User Management (Lazy Configuration)

2002-10-02 Thread Calbazana, Al

I have one RH box set up with a set of users/groups.  I'd like to copy
users/group definitions to another machine.  Could it be as simple as moving
the passwd and groups file?

Al


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: veritas 8.5

2002-09-27 Thread Calbazana, Al

Roger,

This is a timely thread!  We just go finished going through the same process
about an hour ago!

Check out:
 
http://seer.support.veritas.com/search_forms/SearchFrame.asp?SearchTerm=unix
%20agent%20install&Path=seer%2esupport%2everitas%2ecom%2fdocs%2f241989%2ehtm

We have a mixed environment here (WIN2k/RH) and have been running Samba with
no issues.  But as far as backups go... I'd rather put a *nix agent on my RH
machines and let Backupexec do the rest.

Thanks,

Al
-Original Message-
From: Roger Schmeits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: veritas 8.5

We are in the process of buying a new file server. Will be storing about
100G of data for our window users. Are considering using RH7.x running
Samba and are curious of everyones success rate of incorporating a Samba
machine into a NT domain.

Please note that are backup machine is a Win2k box running Veritas 8.5
and trying to figure out how am I going to backup all these shares on a
Linux machine?  8.5 does have a program a person installs on the file
server which allows to be backuped from Veritas.

Has anybody been backing up a Linux box using Veritas 8.5 what is your
success rate?  Doesn't it get weird backing up files from linux to
Windows?

I often restore files on a regular base so I am very concerned about
that function.



-- 
**
Roger Schmeits
System Analyst
Clarkson College
http://www.clarksoncollege.edu
Omaha, NE USA
1-800-647-5500 x22542
* 



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



VSS and Samba Shares

2002-09-20 Thread Calbazana, Al
Title: VSS and Samba Shares





Hello,

I would like to know if anyone is able to help with setting up a Samba share to run under VSS.  Currently, I have a share set up that contains files under VSS.  I have my Samba share all set and working and I am able to check files in and out of VSS.  I am having one problem where checkins to VSS result in files being left writable by the user on the Linux side.  Is there any way to get around this?  My Share config snippet follows:

[my_share]

    comment = my_share

    path = /var/my_share

    browseable = yes

    writable = yes

    valid users = @content @dev

    create mode = 0770

    directory mask = 0770

    directory mode = 0775

    force directory mode = 0770

    create mask = 0770

    force create mode = 0660

    public = no

    guest ok = no

    read only = no

Thanks,

Al



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**




Checking XFree version

2002-09-18 Thread Calbazana, Al
Title: Checking XFree version





Any way to check the version of XFree86 other than checking rpm -qa | grep XFree86?

Thanks,

Al



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**




ext2 and ext3 FS

2002-09-17 Thread Calbazana, Al

I was wondering if there are any problems with having both ext2 and ext3
filesystems running on the same machine.  I recently repartitioned a server
under RAID 5 to make extra space on a /usr paritition.  All went well and is
working properly as far as I can tell.  The partition was previously a ext3
but is now ext2 (since parted did not handle the creation of ext3).  I
suppose I could go ahead and create an ext3 outside of parted if there are
any problems with this config.

Also... After printing the partition table, I noticed that there is a Win95
Ext'd (LBA) parition?  Not exactly sure what this is!  When installing RH,
all disks were clean.  Could this be the array hardware?

 Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/ida/c0d0p1   * 1 6 24464   83  Linux
/dev/ida/c0d0p2 7   759   3072240   83  Linux
/dev/ida/c0d0p3   760  1512   3072240   83  Linux
/dev/ida/c0d0p4  1513  6530  20473440f  Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/ida/c0d0p5  1513  2265   3072224   83  Linux
/dev/ida/c0d0p6  2266  2516   1024064   82  Linux swap
/dev/ida/c0d0p7  2517  2767   1024064   83  Linux
/dev/ida/c0d0p8  2768  6530  15353024   83  Linux


Thanks,

Al


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: Newbie Question

2002-09-05 Thread Calbazana, Al
Title: Newbie Question









Did you configure the http port for 80 and
not 8080 (default)?

