Re: [newbie] smp kernel

2004-10-17 Thread Dan Gordon
On October 17, 2004 08:41 am, Marek Pawinski wrote:
> Dan Gordon wrote:
> > On October 17, 2004 01:06 am, Marek Pawinski wrote:
> >>I am having a lot of segfaulting, my kernel, update kernel
> >> uninstalls itself and after a day or two my rpms i download seem
> >> to go bad with a smp kernel on ML OE, did you have these problems
> >> ? Can i run a normal kernel on a Hyper Threading machine ?
> >>
> >>Marek
> >
> > I had the same problems with Mandrake 10, now im running Mandrake
> > 10.1 and smp is working very well.
> > Yes a normal kernel should work just fine for you.  What version of
> > Mandrake are you running ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dan Gordon
>
> I tried ML 10.0 Official at first and then i tried ML 10.1 Community
> with the same results. I will try the normal kernel, can i leave HT
> enabled in the BIOS still though with the normal kernel ?
>

Yes just select normal kernel instead of smp when you get lilo prompt.

Regards,
Dan Gordon
-- 
 09:01:42 up 10:31,  2 users,  load average: 0.06, 0.12, 0.05
Sun Oct 17 09:01:42 EDT 2004
At the end of your life there'll be a good rest, and no further 
activities
are scheduled.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] smp kernel

2004-10-17 Thread Marek Pawinski
Dan Gordon wrote:
On October 17, 2004 01:06 am, Marek Pawinski wrote:
I am having a lot of segfaulting, my kernel, update kernel uninstalls
itself and after a day or two my rpms i download seem to go bad with
a smp kernel on ML OE, did you have these problems ? Can i run a
normal kernel on a Hyper Threading machine ?
Marek

I had the same problems with Mandrake 10, now im running Mandrake 10.1 
and smp is working very well.
Yes a normal kernel should work just fine for you.  What version of 
Mandrake are you running ?

Regards,
Dan Gordon
I tried ML 10.0 Official at first and then i tried ML 10.1 Community 
with the same results. I will try the normal kernel, can i leave HT 
enabled in the BIOS still though with the normal kernel ?

Marek

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] smp kernel

2004-10-17 Thread Dan Gordon
On October 17, 2004 01:06 am, Marek Pawinski wrote:
>
> I am having a lot of segfaulting, my kernel, update kernel uninstalls
> itself and after a day or two my rpms i download seem to go bad with
> a smp kernel on ML OE, did you have these problems ? Can i run a
> normal kernel on a Hyper Threading machine ?
>
> Marek

I had the same problems with Mandrake 10, now im running Mandrake 10.1 
and smp is working very well.
Yes a normal kernel should work just fine for you.  What version of 
Mandrake are you running ?

Regards,
Dan Gordon
-- 
Sun Oct 17 08:27:49 EDT 2004
 08:27:49 up  9:57,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00
On Monday mornings I am dedicated to the proposition that all men are
created jerks.
-- H. Allen Smith, "Let the Crabgrass Grow"


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] smp kernel

2004-10-16 Thread David Johnson
Wow.  I'm running the SMP kernel on my 2.8GHz P4 laptop and it works great.

I don't have much experience with it so far, but I haven't had a
single problem with it.  You should be able to install the single proc
kernel even on a multi-threaded machine though.


On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 07:06:07 +0200, Marek Pawinski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Gordon wrote:
> > Hello list,
> > A long time ago right about the time Mandrake 10 comunity came out
> > someone asked me to let them know how the smp kernel was running for
> > me.  Well all I can say is it was not good for me.  75% of the time
> > applications were segfaulting on me so I went with a regular kernel.
> > Now I have installed Mandrake 10.1 yesterday and the default kernel it
> > installed was 2.6.8.1-10mdksmp
> > and I am happy to report it is running very well,  I am very impressed
> > with how things are working and want to say way to go Mandrake.
> > Keep up the good work.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dan Gordon
> I am having a lot of segfaulting, my kernel, update kernel uninstalls
> itself and after a day or two my rpms i download seem to go bad with a
> smp kernel on ML OE, did you have these problems ? Can i run a normal
> kernel on a Hyper Threading machine ?
> 

-- 
David Johnson
http://www.edave.org


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] smp kernel

2004-10-16 Thread Marek Pawinski
Dan Gordon wrote:
Hello list,
A long time ago right about the time Mandrake 10 comunity came out 
someone asked me to let them know how the smp kernel was running for 
me.  Well all I can say is it was not good for me.  75% of the time 
applications were segfaulting on me so I went with a regular kernel.
Now I have installed Mandrake 10.1 yesterday and the default kernel it 
installed was 2.6.8.1-10mdksmp
and I am happy to report it is running very well,  I am very impressed 
with how things are working and want to say way to go Mandrake.
Keep up the good work.

Regards,
Dan Gordon
I am having a lot of segfaulting, my kernel, update kernel uninstalls 
itself and after a day or two my rpms i download seem to go bad with a 
smp kernel on ML OE, did you have these problems ? Can i run a normal 
kernel on a Hyper Threading machine ?

Marek

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] smp kernel

2004-10-16 Thread Dan Gordon
Hello list,
A long time ago right about the time Mandrake 10 comunity came out 
someone asked me to let them know how the smp kernel was running for 
me.  Well all I can say is it was not good for me.  75% of the time 
applications were segfaulting on me so I went with a regular kernel.
Now I have installed Mandrake 10.1 yesterday and the default kernel it 
installed was 2.6.8.1-10mdksmp
and I am happy to report it is running very well,  I am very impressed 
with how things are working and want to say way to go Mandrake.
Keep up the good work.

Regards,
Dan Gordon
-- 
Sat Oct 16 22:54:02 EDT 2004
 22:54:02 up 23 min,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.03
I know engineers.  They love to change things.
- Dr. McCoy


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] smp

2001-03-21 Thread Leland L Waters

I am using MDK 7.2 on an Abit BP6 motherboard with dual Celeron.

cat /proc/cpuinfo

Lists both processors identically. Does this mean that SMP is enabled
and working? If not, how do I verify smp?

What does "1101 bogomips" mean.

Thanks in advance!

Lee




[newbie] SMP on IBM PC Server 330?

2001-01-29 Thread Mike Osborne

I have an IBM PC Server 330 with 2 Pentium Pro 200 processors.  I installed 
Mandrake 7.2 on this machine initially, and showed two processors on bootup.

I reinstalled to get raid1 working, and I must have done something different 
-  I no longer see the two processors active.

Is Mandrake supposed to autodetect the 2nd processor, or do I need to be 
installing a certain way?  I didn't see any configuration details that 
mentioned SMP during the GUI install.

Thank you.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com





Re: [newbie] SMP support in 7.2 ?

