Re: [osol-discuss] Dell 2950 + MD 1000 + iSCSI and NFS
Thanks for your reply. > Actually NFS would be a much more elegant and simple solution, if your > clients are NFS capable, even for example for database workloads (did you > know that Oracle has a built-in NFS client/accelerator of her own?) This is for a VMware ESX cluster, so iSCSI is the primary method of connecting to it. I've used NFS with ESX clusters as well, but it's just not as fast as iSCSI, and I need fast... > Good approach. Try to configure MPxIO, so you have load balancing and > multipathing over both controllers. See http://docs.sun.com/ for details on > how to configure MPxIO. I will look into that - I'm not sure how that would help, though, if each controller port is isolated and connected to it's own set of disks... > RAID-Z. Actually, in your case, it should be RAID-Z2. As to why, read below... Thanks for the links and background - RAID-Z2 does seem like a good choice. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [appliances-discuss] Multi core support
Does is work okay if you boot off another distro? What happens if you boot SXCE or Indiana? (Or if those show the same misbehavior, what happens under modern LinUX LiveCD's?) %m ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [appliances-discuss] Multi core support
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Andre Lue wrote: > Martin thanks for the reply. I am totally lost on this. The same problem > occurs on Pentuim D. I am pretty sure my RAM based image is missing > something?? > > Please see my previous Pentium D post here. > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=86095&tstart=0 Mhh, I am currently on my primary box, which is an AMD based Laptop. I don't want to unwrap my Pentium DualCore 2.2GHz Laptop right now, so the output differs substantially from yours (I test it on my Pentium DC tonight). Here is what I get: /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus/c...@1 (cpudrv1) online /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown unix: [ID 557827 kern.info] cpu1 initialization complete - online Here a bit more: $ grep cpu /var/adm/messages* /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:14 unknown unix: [ID 126719 kern.info] features: 613f6fff /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:14 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 177709 kern.info] pcplusmp: vector 0x9 ioapic 0x2 intin 0x9 is bound to cpu 1 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:15 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 803547 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 vector 0xe ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:17 unknown genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus (cpunex0) online /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:17 unknown cpunex: [ID 114370 kern.info] cpu0 at cpus0 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:17 unknown genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus/c...@0 (cpudrv0) online /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:18 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 803547 kern.info] pcplusmp: i8042 (i8042) instance 0 vector 0x1 ioapic 0x2 intin 0x1 is bound to cpu 1 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:18 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 444295 kern.info] pcplusmp: i8042 (i8042) instance #0 vector 0xc ioapic 0x2 intin 0xc is bound to cpu 1 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:18 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 803547 kern.info] pcplusmp: pciclass,0c0320 (ehci) instance 0 vector 0x11 ioapic 0x2 intin 0x11 is bound to cpu 0 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:20 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 444295 kern.info] pcplusmp: pciclass,0c0320 (ehci) instance #1 vector 0x13 ioapic 0x2 intin 0x13 is bound to cpu 0 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:29 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 803547 kern.info] pcplusmp: pciclass,0c0310 (ohci) instance 0 vector 0x10 ioapic 0x2 intin 0x10 is bound to cpu 1 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 444295 kern.info] pcplusmp: pciclass,0c0310 (ohci) instance #2 vector 0x12 ioapic 0x2 intin 0x12 is bound to cpu 1 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: x86 (chipid 0x0 AuthenticAMD 200F31 family 17 model 3 step 1 clock 2000 MHz) /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual-Core QL-62 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu1: x86 (chipid 0x0 AuthenticAMD 200F31 family 17 model 3 step 1 clock 2000 MHz) /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu1: AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual-Core QL-62 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown cpunex: [ID 114370 kern.info] cpu1 at cpus0 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus/c...