 

Al

 

-Original Message-
From: Slade Hornick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002
2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Newbie Question

 

I just installed Redhat 7.2
and started up Apache.  I can telnet into port 80 from the same machine,
so I know Apache is running but I can't browse even the startup page from
another machine on the network.  I can ping the server so I know it has an
IP address, I can't even telnet into port 80.

What do I look for?  Is
there a firewall setup by default that doesn't allow traffic into the server?


Thanks 
Slade


 

CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: This
electronic transmission and any documents or other writings accompanying it are
intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received
this communication in error, do not read it. Please reply to the sender at the
sender's e-mail address that you have received the message in error. Then
delete it. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action
concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments(s) by anyone
other than the named recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. 





**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**






RE: Account Management

2002-09-05 Thread Calbazana, Al









Let me ask this then...  There are not
many users, maybe it would be easier to just replicate the permissions across
servers (copy passwd and group)?

 

Thanks,

 

Al

 

-Original Message-
From: Skuse, Phil
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002
9:26 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Account Management

 



Read up on NIS (for
centralised user accounts) and NFS (for centralised home directories). There
are other options, LDAP etc., but whatever you do, keep it simple for the sake
of your own sanity.





 



-Original
Message-----
From: Calbazana, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2002 13:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Account Management

Ok... We have a few Redhat boxes set
up for development and testing...  Life is good!  I am wondering if there is an
easier way to manage user accounts.  Is there a way to centralize user
management to have accounts/permissions propagate through the network rather
that having network admins set up accounts explicitly each time a machine is
created?  Just looking for a better way J

 

Thanks,

 

Alejandro



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email
in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email
message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer
viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**





**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**






Account Management

2002-09-05 Thread Calbazana, Al








Ok... We have a few Redhat
boxes set up for development and testing... 
Life is good!  I am wondering if
there is an easier way to manage user accounts. 
Is there a way to centralize user management to have accounts/permissions
propagate through the network rather that having network admins
set up accounts explicitly each time a machine is created?  Just looking for a better way J

 

Thanks,

 

Alejandro





**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**






Disk Space

2002-08-28 Thread Calbazana, Al
Title: Disk Space





I haven't had to deal with this in a while...  AND I've never dealt with this in a server environment...

I noticed that my /usr partition is running low on space (73% full) on a small dev server.  What options do I have if I want to move space from one partition (say /var) to /usr?  The drives are in RAID 5 configuration.

Thanks,

Al



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**




Samba Refresh

2002-08-20 Thread Calbazana, Al
Title: Samba Refresh





Is there a refresh setting I can set on my Samba server?  Browsing with explorer seems a bit lagged, especially in cases of deleted folders.  I did not notice anything while paging through the .conf file.

Thanks,

Al



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**




RE: newbie question: how to speed up linux

2002-08-11 Thread Calbazana, Al

I'm just going from my limited experience...  I've had RH on a PII-200 w/
128MB and w/ 256MB, a PII-233 w/ 256 MB RAM, and an AMD K something or other
300.  Running an X environment on any of the above was not much fun.  Given
those setups, I found it less of a hassle to run in the shell.  I spent far
more time being productive than "waiting" for X apps to respond.  KDE and
Gnome would "run" but they didn't respond well.  This all could've been my
setup at the time, who knows...  I do know that any windowing environment is
going to be resource intensive.

I now run on a PIII-450 with 512 MB RAM, a Voodoo 3D, a 30GB Maxtor 7200,
and a 4GB Quantum Bigfoot.  No complaints here!  

I'm surprised Win2k seemed to perform better given that same setup :)
Win95, I can understand since it does not have as much of the overhead.

Thanks,

Al

-Original Message-
From: Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 11:37 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: newbie question: how to speed up linux

The problem with this answer is that the guy has 192MB of RAM, and 2 hard 
drives.  I can't vouch for his disk space availability, but 192MB should 
still be plenty of RAM in which to run KDE.

