RE: I should know this, but I don't....

[Steven M. Caesare]

You may indeed be right... I'll have to doublecheck.

-sc

-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I should know this, but I don't

Also check whether it's Local Service or LocalSystem. If it's Oracle, I
wouldn't be surprised if it was the latter rather than the former.
LocalSystem and Network Service both present the same on the network.
Local Service is anonymous.

Cheers
Ken


From: Steven M. Caesare [scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 8:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I should know this, but I don't

I tend to agree with you in that when the NetworkService was introduced,
that's the distinction I recall as well.

However, I just had one of my guys add the machine account to the file
perms of a shared dir last week, and the problem fixed right up... and
the process is running as local (some icky Oracle stuff).

Go figure.

Altho now I'm tempted to have my guy confirm for me it really was a
LocalService acct, and *NOT* NetworkService...

-sc

PS - Di you just change your nick? ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: I should know this, but I don't

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:
> Hmmm... we have remedied issues wherein processes running in the
context
> of LocalService need to dump files on to the network, and adding the
> machine account to the share perms solved it.

  Hmmm.  I admit I've never *tested* the LocalService account to
ensure it works the way Microsoft says it does.  And they don't
exactly have a stellar track record when it comes to security design.
Hmmm.  :-/  But anyway, MSFT claims: "It has minimum privileges on the
local computer and presents anonymous credentials on the network."

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684188(VS.85).aspx

-- Ven
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: I should know this, but I don't....

[Ken Schaefer]

Also check whether it's Local Service or LocalSystem. If it's Oracle, I 
wouldn't be surprised if it was the latter rather than the former. LocalSystem 
and Network Service both present the same on the network. Local Service is 
anonymous.

Cheers
Ken


From: Steven M. Caesare [scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June 2009 8:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I should know this, but I don't

I tend to agree with you in that when the NetworkService was introduced,
that's the distinction I recall as well.

However, I just had one of my guys add the machine account to the file
perms of a shared dir last week, and the problem fixed right up... and
the process is running as local (some icky Oracle stuff).

Go figure.

Altho now I'm tempted to have my guy confirm for me it really was a
LocalService acct, and *NOT* NetworkService...

-sc

PS - Di you just change your nick? ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: I should know this, but I don't

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:
> Hmmm... we have remedied issues wherein processes running in the
context
> of LocalService need to dump files on to the network, and adding the
> machine account to the share perms solved it.

  Hmmm.  I admit I've never *tested* the LocalService account to
ensure it works the way Microsoft says it does.  And they don't
exactly have a stellar track record when it comes to security design.
Hmmm.  :-/  But anyway, MSFT claims: "It has minimum privileges on the
local computer and presents anonymous credentials on the network."

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684188(VS.85).aspx

-- Ven
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: older HP server

[Ben Scott]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Len Hammond  wrote:
> Recently I picked up an older HP Netserver LH3. It has several Ultra 2
> SCSI drives in it. Can I put in U3 or U160 drives and have them work?

  The SCSI initiator negotiates any speed faster than "asynchronous"
(dog slow), so in theory, the drives should work.  The server will
negotiate Ultra 2 and the drive's SCSI interface will run at that
speed.

  That said, occasionally manufactures would assume you'd run at a
certain speed and their SCSI implementation would puke if they didn't
get it.  This is/was generally more common with tape drives.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: older HP server

[Len Hammond]

You're right about it being out of warranty. But getting parts is not a
problem - they are all over the web, and most of them are reasonably priced.
For a server that is not in a "mission critical" role, a certain amount of
downtime is acceptable to some clients. It's a "risk  v. cost" equation. It
wouldn't fit every situation but there are times to deploy a device like
this, admittedly, not very many, but.  And if it works for a while, this
client might see the value of a newer machine and several months from now
they expect the cash flow to improve. so who knows - it might be the step
that causes them to take it to the next level.


On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Brian Desmond wrote:

>  *And what do you do about the fact that the server is out of warranty and
> getting parts for it will be a challenge? *
>
> * *
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *Brian Desmond*
>
> *br...@briandesmond.com*
>
> * *
>
> *c - 312.731.3132*
>
> * *
>
> *From:* Len Hammond [mailto:lenhammo...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 8:28 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* older HP server
>
>
>
> I think hat I know the answer to this question but would like to verify
> it.  Recently I picked up an older HP Netserver LH3. It has several Ultra 2
> SCSI drives in it. Can I put in U3 or U160 drives and have them work? I know
> they are more expensive but I have several on hand with out a home. If I
> bump up the drive space I might have a client that could use it.
>
>
> --
> Len Hammond
> CSI:Hartland
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Len Hammond
CSI:Hartland

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Convert .imap to outlook

[Charlie Kaiser]

None of the converters I could find would touch a .imap file. Every
import/export tool I tried including the MS ones require access to the IMAP
server.

So I cheated. I renamed all the .imap files to .eml files and I'm dragging
them into OE and will burn to a PST. Sometimes you just gotta cheat...
LOL... Works perfectly...

***
Charlie Kaiser
charl...@golden-eagle.org
Kingman, AZ
***  

> -Original Message-
> From: Orland, Kathleen [mailto:korl...@rogers.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 6:44 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Convert .imap to outlook
> 
> If you're using Exchange 2007, you can use the Microsoft 
> Transporter Suite for internet mail although that talks about 
> an IMAP server. Have you tried exporting theimap mail files to .csv? 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 6:57 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Convert .imap to outlook
> 
> OK. I thought this would be simple...
> 
> Client has a folder full of subfolders full of .imap files, 
> along with a flags.dat and imapindex.dat file per folder. The 
> goal is to get all of these emails into OL 2003.
> 
> There are no other versions of this mail left. Don't ask. LOL...
> 
> Anyone got a reasonably simple process for this? I can't find 
> a way to import this stuff into an exchange mailbox or 
> outlook. The imap server is long gone...
> 
> ***
> Charlie Kaiser
> charl...@golden-eagle.org
> Kingman, AZ
> *** 
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource 
> hog! ~ ~ 
>   ~
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource 
> hog! ~ ~ 
>   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: I should know this, but I don't....

[Steven M. Caesare]

Indeed.

For "enterprise" software... Oracle does some downright goofy things.

I blame Larry.

-sc

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 6:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: I should know this, but I don't

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:
> the process is running as local (some icky Oracle stuff).

  Well, that might explain it right there.  Oracle can be pretty funky.

>> -- Ven
>
> PS - Di you just change your nick? ;-)

  I have a peach inspediment.  ;-)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Convert .imap to outlook

[Orland, Kathleen]

If you're using Exchange 2007, you can use the Microsoft Transporter Suite
for internet mail although that talks about an IMAP server. Have you tried
exporting theimap mail files to .csv? 



-Original Message-
From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 6:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Convert .imap to outlook

OK. I thought this would be simple...

Client has a folder full of subfolders full of .imap files, along with a
flags.dat and imapindex.dat file per folder. The goal is to get all of these
emails into OL 2003.

There are no other versions of this mail left. Don't ask. LOL...

Anyone got a reasonably simple process for this? I can't find a way to
import this stuff into an exchange mailbox or outlook. The imap server is
long gone...

***
Charlie Kaiser
charl...@golden-eagle.org
Kingman, AZ
*** 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: older HP server

[Brian Desmond]

And what do you do about the fact that the server is out of warranty and 
getting parts for it will be a challenge?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com

c - 312.731.3132

From: Len Hammond [mailto:lenhammo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 8:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: older HP server

I think hat I know the answer to this question but would like to verify it.  
Recently I picked up an older HP Netserver LH3. It has several Ultra 2 SCSI 
drives in it. Can I put in U3 or U160 drives and have them work? I know they 
are more expensive but I have several on hand with out a home. If I bump up the 
drive space I might have a client that could use it.

--
Len Hammond
CSI:Hartland





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

older HP server

[Len Hammond]

I think hat I know the answer to this question but would like to verify it.
Recently I picked up an older HP Netserver LH3. It has several Ultra 2 SCSI
drives in it. Can I put in U3 or U160 drives and have them work? I know they
are more expensive but I have several on hand with out a home. If I bump up
the drive space I might have a client that could use it.

-- 
Len Hammond
CSI:Hartland

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Script wireless settngs

[Jimmy Tran]

Does anyone know if it is possible to create a script that will run once
after sysprep is complete to configure wireless settings?

