Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-10 Thread BJ Tracy
On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:05 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
> On Thursday 09 September 2004 06:49 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
>
>  ALL : 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.102 192.168.0.103 192.168.104
>
> Sorry, I left out that the above line should be in your
>
> /etc/hosts.allow
Thanks for your help.  Still not there yet but will work on it over the 
weekend.
bj


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-10 Thread BJ Tracy
On Friday 10 September 2004 09:24 am, Ryan Steffes wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:05:31 -0700, Erylon Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 September 2004 06:49 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
> >
> >  ALL : 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.102 192.168.0.103 192.168.104
> >
> > Sorry, I left out that the above line should be in your
> >
> > /etc/hosts.allow
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> > Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
> > 
>
> Just wanted to point out that strictly speaking passwords aren't required.
Thanks for your help.  Still not there yet, will be working it out over the 
weekend.
bj


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-10 Thread Ryan Steffes
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:05:31 -0700, Erylon Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 09 September 2004 06:49 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:
> 
>  ALL : 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.102 192.168.0.103 192.168.104
> 
> Sorry, I left out that the above line should be in your
> 
> /etc/hosts.allow
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
> 
> 
> 
> 

Just wanted to point out that strictly speaking passwords aren't required.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread Erylon Hines
On Thursday 09 September 2004 06:49 pm, Erylon Hines wrote:

 ALL : 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.102 192.168.0.103 192.168.104

Sorry, I left out that the above line should be in your

/etc/hosts.allow



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread Erylon Hines
On Thursday 09 September 2004 11:00 am, BJ Tracy wrote:
| Hello All,
|
| This is strange.  In my office I still have 2 pc's with MS on them.  My
| laptop and my pc have Mandrake 10.0 and all are set up on my LAN.
|
| Both, my laptop and my pc can see all the files and hard drives on the MS
| pc's,  however my laptop cannot see my pc and my pc cannot see my laptop.  
| They use to see each other.
|
| I have gone thru all the settings and everything seems to set correctly.
|
| Not sure why this is the way it is now.  I must be missing something.
|
| Please advise and Thanks to all of you for your help.
| bj
| fyi - I have looked in drakxservices and there is smb
| running.  This is the only one that is there.  Is that correct?

Samba needs to have users and passwords configured.  

The  users for your Win boxes must be identical, and have an identical 
password to the samba users on the Linux boxes.  The Win boxes also have to 
belong to the same "WORKGROUP" as the Linux boxes, identified in 

your /etc/samba/smb.conf 

From here on, do everything as root.

/etc/samba/smbusers 
needs to be written in the format you see inside--this is mine

Unix_name = SMB_erylon SMB_hilary SMB_sarah SMB_eldon
root = administrator admin
nobody = guest pcguest smbguest

The samba password needs to be set (in a console, as root)

smbpasswd -a erylon

would make one for me.

Make one for each user (avoid hassles, just use the user system login 
password)

/etc/samba/lmhosts gives samba a "roadmap" to IP/computer names of network 
machines.

127.0.0.1  localhost
192.168.0.101 BoxName1
192.168.0.102 BoxName2
192.168.0.103 BoxName3
etc

Don't eliminate the 127.xx localhost entry.  

 Add all 4 of your networked machines.

/etc/hosts allows remote hosts to be identified by the samba box.
The convention is:

127.0.0.1   localhost.localdomain localhost
192.168.0.101 BoxName1.workgroup_name
192.168.0.102 BoxName2.workgroup_name

The localhost entry is required.Add an entry for each box on your network 
(there are easier ways, but this always works)

This allows specific addresses to access the samba machine.

This is the way I do mine, there are others, but this is secure enough for me, 
and simple.  On a small network an IP for each machine here is no problem.  
On a large network you might want to us a range of addresses.

ALL : 192.168.0.101 192.168.0.102 192.168.0.103 192.168.104 

You probably want to configure your /etc/samba/smb.conf file to allow a share 
on your Linux boxes  I make a directory /home/public (directories under /home 
can be easily made into a share) and give it world permissions: 
#mkdir /home/public 
#chmod 2777 /home/public.  
With msec enabled (which it is by default), you'll have to jump through some 
hoops or it will change the permissions on you (I disable msec because I know 
what permissions I want on directories and msec irritates me to no end).

The entry for the share in the smb.conf file would look something like this:

[Public]
comment = public folder
path = /home/public
admin users = @workgroup_name
write list = @workgroup_name
force group = @workgroup_name
read only = No
inherit permissions = Yes
guest ok = Yes

Of course, substitute your actual machine names, workgroup name, user names, 
and actual ethernet addresses for each box in the above examples.  If you 
have a firewall you must open ports 137,138,139.

hth

e





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread Ryan Steffes
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:40:19 -0400, BJ Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 09 September 2004 04:18 pm, Ryan Steffes wrote:
> SNIP
> > What does the following give you:
> >
> > 1)
> > cat /etc/hosts.allow
> > cat /etc/hosts.deny
> SNIP
>  hosts.allow   This file describes the names of the hosts which are
> #   allowed to use the local INET services, as decided
> #   by the '/usr/sbin/tcpd' server.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]$ cat hosts.deny
> #
> # hosts.denyThis file describes the names of the hosts which are
> #   *not* allowed to use the local INET services, as decided
> #   by the '/usr/sbin/tcpd' server.
> #
> # The portmap line is redundant, but it is left to remind you that
> # the new secure portmap uses hosts.deny and hosts.allow.  In particular
> # you should know that NFS uses portmap!
> > 2)
> > Then look in "/var/log/samba2/"  You'll probably need to be superuser.
> >  With some luck, you'll have files there with the name of your other
> > PCs.  Check the ends of these files for obvious error messages.  If
> > nothing jumps out as bad, continue on.
> SNIP
> No samba2 file just samba.
> 
> Samba name server LOCALHOST is now a local master browser for workgroup
> MDKGROUP on subnet 192.168.1.102
> 
> I don't know where this came from "msdter browser"  and I did not set up the
> MDKGROUP.  However that is what MS-02 sees when it looks at the network.
> 
> I feel this is WAY over my head.  I cannot look at the other files the command
> cat log.198.168.1.103 doesn't do anything.
> > Back down a level to "/var/log/"  Find the IP address and names of
> > your other computers.  Try the following:
> SNIP
> Cannot get the next thing you asked about using grep to do anything except
> freeze up.
> Thanks for your help,
> BJ
> 
> 
> > grep "192.168.0.XXX" *<--- Insert the address here, you'll
> > get a lot probably, look for something along the lines of connection
> > refused or rejected.
> > grep "MS-01" *  < Ditto for real names here
> >
> > 3)
> > If you don't see anything obvious, holler back cause aside from that,
> > it's time to delve into your smb.conf  (probably in
> > /etc/samba2/smb.conf)


Ok, simple hope it works solution: Tell your WinXP box to join the
workgroup MDKGROUP.

Better solution:
I'm thinking you may be greatly served by a software package called
'Webmin' which is available through urpmi (rpmdrake/Mandrake Software
Center).  I remember it as being a pretty easy way to configure your
samba server.  drakwizard has a wizard for samba, no clue on how good
it is.

If you want to learn solution:
Open /etc/samba/smb.conf in your favorite editor

find the line:

workgroup = MDKGROUP

change it to match whatever the winxp one has or whatever it is you
actually want it to be, and
/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb restart

  In Win98, go to (from memory, so improvise until you find it)
Network Settings -> Identification tap  and find the workgroup name
and change them to match the winxp settings.

The thing about samba is it SEEMS much harder to configure than it is.
 For just sharing files on your home network, you can ignore 90% of
the options.

Some other settings you probably want in your smb.conf

  map to guest = bad user
  security = user


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread BJ Tracy
On Thursday 09 September 2004 04:18 pm, Ryan Steffes wrote:
SNIP
> What does the following give you:
>
> 1)
> cat /etc/hosts.allow
> cat /etc/hosts.deny
SNIP
 hosts.allow   This file describes the names of the hosts which are
#   allowed to use the local INET services, as decided
#   by the '/usr/sbin/tcpd' server.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]$ cat hosts.deny
#
# hosts.denyThis file describes the names of the hosts which are
#   *not* allowed to use the local INET services, as decided
#   by the '/usr/sbin/tcpd' server.
#
# The portmap line is redundant, but it is left to remind you that
# the new secure portmap uses hosts.deny and hosts.allow.  In particular
# you should know that NFS uses portmap!
> 2)
> Then look in "/var/log/samba2/"  You'll probably need to be superuser.
>  With some luck, you'll have files there with the name of your other
> PCs.  Check the ends of these files for obvious error messages.  If
> nothing jumps out as bad, continue on.
SNIP
No samba2 file just samba.

Samba name server LOCALHOST is now a local master browser for workgroup 
MDKGROUP on subnet 192.168.1.102

I don't know where this came from "msdter browser"  and I did not set up the 
MDKGROUP.  However that is what MS-02 sees when it looks at the network.

I feel this is WAY over my head.  I cannot look at the other files the command  
cat log.198.168.1.103 doesn't do anything.
> Back down a level to "/var/log/"  Find the IP address and names of
> your other computers.  Try the following:
SNIP
Cannot get the next thing you asked about using grep to do anything except 
freeze up.
Thanks for your help,
BJ
> grep "192.168.0.XXX" *<--- Insert the address here, you'll
> get a lot probably, look for something along the lines of connection
> refused or rejected.
> grep "MS-01" *  < Ditto for real names here
>
> 3)
> If you don't see anything obvious, holler back cause aside from that,
> it's time to delve into your smb.conf  (probably in
> /etc/samba2/smb.conf)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread Ryan Steffes
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:58:56 -0400, BJ Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 09 September 2004 02:15 pm, Ryan Steffes wrote:
> > > > Both, my laptop and my pc can see all the files and hard drives on the
> > > > MS pc's,  however my laptop cannot see my pc and my pc cannot see my
> > > > laptop. They use to see each other.
> SNIP
> NO Firewall
> Sorry.
> 
> 
> 
> > and to clarify, when you mean "see" which tool do you mean?  Have you
> > tried pinging back and forth, and checked hosts.allow and hosts.deny?
> > Are you running a firewall?
> >
> > I'm also not entirely sure I'm reading you right.  You have four
> > computers?  We'll call them MS-01 and MS-02 as well as Laptop-MDK and
> > PC-MDK right?  Is this what you mean:
> >
> > Laptop-MDK can see MS-01 and MS-02
> > PC-MDK can see MS-01 and MS-02
> > MS-01 can see MS-02
> > MS-02 can see MS-01
> > MS-01 can see Laptop-MDK? PC-MDK?
> > MS-02 can see Laptop-MDK? PC-MDK?
> > Laptop-MDK can NOT see PC-MDK
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
> 
> 
> 
> 

What does the following give you:

1)
cat /etc/hosts.allow
cat /etc/hosts.deny

2)
Then look in "/var/log/samba2/"  You'll probably need to be superuser.
 With some luck, you'll have files there with the name of your other
PCs.  Check the ends of these files for obvious error messages.  If
nothing jumps out as bad, continue on.

Back down a level to "/var/log/"  Find the IP address and names of
your other computers.  Try the following:

grep "192.168.0.XXX" *<--- Insert the address here, you'll
get a lot probably, look for something along the lines of connection
refused or rejected.
grep "MS-01" *  < Ditto for real names here

3)
If you don't see anything obvious, holler back cause aside from that,
it's time to delve into your smb.conf  (probably in
/etc/samba2/smb.conf)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread BJ Tracy
On Thursday 09 September 2004 02:15 pm, Ryan Steffes wrote:
> > > Both, my laptop and my pc can see all the files and hard drives on the
> > > MS pc's,  however my laptop cannot see my pc and my pc cannot see my
> > > laptop. They use to see each other.
SNIP
NO Firewall
Sorry.

> and to clarify, when you mean "see" which tool do you mean?  Have you
> tried pinging back and forth, and checked hosts.allow and hosts.deny?
> Are you running a firewall?
>
> I'm also not entirely sure I'm reading you right.  You have four
> computers?  We'll call them MS-01 and MS-02 as well as Laptop-MDK and
> PC-MDK right?  Is this what you mean:
>
> Laptop-MDK can see MS-01 and MS-02
> PC-MDK can see MS-01 and MS-02
> MS-01 can see MS-02
> MS-02 can see MS-01
> MS-01 can see Laptop-MDK? PC-MDK?
> MS-02 can see Laptop-MDK? PC-MDK?
> Laptop-MDK can NOT see PC-MDK


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread BJ Tracy
On Thursday 09 September 2004 02:15 pm, Ryan Steffes wrote:
> > > Both, my laptop and my pc can see all the files and hard drives on the
> > > MS pc's,  however my laptop cannot see my pc and my pc cannot see my
> > > laptop. They use to see each other.
>
> and to clarify, when you mean "see" which tool do you mean?  Have you
> tried pinging back and forth, and checked hosts.allow and hosts.deny?
> Are you running a firewall?
Yes, I can ping everything.  Not sure what you mean by host.allow and 
hosts.deny.
Snip
> I'm also not entirely sure I'm reading you right.  You have four
> computers?  We'll call them MS-01 and MS-02 as well as Laptop-MDK and
> PC-MDK right?  Is this what you mean:
Yes, that is corrrect.
Snip
> Laptop-MDK can see MS-01 and MS-02
> PC-MDK can see MS-01 and MS-02
> MS-01 can see MS-02
> MS-02 can see MS-01
Yes
Snip
MS-01(XP) cannot see MDK's
MS-02(98) can see MS-01 and PC-MDK
Snip
> Laptop-MDK can NOT see PC-MDK
Correct
Thanks,
bj


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread Ryan Steffes
> > Both, my laptop and my pc can see all the files and hard drives on the MS
> > pc's,  however my laptop cannot see my pc and my pc cannot see my laptop.
> > They use to see each other.
> >

and to clarify, when you mean "see" which tool do you mean?  Have you
tried pinging back and forth, and checked hosts.allow and hosts.deny? 
Are you running a firewall?

