Re: [Openstack-operators] Milan Ops Midcycle

[Mariano Cunietti]

Thank you Melvin,
great job organizing all of this!
And thanks Robert for sharing this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6RGO0zfndw
See you in Boston!

M.


NOTICE: my email address has changed from mcunie...@enter.it to 
mcunie...@enter.eu. Former address will work for some weeks before it’s been 
shut.

Sent from mobile device

> On 17 Mar 2017, at 13:20, Melvin Hillsman  wrote:
> 
> Hey everyone,
> 
> I want to send a big thank you to everyone who participated in the Midcycle!
> 
> To our sponsors we appreciate you making a venue, food, and all the other 
> logistics that went into making the event a success.
> 
> Thank you to every moderator who dealt with me nagging them about their 
> sessions and getting some actionable items out of their discussions; I have 
> one more request coming :)
> 
> Additionally thank you to all the companies who sent their folks to the 
> Midcycle:
> 
> Enter, Bloomberg, Nuage Networks, Intel, Cloudbase, Switch, and OpenStack
> 
> And to you folks who attended in person and remotely, we are very greatful 
> that we sold every ticket, ate lots of Italian food, the courtyard side 
> chats, networking, collaboration, and so much more. Be sure to communicate 
> the value you got out of attending but most importantly let us work together 
> outside of the Midcycle to accomplish what we can.
> 
> Remember OSOps meeting in #openstack-meeting-5 on 03/27/17 at 1400 UTC
> 
> --
> Melvin Hillsman
> Ops Technical Lead
> OpenStack Innovation Center
> mrhills...@gmail.com
> phone: (210) 312-1267
> mobile: (210) 413-1659
> Learner | Ideation | Belief | Responsibility | Command
> http://osic.org
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] need input on log translations

[Mariano Cunietti]

> On 11 Mar 2017, at 10:54, Saverio Proto  wrote:
> 
> I am Italian speaking.
> Does not make any sense to have the log messages translated. I think
> everything has already being said.

+1
I think there is not even an italian word for "log" 😉

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] [midcycle-ops-meetup-MIL] call for sponsors - Milano

[Mariano Cunietti]

Dear all,
as some of you may already know, Milano (Italy, Europe, Earth) has been chosen 
as the next city to host the mid-cycle Openstack Operators Meetup scheduled on 
March 15-16, 2017.

While we’re setting up everything to give you the best Italian lifestyle 
experience, we need to find the resources to make it...awesome.
Therefore we’re looking for partners and sponsors to support us while we figure 
out how to make your stay here amazing.

We’re going to host 120-130 people here: http://www.coworkinglogin.it/ 
. A night event is under definition on the 
evening of March 15.
More details at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-meetup 


If you’re interested, please join us on IRC every Tuesday at 3PM UTC with the 
Ops Meetup Team (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team 
) or drop me an email at 
mcunie...@enter.eu.

Ciao!

M.


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] operators meetups team meetings

[Mariano Cunietti]

sorry guys, can’t find the right room, openstack-meeting-3 is empty, and 
eavesdrop doesn’t help at all
any hint


NOTICE: my email address has changed from mcunie...@enter.it to 
mcunie...@enter.eu. Former address will work for some weeks before it’s been 
shut.