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Convert .imap to outlook

[Charlie Kaiser]

OK. I thought this would be simple...

Client has a folder full of subfolders full of .imap files, along with a
flags.dat and imapindex.dat file per folder. The goal is to get all of these
emails into OL 2003.

There are no other versions of this mail left. Don't ask. LOL...

Anyone got a reasonably simple process for this? I can't find a way to
import this stuff into an exchange mailbox or outlook. The imap server is
long gone...

***
Charlie Kaiser
charl...@golden-eagle.org
Kingman, AZ
*** 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: I should know this, but I don't....

[Ben Scott]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Steven M. Caesare  wrote:
> the process is running as local (some icky Oracle stuff).

  Well, that might explain it right there.  Oracle can be pretty funky.

>> -- Ven
>
> PS - Di you just change your nick? ;-)

  I have a peach inspediment.  ;-)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: I should know this, but I don't....

[Steven M. Caesare]

"Did"

-sc

-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 6:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: I should know this, but I don't

I tend to agree with you in that when the NetworkService was introduced,
that's the distinction I recall as well.

However, I just had one of my guys add the machine account to the file
perms of a shared dir last week, and the problem fixed right up... and
the process is running as local (some icky Oracle stuff).

Go figure.

Altho now I'm tempted to have my guy confirm for me it really was a
LocalService acct, and *NOT* NetworkService...

-sc

PS - Di you just change your nick? ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: I should know this, but I don't

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:
> Hmmm... we have remedied issues wherein processes running in the
context
> of LocalService need to dump files on to the network, and adding the
> machine account to the share perms solved it.

  Hmmm.  I admit I've never *tested* the LocalService account to
ensure it works the way Microsoft says it does.  And they don't
exactly have a stellar track record when it comes to security design.
Hmmm.  :-/  But anyway, MSFT claims: "It has minimum privileges on the
local computer and presents anonymous credentials on the network."

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684188(VS.85).aspx

-- Ven

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: I should know this, but I don't....

[Steven M. Caesare]

I tend to agree with you in that when the NetworkService was introduced,
that's the distinction I recall as well.

However, I just had one of my guys add the machine account to the file
perms of a shared dir last week, and the problem fixed right up... and
the process is running as local (some icky Oracle stuff).

Go figure.

Altho now I'm tempted to have my guy confirm for me it really was a
LocalService acct, and *NOT* NetworkService...

-sc

PS - Di you just change your nick? ;-)

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: I should know this, but I don't

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:
> Hmmm... we have remedied issues wherein processes running in the
context
> of LocalService need to dump files on to the network, and adding the
> machine account to the share perms solved it.

  Hmmm.  I admit I've never *tested* the LocalService account to
ensure it works the way Microsoft says it does.  And they don't
exactly have a stellar track record when it comes to security design.
Hmmm.  :-/  But anyway, MSFT claims: "It has minimum privileges on the
local computer and presents anonymous credentials on the network."

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684188(VS.85).aspx

-- Ven

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Windows 2003/Exchange 2003 to SBS 2008

[Jim Majorowicz]

I strongly recommend you look into Jeff Middleton's Swing Migration method.  
www.Sbsmigration.com

Also, if this is your first SBS 2008 install, I suggest you spend some time 
doing a dry run or two in a test lab.

-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows 2003/Exchange 2003 to SBS 2008

Anyone know of any guides on how to upgrade from Windows 2003 & Exchange 2003 
(Multiple servers) to SBS 2008 ?

Olly


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[Kurt Buff]

O

I'd like one of those.

Think of all the steamed dumplings you could cook!

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 15:06, Ben Scott  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:
> > Autoclaving ought to fix that right up for you...
>
>  We have an industrial autoclave at %WORK%.  It's almost big enough
> to drive a car into.  One of those Smart Cars might actually fit, come
> to think of it.  We could prolly autoclave the whole cubicle,
> furniture and all.  :)
>
> -- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[Ben Scott]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:
> Autoclaving ought to fix that right up for you...

  We have an industrial autoclave at %WORK%.  It's almost big enough
to drive a car into.  One of those Smart Cars might actually fit, come
to think of it.  We could prolly autoclave the whole cubicle,
furniture and all.  :)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Windows 2003/Exchange 2003 to SBS 2008

[Art DeKneef]

Microsoft has some guides and I think Jeff Middleton has updated his swing 
method for SBS2008.

Or you can look here for some early info.
http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sbs/standard-server-2003-migration-to-sbs-2008-part-1/


-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:oliver.marsh...@g2support.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows 2003/Exchange 2003 to SBS 2008

Anyone know of any guides on how to upgrade from Windows 2003 & Exchange 2003 
(Multiple servers) to SBS 2008 ?

Olly


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Windows 2003/Exchange 2003 to SBS 2008

[David]

There's a pretty thorough hashing of this at:

http://www.smallbizserver.net/Forums/tabid/53/forumid/103/postid/96644/view/topic/Default.aspx

One thing they talk about there is a possible migration of Exchange 2003 to
SBS2003, then a migration to SBS2008.  I'm in the process of using the
toolkit from www.sbsmigration.com to move from SBS03 to SBS08.

Good luck,

David



On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Oliver Marshall <
oliver.marsh...@g2support.com> wrote:

> Anyone know of any guides on how to upgrade from Windows 2003 & Exchange
> 2003 (Multiple servers) to SBS 2008 ?
>
> Olly
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~




-- 
David

_


I have a photographic memory.  It's just that some of
the film is out of date, and some is double-exposed.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Windows 2003/Exchange 2003 to SBS 2008

[Oliver Marshall]

Anyone know of any guides on how to upgrade from Windows 2003 & Exchange 2003 
(Multiple servers) to SBS 2008 ?

Olly


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[Kurt Buff]

Autoclaving ought to fix that right up for you...

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:24, David Mazzaccaro
 wrote:
>
> Just wondering how other people handle cell phone allocation in regards to 
> employee turnover?
> I've had some concerns over personal hygiene when an employee is given a 
> hand-me-down cell phone to use.
> When an employee leaves, does someone else (either their replacement or 
> another coworker) get their old cell phone?
> Does the phone go through a disinfecting process? Or is a new phone always 
> ordered and the old one disposed of?
> I guess the argument can be made for desk phones, keyboards, mice, chairs, 
> etc… but I've personally only had complaints about cell phones.
>
> Probably because you don't see people using their keyboard in the bathroom!
> LOL
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[Sam Cayze]

Yeah, but Lysol smells bad :)  And some chemicals are bad for plastics and 
electronics.  I'm not going to spray just any liquid on my $600 phone.  The 
special cleaning products for electronics are the same price as Lysol anyway.

-Sam



-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Sam Cayze  wrote:
> Lysol!?!  Yuck!
> They make special cleaning products for electronics.

  They make special audio cables for the iPod, too.  That doesn't mean they 
aren't the same as the regular audio cables except painted white.
 :)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: I should know this, but I don't....

[Ben Scott]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Steven M. Caesare  wrote:
> Hmmm... we have remedied issues wherein processes running in the context
> of LocalService need to dump files on to the network, and adding the
> machine account to the share perms solved it.

  Hmmm.  I admit I've never *tested* the LocalService account to
ensure it works the way Microsoft says it does.  And they don't
exactly have a stellar track record when it comes to security design.
Hmmm.  :-/  But anyway, MSFT claims: "It has minimum privileges on the
local computer and presents anonymous credentials on the network."

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684188(VS.85).aspx

-- Ven

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[Ben Scott]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Sam Cayze  wrote:
> Lysol!?!  Yuck!
> They make special cleaning products for electronics.

  They make special audio cables for the iPod, too.  That doesn't mean
they aren't the same as the regular audio cables except painted white.
 :)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Happy Fathers Day

[Ben Scott]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Tim Vander Kooi  wrote:
>> A AAA membership is a great Bday present..
>
> For those who have been fathers for decades, an AA membership may be more 
> appropriate. ;-)

  ROTFL!!

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[Ben Scott]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David Mazzaccaro
 wrote:
> Just wondering how other people handle cell phone allocation in regards to 
> employee turnover?

  New employee gets whatever the old employee has.  No
bio-disinfection is done.  This place is a dirty factory, so most
stuff is already filthy.

  Besides, once they see the company fridge in the break room, their
phone will be the least of their worries.  ;-)

  Sometimes VIPs get new equipment because they're VI.  And if the old
equipment is sufficiently busted up, I'll put in to replace it on the
grounds that it won't last anyway.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: I should know this, but I don't....

