Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-26 Thread Gabriel Fernández

Hi there:

   Thanks for the suggestions.  I tried to get the cooker mirror as 
suggested by Axalon.  However, I am unable to do so because I do not have a 
working version of Linux-Mandrake installed.  I cannot boot my machine with 
the provided boot kernel because I get access errors to both the secondary 
harddrive and the CD-R/RW drive.

   Is there anything else I can try? Or, should I just give up 
Linux-Mandrake altogether and go back to Slackware?

   Thanks,

Gabriel


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-26 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, you wrote:

>Thanks for the feeaback.  Does this mean that the HP CD-R/RW 8200i drive 
> I have is incompatible with the Mandrake 6.0 kernel I am using to boot up?
> 
No problem. :-) That's what we're here for. :-)
>
> >"Cooker" is the pre-release version of Mandrake. Think of
> >it as the "Beta" version of the next release of Mandrake.
> 
>Where do I get this version?  Also, where can I get alternate custom boot 
> kernels?
> 
www.linux-mandrake.com? Other than that, I wouldn't know
where...
John



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-25 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Gabriel Fernández wrote:

> Dear John:
> 
> >What he's saying is CD drives are more particular
> >about the system trying to access them using DMA/UDMA
> >(another way to access an "IDE" device) than hard drives
> >when they don't support that method of accessing the drive.
> 
>Thanks for the feeaback.  Does this mean that the HP CD-R/RW 8200i drive 
> I have is incompatible with the Mandrake 6.0 kernel I am using to boot up?
> 
> > >>C: Try it with a recent mirror of Cooker
> >
> >"Cooker" is the pre-release version of Mandrake. Think of
> >it as the "Beta" version of the next release of Mandrake.
> 
>Where do I get this version?  Also, where can I get alternate custom boot 
> kernels?
> 
>Thanks,
> 
> Gabriel
> 
> 
> ___
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

http://www.linux-mandrake.com/cooker
and 
Um dunno



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-25 Thread Gabriel Fernández

Dear John:

>What he's saying is CD drives are more particular
>about the system trying to access them using DMA/UDMA
>(another way to access an "IDE" device) than hard drives
>when they don't support that method of accessing the drive.

   Thanks for the feeaback.  Does this mean that the HP CD-R/RW 8200i drive 
I have is incompatible with the Mandrake 6.0 kernel I am using to boot up?

> >>C: Try it with a recent mirror of Cooker
>
>"Cooker" is the pre-release version of Mandrake. Think of
>it as the "Beta" version of the next release of Mandrake.

   Where do I get this version?  Also, where can I get alternate custom boot 
kernels?

   Thanks,

Gabriel


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-25 Thread John Aldrich

On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, you wrote:
> >
> >There's some bad logic in the code that desides which drives to enable DMA 
> >cdroms are less tolerant than hardrives when you try and activate it and 
> >they do not support it.
> 
>I am confused by this statement.  I think I understand the kernel does 
> not support the particular CD-ROM that I have and that's the reason for the 
> errors.  However, below is the output from the kernel indicating that the 
> CD-ROM drive was recognized.  It does not say the brand, but the description 
> is right on the money (HP CD-Writer Plus 8200i, 4X/4X/24X).
> 
What he's saying is CD drives are more particular
about the system trying to access them using DMA/UDMA
(another way to access an "IDE" device) than hard drives
when they don't support that method of accessing the drive.

>>C: Try it with a recent mirror of Cooker

>I have no idea what this means.  Could you please
>elaborate?

"Cooker" is the pre-release version of Mandrake. Think of
it as the "Beta" version of the next release of Mandrake.



Re: Re[2]: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread Gabriel Fernández

Hi Sebastian:

   Thanks for your input.  Actually, I have errors by the time the kernel is 
trying to mount the filesystems.  The only choice I have made so far is to 
press ENTER to start the installation.

   Hence, my partitions are still intact.  In fact, I can still boot the 
current version of Slackware Linux that I have installed.  However, I am 
unable to go far down in the installation to actually answer any other 
questions.

   Thanks,

 Gabriel

>From: "Sebastian L C Goh"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re[2]: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems
>Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 11:57:25 -0700
>
>  I used the Mandrake-Macmillan Linux and managed to install though it
>  is my first time. Maybe just good luck.
>
>  Anyway, I probably took the wrong turn somewhere. I seems to have
>  reinitialised my entire harddisk and now my Windows 95 partition is
>  missing. Lucky for me this is a test machine. But I recognise that it
>  is due to my fault in not reading the instructions properly and not
>  following the prompts properly. Now I must learn how to recover back
>  my Windows partition.
>
>  Better luck to you with the new distribution.