@1 (cpudrv1) online /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown unix: [ID 557827 kern.info] cpu1 initialization complete - online /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:30 unknown unix: [ID 212709 kern.info] workaround applied for cpu erratum #122 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:31 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 803547 kern.info] pcplusmp: pciexclass,060400 (pcie_pci) instance 0 vector 0x18 ioapic 0xff intin 0xff is bound to cpu 0 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:31 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 444295 kern.info] pcplusmp: pciexclass,060400 (pcie_pci) instance #2 vector 0x19 ioapic 0xff intin 0xff is bound to cpu 0 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:47 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 444295 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance #1 vector 0xf ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 0 /var/adm/messages.2:Feb 28 04:57:48 unknown pcplusmp: [ID 803547 kern.info] pcplusmp: pciclass,080501 (sdhost) instance 0 vector 0x1a ioapic 0xff intin 0xff is bound to cpu 1 bash-3.2$ psrinfo -v Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 03/16/2009 06:48:38 on-line since 02/28/2009 04:57:16. The i386 processor operates at 2000 MHz, and has an i387 compatible floating point processor. Status of virtual processor 1 as of: 03/16/2009 06:48:38 on-line since 02/28/2009 04:57:30. The i386 processor operates at 2000 MHz, and has an i387 compatible floating point processor. You should get something like it for all the 4 cores. Now we must find out why this is not the case. In theory - maybe - your CPU could contain defective core, a fact which would get recognized during (BIOS level -) POST which could lead to a situation, where all secondary cores would get flagged as being inoperable and hence no OS would try do initialize them. But this is only theory of course and it is hig
Re: [osol-discuss] liveCD login and password
Ché Kristo wrote: When it comes to usability its sometimes good to think..."what would Apple do?" I suspect Apple wouldn't let you login or do anything that doesn't have a shiny button it, so login information wouldn't even be necessary (it's a joke folks, laugh) Cheers, -- Shawn Walker ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [appliances-discuss] Multi core support
Martin thanks for the reply. I am totally lost on this. The same problem occurs on Pentuim D. I am pretty sure my RAM based image is missing something?? Please see my previous Pentium D post here. http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=86095&tstart=0 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OOo 3.1 in OpenSolaris
> For OpenSolaris users, because of a slight > incompatibility problem b/t IPS and SVR4, we need to > install libicuuc.so.3 : > > pfexec pkg install libicuuc.so.3 Oops, the correct command should be: pfexec pkg install SUNWicu libicuuc.so.3 is the library to be installed with the SUNWicu package. Apologize. :-( -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] vim doesn't source ~/.vimrc
Harry Putnam writes: > Setup: > OS=Opensolaris 2008.11 > vim=See full `:version output at the end I think parts of this thread stayed on gmane.editors.vim or at least I thought I saw a post here somewhere that asked me to post my vimrc. In case anyone is still willing to help figure this out. When I start vim something in .vimrc or a plugin is apparently turning off my syn settings. If I do `vim .bashrc' I see no syntax highlighting. Yet if I manually source ~/.vimrc then my syntax highlight appears. The last setting in .vimrc is `set ruler' and the ruler does appear so I know vimrc is being sourced on startup. All this is discussed in the thread of course but that is a short summary. Here is the vimrc file: http://www.jtan.com/~reader/exp/vimrc.html ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] About temperature and sensors
I hope this hasn't been beat to death here... googling around I'm not finding clear evidence indicating there is somekind of sensor pkg that can tell hdd and cpu temps. Maybe something along the line of lm_senors in the linux world. I carved a home made fan port in the door of my pc to blow directly over the 4 hdd that seem too crowed and seem to throw some heat to the feel. The fan is mounted exteral 120mm very quiet... Id like to see effect it has. Is there something available or some existing commands that tap into S.M.A.R.T info? Or anything at all that can tell temperatures of hdd? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] liveCD login and password