2000-12-19 Thread LinuxTests

Yes, Mandrake 7.2 will install with SMP support when a clean install is done 
... just did it today on the Epox dual board  

On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, you wrote:

> > hello,
> i'm new to linux,and about to build a dual cpu machine.Can mandrake 7.2
> currently see and use 2 processors by default?.I was very surprised when i
> read that smp is not enabled in some distros (corel linux).I couldn't find
> any info at Mandrake's site. If not,is there an "easy" workaround? I don't
> think i can venture into recompiling the kernel at this point,so i'm
> looking for a distro that supports dual processors withoutmy intervention,
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> Cem


Content-Type: text/html; name="Attachment: 1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: 





[newbie] SMP support in 7.2 ?

2000-12-19 Thread Cem Topdemir



hello,
i'm new to linux,and about to build a dual cpu 
machine.Can mandrake 7.2 currently see and use 2 processors by default?.I was 
very surprised when i read that smp is not enabled in some distros (corel 
linux).I couldn't find any info at Mandrake's site.
If not,is there an "easy" workaround? I don't think 
i can venture into recompiling the kernel at this point,so i'm looking for a 
distro that supports dual processors withoutmy intervention,
 
thanks in advance,
 
Cem


Re: [newbie] SMP

2000-11-04 Thread Tyler Longren

open /proc/cpuinfo,
if you're running with 2 processors, it'll give specifications for cpu0 and
cpu1.

If you're NOT using both processors, and want to be.  Use the mkbootdisk
command to make a bookdisk of the SMP kernel located in /lib/modules.  If
you're running Mandrake 7.2, the command to make an SMP bootdisk is this:

mkbootdisk --device /dev/fd0 2.2.17-21mdksmp

Tyler

On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 13:16:50 US/Pacific
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [newbie] SMP
> 
> How can I find out if I'm running SMP Kernal or not???
> 
> 




[newbie] SMP

2000-11-04 Thread rserman

How can I find out if I'm running SMP Kernal or not???





RE: [newbie] SMP impossible on MDK 7.1

2000-06-18 Thread Jose M. Sanchez

I'm running 7.1 just fine in SMP mode (though not using hacked Celerons...)


Linux Version 2.2.15-4mdksecure, Compiled #1 SMP Wed May 10 14:16:48 CEST
2000
   Two 450MHz Intel Pentium II Processors, 511M RAM, 1789.14 Bogomips Total
 dualcpu.netrslts.com

This is an "out of the box" installation.

So, make of it what you will...

-JMS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


|-Original Message-
|From: E.B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 7:15 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [newbie] SMP impossible on MDK 7.1
|
|
|I've installed MDK 7.1 on my Abit BP6 (2 celerons 450 Mhz) with 128 Mb and
|the installation went fine. Now, when I boot and pick up 'Linux' with Grub
|(which is the option to boot on kernel with SMP support) I got this :
|
|Mounting proc filesystem OK
|Configuring kernel parameters OK
|Oops: 0002
|CPU: 1
|EIP: 0010: []
|EFLAGS: 00010246
|etc.
|
|Kernel panic: Attempt to kill the idle task
|
|
|I tried several times to boot using the smp support, got always the same
|message. I even tried to reinstall, didn't change nothing.
|And the funny thing is when I pick up the 'Linux-up' in Grub which is the
|kernel without SMP (and then a single processor recognized) it works fine.
|Of course, the two processors work fine (I checked with Win2K) and Mandrake
|did detect the two processors since it installed on its own the smp support
|and configured Grub for both smp and non smp kernels.
|So what the hell is going on ?
|Any idea ?
|
|Thanks
|
|Eric
|
|
|




[newbie] SMP impossible on MDK 7.1

2000-06-18 Thread E.B.

I've installed MDK 7.1 on my Abit BP6 (2 celerons 450 Mhz) with 128 Mb and
the installation went fine. Now, when I boot and pick up 'Linux' with Grub
(which is the option to boot on kernel with SMP support) I got this :

Mounting proc filesystem OK
Configuring kernel parameters OK
Oops: 0002
CPU: 1
EIP: 0010: []
EFLAGS: 00010246
etc.

Kernel panic: Attempt to kill the idle task


I tried several times to boot using the smp support, got always the same
message. I even tried to reinstall, didn't change nothing.
And the funny thing is when I pick up the 'Linux-up' in Grub which is the
kernel without SMP (and then a single processor recognized) it works fine.
Of course, the two processors work fine (I checked with Win2K) and Mandrake
did detect the two processors since it installed on its own the smp support
and configured Grub for both smp and non smp kernels.
So what the hell is going on ?
Any idea ?

Thanks

Eric






Re: [newbie] SMP Support

2000-05-02 Thread Pete Koning

On Tue, 2 May 2000, Christopher wrote:

)I hear that a lot, that its supposed to auto-detect for SMP - but in my
)case, it never hashuh.  Dunno if its my hardware, other operating
)systems such as BeOS and Winblows NT detect both CPUs without a hitch.  Ah
)wellh.

i agree.  as i said previously, i've tried it with a clean gigabyte
dual-board a few times. it didn't matter a fig whether i had a single or
dual cpu or whether the dip switches were set for single or dual mode
operation.  it just wouldn't install the smp kernel.  but you can set it
in lilo very easily.  look in lilo.conf.  still, it's a pain.  

)~Christopher
)
)> ~Christopher
)>
)> Yes, 7.0 will detect the SMP automatically during installation and
)> install an SMP kernel.  No worries there.
)>
)> 7.0 doesn't, out of the box, work the with UDMA/66 interfaces on the BP6
)> board though.  It'll make a boot disk during installation for you, but
)> it won't let you install on those drives.  A bit annoying, since the
)> patches for the HPT366 interface have been available since the 6.1
)> days...
)>
)> --
)> Steve Philp, MCSE/MCP+I
)> Network Administrator
)> Advance Packaging Corporation
)> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)>
)

/pete 

--- 
Pete Koning  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
System Administrator   Ph:(905)528-4936
Hamilton-Wentworth CommunityNetFx:(905)528-7578
---





Re: [newbie] SMP Support

2000-05-02 Thread Christopher

I hear that a lot, that its supposed to auto-detect for SMP - but in my
case, it never hashuh.  Dunno if its my hardware, other operating
systems such as BeOS and Winblows NT detect both CPUs without a hitch.  Ah
wellh.

~Christopher

> ~Christopher
>
> Yes, 7.0 will detect the SMP automatically during installation and
> install an SMP kernel.  No worries there.
>
> 7.0 doesn't, out of the box, work the with UDMA/66 interfaces on the BP6
> board though.  It'll make a boot disk during installation for you, but
> it won't let you install on those drives.  A bit annoying, since the
> patches for the HPT366 interface have been available since the 6.1
> days...
>
> --
> Steve Philp, MCSE/MCP+I
> Network Administrator
> Advance Packaging Corporation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>




[expert] Re: [newbie] SMP Support

2000-05-02 Thread Tom Wike

Steve,
I have just recently upgraded to a BP6 Motherboard and installed
Mandrake 7.0, followed the instructions at this web site:

http://netllama.ipfox.com/stepbystep.htm

under the 'ULTRA66' section, installed without a hitch on a drive
connected to the UDMA/66, no problem   :)

It did detect SMP and installed the proper kernel, detected my
SoundBlaster Live! and USR External 56K modem also.