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread Gabriel Fernández

Hi there:

>Sorry, I'm a busy person I'm sure you can understand.

   Nothing personal.  Just frustrated that my message started a list of 
messages not related to my question. ;-)

   I appreciate all the help that I can get.

>VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesystem)
>hdb: lost interrupt
>hdb: drive_cmd: status=0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
> status error: status 0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
>hdb: drive not ready for command
>VFS: Disk change detected on device ide1 (22,0)
>hdc: drive_cmd: error=0x04
>hdc: lost interrupt:
>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>hdc: lost interrupt:
>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>...
>
>There's some bad logic in the code that desides which drives to enable DMA 
>cdroms are less tolerant than hardrives when you try and activate it and 
>they do not support it.

   I am confused by this statement.  I think I understand the kernel does 
not support the particular CD-ROM that I have and that's the reason for the 
errors.  However, below is the output from the kernel indicating that the 
CD-ROM drive was recognized.  It does not say the brand, but the description 
is right on the money (HP CD-Writer Plus 8200i, 4X/4X/24X).

>Pentium 75MHz
>64MB RAM
>ide0 @ 0x1f0-0x1f7, 0x3f6 on irq 14
>ide1 @ 0x170-0x177, 0x376 on irq 15 (serialized with ide0)
>hda: Conner Peripherals 1275MB - CFA1275A,
> 1220MB w/256KB Cahce, CHS=619/64/63
>hdb: Maxtor 72004 AP,
> 1916MB w/128KB Cache, CHS=973/64/63
>hdc: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM DVD-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048KB Cache
>Partition check:
>hda: hda1, hda2, hda3
>hdb: hdb1, hdb2

   These are your suggestions:

>A: Swap the cdrom out for something "with less additude"

I do not have another CD-ROM.  I actually want to use my CD-R/RW drive 
under Linux.  Also, I do not know what you mean by "less additude".

>B: Find HD space and install it from there

   If I keep the CD-R/RW unit installed, this won't make any difference.  I 
won't be able to finish the boot up.

>C: Try it with a recent mirror of Cooker

   I have no idea what this means.  Could you please elaborate?

>D: Ask me for custom boot disks and i'll see if i can find time

   Please consider the request made.  Could you be so kind to provide me 
with a boot disk/image that I can use to install the software?

   BTW, I just learned that there were several Mandrake "releases".  I am 
using the one provided by MacMillan (The Complete Linux OS 6.0).

   Thanks,

Gabriel


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



[newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread Gabriel Fernández

Dear all:

   OK, I am starting to dislike this mailing list and Mandrake 6.0.  I sent 
a question to the list asking for help and what I get back is a flame war.

   Could somebody please focus on the issue at hand and provide any type of 
helpful information that will assist me in resolving my problem?

   The description of the problem is below.

   Thanks,

Gabriel

>   I am a Slackware user, but I have heard so many good things about Read 
>Hat that I decided to give it a try.  So far it has not been a positive 
>experience . . .
>
>   My machine is configured as follows:
>
>Pentium 75MHz
>64MB RAM
>ide0 @ 0x1f0-0x1f7, 0x3f6 on irq 14
>ide1 @ 0x170-0x177, 0x376 on irq 15 (serialized with ide0)
>hda: Conner Peripherals 1275MB - CFA1275A,
> 1220MB w/256KB Cahce, CHS=619/64/63
>hdb: Maxtor 72004 AP,
> 1916MB w/128KB Cache, CHS=973/64/63
>hdc: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM DVD-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048KB Cache
>Partition check:
>hda: hda1, hda2, hda3
>hdb: hdb1, hdb2
>
>   I have Windows 95 and Slackware Linux currently installed.  The first 
>hard drive has a partition for Windows 95 and two partitions
>for Linux (/swap and /).  The second hard drive has one partition for 
>Windows 95 (mounted under Linux) and a partition for Linux (/usr).  Both 
>drives are under the IDE0 controller.
>
>   Under the IDE1 controller, I have a CD-R/RW drive.
>
>   Everything works fine with Windows 95 and the version of Slakware that I 
>have installed.
>
>   When I tried installing Mandrake 6.0, I was under the impression that 
>the installation would take care of deleting or repartition the
>hard drives.  However, this is not the case.
>
>   After the installation type is selected and the kernel is loaded.  I see 
>a message "Running install..." and everything hangs.
>
>   When I check with ALT-F4, I can see the following error messages:
>
>VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesystem)
>hdb: lost interrupt
>hdb: drive_cmd: status=0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
> status error: status 0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
>hdb: drive not ready for command
>VFS: Disk change detected on device ide1 (22,0)
>hdc: drive_cmd: error=0x04
>hdc: lost interrupt:
>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>hdc: lost interrupt:
>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>...
>
>   I do not understand why the hard drives are used and mounted correctly 
>with Windows 95 and Slackware, but with Mandrake 6.0 they are not 
>recognized.
>
>   Do you have any ideas?
>
>   Thanks,
>
>Gabriel


