Re: [Repeater-Builder] Spectrum Communications SCR 77 UHF repeater

2007-08-24 Thread Russ Wilson
Hi Tim,
Looking at our S-7R manual about the optional CWID, it is factory programmed.
We use the id from our controller as the id source.
Russ AE6UX

wd4chs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  I am in need 
of or someone who knows anything about the CWID for a 
 Spectrum SCR-77 UHF repeater. The CWID it has now functions good only 
 it is not my call. From what I have read about this CWIDer you have to 
 have the manufacturer "burn" a chip for you that plugs into the board. 
 Is there any other way?
 
 Thanks,
 Tim WD4CHS
 
 
 
   


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Info on IFR1500

2007-03-08 Thread Russ Wilson
Hi
Some of the 1500's had a GPIB bus connector on the back which looks like a 
parallel port-DB25.  If you have that model, then all you need is a GPIB 
controller and some (major) programming and voila, you can have the output from 
your IFR.  If yours doesn't have the GPIB then there is no provisions for any 
kind of output.
Russ AE6UX

Jed Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Hey guys,
 Any way of hooking up the IFR1500 to a computer to email data from certain
 tests?
 In other words, can I hook it up to a computer so it can import the data to
 be emailed for someone to take a look at?
 
 Thanks,
 Jed
 
 
 
   


Re: [Repeater-Builder] pc-board design program wanted

2007-02-19 Thread Russ Wilson
Hi
I use DipTrace quite a lot.  It is a relatively new program, includes 
schematic, pcb, components libraries with custom capabilities, autorouting.
It comes as a free 30 day trial, a light version and the full version is about 
$500 or so, 1/10th of the big guys.  Free to check it out.
Made many boards with complicated networks and very small footprints and am 
quite satisfied.
Also the customer service is outstanding.  The author responds within hours 
usually to quesitons by the user.  Since is it new (1-2 years old), there are 
many requests for features which are responded to whether positively or 
negatively.
I am very happy with the product.  I own the full version.
Russ

Keith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  can any one 
recommend a good pc-board design program easy to use and 
 free or cheap to buy ?
 
 thanks
 
 Keith VA3KMC
 
 
   


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Best Controllers

2006-02-10 Thread Russ Wilson
Hi,all
Pac Res is still there and makes several, some
ham-bound.  We have 3 of the RI-300 series on CARA and
they work acceptable.  However, programming is very
difficult and there is no real-time clock so whenever
there is a power bump, the controller sends a "time
not set" message with every id.
In the programming, the code doesn't wrap around but
merely steps onto the next line replacing whatever was
there.  A trap which is not difficult to avoid if you
know it.  Either put several calls to another address
or plan ahead and leave some blank lines between each
command set.  Learned the hard way.
My two cents worth
Thanks
Russ AE6UX

--- "Jim B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Bob Dengler wrote:
> > At 2/10/2006 12:55 PM, you wrote:
> > 
> >>J Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>What are the best controllers out there ?? That
> will support 4 ports or
> >>>more. Able to down-load the information and
> up-load new programs. Due
> >>>audio processing.  Support multiple PL tones and
> DCS.  Top of the line
> >>>Price is not a factor. Whats out there ?? Thanks
> K9JAC
> >>
> >>You're kidding right? I don't know of anything
> that fits that bill.
> >>There are several 3 port controllers out there,
> only one 4 or more right
> >>now (Link Comm RLC-3)
> > 
> > 
> > LinkComm also has the RLC-Club with Deluxe 2
> expansion board, yielding 6 ports.
> 
> Well, I didn't really think of that right
> off...didn't know they were 
> still offering the expansion board. OK...
> 
> > 
> >>, although both S-Com and Arcom will have
> multiport
> >>controllers out this year.
> > 
> > 
> > S-Com's will only be 3 ports, though they expect a
> followup model with more 
> > ports later.  Hopefully the Arcom multiport will
> be better quality than the 
> > RC-210, which I personally don't care for.
> 
> Actually, that's how I feel about the Link, but
> again, just personal 
> opinion.
> 
> >> And they are the only ones that also will do
> >>CTCSS encode/decode internally. Right now, the
> only way to get
> >>multi-CTCSS/DCS is to buy a tone panel made for
> commercial service, and
> >>they are all single port devices. The Comm-Spec
> TP-3200 is probably the
> >>best of those over all.
> > 
> > 
> > The Pacific Research RI-300e has internal
> CTCSS/DCS decoding.  It's only a 
> > single port controller, but it can be
> daisy-chained up to 8 units.  An 
> > expensive solution, but it will do what you want
> if $$$ is no object.
> > 
> > Bob NO6B
> 
> Likewise, I thought Pac-Res was out of business, or
> at least not making 
> controllers anymore. OK-I would say that would be
> his only option at 
> this point. Or one of the Link Comm units with a
> TP-3200 on each port!
> =c$
> 
> Tnx, Bob!
> -- 
> Jim Barbour
> WD8CHL
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Mountain Lion time!

2006-01-31 Thread Russ Wilson
For the cattle feed, you forgot to mention the paper
grindings, plastic scrap(pulverized) and some metals
which would go thru the grinders.  My cousin lives
near a feed processor and is amazed what is thrown
into the cattle fodder..
All (also) USDA approved
Russ


--- Kris Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Wayne Cornick wrote:
> > Unless you have a local source of beef that is
> grown and processed 
> > locally, your beef would probably come from a
> large feed lot where the 
> > animals rarely if ever See much less eat grass.
> They are fed a mixture 
> > of nutrients, grain, meat by-products (usually
> cross species i.e. pig 
> > rendering in the cattle food and vice versa)
> antibiotics and in some 
> > cases growth enhancement chemicals. (read
> hormones). Of course it's all 
> > under the watchful eye of the USDA! GULP!
> 
> I stick my fingers in a ears and hum at you. ;-)
> 
> Yeah, it's pretty bad when roadkill has more diverse
> food sources than 
> most commercial sources of food. 
>  
> > By the way, I consume around 2 to 3 pounds of the
> stuff sold at the fast
> > food places on a weekly basis. When your on the
> road fixing radio's you
> > lunch prospects aren't all the great. 
> BUUaaarrrpp! (fftt) 
> 
> Unless of course, you want roadkill, and a 110W
> radio just doesn't heat 
> fast enough to be effective for heating purposes --
> unless you want to use 
> the radio as a hot plate, and then it might be worth
> it. 
> 
> --
> Kris Kirby, KE4AHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>"BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING
> YOU!"
>  This message brought to you by the US Department of
> Homeland Security
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/