Ché Kristo writes: > Whilst it is an RTFM case I think its a reasonable request that when > distributing the liveCD to have it printed on the CD or CD case. > > When it comes to usability its sometimes good to think..."what would > Apple do?" Another way to go at is to think... what does common sense dictate. I too stumbled around on the passwrd stuff for a time. The release notes is NOT a good place for that kind of info. Although I guess they are kind of obvious... didn't seem like it at the time though. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] liveCD login and password
Whilst it is an RTFM case I think its a reasonable request that when distributing the liveCD to have it printed on the CD or CD case. When it comes to usability its sometimes good to think..."what would Apple do?" -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] AM3 support
Just found that a bug with the SATA controller on the SouthBridge SB750 chip set was fixed in build 104 so the SATA portion of the motherboard works. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] AM3 support
> (first post here, therefore please point me into the > right direction if necessary) > I find myself in the very same situation. My > intention is to buy a 790GX based motherboard to > leverage the onboard graphics (which should provide > more than enough 2D/3D power for my needs). More > specifically I am looking into buying a system having > specs similar to this list: > > - Phenom II x4 810 (or 925 when available) > - 790GX-based motherboard with ATI Radeon™ HD 3300 > onboard graphics > - 8 GB DDR3 RAM. > > Will OpenSolaris 200906 support this kind of > configuration and to what degree (on-board graphics > in particular)? > > Thanks > Georg I am not worried about the onboard graphics as a graphics card is not that expensive, Radeon is not as well supported as Nvidia chipset. My big question is if the AMD 790 Northbridge and SB750 southbridge chip sets are supported as that will determine Network/SATA/USB support. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] AM3 support
(first post here, therefore please point me into the right direction if necessary) I find myself in the very same situation. My intention is to buy a 790GX based motherboard to leverage the onboard graphics (which should provide more than enough 2D/3D power for my needs). More specifically I am looking into buying a system having specs similar to this list: - Phenom II x4 810 (or 925 when available) - 790GX-based motherboard with ATI Radeon™ HD 3300 onboard graphics - 8 GB DDR3 RAM. Will OpenSolaris 200906 support this kind of configuration and to what degree (on-board graphics in particular)? Thanks Georg -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] subscribe problem
> It seems there is some kind of BUG regarding > subscribing to forums by sending > forumname-subscr...@opensolaris.org. > > There is/was a problem at least for me with > observability-discuss and kerberos-discuss. Could you be more specific? Do you have a bounced email? Have you visited the mailman pages and tried via the subscription pages, e.g. http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/observability-discuss ? You'll need to provide a bit more information before I can help find the problem. Email with full headers and message ids are the most help. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] subscribe problem
Hi, It seems there is some kind of BUG regarding subscribing to forums by sending forumname-subscr...@opensolaris.org. There is/was a problem at least for me with observability-discuss and kerberos-discuss. Thanks -- Regards, Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072 http://estseg.blogspot.com -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] liveCD login and password
Thanks. But I would argue that you actually *DO* need it in "good" conditions. If you choose the console boot option rather than graphical, you need it. Also, if you choose the graphical option with the liveCD, you have no way of shutting down your system without the password. Shutdown from within gnome just logs you out (and then what are you supposed to do from there with no login/password). Having this on a buried errata page is bad. It should be printed on the CD case and clearly visible when you download the liveCD. Thanks again, Jeremy On Mar 14, 2009, at 16:44, Andras Barna wrote: in *good* conditions you dont need it, right? you can find it for example here: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/relnotes/200811/x86/ On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: I don't see anywhere on this site or on the case containing the 2008.11 livecd information as to what the login and password are for the liveCD. This should be bold on the CD case. How are we supposed to guess it? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org -- Andy http://blog.sartek.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SMC & smcwebserver @ OpenSolaris