I'm also not entirely sure I'm reading you right.  You have four
computers?  We'll call them MS-01 and MS-02 as well as Laptop-MDK and
PC-MDK right?  Is this what you mean:

Laptop-MDK can see MS-01 and MS-02 
PC-MDK can see MS-01 and MS-02 
MS-01 can see MS-02
MS-02 can see MS-01
MS-01 can see Laptop-MDK? PC-MDK?
MS-02 can see Laptop-MDK? PC-MDK?
Laptop-MDK can NOT see PC-MDK


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread Ryan Steffes
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:00:09 -0400, BJ Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
> 
> This is strange.  In my office I still have 2 pc's with MS on them.  My laptop
> and my pc have Mandrake 10.0 and all are set up on my LAN.
> 
> Both, my laptop and my pc can see all the files and hard drives on the MS
> pc's,  however my laptop cannot see my pc and my pc cannot see my laptop.  
> They use to see each other.
> 
> I have gone thru all the settings and everything seems to set correctly.
> 
> Not sure why this is the way it is now.  I must be missing something.
> 
> Please advise and Thanks to all of you for your help.
> bj
> fyi - I have looked in drakxservices and there is smb
> 
> 
> running.  This is the only one that is there.  Is that correct?
> 

Out of curiousity, are they both set to try and be master?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread BJ Tracy
On Thursday 09 September 2004 09:45 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
SNIP
> > Both, my laptop and my pc can see all the files and hard drives on the MS
> > pc's,  however my laptop cannot see my pc and my pc cannot see my laptop.
> > They use to see each other.
> > I have gone thru all the settings and everything seems to set correctly.
> > Not sure why this is the way it is now.  I must be missing something.
> > Please advise and Thanks to all of you for your help.
> > bj
Snip
> It sounds like you do not have samba server runnng.
> Samba comes in 2 parts. Samba client allows you to see other computers, and
> samba server allows them to see you.
>
> Check drakxservices and if samba refuses to start check the logs.
SNIP
Thanks for your reply,  I have looked in drakxservices and there is smb 
running.  This is the only one that is there.  Is that correct?
I have never run the logs,  which option do I use?
Thanks, bj
> If samba is running, then check you do not have a firewall in place.
> Ports 137,138,139 need to be open for samba.
>
> derek


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Question

2004-09-09 Thread Derek Jennings
On Thursday 09 September 2004 13:56, BJ Tracy wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is strange.  In my office I still have 2 pc's with MS on them.  My
> laptop and my pc have Mandrake 10.0 and all are set up on my LAN.
>
> Both, my laptop and my pc can see all the files and hard drives on the MS
> pc's,  however my laptop cannot see my pc and my pc cannot see my laptop.
> They use to see each other.
>
> I have gone thru all the settings and everything seems to set correctly.
>
> Not sure why this is the way it is now.  I must be missing something.
>
> Please advise and Thanks to all of you for your help.
> bj

It sounds like you do not have samba server runnng.
Samba comes in 2 parts. Samba client allows you to see other computers, and 
samba server allows them to see you.

Check drakxservices and if samba refuses to start check the logs.

If samba is running, then check you do not have a firewall in place.
Ports 137,138,139 need to be open for samba.

derek

-- 
www.jennings.homelinux.net
http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN problems ...

2004-07-28 Thread Charlie Mahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On July 28, 2004 23:02:11, J Latham wrote:
> Hi All ...
>
> This past weekend I "built" my first computer ... A nervewracking
> experience for a newbie but I'm pleased to say nearly everything went
> smoothly (and was easier than expected - esp with Mandrake 10.0 - Took a
> few attempts to get WinXP loaded).  The only problem now is that I can't
> get the onboard network card to work with Mandrake 10.0 ... Here are some
> specs:
>
> Mobo: MSI K8N Neo Platinum
> Chipset: nVIDIA nForce3 250Gb
> CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3000+
> LAN controller: same as chipset note (nVIDIA nForce3 250Gb controller)
>
> When I run the Network config tool in MCC it fails to recognize the onboard
> LAN at all and instead asks me to make a "manual choice."  But none of the
> choices I tried seem to work.  (I tried "nvnet" for example but it just
> brought me back to the manual choice prompt - as did the 2 or 3 other
> listings I tried.)
>
> I tried installing a PCI Linksys Etherfast card, too, and the config tool
> found the card and went through the setup process without errors but I
> still haven't got a working network connection ...

I've done this the easy way for so long that it's hard to remember the pain I 
once had with Linksys cards. Set harddrake to run at boot, plug in the card 
and you'll likely find you'll have a connection next time you boot to 
Mandrake. Alternatively, plug in the card and insert install disk one and 
"Upgrade" the install. At the summary screen be certain you configure 
anything that hasn't already been done by the installer.

As I said, the easy way. There's a link below if you'd like to take a swing at 
things another way.

> Finally, I use a Linksys cable/DSL router to connect to my ADSL connection
> ... The router is configured properly as I'm using it to connect now thru
> WinXP, and it also works with another box I have running Mandrake ...
>
> I'm not sure what other info is needed to troubleshoot this so please let
> me know what else I need to provide ...
>
> Any and all help is appreciated ...
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Adam

The linked article might help. Since you have Internet access through Windows 
you can download any drivers from NVidia that you may require.

http://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/nforce/1.0-0256/ReleaseNotes_Linux_nForce_1.0-0256.html

That article is an old one and the driver versions aren't current but the 
information is still valid.

Good luck;
Charlie
- -- 
Edmonton,AB,Canada User #244963 at http://counter.li.org
Mandrakelinux release 10.1 (Alpha 1) for i586 kernel 2.6.8-0.rc2.2mdk
23:51:10 up 9:23, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.12, 0.12
"Life sucks, but it's better than the alternative."
- -- Peter da Silva
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBCJKTZqvqlrLPr5YRAu3LAKCjEk0b21VFdnqZpbHzpki7tffTcQCeLqkN
q56J3yqWsAR8ieJBD7o2ARE=
=5v/V
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] LAN problems ...

2004-07-28 Thread Rob Blomquist
On Wednesday 28 July 2004 10:02 pm, J Latham wrote:
> Hi All ...
>
> This past weekend I "built" my first computer ... A nervewracking
> experience for a newbie but I'm pleased to say nearly everything went
> smoothly (and was easier than expected - esp with Mandrake 10.0 - Took a
> few attempts to get WinXP loaded).  The only problem now is that I can't
> get the onboard network card to work with Mandrake 10.0 ... Here are some
> specs:
>
> Mobo: MSI K8N Neo Platinum
> Chipset: nVIDIA nForce3 250Gb
> CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3000+
> LAN controller: same as chipset note (nVIDIA nForce3 250Gb controller)

Its all about the Nforce3 controller. There is no Open Source driver yet, but 
NVidia has released theirs: 
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_nforce_1.0-0275

Let us know how it works. When I got my Nforce2 mobo it was only one release 
to an open source driver, and happyness.

Rob

-- 

Linux Desktop user since 2000,
Home networker since shortly after.

Linux User #183693
http://counter.li.org/


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



RE: [newbie] LAN Write permission

2004-02-22 Thread Simon Kitching
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 04:17, Kasper Thunoe wrote:
>  
> > -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af martin brandt
> > Sendt: 20. februar 2004 21:24
> > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Emne: Re: [newbie] LAN Write permission
> > 
> > Quoting "H.J.Bathoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 
> > > On Friday 20 February 2004 19:52, martin brandt wrote:
> > > > Hey everyone,
> > > > Im running Mandrake 9.2.
> > > > Ive just got a windows2000 comp onto my network and i want to be 
> > > > able to put files onto my mandrake comp via the network. 
> > I can read 
> > > > files from my shared directory on home, but i cannot 
> > delete or write 
> > > > new ones onto the disc. What settings do i have to change?
> > > > I have tried to log on as root via windows but it doesnt 
> > recognise the pw.
> > > >
> > > > Also, is there anyway to share files from directories 
> > other than home?!
> > > For
> > > > example my windows partition?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks all, your help is appreciated, Martin Brandt

It is definitely possible to access any directory your windows machine
shares.

I'm not sure this is the *easiest* way to set it up, but the following
works for me.

In /etc/fstab, I have the following entry:

# network drives
//host/dir /mnt/somedir smbfs credentials=/etc/samba/auth 0 0

And file /etc/samba/auth holds:
username = simon
domain =
password = mypasswd

With this setup, the windows share is mounted on boot. I can read the
mounted dir as any user, but can only write to it as user "root". I'm
sure that samba provides options to allow writing as normal users, which
is what you want. I just haven't needed to set it up that way.

Cheers,

Simon



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN Write permission

2004-02-20 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 20 February 2004 21:24, martin brandt wrote:
>  I'll try that prog. but it doesnt sound like exactly what I need. I need
> to be able to dl to the linux directory, so for example, select that
> directory as the download destination on Bit Torrent. I think its possible
> on windows <--> Windows, is there a way to do it on linux <--> windows?
>
> Thanks for your help so far, Martin Brandt

Bittorrent is a different story but dloading to remote directories isn't hard 
using putty from windows...Once you're logged in you have full access to the 
bash-shell.
Make yourself su/root and do whatever you like. You run the remote-linux PC by 
being in/on it and can tell it what to do whatever you like.
It will require a fair amount of command-line knowledge though:)

Something similar but then gui fashion can be gotten from using VNC...but 
that's a lot slower and crash-prone in my experience.
Either way you take full control of the remote PC.

Going from linux -> windows (I'm talking 98 here) is a bit more of a hassle 
though VNC can do it. If you want ssh-server options on your windows box 
you'll need to install "cygwin" or one of the derived lite versions. With 
cygwin you'll be able to run X remotely as well:)

Good luck,
HarM
-- 
Registered Linux User #197998
FSF Associate Member #901
ICQ #146191606
Mandrake HowTo's & more: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN not recognized on asus a7n8x-x MB

2003-11-09 Thread Rob Blomquist
On Friday 07 November 2003 8:03 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote:
> On Thursday 06 November 2003 12:29 pm, gt wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > I am one of those really really newbees you keep hearing about that.
> > I am just trying out linux for the first time.
>
> 9.1 does not support the A7N8X mobo lan connection. 9.2 does. I own the
> same mobo, and was quite bummed that the LAN and Sound were not recognized
> until now. When I bought it, 9.0 was out.

Then I stand corrected. Maybe the in the upgrade from 9.0 to 9.1, I just 
didn't try to have it work, as my 3c509 NIC works great, and I have room for 
it on my machine.

Rob

-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN not recognized on asus a7n8x-x MB

2003-11-09 Thread L.V.Gandhi
On Saturday 08 Nov 2003 9:33 am, Rob Blomquist wrote:
> On Thursday 06 November 2003 12:29 pm, gt wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > I am one of those really really newbees you keep hearing about that.
> > I am just trying out linux for the first time.
>
> 9.1 does not support the A7N8X mobo lan connection. 9.2 does. I own the
> same mobo, and was quite bummed that the LAN and Sound were not recognized
> until now. When I bought it, 9.0 was out.
>
> I have not tried the sound, but the LAN showed up when I installed 9.2. I
> am not using it, but I could and relieve the PCI NIC I installed.
>
> I have been using Linux for 3+ years, and now take all these things in
> stride.
I have the same MB. 3com port is recognised with out any effort by 9.1. but to 
make it recognise nvidia nic port you need the nvidia rpm which is available 
from their site. I am using 3com port for connecting to adsl modem. It is ok.
Even after this I have one problem that the stock kernel doesn't recognise the 
hdds for udma5. Even manual setting is ineffective. Only new kernel helps.

-- 
L.V.Gandhi
203, Soundaryalahari Apartments, Lawsons Bay colony, Visakhapatnam, 530017
MECON, 5th Floor, RTC Complex, Visakhapatnam AP 530020 INDIA
http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN not recognized on asus a7n8x-x MB

2003-11-08 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 08 Nov 2003 4:03 am, Rob Blomquist wrote:
>
> 9.1 does not support the A7N8X mobo lan connection. 9.2 does.

But does it say so on the TWiki :-)  (I haven't checked)

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN not recognized on asus a7n8x-x MB

2003-11-07 Thread Rob Blomquist
On Thursday 06 November 2003 12:29 pm, gt wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I am one of those really really newbees you keep hearing about that.
> I am just trying out linux for the first time.

9.1 does not support the A7N8X mobo lan connection. 9.2 does. I own the same 
mobo, and was quite bummed that the LAN and Sound were not recognized until 
now. When I bought it, 9.0 was out.

I have not tried the sound, but the LAN showed up when I installed 9.2. I am 
not using it, but I could and relieve the PCI NIC I installed.

I have been using Linux for 3+ years, and now take all these things in stride.

Rob

-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN not recognized on asus a7n8x-x MB

2003-11-06 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thursday 06 November 2003 2:30 pm, gt wrote:
> thanks so much, i will give it a try right now (postponing all the things I
> really should be doing right now) :)
>
> Gideon
>
I have to slow down and give sensible answers, sorry Gideon. )-:

You'll probably need to sure you install the kernel source for the running 
version you have and since there were updates for 9.1 it's easiest to open a 
super user terminal and type:

urpmi kernel-source 

It should install the correct version and dependencies for you. If you haven't 
installed an update kernel yet do that first by leaving out the -source above 
then install the source. Then run 

lilo -v 

in the same terminal after you have installed the packages to have access to 
the new kernel and when that's all done type

reboot 

to use it.

I'm still too much in a hurry, sorry.

C.
- -- 
Edmonton,AB,Canada User 244963 at http://counter.li.org
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 kernel 2.4.22-21mdk
14:34:50 up 5 days, 23:13, 1 user, load average: 0.37, 0.30, 0.25
When God saw how faulty was man He tried again and made woman.  As to
why he then stopped there are two opinions.  One of them is woman's.
-- DeGourmont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/qr/1G11CaRuZZSIRAuqvAKCB5tvd268nlyb8VWQScRwFGE8PpACcCJkz
lTHv6HmMcq+DAoeN+8m+zyw=
=Qhqv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN problem

2003-11-03 Thread Rob Blomquist
On Monday 03 November 2003 3:50 am, Paul Kaplan wrote:
> I have a home network w/ MDK 9.1 and W2K using Samba.  Periodically, all
> the connections disappear.  (I haven't yet figured out what the trigger
> is.)  In order to get them back I have to re-stop the iptables service even
> though it is defaulted not to start when the host starts up.

Humm. I have a home network using NFS and Samba (whenever I get it running), 
but I never have such problems, at least with the connections disappearing. 
At least for NFS, they are always there.

I am caused to wonder however, about what you are doing with IP-Tables? On a 
home network, I don't see any reason to run it, unless you are fire walling 
the server with it. In that case, I would use another box, maybe a P-90 to be 
your firewall, and let the home side of the network be open to all.

Rob

-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN problem

2003-07-19 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Saturday 19 July 2003 12:09 pm, Paul Kaplan wrote:
> If I want to leave DHCP enabled so as to allow me to bring several
> computers from work home and connect them to my home LAN and move files
> around on the LAN, what are my "alternatives" to lmhosts on both the linux
> and win side? Paul

Paul, (sorry) I missed the first part of this thread. What is the problem? 
I've got a DLink model DL-604 router, for cable-modem service that I have 3 
comps hooked to. It does DHCP, handing out the IPs to the machines, but I've 
still got the IPs locked under Linux, and Windows just grabs them. I can ping 
by IP or hostname on all 3, and copy files via NFS or Samba, depending on 
which OS my sons are (dual) booted into. I don't dual boot but they do 
because of a few games.