[Steven M. Caesare]

Hmmm... we have remedied issues wherein processes running in the context
of LocalService need to dump files on to the network, and adding the
machine account to the share perms solved it.

Interestinger and interestinger...

-sc

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:34 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: I should know this, but I don't
> 
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:50 PM, David Lum  wrote:
> > If I add a machine to a group (say, my SMS server as a local admin
to
> my desktop),
> > what am I exactly enabling?
> 
>   It means the NT machine account is now a member of that group.
> Nothing more, nothing less.
> 
> Machine accounts are just user accounts, as far as the NT security
> model is concerned.  If the machine is "FOO" and your domain is
> "NWEA", then the NT machine account is "NEWA\FOO$".  The dollar sign
> means it is hidden.
> 
>   Computer startup and shutdown scripts run in the context of the
> machine account when it comes to accessing network resources.  That's
> the major practical application that I'm aware of.
> 
> > Accounts logged in as "Local Service" to interact with my machine?
> 
>   Nope, that would be "FOO\LocalService", a different account and a
> different security authority.  LocalService isn't supposed to have
> access to any network resources.
> 
>   Now, theoretically, it may be that LocalService has sufficient
> privileges to hijack the machine account and impersonate it.
> Anything's possible with root access.
> 
> > Does it mean anyone logged onto that machine would have
> > local admin rights to my PC?
> 
>   Definitely not!  The NT machine account has nothing to do with the
> logged on user.
> 
> -- Ben
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: I should know this, but I don't....

[Ben Scott]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:50 PM, David Lum  wrote:
> If I add a machine to a group (say, my SMS server as a local admin to my 
> desktop),
> what am I exactly enabling?

  It means the NT machine account is now a member of that group.
Nothing more, nothing less.

Machine accounts are just user accounts, as far as the NT security
model is concerned.  If the machine is "FOO" and your domain is
"NWEA", then the NT machine account is "NEWA\FOO$".  The dollar sign
means it is hidden.

  Computer startup and shutdown scripts run in the context of the
machine account when it comes to accessing network resources.  That's
the major practical application that I'm aware of.

> Accounts logged in as “Local Service” to interact with my machine?

  Nope, that would be "FOO\LocalService", a different account and a
different security authority.  LocalService isn't supposed to have
access to any network resources.

  Now, theoretically, it may be that LocalService has sufficient
privileges to hijack the machine account and impersonate it.
Anything's possible with root access.

> Does it mean anyone logged onto that machine would have
> local admin rights to my PC?

  Definitely not!  The NT machine account has nothing to do with the
logged on user.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Happy Fathers Day

[Christopher Bodnar]

+1 on that.

 

 

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

  _  

From: john.c...@pfsf.org [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day

 

A AAA membership is a great Bday present.. 
John W. Cook 
Systems Administrator 
Partnership For Strong Families 
Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud

  _  

From: Len Hammond 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Sent: Mon Jun 22 15:54:42 2009
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day 

LOL!!  My oldest is 25 and he called last night with a dead car just a
mile from the house but I had to go and tow it home. You're right - it
doesn't stop when they get older - it just gets later.

 

Len

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Brumbaugh, Luke
 wrote:

That keeps happening when they get older too.

 

Starts withDad can you come get me

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:25 PM 


To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

 

And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)

 

  _  

From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day

Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until they
are married and gone.

 

Jon

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon Harris wrote:
> I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day
specially
> the first time Dads.
>
> Jon Harris

Just a hair over two months until D-day...

Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

 

 

 

 

 

**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by persons
or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy all copies
of this document. Thank you. 

Butler Animal Health Supply

**

 

 

 






-- 
Len Hammond
CSI:Hartland

 

 

 

  _  

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information
(PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission,
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This
information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws.
Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could
result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really
need to.



This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for
the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should
not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions
expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those
of the company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure
no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this
email or attachments.

 

 



-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: I should know this, but I don't....

[Christopher Bodnar]

Just like your user account has rights and permissions to resources, so do
computer accounts. And it depends on the credentials being passed. So if
the computer credentials are being passed to some process and that
computer account has permissions or rights, it will authenticate
successfully. 

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

  _  

From: david@nwea.org [mailto:david@nwea.org] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: I should know this, but I don't

 

If I add a machine to a group (say, my SMS server as a local admin to my
desktop), what am I exactly enabling? Accounts logged in as "Local
Service" to interact with my machine? Does it mean anyone logged onto that
machine would have local admin rights to my PC? I'm thinking no, but I
wouldn't bet my security on it.  This is where my knowledge of NT security
gets a little fuzzy.

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764

 

 

 



-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Happy Fathers Day

[Tim Vander Kooi]

For those who have been father���s for decades, an AA membership may be more 
appropriate. ;-)
TVK

From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day


A AAA membership is a great Bday present..
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud


From: Len Hammond
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Mon Jun 22 15:54:42 2009
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day
LOL!!  My oldest is 25 and he called last night with a dead car just a mile 
from the house but I had to go and tow it home. You're right - it doesn't stop 
when they get older - it just gets later.

Len
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Brumbaugh, Luke 
mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerahs.com>> wrote:

That keeps happening when they get older too.



Starts withDad can you come get me



From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:25 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day



And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)





From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day

Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until they are 
married and gone.



Jon

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff 
mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com>> wrote:

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon 
Harrismailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day specially
> the first time Dads.
>
> Jon Harris

Just a hair over two months until D-day...

Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~











**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is intended 
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document. Thank you.

Butler Animal Health Supply

**









--
Len Hammond
CSI:Hartland






CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.


This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. 
Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are 
present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or 
damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Kurt Buff]

The lesson for today is:

Beware of acronyms...

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 13:00, John Hornbuckle
 wrote:
>
> Itÿÿ™s had a pretty strong startÿÿ¦
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:30 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> But It's Not Good!
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:28, Stu Sjouwerman  
> wrote:
>
> "The new Microsoft search engine was called BING = Because It's Not Google!"
> -- Denis Barsalo, WServerNews subscriber
>
>
>
> Warm regards,
>
>
> Stu Sjouwerman
> Founder, VP Marketing.
> P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
> F: +1-727-562-5199
> s...@sunbelt-software.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
>
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:43 PM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> I think it is supposed to represent the sound the light bulb makes when it 
> goes off over a personÿÿ™s head.
>
> TVK
>
>
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>
> Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a bit 
> silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for me.
>
> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name 
> and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm 
> interested to know who is.
>
> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their 
> marketing/ad agencies...
>
> --
> ME2
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze  wrote:
>
> Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>
> Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
> Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
> know which oneÿÿâÿ™m going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications 
> to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the 
> public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to 
> public disclosure.
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Happy Fathers Day

[John Cook]

A AAA membership is a great Bday present..
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
Sent to you from my Blackberry in the Cloud


From: Len Hammond
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Mon Jun 22 15:54:42 2009
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day

LOL!!  My oldest is 25 and he called last night with a dead car just a mile 
from the house but I had to go and tow it home. You're right - it doesn't stop 
when they get older - it just gets later.

Len

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Brumbaugh, Luke 
mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerahs.com>> wrote:

That keeps happening when they get older too.



Starts withDad can you come get me��



From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:25 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day



And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)





From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day

Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until they are 
married and gone.



Jon

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff 
mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com>> wrote:

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon 
Harrismailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day specially
> the first time Dads.
>
> Jon Harris

Just a hair over two months until D-day...

Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~











**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is intended 
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document. Thank you.

Butler Animal Health Supply

**









--
Len Hammond
CSI:Hartland






CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, 
dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this 
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without 
the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may 
be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 
(HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or 
disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties.
Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the company. 
Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are 
present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or 
damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[John Hornbuckle]

�s had a pretty strong sta�



From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

But It's Not Good!
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:28, Stu Sjouwerman 
mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com>> wrote:
"The new Microsoft search engine was called BING = Because It's Not Google!"
-- Denis Barsalo, WServerNews subscriber

Warm regards,


Stu Sjouwerman
Founder, VP Marketing.
P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
F: +1-727-562-5199
s...@sunbelt-software.com






From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:43 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)


I think it is supposed to represent the sound the light bulb makes when it goes 
off over a person���s head.

TVK



From: Micheal Espinola Jr 
[mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)



I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a bit 
silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name and 
what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm interested 
to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their 
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com>> wrote:

Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.





