Re: [Owfs-developers] Firmware being used on the wireless routers
On Dec 2, 2007 7:16 AM, Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In general the G is backward-compatible with B. > > Paul Alfille > > > > On Dec 1, 2007 12:52 AM, Gregg C Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Hello! > > Indeed. > > I looked at the list of gear, and naturally the one I want to use isn't on > > the list. Although all of their later models are on it. This tells me that > > Wireless-B isn't on that group's things-to-do list. > > Hello! Indeed. And according to the bright guys at Fluke Networks, it certainly is backward compatible as you've stated. Now if it actually comes down to this, I'll probably order RSN from Amazon a LinkSYS Wireless-G router, the kind that I know all of you are using, and do the things that are supposed to be done to enable both OWFS support, and even seeing how custom firmware is running on it. But I was indeed actually looking forward to having one of the earlier models roosting here. I suppose my next step is to rouse the gang at Seattle Wireless and ask them about this.. -- Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This signature was once found posting rude messages in English in the Moscow subway." - SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 ___ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
Re: [Owfs-developers] DS2480 "Cannot detect DS2480 or LINK interface" in 2.7
> Well the first thing that stands out is the device name, ttyr00. Is that > correct? Yes, that's on a moxa serial port server. Very weird software, but it somehow works (most times). As I said, with 2.6p8 no problem, and 2.7p0 works on a different machine (sarge running 2.6.8) but not on etch running 2.6.18). I also tried a etch/2.6.22 machine, same error. On my laptop with a physical rs232 connection (running etch w/2.6.2x) same thing (2.7p0 fails, 2.6p8 works). Michael - SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 ___ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
Re: [Owfs-developers] DS2480 "Cannot detect DS2480 or LINK interface" in 2.7
Well the first thing that stands out is the device name, ttyr00. Is that correct? Paul Alfille On Dec 1, 2007 10:17 AM, Michael Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > DEFAULT: Cannot detect DS9097 (passive) interface on /dev/ttyr00. > Paul Alfille - SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4___ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
Re: [Owfs-developers] Firmware being used on the wireless routers
In general the G is backward-compatible with B. Paul Alfille On Dec 1, 2007 12:52 AM, Gregg C Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > Indeed. > I looked at the list of gear, and naturally the one I want to use isn't on > the list. Although all of their later models are on it. This tells me that > Wireless-B isn't on that group's things-to-do list. > - SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4___ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