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

> On 13 Dec 2016, at 15:13, Matt Van Winkle  wrote:
> 
> Traveling today to meetings at one of our DC's, but I am fine if we ant to 
> move to 15:00.  Just let me know if the new time sticks.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:52 AM, Chris Morgan  > wrote:
> 
>> Yes almost all responses were in favor and shintaro can (just about) manage 
>> it. We can discuss whether that's the new standard time during today's 
>> meeting 
>> 
>> Chris 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:11 AM, Matt Jarvis > > wrote:
>> 
>>> Are we definitely moving this meeting to 1500 today ? 
>>> 
>>> Matt
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Chris Morgan >> > wrote:
>>> Please note: all responses regarding timing of weekly openstack operators 
>>> meetups team IRC meetings are in favor (or at least not against) moving the 
>>> meeting to 15:00 UTC. Unless more responses are received changing this, I 
>>> propose we move next weeks meeting to Tuesday 15:00 UTC.
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Shintaro Mizuno 
>>> mailto:mizuno.shint...@lab.ntt.co.jp>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 1500UTC (2400JST) would work, but no later please :)
>>> 
>>> Shintaro
>>> 
>>> On 2016/12/07 0:07, Chris Morgan wrote:
>>> Today's meeting was held at 14:00 UTC, minutes here
>>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetups_team/ 
>>> 
>>> 2016/ops_meetups_team.2016-12-06-14 .25.html
>>> 
>>> Actually though the meeting started late and was thinly attended. I would
>>> like to ask attendees and prospective attendees whether moving this regular
>>> meeting might help attendance. There are several in favor of pushing it to
>>> 15:00 UTC, although this places some degree of hardship on at least one
>>> other attendee.
>>> 
>>> Barring major developments, the next meeting will proceed the same, 14:00
>>> UTC next Tuesday, December 13th.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org 
>>> 
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Shintaro MIZUNO (水野伸太郎)
>>> NTT Software Innovation Center
>>> TEL: 0422-59-4977
>>> E-mail: mizuno.shint...@lab.ntt.co.jp 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org 
>>> 
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Chris Morgan mailto:mihali...@gmail.com>>
>>> 
>> ___
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org 
>> 
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Questo messaggio e' stato analizzato con Libra ESVA ed e' risultato non 
> infetto. 
> Clicca qui per segnalarlo come spam. 
>  
> Clicca qui per metterlo in blacklist 
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__

Re: [Openstack-operators] VPNaaS and FWaaS

[Mariano Cunietti]

Hi Kyle,

> I know there are operators relying on these functions, particularly in the
> public cloud space in Europe, so this would impact those people. I also know
> this list doesn't necessarily reach all of them either, so I will try and
> reach out by other means as well, but it would be very useful to try and get
> a clearer picture of how many people are using VPNaaS and FWaaS. If you are,
> could you please respond to this thread ?

We are using VPNaaS and FWaaS on entercloudsuite.com, on Juno.
With VPNaaS it basically works (or: works basically) but there are some issues 
with the configuration of MTU and some other server side configurations that 
drop some client connections. I can can provide more details if you want on a 
private thread.
With FWaaS we are providing it but we also deprecate it; moreover, it’s 
generating a lot of confusion and overlap with Security Groups


>
I'm actually really surprised that people are *using* FWaaS. It's been
marked experimental for over 3 years now, and it only recently in
Liberty received work which made it somewhat useful, which was the
ability to apply a firewall on a specific Neutron router rather than
all tenant routers. FWaaS in production sounds pretty risky to me, but
I supposed that our fault for not being clear on it's readiness.

Agree, but the words EXPERIMENTAL and NOT PRODUCTION READY are pretty visible 
in the documentation.
So, not your fault at all


> If we have metrics that a constituent part of the user community need these
> functions, then we can try and find a way to help the Neutron team to cover
> the resourcing gaps.
>
If people are using these, IMHO that's another reason to keep them
around. I've already said that we have at least one large user of VPN,
so that project will continue to be worked on even if it's removed
from Neutron.

Here’s what WE’D LOVE to have:

  *   VPNaaS
  *   IDS or some TAPaaS to redirect router traffic to a tenant’s instance 
(remember we all sell instances)
  *   IPS, that is the ability not only to eavesdrop but also to drop traffic 
using Snort or better Suricata + ELK 
(https://github.com/StamusNetworks/SELKS/blob/master/README.rst)
  *   FWaaS meant as multiple firewall “flavors”. Lots of customers ask for 
PFSense or their own Linux/FreeBSD solution
  *   Network analytics in general (with InfluxDB or Monasca)

Thanks

Mariano


___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] vmware to openstack

[Mariano Cunietti]

From: suresh kumar mailto:boilingb...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday 6 May 2016 at 17:07
To: 
"openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
 
mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] vmware to openstack

I am working on a project to migrate vm's from vmware to openstack where am 
using tools to convert disk and later upload them to glance and spin instances 
are there any tools/scripts where I can migrate multiple vm's at a time.

https://cloudbase.it/cloud-migration-as-a-service/
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for MAN Ops Meetup (Feb 15, 16)

[Mariano Cunietti]

Hi Tom

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

On 04 Feb 2016, at 12:28, Tom Fifield 
mailto:t...@openstack.org>> wrote:

We still need moderators for the following:


* Keystone Federation - discussion session

I can help moderating this session


* OSOps - what is it, where is it going, what you can do

Also on this one

Ciao

M.