From: John Aldrich 
[mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
know which one�m going to (keep) using. ���



[cid:image001.jpg@01C9F352.A20FC4A0][cid:image002@01c9f352.a20fc4a0]



From: Micheal Espinola Jr 
[mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)



http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2





Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
06:54:00























.












NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to 
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and 
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public 
disclosure.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~
<><>

Re: Happy Fathers Day

[Len Hammond]

LOL!!  My oldest is 25 and he called last night with a dead car just a mile
from the house but I had to go and tow it home. You're right - it doesn't
stop when they get older - it just gets later.

Len

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Brumbaugh, Luke <
luke.brumba...@butlerahs.com> wrote:

>  That keeps happening when they get older too.
>
>
>
> Starts with “Dad can you come get me…”
>
>
>
> *From:* Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 12:25 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Happy Fathers Day
>
>
>
> And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Happy Fathers Day
>
> Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until they
> are married and gone.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon Harris wrote:
> > I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day
> specially
> > the first time Dads.
> >
> > Jon Harris
>
> Just a hair over two months until D-day...
>
> Kurt
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is
> intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
> than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
> please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document. Thank
> you.
>
> Butler Animal Health Supply
>
> **
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Len Hammond
CSI:Hartland

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

I should know this, but I don't....

[David Lum]

If I add a machine to a group (say, my SMS server as a local admin to my 
desktop), what am I exactly enabling? Accounts logged in as "Local Service" to 
interact with my machine? Does it mean anyone logged onto that machine would 
have local admin rights to my PC? I'm thinking no, but I wouldn't bet my 
security on it.  This is where my knowledge of NT security gets a little 
fuzzy...
David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Kurt Buff]

But It's Not Good!

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:28, Stu Sjouwerman wrote:

>  "The new Microsoft search engine was called BING = Because It's Not
> Google!"
> -- Denis Barsalo, WServerNews subscriber
>
> Warm regards,
>
>
> Stu Sjouwerman
> Founder, VP Marketing.
> P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
> F: +1-727-562-5199
> s...@sunbelt-software.com
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
> *From:* Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 2:43 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>  I think it is supposed to represent the sound the light bulb makes when
> it goes off over a person’s head.
>
> TVK
>
>
>
> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a bit
> silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for
> me.
>
> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name
> and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm
> interested to know who is.
>
> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
> marketing/ad agencies...
>
> --
> ME2
>
>  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
> wrote:
>
> Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>
> *Subject:* RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
> Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess
> I know which one I’m going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools]
>
>
>
> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Deb Shinder]

Good one!

DS

 

From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:s...@sunbelt-software.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

"The new Microsoft search engine was called BING = Because It's Not
Google!"
-- Denis Barsalo, WServerNews subscriber

 

Warm regards,


Stu Sjouwerman
Founder, VP Marketing.
P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
F: +1-727-562-5199
s...@sunbelt-software.com


  

 

 



From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

I think it is supposed to represent the sound the light bulb makes when
it goes off over a person's head.

TVK

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a
bit silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word
association for me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this
name and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but
I'm interested to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
wrote:

Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
URL.

 



From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
Guess I know which one I'm going to (keep) using. J

 

  

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
06/22/09 06:54:00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Stu Sjouwerman]

"The new Microsoft search engine was called BING = Because It's Not
Google!"
-- Denis Barsalo, WServerNews subscriber
 
Warm regards,


Stu Sjouwerman
Founder, VP Marketing.
P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
F: +1-727-562-5199
s...@sunbelt-software.com


  
 



From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)



I think it is supposed to represent the sound the light bulb makes when
it goes off over a person's head.

TVK

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a
bit silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word
association for me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this
name and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but
I'm interested to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2



On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
wrote:

Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
URL.

 



From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
Guess I know which one I'm going to (keep) using. J

 

  

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
06/22/09 06:54:00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




..
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Don Guyer]

who along with David Bowie (who???) did one of the best Xmas songs ever...

:)

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com


-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Nah - to me it sounds like some really old guy from Spokane - a
singer/actor the younger folks here won't remember...

Kurt

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:39, Kim Longenbaugh  wrote:
>
> Bing, bing, bing���.Ricochet Rabbit!
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorl��  Google sounded a bit 
> silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for me.
>
> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name 
> and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm 
> interested to know who is.
>
> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their 
> marketing/ad agencies...
>
> --
> ME2
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze  wrote:
>
> Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>
> Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
> Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
> know which one�m going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Steven M. Caesare]

Both of those will annoy the web filter...

 

-sc

 

From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

Just start typo'ing the "i" to the other side. Then puff...puff...pass.
;-)

TVK

 

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

I've already fat fingered it "bung" at least once.

 

Just sayin'...

 

;-)

 

-sc

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a
bit silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word
association for me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this
name and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but
I'm interested to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
wrote:

Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
URL.

 



From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
Guess I know which one I'm going to (keep) using. J

 

  

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
06/22/09 06:54:00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Maglinger, Paul]

heh...
 
Facts about Bong 
 
Bong is a leading manufacturer in the European envelope industry, which
is worth around EUR 2 billion annually and has a total volume in the
range of 100 billion envelopes. The UK, German and French markets
account for nearly 70 percent of the total European envelope market. As
for overprinting, Bong's goal is to build a network of operations in
Europe through organic growth and acquisitions. 
 

 


From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 1:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)



Both of those will annoy the web filter...

 

-sc

 

From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

Just start typo'ing the "i" to the other side. Then puff...puff...pass.
;-)

TVK

 

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

I've already fat fingered it "bung" at least once.

 

Just sayin'...

 

;-)

 

-sc

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a
bit silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word
association for me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this
name and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but
I'm interested to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
wrote:

Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
URL.

 



From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
Guess I know which one I'm going to (keep) using. J

 

  

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
06/22/09 06:54:00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[Sam Cayze]

I disinfect everything here.  Keyboards, cell phone, mice, laptops
before a turnover.  
 
With our cell phones, at least Treos, I sometimes replace the
shell/housing of the phone with a new one if it is pretty beat up from
the previous owner.  Maybe it's just me, but I don't like giving people
beat up equipment.
 
-Sam



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 1:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cell phone allocation and turnover?



Just wondering how other people handle cell phone allocation in regards
to employee turnover? 
I've had some concerns over personal hygiene when an employee is given a
hand-me-down cell phone to use. 
When an employee leaves, does someone else (either their replacement or
another coworker) get their old cell phone? 
Does the phone go through a disinfecting process? Or is a new phone
always ordered and the old one disposed of? 
I guess the argument can be made for desk phones, keyboards, mice,
chairs, etc... but I've personally only had complaints about cell
phones.

Probably because you don't see people using their keyboard in the
bathroom! 
LOL


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Don Guyer]

That's why it was so special!

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com


-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

That duet was an unholy union!



-Original Message-
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

who along with David Bowie (who???) did one of the best Xmas songs ever...

:)

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com


-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Nah - to me it sounds like some really old guy from Spokane - a
singer/actor the younger folks here won't remember...

Kurt

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:39, Kim Longenbaugh  wrote:
>
> Bing, bing, bing.Ricochet Rabbit!
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorl Google sounded a bit silly 
> to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for me.
>
> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name 
> and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm 
> interested to know who is.
>
> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their 
> marketing/ad agencies...
>
> --
> ME2
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze  wrote:
>
> Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>
> Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
> Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
> know which onm going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to 
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and 
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public 
disclosure.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Kim Longenbaugh]

No, you're thinking of Rosie and her girlfriend...

-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 1:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

That duet was an unholy union!



-Original Message-
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

who along with David Bowie (who???) did one of the best Xmas songs
ever...

:)

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com


-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Nah - to me it sounds like some really old guy from Spokane - a
singer/actor the younger folks here won't remember...

Kurt

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:39, Kim Longenbaugh
 wrote:
>
> Bing, bing, bing.Ricochet Rabbit!
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorl Google sounded a
bit silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word
association for me.
>
> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this
name and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but
I'm interested to know who is.
>
> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
marketing/ad agencies...
>
> --
> ME2
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
wrote:
>
> Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
URL.
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>
> Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
> Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
Guess I know which onm going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
06/22/09 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written
communications to or from this entity are public records that will be
disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail
communications may be subject to public disclosure.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[John Hornbuckle]

That duet was an unholy union!