SMC and smcwebserver were eoled if i recall corectly On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 1:43 PM, mike wrote: > Is there a reason these packages are only included on the DVD image, and not > through one of the dev/release repositories? > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SMC & smcwebserver @ OpenSolaris
Is there a reason these packages are only included on the DVD image, and not through one of the dev/release repositories? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Dell 2950 + MD 1000 + iSCSI and NFS
> I would like to serve primarily iSCSI from this to a > VMware cluster, and maybe some NFS, although that is > not as important. Actually NFS would be a much more elegant and simple solution, if your clients are NFS capable, even for example for database workloads (did you know that Oracle has a built-in NFS client/accelerator of her own?) > I think the best approach would be: > > Use both PERC/5E controllers. Good approach. Try to configure MPxIO, so you have load balancing and multipathing over both controllers. See http://docs.sun.com/ for details on how to configure MPxIO. > Setup both MD1000 as JBOD and not use any of the > horrible RAID capabilities Yes, this will give you the best ZFS performance. > Connect all four ports from the PERC/5E's > individually to the MD1000's > Use software RAID (is this raidz?) in Opensolaris and > create some RAID sets RAID-Z. Actually, in your case, it should be RAID-Z2. As to why, read below... > The question then becomes - how many RAID sets - > should I not span the individual ports from the PERCs > to the MD1000's - I believe that port 0 on the MD1000 > addresses drives 1-7, and port 1 addresses 8-15. Good question, and the following might help you: "When to (and not to) use RAID-Z" http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/when_to_and_not_to > Anything else that I should be aware of? Yes; As I've written above, you probably should implement RAID-Z2, which is a variation of RAID-Z, but with double parity. You will of course lose one additional drive, but at 400GB a piece, can you really risk being without protection for that long? 400GB takes a while to sync. Ideally, if you can afford it, you should configure RAID-Z2 with a hot spare, so that you can lose a total of three drives before being out of service. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Nvidia, sound through HDMI
> Just installed a Nvidia 9500GT graphics card that > supports HDMI with a s/pdif pass through for sound. > Installed latest Nvidia driver from Nvidia > NVIDIA-Solaris-x86-180.29 > > Picture through HDMI works great but I do not get any > sound. > > Is anyone working on turning the sound pass-thru on > for the Nvidia driver? > > Thanks Also has anyone experienced lockup with the newest Nvida driver? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SMC & smcwebserver @ OpenSolaris
Great - let me love you :-D I tryed this without of the "-d" have a nice Day Henri -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [appliances-discuss] Multi core support
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Andre Lue wrote: > Still only 1 cpu showing with snv_109 on intel badaxe 2 with quad core? Can > anyone offer any guidance on this. This occurs in the EON RAM based image > list above. Any help is greatly appreciated. Hi Andre, sorry, after a night of reading the first 400 pages of "Learning Shell Programming in 24 hours" I am exhausted now and power myself down in a minute, I just saw your msg. before I closed my mail session. So I don't check any detail. But in a quick guess I would say chances are it might be remotely related to what I wrote about last year: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/xwin-discuss/2008-August/002159.html ? UPDATE: NO! It looks like a pretty different issue. In your case it appears, as if the 2nd core has not been correctly initialized indeed (or as if the 2nd core has been shut down / disabled). Could it be that the CPUID of your CoreDuo2 2.4GHz chip is just too brand new, and hence not in the kernel's cpu-identification code yet? The