On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Calbazana, Al wrote:

> I assume you are booting straight to some X environment (KDE, Gnome, and
> Enlightenment).  IMO, using a GUI with such low resources is asking for
it.
> If you are going to use a machine like that, consider booting straight to
> command line :)  Besides, that's the best way to learn!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alejandro
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Anders Thoresson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 8:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: newbie question: how to speed up linux
> 
> I've just taken my first stumbling steps down on the Linux road,
> installing Redhat 7.3. Many things have impressed me so far, but the
> over all speed of my system is a big dissappointment. Compared to when I
> run Windows 95 and Windows 2000 on the same computer, almost everything
> seems to take for ever.
> 
>  Clicking "New Message" in Evolution until the new message turns up
> takes a couple of seconds. Starting OpenOffice 1.0 Writer somewhere
> between 30 seconds and a minute. Recieving 500 mails or so from my ISP
> somewhere between 15 och 30 minutes.
> 
>  My computer is a PII-233, ATI Mach64 3D Rage IIC for video, 192 MB RAM
> and 2 ATA33 hard drives.
> 
>  What's the bottleneck? Could anything besides plugging in more RAM be
> done to boost the performance?
> 
>  Best regards,
> 
>   Anders
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: newbie question: how to speed up linux

2002-08-11 Thread Calbazana, Al

I assume you are booting straight to some X environment (KDE, Gnome, and
Enlightenment).  IMO, using a GUI with such low resources is asking for it.
If you are going to use a machine like that, consider booting straight to
command line :)  Besides, that's the best way to learn!

Thanks,

Alejandro

-Original Message-
From: Anders Thoresson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: newbie question: how to speed up linux

I've just taken my first stumbling steps down on the Linux road,
installing Redhat 7.3. Many things have impressed me so far, but the
over all speed of my system is a big dissappointment. Compared to when I
run Windows 95 and Windows 2000 on the same computer, almost everything
seems to take for ever.

 Clicking "New Message" in Evolution until the new message turns up
takes a couple of seconds. Starting OpenOffice 1.0 Writer somewhere
between 30 seconds and a minute. Recieving 500 mails or so from my ISP
somewhere between 15 och 30 minutes.

 My computer is a PII-233, ATI Mach64 3D Rage IIC for video, 192 MB RAM
and 2 ATA33 hard drives.

 What's the bottleneck? Could anything besides plugging in more RAM be
done to boost the performance?

 Best regards,

  Anders



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Swap Partition

2002-08-09 Thread Calbazana, Al
Title: Swap Partition





When doing a df -h, I noticed that swap does not show up?  Any way I can get this to show?

Al



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**




Smb and SQL Server?

2002-07-23 Thread Calbazana, Al








Hello,

 

Has anyone noticed this
error when running SQL Server in a Win2k environment where a Samba service is also
running?  This error was reported intermittently and I am not sure if it is
related to smb running.

 

Event Type: Error

Event Source:  TermDD

Event Category:   None

Event ID: 50

Date:  6/14/2002

Time:  9:04:57 PM

User:  N/A

Computer:   SQL02

Description:

The RDP protocol
component X.224 detected an error in the protocol stream and has disconnected
the client. 

 

Thanks,

 

Alejandro





**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**






RE: Telnet

2002-07-07 Thread Calbazana, Al

How can I configure this under SSH?  I'd like to disallow root logins for
obvious, ok... paranoid, reasons.  

Thanks,

Alejandro

-Original Message-
From: Dave Ihnat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Telnet

On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 08:50:44AM +0200, Thomas Bergstam wrote:
> ...but you can logg in as ROOT with SSH  :-)

Not if you don't allow it.  It's configurable.
-- 
Dave Ihnat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



VIM and SSH (Putty)

2002-07-05 Thread Calbazana, Al








Silly question, but it's an annoyance...  Has
anyone successfully gotten VIM key mappings and colorschemes to work properly
under Putty (or any Windows SSH client for that matter)?  Some key mapping (pg
up, pg down, delete, and others) are not working as they should and colorschemes
are way off.  Not sure if there is a TERM setting I should be using...