-Original Message-
From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

who along with David Bowie (who???) did one of the best Xmas songs ever...

:)

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com


-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Nah - to me it sounds like some really old guy from Spokane - a
singer/actor the younger folks here won't remember...

Kurt

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:39, Kim Longenbaugh  wrote:
>
> Bing, bing, bing�.Ricochet Rabbit!
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorl Google sounded a 
> bit silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association 
> for me.
>
> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name 
> and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm 
> interested to know who is.
>
> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their 
> marketing/ad agencies...
>
> --
> ME2
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze  wrote:
>
> Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>
> Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
> Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
> know which onm going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to 
or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and 
the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public 
disclosure.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Kurt Buff]

Nah - to me it sounds like some really old guy from Spokane - a
singer/actor the younger folks here won't remember...

Kurt

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:39, Kim Longenbaugh  wrote:
>
> Bing, bing, bing….Ricochet Rabbit!
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a bit 
> silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for me.
>
> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name 
> and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm 
> interested to know who is.
>
> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their 
> marketing/ad agencies...
>
> --
> ME2
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze  wrote:
>
> Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
>
> Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
> Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
> know which one I’m going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Tim Vander Kooi]

Just start typo'ing the "i" to the other side. Then puff...puff...pass. ;-)
TVK

From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:33 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

I've already fat fingered it "bung" at least once.

Just sayin'...

;-)

-sc

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a bit 
silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name and 
what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm interested 
to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their 
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com>> wrote:
Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.


From: John Aldrich 
[mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
know which one I'm going to (keep) using. :)



[cid:image001.jpg@01C9F33F.82B810C0][cid:image002@01c9f33f.82b810c0]



From: Micheal Espinola Jr 
[mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)



http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2





Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
06:54:00


















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Tim Vander Kooi]

I think it is supposed to represent the sound the light bulb makes when it goes 
off over a person's head.
TVK

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a bit 
silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name and 
what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm interested 
to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their 
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com>> wrote:
Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled URL.


From: John Aldrich 
[mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
know which one I'm going to (keep) using. :)



[cid:image001.jpg@01C9F33F.582070A0][cid:image002@01c9f33f.582070a0]



From: Micheal Espinola Jr 
[mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)



http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2





Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
06:54:00














~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[Sam Cayze]

Lysol!?!  Yuck!
 
They make special cleaning products for electronics.  Spray and wipes.  
 
 



From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 1:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cell phone allocation and turnover?



Well, that's not a problem here as we don't provide cell phones for
people. J Where I used to work, when phones were provided for us, I seem
to recall that we recycled the phones (I wasn't involved - the Executive
Assistant to the CEO handled the phones) and just handed them to the
next person without any real disinfecting, etc. 

 

My suggestion would be to make sure they were completely powered off
(i.e. remove the battery) and then spray lightly with Lysol and let it
dry. 

 

  

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

 

Just wondering how other people handle cell phone allocation in regards
to employee turnover? 
I've had some concerns over personal hygiene when an employee is given a
hand-me-down cell phone to use. 
When an employee leaves, does someone else (either their replacement or
another coworker) get their old cell phone? 
Does the phone go through a disinfecting process? Or is a new phone
always ordered and the old one disposed of? 
I guess the argument can be made for desk phones, keyboards, mice,
chairs, etc... but I've personally only had complaints about cell
phones.

Probably because you don't see people using their keyboard in the
bathroom! 
LOL

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
06/22/09 06:54:00

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[John Aldrich]

Well, that's not a problem here as we don't provide cell phones for people.
J Where I used to work, when phones were provided for us, I seem to recall
that we recycled the phones (I wasn't involved - the Executive Assistant to
the CEO handled the phones) and just handed them to the next person without
any real disinfecting, etc. 

 

My suggestion would be to make sure they were completely powered off (i.e.
remove the battery) and then spray lightly with Lysol and let it dry. 

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

 

Just wondering how other people handle cell phone allocation in regards to
employee turnover? 
I've had some concerns over personal hygiene when an employee is given a
hand-me-down cell phone to use. 
When an employee leaves, does someone else (either their replacement or
another coworker) get their old cell phone? 
Does the phone go through a disinfecting process? Or is a new phone always
ordered and the old one disposed of? 
I guess the argument can be made for desk phones, keyboards, mice, chairs,
etc. but I've personally only had complaints about cell phones.

Probably because you don't see people using their keyboard in the bathroom! 
LOL

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09
06:54:00


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[David Mazzaccaro]

so... what do you about new employee's cell phones?



From: Jake Gardner [mailto:jgard...@ttcdas.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cell phone allocation and turnover?



I've seen people leave the bathroom without washing their hands.  I
always trash keyboards and mice when employees leave.  Frankly, if I
spot a really nasty keyboard or mouse when I sit at someone's desk, my
next stop is the bathroom to wash my hands.  I hate using the
anti-bacterial crap.

 

Thanks,

 

Jake Gardner

TTC Network Administrator

Ext. 246



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

 

Just wondering how other people handle cell phone allocation in regards
to employee turnover? 
I've had some concerns over personal hygiene when an employee is given a
hand-me-down cell phone to use. 
When an employee leaves, does someone else (either their replacement or
another coworker) get their old cell phone? 
Does the phone go through a disinfecting process? Or is a new phone
always ordered and the old one disposed of? 
I guess the argument can be made for desk phones, keyboards, mice,
chairs, etc... but I've personally only had complaints about cell
phones.

Probably because you don't see people using their keyboard in the
bathroom! 
LOL

 

 
***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** 
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.? If you are not
the addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you
may not disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by
reply e-mail or by telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message
and any copies.? 

Thank you.

***

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[Jake Gardner]

I've seen people leave the bathroom without washing their hands.  I
always trash keyboards and mice when employees leave.  Frankly, if I
spot a really nasty keyboard or mouse when I sit at someone's desk, my
next stop is the bathroom to wash my hands.  I hate using the
anti-bacterial crap.

 

Thanks,

 

Jake Gardner

TTC Network Administrator

Ext. 246



From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 2:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Cell phone allocation and turnover?

 

Just wondering how other people handle cell phone allocation in regards
to employee turnover? 
I've had some concerns over personal hygiene when an employee is given a
hand-me-down cell phone to use. 
When an employee leaves, does someone else (either their replacement or
another coworker) get their old cell phone? 
Does the phone go through a disinfecting process? Or is a new phone
always ordered and the old one disposed of? 
I guess the argument can be made for desk phones, keyboards, mice,
chairs, etc... but I've personally only had complaints about cell
phones.

Probably because you don't see people using their keyboard in the
bathroom! 
LOL

 

 

***Teletronics Technology Corporation*** 
This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.  If you are not the 
addressee or authorized by the addressee to receive this e-mail, you may not 
disclose, copy, distribute, or use this e-mail. If you have received this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or by 
telephone at 267-352-2020 and destroy this message and any copies.  

Thank you.

***



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Cell phone allocation and turnover?

[David Mazzaccaro]

Just wondering how other people handle cell phone allocation in regards
to employee turnover?
I've had some concerns over personal hygiene when an employee is given a
hand-me-down cell phone to use.
When an employee leaves, does someone else (either their replacement or
another coworker) get their old cell phone?
Does the phone go through a disinfecting process? Or is a new phone
always ordered and the old one disposed of? 
I guess the argument can be made for desk phones, keyboards, mice,
chairs, etc... but I've personally only had complaints about cell
phones.
Probably because you don't see people using their keyboard in the
bathroom!
LOL


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Has anyone seen....

[Kelsey, John]

His sidekick was named Lymangood a.k.a JAFO (played by Daniel Stern)

***
John C. Kelsey
DuBois Regional Medical Center
(:  814.375.3073  
*:   jckel...@drmc.org 
***


-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 14:07
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Has anyone seen


On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Daniel Rodriguez 
wrote:
> What does the FE stand for?

  There's a scene from the movie /Blue Thunder/ where the sidekick guy
asks Roy Scheider that exact same question:

Sidekick: "What's the F.E. stand for?"
Scheider : "F*ck everybody."

  (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)

  (Hey, did you know Roy Scheider died last year?  I missed that. Damn.
You know you're getting old when all the movie stars start
dieing.)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
  ~
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Has anyone seen....

[Ben Scott]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Daniel Rodriguez  wrote:
> What does the FE stand for?

