Re: [Samba] Unable to "rsync" in samba share.... please help !!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi updatemyself . schrieb: > Hai All, > how i can synchronise to samba share with out changing any Windows user or > group permission > i tried the following command.. but its keep only the master folder's > permission.. but not for al sub folders. > after synchronise, while i check "rsync" comand unable to synchronise with > the same Windows > user and group permission > now i have to set... the windows permission.. after each and every > synchronisation > this is the command i use.. for synchronisation > rsync -vcrRuHWog --progress MMCH /vol08_800/ > its successfully synchronise all files.. but not with user and group > permission > i use " -o " option to synchronise with same owner permission > and " -g " option to synchronise with same group permission > even then the command didnt gived me the correct result that i expect... > All the permission i set from Windows 2003 ADS > Hope some one can help me... > thank you in advance, Normally I synchronize with the follow command without any problems: rsync -aPx --numeric-ids / someserver:/storage_location This will also migrate user/group identities on the files... kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDdeqypF3l9rYt4bARAmEQAKCD5m3kWXfscRlGjWVqKmi+3yMX8wCfVl02 9/loReXpvr8XwxZSbeK47wQ= =/LbT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] two different logins?
Hi Zitat von Sascha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No ideas? Windows is not able to connect to the same server with two different users. The first one authenticated as "nobody", the second one was with the supplied username/password. You have to manually delete the network connection of the user "nobody". After then you will be able to connect to the desired share with the given username and password. kindly regards rOger > > --- Sascha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > im using samba version 3.0.20pre2-1 and w2k as > > workstation. Domain logins work fine. But when i try > > to open a share (e.g. \\server\share) it aks for a > > user/pass. Thats okay because the user doesnt have > > the > > permissions. So i try to login with an admin user. > > But > > then i get the error "The specified logon > > information > > is in conflict to the existing logon information." > > So > > is there any chance to open a share with a different > > user? Or does Windows have a problem with that? > > > > Best regards and thanks in advance > > > > > > > > > > __ > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following > > URL and read the > > instructions: > > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > > > > __ > Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. > http://farechase.yahoo.com > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Overloaded samba server. Is it a bug?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all Martin Scandroli schrieb: Martin: Which kernel are you using? Do you use quota on your filesystem? >>> >>>This is a SLES9 running >>>kernel-bigsmp-2.6.5-7.201.i586 >>> >>>We had also had problems with later version >>>kernel-bigsmp-2.6.5-7.193.i586 >>> >>>Note: We decided to run 32bits kernel on the EM64T Intel platform. >> >>Can you reproduce this problem on a different filesystem than >>Reiser ? I'm trying to narrow down the problem here. > > Nop. It's quite difficult with 1200 users using it. Hmm... I will try it... we have "only" 500 Users... I think some sort of rsync -aPx --numeric-ids /mountpoint of reiserfs /mountpoint of a laaaggeee sratch disk, creating new filesystem and finally a rsync back to the new fs will do it? Or are there any better solutions? But it will take some days for all necessary steps like backup and so on... kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDavDzpF3l9rYt4bARAsVsAJ4toYFdfWyBZogs9MeVOsCgh889fACfWX+A AFhRWw4mVJUu6IwRji3MbVM= =bBai -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Overloaded samba server. Is it a bug?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Allison schrieb: >>>Martin: Which kernel are you using? Do you use quota on your filesystem? >>> >> >>This is a SLES9 running >>kernel-bigsmp-2.6.5-7.201.i586 >> >>We had also had problems with later version >>kernel-bigsmp-2.6.5-7.193.i586 >> >>Note: We decided to run 32bits kernel on the EM64T Intel platform. > > > Can you reproduce this problem on a different filesystem than > Reiser ? I'm trying to narrow down the problem here. Is there a simple way to convert from reiserfs to another fs? ;-) kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDallJpF3l9rYt4bARAqipAJwNBtDWxF6f+FjehkgIHAREyf6VAwCePdnH RXL/+J2ouMQhUad03R+7a4g= =1bKB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Overloaded samba server. Is it a bug?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, hi list Martin schrieb: > Roger, > > On Thursday 03 November 2005 03:22, Roger Eisenecher wrote: >>Martin schrieb: >> >>>1TB with reiserfs in LVM >> >>We have a similar installation: Kernel 2.6.5-7.201-smp (the official >>kernel of SuSE 9.1 Professional) and we are using openldap and reiserfs >>too. Additonally we are using quota on the filesystem. Our server hangs >>often in this situation with a load of 350!!! The interesting part is >>that the cpu's are 92% idle. If we deactivate the quota subsystem the >>server will work for a longer time, but it could also happen that the >>load reaches 350... Only a reboot will solve this problem... > > This is exacltly our same sympthom. > We have already disable the quota without success. Still got the problem. > >>Martin: Which kernel are you using? Do you use quota on your filesystem? >> > This is a SLES9 running > kernel-bigsmp-2.6.5-7.201.i586 > > We had also had problems with later version > kernel-bigsmp-2.6.5-7.193.i586 > > Note: We decided to run 32bits kernel on the EM64T Intel platform. Interesting: We use also a 32bit kernel with our dual opteron server. Did you experience other symptoms like that the file system does not respond to shell commands like ls? kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDagrRpF3l9rYt4bARAj33AJ4lm2gLF3EwweIc/hTvCI5FLjajzwCgjeHR bkPq2d3cxkZ1f02l6YR9xcM= =dpAN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Overloaded samba server. Is it a bug?