2 kernel on an
older Mdk version, this protection is not afforded.

Type 'arch' in a console and press , it'll probly
return 'i686'. That only means that the cpu/cache reports itself as
686 architecture the system might not really be i686.
--
Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel 2.6.11 upgrade.

2005-03-18 Thread JR

After installing the mandrake package for kernel 2.6.11, the only problem 
seems to be the network. I get this error:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] unholy]# service network start
Setting network parameters: [  OK  ]
Bringing up loopback interface: [  OK  ]
Bringing up interface eth1:  driverloader device eth1 does not seem to be 
present, delaying initialization.
[FAILED]


driverloader is a service that loads the drivers for my pcmcia network card. I 
installed it when I was using the old kernel so maybe the new kernel needs to 
be made aware of it's presence. But I dont know how to do that.

Thanks for listening,

Jarlath



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel 2.6.11 upgrade.

2005-03-18 Thread JR

On Thursday 17 March 2005 07:59 pm, Tom wrote:
> OTOH, you didn't say if you need a SMP (more than one
> processor), a Hi-Mem (1 gig of ram or more), or any other special
> requirements.
 

Tom,

Thanks a lot. I have a fairly standard laptop setup, so I think the standard 
kernel you linked will be fine.
> Holler back if you want to compile, it's really fairly simple.
If it goes belly up, I will take you up on your offer!

Thanks again,

Jarlath


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel 2.6.11 upgrade.

2005-03-17 Thread Tom

JR wrote:
If a new kernel is out in a repository (official or
unofficial) you can install through urpmi or anyway

Could anyone tell me where I can find such a repository? I've followed the
kernel upgrade / install instructions at
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/UsingUrpmi#Installing_a_new_kernel
but the 'updates' repository doesnt have anything newer than 2.6.8. I'd like
2.6.10 / 2.6.11

Cheers,
Ja
You could get 2.6.11-2mdk from
ftp://ftp.proxad.net/pub/Distributions_Linux/Mandrake/devel/cooker/i586/media/main/kernel-2.6.11.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
(18MB)
You must install it with (as root, in a console, in the
directory the kernel rpm is in) 'rpm -ivh kern (just hit the
key to auto-complete the rest of the package name). The important
bit being to _i_nstall (-ivh), rather than U_pgrade (-Uvh) the
kernel. Since it's cooker, if there's any problem, you can always
just re-boot an run your existing kernel.

OTOH, you didn't say if you need a SMP (more than one
processor), a Hi-Mem (1 gig of ram or more), or any other special
requirements. In any of those cases, or if you just wanna compile
from source to better ensure the kernel's compatibility with your
older Mandrake version. You'll need the source, install with 'rpm
-Uvh kern
ftp://ftp.proxad.net/pub/Distributions_Linux/Mandrake/devel/cooker/i586/media/main/kernel-source-2.6-2.6.11-2mdk.i586.rpm
(45MB)

Holler back if you want to compile, it's really fairly simple.
OTOH, beware that due to Linus/OSDL security an other enhancements,
the newest kernels will inhibit many actions that now seem
transparent to the user, and require changes in many GUI's (CD
burning for example). Many processes are handled differently, an to
tell the truth, I have no idea what impact that will have using a
2.6.11-mdk on past Mandrake versions.

Sufficiently discouraged? Depends on how adventurous you are ;)
Or you can wait just a bit. Cooker 10.2 RC2 iso's should be
available within a week or so
ftp://ftp.proxad.net/pub/Distributions_Linux/Mandrake/devel/iso/i586
and you could install 10.2 RC2 an keep it upgraded with cooker
media sources until it becomes 10.2 Community. A little longer till
it becomes 10.2 Official.

I would never recommend kernel.org vanilla sources used to
compile a kernel. Specially if you don't know how to patch it about
2 or 300 times to get it equivalent with Mandrake.
--
Tom Brinkman Corpus Christi, Texas

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel 2.6.11 upgrade.

2005-03-17 Thread JR

> > If a new kernel is out in a repository (official or
> > unofficial) you can install through urpmi or anyway

Could anyone tell me where I can find such a repository? I've followed the 
kernel upgrade / install instructions at 
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/UsingUrpmi#Installing_a_new_kernel
but the 'updates' repository doesnt have anything newer than 2.6.8. I'd like 
2.6.10 / 2.6.11

Cheers,
Ja


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel 2.6.11 upgrade.

2005-03-17 Thread Tony

Thanks for the info, urpmi looks cool, will get playing with it straight away.

Tony.

On Thursday 17 March 2005 12:54 am, you wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:00:58 +
>
> Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there an automated process (Mandrake or otherwise) that
> > I can use that  will upgrade my kernel for me, or will I
> > have to do this manually by  compiling the new kernel ?
>
> If a new kernel is out in a repository (official or
> unofficial) you can install through urpmi or anyway the old
> rpm way (rpm -ivh or using a graphical frontend); anyway,
> the new kernel will be added and the old one will still be
> installed unless you decide to do.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel 2.6.11 upgrade.