  There's a scene from the movie /Blue Thunder/ where the sidekick guy
asks Roy Scheider that exact same question:

Sidekick: "What's the F.E. stand for?"
Scheider : "F*ck everybody."

  (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)

  (Hey, did you know Roy Scheider died last year?  I missed that.
Damn.  You know you're getting old when all the movie stars start
dieing.)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Happy Fathers Day

[Kurt Buff]

That's the rumor I've heard.

Personally, I'm laying in a large supply of duct tape and velcro.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:14, Jon Harris  wrote:
>
> Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until they are 
> married and gone.
>
> Jon
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon Harris wrote:
>> > I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day specially
>> > the first time Dads.
>> >
>> > Jon Harris
>>
>> Just a hair over two months until D-day...
>>
>> Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Happy Fathers Day

[Kurt Buff]

A night in jail or a long walk never killed a kid.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:40, Kim Longenbaugh  wrote:
>
> And usually involves money, either for gas or bail.
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerahs.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:35 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day
>
>
>
> That keeps happening when they get older too.
>
>
>
> Starts with “Dad can you come get me…”
>
>
>
> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:25 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day
>
>
>
> And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)
>
>
>
> 
>
> From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day
>
> Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until they are 
> married and gone.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon Harris wrote:
> > I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day specially
> > the first time Dads.
> >
> > Jon Harris
>
> Just a hair over two months until D-day...
>
> Kurt
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is 
> intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may 
> contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
> dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other 
> than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, 
> please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document. Thank you.
>
> Butler Animal Health Supply
>
> **
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Wireshark 1.2 available

[Webster]

Wireshark 1.2 available for download:

 

http://www.wireshark.org/download.html

 

 

Webster


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Micheal Espinola Jr]

Kudus to Microsoft if thats true.

--
ME2


On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Link wrote:

> When I first heard of the name for MS's "new" "decision" engine I thought
> of Groundhog Day when Stephen Tobolowsky's (
> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0864997/) character says bing after every right
> answer.
> The character was designed to be harmless, but annoying.  Good job
> Microsoft!
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
> michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a bit
>> silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for
>> me.
>>
>> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this
>> name and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm
>> interested to know who is.
>>
>> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
>> marketing/ad agencies...
>>
>> --
>> ME2
>>
>>
>>  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze wrote:
>>
>>>  Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
>>> URL.
>>>
>>>  --
>>>  *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>>> *Subject:* RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>>>
>>>Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
>>> Guess I know which one I’m going to (keep) using. J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
>>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>>> *Subject:* Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>>>
>>> --
>>> ME2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
>>> 06/22/09 06:54:00
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Jonathan Link]

When I first heard of the name for MS's "new" "decision" engine I thought of
Groundhog Day when Stephen Tobolowsky's
(http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0864997/) character
says bing after every right answer.
The character was designed to be harmless, but annoying.  Good job
Microsoft!

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a bit
> silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for
> me.
>
> I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name
> and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm
> interested to know who is.
>
> I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
> marketing/ad agencies...
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze wrote:
>
>>  Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
>> URL.
>>
>>  --
>>  *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>>
>>Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
>> Guess I know which one I’m going to (keep) using. J
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools]
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>>
>> --
>> ME2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09
>> 06:54:00
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Has anyone seen....

[Jay Dale]

Same thing.

-Original Message-
From: Art DeKneef [mailto:art.dekn...@cox.net] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:39 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Has anyone seen

How about Windows Server 2008 Foundation Edition.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/foundation.aspx



-Original Message-
From: Jay Dale [mailto:jd...@xpresstel.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 8:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Has anyone seen

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/dd252609.aspx


-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Has anyone seen

Holy cow. Google is turning up a Windows FE edition. Forensics
Environment.

http://grandstreamdreams.blogspot.com/2009/02/windows-fe-details-teased-
out-of-web.html



> -Original Message-
> From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:15 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Has anyone seen
> 
> Only "premium" that I am aware of is "small business server
> premium"
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Ognenoff [mailto:andyognen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:03 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Has anyone seen
> 
> Haven't heard of Windows 2008 Premium either...
> 
>
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/editions-overview.aspx
> 
> Could it be you're using the wrong combination of media/keys? The only
> reference to FE I've seen is "Front End" when you're talking about a
> Front End/Back End configuration.
> 
> - Andy O.
> 
> From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:45 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Has anyone seen
> 
> Sorry, technician is onsite and I got my wires crossed...
> 
> He is trying to install Windows 2008 Premium, but it is coming up
> saying
> Windows 2008 FE.
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>   ~
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Micheal Espinola Jr]

ooo, I just searched for "Microsoft COFEE download".  Google came back with
a response instantly.  Bing took * 7 * full seconds.

--
ME2


On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:12 PM, John Aldrich  wrote:

>  Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
> Guess I know which one I’m going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools]
>
>
>
> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Happy Fathers Day

[Maglinger, Paul]

tow truck... 



From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day



And usually involves money, either for gas or bail.

 



From: Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerahs.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

 

That keeps happening when they get older too.

 

Starts with "Dad can you come get me..."

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

 

And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)

 



From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day

Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until
they are married and gone.

 

Jon

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon Harris wrote:
> I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day
specially
> the first time Dads.
>
> Jon Harris

Just a hair over two months until D-day...

Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

 

 

 

 

 

**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If
you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy all
copies of this document. Thank you. 

Butler Animal Health Supply

**

 

 

 

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Happy Fathers Day

[Owens, Michael]

Speaking as a fresh college gradaute, (member of the younger crowd) I have 
never called my dad asking for bail money.

I ask my friends. My dad would kill me. ;)


From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

And usually involves money, either for gas or bail.


From: Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerahs.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

That keeps happening when they get older too.

Starts with "Dad can you come get me..."

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)


From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day
Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until they are 
married and gone.

Jon
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff 
mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon 
Harrismailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day specially
> the first time Dads.
>
> Jon Harris
Just a hair over two months until D-day...

Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~










**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is intended 
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document. Thank you.

Butler Animal Health Supply

**












This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and
thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance
with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Has anyone seen....

[Art DeKneef]

How about Windows Server 2008 Foundation Edition.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/foundation.aspx



-Original Message-
From: Jay Dale [mailto:jd...@xpresstel.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 8:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Has anyone seen

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/dd252609.aspx


-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Has anyone seen

Holy cow. Google is turning up a Windows FE edition. Forensics
Environment.

http://grandstreamdreams.blogspot.com/2009/02/windows-fe-details-teased-
out-of-web.html



> -Original Message-
> From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:15 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Has anyone seen
> 
> Only "premium" that I am aware of is "small business server
> premium"
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Ognenoff [mailto:andyognen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:03 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Has anyone seen
> 
> Haven't heard of Windows 2008 Premium either...
> 
>
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/editions-overview.aspx
> 
> Could it be you're using the wrong combination of media/keys? The only
> reference to FE I've seen is "Front End" when you're talking about a
> Front End/Back End configuration.
> 
> - Andy O.
> 
> From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:45 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Has anyone seen
> 
> Sorry, technician is onsite and I got my wires crossed...
> 
> He is trying to install Windows 2008 Premium, but it is coming up
> saying
> Windows 2008 FE.
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>   ~
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Happy Fathers Day

[Kim Longenbaugh]

And usually involves money, either for gas or bail.

 



From: Brumbaugh, Luke [mailto:luke.brumba...@butlerahs.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

 

That keeps happening when they get older too.

 

Starts with "Dad can you come get me..."

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

 

And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)

 



From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day

Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until
they are married and gone.

 

Jon

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon Harris wrote:
> I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day
specially
> the first time Dads.
>
> Jon Harris

Just a hair over two months until D-day...

Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

 

 

 

 

 

**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If
you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy all
copies of this document. Thank you. 

Butler Animal Health Supply

**

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Kim Longenbaugh]

Bing, bing, bingRicochet Rabbit!

 



From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a
bit silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word
association for me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this
name and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but
I'm interested to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2



On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
wrote:

Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
URL.

 



From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
Guess I know which one I'm going to (keep) using. :-)

 

  

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
06/22/09 06:54:00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Happy Fathers Day

[Brumbaugh, Luke]

That keeps happening when they get older too.

Starts with "Dad can you come get me..."

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)


From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day
Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until they are 
married and gone.

Jon
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff 
mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon 
Harrismailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day specially
> the first time Dads.
>
> Jon Harris
Just a hair over two months until D-day...

Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~










**
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information transmitted in this message is 
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document.  Thank you.  
Butler Animal Health Supply
**


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Steven M. Caesare]

I've already fat fingered it "bung" at least once.

 

Just sayin'...

 

;-)

 

-sc

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a
bit silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word
association for me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this
name and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but
I'm interested to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2



On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze 
wrote:

Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
URL.

 



From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
Guess I know which one I'm going to (keep) using. J

 

  

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
06/22/09 06:54:00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Micheal Espinola Jr]

I have to admit, I think they chose the name poorly.  Google sounded a bit
silly to begin with too, but "bing" is not a positive word association for
me.

I'd be really interested to know what research went into choosing this name
and what the results were. I'm certainly not the average user, but I'm
interested to know who is.

I wonder if this was chosen internally by Microsoft or one of their
marketing/ad agencies...

--
ME2


On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Sam Cayze  wrote:

>  Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
> URL.
>
>  --
> *From:* John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>  Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
> Guess I know which one I’m going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools]
>
>
>
> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Happy Fathers Day

[David L Herrick]

 

 

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Happy Fathers Day

 

And even then you can will get woke up in the middle of the night...
:-)

 



From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day

Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until
they are married and gone.

 

Jon

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon Harris wrote:
> I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day
specially
> the first time Dads.
>
> Jon Harris

Just a hair over two months until D-day...

Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

 

 

 

 

 



This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Names in the 
News company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no 
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for 
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[David Lum]

If I bling-vs-google the make & model of my car, one bring up a picture of *my* 
car, the other doesn't. :)   (Keep tryin', MS)

Dave

From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I 
know which one I'm going to (keep) using. :)

[cid:image001.jpg@01C9F31B.59328740][cid:image002@01c9f31b.59328740]

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2





Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09 
06:54:00





~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Happy Fathers Day

[Maglinger, Paul]

And even then you can get woke up in the middle of the night...  :-)



From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Happy Fathers Day


Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until
they are married and gone.
 
Jon


On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:


On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon Harris
wrote:
> I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers
day specially
> the first time Dads.
>
> Jon Harris


Just a hair over two months until D-day...

Kurt

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
~
~   ~



 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Micheal Espinola Jr]

Interesting.  I hadnt noticed anything like that.  To be, they appear to be
rendering at roughly the same speed, and or a slight edge to the left frame
- which is Bing.

I still prefer Google's results so far for what I have used this for.

--
ME2


On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:12 PM, John Aldrich  wrote:

>  Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
> Guess I know which one I’m going to (keep) using. J
>
>
>
> [image: John-Aldrich][image: Tile-Tools]
>
>
>
> *From:* Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)
>
>
>
> http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09
> 06:54:00
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Windows Internet Explorer 8: Get the facts [or lack thereof]

[Maglinger, Paul]

"Internet Explorer 8 is more compatible with more sites on the Internet
than any other browser."
 
Hmmm... that's interesting, seeing as it doesn't seem to support frames
anymore...
 
-Paul
 


From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:55 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows Internet Explorer 8: Get the facts [or lack thereof]


 
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/internet-explorer/get-the-facts/browser
-comparison.aspx

If the chart itself isn't hilarious enough, check out the comments on
reddit:

 
http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/8tkae/is_this_a_joke_microso
fts_version_of_browser/

My favorite comment:



That article directly contradicts Wikipedia, yet Wikipedia
actually provides citations for its claims.

 
--
ME2


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Sam Cayze]

Bing reminds me of one of those spammy landing pages for a misspelled
URL.



From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:13 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)



Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing.
Guess I know which one I'm going to (keep) using. J

 

  

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date:
06/22/09 06:54:00

 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

RE: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[John Aldrich]

Interesting. Seemed to me that Google loaded a bit faster than Bing. Guess I
know which one I'm going to (keep) using. J

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

 

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2

 

 

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.87/2195 - Release Date: 06/22/09
06:54:00


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~<><>

Bing vs. Google (a side-by-side framed web site)

[Micheal Espinola Jr]

http://www.bing-vs-google.com/?q=%22death+star%22

--
ME2

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Can't update Acrobat administrative install to 9.1.2

[Jim Dandy]

I'm trying to add an update to my administrative install for Acrobat
Pro.  I first made an administrative install for Acrobat Pro 9.0.  I
then added the update AcroProStd910_T1T2_incr.msp to it with a command
of the form

  msiexec /a \\server\share\acropro.mis /p
c:\AcroProStd910_T1T2_incr.msp

I then applied AcrobatUpd911_all_incr.msp in the same way.  After that I
tried to add AcrobatUpd912_all_incr.msp in the same way.  It appears to
start the update and then gives the following error:

Error 2602.  The File table entry 'Annots.api_911' has no associated
entry in the media table.

I could install Acro Pro from the msi that was updated with
AcrobatUpd911_all_incr.msp (prior to applying
AcrobatUpd912_all_incr.msp) and it installs.  I can then do an Adobe
update and update it to 9.1.2.  So, I assume my admin install with 9.1.1
is OK.  I just don't seem to be able to update my admin install to
9.1.2.  Any help you can provide would be appreciated.  Thanks.

Curt Finley

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Has anyone seen....

[Jay Dale]

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/dd252609.aspx


-Original Message-
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Has anyone seen

Holy cow. Google is turning up a Windows FE edition. Forensics
Environment.

http://grandstreamdreams.blogspot.com/2009/02/windows-fe-details-teased-
out-of-web.html



> -Original Message-
> From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:15 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Has anyone seen
> 
> Only "premium" that I am aware of is "small business server
> premium"
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Ognenoff [mailto:andyognen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:03 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Has anyone seen
> 
> Haven't heard of Windows 2008 Premium either...
> 
>
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/editions-overview.aspx
> 
> Could it be you're using the wrong combination of media/keys? The only
> reference to FE I've seen is "Front End" when you're talking about a
> Front End/Back End configuration.
> 
> - Andy O.
> 
> From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:45 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Has anyone seen
> 
> Sorry, technician is onsite and I got my wires crossed...
> 
> He is trying to install Windows 2008 Premium, but it is coming up
> saying
> Windows 2008 FE.
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>   ~
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Has anyone seen....

[Kennedy, Jim]

Holy cow. Google is turning up a Windows FE edition. Forensics Environment.

http://grandstreamdreams.blogspot.com/2009/02/windows-fe-details-teased-out-of-web.html



> -Original Message-
> From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:15 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Has anyone seen
> 
> Only "premium" that I am aware of is "small business server
> premium"
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Ognenoff [mailto:andyognen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:03 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Has anyone seen
> 
> Haven't heard of Windows 2008 Premium either...
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/editions-overview.aspx
> 
> Could it be you're using the wrong combination of media/keys? The only
> reference to FE I've seen is "Front End" when you're talking about a
> Front End/Back End configuration.
> 
> - Andy O.
> 
> From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:45 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Has anyone seen
> 
> Sorry, technician is onsite and I got my wires crossed...
> 
> He is trying to install Windows 2008 Premium, but it is coming up
> saying
> Windows 2008 FE.
> 
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
>   ~
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Has anyone seen....

[David Mazzaccaro]

Only "premium" that I am aware of is "small business server premium"
 

-Original Message-
From: Andy Ognenoff [mailto:andyognen...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Has anyone seen

Haven't heard of Windows 2008 Premium either...

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/editions-overview.aspx

Could it be you're using the wrong combination of media/keys? The only
reference to FE I've seen is "Front End" when you're talking about a
Front End/Back End configuration.

- Andy O. 

From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Has anyone seen

Sorry, technician is onsite and I got my wires crossed...

He is trying to install Windows 2008 Premium, but it is coming up saying
Windows 2008 FE.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Happy Fathers Day

[Jon Harris]

Sleep as much as possible after that you don't get any sleep.  Until they
are married and gone.

Jon

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kurt Buff  wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 21:47, Jon Harris wrote:
> > I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day
> specially
> > the first time Dads.
> >
> > Jon Harris
>
> Just a hair over two months until D-day...
>
> Kurt
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Has anyone seen....

[Andy Ognenoff]

Haven't heard of Windows 2008 Premium either...

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/editions-overview.aspx

Could it be you're using the wrong combination of media/keys? The only
reference to FE I've seen is "Front End" when you're talking about a Front
End/Back End configuration.

- Andy O. 

From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Has anyone seen

Sorry, technician is onsite and I got my wires crossed...