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



[newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread Gabriel Fernández

Dear all:

   OK, I am starting to dislike this mailing list and Mandrake 6.0.  I sent 
a question to the list asking for help and what I get back is a flame war.

   Could somebody please focus on the issue at hand and provide any type of 
helpful information that will assist me in resolving my problem?

   The description of the problem is below.

   Thanks,

Gabriel

>   I am a Slackware user, but I have heard so many good things about Read 
>Hat that I decided to give it a try.  So far it has not been a positive 
>experience . . .
>
>   My machine is configured as follows:
>
>Pentium 75MHz
>64MB RAM
>ide0 @ 0x1f0-0x1f7, 0x3f6 on irq 14
>ide1 @ 0x170-0x177, 0x376 on irq 15 (serialized with ide0)
>hda: Conner Peripherals 1275MB - CFA1275A,
> 1220MB w/256KB Cahce, CHS=619/64/63
>hdb: Maxtor 72004 AP,
> 1916MB w/128KB Cache, CHS=973/64/63
>hdc: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM DVD-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048KB Cache
>Partition check:
>hda: hda1, hda2, hda3
>hdb: hdb1, hdb2
>
>   I have Windows 95 and Slackware Linux currently installed.  The first 
>hard drive has a partition for Windows 95 and two partitions
>for Linux (/swap and /).  The second hard drive has one partition for 
>Windows 95 (mounted under Linux) and a partition for Linux (/usr).  Both 
>drives are under the IDE0 controller.
>
>   Under the IDE1 controller, I have a CD-R/RW drive.
>
>   Everything works fine with Windows 95 and the version of Slakware that I 
>have installed.
>
>   When I tried installing Mandrake 6.0, I was under the impression that 
>the installation would take care of deleting or repartition the
>hard drives.  However, this is not the case.
>
>   After the installation type is selected and the kernel is loaded.  I see 
>a message "Running install..." and everything hangs.
>
>   When I check with ALT-F4, I can see the following error messages:
>
>VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesystem)
>hdb: lost interrupt
>hdb: drive_cmd: status=0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
> status error: status 0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
>hdb: drive not ready for command
>VFS: Disk change detected on device ide1 (22,0)
>hdc: drive_cmd: error=0x04
>hdc: lost interrupt:
>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>hdc: lost interrupt:
>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>...
>
>   I do not understand why the hard drives are used and mounted correctly 
>with Windows 95 and Slackware, but with Mandrake 6.0 they are not 
>recognized.
>
>   Do you have any ideas?
>
>   Thanks,
>
>Gabriel


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread John Aldrich

Well, I've had the same problem with BOTH distributions of Linux. :-) My
problem is it won't boot from the IDE drivebut if I boot off a floppy,
everything is JUST fine! :-) Oh, well... I finally gave up and took my
dual-PPro machine to the only computer store in town that I know of that
knows anything besides Windows! :-)
John

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 5:33 PM
Subject: RE: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems


> Don't be so offended.  I just was stating the fact that from my peronal
experience, I had no problems with RedHat as opposed to Mandrake.
>
> Given my current time constraints is was simply less time consuming to try
a different distribution.  Thus far I've no problems the "different"
distribution.
>
> If you're still fussy and wanting to rant you can mail me directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
>
> On Tue, 24 Aug 1999 11:58:52   Ken Wilson wrote:
> >Who cares what a coward uses.  If you believe so strongly in your
> >statements, next time sign your name.
> >
> >Ken Wilson
> >First Law of Optimization: The speed of a nonworking program is
> >irrelevant
> >(Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 11:12 AM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems
> >>
> >>
> >>   I had to stop using the Mandrake distribution all together,
> >> it was just too much trouble to bother with.  I now use the
> >> *OFFICAL* RedHat ditribution, and I've had absolutely  no problems.
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread Steve Philp

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Don't be so offended.  I just was stating the fact that from my peronal experience, 
>I had no problems with RedHat as opposed to Mandrake.