2005-03-17 Thread SnapafunFrank

Smiley wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:00:58 +
Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 

Is there an automated process (Mandrake or otherwise) that
I can use that  will upgrade my kernel for me, or will I
have to do this manually by  compiling the new kernel ?
   

If a new kernel is out in a repository (official or
unofficial) you can install through urpmi or anyway the old
rpm way (rpm -ivh or using a graphical frontend); anyway,
the new kernel will be added and the old one will still be
installed unless you decide to do.
--
Smiley 

 

And don't forget to include the kernel-source ~ you will need it for the 
driver .

--
Newbie Seeking USER_FUNCTIONALITY always!
Regards
SnapafunFrank
Big or small, a challenge requires the same commitment to resolve.
Registered Linux User # 324213 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel 2.6.11 upgrade.

2005-03-16 Thread Smiley

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:00:58 +
Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Is there an automated process (Mandrake or otherwise) that
> I can use that  will upgrade my kernel for me, or will I
> have to do this manually by  compiling the new kernel ?

If a new kernel is out in a repository (official or
unofficial) you can install through urpmi or anyway the old
rpm way (rpm -ivh or using a graphical frontend); anyway,
the new kernel will be added and the old one will still be
installed unless you decide to do.
--
Smiley 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

[newbie] Kernel 2.6.11 upgrade.

2005-03-16 Thread Tony

Hi,

I've just installed 10.1 AMD64, but had to install the nVidia gfx driver 
after for my 6600GT card.
While installing this with the nVidia .run script, I got an error specifying 
that need to upgrade to at least kernel 2.6.11 because of an accounting issue 
in the current kernel version, 2.6.9.

Is there an automated process (Mandrake or otherwise) that I can use that 
will upgrade my kernel for me, or will I have to do this manually by 
compiling the new kernel ?

Thanks for any advice.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-03-02 Thread Dennis Myers

On Tuesday 01 March 2005 07:45 pm, RickSisler wrote:
> Dennis Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Has anyone had a problem with getting the Nvidia drivers to work with the
> > -24 kernel? I can not get an install on this and it does not give a real
> > reason in the logs.  > Does anyone know of a solution? TIA
>snip<
> Hi Dennis,
> I had to add these with the 6629 driver,
> --kernel-name=2.6.8.1-24mdk
> --kernel-source-path=/usr/src/linux-2.6.8.1-24mdk
> If this helps and it builds, as smiley suggests, make sure the
> "nvidia" is in your /etc/modprobe.preload config file.
> the club CD's or DVD. May help someday.

Thanks, to Rick,  the  addition of --kernel-name=** did the trick. I was 
adding --kernel-source-path but not getting anywhere. Now I have the NVIDIA 
logo pop up and ut2003 plays once again. Thanks for the key and to all who 
gave input.  Life is good, just don't weaken.
-- 
Dennis M. linux user #180842


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

RE: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-03-02 Thread Hugh Dixon




-Original Message-
From:   SnapafunFrank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Wed 02-Mar-05 21:32
To: newbie@linux-mandrake.com
Cc: 
Subject:Re: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

Dennis Myers wrote:

>On Tuesday 01 March 2005 01:52 pm, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
>  
>
>>On February 28, 2005 22:13, Dennis Myers wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Has anyone had a problem with getting the Nvidia drivers to work with the
>>>-24 kernel? I can not get an install on this and it does not give a real
>>>reason in the logs. This is the installer log print
>>>  
>>>
>>...
>>
>>I've gotten the 6629 NVidia driver working fine with the -24 kernel with a
>>GeForce FX 5200 board on my new computer.
>>
>>And I had the hand-patched 6111 NVidia driver (see list archives for
>>details) working with the -12 kernel and a TNT 64 board on my old computer.
>>
>>But I can't get the TNT 64 board to work with the -24 kernel, with either
>>the hand-patched 6111 or the (unpatched) 6629 NVidia driver. Either one
>>installs fine, and X comes up fine, but any attempt to start an OpenGl
>>program results in a Segmentation Fault. I haven't made any great effort to
>>resolve this, just went back to the nv driver.
>>
>>Sorry I can't be more help.
>>
>>
>Huh, now the -12 kernel and/or 6111 driver will not work either. Same error 
>message. I have been all over the internet looking for answers and tried them 
>all. Thanks for everyone's suggestions, but no soap. Guess it's time to clean 
>house and try again. I have really no sense when it comes to  installing  
>kernels side by side.  Up Up and away.
>  
>
Just a thought. I have 6111 installed OK but it is against a 2.6.~ 
kernel and I understood at the time that that is what was required for 
the OpenGL stuff to work. As I said, just a thought.

-- 
Newbie Seeking USER_FUNCTIONALITY always!