CPU identification detection mechanism code code can be tricky, I recall that it has been a bit difficult to make qemu-system-x86_64 be recognized as AMD64-capable 64bit cpu at first (by any Solaris 10 /11 kernel), Solaris only saw it as 32 bit 686. The Linux kernel does not have so sophisticated checks and recognized it from the outset on (also due to the fact, that most qemu.org developers still use linUX as their primary devel platform). But Juergen Keil soon found a fix for Solaris, back in October 2006 (for exact details and the files involved see qemu-discuss archives). Regards, %martin > > uname -a > SunOS eon 5.11 snv_109 i86pc i386 i86pc > > grep cpu /var/adm/messages > Mar 14 22:21:52 eon unix: [ID 126719 kern.info] features: > 635f7fff > Mar 14 22:21:52 eon genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus (cpunex0) online > Mar 14 22:21:52 eon cpudrv: [ID 569748 kern.info] NOTICE: cpu_acpi: _TSS > package not found. > Mar 14 22:21:52 eon cpudrv: [ID 227567 kern.warning] WARNING: cpu_acpi: error > parsing _TSS for CPU instance 0 > Mar 14 22:21:52 eon cpudrv: [ID 888440 kern.warning] WARNING: > cpudrv_mach_pm_init: instance 0: unable to initialize T-state support > Mar 14 22:21:52 eon cpunex: [ID 114370 kern.info] cpu0 at cpus0 > Mar 14 22:21:52 eon genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus/c...@0 (cpudrv0) > online > Mar 14 22:21:53 eon unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: x86 (chipid 0x0 > GenuineIntel 6FB family 6 model 15 step 11 clock 2400 MHz) > Mar 14 22:21:53 eon unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: Intel(r) Core(tm)2 Quad > CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz > > kstat -m cpu_info > module: cpu_info instance: 0 > name: cpu_info0 class: misc > brand Intel(r) Core(tm)2 Quad CPU Q6600 > @ 2.40GHz > chip_id 0 > clock_MHz 2400 > clog_id 0 > core_id 0 > cpu_type i386 > crtime 79.075183264 > current_clock_Hz 239400 > family 6 > fpu_type i387 compatible > implementation x86 (chipid 0x0 GenuineIntel 6FB > family 6 model 15 step 11 clock 2400 MHz) > model 15 > ncore_per_chip 4 > ncpu_per_chip 4 > pkg_core_id 0 > snaptime 7322.708390132 > state on-line > state_begin 1237094512 > stepping 11 > supported_frequencies_Hz 159600:239400 > vendor_id GenuineIntel > > note ncore_per_chip looks right but psrinfo out ??? > > psrinfo -v > Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 03/15/2009 00:23:28 > on-line since 03/14/2009 22:21:52. > The i386 processor operates at 2400 MHz, > and has an i387 compatible floating point processor. > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [appliances-discuss] Multi core support
Still only 1 cpu showing with snv_109 on intel badaxe 2 with quad core? Can anyone offer any guidance on this. This occurs in the EON RAM based image list above. Any help is greatly appreciated. uname -a SunOS eon 5.11 snv_109 i86pc i386 i86pc grep cpu /var/adm/messages Mar 14 22:21:52 eon unix: [ID 126719 kern.info] features: 635f7fff Mar 14 22:21:52 eon genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus (cpunex0) online Mar 14 22:21:52 eon cpudrv: [ID 569748 kern.info] NOTICE: cpu_acpi: _TSS package not found. Mar 14 22:21:52 eon cpudrv: [ID 227567 kern.warning] WARNING: cpu_acpi: error parsing _TSS for CPU instance 0 Mar 14 22:21:52 eon cpudrv: [ID 888440 kern.warning] WARNING: cpudrv_mach_pm_init: instance 0: unable to initialize T-state support Mar 14 22:21:52 eon cpunex: [ID 114370 kern.info] cpu0 at cpus0 Mar 14 22:21:52 eon genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /cpus/c...@0 (cpudrv0) online Mar 14 22:21:53 eon unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: x86 (chipid 0x0 GenuineIntel 6FB family 6 model 15 step 11 clock 2400 MHz) Mar 14 22:21:53 eon unix: [ID 950921 kern.info] cpu0: Intel(r) Core(tm)2 Quad CPUQ6600 @ 2.40GHz kstat -m cpu_info module: cpu_infoinstance: 0 name: cpu_info0 class:misc brand Intel(r) Core(tm)2 Quad CPUQ6600 @ 2.40GHz chip_id 0 clock_MHz 2400 clog_id 0 core_id 0 cpu_typei386 crtime 79.075183264 current_clock_Hz239400 family 6 fpu_typei387 compatible implementation x86 (chipid 0x0 GenuineIntel 6FB family 6 model 15 step 11 clock 2400 MHz) model 15 ncore_per_chip 4 ncpu_per_chip 4 pkg_core_id 0 snaptime7322.708390132 state on-line state_begin 1237094512 stepping11 supported_frequencies_Hz159600:239400 vendor_id GenuineIntel note ncore_per_chip looks right but psrinfo out ??? psrinfo -v Status of virtual processor 0 as of: 03/15/2009 00:23:28 on-line since 03/14/2009 22:21:52. The i386 processor operates at 2400 MHz, and has an i387 compatible floating point processor. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