Well, except for the fact that your  key silently broke in the
upgrade.  Try wrapping those lines at 75 characters, Sparky.

-- 
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread

Don't be so offended.  I just was stating the fact that from my peronal experience, I 
had no problems with RedHat as opposed to Mandrake.

Given my current time constraints is was simply less time consuming to try a different 
distribution.  Thus far I've no problems the "different" distribution.

If you're still fussy and wanting to rant you can mail me directly at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

On Tue, 24 Aug 1999 11:58:52   Ken Wilson wrote:
>Who cares what a coward uses.  If you believe so strongly in your
>statements, next time sign your name.
>
>Ken Wilson
>First Law of Optimization: The speed of a nonworking program is
>irrelevant
>(Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 11:12 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems
>>
>>
>>   I had to stop using the Mandrake distribution all together,
>> it was just too much trouble to bother with.  I now use the
>> *OFFICAL* RedHat ditribution, and I've had absolutely  no problems.
>>
>
>


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread Ripcrd6

Gee, Chuck thanks for sharing.  Next time just wave, it's quieter and more
productive.   You didn't say what you didn't like, what equipment you had
trouble w/, why it was so much trouble.
Thanks for your stunning input and insightful commentary, but next time
just wave, my inbox will silently thank you.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



>  I had to stop using the Mandrake distribution all together, it was just
too much trouble to bother with.  I now use the *OFFICAL* RedHat
ditribution, and I've had absolutely  no problems.
>
>
>--
>
>On Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:23:53   Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
>>Dear all:
>>
>>   I am a Slackware user, but I have heard so many good things about Read
>>Hat that I decided to give it a try.  So far it has not been a positive
>>experience . . .
>>
>>   My machine is configured as follows:
>>
>>Pentium 75MHz
>>64MB RAM
>>ide0 @ 0x1f0-0x1f7, 0x3f6 on irq 14
>>ide1 @ 0x170-0x177, 0x376 on irq 15 (serialized with ide0)
>>hda: Conner Peripherals 1275MB - CFA1275A,
>> 1220MB w/256KB Cahce, CHS=619/64/63
>>hdb: Maxtor 72004 AP,
>> 1916MB w/128KB Cache, CHS=973/64/63
>>hdc: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM DVD-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048KB Cache
>>Partition check:
>>hda: hda1, hda2, hda3
>>hdb: hdb1, hdb2
>>
>>   I have Windows 95 and Slackware Linux currently installed.  The first
>>hard drive has a partition for Windows 95 and two partitions for Linux
>>(/swap and /).  The second hard drive has one partition for Windows 95
>>(mounted under Linux) and a partition for Linux (/usr).  Everything works
>>fine so far . . .
>>
>>   When I tried installing Mandrake 6.0, I was under the impression that
the
>>installation would take care of deleting or repartition the hard drives.
>>However, this is not the case.
>>
>>   After the installation type is selected and the kernel is loaded.  I
see
>>a message "Running install..." and everything hangs.
>>
>>   When I check with ALT-F4, I can see the following error messages:
>>
>>VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesystem)
>>hdb: lost interrupt
>>hdb: drive_cmd: status=0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
>> status error: status 0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
>>hdb: drive not ready for command
>>VFS: Disk change detected on device ide1 (22,0)
>>hdc: drive_cmd: error=0x04
>>hdc: lost interrupt:
>>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>>hdc: lost interrupt:
>>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>>...
>>
>>   I do not understand why the hard drives are used and mounted correctly
>>with Windows 95 and Slackware.
>>
>>   Do you have any ideas?
>>
>>   Thanks,
>>
>>Gabriel
>>
>>
>>___
>>Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>>
>
>
>--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.



RE: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread Ken Wilson

Who cares what a coward uses.  If you believe so strongly in your
statements, next time sign your name.