Regards

SnapafunFrank

Big or small, a challenge requires the same commitment to resolve.
Registered Linux User # 324213 


I am using the 6111 driver (FX 5700 based, ASUS graphics card) on a custom 
2.6.8.1-24 kernel.  I cannot remember if I installed it on the standard mdk 
kernel (I suspect not).  I use it with 2 screens.  It works fine, except I have 
occasional problems where it will spit the dummy on my XF86Config file, and I 
have to go back to the original, and reset the twin view options in the config 
file. (?Device in use? error)
Hugh





<>
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-03-02 Thread SnapafunFrank

Dennis Myers wrote:
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 01:52 pm, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
 

On February 28, 2005 22:13, Dennis Myers wrote:
   

Has anyone had a problem with getting the Nvidia drivers to work with the
-24 kernel? I can not get an install on this and it does not give a real
reason in the logs. This is the installer log print
 

...
I've gotten the 6629 NVidia driver working fine with the -24 kernel with a
GeForce FX 5200 board on my new computer.
And I had the hand-patched 6111 NVidia driver (see list archives for
details) working with the -12 kernel and a TNT 64 board on my old computer.
But I can't get the TNT 64 board to work with the -24 kernel, with either
the hand-patched 6111 or the (unpatched) 6629 NVidia driver. Either one
installs fine, and X comes up fine, but any attempt to start an OpenGl
program results in a Segmentation Fault. I haven't made any great effort to
resolve this, just went back to the nv driver.
Sorry I can't be more help.
   

Huh, now the -12 kernel and/or 6111 driver will not work either. Same error 
message. I have been all over the internet looking for answers and tried them 
all. Thanks for everyone's suggestions, but no soap. Guess it's time to clean 
house and try again. I have really no sense when it comes to  installing  
kernels side by side.  Up Up and away.
 

Just a thought. I have 6111 installed OK but it is against a 2.6.~ 
kernel and I understood at the time that that is what was required for 
the OpenGL stuff to work. As I said, just a thought.

--
Newbie Seeking USER_FUNCTIONALITY always!
Regards
SnapafunFrank
Big or small, a challenge requires the same commitment to resolve.
Registered Linux User # 324213 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-03-01 Thread Dennis Myers

On Tuesday 01 March 2005 01:52 pm, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
> On February 28, 2005 22:13, Dennis Myers wrote:
> > Has anyone had a problem with getting the Nvidia drivers to work with the
> > -24 kernel? I can not get an install on this and it does not give a real
> > reason in the logs. This is the installer log print
>
> ...
>
> I've gotten the 6629 NVidia driver working fine with the -24 kernel with a
> GeForce FX 5200 board on my new computer.
>
> And I had the hand-patched 6111 NVidia driver (see list archives for
> details) working with the -12 kernel and a TNT 64 board on my old computer.
>
> But I can't get the TNT 64 board to work with the -24 kernel, with either
> the hand-patched 6111 or the (unpatched) 6629 NVidia driver. Either one
> installs fine, and X comes up fine, but any attempt to start an OpenGl
> program results in a Segmentation Fault. I haven't made any great effort to
> resolve this, just went back to the nv driver.
>
> Sorry I can't be more help.
Huh, now the -12 kernel and/or 6111 driver will not work either. Same error 
message. I have been all over the internet looking for answers and tried them 
all. Thanks for everyone's suggestions, but no soap. Guess it's time to clean 
house and try again. I have really no sense when it comes to  installing  
kernels side by side.  Up Up and away.
-- 
Dennis M. linux user #180842


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-03-01 Thread RickSisler

Dennis Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Has anyone had a problem with getting the Nvidia drivers to work with the -24 
> kernel? I can not get an install on this and it does not give a real reason 
> in the logs. This is the installer log print
> option status:
[...]

>   force tls   : (not specified)
>   force compat32 tls  : (not specified)
>   X install prefix: /usr/X11R6
>   OpenGL install prefix   : /usr
>   compat32 install prefix : (not specified)
>   installer install prefix: /usr
>   utility install prefix  : /usr
>   kernel name : (not specified)
>   kernel include path : (not specified)
>   kernel source path  : (not specified)
>   kernel output path  : (not specified)
>   kernel install path : (not specified)
>   proc mount point: /proc
>   ui  : (not specified)
>   tmpdir  : /root/tmp
>   ftp mirror  : ftp://download.nvidia.com
>   RPM file list   : (not specified)
[...]