-- 
  
  /\  
Dark>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN problem

2003-07-19 Thread Paul Kaplan
If I want to leave DHCP enabled so as to allow me to bring several computers 
from work home and connect them to my home LAN and move files around on the 
LAN, what are my "alternatives" to lmhosts on both the linux and win side?
Paul

On Saturday 19 July 2003 08:08 am, Lanman wrote:
> Paul; If your router is handing off DHCP addresses, and your PC's are using
> their lmhosts file to find each other, you'll run into problems every time
> the router hands out new IP addresses. Try logging into the router and
> disabling the DHCP service, or use IP adresses that are outside of the
> range of IP's that your DHCP service has reserved. Then update your lmhosts
> file, and restart or renew your IP addresses on each Windows box.
>
> Lanman
>
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***
>
> On 7/19/2003 at 7:09 AM Paul Kaplan wrote:
> >I changed the configuration of my home network and now am having problems
> >seeing the machines from each other.
> >
> >Formerly, I shared an internet connection from one machine and had a
> >switch to
> >connect the local machines.  The ethernet card on the internal network had
> >a
> >fixed IP address as did all the local machines.  The local machines used a
> >gateway IP address and a fixed DNS server address (from the ISP).  I used
> >Samba and was able to see all the local machines from the linux box
> >(LM9.1).
> >On the Windows side (W2k), the samba shares appeared in Network
> >Neighborhood.
> >
> >Now I have a router on the network which dynamically assigns IP address to
> >the
> >LAN and all the machines are set to DHCP.  Initially I made no changes to
> >my
> >Samba setup other than to update the IP addresses of the LAN machines in
> >/etc/samba/lmhosts).  I can no longer see the LAN machines from my Linux
> >box
> >(although I can ping them all by IP address or name).  From the Windows
> >side,
> >although I can find my samba shares by "search for computer" and
> >subsequently
> >force a virtual drive mapping, I can no longer see the machines under
> >network
> >neighborhood, nor can I manually create a virtual drive map under "connect
> >network drive".
> >
> >I'd like to be able to get at my winboxes from the lin box, and understand
> >the
> >win weirdness.
> >
> >Any ideas what the problem is and how to fix it?
> >
> >TIA
> >Paul
> >
> >
> >Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> >Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN problem

2003-07-19 Thread Lanman
Paul; If your router is handing off DHCP addresses, and your PC's are using their 
lmhosts file to find each other, you'll run into problems every time the router hands 
out new IP addresses. Try logging into the router and disabling the DHCP service, or 
use IP adresses that are outside of the range of IP's that your DHCP service has 
reserved. Then update your lmhosts file, and restart or renew your IP addresses on 
each Windows box.

Lanman

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 7/19/2003 at 7:09 AM Paul Kaplan wrote:

>I changed the configuration of my home network and now am having problems
>seeing the machines from each other.
>
>Formerly, I shared an internet connection from one machine and had a
>switch to
>connect the local machines.  The ethernet card on the internal network had
>a
>fixed IP address as did all the local machines.  The local machines used a
>gateway IP address and a fixed DNS server address (from the ISP).  I used
>Samba and was able to see all the local machines from the linux box
>(LM9.1).
>On the Windows side (W2k), the samba shares appeared in Network
>Neighborhood.
>
>Now I have a router on the network which dynamically assigns IP address to
>the
>LAN and all the machines are set to DHCP.  Initially I made no changes to
>my
>Samba setup other than to update the IP addresses of the LAN machines in
>/etc/samba/lmhosts).  I can no longer see the LAN machines from my Linux
>box
>(although I can ping them all by IP address or name).  From the Windows
>side,
>although I can find my samba shares by "search for computer" and
>subsequently
>force a virtual drive mapping, I can no longer see the machines under
>network
>neighborhood, nor can I manually create a virtual drive map under "connect
>network drive".
>
>I'd like to be able to get at my winboxes from the lin box, and understand
>the
>win weirdness.
>
>Any ideas what the problem is and how to fix it?
>
>TIA
>Paul
>
>
>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN interface isn't working

2003-03-29 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 23:41, VST Sysadmin wrote:
> HI
> 
> OK I'll explain things in detail.
> 
> 
> I installed MDK 9.1 on a box with KT400, palomino
> 2000+
> 3c905TX NIC, ati radeon 9000, 512 MB DDR333.
> 
> The instalation was successful, all hardware was
> installed , no error messages, no [FAILED] scripts.
> In windows XP, this box works OK.
> 
> Then I installed MDK 9.0 - ABSOLUTELY the same
> problem.
> 
> After that I boot slackware 9.0 from CD.
> I loaded the module 3c59x, put up the interface and
> everything works OK
> 
> Now I have useless MDK 9.0 on my box :(
> Please help me :)
> Tod

Look, each distro is going to load modules differently - and possibly
assign IRQ's and IO addresses differently - what you might try to do is
to change the options for loading the 3com modules in the
/etc/modules.conf file - you should be able to read the info on that
module under the /usr/src/linux/drivers/net directory - even if it means
reading the header code (.c and .h) for the options...

The 3com card are quite standard as you can well imagine, so it's got to
be something silly and simple.

You might want to either disable PNP OS in your BIOS or try changing the
options for loading the module. It HAS to work...they're flawless
cards...even moving it into a different slot might have a better effect,
but that's more work and editing a text file...

-- 
Sun Mar 30 07:40:00 EST 2003
 07:40:00 up 8 days, 19:27,  4 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.11, 0.09
--
|____  | kuhn media australia|
|   / ,, /| |'-.   | http://kma.0catch.com   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  |=|
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  | stephen kuhn|
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  |/ ._/  |"| |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|  |'.  `\ | | |icq: 5483808 |
|  ;"""/ / | | | |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389|
|  '  `-`' " " | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU   |
--
 linux user:267497 * MDK 9.1 * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting
 machine no:194239 * RH 7.3 * Sales - Service - Support - Tutor
--
** This messages was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer **

"Well, well, well!  Well if it isn't fat stinking billy goat Billy Boy in
poison!  How art thou, thou globby bottle of cheap stinking chip oil?  Come
and get one in the yarbles, if ya have any yarble, ya eunuch jelly thou!"
- Alex in "Clockwork Orange"

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN interface isn't working

2003-03-29 Thread VST Sysadmin

--- Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 29 March 2003 07:41 am, VST Sysadmin
> wrote:
> > HI
> >
> > OK I'll explain things in detail.
> >
> >
> > I installed MDK 9.1 on a box with KT400, palomino
> > 2000+
> > 3c905TX NIC, ati radeon 9000, 512 MB DDR333.
> >
> 
> 
> APIC?  Is Slackware's kernel compiled with or
> without apic support?  Mandrake 
> has apic enabled by default.
> 
> Try booting the kernel with noapic boot parameter.
> 
> -- 
> Greg
> 
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
> 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> 


That's it. Yes. It works now. God bless you Greg.
Tod


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN interface isn't working

2003-03-29 Thread Greg Meyer
On Saturday 29 March 2003 07:41 am, VST Sysadmin wrote:
> HI
>
> OK I'll explain things in detail.
>
>
> I installed MDK 9.1 on a box with KT400, palomino
> 2000+
> 3c905TX NIC, ati radeon 9000, 512 MB DDR333.
>


APIC?  Is Slackware's kernel compiled with or without apic support?  Mandrake 
has apic enabled by default.

Try booting the kernel with noapic boot parameter.

-- 
Greg

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN interface isn't working

2003-03-28 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 10:37, VST Sysadmin wrote:
> HI,
> I've just have my new box and tried to install
> mandrake 9.1.
> Instalation was OK, but I couldn't bring up the
> lan interface card.
> After the instalation the ping commands gives 100%
> loss.
> First I tried with 3C905C with 3c59x module.
> module loads OK, ifconfig passes OK, but still there
> is
> no connection.
> Then I tried with via-rhune card, but the result
> was absolutely the same.
> I checked for firewall with iptables -L, but there are
> no rules there to stop packets :(
> to eliminate hardware problem I loaded slackware 9.0
> from CD and there the lan card works OK with the same
> settings.
> I'll appreciate any help !
> Tod

Really strange mate...
In the MDK installation, did you enter in your IP/network information
prior to checking for connectivity?

-- 
Sat Mar 29 16:30:01 EST 2003
 16:30:01 up 8 days,  3:17,  4 users,  load average: 0.02, 0.06, 0.07
--
|____  | kuhn media australia|
|   / ,, /| |'-.   | http://kma.0catch.com   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  |=|
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  | stephen kuhn|
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  |/ ._/  |"| |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|  |'.  `\ | | |icq: 5483808 |
|  ;"""/ / | | | |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.---.| | mobile: 0410-728-389|
|  '  `-`' " " | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU   |
--
 linux user:267497 * MDK 9.1 * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting
 machine no:194239 * RH 7.3 * Sales - Service - Support - Tutor
--
** This messages was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer **

The closest library doesn't have the material you need. 
-- Hansen's Library Axiom

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] LAN/firewall setup

2003-01-04 Thread Dennis Myers
On Saturday 04 January 2003 10:09 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 13:57, Dennis Myers wrote:..
>
> > Son of a gun, I tried IPCop one more time and this time I started the
> > dhcp server in it and now I have stealth showing at grc.com and dhcp but
> > no ip showing in the MCC connection gui.  Looks like we are running
> > everything through the firewall now. How does dhcpcd relate to
> > ipmasquarading?  Things look better now. I may not have it perfect but at
> > least I have something working half way right.  Oh, I can type in the
> > https address and get the firewall now, before I had to go to MCC and
> > change to static ip in "connection" before I could call up the firewall
> > machine.  So looks like all my comps are connecting at high end speed
> > that the modem is capable of. Dances a little jig.  :  )
>
> Dudeman, that is way cool!
>
> Meanwhile, the DHCP assigns "internal" IP addresses from a pool of IP's
> - so the IP "internall" hits the firewall/DHCP server and get's
> "proxied" to your actual IP address externally...(translated from
> internal IP to outside IP)
Still dancing the jig, and so the dhcp thing is really like ip masquerading 
cause from the outside it looks like the static address is what is on the 
net?  Stubborn is trying for 6 months to find the ignorant mistake or lack of 
understanding that was stonewalling you. So by definition I am stubborn. Now 
the trick is to remember the trick. : {

-- 
Dennis M.  linux user # 180842


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Fwd: Re: [newbie] LAN/firewall setup

2003-01-03 Thread Dennis Myers


--  Forwarded Message  --

Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN/firewall setup
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 18:06:36 -0600
From: Dennis  Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Friday 03 January 2003 05:43 pm, you wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 09:45, Dennis Myers wrote:
> > Stephen, do you have to use a crossover cat 5 cable between the switch
> > and the firewall/router?  When I make my cable connections like you show
> > I can not connect to the internet with a client machine. If I have the
> > eth1 and eth0 from the firewall into the switch with one of them set to
> > the port linked to uplink position and the other in a normal port on the
> > switch then the other comps can connect using 192.168.0.1 as the gateway.
> >  This is really puzzling me.
>
> Ok...so then you actually have a "hardware" firewall, ya?
>
> In my configurations, I have a straight cat5 from the ISP's box (ADSL
> modem) to the linux box. The linux box uses DHCP to obtain it's IP addy
> from the ISP.
>
> Firewalling is turned on on the linux box (hand-configured, the plain
> ol' firealling via either ipchains or iptables). IP masquerading via NAT
> is turned on. The second NIC in this box is set to 192.168.0.1 - the
> rest of the machines are hence after that. The client machines use the
> 192.168.0.1 as the gateway AND the primary DNS with the secondary DNS
> set to the ISP's primary DNS.
>
> The cat5 for the second NIC goes into the 10/100 switch, and the server
> and clients all are on that switch.
>
> Now if I'm reading ya right, you got your client machines and your linux
> box all hangin offa switch (hardware?)...

Right, the firewall box is stand alone with two NICs and all the other client
boxes are connected into the switch.  However when I run one of the firewall
NICs to the switch and the other to the cable modem I can ping internet with
the firewall box but none of the clients can. So what I have right now is
both Firewall NICs running into the switch and the uplink on the switch going
to the cable modem.  I know this will end up with me saying "DUH! I
should have seen the answer". Hope this made my setup a little clearer.
--
Dennis M.  linux user # 180842

---
I keep forgetting to set to newbie
-- 
Dennis M.  linux user # 180842


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN/firewall setup

2003-01-01 Thread Lanman
Dennis; How does your cable modem connect to your switch? Doesn't it have a connection 
for a
standard network cable? Or does it use a USB connector? You should have received a 
gray/silver
cable with 2 network connectors on it (obviously there would be one at each end!). If 
not, it's probably
a USB connector cable. See if you can send me the brand and model of your cable modem. 
I'll see
what I can do to help.

What I meant by #1 is that you should be connecting your cable modem to the 
firewall/router! My Bad!
The cable modem should have a normal network port on it, or it should have a special 
cable to connect
from the cable modem to your firewall/router PC, either using a standard network port 
or a USB port on
the firewall/router box.

In other words, cable modem to firewall/router, firewall/router to switch, switch to 
PC's in your network.
That's the way your wiring should be connected.

I apologize for the confusion.


Lanman


*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 1/1/2003 at 10:18 PM Dennis Myers wrote:
>Still not right, what is meant by 1. above? Cable modem to switch- eth0, I
>don't understand that, the modem has no ethernet card, but it connects
>with
>the switch in the uplink position?  Sorry, I must be dense when trying to
>make this connection.  Or it's late and I must go to bed now. Happy New
>year
>all, 2003 will be interesting.  :  )
>--
>Dennis M.  linux user # 180842
>
>
>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Dan LaBine
President
Maximum Lans
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(514) 489-7825
6915 Fielding Ave.
Suite # 228
Montreal, Quebec,
H4V 1P4



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN/firewall setup

2003-01-01 Thread Lanman
Dennis; Start by Losing MNF. Dump it completely. It's way too complex a firewall 
solution for your network.
Do a fresh install of Smoothwall, and apply all the updates, then configure Smoothwall 
for your requirements
following the suggestions I sent in my last email.

For your requirments, you can also look at running Mandrake 8.0 and installing 
Firestarter, Shorewall, Bastille,
etc, and run your web-site directly on the firewall system using Apache. Add a larger 
chunk of Ram, and a
decent sized hard drive (10 to 40 Gigs), and you could also run Samba (Windows  File 
Sharing), and ProFTPD
(FTP Server) on it without too much hassle. Your life will be much simpler, and you'll 
have a lot more Free time
for important things like BEER or Women!

MNF is based on Mandrake 8.2, and customized to work as a firewall/router PLUS a 
"Front-End" Server for larger
networks, and is therefore overly complex for a home network. It also requires a fair 
amount of maintenance on a
regular basis. Kinda like using Thor's hammer to fix your watch!