Christopher wrote:
> 
> Howdy people, first off - Mandrake is my fav distro and I've tried quite a
> few - bravo!  Now, to my prob.  Does the installer for Mandrake (I have 7.0)
> detect for SMP support or is that something I add after installation?  My
> hardware is a Abit BP6 with two 500 mhz Celerons, 128 megs of RAM, VooDoo 3
> 3000 AGP, ect.  If it would work in SMP mode, I'd be very very happy  :-)
> Thnx!
> 
> ~Christopher

Yes, 7.0 will detect the SMP automatically during installation and
install an SMP kernel.  No worries there.

7.0 doesn't, out of the box, work the with UDMA/66 interfaces on the BP6
board though.  It'll make a boot disk during installation for you, but
it won't let you install on those drives.  A bit annoying, since the
patches for the HPT366 interface have been available since the 6.1
days...

- --
Steve Philp, MCSE/MCP+I
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
   Tom Wike
   UNIX System Administration
FDAO Productivity Infrastructure
Texas Instruments, Inc.

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Regular Mail:   7839 Churchill Way
Phone:  (972) 917-1252  M/S 3984
Fax:(972) 917-3891  Dallas, TX  75251
Cell PH:(972) 740-7748

E-Mail my Cell Phone:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or:   http://www.mobile.att.net/mc/pager_show.cgi
--




Re: [newbie] SMP Support

2000-05-02 Thread Pete Koning

On Tue, 2 May 2000, Steve Philp wrote:

)Christopher wrote:
)> 
)> Howdy people, first off - Mandrake is my fav distro and I've tried quite a
)> few - bravo!  Now, to my prob.  Does the installer for Mandrake (I have 7.0)
)> detect for SMP support or is that something I add after installation?  My
)> hardware is a Abit BP6 with two 500 mhz Celerons, 128 megs of RAM, VooDoo 3
)> 3000 AGP, ect.  If it would work in SMP mode, I'd be very very happy  :-)
)> Thnx!
)> 
)> ~Christopher
)
)Yes, 7.0 will detect the SMP automatically during installation and
)install an SMP kernel.  No worries there.

hmmm.  that's not my experience.  on two installs to clean gigabyte smp
boards i got the "standard kernel" and not the smp kernel.  it's easy
enough to configure after the fact though: look in lilo.conf and set the
appropriate image, then run lilo.

)7.0 doesn't, out of the box, work the with UDMA/66 interfaces on the BP6
)board though.  It'll make a boot disk during installation for you, but
)it won't let you install on those drives.  A bit annoying, since the
)patches for the HPT366 interface have been available since the 6.1
)days...
)
)--
)Steve Philp, MCSE/MCP+I
)Network Administrator
)Advance Packaging Corporation
)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)

/pete 

--- 
Pete Koning  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
System Administrator   Ph:(905)528-4936
Hamilton-Wentworth CommunityNetFx:(905)528-7578
---





Re: [newbie] SMP Support

2000-05-02 Thread Steve Philp

Christopher wrote:
> 
> Howdy people, first off - Mandrake is my fav distro and I've tried quite a
> few - bravo!  Now, to my prob.  Does the installer for Mandrake (I have 7.0)
> detect for SMP support or is that something I add after installation?  My
> hardware is a Abit BP6 with two 500 mhz Celerons, 128 megs of RAM, VooDoo 3
> 3000 AGP, ect.  If it would work in SMP mode, I'd be very very happy  :-)
> Thnx!
> 
> ~Christopher

Yes, 7.0 will detect the SMP automatically during installation and
install an SMP kernel.  No worries there.

7.0 doesn't, out of the box, work the with UDMA/66 interfaces on the BP6
board though.  It'll make a boot disk during installation for you, but
it won't let you install on those drives.  A bit annoying, since the
patches for the HPT366 interface have been available since the 6.1
days...

--
Steve Philp, MCSE/MCP+I
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [newbie] SMP not detecting

2000-03-05 Thread w.a.z.o.o

If you installed over a previous installation format the whole shit, I had
the same prob. And if ya turned on MPS 1.4 then change it to the default 1.1
in yer bios.

By the linux rules regarding SMP, the CPU's are so cl, I have to change
the Clock when I dual boot into windows, or the cpu's just get too warm,
though I could use CPUidle, but :)

Cya!




[newbie] SMP not detecting

2000-03-05 Thread root

I have Mandrake 7.0 and my friends computer (same as mine, dual 550/BP6)
detects the 2 cpus just fine on install, but mine didn't.  How can I go
about making this work, and why didn't it detect it on install?  Any
help is appreciated.

Thanks



[newbie] smp

2000-01-22 Thread Tony Eamick

does Mandrake7 automatically detect dual processors and install a smp
kernal ?



[newbie] SMP Kernel

2000-01-03 Thread Ryan Sumstad

I'm running a dual pent 200 mmx on a Tyan mobo.  NT doesn't like the mobo
and win95/98 doesn't use multi-proc so this could be the first time since
1994 that the second processor will be used!

BIOS recognizes the 2 processors during start-up.  When I compile the kernel
("make config") I choose SMP=Y APM=N MTRR=Y.  So far thoses are the only
items I should key into.  When I installed MDK6.5 I chose YES for installing
SMP.  If anyone has any other things to try let me know!

Thanks.

:o)





___
Visit Excite Shopping at http://shopping.excite.com 
 The fastest way to find your Holiday gift this season



RE: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

2000-01-01 Thread marcelo pimentel



-Original Message-
From: Ernest N. Wilcox Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 6:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules


On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Hidong Kim wrote:
  |  Hi, Gary,
  |
  |  Yes, I do have a dual Pentium II machine.  smp was working fine when I
  |  was running mandrake 5.3 kernel 2.2.9.  I think much of my difficulties
  |  here are due to my unfamiliarity with recompiling kernels from rpms.  I
  |  had always compiled kernels from tar.gz.  On the mandrake 6.1
  |  installation cd, there are several kernel rpms, like kernel,
  |  kernel-source, kernel-headers, etc.  Which of these packages are needed
  |  for compiling an smp kernel?  From the mandrake web site documentation,
  |  it seems like kernel-source and kernel-headers are all that you need.
  |  But then what about kernel-smp and kernel-smp-fb?  I tried recompiling

FYI - the kernel-smp and the kernel-smp-fb are installable kernels which
have
been compiled for you. You install the rpm, then edit /etc/lilo.conf, then
run
/sbin/lilo to write the boot loader to the HD. If you need better
documentation on lilo, it has been covered in great detail and should be
available in the archives.