> -> Kernel source path: '/usr/src/linux-2.6.8.1-24mdk'
> -> Performing CC test with CC="cc".
> ERROR: If you are using a Linux 2.4 kernel, please make sure
>you either have configured kernel sources matching your
>kernel or the correct set of kernel headers installed
>on your system.
>
>If you are using a Linux 2.6 kernel, please make sure
>you have configured kernel sources matching your kernel
>installed on your system. If you specified a separate
>output directory using either the "KBUILD_OUTPUT" or
>the "O" KBUILD parameter, make sure to specify this
>directory with the SYSOUT environment variable or with
>the appropriate nvidia-installer command line option.
> ERROR: Installation has failed.  Please see the file
>'/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' for details.  You may find suggestions
>on fixing installation problems in the README available on the Linux
>driver download page at www.nvidia.com.
> 
> 
> Does anyone know of a solution? TIA
Hi Dennis,
I had to add these with the 6629 driver, 
--kernel-name=2.6.8.1-24mdk 
--kernel-source-path=/usr/src/linux-2.6.8.1-24mdk
If this helps and it builds, as smiley suggests, make sure the 
"nvidia" is in your /etc/modprobe.preload config file.

It would build but I had trouble with the 6629, same as Ron, 
glxinfo and glxgears would run for root, but no users, new or old,
it would give segmentation faults. (strace showed the perms were 
/proc related, mmx and sse, -tls some type of threading issues, 
beyond my limited understanding. I posted this to the list, no replys,
so I kept looking for answers) 

Ron mentioned the patched 6111 driver, I found this link on 
www.nvnews.net 
look for zander's reply from nvidia corp. 
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=43896&highlight=kernel+2.6.8
I reverted back to 6111 and downloaded the patch for this nvidia driver. 
Extracted the sources, patched them, added the installer parameters
and it successfully compiled. 

My hardware is a GeForceFX 5200 with a nForce2 chipset and
All is working now  .. the only difference is, 
While not noticable, its 100-150 FPS slower 8( than the 
-12mdk kernel.

HTH somehow ..

p.s. also found this info on the club forum, 
"[10.1/10.2+] dkms : a new way to install 3rd party drivers"
http://forum.mandrakeclub.com/viewtopic.php?t=32376
but don't know much about it. Dkms may make this easier when 
upgrading kernels, and it was used for 10.1 and -12mdk from 
the club CD's or DVD. May help someday.
-- 
RickS
gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x24AABE61

When a ladder was stolen from a store, the manager said that
further steps would be taken ..


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-03-01 Thread Smiley

On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:52:18 -0700
Ron Hunter-Duvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
> But I can't get the TNT 64 board to work with the -24 kernel, with either the 
> hand-patched 6111 or the (unpatched) 6629 NVidia driver. Either one installs 
> fine, and X comes up fine, but any attempt to start an OpenGl program results 
> in a Segmentation Fault. I haven't made any great effort to resolve this, 
> just went back to the nv driver.

It seems same problem I had; as I said in a recent post, you can verify if in 
/etc/modprobe.preload you have "nvidia"...
--
Smiley


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-03-01 Thread Ron Hunter-Duvar

On February 28, 2005 22:13, Dennis Myers wrote:
> Has anyone had a problem with getting the Nvidia drivers to work with the
> -24 kernel? I can not get an install on this and it does not give a real
> reason in the logs. This is the installer log print
...

I've gotten the 6629 NVidia driver working fine with the -24 kernel with a 
GeForce FX 5200 board on my new computer.

And I had the hand-patched 6111 NVidia driver (see list archives for details) 
working with the -12 kernel and a TNT 64 board on my old computer.

But I can't get the TNT 64 board to work with the -24 kernel, with either the 
hand-patched 6111 or the (unpatched) 6629 NVidia driver. Either one installs 
fine, and X comes up fine, but any attempt to start an OpenGl program results 
in a Segmentation Fault. I haven't made any great effort to resolve this, 
just went back to the nv driver.

Sorry I can't be more help.

-- 
Ron
ronhd at users dot sourceforge dot net

Opinions expressed here are all mine.

"As you know, necessity is the mother of invention.
I don't know who the father is. Remorse, I guess." - Red Green

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-03-01 Thread Smiley

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:51:07 -0500
Dan Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Strange it worked perfectly here kernel smp and nvidia 6629,  the only 
> thing i can think of is did you use the kernel-source-stripped or the 
> full source ?  Here i used the full source.

Also look if in /etc/modprobe.preload you have "nvidia"; if you
don't (or you have "nvidia-agp") try add it and save (you
must be root) then reboot.
--
Smiley


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-03-01 Thread Dan Gordon

On March 1, 2005 12:13 am, Dennis Myers wrote:
> -> Kernel source path: '/usr/src/linux-2.6.8.1-24mdk'
> -> Performing CC test with CC="cc".
> ERROR: If you are using a Linux 2.4 kernel, please make sure
>you either have configured kernel sources matching your
>kernel or the correct set of kernel headers installed
>on your system.
>
>If you are using a Linux 2.6 kernel, please make sure
>you have configured kernel sources matching your kernel
>installed on your system. If you specified a separate
>output directory using either the "KBUILD_OUTPUT" or
>the "O" KBUILD parameter, make sure to specify this
>directory with the SYSOUT environment variable or with
>the appropriate nvidia-installer command line option.
> ERROR: Installation has failed.  Please see the file
>'/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' for details.  You may find
> suggestions on fixing installation problems in the README available
> on the Linux driver download page at www.nvidia.com.
>
Strange it worked perfectly here kernel smp and nvidia 6629,  the only 
thing i can think of is did you use the kernel-source-stripped or the 
full source ?  Here i used the full source.