By the sound of your reply, you have more than one Firewall package running on this 
box. You should consider
losing the others, and reverting to an older Mandrake version, or give "E-Smith" a 
try. Here's the link;

http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/e-smith/

It comes with a web-server, email server, DNS, etc included. EZ to install too. Who 
needs a DMZ when the one box
can do it all? A friend of mine has been running E-Smith for about 2 years on a 
P233MMX with 20 web-sites, 3 FTP
servers, 6 email servers with NO downtime. Comes with a web-based interface as well. 
Might be worth looking at
for your system, but MNF is way too heavy for your setup.

Just my 2 cents.

Lanman

>Short on info, sorry.  The firewall/router is homebuilt pc running MNF, I
>have
>had SNF and IPCOP running on it also.  The computer is a older SOYO mb
>with a
>K6II 266 processor running with 128mb sdram. Has two NICs in it and I was
>thinking of running another as one of the computers attached is  my web
>server and I will put that in a DMZ once I figure out what is going
>haywire
>on me. So for now I am trying to run MNF which has smoothwall as its base.
>
>Thanks for any feed back and help. I will reexam what I have and see if
>that
>will get it going.
>--
>Dennis M.  linux user # 180842
>
>
>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Dan LaBine
President
Maximum Lans
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(514) 489-7825
6915 Fielding Ave.
Suite # 228
Montreal, Quebec,
H4V 1P4



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN/firewall setup

2003-01-01 Thread Dennis Myers
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 06:47 pm, Dan LaBine wrote:
> Dennis; Your setup is almost correct. First of all, is your firewall/router
> a PC or an appliance? Either way, I suggest you modify your set up as
> follows;
>
> 1) Cablemodem to switch - eth0 (using DHCP-client) - Your ISP will probably
> want to assign an IP address for you. Use the Cat5 cable they provided for
> this connection - cable is probably 5 or 6 feet long and it came with the
> cablemodem.
>
> 2) Assuming you have the ability to re-configure your firewall/router,
> change the IP address related to "eth1" to 192.168.0.1, and make sure that
> all PC's use this IP as their Gateway IP. Connect a straight-through Cat5
> cable from eth1 to the switch's input or to a standard input on the switch
> if it doesn't have a port labelled "Uplink". Please note that some switches
> will have 2 ports connected together by a small line (graphic line, not an
> electronic line). This usually means that you can use one port or the other
> BUT NOT BOTH. One will usually be labelled "UpLink" and the other will be a
> standard port.
>
> 3) Connect all other PC's to the switch making sure that none of them use
> 192.168.0.1 as their IP address - it's already been used by your
> firewall/router, and can be seen by the other computers. Again, I
> stress,...Make sure that you set all other machines to use 192.168.0.1 as
> their Gateway IP, and make sure that NONE of them use 192.168.0.1 as their
> own IP.
>
> 4) Make sure that your firewall/router allows for I.C.S. (Internet
> Connection Sharing), or N.A.T. (Network Address Translation). While you're
> at it, make sure that you set your DNS IP adresses on each computer for the
> DNS servers of your ISP.
>
> If you're running a PC as your firewall/router, check the configuration so
> that it allows for I.C.S. or N.A.T., and restart it. Check your
> Firewall/Router for an Internet connection, and if that works, you know
> that all other machines should now be connected. If they can't connect,
> it's because the firewall/router is not allowing them to, and you'll need
> to either read your owner's manual, or send back aonther email with a
> detailed breakdown of how the Firewall/Router PC is configured.
>
> More info regarding the Firewall/Router would be an asset, here. Is it an
> appliance? If so, what brand and model. Is it a PC? If so, which firewall
> product and O/S is running on it?
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Lanman
>
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***
>
> On 1/1/2003 at 5:11 PM Dennis Myers wrote:
> >Below is the way I think my network should be wired. However, I can not
> >get
> >anything to connect  with the set up shown. What I have is both eth0 and
> >eth1
> >on the firewall going into the switch and then an uplink cable going to
> >the
> >cablemodem. If I wire the way I think it should be I can not ping the
> >router
> >or connect to the internet.  All computers can connect and function fine
> >with
> >the wrong set up. However, I don't feel comfortable that my firewall is
> >really protecting me.  This has to be some simple thing I am doing wrong
> >but
> >I have tried for months to make it work and no go. Any ideas or howtos
> >that
> >might clear the mud from my mind?  Suggestions are appreciated.
> >
> >
> > cablemodem
> >
> > xx.xx.xx.xxx  eth1
> > firewall/router
> > 192.168.0.5  eth0
> >
> > network switch
> >
> > 
> >
> > 192.168.0.3 .0.5.0.1
> >

Still not right, what is meant by 1. above? Cable modem to switch- eth0, I 
don't understand that, the modem has no ethernet card, but it connects with 
the switch in the uplink position?  Sorry, I must be dense when trying to 
make this connection.  Or it's late and I must go to bed now. Happy New year 
all, 2003 will be interesting.  :  )
-- 
Dennis M.  linux user # 180842


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN/firewall setup

2003-01-01 Thread Dennis Myers
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 06:47 pm, Dan LaBine wrote:
> Dennis; Your setup is almost correct. First of all, is your firewall/router
> a PC or an appliance? Either way, I suggest you modify your set up as
> follows;
>
> 1) Cablemodem to switch - eth0 (using DHCP-client) - Your ISP will probably
> want to assign an IP address for you. Use the Cat5 cable they provided for
> this connection - cable is probably 5 or 6 feet long and it came with the
> cablemodem.
>
> 2) Assuming you have the ability to re-configure your firewall/router,
> change the IP address related to "eth1" to 192.168.0.1, and make sure that
> all PC's use this IP as their Gateway IP. Connect a straight-through Cat5
> cable from eth1 to the switch's input or to a standard input on the switch
> if it doesn't have a port labelled "Uplink". Please note that some switches
> will have 2 ports connected together by a small line (graphic line, not an
> electronic line). This usually means that you can use one port or the other
> BUT NOT BOTH. One will usually be labelled "UpLink" and the other will be a
> standard port.
>
> 3) Connect all other PC's to the switch making sure that none of them use
> 192.168.0.1 as their IP address - it's already been used by your
> firewall/router, and can be seen by the other computers. Again, I
> stress,...Make sure that you set all other machines to use 192.168.0.1 as
> their Gateway IP, and make sure that NONE of them use 192.168.0.1 as their
> own IP.
>
> 4) Make sure that your firewall/router allows for I.C.S. (Internet
> Connection Sharing), or N.A.T. (Network Address Translation). While you're
> at it, make sure that you set your DNS IP adresses on each computer for the
> DNS servers of your ISP.
>
> If you're running a PC as your firewall/router, check the configuration so
> that it allows for I.C.S. or N.A.T., and restart it. Check your
> Firewall/Router for an Internet connection, and if that works, you know
> that all other machines should now be connected. If they can't connect,
> it's because the firewall/router is not allowing them to, and you'll need
> to either read your owner's manual, or send back aonther email with a
> detailed breakdown of how the Firewall/Router PC is configured.
>
> More info regarding the Firewall/Router would be an asset, here. Is it an
> appliance? If so, what brand and model. Is it a PC? If so, which firewall
> product and O/S is running on it?
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Lanman
>
> *** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***
>
> On 1/1/2003 at 5:11 PM Dennis Myers wrote:
> >Below is the way I think my network should be wired. However, I can not
> >get
> >anything to connect  with the set up shown. What I have is both eth0 and
> >eth1
> >on the firewall going into the switch and then an uplink cable going to
> >the
> >cablemodem. If I wire the way I think it should be I can not ping the
> >router
> >or connect to the internet.  All computers can connect and function fine
> >with
> >the wrong set up. However, I don't feel comfortable that my firewall is
> >really protecting me.  This has to be some simple thing I am doing wrong
> >but
> >I have tried for months to make it work and no go. Any ideas or howtos
> >that
> >might clear the mud from my mind?  Suggestions are appreciated.
> >
> >
> > cablemodem
> >
> > xx.xx.xx.xxx  eth1
> > firewall/router
> > 192.168.0.5  eth0
> >
> > network switch
> >
> > 
> >
> > 192.168.0.3 .0.5.0.1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Dennis M.  linux user # 180842
> >
> >
> >Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> >Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>
> Dan LaBine
> President
> Maximum Lans
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (514) 489-7825
> 6915 Fielding Ave.
> Suite # 228
> Montreal, Quebec,
> H4V 1P4
Short on info, sorry.  The firewall/router is homebuilt pc running MNF, I have 
had SNF and IPCOP running on it also.  The computer is a older SOYO mb with a 
K6II 266 processor running with 128mb sdram. Has two NICs in it and I was 
thinking of running another as one of the computers attached is  my web 
server and I will put that in a DMZ once I figure out what is going haywire 
on me. So for now I am trying to run MNF which has smoothwall as its base.  
Thanks for any feed back and help. I will reexam what I have and see if that 
will get it going. 
-- 
Dennis M.  linux user # 180842


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN/firewall setup

2003-01-01 Thread Dan LaBine
Dennis; Your setup is almost correct. First of all, is your firewall/router a PC or an 
appliance? Either way, I suggest you modify your set up as follows;

1) Cablemodem to switch - eth0 (using DHCP-client) - Your ISP will probably want to 
assign an IP address for you. Use the Cat5 cable they provided for this connection - 
cable is probably 5 or 6 feet long and it came with the cablemodem.

2) Assuming you have the ability to re-configure your firewall/router, change the IP 
address related to "eth1" to 192.168.0.1, and make sure that all PC's use this IP as 
their Gateway IP. Connect a straight-through Cat5 cable from eth1 to the switch's 
input or to a standard input on the switch if it doesn't have a port labelled 
"Uplink". Please note that some switches will have 2 ports connected together by a 
small line (graphic line, not an electronic line). This usually means that you can use 
one port or the other BUT NOT BOTH. One will usually be labelled "UpLink" and the 
other will be a standard port.

3) Connect all other PC's to the switch making sure that none of them use 192.168.0.1 
as their IP address - it's already been used by your firewall/router, and can be seen 
by the other computers. Again, I stress,...Make sure that you set all other machines 
to use 192.168.0.1 as their Gateway IP, and make sure that NONE of them use 
192.168.0.1 as their own IP.

4) Make sure that your firewall/router allows for I.C.S. (Internet Connection 
Sharing), or N.A.T. (Network Address Translation). While you're at it, make sure that 
you set your DNS IP adresses on each computer for the DNS servers of your ISP.

If you're running a PC as your firewall/router, check the configuration so that it 
allows for I.C.S. or N.A.T., and restart it. Check your Firewall/Router for an 
Internet connection, and if that works, you know that all other machines should now be 
connected. If they can't connect, it's because the firewall/router is not allowing 
them to, and you'll need to either read your owner's manual, or send back aonther 
email with a detailed breakdown of how the Firewall/Router PC is configured.

More info regarding the Firewall/Router would be an asset, here. Is it an appliance? 
If so, what brand and model. Is it a PC? If so, which firewall product and O/S is 
running on it?

Hope this helps!

Lanman

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 1/1/2003 at 5:11 PM Dennis Myers wrote:

>Below is the way I think my network should be wired. However, I can not
>get
>anything to connect  with the set up shown. What I have is both eth0 and
>eth1
>on the firewall going into the switch and then an uplink cable going to
>the
>cablemodem. If I wire the way I think it should be I can not ping the
>router
>or connect to the internet.  All computers can connect and function fine
>with
>the wrong set up. However, I don't feel comfortable that my firewall is
>really protecting me.  This has to be some simple thing I am doing wrong
>but
>I have tried for months to make it work and no go. Any ideas or howtos
>that
>might clear the mud from my mind?  Suggestions are appreciated.
>
>
>   cablemodem
>   |
>   xx.xx.xx.xxx  eth1
>   firewall/router
>   192.168.0.5  eth0
>   |
>   network switch
>   |
>   
>   |   |   |
>   192.168.0.3 .0.5.0.1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>Dennis M.  linux user # 180842
>
>
>Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
>Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Dan LaBine
President
Maximum Lans
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(514) 489-7825
6915 Fielding Ave.
Suite # 228
Montreal, Quebec,
H4V 1P4



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN/firewall setup

2003-01-01 Thread bascule
hi dennis,
your description doesn't match your diagram, your diagram has the cable modem 
attached to eth1 of your firewall and the switch to eth0 of your firewall, 
which is exactly what i have, plugging the cable modem straight into your 
switch won't work unless it's actually not a switch but a router that can 
take dhcp assignments, (i'm assumimg that you use dhcp, if you have a  static 
this still applies since whatever the cable modem plugs into must be set up 
correctly), all my cables into my switch are patch cables and not crossover, 
i have to admit that i've never looked at the cable that came with the modem 
so whether that's crossover or not i don't know but using the one that came 
with the modem means it doesn't matter! - though if someone could enlighten 
me without my having to take the network down (and get down on hands and 
knees behind my desk!)
so perhaps you could clarify your setup, also when you say that your computers 
work fine i assume you mean with each other but not with the internet? 
otherwise there's something i'm missing here!

bascule

On Wednesday 01 Jan 2003 11:11 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
> Below is the way I think my network should be wired. However, I can not get
> anything to connect  with the set up shown. What I have is both eth0 and
> eth1 on the firewall going into the switch and then an uplink cable going
> to the cablemodem. If I wire the way I think it should be I can not ping
> the router or connect to the internet.  All computers can connect and
> function fine with the wrong set up. However, I don't feel comfortable that
> my firewall is really protecting me.  This has to be some simple thing I am
> doing wrong but I have tried for months to make it work and no go. Any
> ideas or howtos that might clear the mud from my mind?  Suggestions are
> appreciated.
>
>
>   cablemodem
>
>   xx.xx.xx.xxx  eth1
>   firewall/router
>   192.168.0.5  eth0
>
>   network switch
>
>   
>
>   192.168.0.3 .0.5.0.1

-- 
'Oh, them as makes the endings don't get them,' said Granny.
(Maskerade)



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] lan browsing /samba

2002-05-24 Thread magnet


- Original Message -
From: "LtCdData" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] lan browsing /samba


> On Thursday 23 May 2002 10:13 pm, you wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 May 2002 01:22 pm, LtCdData opened a general hailing
> >
> > frequency and transmitted to all open stations:
> > > Ive set up Samba on here (MD8.2) on KDE to (2k) pc. Access from
windo$e
> > > to Linux is fine, however getting lan browsing the other way is being
a
> > > pain to get working, are there any "good" HowTo for the LISa ResLISa
> > > config. as all i seem to get is "could not connect to host localhost"
> >
> > personally i find lisa to be a pain.  you might try komba2.  it should
be
> > on your cd's if not installed already.
>
> ""cheerz""  komba2 works well..took 2 mins to get access set up :-
>
>
>  --> magnet  use above <-- Lt
>
>

Cheers data, will look into this at weekend :) [connection sporadic atm this
end :(]

regards
magnet






> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] lan browsing /samba

2002-05-23 Thread LtCdData

On Thursday 23 May 2002 10:13 pm, you wrote:
> On Thursday 23 May 2002 01:22 pm, LtCdData opened a general hailing
>
> frequency and transmitted to all open stations:
> > Ive set up Samba on here (MD8.2) on KDE to (2k) pc. Access from windo$e
> > to Linux is fine, however getting lan browsing the other way is being a
> > pain to get working, are there any "good" HowTo for the LISa ResLISa
> > config. as all i seem to get is "could not connect to host localhost"
>
> personally i find lisa to be a pain.  you might try komba2.  it should be
> on your cd's if not installed already.
 