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] European Operators

[Mariano Cunietti]

Ciao Matt, nice to meet you again!
Italians with ECS, www.entercloudsuite.com 
onboard!

FYI, together with Numergy (Alexandre Steiner is CC’ed here), KPN, Gigas, 
Belgacom/Proximus, Portugal Telecom we are participating in the CTA, Cloud Team 
Alliance, and we are already setting up 
meetings with the main Openstack (and not) players in Europe.
The goal is not only to set up a technology-driven group, but to create an 
ecosystem to work with and to carve out a real european offer. Which may be: 
not centralized, but distributed and respectful of #diversity (and hopefully as 
less bureaucratic as possible…). We think this could be a very interesting 
approach and very peculiar, compared to the "big guys”. We could end up with 
something that is a real singularity in the cloud scene.
Needless to say, Openstack would play a great role in building this kind of 
infrastructure.  Obviously, federation is something we need to address also on 
a technology and/or architecture standpoint.

I suggest join the efforts and set a date for a first meeting al together, and 
know each other. How about it? BTW, Tokyo may be an option: I am going.
The sooner we book agendas and flights, the better.

Ciao

Mariano


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

On 18 Sep 2015, at 14:24, Salman Toor 
mailto:salman.t...@it.uu.se>> wrote:

Hi everyone,

From the platform of SNIC (Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing), we 
are in the process of building a national level Cloud facility for research and 
academic activities in Sweden.

I can contribute our experiences and requirements from SNIC side.

Regards..
Salman.

PhD, Scientific Computing
Researcher, IT Department,
Uppsala University.
Senior Cloud Architect,
SNIC.
Cloud Application Expert,
UPPMAX.
Visiting Researcher,
Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP).
salman.t...@it.uu.se
http://www.it.uu.se/katalog/salto690

On 18 Sep 2015, at 11:56, Adam Huffman 
mailto:adam.huff...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I would be very keen to attend an Operators' meeting in Europe,
probably along with a lot of other UK academic cloud people.

Cheers,
Adam

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Matt Van Winkle 
mailto:mvanw...@rackspace.com>> wrote:
We have some Operations folks in London.  Depending on the timing of this, I
might be able to get some of them there as well.  With the next full summit
being in North America, it makes a lot of sense to place the next Ops meet
up in a different global location.  There has been discussion of this before
to increase the chances of Operators being able to attend some portion of
the events throughout the year by distributing their locations.

Thanks!
VW

From: Tim Bell mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch>>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 11:05 AM
To: Matt Jarvis 
mailto:matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk>>, Neil 
Jerram
mailto:neil.jer...@metaswitch.com>>
Cc: 
"openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>>

Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] European Operators

We could probably find one or more of the CERN operations team to come along
too from the 3 OpenStack clouds we’ve got here.



Tim



From: Matt Jarvis [mailto:matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk]
Sent: 17 September 2015 15:09
To: Neil Jerram mailto:neil.jer...@metaswitch.com>>
Cc: 
openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] European Operators



Don't see why not. Let's see what the overall interest is first :)



On 17 September 2015 at 13:41, Neil Jerram 
mailto:neil.jer...@metaswitch.com>>
wrote:

Are Europe-based developers/vendors welcome too?  My project (Calico) is
always keen to understand more about operator interests and requirements, so
I'd be very happy to be there.

   Neil




On 17/09/15 13:17, Matt Jarvis wrote:

I'm thinking we'll let this thread run for a day or so and hopefully gather
a few more interested parties, then take the conversation off-list and see
what the consensus is from those who've expressed an interest about how we
might move this forward ?



On 17 September 2015 at 13:04, Tom Fifield 
mailt