Regards,
Dan Gordon
-- 
Tue Mar  1 08:48:03 EST 2005
 08:48:03 up 17:01,  1 user,  load average: 0.13, 0.13, 0.04
checkuary, n:
The thirteenth month of the year.  Begins New Year's Day and ends
when a person stops absentmindedly writing the old year on his checks.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

[newbie] kernel 2.6.8.1-24mdk and Nvidia don't work

2005-02-28 Thread Dennis Myers

Has anyone had a problem with getting the Nvidia drivers to work with the -24 
kernel? I can not get an install on this and it does not give a real reason 
in the logs. This is the installer log print
option status:
  license pre-accepted: false
  update  : false
  force update: false
  expert  : false
  uninstall   : false
  driver info : false
  no precompiled interface: false
  no ncurses color: false
  query latest driver ver : false
  OpenGL header files : false
  no questions: false
  silent  : false
  no backup   : false
  kernel module only  : false
  sanity  : false
  add this kernel : false
  no runlevel check   : false
  no network  : false
  no ABI note : false
  no RPMs : false
  force tls   : (not specified)
  force compat32 tls  : (not specified)
  X install prefix: /usr/X11R6
  OpenGL install prefix   : /usr
  compat32 install prefix : (not specified)
  installer install prefix: /usr
  utility install prefix  : /usr
  kernel name : (not specified)
  kernel include path : (not specified)
  kernel source path  : (not specified)
  kernel output path  : (not specified)
  kernel install path : (not specified)
  proc mount point: /proc
  ui  : (not specified)
  tmpdir  : /root/tmp
  ftp mirror  : ftp://download.nvidia.com
  RPM file list   : (not specified)

Using: nvidia-installer ncurses user interface
-> License accepted.
-> There appears to already be a driver installed on your system (version: 
1.0-
   6629).  As part of installing this driver (version: 1.0-6629), the existing 
   driver will be uninstalled.  Are you sure you want to continue? ('no' will 
a
   bort installation) (Answer: Yes)
-> No precompiled kernel interface was found to match your kernel; would you 
li
   ke the installer to attempt to download a kernel interface for your kernel 
f
   rom the NVIDIA ftp site (ftp://download.nvidia.com)? (Answer: Yes)
-> No matching precompiled kernel interface was found on the NVIDIA ftp site;
   this means that the installer will need to compile a kernel interface for
   your kernel.
-> Kernel source path: '/usr/src/linux-2.6.8.1-24mdk'
-> Performing CC test with CC="cc".
ERROR: If you are using a Linux 2.4 kernel, please make sure
   you either have configured kernel sources matching your
   kernel or the correct set of kernel headers installed
   on your system.
   
   If you are using a Linux 2.6 kernel, please make sure
   you have configured kernel sources matching your kernel
   installed on your system. If you specified a separate
   output directory using either the "KBUILD_OUTPUT" or
   the "O" KBUILD parameter, make sure to specify this
   directory with the SYSOUT environment variable or with
   the appropriate nvidia-installer command line option.
ERROR: Installation has failed.  Please see the file
   '/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' for details.  You may find suggestions
   on fixing installation problems in the README available on the Linux
   driver download page at www.nvidia.com.


Does anyone know of a solution? TIA
-- 
Dennis M. linux user #180842


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

[newbie] kernel "flavor" differences ??

2005-02-07 Thread RickSisler

Hi All,
As I am upgrading the kernel, I noticed these new kernel flavors..
There used to be a webpage for the different kernel descriptions for
Mandrake, but I can't seem to find it now .. I checked the wiki,
google, club and cooker but had no luck .. 

We have these kernels now ..
standard kernel --> kernel-2.6.8.1-24mdk
kernel-BOOT
kernel-enterprise
kernel-i586-up-1GB
kernel-i686-up-64GB
kernel-maximum
kernel-secure
kernel-smp

I know what BOOT, enterprise, secure and smp are, and we used to
have i686-up-4GB, but what are.. maximum, i686-up-64GB, i586-up-1GB
now ?
I think I read that i586-up-1GB had something to do with the AMDk6
from lurking the cooker-list but I can't seem to find confirmation. 

I have 1GB RAM and previously had to install the i686-up-1GB or
enterprise kernels, as with mdk 10OE.

Anyway, I found reference to the 1GB HIGHMEM in the defconfig from
the kernel source for -12mdk: 

#
# Firmware Drivers
#
CONFIG_EDD=y
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
CONFIG_BADRAM=y

Does this mean this now supported in the *standard* kernel 
.. or 2.6.8.1-24mdk now ?