""cheerz""  komba2 works well..took 2 mins to get access set up :-


 --> magnet  use above <-- Lt



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] lan browsing /samba

2002-05-23 Thread shane

On Thursday 23 May 2002 01:22 pm, LtCdData opened a general hailing 
frequency and transmitted to all open stations:

> Ive set up Samba on here (MD8.2) on KDE to (2k) pc. Access from windo$e
> to Linux is fine, however getting lan browsing the other way is being a
> pain to get working, are there any "good" HowTo for the LISa ResLISa
> config. as all i seem to get is "could not connect to host localhost"

personally i find lisa to be a pain.  you might try komba2.  it should be on 
your cd's if not installed already.

-- 
At first they burn books, eventually they burn people.

shane
Profile at: http://dmoz.org/profiles/shen.html
Proud to be a DMOZ editor since 10-98
Mandrake Users Club Member http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/club/
Registered linux user #101606 @ http://counter.li.org/




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-17 Thread Gerald Waugh

On Friday 17 May 2002 07:45 am, Eric McClure wrote:
> Yes, an old 266mhz machine with Mandrake 8.1 on it.  Currently I'm playing
> with different firewall software on it.  Haven't really deceided which one
> I like though...
>
Keep us posted, what you tried, what you liked, waht you didn't like.
Good Luck

-- 
Gerald Waugh 
http://www.frontstreetnetworks.com :: Phone. [011] 203.785.0699
Front Street Networks LLC | SOHO Networks & Web Site Hosting
229 Front Street, Ste. #C, New Haven, CT, 06513-3203 United States



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-17 Thread Eric McClure

Yes, an old 266mhz machine with Mandrake 8.1 on it.  Currently I'm playing
with different firewall software on it.  Haven't really deceided which one
I like though...



On Fri, 17 May 2002, Gerald Waugh wrote:

> On Friday 17 May 2002 12:19 am, Eric McClure wrote:
> > It is a very easy setup.  I live in Phoenix and currently have four
> > machines on three different platforms running on it using a router I
> > picked up and a hub for about $150.00 if I remember right.
> >
> > Cox told me to run a firewall and I said that was no problem since I run
> > linux.
> >
> Well,
> You still need a firewall, you do have one don't you? Even if it is software 
> running on your Linux machine, although a seperate machine is better.
> 
> -- 
> Gerald Waugh 
> http://www.frontstreetnetworks.com :: Phone. [011] 203.785.0699
> Front Street Networks LLC | SOHO Networks & Web Site Hosting
> 229 Front Street, Ste. #C, New Haven, CT, 06513-3203 United States
> 
> 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-17 Thread Gerald Waugh

On Friday 17 May 2002 12:19 am, Eric McClure wrote:
> It is a very easy setup.  I live in Phoenix and currently have four
> machines on three different platforms running on it using a router I
> picked up and a hub for about $150.00 if I remember right.
>
> Cox told me to run a firewall and I said that was no problem since I run
> linux.
>
Well,
You still need a firewall, you do have one don't you? Even if it is software 
running on your Linux machine, although a seperate machine is better.

-- 
Gerald Waugh 
http://www.frontstreetnetworks.com :: Phone. [011] 203.785.0699
Front Street Networks LLC | SOHO Networks & Web Site Hosting
229 Front Street, Ste. #C, New Haven, CT, 06513-3203 United States



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-16 Thread Eric McClure

It is a very easy setup.  I live in Phoenix and currently have four
machines on three different platforms running on it using a router I
picked up and a hub for about $150.00 if I remember right.

Cox told me to run a firewall and I said that was no problem since I run
linux.

take care,
eric l. mcclure

On Thu, 16 May 2002, Myers, Dennis R NWO wrote:

> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Brown
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem
> 
> 
> Cox supplied a software package fot connecting a Surfer Or Toshiba Cable
> Modem here in Tucson.  Simple installation!
> - Original Message - 
> From: Myers, Dennis R NWO 
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:15 AM
> Subject: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Does anyone use Cox cable and have a LAN set up? How hard is it to set up
> and where did you start the learning process? I'm going to switch over to
> Cox and hoping it is not rocket science. Any help is appriciated. TIA
> Dennis M. 
> 
> Thanks, I'll wait and see what they show up with. Sorry about the html again
> folks, my workstation here uses outlook and it seems to change back to html
> periodically. I never know when or why. 
>  Dennis M.
> 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-16 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Brown
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem



Cox supplied a software package fot connecting a Surfer Or Toshiba Cable Modem here in Tucson.  Simple installation!
- Original Message - 
From: Myers, Dennis R NWO 
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem





Does anyone use Cox cable and have a LAN set up? How hard is it to set up and where did you start the learning process? I'm going to switch over to Cox and hoping it is not rocket science. Any help is appriciated. TIA

Dennis M. 


Thanks, I'll wait and see what they show up with. Sorry about the html again folks, my workstation here uses outlook and it seems to change back to html periodically. I never know when or why. 

 Dennis M.





Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-16 Thread Ken Brown
Title: LAN and COX cable modem



Cox supplied a software package fot connecting a 
Surfer Or Toshiba Cable Modem here in Tucson.  Simple 
installation!

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Myers, Dennis R NWO 
  
  To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:15 
AM
  Subject: [newbie] LAN and COX cable 
  modem
  
  Does anyone use Cox cable and have a LAN set up? How hard is 
  it to set up and where did you start the learning process? I'm going to switch 
  over to Cox and hoping it is not rocket science. Any help is appriciated. 
  TIA
  Dennis M. 


Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-14 Thread Dennis Myers

On Tuesday 14 May 2002 05:08 pm, you wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2002 11:15:22 -0700
>
> "Myers, Dennis R NWO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone use Cox cable and have a LAN set up? How hard is it to set up
> > and where did you start the learning process? I'm going to switch over to
> > Cox and hoping it is not rocket science. Any help is appriciated. TIA
>
> Do you mean coax cable?
>
> Bill

Cox Cable is a service provider, they have cable tv and cable internet 
access.  They used to use or be connected with "@home" but since that went 
bankrupt they have started their own service. 
-- 
Dennis M. linux user #180842



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-14 Thread Bill Davidson

On Tue, 14 May 2002 18:33:02 -0400
"Eric Budinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> COX cable is a cable modem service provider.

Oh! Sorry. *sheepish grin*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



RE: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-14 Thread Eric Budinger

COX cable is a cable modem service provider.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Davidson
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

On Tue, 14 May 2002 11:15:22 -0700
"Myers, Dennis R NWO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Does anyone use Cox cable and have a LAN set up? How hard is it to set
up
> and where did you start the learning process? I'm going to switch over
to
> Cox and hoping it is not rocket science. Any help is appriciated. TIA

Do you mean coax cable?

Bill






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-14 Thread mike

Bill Davidson wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 14 May 2002 11:15:22 -0700
> "Myers, Dennis R NWO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Does anyone use Cox cable and have a LAN set up? How hard is it to set up
> > and where did you start the learning process? I'm going to switch over to
> > Cox and hoping it is not rocket science. Any help is appriciated. TIA


I have cox-internet ( which is high speed cable ) very easy in LM 8.0,
8.1, 8.2!

do you have one or two network interface cards? 

Only one is needed if you only have one pc at home , if you connect to
any other
pc, you will need two 1.) for the cable modem 2nd) for network.

in setting up the network card follow this: 

open up control center, next open network/internet, choose connection 
for a one only setup use the configure button and let the auto detectand
configure do it's thing. only choose to use dhcp to connect, when it's
through, apply and exit 
control center. reboot is a good idea then it all should work. 

if you want to share the connection with another pc in the house or
office,
write back , it will take a bit more time to explain.

Mike McNeese



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-14 Thread John Willby

Hi

I have a LAN set up. I use a netgear hub and reguler cables with RJ45 
connectors. I think the hardest thing I found was getting up to speed on 
firewalling and once I understood the basics of proxy and TCP/IP I was away.

I have a Sun Solaris box and that was a right pain as for some reason it put 
the wrong details in /etc/hosts and I had to change the permissions and get 
some vi action going on it and about 5 other files!

HTH

John

BTW what is the advantage of Coax then?



On Tuesday 14 May 2002 11:08 pm, you wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2002 11:15:22 -0700
>
> "Myers, Dennis R NWO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone use Cox cable and have a LAN set up? How hard is it to set up
> > and where did you start the learning process? I'm going to switch over to
> > Cox and hoping it is not rocket science. Any help is appriciated. TIA
>
> Do you mean coax cable?
>
> Bill



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN and COX cable modem

2002-05-14 Thread Bill Davidson

On Tue, 14 May 2002 11:15:22 -0700
"Myers, Dennis R NWO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Does anyone use Cox cable and have a LAN set up? How hard is it to set up
> and where did you start the learning process? I'm going to switch over to
> Cox and hoping it is not rocket science. Any help is appriciated. TIA

Do you mean coax cable?

Bill



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN with 2 IP's from DSL povider ?

2002-05-02 Thread Hanan Shargi

Thank you Brian,

but the point is I already had this connection sharing, and I was able to set 
it up with the help of some list members ( infact you were the one who helped 
me out alot back then :) )

but the problem is that while having this sharing, and Linux was used as a 
firewall, and Bastille was running...etc. I had performance problems, my 
connection used to go down a lot, and when I contacted the ISP their 
technician came in and said that the reason why I was getting disconnected is 
becoz the  NIC was trying to connect with a 100 speed while the line can only 
handle 10, thats why i was getting disconnected too often. He said he didnt 
know how to force the card to connect with 10 under linux, so he offered me a 
new IP  ( without paying for it though :)

I posted another question on the list asking if I can force the card to 
connect with 10 speed,

Isnt there a way to concet both PCs while them having the 2 IP's ? I really 
liked the idea coz back then my w2k machine had to get off the net whenever I 
needed to take my notebook ( the linux machine ) with me to school ( which 
used to piss off my 4 years old son as he couldnt surf pbskids.org  while I 
wasnt at home :) )

I just need them to be on the same LAN so that i can share the printer and 
browse both hard drives using samba.

():-)

-
Hanan AL-Shargi




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN with 2 IP's from DSL povider ?

2002-05-02 Thread Brian Parish

Hanan,

No - they are not on a LAN, they are sharing a path to the internet. But
this can be changed very easily.  Just set up the linux machine to share
its internet connection and the W2K box uses this as a gateway.  The
connection to the DSL would then come from a 2nd NIC installed in the
linux machine.

This way your linux machine can firewall your W2K box and both machines
can share resources, including the internet.

Obviously this requires you to install an additional NIC, but they are
cheap!  If you need more specific help on how to go about it, just post
again - lots of people here have done this many times.

HTH
Brian

On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 11:01, Hanan Shargi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> picture this setting :
> 
> linux box with 10.x.x.x IP   ( IP prvided by the DSL provider )
> 
> HUB
> 
> W2K box with 10.x.x.y IP ( another IP prvided by the DSL provider )
> 
> the two boxes connects to a HUB and the UP-link on the HUB connects to the DSL 
> coming from the phone line on the wall ( the DSL )
> 
> technically speaking, are these two machines considered to be on one LAN ?!
> If so ...
> How can these 2 mahines be set to see each others drives and share a printer ?
> 
> -
> Hanan AL-Shargi
> 
> 
> 
> 

> Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN

2002-01-30 Thread bascule

then it looks like your card is setup correctly, i'm assuming that you don't 
have any ppp or tap entries (these would be for dial-up) ifconfig will also 
say what ip address the card has, have you assigned a static ip address or 
are you obtaining one via dhcp, if you are trying to connect at work i would 
suggest using dhcp as it is likely that this is how things are setup there, 
run  -as root - linuxconf, assuming it is installed, or mandrake control 
center and you will be able to configure this, if there is no dhcp server on 
the local network you will need to know what ip address to give your machine, 
you should ask your network admin for this and details of nameservers, of 
course this is all assuming a tcp/ip local network, if you are on an ipx only 
(novell protocol) then i can't help:-)

bascule

On Thursday 31 January 2002 4:05 am, you wrote:
> Yes I think the card is loaded properly.
>
> It shows up in various places and the ifconfig throws up a bunch of stuff
> after
>
> eth0 ...
>
>
> 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN

2002-01-30 Thread Nick Young

Yes I think the card is loaded properly.

It shows up in various places and the ifconfig throws up a bunch of stuff
after

eth0 ...


- Original Message -
From: "bascule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN


do you know if your card is installed properly? with the correct module?
what does -as root - 'ifconfig' show you?

bascule

On Thursday 31 January 2002 3:18 am, you wrote:
> OK right.
>
> I have connected to the internet OK before using a modem but now I'm
trying
> to connect though a LAN in the office.
>
> I don't know where to begin!
>
>   I've got a cord coming out of the wall that fits into my Ethernet card
> and the green light is on but the orange one is not.
>








Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN

2002-01-30 Thread bascule

do you know if your card is installed properly? with the correct module?
what does -as root - 'ifconfig' show you?

bascule

On Thursday 31 January 2002 3:18 am, you wrote:
> OK right.
>
> I have connected to the internet OK before using a modem but now I'm trying
> to connect though a LAN in the office.
>
> I don't know where to begin!
>
>   I've got a cord coming out of the wall that fits into my Ethernet card
> and the green light is on but the orange one is not.
>



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN

2002-01-30 Thread Nick Young


OK right.

I have connected to the internet OK before using a modem but now I'm trying
to connect though a LAN in the office.

I don't know where to begin!

  I've got a cord coming out of the wall that fits into my Ethernet card and
the green light is on but the orange one is not.



- Original Message -
From: "bascule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN


you specify to your browser and email client the relevant ip addresses, the
question is whether you are connected to the network those adresses are
reached by, is this question about how to use web browsing or about how to
set up networking? if the latter then we need more info than you have given,
assuming you are referring to a pcmcia ethernet card, what is it connected
to, your local network at work? cable modem at home?

bascule

On Thursday 31 January 2002 2:01 am, you wrote:
> I've got Linux Mandrake running OK on my laptop - I've got a PCMI Ethernet
> connection and I want to plug into an Intranet and connect to the internet
> etc.
>
> Where do i specify to my web browser or email client that I want it to use
> that connection ?








Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com






Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN settings

2001-12-05 Thread Pascal Goguey

On Wednesday 05 December 2001 19:33, you wrote:
> Can anyone tell me where and how put my net numbers (ip,netmask etc) ? I'm
> new to Linux so...

Congratulations! Good choice!

> you could send your example(file) too.

Example file? You mean you  want to do the setup without the
GUI? In this case, I don't know. Otherwise, there is a GUI
which allows you to setup your net parameters, and also
configure the net sharing in case you have other machines
connected to your Mandrake station. It's really painless and
should take about 5 minutes, tests included.

Net setup:
1. Open Mandrake control center ;
2. Choose "Network and internet" (click the little "+");
3. Clic the "connection" icon;
4. Click setup (right bottom)
and then the settings should be obvious


> Tego nie znajdziesz w żadnym sklepie!
> [ http://oferty.onet.pl ]

Have fun.

Pascal



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN settings

2001-12-05 Thread Derek Jennings

Just open up K Menu > Configuration > Networking > Netconf  you will find all 
the networking parameters there


On Wednesday 05 December 2001 10:33, you wrote:
> Can anyone tell me where and how put my net numbers (ip,netmask etc) ? I'm
> new to Linux so...you could send your example(file) too.
>
>
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Tego nie znajdziesz w żadnym sklepie!
> [ http://oferty.onet.pl ]



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN and eth0 loading

2001-11-28 Thread Dennis Myers

On Wednesday 28 November 2001 20:51, you wrote:
> The problem is that my eth card doesnt want to load while starting linux
> M8.0. How to fix it ? DAMN!
>
>
>
>
> som errors i dont understand.
> - Original Message -
>
I forgot to mention that you can look in your /etc/modules.conf  file to see 
if you see a line that says 
"alias eth0  8139too "  or something similar for your ethernet card. (w/o the 
quotes of course) .   Hope I'm not going over trampled ground. HTH
-- 
Dennis M.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN and eth0 loading

2001-11-28 Thread Dennis Myers

On Wednesday 28 November 2001 20:51, you wrote:
> The problem is that my eth card doesnt want to load while starting linux
> M8.0. How to fix it ? DAMN!
>
>
>
>
> som errors i dont understand.
> > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Have you tried the command 
ifup eth0  or  eth1   wichever your card is?
if that gets an error message then try 
insmod 1839rtl  or  again what ever module your card would be.  You should be 
able to see it from the Mandrake Control Center> Hardware   and then ethernet 
or network card.  HTH
-- 
Dennis M.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] LAN Cable connection set up

2001-06-06 Thread Tim Holmes

Well, having had my own problems with my cable connection, and then
being even more frustrated when all it took was a modem reboot to fix
the problem.

It appears that the modem connects first, downloads any software
updates for the modem each time.  And if there isn't something there
asking for an address, or requesting traffic, it forgets it's actually
there.  So it downloads the acceptable MAC addresses and then fetches
an IP address.  So if you run into this problem again, just give that a
try.  All our machines for UNIXTECHS are on cable connections and when
we run into problems, that usually does the trick.

But glad I could help!
tdh


T. Holmes
-
UNIXTECHS.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
"Real Men Us Vi!"

 
| Tim it works after your advice.  Just turned the modem off, restarted the 
| network, and it's up and running.  I can't begin to tell you how thankfull I 
| am for your help.  I posted to a few newsgroups, week of agravation and then 
| you came and helped.  Thanks again.
| 
| If you are ever in Michigan, USA email me.  I owe you lunch.
| 
| Ilya Sterin
  -- 




Re: [newbie] LAN Cable connection set up

2001-06-06 Thread Ilya Sterin

Tim it works after your advice.  Just turned the modem off, restarted the 
network, and it's up and running.  I can't begin to tell you how thankfull I 
am for your help.  I posted to a few newsgroups, week of agravation and then 
you came and helped.  Thanks again.

If you are ever in Michigan, USA email me.  I owe you lunch.

Ilya Sterin


>From: Tim Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Tim Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Ilya Sterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN Cable connection set up
>Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 09:37:55 -0400
>
>I'm assuming you're trying to connect this Linux box to the RoadRunner 
>server by itself,
>and not through a gateway router.
>
>Let's start in DrakConf.  Since you're using Mandrake 8, there's an option 
>on the left,
>that reads "Network & Internet."  Select that option, then select the 
>Connection option.
>From what you've said below, it sounds like you've gone through this 
>method.
>
>Go through and configure the card.  You can select the Cable Connection, or 
>LAN connection,
>either will work since they are basically the same set up.  Tell it to use 
>DHCP, if it
>doesn't have the software, it will prompt for the CD and will install it.  
>It will tell you
>that it's going to restart the network.  I can't remember if it gives you a 
>choice to say
>no, but if it does, tell it now.  It's just going to time out.
>
>After you've done that, power off your cable modem.  Leave it off for a 
>good 10 seconds or
>so, then power it back on.
>
>Now head back to your Linux box.  su - to root, and run this command.
>
>[root@r2d2 /root]# /etc/init.d/network status
>Configured devices:
>lo eth0
>Devices that are down:
>
>Devices with modified configuration:
>
>You should get some variant of that output when you run that command.  
>However if you see
>eth0 listed under "Devices that are down:" then you're network card is not 
>completely
>configured.  If your output does look like that, then run this command.
>
>[root@yoda /root]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart
>Setting network parameters:[  OK  ]
>Bringing up interface lo:  [  OK  ]
>Bringing up interface eth0:[  OK  ]
>
>And that should look something like it does above.  It may take a little 
>bit of time at
>bringing up interface eth0, that's expected since it's trying to get an IP 
>address from the
>DHCP server.  If it comes back and gives you an [  OK  ] then you should be 
>set.  But to
>make sure run the command ifconfig.  Your out put will look something like 
>this.
>
>[root@r2d2 /root]# ifconfig
>eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX
>   inet addr:XX.XXX.XXX.XXX  Bcast:XX.XXX.XXX.XXX  
>Mask:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
>   UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>   RX packets:720497 errors:2 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:2
>   TX packets:123941 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1
>   collisions:20 txqueuelen:100
>   RX bytes:439288285 (418.9 Mb)  TX bytes:10165271 (9.6 Mb)
>   Interrupt:3 Base address:0x9400
>
>loLink encap:Local Loopback
>   inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>   UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>   RX packets:165792 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>   TX packets:165792 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>   collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>   RX bytes:17628231 (16.8 Mb)  TX bytes:17628231 (16.8 Mb)
>
>The numbers that are X'd out are the ones that you should look at.  The 
>inet addr will be
>your IP address.  From there you will be able to get to the outside world 
>with no problem.
>Try testing it by pinging yahoo.com, or something else that's local.  Then 
>check if your
>machine also downloaded the DNS information.  It's stored in 
>/etc/resolv.conf, and will
>like this most likely.
>
>[root@r2d2 /root]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
>nameserver 24.131.1.9
>nameserver 24.131.1.8
>search mw.mediaone.net
>
>That should then get your machine on the network.  Now if your machine is 
>going through
>another machine that's doing internet connection sharing, then you'll have 
>to go other
>routes on getting your Mandrake 8 box on the Internet.
>tdh
>
>
>T. Holmes
>-
>UNIXTECHS.org
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-
>"Real Men Us Vi!"
>
>| I am trying to install NetGear ethernet card to use with my cable modem
>| (RoadRunner se

Re: [newbie] LAN Cable connection set up

2001-06-06 Thread Ilya Sterin

That's what I was looking for.  Thanks.  I'll try later today and let you 
know if it works.  I've tried some of that, but haven't turned the modem off 
and did some other suggested configs.  Thanks again.

Ilya Sterin


>From: Tim Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Tim Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Ilya Sterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN Cable connection set up
>Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 09:37:55 -0400
>
>I'm assuming you're trying to connect this Linux box to the RoadRunner 
>server by itself,
>and not through a gateway router.
>
>Let's start in DrakConf.  Since you're using Mandrake 8, there's an option 
>on the left,
>that reads "Network & Internet."  Select that option, then select the 
>Connection option.
>From what you've said below, it sounds like you've gone through this 
>method.
>
>Go through and configure the card.  You can select the Cable Connection, or 
>LAN connection,
>either will work since they are basically the same set up.  Tell it to use 
>DHCP, if it
>doesn't have the software, it will prompt for the CD and will install it.  
>It will tell you
>that it's going to restart the network.  I can't remember if it gives you a 
>choice to say
>no, but if it does, tell it now.  It's just going to time out.
>
>After you've done that, power off your cable modem.  Leave it off for a 
>good 10 seconds or
>so, then power it back on.
>
>Now head back to your Linux box.  su - to root, and run this command.
>
>[root@r2d2 /root]# /etc/init.d/network status
>Configured devices:
>lo eth0
>Devices that are down:
>
>Devices with modified configuration:
>
>You should get some variant of that output when you run that command.  
>However if you see
>eth0 listed under "Devices that are down:" then you're network card is not 
>completely
>configured.  If your output does look like that, then run this command.
>
>[root@yoda /root]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart
>Setting network parameters:[  OK  ]
>Bringing up interface lo:  [  OK  ]
>Bringing up interface eth0:[  OK  ]
>
>And that should look something like it does above.  It may take a little 
>bit of time at
>bringing up interface eth0, that's expected since it's trying to get an IP 
>address from the
>DHCP server.  If it comes back and gives you an [  OK  ] then you should be 
>set.  But to
>make sure run the command ifconfig.  Your out put will look something like 
>this.
>
>[root@r2d2 /root]# ifconfig
>eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX
>   inet addr:XX.XXX.XXX.XXX  Bcast:XX.XXX.XXX.XXX  
>Mask:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
>   UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>   RX packets:720497 errors:2 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:2
>   TX packets:123941 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1
>   collisions:20 txqueuelen:100
>   RX bytes:439288285 (418.9 Mb)  TX bytes:10165271 (9.6 Mb)
>   Interrupt:3 Base address:0x9400
>
>loLink encap:Local Loopback
>   inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>   UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
>   RX packets:165792 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>   TX packets:165792 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>   collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>   RX bytes:17628231 (16.8 Mb)  TX bytes:17628231 (16.8 Mb)
>
>The numbers that are X'd out are the ones that you should look at.  The 
>inet addr will be
>your IP address.  From there you will be able to get to the outside world 
>with no problem.
>Try testing it by pinging yahoo.com, or something else that's local.  Then 
>check if your
>machine also downloaded the DNS information.  It's stored in 
>/etc/resolv.conf, and will
>like this most likely.
>
>[root@r2d2 /root]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
>nameserver 24.131.1.9
>nameserver 24.131.1.8
>search mw.mediaone.net
>
>That should then get your machine on the network.  Now if your machine is 
>going through
>another machine that's doing internet connection sharing, then you'll have 
>to go other
>routes on getting your Mandrake 8 box on the Internet.
>tdh
>
>
>T. Holmes
>-
>UNIXTECHS.org
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-
>"Real Men Us Vi!"
>
>| I am trying to install NetGear ethernet card to use with my cable modem
>| (RoadRunner service, dynamically assigns IP addresses) which is 
>recognized
>| and uses the tulip driver on Mandrake 

Re: [newbie] LAN Cable connection set up

2001-06-06 Thread Tim Holmes

I'm assuming you're trying to connect this Linux box to the RoadRunner server by 
itself,
and not through a gateway router.

Let's start in DrakConf.  Since you're using Mandrake 8, there's an option on the left,
that reads "Network & Internet."  Select that option, then select the Connection 
option.
>From what you've said below, it sounds like you've gone through this method.

Go through and configure the card.  You can select the Cable Connection, or LAN 
connection,
either will work since they are basically the same set up.  Tell it to use DHCP, if it
doesn't have the software, it will prompt for the CD and will install it.  It will 
tell you
that it's going to restart the network.  I can't remember if it gives you a choice to 
say
no, but if it does, tell it now.  It's just going to time out.

After you've done that, power off your cable modem.  Leave it off for a good 10 
seconds or
so, then power it back on.

Now head back to your Linux box.  su - to root, and run this command.

[root@r2d2 /root]# /etc/init.d/network status
Configured devices:
lo eth0
Devices that are down:

Devices with modified configuration:

You should get some variant of that output when you run that command.  However if you 
see
eth0 listed under "Devices that are down:" then you're network card is not completely
configured.  If your output does look like that, then run this command.

[root@yoda /root]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart
Setting network parameters:[  OK  ]
Bringing up interface lo:  [  OK  ]
Bringing up interface eth0:[  OK  ]

And that should look something like it does above.  It may take a little bit of time at
bringing up interface eth0, that's expected since it's trying to get an IP address 
from the
DHCP server.  If it comes back and gives you an [  OK  ] then you should be set.  But 
to
make sure run the command ifconfig.  Your out put will look something like this.

[root@r2d2 /root]# ifconfig
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX
  inet addr:XX.XXX.XXX.XXX  Bcast:XX.XXX.XXX.XXX  Mask:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
  UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:720497 errors:2 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:2
  TX packets:123941 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1
  collisions:20 txqueuelen:100
  RX bytes:439288285 (418.9 Mb)  TX bytes:10165271 (9.6 Mb)
  Interrupt:3 Base address:0x9400

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:165792 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:165792 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:17628231 (16.8 Mb)  TX bytes:17628231 (16.8 Mb)

The numbers that are X'd out are the ones that you should look at.  The inet addr will 
be
your IP address.  From there you will be able to get to the outside world with no 
problem.
Try testing it by pinging yahoo.com, or something else that's local.  Then check if 
your
machine also downloaded the DNS information.  It's stored in /etc/resolv.conf, and will
like this most likely.