 

Thanks,

 

Alejandro  





**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**






RE: Linux and Windows

2002-06-12 Thread Calbazana, Al

Thank You!  This is exactly what I will need in order to rebuild a good host
file!  I am still interested in other ways to do this w/o the need to
rebuild a host file though.

Thanks Again!

Alejandro

-Original Message-
From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux and Windows



**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11-Jun-2002/18:59 -0700, David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Calbazana, Al wrote:
>
>>I currently have Samba setup and things seem to be working fine.  Samba
>>addresses my need to move between environments, however, I want to be able
>>to refer to my windows machines by hostname rather than IP.  
>
>I presume you mean DNS hostname, rather than NetBIOS, in which case 
>/etc/hosts or a content DNS server are the options that come to mind ... 
>absent a way to make nsswitch.conf aware of WINS, which would be ideal 
>for you, but I don't know any way to do that.  
>
>On the other hand, it wouldn't be too much trouble to write a script 
>that uses WINS queries (man nmblookup) to populate /etc/hosts for you.  
>Just a thought.

Samba ships with findsmb, which a perl script scans a subnet for SMB servers
and
outputs some basic info about each one it finds.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05 HomePage: <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/>
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation <http://www.linux.org/>

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x6C94239D

iD8DBQE9ByFjpCpg3WyUI50RArB0AJ9AGIAwJRLgB3AlGR5Gux9wL+MIqwCgr6zi
YdDMgUy+mlo4IOHsWntDdf8=
=q9L1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



RE: Linux and Windows

2002-06-11 Thread Calbazana, Al

Sorry... I forgot to add that WINS is in use to resolve names in the Windows
environment.

Alejandro

-Original Message-
From: Mike Burger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Linux and Windows

You could set up DNS for your local network, and enter the machine names 
there.  That way, every machine on the network can address every other 
machine.

On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Calbazana, Al wrote:

> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> I currently have Samba setup and things seem to be working fine.  Samba
> addresses my need to move between environments, however, I want to be able
> to refer to my windows machines by hostname rather than IP.  For instance,
I
> want to FTP to a server in the windows environment.  Is there any way to
do
> this w/o having to put each entry in my hosts file?  I would guess that
nmbd
> is a possibility, but not sure.  Any help appreciated.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Alejandro
> 
> 
> 
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
> 
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> 
> www.mimesweeper.com
> **
> 
> 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Linux and Windows

2002-06-11 Thread Calbazana, Al








Hello,

 

I currently have Samba setup and things seem to be working
fine.  Samba addresses my need to move between environments, however, I
want to be able to refer to my windows machines by hostname rather than
IP.  For instance, I want to FTP to a server in the windows
environment.  Is there any way to do this w/o having to put each entry in
my hosts file?  I would guess that nmbd is a possibility, but not sure. 
Any help appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Alejandro





**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**






Web Server Configuration

2002-06-07 Thread Calbazana, Al








Does anyone have a general guideline for partitioning out a
server for use as a web server?  I'd like to get some input.  I
expect this machine to server as a dev server for a few people as well as host
Apache, Perl etc...  I am debating on whether or not to host a version
control system on this machine directly or move it off to a different
location.  Any suggestions/resources are appreciated.

 

Also, any RAID suggestions would also be welcomed J

 

The box is a Compaq DL380, 4 x 9 gig drives, 2.5 gig RAM.

 

Thanks,

 

Alejandro

 





**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**






XWindows Clients for Win32

2001-12-20 Thread Calbazana, Al

Hello,

I was wondering if anyone knows of a good, and free of course, XWindows
client for Win32.  I have run across a few, namely VNC and a few trial
products.  I was wondering if anyone had opinions any free products out
there?  Mainly, I am interested in command line apps (so I think VNC might
be fine for me...).  SSHing into my Redhat box kinda screws up VIM sessions,
some text displays, etc..  

Thanks,

Alejandro


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list