It would seem so, as the config says, and was wondering if it was
documented somewhere since I have *very* little knowledge of kernel
components ... TIA

-- 
RickS  Registered Linux user #338463
Mdk 10.1 OE - Linux 2.6.8.1-12mdk@ http://counter.li.org

gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x24AABE61


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

[newbie] kernel-source-2.6-10

2005-01-05 Thread SnapafunFrank

In the past, whenever I wanted to compile a `new` kernel, I would first 
up do:

# urpmi kernel-source-2.6-n
Then do:
# urpmi kernel
The kernels were not the latest release and of course rpm's were available.
Because of my usb concerns I thought I would `install` kernel-2.6-10 - 
knowing I would have to compile from linux-2.6.10.tar.bz2.

So first thing, read the README at least, and straight off I'm lost, 
though later it looks like my usual one step at a time approach will get 
there.

Here's were I'm lost:
"- If you install the full sources, put the kernel tarball in a
  directory where you have permissions (eg. your home directory) and
  unpack it"
OK - no prob with that.
"Do NOT use the /usr/src/linux area! "
Again, no prob, sort of covered that, I thought.
"- Make sure you have no stale .o files and dependencies lying around:
   cd linux
   make mrproper
  You should now have the sources correctly installed."
Huh! But I've only unpacked the bz2 file into my home directory - how 
can anything be installed at this point?

Just in case I'm having a braindead week :
"BUILD directory for the kernel:
  When compiling the kernel all output files will per default be
  stored together with the kernel source code.
**[ Fair enough ]**
  Using the option "make O=output/dir" allow you to specify an alternate
  place for the output files (including .config).
  Example:
kernel source code:/usr/src/linux-2.6.N
build directory:/home/name/build/kernel
** [ Possibly not something I might require but better remember, just in 
case ] **

  To configure and build the kernel use:
  cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.N
** WOAH - WAIT UP- where in blue blazes did the directory 
/usr/src/linux-2.6.N come from - yes. I have directories for previous 
versions here but certainly not this one yet.

So right now I have the bz2 file in my /home/frank/src/ directory, have 
it unpacked and I thought ready to go?

So I go back and re-read things and find:
" If you install the full sources. "
Right back at the beginning. The only file I have found is the bz2 file, 
how can I have already installed the full sources. I thought they were 
part and parcel of the bz2 file and as yet had to be installed.

Lost - braindead - BOTH.  Any one want to do the rear seat kicking here?
--
Newbie Seeking USER_FUNCTIONALITY always!
Regards
SnapafunFrank
Big or small, a challenge requires the same commitment to resolve.
Registered Linux User # 324213 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel source for 9.2??

2004-12-28 Thread Randall D. Hobbs

On Tuesday 28 December 2004 9:59 am, cervixcouch wrote:
> I feel kinda doofy asking this, but where do I find the kernel source from
> the installation CDs?  I'm trying to install software that needs to find
> it in /usr/src/linux.
>
> I've looked at all three CDs but haven't seen anything that appears to be
> the source for my kernel (2.4.22.10mdk).  When I went into MCC and did a
> search for 'kernel' in the package manager, I got a higher kernel version
> than the one I have.
>
> What is the kernel src called on the disks?  Is it called something
> obscure, like "bimbos-on-juice.2.4.22.10mdk", and I'm just too braindead
> to catch it???
>
> Yeah, I know I can download it from various places online, but I assumed
> it would be installable from the installation CDs, like it was in 7.2.

Actually, 9.2 didn't include the kernel source on the CD's (for whatever 
reason). Your only option is to download it from the web...

-- 
Take care,
Randall Hobbs
Programmer - System Administrator - Chip Castle Dot Com, Inc.
Web Hosting * Programming * Software
http://www.chipcastle.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel source for 9.2??

2004-12-28 Thread Anne Wilson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 28 Dec 2004 15:59, cervixcouch wrote:
> I feel kinda doofy asking this, but where do I find the kernel source from
> the installation CDs?  I'm trying to install software that needs to find
> it in /usr/src/linux.
>
> I've looked at all three CDs but haven't seen anything that appears to be
> the source for my kernel (2.4.22.10mdk).  When I went into MCC and did a
> search for 'kernel' in the package manager, I got a higher kernel version
> than the one I have.
>
The update site carries the latest version.  Kernel updates come generally 
because of security problems, so you should get the latest kernel anyway.  
Don't attempt to 'upgrade' the kernel, just install the new one.  An 
additional stanza will be added to lilo.conf and you will be able to select 
either kernel from lilo, if you do have problems (which is not very likely).  
Then get the matching source.

Anne
- -- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?  Mandrake at all levels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB0Ya7kFAvMr/nNX8RAmPAAJ97Hg47DAN9H6BRJpnRF14rR7JNQQCfRGZ2
m8EsXjoOZQxP1UJ7VcERQZ0=
=PfzX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

[newbie] Kernel source for 9.2??

