[newbie] Signal 11 (SIGSEGV): Korganizer on edit of apointment

2001-06-18 Thread Mark Parrish

Greetings to all.

Our situation is this: We "Upgraded" our installation of Mandrake from 
version 7.2 to version 8.0. Thus my current version of KDE is: 2.1.2.

Upon arriving at our destination upgrade, Korganizer will no longer allow us 
add new appointments or change existing ones.

If I start korganizer from the command-line this is the data that prints to 
the screen:
"
[mark@msp mark]$ korganizer
[mark@msp mark]$ QTime::setHMS Invalid time -1:-1:-1.000
QTime::setHMS Invalid time -1:-1:-1.000
QTime::setHMS Invalid time -1:-1:-1.000
QTime::setHMS Invalid time -1:-1:-1.000
KCrash: crashing crashRecursionCounter = 2
KCrash: Application Name = korganizer path = 
 
[mark@msp mark]$
"

If I choose to do a backtrace I also obtain this data:
"
[New Thread 1024 (LWP 1842)]
0x40f261d9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#0  0x40f261d9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x40f95f2c in __check_rhosts_file () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x406d4188 in KCrash::defaultCrashHandler () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.3

#3  0x410ad0fe in pthread_sighandler (signo=11, ctx=

  {gs = 0, __gsh = 0, fs = 0, __fsh = 0, es = 43, __esh = 0, ds = 43, 
__dsh = 0, edi = 1090044629, esi = 2, ebp = 3221199528, esp = 3221199456, ebx 
= 1090084652, edx = 3221201296, ecx = 2, eax = 39575552, trapno = 14, err = 
4, eip = 1089334222, cs = 35, __csh = 0, eflags = 66050, esp_at_signal = 
3221199456, ss = 43, __ssh = 0, fpstate = 0xbfff97e0, oldmask = 2147483648, 
cr2 = 39575580})

at signals.c:97
#4  0x40e9ab68 in killpg () from /lib/libc.so.6
#5  0x4002040d in _IO_vfprintf () from /lib/libsafe.so.2.0
#6  0x40023da7 in vfprintf () from /lib/libsafe.so.2.0
#7  0x4001f2ba in _IO_vfprintf () from /lib/libsafe.so.2.0
#8  0x40023cb3 in vfprintf () from /lib/libsafe.so.2.0
#9  0x408a793a in qWarning () from /usr/lib/libqt.so.2
"
Any help would certainly be appreciated.

Thanks,

Mark




RE: [newbie] Signal 11

1999-09-27 Thread Richard Adams

On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> This is only my suggestion, as AFAIK there are several possible causes of
> this. I also was running happily for months when all of a sudden it started
> happening - about a year ago now so nothing to do with 6.0/6.1.
> 
> I was running a Cyrix chip which i had setup according to my motherboards
> recommendations. On further inspection the chip had different settings
> printed on the chip itself. I changed the settings on my m/b to those
> printed on the chip.
> 
> The change effectively used a higher multiplier with a slower bus speed -
> hey presto my problems went away and never came back. I think the Cyrix
> chips may already be overclocked, so it pays to set them up slightly on the
> slower side - you REALLY won't notice the difference!

May i say you used the wrong word, you REALLY will notice that sig 11
will dissapier.

I hope i'm not going to start a cyrix users flame session, but if we
look thro'  different list archives 90% of machines which have sig11
probs have cyrix processors.

> Just a suggestion, perhaps worth checking out.

A very good suggestion if i may say so.

-- 
Regards Richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [newbie] Signal 11

1999-09-26 Thread martin

This is only my suggestion, as AFAIK there are several possible causes of
this. I also was running happily for months when all of a sudden it started
happening - about a year ago now so nothing to do with 6.0/6.1.

I was running a Cyrix chip which i had setup according to my motherboards
recommendations. On further inspection the chip had different settings
printed on the chip itself. I changed the settings on my m/b to those
printed on the chip.

The change effectively used a higher multiplier with a slower bus speed -
hey presto my problems went away and never came back. I think the Cyrix
chips may already be overclocked, so it pays to set them up slightly on the
slower side - you REALLY won't notice the difference!

Just a suggestion, perhaps worth checking out.

Martin.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arend teRaa
> Sent: 23 September 1999 23:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [newbie] Signal 11
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a machine that has been running Mandrake 6.0 for the
> last couple of months.  Yesterday I tried to upgrade it to
> 6.1 but I keep getting signal 11 errors.  Actually, I wasn't
> even doing an upgrade, I wiped the drive clean and did a
> fresh installation.  I seem to remember that Signal 11 errors
> always mean a hardware problem of some sort but I don't
> understand why it was working fine under 6.0?  The errors are
> happening during the installation process - usually when it
> is installing packages.  I have tried having it check for bad
> blocks during the format - that didn't help.  Is there
> anything I can do or should I just go back to 6.0?
>
> It's running on a Cyrix MII/PR300 chip.  IDE 1.2 GB drive (I
> don't know the make and model offhand).  The MB is a PCCHIPS
> M571 with 64MB Ram installed.
>
> Thanks
> Arend teRaa
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



Re: [newbie] Signal 11 -Reply

1999-09-24 Thread Arend teRaa

>>> Richard Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/24/99 03:06pm >>>
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> I have a machine that has been running Mandrake 6.0 for the last  


> It's running on a Cyrix MII/PR300 chip.  IDE 1.2 GB drive (I don't know >the make 
>and model offhand).  The MB is a PCCHIPS M571 with 64MB >Ram installed.