[root@r2d2 /root]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 24.131.1.9
nameserver 24.131.1.8
search mw.mediaone.net

That should then get your machine on the network.  Now if your machine is going through
another machine that's doing internet connection sharing, then you'll have to go other
routes on getting your Mandrake 8 box on the Internet.
tdh


T. Holmes
-
UNIXTECHS.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
"Real Men Us Vi!"
 
| I am trying to install NetGear ethernet card to use with my cable modem 
| (RoadRunner service, dynamically assigns IP addresses) which is recognized 
| and uses the tulip driver on Mandrake 8.0.  It seems like the detection 
| using the Mandrake Internet Configuration, goes fine.  It detects an 
| ethernet card and sets up LAN with no error messages.  Under host I tried 
| rr.twmi.com and the default localhost.localdomain, neither work, but I don't 
| really know what host they are looking for.  Neither worked though, my Win2K 
| system works fine and with ipconfig tells me that the default host is 
| rr.twmi.com (that's where I got it from).  After the internet set up, the 
| applet has the connect to internet button which when I click tries (for 
| about 20-30 seconds) to connect but with no luck.  I did select auto dhcp, 
| when setting up.  A few times the applet actually showed that something was 
| send, but no bytes received???  I am also not sure that anything was ever 
| send, since there is no way for me to verify and the applet might have a 
| different deffinition of send and consider no error as send???  Am I missing 
| some steps here?  I did go through the archive and found that I need to run 
| the
| 'dhcpcd -d -n -h COxxx-A eth0'
| command.  What is 

Re: [newbie] LAN Cable connection set up

2001-06-04 Thread Ilya Sterin

Why do I need a router or a computer server.  I am not trying to run a 
network, but rather get on the internet.  Yes I do use a ethernet switch to 
connect two pc's, but that has nothing to do with it, since only one is on 
at the same time.  The switch or not the switch (even when the cable modem 
is connected directly to the NIC) it doesn't work.  Routers are used to 
distribute bandwidth between computers on the network.  What are the two 
NICs for?

Ilya Sterin


>From: Tuan tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Ilya Sterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN Cable connection set up
>Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
>
>You need a Router or a computer server. If you want to
>put a linux computer act like a server, you may need
>to put 2 NIC (eth0 & eth1). 1 (eth0) should connect to
>cable modem and the other connect to the hub. Set
>others computer to dynamic IP.
>--- Ilya Sterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am trying to install NetGear ethernet card to use
> > with my cable modem
> > (RoadRunner service, dynamically assigns IP
> > addresses) which is recognized
> > and uses the tulip driver on Mandrake 8.0.  It seems
> > like the detection
> > using the Mandrake Internet Configuration, goes
> > fine.  It detects an
> > ethernet card and sets up LAN with no error
> > messages.  Under host I tried
> > rr.twmi.com and the default localhost.localdomain,
> > neither work, but I don't
> > really know what host they are looking for.  Neither
> > worked though, my Win2K
> > system works fine and with ipconfig tells me that
> > the default host is
> > rr.twmi.com (that's where I got it from).  After the
> > internet set up, the
> > applet has the connect to internet button which when
> > I click tries (for
> > about 20-30 seconds) to connect but with no luck.  I
> > did select auto dhcp,
> > when setting up.  A few times the applet actually
> > showed that something was
> > send, but no bytes received???  I am also not sure
> > that anything was ever
> > send, since there is no way for me to verify and the
> > applet might have a
> > different deffinition of send and consider no error
> > as send???  Am I missing
> > some steps here?  I did go through the archive and
> > found that I need to run
> > the
> > 'dhcpcd -d -n -h COxxx-A eth0'
> > command.  What is COxx-A are the x's need to be
> > subsituted, or is this a
> > litteral meaning?
> >
> > Thanks in advance to anyone that replies.
> >
> > Ilya Sterin
> >
>_
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >
>
>
>__
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
>a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com





RE: [newbie] LAN settings - (was: Setting up NIC under 7.2)

2001-02-04 Thread Jose M. Sanchez


Given that you have 4 machines set up to get their IP allocations via DHCP,
you must have initially contact the ISP and asked for 4 or 5 ip's.

SOME ISP's allocate IP's based upon the machines NAME...

Let's say you have a LAN with 9 computers, but the ISP is only giving you 5
IP's... 

In this case they would tell you to set the NAME of your computer to
something they know (or is in their database...) I.E.
ic-connect-@home-20322 ic-connect-@home-2033, etc.

In a situation such as this, you must set your Linux box up to utilize the
same hostname and domain as your ISP is expecting. In this manner your DHCP
client will be understood, and it will get an IP address...

You might want to refer to the @home DSL/CABLE howtos which discuss this in
detail.

-JMS


>  -Original Message-
> From: Rick Commo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 12:28 PM
> To:   Newbie
> Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  RE: [newbie] LAN settings - (was: Setting up NIC under 7.2)
> 
> Jose,
> 
> Thanks.  Yes, I had rebooted.  I still have to do some more playing
> around.  My knowledge in this whole area is just generally rather weak.  I
> would have presumed that the LinkSys actually provided the DNS server
> names once it got them from Verizon, my ISP.  
> 
> Currently I have all my machines (a whopping 4, including my laptop) set
> for DHCP so creating a hosts file is somewhat problematic unless there are
> some hosts semantics that I am not aware of.  
> 
> If it becomes too painful I will supply static IPs to all but the laptop.
> The laptop has to span 3 different environments and DHCP is required in 2
> out the 3.
> 
> Cheers,
> -rick
> 
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 1:32 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Newbie
> Subject:  RE: [newbie] LAN settings - (was: Setting up NIC under 7.2)
> 
> 
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 3:43 AM
> To:   Newbie
> Subject:  RE: [newbie] LAN settings - (was: Setting up NIC under 7.2)
> 
> Figured it out after a bit.  Either the mainboard has a bad PCI slot or
> the NIC was not seated properly.  More likely the latter.  I moved it to
> another slot and that made it happy.  I will try moving it back to the
> original slot at some point in future.
> 
> On to the next questions.
> 
> The network here consists of a DSL modem into a LinkSys Router/Switch.  I
> set eth0 up for DHCP and that seems to work, but I had to set the DNS
> manually.  Is this normal?
> [|JMS> ]  
> 
> Have you rebooted?
> 
> If you configured your eth0 card for dhcp address allocation, you might
> have to reboot to get DNS info from your ISP.
> 
> Some ISP's DHCP servers may also not be configured to provide this
> information to your machine.
> 
> Watch your machine's hostname after a reboot. If it changes to something
> you did not type in, your ISP is providing info...
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> My reason for asking is that my Win2K box is set up for DHCP and as part
> of getting its address it also gets the gateway and DNS addresses as well.
> So I did an ipconfig/all on the Win2K box as a quick and dirty way to
> print out the DNS servers.
> 
> [|JMS> ]  See above
> 
> 
> 
> Is it necessary to have a fully qualified domain when the machine is
> behind a router and part of a private network?  I can resolve names "out
> there" on the other side of the router, but my Linux box can't resolve the
> name of my Win2K box and they are both on the same subnet.
> 
> [|JMS> ]  
> 
> Yes and no.
> 
> Your Linux machine has to "know" about machines on your private lan. How
> you go about this is up to you. /etc/hosts is the quick and dirty way for
> small LANs. DNS/BIND with the DHCP update script is much more elegant.
> 
> Until you set up one or the other, Linux will not know about your other
> machines. For that matter Windows doesn't either.
> 
> Remember your ISP's DNS can't "see" your private LAN, so Linux has no way
> of obtaining HOST information unless you set something up.
> 
> 
> [|JMS> ]  -JMS
> 

 winmail.dat


RE: [newbie] LAN settings - (was: Setting up NIC under 7.2)

2001-02-04 Thread Rick Commo

Jose,

Thanks.  Yes, I had rebooted.  I still have to do some more playing around.
My knowledge in this whole area is just generally rather weak.  I would have
presumed that the LinkSys actually provided the DNS server names once it got
them from Verizon, my ISP.  

Currently I have all my machines (a whopping 4, including my laptop) set for
DHCP so creating a hosts file is somewhat problematic unless there are some
hosts semantics that I am not aware of.  

If it becomes too painful I will supply static IPs to all but the laptop.
The laptop has to span 3 different environments and DHCP is required in 2
out the 3.

Cheers,
-rick


>  -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 1:32 AM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Newbie
> Subject:      RE: [newbie] LAN settings - (was: Setting up NIC under 7.2)
> 
> 
> 
>  -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 3:43 AM
> To:   Newbie
> Subject:  RE: [newbie] LAN settings - (was: Setting up NIC under 7.2)
> 
> Figured it out after a bit.  Either the mainboard has a bad PCI slot or
> the NIC was not seated properly.  More likely the latter.  I moved it to
> another slot and that made it happy.  I will try moving it back to the
> original slot at some point in future.
> 
> On to the next questions.
> 
> The network here consists of a DSL modem into a LinkSys Router/Switch.  I
> set eth0 up for DHCP and that seems to work, but I had to set the DNS
> manually.  Is this normal?
> [|JMS> ]  
> 
> Have you rebooted?
> 
> If you configured your eth0 card for dhcp address allocation, you might
> have to reboot to get DNS info from your ISP.
> 
> Some ISP's DHCP servers may also not be configured to provide this
> information to your machine.
> 
> Watch your machine's hostname after a reboot. If it changes to something
> you did not type in, your ISP is providing info...
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> My reason for asking is that my Win2K box is set up for DHCP and as part
> of getting its address it also gets the gateway and DNS addresses as well.
> So I did an ipconfig/all on the Win2K box as a quick and dirty way to
> print out the DNS servers.
> 
> [|JMS> ]  See above
> 
> 
> 
> Is it necessary to have a fully qualified domain when the machine is
> behind a router and part of a private network?  I can resolve names "out
> there" on the other side of the router, but my Linux box can't resolve the
> name of my Win2K box and they are both on the same subnet.
> 
> [|JMS> ]  
> 
> Yes and no.
> 
> Your Linux machine has to "know" about machines on your private lan. How
> you go about this is up to you. /etc/hosts is the quick and dirty way for
> small LANs. DNS/BIND with the DHCP update script is much more elegant.
> 
> Until you set up one or the other, Linux will not know about your other
> machines. For that matter Windows doesn't either.
> 
> Remember your ISP's DNS can't "see" your private LAN, so Linux has no way
> of obtaining HOST information unless you set something up.
> 
> 
> [|JMS> ]  -JMS
> 

 winmail.dat


Re: [newbie] LAN + FTP: Troubles with Netscape and FTP

2000-08-03 Thread Pedro _


Thanks Greg!
It did not work. Problem stills. I also believe that should be a DNS 
problem. I will start the network configuration from the begining to be 
shure that it will not work.

Bye
pedro

>From: "Greg Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN + FTP: Troubles with Netscape and FTP
>Date: 25 Jul 2000 22:41:00 -
>
>I have seen the same problem occasionally... I think it may be a DNS 
>problem. This is a possible solution (no guarantees):
>
>On the linux box, in /etc/hosts add the ip address and host name of your 
>linux box, also add the host name and ip of your windows box.
>
>It could look somthing like this:
>
>
>192.168.0.2  localhost.localdomain localhost
>192.168.0.2  LinuxBox
>192.168.0.1  WindowsBox
>
>And, in linuxconf (can anyone tell I'm still stuck in Red Hat Land?)--in 
>terminal, su to root, type linuxconf [enter]--click 
>networking|host_name_search_path and make sure that hosts, DNS is selected.
>
>I'm not sure if this is the fix (when this happened to me, I was 
>experimenting on a machine with an unsupported video card, and didn't care 
>to fool around for very long with troubleshooting. I re-installed linux 
>attempting to fix the video 'cause I trashed the system entirely, and the 
>netscape thing worked without a problem)
>
>Hope that it helps!
>
>--Greg
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have a lan with:
> > 192.168.0.1 (PC with Windows 98 SE with a modem, with internet 
>connection
> > sharing)
> > 192.168.0.2 (PC with Linux Mandrake 7.02, that have internet access 
>through
> > the Windows PC).
> >
> > Problems:
> > When Win PC is disconnected from internet (dial-up modem), there are two
> > problems:
> >
> > 1. Netscape take a long time to open the mandrake local document (I have
> > changed to start with blank page, but it still open mandrake welcome
> > document)
> >
> > 2. I have wu-ftpd installed. Making FTP to localhost it take a long time 
>to
> > login.
> >
> > When Win PC is connected to internet everything is fine.
> >
> >
> > See attached my configuration files
> >
> >
> > What is wrong in my configuration?
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> > Pedro
>
>*
>Want free email? Sign up at http://www.freeze.com !
>


Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com




Re: [newbie] LAN + FTP: Troubles with Netscape and FTP

2000-07-29 Thread Greg Stewart

I have seen the same problem occasionally... I think it may be a DNS problem. This is 
a possible solution (no guarantees):

On the linux box, in /etc/hosts add the ip address and host name of your linux box, 
also add the host name and ip of your windows box.

It could look somthing like this:


192.168.0.2  localhost.localdomain localhost
192.168.0.2  LinuxBox
192.168.0.1  WindowsBox

And, in linuxconf (can anyone tell I'm still stuck in Red Hat Land?)--in terminal, su 
to root, type linuxconf [enter]--click networking|host_name_search_path and make sure 
that hosts, DNS is selected.

I'm not sure if this is the fix (when this happened to me, I was experimenting on a 
machine with an unsupported video card, and didn't care to fool around for very long 
with troubleshooting. I re-installed linux attempting to fix the video 'cause I 
trashed the system entirely, and the netscape thing worked without a problem)

Hope that it helps!

--Greg

> Hi!
> 
> I have a lan with:
> 192.168.0.1 (PC with Windows 98 SE with a modem, with internet connection 
> sharing)
> 192.168.0.2 (PC with Linux Mandrake 7.02, that have internet access through 
> the Windows PC).
> 
> Problems:
> When Win PC is disconnected from internet (dial-up modem), there are two 
> problems:
> 
> 1. Netscape take a long time to open the mandrake local document (I have 
> changed to start with blank page, but it still open mandrake welcome 
> document)
> 
> 2. I have wu-ftpd installed. Making FTP to localhost it take a long time to 
> login.
> 
> When Win PC is connected to internet everything is fine.
> 
> 
> See attached my configuration files
> 
> 
> What is wrong in my configuration?
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Pedro

*
Want free email? Sign up at http://www.freeze.com !




RE: [newbie] LAN connectivity

2000-06-18 Thread Jose M. Sanchez

Not enough information.

Your explanation is a little terse.

Have you enabled routing?
Have you set up Masq?

What are the IP's involved and all pertinent data.

What lines did you add for Masq?

Did you read the Masq howto?

Did you understand it heh... I'm being facetious...

(hey it IS complex, but you only need the simple example to get you going...
worry about firewall rules later...)

What/where is your DNS?

Etc., etc., etc.

-JMS


|-Original Message-
|From: Joe Lore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 11:38 AM
|To: Newbie@Linux-Mandrake. Com
|Subject: [newbie] LAN connectivity
|
|
|HI,
|
|I am using Mandrake 7.1 and I am having trouble getting connectivity to the
|net through my LAN.
|
|I currently use a Win 98 SE box with internet sharing to provide net to the
|entire LAN, however, when I provide the IP for that box as the default
|gateway it just simply does not work.
|
|Has anyone successfully done this, if so what should I be using where for
|settings, if not can anyone give me some tips on where to begin.
|
|
|Thanks
|
|Joe
|




RE: [RE: [newbie] LAN connectivity]

2000-06-18 Thread Joe Lore

How would I check that?