2004-12-28 Thread cervixcouch

I feel kinda doofy asking this, but where do I find the kernel source from
the installation CDs?  I'm trying to install software that needs to find
it in /usr/src/linux.

I've looked at all three CDs but haven't seen anything that appears to be
the source for my kernel (2.4.22.10mdk).  When I went into MCC and did a
search for 'kernel' in the package manager, I got a higher kernel version
than the one I have.

What is the kernel src called on the disks?  Is it called something
obscure, like "bimbos-on-juice.2.4.22.10mdk", and I'm just too braindead
to catch it???

Yeah, I know I can download it from various places online, but I assumed
it would be installable from the installation CDs, like it was in 7.2.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

RE: [newbie] Kernel SOurce

2004-11-17 Thread Manaxus

Hi guys, thanks for the responses.

I checked in /usr/src/linux before I wrote to the list and there were no
symlinks and there were no /usr/src/name_of_kernel-source.mdk either. 

I went back to my install of 10.0 and verified that it should be there
so I am assuming that even though I selected to install kernel sources,
it didn't. 

Thanks anyway. 

-Artemis

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Wilkowski
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Kernel SOurce

Hi,
It should be in /usr/src/linux which is linked to
/usr/src/name_of_kernel-source.mkd

tsw

--- Manaxus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> I am trying to work with version 9.1 with respect to
> device driver
> development and I chose to install kernel source
> upon installation but I
> cannot find ANY .c file. The headers are there, but
> none of the .c's.
> 
>  
> 
> When I searched I was logged in as root user,
> searching from the /
> directory and I issued the following command:
> 
> Find -name swapfile.c -mount
> 
>  
> 
> This is the same for all .c files. 
> 
>  
> 
> Can anyone enlighten me as to where the source code
> is at?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 

__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel SOurce

2004-11-17 Thread Thomas Wilkowski

Hi,
It should be in /usr/src/linux which is linked to
/usr/src/name_of_kernel-source.mkd


tsw


--- Manaxus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> I am trying to work with version 9.1 with respect to
> device driver
> development and I chose to install kernel source
> upon installation but I
> cannot find ANY .c file. The headers are there, but
> none of the .c's.
> 
>  
> 
> When I searched I was logged in as root user,
> searching from the /
> directory and I issued the following command:
> 
> Find -name swapfile.c -mount
> 
>  
> 
> This is the same for all .c files. 
> 
>  
> 
> Can anyone enlighten me as to where the source code
> is at?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com 
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel SOurce

2004-11-17 Thread mikkel

> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am trying to work with version 9.1 with respect to device driver
> development and I chose to install kernel source upon installation but I
> cannot find ANY .c file. The headers are there, but none of the .c's.
>
>
>
> When I searched I was logged in as root user, searching from the /
> directory and I issued the following command:
>
> Find -name swapfile.c -mount
>
>
>
> This is the same for all .c files.
>
>
>
> Can anyone enlighten me as to where the source code is at?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Try /usr/src/linux - it should be a symlink to the real source directory
tree in /usr/src.  The actualy .c files are spread amoung different
subdirectories branching from there.  The drivers are fairly well devided
up by type, with some drivers having their own subdirectory...

Mikkel


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

[newbie] Kernel SOurce

2004-11-17 Thread Manaxus









Hello,

 

I am trying to work with version 9.1 with respect to device
driver development and I chose to install kernel source upon installation but I
cannot find ANY .c file. The headers are there, but none of the .c’s.

 

When I searched I was logged in as root user, searching from
the / directory and I issued the following command:

Find –name swapfile.c –mount

 

This is the same for all .c files. 

 

Can anyone enlighten me as to where the source code is at?

 

Thanks.

[newbie] kernel module for ATI CARD?

2004-11-14 Thread John linux-user

Where to get kernel module file for ATI CARD?



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel update source/binary mismatch

2004-10-25 Thread Stew Benedict


On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:

> # urpmi kernel
> Everything already installed
> 
> Finally, I did the following:
> 
> # urpmi kernel-2.6.3.19
> 
>
>  ftp://ftp.proxad.net/pub/Distributions_Linux/Mandrakelinux/official/updates/
> 10.0/RPMS/./kernel-2.6.3.19mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm ...
> 
> And now it's downloading the new kernel binary! What's up with that?
> auto-select doesn't work with kernel binaries, but it does with kernel
> source? Shouldn't the two always be kept in sync? And why doesn't "urpmi

most times, yes, one would want them in sync if your intent is to build 
modules for your binary kernel

> kernel" find the latest version of the kernel? Why should I have to specify
> which version I want? Very strange.
> 

urpmi --fuzzy kernel will return a list, if "urpmi kernel" doesn't

All binary kernel packages have unique names, so you can have more than 
one installed at a time. (Can be handy if your new kernel won't boot your 
system for some reason).