HTH,

Ernie   ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


  |  an smp kernel with all of these packages installed, and still no
success
  |  getting a bootable smp 2.2.13-7mdk kernel.  For all of the people at
  |  mandrakesoft, is there a tar.gz of 2.2.13-7mdk?  Right now, a tar.gz of
  |  the 2.2.13-7mdk kernel source is more to be desired than gold by me.
  |  Thanks,
  |
  |
  |
  |  Hidong
  |
  |
  |  Gary K Stinnett Jr wrote:
  |  >
  |  > Do you have a multi-processor motherboard?
  |  > The smp kernel is for mult-processor systems.  "Thanks M Thompson at
Hot Mail"
  |  >
  |  > I had a problem with installing a driver for my sound card, I know
this is
  |  > completely different to your problem, because my linux box was using
the smp
  |  > kernel.
  |  >
  |  > After I did away with that and used the 2.2.13-7mdk kernel I did not
have a
  |  > problem.
  |  >
  |  > Later,
  |  >
  |  > Gary
  |  >
  |  > Warren Doney wrote:
  |  >
  |  > > Hidong Kim wrote:
  |  > > >
  |  > > > Hi, Axalon,
  |  > > >
  |  > > > I tried the 'depmod -a', but the 2.2.13-7mdk smp kernel is still
hanging
  |  > > > during boot at "Finding module dependencies".  Should it be
'depmod -a
  |  > > > 2.2.13-7mdk' or 'depmod -a 2.2.13'?  Thanks,
  |  > > >
  |  > >
  |  > > move your old modules from (top level) /lib/modules to a new folder
  |  > > /lib/oldmodules (I just used KFM)
  |  > > or whatever before you make modules-->lnstall-->depmod etc. Before
you
  |  > > reboot, put a working version of older kernel moudules in
/lib/modules
  |  > > so you can boot with an older kernel if anything goes wrong. I.E. I
made
  |  > > sure I had a bootdisk+modules for 2.2.13-7 before I rebooted my
newly
  |  > > compiled 2.2.13-22. I don't think it would work with 2 lots of the
same
  |  > > version e.g. 13-22 + 13-22 (havent tried it though). For me, depmod
  |  > > still
  |  > > spits out unresolved stuff, but I can boot o.k. off my new
kernel.
  |  > > I think I hosed out some suff from the src tree when I did a make
  |  > > mrproper or a make clean somewhere, Wish I'd moved the RPM from
/tmp
  |  > >
  |  > > Warren.




Re: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

2000-01-01 Thread Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.

On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Hidong Kim wrote:
  |  Hi, Gary,
  |  
  |  Yes, I do have a dual Pentium II machine.  smp was working fine when I
  |  was running mandrake 5.3 kernel 2.2.9.  I think much of my difficulties
  |  here are due to my unfamiliarity with recompiling kernels from rpms.  I
  |  had always compiled kernels from tar.gz.  On the mandrake 6.1
  |  installation cd, there are several kernel rpms, like kernel,
  |  kernel-source, kernel-headers, etc.  Which of these packages are needed
  |  for compiling an smp kernel?  From the mandrake web site documentation,
  |  it seems like kernel-source and kernel-headers are all that you need. 
  |  But then what about kernel-smp and kernel-smp-fb?  I tried recompiling

FYI - the kernel-smp and the kernel-smp-fb are installable kernels which have
been compiled for you. You install the rpm, then edit /etc/lilo.conf, then run
/sbin/lilo to write the boot loader to the HD. If you need better
documentation on lilo, it has been covered in great detail and should be
available in the archives.

HTH,

Ernie   ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


  |  an smp kernel with all of these packages installed, and still no success
  |  getting a bootable smp 2.2.13-7mdk kernel.  For all of the people at
  |  mandrakesoft, is there a tar.gz of 2.2.13-7mdk?  Right now, a tar.gz of
  |  the 2.2.13-7mdk kernel source is more to be desired than gold by me. 
  |  Thanks,
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  Hidong 
  |  
  |  
  |  Gary K Stinnett Jr wrote:
  |  > 
  |  > Do you have a multi-processor motherboard?
  |  > The smp kernel is for mult-processor systems.  "Thanks M Thompson at Hot Mail"
  |  > 
  |  > I had a problem with installing a driver for my sound card, I know this is
  |  > completely different to your problem, because my linux box was using the smp
  |  > kernel.
  |  > 
  |  > After I did away with that and used the 2.2.13-7mdk kernel I did not have a
  |  > problem.
  |  > 
  |  > Later,
  |  > 
  |  > Gary
  |  > 
  |  > Warren Doney wrote:
  |  > 
  |  > > Hidong Kim wrote:
  |  > > >
  |  > > > Hi, Axalon,
  |  > > >
  |  > > > I tried the 'depmod -a', but the 2.2.13-7mdk smp kernel is still hanging
  |  > > > during boot at "Finding module dependencies".  Should it be 'depmod -a
  |  > > > 2.2.13-7mdk' or 'depmod -a 2.2.13'?  Thanks,
  |  > > >
  |  > >
  |  > > move your old modules from (top level) /lib/modules to a new folder
  |  > > /lib/oldmodules (I just used KFM)
  |  > > or whatever before you make modules-->lnstall-->depmod etc. Before you
  |  > > reboot, put a working version of older kernel moudules in /lib/modules
  |  > > so you can boot with an older kernel if anything goes wrong. I.E. I made
  |  > > sure I had a bootdisk+modules for 2.2.13-7 before I rebooted my newly
  |  > > compiled 2.2.13-22. I don't think it would work with 2 lots of the same
  |  > > version e.g. 13-22 + 13-22 (havent tried it though). For me, depmod
  |  > > still
  |  > > spits out unresolved stuff, but I can boot o.k. off my new kernel.
  |  > > I think I hosed out some suff from the src tree when I did a make
  |  > > mrproper or a make clean somewhere, Wish I'd moved the RPM from /tmp
  |  > >
  |  > > Warren.



Re: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

1999-12-29 Thread Warren Doney

On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Hidong Kim wrote:
: Hi, Warren,
: 
: Thanks for the reply.  There's one thing I don't quite understand, see
: below:
: 
: 
: 
: Warren Doney wrote:
: > 
: > Hidong Kim wrote:
: > >
: > > Hi, Axalon,
: > >
: > > I tried the 'depmod -a', but the 2.2.13-7mdk smp kernel is still hanging
: > > during boot at "Finding module dependencies".  Should it be 'depmod -a
: > > 2.2.13-7mdk' or 'depmod -a 2.2.13'?  Thanks,
: > >
: > 
: > move your old modules from (top level) /lib/modules to a new folder
: > /lib/oldmodules (I just used KFM)
: > or whatever before you make modules-->lnstall-->depmod etc. Before you
: > reboot, put a working version of older kernel moudules in /lib/modules
: > so you can boot with an older kernel if anything goes wrong.
: 
: Can't I just boot off of an older kernel on a boot floppy in case of
: emergency?  If I put working versions of older kernel modules in
: /lib/modules, won't that overwrite the modules that were just created? 
:

UM, I don't Know for sure, but it worked for me, modules were in 2 seperate
folders, 2.2.13-7 & 2.2.13-22, If you don't have the modules for the older 
kernels, it might hang at finding dependancys.