He is trying to install Windows 2008 Premium, but it is coming up saying
Windows 2008 FE.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Has anyone seen....

[Bob Fronk]

FE = Fake Edition?

Just kiddin I think that is the Windows Essentials Business Server

-
Bob Fronk
P Please print only as needed.





From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Has anyone seen

Sorry, technician is onsite and I got my wires crossed...

He is trying to install Windows 2008 Premium, but it is coming up saying 
Windows 2008 FE.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Andy Ognenoff 
mailto:andyognen...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I���ve never even heard of Windows 2003 Premium...are you talking SBS 2003?

 - Andy O.

From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Has anyone seen

To all,

Has anyone seen this version of Windows 2003 Standard FE?

What does the FE stand for? We haven't seen this before. We are trying to
install Windows 2003 Premium, but when we enter the Key, it wants the FE
Key.

Ideas?



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~






~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Has anyone seen....

[Jay Dale]

Thas short for Windows Server 2008 for Windows Essential Server Solutions.  
Basically a pared-down version of server that doe�t have the same functions 
as SBS or Standard.  It only has like 15 licenses as a limit.

 

Jay

 

From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Has anyone seen

 

Sorry, technician is onsite and I got my wires crossed...

He is trying to install Windows 2008 Premium, but it is coming up saying 
Windows 2008 FE.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Andy Ognenoff  wrote:

�ve never even heard of Windows 2003 Premium...are you talking SBS 2003?

 - Andy O.

From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Has anyone seen


To all,

Has anyone seen this version of Windows 2003 Standard FE?

What does the FE stand for? We haven't seen this before. We are trying to
install Windows 2003 Premium, but when we enter the Key, it wants the FE
Key.

Ideas?
 
 



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Windows Internet Explorer 8: Get the facts [or lack thereof]

[Micheal Espinola Jr]

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/internet-explorer/get-the-facts/browser-comparison.aspx

If the chart itself isn't hilarious enough, check out the comments on
reddit:


http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/8tkae/is_this_a_joke_microsofts_version_of_browser/

*My favorite comment:*

That article directly contradicts Wikipedia, yet Wikipedia actually provides
> citations for its claims.


--
ME2

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Has anyone seen....

[Daniel Rodriguez]

Sorry, technician is onsite and I got my wires crossed...

He is trying to install Windows 2008 Premium, but it is coming up saying
Windows 2008 FE.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Andy Ognenoff wrote:

> I’ve never even heard of Windows 2003 Premium...are you talking SBS 2003?
>
>  - Andy O.
> 
> From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:37 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Has anyone seen
>
> To all,
>
> Has anyone seen this version of Windows 2003 Standard FE?
>
> What does the FE stand for? We haven't seen this before. We are trying to
> install Windows 2003 Premium, but when we enter the Key, it wants the FE
> Key.
>
> Ideas?
>
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Has anyone seen....

[Andy Ognenoff]

I’ve never even heard of Windows 2003 Premium...are you talking SBS 2003?

 - Andy O. 

From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Has anyone seen

To all,

Has anyone seen this version of Windows 2003 Standard FE?

What does the FE stand for? We haven't seen this before. We are trying to
install Windows 2003 Premium, but when we enter the Key, it wants the FE
Key.

Ideas?
 
 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Has anyone seen....

[Daniel Rodriguez]

To all,

Has anyone seen this version of Windows 2003 Standard FE?

What does the FE stand for? We haven't seen this before. We are trying to
install Windows 2003 Premium, but when we enter the Key, it wants the FE
Key.

Ideas?

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: APC netbotz DVR options

[Davies,Matt]

We use the netbotz, although I haven't got it set up for archiving, you
could take a look at Xprotect from milestone, it works with a lot of the
IP cameras out there.

 

You can try it with one camera for free.

 

http://www.milestonesys.com/downloads/free_xprotect_license

 

we use it with axis network camera range without any problems.

 

Cheers

 

Matt

 

 

 

 

 

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: 22 June 2009 15:11
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: APC netbotz DVR options

 

Happy Monday, list.

 

Does anyone have a Netbotz 400 series (rack mount) archiving video to a
DVR?  If so, could you give me some details on the DVR.  Otherwise, if
you're doing this with another solution, I'd like to know that as well
as I'm not married to APC for this...

 

TIA, 

 

Shook

 

 

 


_
This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. 
It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is 
strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all 
copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at 
h...@generalatlantic.com . Thank You.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

APC netbotz DVR options

[Andy Shook]

Happy Monday, list.

Does anyone have a Netbotz 400 series (rack mount) archiving video to a DVR?  
If so, could you give me some details on the DVR.  Otherwise, if you're doing 
this with another solution, I'd like to know that as well as I'm not married to 
APC for this...

TIA,

Shook


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

[Rick Berry]

Relatively new title on amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-Configuration-Networking-Professionals-Library/dp/0071622691/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1245679733&sr=1-2


Richard Deal has written a ton of prior Cisco stuff.  This one is 
brand-spanking-new I think, I have no insight on quality.



From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 10:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

I got that book as well, it is decent.
Nothing beats the pdf's for command reference though, they are actually really 
good with examples, between that and the book (and some net searches) you 
should be good.
jlc

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 7:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

Shane,
I've got this Cisco Press book that covers 6 & 7 and it's a good reference 
book, as it gives to the commands for both versions side by side...

http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-ASA-PIX-Firewall-Handbook/dp/1587051583/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1245678657&sr=8-1

Shook

From: Thomas Mullins [mailto:tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

Thanks Andy,

We are running version 7 right now.

Shane



From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

What version of IOS, 6, 7 or 8?

Shook

From: Thomas Mullins [mailto:tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

I know this is a bit off topic,

But does anyone recommend a good book on the Cisco ASA's?

Thanks
Shane






















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

[Joseph L. Casale]

I got that book as well, it is decent.
Nothing beats the pdf's for command reference though, they are actually really 
good with examples, between that and the book (and some net searches) you 
should be good.
jlc

From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 7:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

Shane,
I've got this Cisco Press book that covers 6 & 7 and it's a good reference 
book, as it gives to the commands for both versions side by side...

http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-ASA-PIX-Firewall-Handbook/dp/1587051583/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1245678657&sr=8-1

Shook

From: Thomas Mullins [mailto:tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

Thanks Andy,

We are running version 7 right now.

Shane



From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

What version of IOS, 6, 7 or 8?

Shook

From: Thomas Mullins [mailto:tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

I know this is a bit off topic,

But does anyone recommend a good book on the Cisco ASA's?

Thanks
Shane


















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

[Andy Shook]

Shane,
I've got this Cisco Press book that covers 6 & 7 and it's a good reference 
book, as it gives to the commands for both versions side by side...

http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-ASA-PIX-Firewall-Handbook/dp/1587051583/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1245678657&sr=8-1

Shook

From: Thomas Mullins [mailto:tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us]
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 9:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

Thanks Andy,

We are running version 7 right now.

Shane



From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

What version of IOS, 6, 7 or 8?

Shook

From: Thomas Mullins [mailto:tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us]
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

I know this is a bit off topic,

But does anyone recommend a good book on the Cisco ASA's?

Thanks
Shane














~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

[Thomas Mullins]

Thanks Andy,

 

We are running version 7 right now.

 

Shane

 

 



From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

 

What version of IOS, 6, 7 or 8?

 

Shook

 

From: Thomas Mullins [mailto:tsmull...@wise.k12.va.us] 
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 1:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Slightly OT Cisco ASA book recommendation

 

I know this is a bit off topic,

 

But does anyone recommend a good book on the Cisco ASA's?  

 

Thanks

Shane

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Happy Fathers Day

[Christopher Bodnar]

On the topic of fatherhood. I just got this yesterday as a Father's day
present:

 

http://www.amazon.com/Home-Game-Accidental-Guide-Fatherhood/dp/039306901X/
ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8

&s=books&qid=1245674204&sr=8-1

 

 

I was unfamiliar with Mr. Lewis up until this point. Probably the funniest
book I've read in the last 10 years. 

 

 

Chris Bodnar, MCSE
Sr. Systems Engineer
Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com
Phone: 610-807-6459
Fax: 610-807-6003

  _  

From: jk.har...@gmail.com [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 12:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Happy Fathers Day

 

I know some of us have to work today but have a happy Fathers day
specially the first time Dads.

 

Jon Harris

 

 



-
This message, and any attachments to it, may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the
message and any attachments.  Thank you.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~