On Wed, 06/24 18:14, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 09.06.2015 04:13, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >In block/backup.c, we already check and add blocker on the target bs,
> >which is necessary so that it won't be intervened with other operations.
> >
> >In block/mirror.c we should also protect the mirror target bs, because it
> >could have a node-name (drive-mirror ... node-name=XXX), and on top of
> >that it's safe to add blockdev-mirror.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> >---
> > block/mirror.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
> >index 33c640f..8b23ddd 100644
> >--- a/block/mirror.c
> >+++ b/block/mirror.c
> >@@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ static void mirror_exit(BlockJob *job, void *opaque)
> > aio_context_release(replace_aio_context);
> > }
> > g_free(s->replaces);
> >+bdrv_op_unblock_all(s->target, s->common.blocker);
> > bdrv_unref(s->target);
> > block_job_completed(&s->common, data->ret);
> > g_free(data);
> >@@ -682,6 +683,7 @@ static void mirror_start_job(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >BlockDriverState *target,
> > return;
> > }
> >+bdrv_op_block_all(target, s->common.blocker);
> > s->replaces = g_strdup(replaces);
> > s->on_source_error = on_source_error;
> > s->on_target_error = on_target_error;
>
> Do we need a bdrv_op_unblock_all() if bdrv_create_dirty_bitmap() fails?
>
Yes, good catch!
Fam