Warren.



Re: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

1999-12-29 Thread Hidong Kim

Hi, Gary,

Yes, I do have a dual Pentium II machine.  smp was working fine when I
was running mandrake 5.3 kernel 2.2.9.  I think much of my difficulties
here are due to my unfamiliarity with recompiling kernels from rpms.  I
had always compiled kernels from tar.gz.  On the mandrake 6.1
installation cd, there are several kernel rpms, like kernel,
kernel-source, kernel-headers, etc.  Which of these packages are needed
for compiling an smp kernel?  From the mandrake web site documentation,
it seems like kernel-source and kernel-headers are all that you need. 
But then what about kernel-smp and kernel-smp-fb?  I tried recompiling
an smp kernel with all of these packages installed, and still no success
getting a bootable smp 2.2.13-7mdk kernel.  For all of the people at
mandrakesoft, is there a tar.gz of 2.2.13-7mdk?  Right now, a tar.gz of
the 2.2.13-7mdk kernel source is more to be desired than gold by me. 
Thanks,



Hidong 


Gary K Stinnett Jr wrote:
> 
> Do you have a multi-processor motherboard?
> The smp kernel is for mult-processor systems.  "Thanks M Thompson at Hot Mail"
> 
> I had a problem with installing a driver for my sound card, I know this is
> completely different to your problem, because my linux box was using the smp
> kernel.
> 
> After I did away with that and used the 2.2.13-7mdk kernel I did not have a
> problem.
> 
> Later,
> 
> Gary
> 
> Warren Doney wrote:
> 
> > Hidong Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Axalon,
> > >
> > > I tried the 'depmod -a', but the 2.2.13-7mdk smp kernel is still hanging
> > > during boot at "Finding module dependencies".  Should it be 'depmod -a
> > > 2.2.13-7mdk' or 'depmod -a 2.2.13'?  Thanks,
> > >
> >
> > move your old modules from (top level) /lib/modules to a new folder
> > /lib/oldmodules (I just used KFM)
> > or whatever before you make modules-->lnstall-->depmod etc. Before you
> > reboot, put a working version of older kernel moudules in /lib/modules
> > so you can boot with an older kernel if anything goes wrong. I.E. I made
> > sure I had a bootdisk+modules for 2.2.13-7 before I rebooted my newly
> > compiled 2.2.13-22. I don't think it would work with 2 lots of the same
> > version e.g. 13-22 + 13-22 (havent tried it though). For me, depmod
> > still
> > spits out unresolved stuff, but I can boot o.k. off my new kernel.
> > I think I hosed out some suff from the src tree when I did a make
> > mrproper or a make clean somewhere, Wish I'd moved the RPM from /tmp
> >
> > Warren.



Re: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

1999-12-29 Thread Gary K Stinnett Jr

Do you have a multi-processor motherboard?
The smp kernel is for mult-processor systems.  "Thanks M Thompson at Hot Mail"

I had a problem with installing a driver for my sound card, I know this is
completely different to your problem, because my linux box was using the smp
kernel.

After I did away with that and used the 2.2.13-7mdk kernel I did not have a
problem.

Later,

Gary

Warren Doney wrote:

> Hidong Kim wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Axalon,
> >
> > I tried the 'depmod -a', but the 2.2.13-7mdk smp kernel is still hanging
> > during boot at "Finding module dependencies".  Should it be 'depmod -a
> > 2.2.13-7mdk' or 'depmod -a 2.2.13'?  Thanks,
> >
>
> move your old modules from (top level) /lib/modules to a new folder
> /lib/oldmodules (I just used KFM)
> or whatever before you make modules-->lnstall-->depmod etc. Before you
> reboot, put a working version of older kernel moudules in /lib/modules
> so you can boot with an older kernel if anything goes wrong. I.E. I made
> sure I had a bootdisk+modules for 2.2.13-7 before I rebooted my newly
> compiled 2.2.13-22. I don't think it would work with 2 lots of the same
> version e.g. 13-22 + 13-22 (havent tried it though). For me, depmod
> still
> spits out unresolved stuff, but I can boot o.k. off my new kernel.
> I think I hosed out some suff from the src tree when I did a make
> mrproper or a make clean somewhere, Wish I'd moved the RPM from /tmp
>
> Warren.



Re: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

1999-12-29 Thread Hidong Kim

Hi, Warren,

Thanks for the reply.  There's one thing I don't quite understand, see
below:



Warren Doney wrote:
> 
> Hidong Kim wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Axalon,
> >
> > I tried the 'depmod -a', but the 2.2.13-7mdk smp kernel is still hanging
> > during boot at "Finding module dependencies".  Should it be 'depmod -a
> > 2.2.13-7mdk' or 'depmod -a 2.2.13'?  Thanks,
> >
> 
> move your old modules from (top level) /lib/modules to a new folder
> /lib/oldmodules (I just used KFM)
> or whatever before you make modules-->lnstall-->depmod etc. Before you
> reboot, put a working version of older kernel moudules in /lib/modules
> so you can boot with an older kernel if anything goes wrong.

Can't I just boot off of an older kernel on a boot floppy in case of
emergency?  If I put working versions of older kernel modules in
/lib/modules, won't that overwrite the modules that were just created? 
Thanks,



Hidong


 I.E. I made
> sure I had a bootdisk+modules for 2.2.13-7 before I rebooted my newly
> compiled 2.2.13-22. I don't think it would work with 2 lots of the same
> version e.g. 13-22 + 13-22 (havent tried it though). For me, depmod
> still
> spits out unresolved stuff, but I can boot o.k. off my new kernel.
> I think I hosed out some suff from the src tree when I did a make
> mrproper or a make clean somewhere, Wish I'd moved the RPM from /tmp
> 
> Warren.



Re: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

1999-12-29 Thread Warren Doney

Hidong Kim wrote:
> 
> Hi, Axalon,
> 
> I tried the 'depmod -a', but the 2.2.13-7mdk smp kernel is still hanging
> during boot at "Finding module dependencies".  Should it be 'depmod -a
> 2.2.13-7mdk' or 'depmod -a 2.2.13'?  Thanks,
>

move your old modules from (top level) /lib/modules to a new folder 
/lib/oldmodules (I just used KFM)
or whatever before you make modules-->lnstall-->depmod etc. Before you
reboot, put a working version of older kernel moudules in /lib/modules
so you can boot with an older kernel if anything goes wrong. I.E. I made
sure I had a bootdisk+modules for 2.2.13-7 before I rebooted my newly
compiled 2.2.13-22. I don't think it would work with 2 lots of the same 
version e.g. 13-22 + 13-22 (havent tried it though). For me, depmod
still
spits out unresolved stuff, but I can boot o.k. off my new kernel.
I think I hosed out some suff from the src tree when I did a make
mrproper or a make clean somewhere, Wish I'd moved the RPM from /tmp

Warren.