>Now here we have one of those mails i normaly ignore and delete, the
>user has not set his LINE WRAP in his editor.

Well excuse me but I am writing this using Groupwise since my linux box is now in an 
unuseable state and I am not aware of any way to set this - If anyone can tell me how 
to do it, I would be happy to do so.

>Anyway i belive i can help a little here which is the only reason i
>am repling, otherwise the mail would have been disregarded.

>The most probable cause here is the cyrix CPU clocked at a too higher
>speed.

I'm pretty sure I have it clocked at the proper speed so that's not the problem.

>I suggest you take a look at http:/bitwizard.nl/sig11

Thanks, I will do that.

Arend



[newbie] Signal 11

1999-09-24 Thread Mike Fieschko

>>> "Arend" == Arend teRaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Arend> Hi all, I have a machine that has been running Mandrake 6.0
Arend> for the last couple of months.  Yesterday I tried to
Arend> upgrade it to 6.1 but I keep getting signal 11 errors.
Arend> Actually, I wasn't even doing an upgrade, I wiped the drive
Arend> clean and did a fresh installation.  I seem to remember
Arend> that Signal 11 errors always mean a hardware problem of
Arend> some sort but I don't understand why it was working fine
Arend> under 6.0?  The errors are happening during the
Arend> installation process - usually when it is installing
Arend> packages.  I have tried having it check for bad blocks
Arend> during the format - that didn't help.  Is there anything I
Arend> can do or should I just go back to 6.0?

[snip]

As a start, see

http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/

though this page isn't specific as to Sig 11's during an install.

-- 
Mike Fieschko, West Orange, NJ, USA
X-Mailer: XEmacs 21.1, VM 6.71 and random-sig.el
X-Face header is me! http://www.cs.indiana.edu/picons/ftp/faq.html
Kernel 2.2.13-9mdk mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.viconet.com/fieschko/home.htm
Sep 24 Our Lady of Ransom
"There is a case for telling the truth; there is a case for avoiding
the scandal; but there is no possible defense for the man who tells
the scandal, but does not tell the truth." - [G.K. Chesterton, in ILN,
7/18/08]



Re: [newbie] Signal 11

1999-09-24 Thread Richard Adams

On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, you wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> I have a machine that has been running Mandrake 6.0 for the last couple of months.  
>Yesterday I tried to upgrade it to 6.1 but I keep getting signal 11 errors.  
>Actually, I wasn't even doing an upgrade, I wiped the drive clean and did a fresh 
>installation.  I seem to remember that Signal 11 errors always mean a hardware 
>problem of some sort but I don't understand why it was working fine under 6.0?  The 
>errors are happening during the installation process - usually when it is installing 
>packages.  I have tried having it check for bad blocks during the format - that 
>didn't help.  Is there anything I can do or should I just go back to 6.0?
> 
> It's running on a Cyrix MII/PR300 chip.  IDE 1.2 GB drive (I don't know the make and 
>model offhand).  The MB is a PCCHIPS M571 with 64MB Ram installed.

Now here we have one of those mails i normaly ignore and delete, the
user has not set his LINE WRAP in his editor.

Anyway i belive i can help a little here which is the only reason i
am repling, otherwise the mail would have been disregarded.

The most probable cause here is the cyrix CPU clocked at a too higher
speed.

I suggest you take a look at http:/bitwizard.nl/sig11

> Thanks
> Arend teRaa
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Regards Richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[newbie] Signal 11

1999-09-24 Thread Arend teRaa

Hi all, 

I have a machine that has been running Mandrake 6.0 for the last couple of months.  
Yesterday I tried to upgrade it to 6.1 but I keep getting signal 11 errors.  Actually, 
I wasn't even doing an upgrade, I wiped the drive clean and did a fresh installation.  
I seem to remember that Signal 11 errors always mean a hardware problem of some sort 
but I don't understand why it was working fine under 6.0?  The errors are happening 
during the installation process - usually when it is installing packages.  I have 
tried having it check for bad blocks during the format - that didn't help.  Is there 
anything I can do or should I just go back to 6.0?

It's running on a Cyrix MII/PR300 chip.  IDE 1.2 GB drive (I don't know the make and 
model offhand).  The MB is a PCCHIPS M571 with 64MB Ram installed.

Thanks
Arend teRaa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]