Hi,
altough R2 could have been a candidate, not sure it would have been such a
good solution as-is. speed, and portability issues have been a thorn in
many attempts by Carl and others to migrate REBOL into other targets and
specialized uses.
R3 is built from the ground up to be portable and much easier to adapt to
different HW/OS needs. Its one of the few core reasons R3 had to be done.
like any new technology, it has had to mature and finally, I think, with R3,
REBOL will be able to evolve on its own wings, not just where/when Carl has
time to bolt them on.
people say R3 has been long in comming, yep. that's life. but new
opportunities are always around the corner. Its Possible that REBOL will be
ready when the next round of updates for this and other technologies will be
called for.
my 0.02 cents
-MAx
On Feb 12, 2008 4:34 PM, david may <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Gregg,
>
> Sunday, February 10, 2008, 6:02:34 AM, you wrote:
>
> dm>> its a shame and assume its now to late, but it would have been cool
> dm>> if carl could have submitted rebol for inclusion to the DVB call
> dm>> for for technologies...
>
> > I doubt Carl has many free moments right now.
>
> > -- Gregg
>
> true, its a shame the team couldn't find some time to try,its just one
> more missed chance
> to progress and in a very big way.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
> lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