Re: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

1999-12-29 Thread Hidong Kim

Hi, Axalon,

I tried the 'depmod -a', but the 2.2.13-7mdk smp kernel is still hanging
during boot at "Finding module dependencies".  Should it be 'depmod -a
2.2.13-7mdk' or 'depmod -a 2.2.13'?  Thanks,



Hidong



Axalon Bloodstone wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Hidong Kim wrote:
> 
> > John Aldrich wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Hidong Kim wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Are there any known problems with kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and smp?  I
> > > > recompiled the smp kernel using the kernel-source and kernel-headers
> > > > RPMs from the Mandrake 6.1 installation CD, and now the machine won't
> > > > boot.  It hangs at "Finding module dependencies".  A up 2.2.13-7mdk
> > > > kernel boots fine.  Thanks,
> > > >
> > > You need to run "depmod -a" to re-do the module dependancies for the
> > > new kernel and install 'em in the config files.
> > > John
> >
> >
> > Hi, John,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply.  When do I do 'depmod -a'?  Here's the sequence of
> > commands I use to compile a kernel:
> >
> > 1. make mrproper
> > 2. make xconfig
> > 3. make dep
> > 4. make bzImage
> > 5. make modules
> > 6. make modules_install
> 
> depmod -a 'new_kernel_version'
> 
> > 7. copy new bzImage to floppy and /boot
> >
> > Where does 'depmod -a' fit into this sequence?  Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Hidong
> >
> 
> --
> MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
> --Axalon



Re: [newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

1999-12-29 Thread Hidong Kim

John Aldrich wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Hidong Kim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are there any known problems with kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and smp?  I
> > recompiled the smp kernel using the kernel-source and kernel-headers
> > RPMs from the Mandrake 6.1 installation CD, and now the machine won't
> > boot.  It hangs at "Finding module dependencies".  A up 2.2.13-7mdk
> > kernel boots fine.  Thanks,
> >
> You need to run "depmod -a" to re-do the module dependancies for the
> new kernel and install 'em in the config files.
> John


Hi, John,

Thanks for the reply.  When do I do 'depmod -a'?  Here's the sequence of
commands I use to compile a kernel:

1. make mrproper
2. make xconfig
3. make dep
4. make bzImage
5. make modules
6. make modules_install
7. copy new bzImage to floppy and /boot

Where does 'depmod -a' fit into this sequence?  Thanks,



Hidong



[newbie] smp kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and modules

1999-12-28 Thread Hidong Kim

Hi,

Are there any known problems with kernel 2.2.13-7mdk and smp?  I
recompiled the smp kernel using the kernel-source and kernel-headers
RPMs from the Mandrake 6.1 installation CD, and now the machine won't
boot.  It hangs at "Finding module dependencies".  A up 2.2.13-7mdk
kernel boots fine.  Thanks,



Hidong



Re: [newbie] SMP question

1999-12-14 Thread phins13

Robert Weider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Does anyone know which kernal do I need to upgrade to
>via rpm upgrade or compile to support a smp system? 
>TIA 
>Robert
>
>__
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
>Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
I'm not 100% sure, but doesn't the kernel that comes with 
the new Mandrake release support SMP. Try installing the 
kernel headers and source RPM that come with the Mandrake 6.1
distribution. From your command line:
cd /usr/src/linux
make xconfig

>From here you should be able to choose the options you want
in your kernel. I believe you will find an SMP option. 
Then:
make dep
make bzImage
make modules
make modules_install
make install

Make sure to change your lilo.conf file to include your
new and old kernel just in case your new compilation of
the kernel doesn't work.
Good Luck.
SA
--
Do you do Linux? :)
Get your FREE @linuxstart.com email address at: http://www.linuxstart.com



Re: [newbie] SMP question

1999-12-13 Thread John Aldrich

On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, you wrote:
> Does anyone know which kernal do I need to upgrade to
> via rpm upgrade or compile to support a smp system? 
> TIA 
> Robert
> 
an SMP kernel, obviously. :-) They are marked as
"kernel--smp.mdk.i586.rpm" or something similar. It's
pretty obvious which RPMs are smp kernels already. 
Also, ANY kernel you hand-compile is capable of SMP. It's
one of the config options which come up during the
config/menuconfig/xconfig
John



[newbie] SMP question

1999-12-13 Thread Mike Fieschko

>>> "Robert" == Robert Weider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Robert> Does anyone know which kernal do I need to upgrade to via
Robert> rpm upgrade or compile to support a smp system?  TIA

This is a shot in the dark, but how about

kernel-smp-2.2.13-7mdk.i586.rpm

or

kernel-smp-fb-2.2.13-7mdk.i586.rpm

at

rpmfind.net:/linux/Mandrake/6.1/Mandrake/RPMS

you might want to grab the kernel-headers-2.2.13-7mdk.i586.rpm and
kernel-source-2.2.13-7mdk.i586.rpm from the same site.  

-- 
Mike Fieschko, West Orange, NJ, USA
X-Mailer: XEmacs 21.1, VM 6.75 and random-sig.el
Kernel 2.2.14-1mdk
http://www.viconet.com/fieschko/home.htm
Dec 12 Third Sunday of Advent
"Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our
ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to
submit to that arrogant oligarchy who merely happen to be walking
around." - [G.K. Chesterton, in Orthodoxy, 1908]



[newbie] SMP question

1999-12-12 Thread Robert Weider


Does anyone know which kernal do I need to upgrade to
via rpm upgrade or compile to support a smp system? 
TIA 
Robert

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com



Re: [newbie] smp questions

1999-11-17 Thread Ronald J. Yacketta

pete moss wrote:
> 
> i have in mind doing some system hardware upgrades, one of the things
> that i am thinking about upgrading is my processor.  i currently have a
> PII 350.  my motherboard can support up to a 450.  i am also considering
> getting a smp motherboard and a second chip.  is there a good cheap
> motherboard that supports this, as well as agp, isa, and pci?  do the
> two processors need to be the same speed?  also, is there a better place
> to compare prices than cnet.com?
> 
> tia
> :P
BP6 with dual celeron 300's is what I use



Re: [newbie] smp questions

1999-11-17 Thread Singer XJ Wang



On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Singer XJ Wang wrote:

> For a Duel Processing System, I recommend the Asus P2B-D or P2B-DS
> Mothboard. It uses an Intel 440BX Chipset, UDMA-33 Connectors, 4xDIMM
> Sockets [up to 1 Gig]. AGP, blah. The DS also has an U2W [80MB/s] SCSI
> Connectors build on.
> 
> Why am I recommending this?
> 
> Well, at this lab in the university here we run the following:
> Duel PIII-500's
> Asus P2B-D
> 12GIG UDMA HDDs (Quantum)
> 
> and we use LINUX RedHat (sorry, Mandrake but Guassian98 requires RedHat)
> and this Gaussian98 program runs up to two weeks for one execution for us
> and it wil keep both procesors loaded at 100% 99% of that time and during
> our 2 month of use with that thing, we have had no problems
> 

Sorry about the bellow TOP Dump, accident.