Joe


> -Original Message-
> From: Jaguar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 4:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [RE: [newbie] LAN connectivity]
> 
> 
> Did you uninstall/delete your LOCAL 127.0.0.1 loopback?
> 
> 
> "Joe Lore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One thing I noticed is that when I go to a term and type 
> 'netstat -ni' all
> I
> > see listed is l0 and no eth0.
> > 
> > I watched the boot load and saw "Bringing up interface eth0   
> OK" so what
> > could be the issue?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Joe
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fran
> > > Parker
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 1:41 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN connectivity
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Joe,
> > >
> > > Linux is so much better at sharing internet connections
> > > than windows...why not use the Linux box for that?
> > >
> > > If you need to use the Win98SE ... you will probably
> > > have to use proxies.  So much cleaner with ipchains.
> > > No proxies server...just pass/allow and deny as needed.
> > >
> > > Much easier, at least I think so.  There is an ipchains
> > > howto out there that explains it, if you are interested
> > > in switching.
> > >
> > > But if not, you will have to figure out the different proxies
> > > and set up proxies for your connection.
> > >
> > > There may be one other problem...I think the Win98SE
> > > internet sharing is only between Win98SE machines.
> > > I think I remember hearing that if you had a Win95/98 or
> > > Win3.x on your network that they would have to be
> > > upgraded or not be able to share the network with
> > > the Win98SE machine.  They may have fixed this,
> > > but I believe that is how it is.
> > >
> > > When I was in Win98, I opted for Proxyserver by
> > > AnalogX, very cool program.  And since we had
> > > several email addresses, we used older version
> > > of Wingate (single user was free).  Linux box, Win95,
> > > and a Win3.x were configured to use the proxies as
> > > laid out in Wingate and Proxyserver.  It was all free.
> > >
> > > So much easier now with ipchains...and it doesn't
> > > cost anything either.
> > >
> > > Just a few thoughts on it...but remember, I too am
> > > a newbie.
> > >
> > > Bambi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Joe Lore wrote:
> > >
> > > > HI,
> > > >
> > > > I am using Mandrake 7.1 and I am having trouble getting
> > > connectivity to the
> > > > net through my LAN.
> > > >
> > > > I currently use a Win 98 SE box with internet sharing to
> > > provide net to the
> > > > entire LAN, however, when I provide the IP for that box as 
> the default
> > > > gateway it just simply does not work.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone successfully done this, if so what should I be using
> > > where for
> > > > settings, if not can anyone give me some tips on where to begin.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Joe
> > >
> 
> 
> The Dogma chased the Stigma, and was hit by the Karma.
> 
> 
> Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at 
> http://webmail.netscape.com.
> 




Re: [newbie] LAN connectivity

2000-06-18 Thread Fran Parker

Can't help you there Joe, do not have Win98SE so I do not have this
setup that is unique to SE.

Like I was saying, I used third party programs to accomplish the same
thing since my windows box was the one with the modem.
Now I am on Linux and we use ipchains to accompish all of this so
much easier.  Client boxes, no matter what type of OS, do not have to
setup proxies to accomplish the connections...connection is direct
through ipchainsno more problems with socks protocols either.
Sorry.

Bambi

Joe Lore wrote:

> I saw the potion to set proxies in the install but now I cannot seem to find
> them.
>
> Where can I set the proxies?
>
> Thanks
>
> Joe
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fran
> > Parker
> > Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 1:41 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN connectivity
> >
> >
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > Linux is so much better at sharing internet connections
> > than windows...why not use the Linux box for that?
> >
> > If you need to use the Win98SE ... you will probably
> > have to use proxies.  So much cleaner with ipchains.
> > No proxies server...just pass/allow and deny as needed.
> >
> > Much easier, at least I think so.  There is an ipchains
> > howto out there that explains it, if you are interested
> > in switching.
> >
> > But if not, you will have to figure out the different proxies
> > and set up proxies for your connection.
> >
> > There may be one other problem...I think the Win98SE
> > internet sharing is only between Win98SE machines.
> > I think I remember hearing that if you had a Win95/98 or
> > Win3.x on your network that they would have to be
> > upgraded or not be able to share the network with
> > the Win98SE machine.  They may have fixed this,
> > but I believe that is how it is.
> >
> > When I was in Win98, I opted for Proxyserver by
> > AnalogX, very cool program.  And since we had
> > several email addresses, we used older version
> > of Wingate (single user was free).  Linux box, Win95,
> > and a Win3.x were configured to use the proxies as
> > laid out in Wingate and Proxyserver.  It was all free.
> >
> > So much easier now with ipchains...and it doesn't
> > cost anything either.
> >
> > Just a few thoughts on it...but remember, I too am
> > a newbie.
> >
> > Bambi
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Joe Lore wrote:
> >
> > > HI,
> > >
> > > I am using Mandrake 7.1 and I am having trouble getting
> > connectivity to the
> > > net through my LAN.
> > >
> > > I currently use a Win 98 SE box with internet sharing to
> > provide net to the
> > > entire LAN, however, when I provide the IP for that box as the default
> > > gateway it just simply does not work.
> > >
> > > Has anyone successfully done this, if so what should I be using
> > where for
> > > settings, if not can anyone give me some tips on where to begin.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Joe
> >




RE: [newbie] LAN connectivity

2000-06-18 Thread Neptali Barrios

Hi, I also need to do that, I share Internet connection when my two machines
are in Windows 98, I want to set up my Lan in linux, I don't know how to do
that, I want to share files, printer, Internet Connection, etc.  I am using
Linux Mandrake 7.0.

Please anyone help me, I need to set up my Lan in Linux, I want to use one
machine with Linux, like a server, and the other with Windows 9X


Neptali E. Barrios V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



- Original Message -
From: Fran Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN connectivity


> Hi Joe,
>
> Linux is so much better at sharing internet connections
> than windows...why not use the Linux box for that?
>
> If you need to use the Win98SE ... you will probably
> have to use proxies.  So much cleaner with ipchains.
> No proxies server...just pass/allow and deny as needed.
>
> Much easier, at least I think so.  There is an ipchains
> howto out there that explains it, if you are interested
> in switching.
>
> But if not, you will have to figure out the different proxies
> and set up proxies for your connection.
>
> There may be one other problem...I think the Win98SE
> internet sharing is only between Win98SE machines.
> I think I remember hearing that if you had a Win95/98 or
> Win3.x on your network that they would have to be
> upgraded or not be able to share the network with
> the Win98SE machine.  They may have fixed this,
> but I believe that is how it is.
>
> When I was in Win98, I opted for Proxyserver by
> AnalogX, very cool program.  And since we had
> several email addresses, we used older version
> of Wingate (single user was free).  Linux box, Win95,
> and a Win3.x were configured to use the proxies as
> laid out in Wingate and Proxyserver.  It was all free.
>
> So much easier now with ipchains...and it doesn't
> cost anything either.
>
> Just a few thoughts on it...but remember, I too am
> a newbie.
>
> Bambi
>
>
>
>
>
> Joe Lore wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> > I am using Mandrake 7.1 and I am having trouble getting connectivity to
the
> > net through my LAN.
> >
> > I currently use a Win 98 SE box with internet sharing to provide net to
the
> > entire LAN, however, when I provide the IP for that box as the default
> > gateway it just simply does not work.
> >
> > Has anyone successfully done this, if so what should I be using where
for
> > settings, if not can anyone give me some tips on where to begin.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Joe
>
>




RE: [newbie] LAN connectivity

2000-06-18 Thread Joe Lore

One thing I noticed is that when I go to a term and type 'netstat -ni' all I
see listed is l0 and no eth0.

I watched the boot load and saw "Bringing up interface eth0   OK" so what
could be the issue?

Thanks

Joe

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fran
> Parker
> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN connectivity
>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> Linux is so much better at sharing internet connections
> than windows...why not use the Linux box for that?
>
> If you need to use the Win98SE ... you will probably
> have to use proxies.  So much cleaner with ipchains.
> No proxies server...just pass/allow and deny as needed.
>
> Much easier, at least I think so.  There is an ipchains
> howto out there that explains it, if you are interested
> in switching.
>
> But if not, you will have to figure out the different proxies
> and set up proxies for your connection.
>
> There may be one other problem...I think the Win98SE
> internet sharing is only between Win98SE machines.
> I think I remember hearing that if you had a Win95/98 or
> Win3.x on your network that they would have to be
> upgraded or not be able to share the network with
> the Win98SE machine.  They may have fixed this,
> but I believe that is how it is.
>
> When I was in Win98, I opted for Proxyserver by
> AnalogX, very cool program.  And since we had
> several email addresses, we used older version
> of Wingate (single user was free).  Linux box, Win95,
> and a Win3.x were configured to use the proxies as
> laid out in Wingate and Proxyserver.  It was all free.
>
> So much easier now with ipchains...and it doesn't
> cost anything either.
>
> Just a few thoughts on it...but remember, I too am
> a newbie.
>
> Bambi
>
>
>
>
>
> Joe Lore wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> > I am using Mandrake 7.1 and I am having trouble getting
> connectivity to the
> > net through my LAN.
> >
> > I currently use a Win 98 SE box with internet sharing to
> provide net to the
> > entire LAN, however, when I provide the IP for that box as the default
> > gateway it just simply does not work.
> >
> > Has anyone successfully done this, if so what should I be using
> where for
> > settings, if not can anyone give me some tips on where to begin.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Joe
>




RE: [newbie] LAN connectivity

2000-06-18 Thread Joe Lore

I saw the potion to set proxies in the install but now I cannot seem to find
them.

Where can I set the proxies?

Thanks

Joe

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fran
> Parker
> Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] LAN connectivity
>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> Linux is so much better at sharing internet connections
> than windows...why not use the Linux box for that?
>
> If you need to use the Win98SE ... you will probably
> have to use proxies.  So much cleaner with ipchains.
> No proxies server...just pass/allow and deny as needed.
>
> Much easier, at least I think so.  There is an ipchains
> howto out there that explains it, if you are interested
> in switching.
>
> But if not, you will have to figure out the different proxies
> and set up proxies for your connection.
>
> There may be one other problem...I think the Win98SE
> internet sharing is only between Win98SE machines.
> I think I remember hearing that if you had a Win95/98 or
> Win3.x on your network that they would have to be
> upgraded or not be able to share the network with
> the Win98SE machine.  They may have fixed this,
> but I believe that is how it is.
>
> When I was in Win98, I opted for Proxyserver by
> AnalogX, very cool program.  And since we had
> several email addresses, we used older version
> of Wingate (single user was free).  Linux box, Win95,
> and a Win3.x were configured to use the proxies as
> laid out in Wingate and Proxyserver.  It was all free.
>
> So much easier now with ipchains...and it doesn't
> cost anything either.
>
> Just a few thoughts on it...but remember, I too am
> a newbie.
>
> Bambi
>
>
>
>
>
> Joe Lore wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> > I am using Mandrake 7.1 and I am having trouble getting
> connectivity to the
> > net through my LAN.
> >
> > I currently use a Win 98 SE box with internet sharing to
> provide net to the
> > entire LAN, however, when I provide the IP for that box as the default
> > gateway it just simply does not work.
> >
> > Has anyone successfully done this, if so what should I be using
> where for
> > settings, if not can anyone give me some tips on where to begin.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Joe
>




Re: [newbie] LAN connectivity

2000-06-18 Thread Fran Parker

Hi Joe,

Linux is so much better at sharing internet connections
than windows...why not use the Linux box for that?

If you need to use the Win98SE ... you will probably
have to use proxies.  So much cleaner with ipchains.
No proxies server...just pass/allow and deny as needed.

Much easier, at least I think so.  There is an ipchains
howto out there that explains it, if you are interested
in switching.

But if not, you will have to figure out the different proxies
and set up proxies for your connection.

There may be one other problem...I think the Win98SE
internet sharing is only between Win98SE machines.
I think I remember hearing that if you had a Win95/98 or
Win3.x on your network that they would have to be
upgraded or not be able to share the network with
the Win98SE machine.  They may have fixed this,
but I believe that is how it is.

When I was in Win98, I opted for Proxyserver by
AnalogX, very cool program.  And since we had
several email addresses, we used older version
of Wingate (single user was free).  Linux box, Win95,
and a Win3.x were configured to use the proxies as
laid out in Wingate and Proxyserver.  It was all free.

So much easier now with ipchains...and it doesn't
cost anything either.

Just a few thoughts on it...but remember, I too am
a newbie.

Bambi





Joe Lore wrote:

> HI,
>
> I am using Mandrake 7.1 and I am having trouble getting connectivity to the
> net through my LAN.
>
> I currently use a Win 98 SE box with internet sharing to provide net to the
> entire LAN, however, when I provide the IP for that box as the default
> gateway it just simply does not work.
>
> Has anyone successfully done this, if so what should I be using where for
> settings, if not can anyone give me some tips on where to begin.
>
> Thanks
>
> Joe




RE: [newbie] LAN Internet Connection

2000-02-24 Thread Pittman, Merle

First of all check to make sure that your NIC card is working

type "ifconfig"
if you don't see an output of info about eth0 (only loopback 127.0.0.0) then
your card is not working properly.  Run "linuxconf" to get it working (note
run this as root)

once you are sure your card is working, try to ping a server (ping
www.linux-mandrake.com) or something like that.  If that works then you are
in business.  Then you know that the problem has to be in your proxy
settings.  In your proxy settings make sure you ahve the correct port set
(port 80 usually for http)

> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Bookvich [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 2:18 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:  [newbie] LAN Internet Connection
> 
> **
> ***
> This electronic message and all contents contain information from the law
> firm of
> Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn which may be privileged, confidential or
> 
> otherwise protected from disclosure.  The information is intended to be
> for the 
> addressee only.  If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copy,
> distribution or 
> use of the contents of this message is prohibited.  If you have received
> this 
> electronic message in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the
> original
> message and all copies.
> **
> ***
> 
> Hello, if anyone could help me I would greatly appreciate it. 
> 
> I installed Mandrake Linux on a Dell Optiplex G1 machine, I am in a
> NetWare 4.1 environment, with NT DHCP server. There is a proxy server with
> a Sprint Raptor firewall. My Dell has a 3COM 3C905b nic. lothar "seems" to
> see the nic ok. I am trying to connect this machine to the internet
> through the proxy server using Netscape. Yes, I have put the proxy
> information in Netscape but when I try to access the internet I get a
> message that Netscape can't connect with the proxy server. If someone
> could give me a step by step how I would setup my machine to get internet
> access I would be a very happy camper. 
> ternet b
> Thanks a million,
> 
> Aaron Bookvich
> 
> P.S.
> I dont need to access NetWare just the internet but out of curiosity...
> Can Linux login to a NetWare 4.1 or 5 server and access print and file
> sharing? Thanks again.