-- 
Stew Benedict
Mandrakesoft
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

[newbie] Kernel update source/binary mismatch

2004-10-25 Thread Ron Hunter-Duvar

I never got a sympa confirm request for this the first time, and it doesn't 
seem to have come through the list, so here it is again:

This past Friday (Oct. 22) I decided it was time to update my Mdk 10.0
 system, so I did the usual commands as root:

# urpmi.update -a
# urpmi --auto-select

I noticed that one of the updates selected was kernel-source-2.6.3-19mdk. But
there was no corresponding kernel-2.6.3.19mdk package.

I checked in /boot and the rpm database, in case I had gotten the binary
without the source in a previous update. But the latest kernel binary I have
installed is kernel-2.6.3.16mdk (and that was back on Aug. 13). This is the
kernel that I'm currently booting with:

# uname -r
2.6.3-16mdk

In case the kernel binary was a bit late arriving, I did the same urpmi
commands today, and I just get "Everything already installed". In case
auto-select was somehow missing it, I also did this:

# urpmi kernel
Everything already installed

Finally, I did the following:

# urpmi kernel-2.6.3.19

   
 ftp://ftp.proxad.net/pub/Distributions_Linux/Mandrakelinux/official/updates/
10.0/RPMS/./kernel-2.6.3.19mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm ...

And now it's downloading the new kernel binary! What's up with that?
auto-select doesn't work with kernel binaries, but it does with kernel
source? Shouldn't the two always be kept in sync? And why doesn't "urpmi
kernel" find the latest version of the kernel? Why should I have to specify
which version I want? Very strange.

--
Ron Hunter-Duvar
ronhd at users dot sourceforge dot net

Opinions expressed here are all mine. Rights to use
these opinions are granted under the GNU GPL.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel-source-2.x.x.rpm versus kernel-2.x.x.src.rpm?

2004-10-21 Thread Sevatio


Randall D. Hobbs wrote:
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 08:57 pm, Sevatio wrote:
What's the difference between kernel-source-2.x.x.rpm and
kernel-2.x.x.src.rpm?  Could you make one with the other?
Thanks,
Sevatio

Hi Sevatio. The kernel-source-2.x.x.rpm file is the one you want for building 
other files which depend on the kernel header files - that's the source code 
that was actually used to build the kernel, in a ready to install module. 
What you do with that source is pretty much up to you.

The kernel-2.x.x.src.rpm file is used to actually build the RPM's which make 
up the kernels for your system PLUS the kernel-source RPM. When you rebuild 
it using rpmbuild, it will generate a regular kernel, an SMP kernel, an 
enterprise kernel, a kernel capable of handling memory up to 4 gigs, and the 
RPM file for the kernel-source as well. So, for the sake of simplicity, you 
want the kernel-source.




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Thanks very much for all that info.
Sev

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] kernel-source-2.x.x.rpm versus kernel-2.x.x.src.rpm?

2004-10-20 Thread Randall D. Hobbs

On Wednesday 20 October 2004 08:57 pm, Sevatio wrote:
> What's the difference between kernel-source-2.x.x.rpm and
> kernel-2.x.x.src.rpm?  Could you make one with the other?
>
> Thanks,
> Sevatio

Hi Sevatio. The kernel-source-2.x.x.rpm file is the one you want for building 
other files which depend on the kernel header files - that's the source code 
that was actually used to build the kernel, in a ready to install module. 
What you do with that source is pretty much up to you.

The kernel-2.x.x.src.rpm file is used to actually build the RPM's which make 
up the kernels for your system PLUS the kernel-source RPM. When you rebuild 
it using rpmbuild, it will generate a regular kernel, an SMP kernel, an 
enterprise kernel, a kernel capable of handling memory up to 4 gigs, and the 
RPM file for the kernel-source as well. So, for the sake of simplicity, you 
want the kernel-source.

-- 
Take care,
Randall Hobbs
Programmer - System Administrator - Chip Castle Dot Com, Inc.
Web Hosting * Programming * Software
http://www.chipcastle.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

[newbie] kernel-source-2.x.x.rpm versus kernel-2.x.x.src.rpm?

2004-10-20 Thread Sevatio

What's the difference between kernel-source-2.x.x.rpm and 
kernel-2.x.x.src.rpm?  Could you make one with the other?

Thanks,
Sevatio

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] Kernel-Source for 2.4.x on 10.1ce?

2004-10-20 Thread Sevatio

I found it.  It's in Cooker's Main rpms.
Sevatio
Sevatio wrote:
Where would you find the Kernel-source-2.4.x rpm for 10.1ce?
thanks
Sevatio


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

[newbie] Kernel-Source for 2.4.x on 10.1ce?

2004-10-20 Thread Sevatio

Where would you find the Kernel-source-2.4.x rpm for 10.1ce?
thanks
Sevatio

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

1 - 100 of 838 matches

Mail list logo