Flamers - Yeah, I know the P2Bs are expensive, but they are wort it.

>   PID USER PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT  LIB %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
>  5879 wang  17   0 19512  19M 19288 R   0 99.9  3.7  36:27
> l703.exe
>  5971 wang  17   0 19508  19M 19284 R   0 99.2  3.7   1:25
> l703.exe
>  5972 root   1   0  1036 1036   836 R   0  0.7  0.2   0:00 top   
> On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Jeanette Russo wrote:
> 
> > Seth Gibson wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> > > > two processors need to be the same speed?  also, is there a better place
> > > > to compare prices than cnet.com?
> > > I would give pricewatch.com a shot.  They have smp boards for as low as 69 but
> > > that might not necessarily be your best bet.  If you're looking for a certain
> > > board i'd check pricewatch for it tho.  Good Luck!
> > 
> > Yes SMP processors must be the same speed.
> > Jeanette
> > 
> 
> 



Re: [newbie] smp questions

1999-11-17 Thread Jeanette Russo

Seth Gibson wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> > two processors need to be the same speed?  also, is there a better place
> > to compare prices than cnet.com?
> I would give pricewatch.com a shot.  They have smp boards for as low as 69 but
> that might not necessarily be your best bet.  If you're looking for a certain
> board i'd check pricewatch for it tho.  Good Luck!

Yes SMP processors must be the same speed.
Jeanette



Re: [newbie] smp questions

1999-11-17 Thread Simon Norris

I would also add to the other coments here that cheap is not good. I have a
friend here who swears by the prices of PCChips boards, and then swears at
them when he comes to set them up!!!

My personal recommendation is ABIT, they work very well, and don't use
jumpers. The setup is virtually automatic, so is very easy. And they usually
support AGP, PCI, and ISA, although newer boards have less ISA slots than
most people would like. Oh, and they are an overclockers dream, as you can
tweak speeds and voltage settings through the GUI. It only takes a quick
reset on the motherboard if you totally screw things up. And they are only
usually 10-20 pounds dearer than the cheaper ones.

I believe the processors can be different speeds, but the faster one will be
brought down to the speed of the slower one, so it's a bit pointless.

I can't recommend any prices matching places, as I've always found something
that is apparently cheap, gone to one of the supposedly more expensive
websites, and found they've matched the price with free delivery! There's no
better way than actually doing the legwork and checking out what they have
directly.
- Original Message -
From: pete moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 4:07 AM
Subject: [newbie] smp questions


i have in mind doing some system hardware upgrades, one of the things
that i am thinking about upgrading is my processor.  i currently have a
PII 350.  my motherboard can support up to a 450.  i am also considering
getting a smp motherboard and a second chip.  is there a good cheap
motherboard that supports this, as well as agp, isa, and pci?  do the
two processors need to be the same speed?  also, is there a better place
to compare prices than cnet.com?

tia
:P




Re: [newbie] smp questions

1999-11-16 Thread Benjamin Montgomery

without a more info about your setup it is hard to say a whole lot. Do some
research on the motherboard you own, check out the manufacturer's specs and
see what processors they say they support (types and speeds). If you want to
do SMP buying a "cheap" motherboard is probably not a smart idea. Again, do
some research and find a board that others are reporting success with. Yes,
you want to have the same processors on the board (some even say that
getting processors from the same production batch give you better
performance). Check out http://www.tomshardware.com
I like to compare prices at http://www.pricewatch.com


> i have in mind doing some system hardware upgrades, one of the things
> that i am thinking about upgrading is my processor.  i currently have a
> PII 350.  my motherboard can support up to a 450.  i am also considering
> getting a smp motherboard and a second chip.  is there a good cheap
> motherboard that supports this, as well as agp, isa, and pci?  do the
> two processors need to be the same speed?  also, is there a better place
> to compare prices than cnet.com?
>
> tia
> :P



Re: [newbie] smp questions

1999-11-16 Thread Seth Gibson

On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> two processors need to be the same speed?  also, is there a better place
> to compare prices than cnet.com?
I would give pricewatch.com a shot.  They have smp boards for as low as 69 but
that might not necessarily be your best bet.  If you're looking for a certain
board i'd check pricewatch for it tho.  Good Luck!



[newbie] smp questions

1999-11-16 Thread pete moss

i have in mind doing some system hardware upgrades, one of the things
that i am thinking about upgrading is my processor.  i currently have a
PII 350.  my motherboard can support up to a 450.  i am also considering
getting a smp motherboard and a second chip.  is there a good cheap
motherboard that supports this, as well as agp, isa, and pci?  do the
two processors need to be the same speed?  also, is there a better place
to compare prices than cnet.com?

tia
:P



RE: [newbie] SMP + OT DSL Question

1999-10-29 Thread yacketta



From: Ronald A. Yacketta

I found it on the linuxmandrake site .




mshirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/28/99 12:54:51 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:(bcc: Ronald A. Yacketta/958157/EKC)
Subject:  RE: [newbie] SMP + OT DSL Question




Incedentally, where's this BP6 SMP article that started this thread?
My next computer's gonna be a BP6/300A setup.

-Original Message-
From: Seth Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SMP + OT DSL Question


On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
> sorry if I sound stupid here, but BP6???
>
The ABit mobo that supports dual celerons. . .anybody else heard the rumor
that intel is going to start diasbling SMP capability in PPGA Celerons too?
I
read that somewhere. . .Hopefully AMD wont follow that path with the Athlon
Selects. . .

Now for the OT DSL Question(:  Im getting DSL with a static IP and im
running a
DSL box into a NIC.  So basically do i just need to configure eth0 for
normal
operation and then connect the DSL box to the NIC?  Thanks all!

  --

Seth Gibson
www.mp3.com/PSM0x2710
members.tripod.com/cybernetic_thunder (Under Construction)
Aggression Takes Its Toll.









RE: [newbie] SMP + OT DSL Question

1999-10-28 Thread mshirley

Incedentally, where's this BP6 SMP article that started this thread?
My next computer's gonna be a BP6/300A setup.

-Original Message-
From: Seth Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] SMP + OT DSL Question


On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
> sorry if I sound stupid here, but BP6???
> 
The ABit mobo that supports dual celerons. . .anybody else heard the rumor
that intel is going to start diasbling SMP capability in PPGA Celerons too?
I
read that somewhere. . .Hopefully AMD wont follow that path with the Athlon
Selects. . .

Now for the OT DSL Question(:  Im getting DSL with a static IP and im
running a
DSL box into a NIC.  So basically do i just need to configure eth0 for
normal
operation and then connect the DSL box to the NIC?  Thanks all!

  --

Seth Gibson
www.mp3.com/PSM0x2710
members.tripod.com/cybernetic_thunder (Under Construction)
Aggression Takes Its Toll.