Ken Wilson
First Law of Optimization: The speed of a nonworking program is
irrelevant
(Steve Heller, 'Efficient C/C++ Programming')

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 11:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems
>
>
>   I had to stop using the Mandrake distribution all together,
> it was just too much trouble to bother with.  I now use the
> *OFFICAL* RedHat ditribution, and I've had absolutely  no problems.
>



Re: [newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-24 Thread

  I had to stop using the Mandrake distribution all together, it was just too much 
trouble to bother with.  I now use the *OFFICAL* RedHat ditribution, and I've had 
absolutely  no problems.


--

On Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:23:53   Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
>Dear all:
>
>   I am a Slackware user, but I have heard so many good things about Read 
>Hat that I decided to give it a try.  So far it has not been a positive 
>experience . . .
>
>   My machine is configured as follows:
>
>Pentium 75MHz
>64MB RAM
>ide0 @ 0x1f0-0x1f7, 0x3f6 on irq 14
>ide1 @ 0x170-0x177, 0x376 on irq 15 (serialized with ide0)
>hda: Conner Peripherals 1275MB - CFA1275A,
> 1220MB w/256KB Cahce, CHS=619/64/63
>hdb: Maxtor 72004 AP,
> 1916MB w/128KB Cache, CHS=973/64/63
>hdc: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM DVD-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048KB Cache
>Partition check:
>hda: hda1, hda2, hda3
>hdb: hdb1, hdb2
>
>   I have Windows 95 and Slackware Linux currently installed.  The first 
>hard drive has a partition for Windows 95 and two partitions for Linux 
>(/swap and /).  The second hard drive has one partition for Windows 95 
>(mounted under Linux) and a partition for Linux (/usr).  Everything works 
>fine so far . . .
>
>   When I tried installing Mandrake 6.0, I was under the impression that the 
>installation would take care of deleting or repartition the hard drives.  
>However, this is not the case.
>
>   After the installation type is selected and the kernel is loaded.  I see 
>a message "Running install..." and everything hangs.
>
>   When I check with ALT-F4, I can see the following error messages:
>
>VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesystem)
>hdb: lost interrupt
>hdb: drive_cmd: status=0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
> status error: status 0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
>hdb: drive not ready for command
>VFS: Disk change detected on device ide1 (22,0)
>hdc: drive_cmd: error=0x04
>hdc: lost interrupt:
>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>hdc: lost interrupt:
>hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
>...
>
>   I do not understand why the hard drives are used and mounted correctly 
>with Windows 95 and Slackware.
>
>   Do you have any ideas?
>
>   Thanks,
>
>Gabriel
>
>
>___
>Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.



[newbie] Mandrake 6.0 Install Problems

1999-08-23 Thread Gabriel Fernández

Dear all:

   I am a Slackware user, but I have heard so many good things about Read 
Hat that I decided to give it a try.  So far it has not been a positive 
experience . . .

   My machine is configured as follows:

Pentium 75MHz
64MB RAM
ide0 @ 0x1f0-0x1f7, 0x3f6 on irq 14
ide1 @ 0x170-0x177, 0x376 on irq 15 (serialized with ide0)
hda: Conner Peripherals 1275MB - CFA1275A,
 1220MB w/256KB Cahce, CHS=619/64/63
hdb: Maxtor 72004 AP,
 1916MB w/128KB Cache, CHS=973/64/63
hdc: ATAPI 24X CD-ROM DVD-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048KB Cache
Partition check:
hda: hda1, hda2, hda3
hdb: hdb1, hdb2

   I have Windows 95 and Slackware Linux currently installed.  The first 
hard drive has a partition for Windows 95 and two partitions for Linux 
(/swap and /).  The second hard drive has one partition for Windows 95 
(mounted under Linux) and a partition for Linux (/usr).  Everything works 
fine so far . . .

   When I tried installing Mandrake 6.0, I was under the impression that the 
installation would take care of deleting or repartition the hard drives.  
However, this is not the case.

   After the installation type is selected and the kernel is loaded.  I see 
a message "Running install..." and everything hangs.

   When I check with ALT-F4, I can see the following error messages:

VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesystem)
hdb: lost interrupt
hdb: drive_cmd: status=0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
 status error: status 0x58 {DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest}
hdb: drive not ready for command
VFS: Disk change detected on device ide1 (22,0)
hdc: drive_cmd: error=0x04
hdc: lost interrupt:
hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
hdc: lost interrupt:
hdc: cdrom_pc_intr: The drive appears confused (ireason=0x1)
...

   I do not understand why the hard drives are used and mounted correctly 
with Windows 95 and Slackware.

   Do you have any ideas?

   Thanks,

Gabriel


___
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com