Re: [newbie] SMP

1999-10-28 Thread John Aldrich

On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
> 
> sorry if I sound stupid here, but BP6???
> 
Motherboard model
John



Re: [newbie] SMP + OT DSL Question

1999-10-28 Thread Seth Gibson

On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
> sorry if I sound stupid here, but BP6???
> 
The ABit mobo that supports dual celerons. . .anybody else heard the rumor
that intel is going to start diasbling SMP capability in PPGA Celerons too?  I
read that somewhere. . .Hopefully AMD wont follow that path with the Athlon
Selects. . .

Now for the OT DSL Question(:  Im getting DSL with a static IP and im running a
DSL box into a NIC.  So basically do i just need to configure eth0 for normal
operation and then connect the DSL box to the NIC?  Thanks all!

  --

Seth Gibson
www.mp3.com/PSM0x2710
members.tripod.com/cybernetic_thunder (Under Construction)
Aggression Takes Its Toll.



Re: [newbie] SMP

1999-10-28 Thread yacketta



From: Ronald A. Yacketta

sorry if I sound stupid here, but BP6???




Steve Philp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/27/99 07:21:55 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Ronald A. Yacketta/958157/EKC)
Subject:  Re: [newbie] SMP




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
>
> FYI:
> that little article on mandrakes site regarding SMP (with dual celeron's)
> is awsome!
> I followed it to the "T" and it worked.. kick butt ;)


Welcome to the BP6 club!

--
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]









Re: [newbie] SMP

1999-10-27 Thread Steve Philp

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> From: Ronald A. Yacketta
> 
> FYI:
> that little article on mandrakes site regarding SMP (with dual celeron's)
> is awsome!
> I followed it to the "T" and it worked.. kick butt ;)


Welcome to the BP6 club!  

-- 
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [newbie] SMP troubles

1999-10-19 Thread John Aldrich

On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> Why do i get an error message everytime I try to recompile some program
> that uses SMP (Symmetric Multi-Processing)?  For example, I am trying to
> install VMware's Emulator on my Linux Machine (Mandrake 6.1, kernel
> version 2.2.13-7mdk) and when I invoke their install script, it gives me
> the following error message...
> 
> -  Begin Error -
> 
> What is the location of the directory of C header files that match your
> running kernel?
> [/usr/src/linux/include]?   <--- I accept the default and it shoudl be
> correct...
> 
> The directory of kernel headers (version 2.2.13-7mdk) does not match
> your running kernel (version 2.2.13-7mdksmp).  Consequently, even if the
> compilation of the module was successful, the module would not load into
> the running kernel.
> 
Hmm...that's wierd... Are there any options, such as " -- nodeps" to
make it work Dunno what the problem is. That's really wierd. Have
you tried the SMP list? It's at [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can
subscribe to it or just send a message (I'm subbed to it myself...)
John



[newbie] SMP troubles

1999-10-19 Thread john may

Why do i get an error message everytime I try to recompile some program
that uses SMP (Symmetric Multi-Processing)?  For example, I am trying to
install VMware's Emulator on my Linux Machine (Mandrake 6.1, kernel
version 2.2.13-7mdk) and when I invoke their install script, it gives me
the following error message...

-  Begin Error -

What is the location of the directory of C header files that match your
running kernel?
[/usr/src/linux/include]?   <--- I accept the default and it shoudl be
correct...

The directory of kernel headers (version 2.2.13-7mdk) does not match
your running kernel (version 2.2.13-7mdksmp).  Consequently, even if the
compilation of the module was successful, the module would not load into
the running kernel.

- End Eror -

Did Mandrake drop the ball on this, or is there something I am missing.
I have all the kernel source installed and it is in
/usr/src/linux/include.  Anybody else run into problems on an
SMP machine?  Help please.  I would have posted this to VMware, but i
have noticed the same problem with several packages while trying to
build and SMP version.  I ran into a similar problem while just trying
to recompile a new kernel..

-- John



RE: [newbie] SMP kernel problems on PPro

1999-08-26 Thread John Aldrich

On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, you wrote:
> 
> take the kernel-2.2-i686-smp.config from the kernel SRPM, change the 
> cpu to a Ppro and see if that works.. 
> 
Ahh...recompile. :-) I was kinda hoping to avoid that, but
I guess it's inevitable *sigh* Oh, well. :-)
Thanks...
John



RE: [newbie] SMP kernel problems on PPro

1999-08-25 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, John Aldrich wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, you wrote:
> > 
> > I've got dual PII's and have booted successfully with 2.2.9-19mdksmp,
> > 2.2.9-27mdksmp, and 2.2.11
> > The system is: Micronics Helios board(440BX) + AHA2940UW.
> > 
> > scott
> > 
> Yeah...I figured it was probably fine for P II / P III, but PPro is
> a different beast altogether. Although it may be more of a
> motherboard problem. The motherboard is a Micronics W6-LI w/ 192 Megs
> of RAM and only one IDE device (my boot drive.)
>   John

take the kernel-2.2-i686-smp.config from the kernel SRPM, change the 
cpu to a Ppro and see if that works.. 

--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



RE: [newbie] SMP kernel problems on PPro

1999-08-25 Thread sw

John wrote:

On 25-Aug-99 John Aldrich wrote:
> My tech helped me fix one problem (booting from the IDE vs SCSI --
> turns out there was an option in BIOS I hadn't seen to tell the BIOS
> which device to boot from.)
> However, there's a more troubling and less easily fixed (afaik)
> problem with the kernel: If I try to boot from the SMP kernel so I
> can actually USE the second processor, it locks up trying to scan the
> IDE bus. However, if I boot "linux-up" at the LILO prompt, it boots
> just fine.
> 
> Does anyone know if the newer kernel solves this problem?
> Thanks...
>   John

John,

I've got dual PII's and have booted successfully with 2.2.9-19mdksmp,
2.2.9-27mdksmp, and 2.2.11
The system is: Micronics Helios board(440BX) + AHA2940UW.

scott

--
E-Mail: sw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25-Aug-99
Time: 20:11:01

This message was sent by XFMail
--



[newbie] SMP kernel problems on PPro

1999-08-25 Thread John Aldrich

My tech helped me fix one problem (booting from the IDE vs SCSI --
turns out there was an option in BIOS I hadn't seen to tell the BIOS
which device to boot from.)
However, there's a more troubling and less easily fixed (afaik)
problem with the kernel: If I try to boot from the SMP kernel so I
can actually USE the second processor, it locks up trying to scan the
IDE bus. However, if I boot "linux-up" at the LILO prompt, it boots
just fine.

Does anyone know if the newer kernel solves this problem?
Thanks...
John



Re: [newbie] smp questions

1999-01-15 Thread Axalon Bloodstone



On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Jeanette Russo wrote:

> Seth Gibson wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> > > two processors need to be the same speed?  also, is there a better place
> > > to compare prices than cnet.com?
> > I would give pricewatch.com a shot.  They have smp boards for as low as 69 but
> > that might not necessarily be your best bet.  If you're looking for a certain
> > board i'd check pricewatch for it tho.  Good Luck!
> 
> Yes SMP processors must be the same speed.
> Jeanette

Not so with the abit BP6