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dragan, hi list Dragan Krnic schrieb: >>>1TB with reiserfs in LVM >> >>We have a similar installation: Kernel 2.6.5-7.201-smp (the official >>kernel of SuSE 9.1 Professional) and we are using openldap and reiserfs >>too. Additonally we are using quota on the filesystem. Our server hangs >>often in this situation with a load of 350!!! The interesting part is >>that the cpu's are 92% idle. If we deactivate the quota subsystem the >>server will work for a longer time, but it could also happen that the >>load reaches 350... Only a reboot will solve this problem... >> >>Martin: Which kernel are you using? Do you use quota on your filesystem? > > My 2 Eurocents: With the same setup I've had a similar problem > when there was a slight inconsistency in the spelling of a user > name in the group. Can you exclude the possibility that a user > name is misspelled somewhere? I'm pretty sure that we have no misspelled user names because we do all administrative tasks with some scripts and they will always the proper user names... kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDagn0pF3l9rYt4bARAi1HAJ9hTTZpd+bm0cMtxmHGGvDL94D7DACfbC4e ZdaWpX3aSLSWKHtuos5T7TY= =WQaA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Overloaded samba server. Is it a bug?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all Martin schrieb: > 1TB with reiserfs in LVM We have a similar installation: Kernel 2.6.5-7.201-smp (the official kernel of SuSE 9.1 Professional) and we are using openldap and reiserfs too. Additonally we are using quota on the filesystem. Our server hangs often in this situation with a load of 350!!! The interesting part is that the cpu's are 92% idle. If we deactivate the quota subsystem the server will work for a longer time, but it could also happen that the load reaches 350... Only a reboot will solve this problem... Martin: Which kernel are you using? Do you use quota on your filesystem? kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDaayqpF3l9rYt4bARAjEvAKCdbxqnPdOzSYknCrhcHsqBk2wepACeLEkX 1NBcWZ3DrXmncaQz+qQuXdM= =s2NN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Duplicate sambaSID - How to avoid?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi List We habe about 150 Clients in our network. All clients are participants of the domain. We deploy our images with Ghost. The image is prepared with SYSPREP which will generate a new SID on the first boot of the machine. We automated the process to join the machines automatically to our domain with some tools. Our Domain server runs with samba 3.0.13, OpenLDAP as the backend and smbldap-tools. In most cases the machines could join the domain without any problems. But sometimes samba tries to join them with an already existing sambaSID so the join will fail. The corresponding entries in the log file looks like: [2005/11/01 16:11:57, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_add_sam_account(1795) ldapsam_add_sam_account: SID 'S-1-5-21-3654624081-408594837-1692793938-3108' a lready in the base, with samba attributes [2005/11/01 16:11:57, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_create_user(2350) could not add user/computer sysw2130$ to passdb. Check permissions? [2005/11/01 16:11:58, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) And yes, samba is right: The given sambaSID exists already in LDAP for another machine. So my question: Could someone explain me how the sambaSID will be calculated? How could it happen that two different machines get the same sambaSID? Any suggestions are very welcome ;-) kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDZ5y5pF3l9rYt4bARAnbtAJ45V72DCzNErTysyjSXhSPo4BjtugCdGqu6 aje0riiiJJT76xbFsGKckBA= =tm1w -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] same sambaSID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Natxo Asenjo schrieb: > samba 3.14 with ldapsam, working fine. > > I tried this usrmngr.exe thingie because one of our admins is very > gui-oriented, wanted to see if it worked fine. > > For most users, it is. I can change details, logon hours, groups, passwords. > But for 3 of them I get this message: > > ldapsam_getsampwsid: More than one user with SID > [S-1-5-21-3707708495-1570892323-1667890705-3076]. Failing. count=3 > > I check in a dump of the ldap database, and indeed, they do have the same > sid. To my knowledg they were added with the smbldap-tools which work fine, > in fact I just tested it, new user, different sid. > > How can i fix this? Removing the users and recreating them? Interesting to hear that because I had the same problem with machine accounts. My question was how the sambaSID will be generated but I did not receive any answer to this question... Our only solution was to remove the old account and recreate them. kindly regards rOger PS: We are using even the smbldap-tools, OpenLDAP and Samba 3.0.13. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDXTyVpF3l9rYt4bARAnF+AJ4k7Qh3kMLdxXsmaOxEeq6ygA7wigCeKCeO q2qCwizi4+chjXQ1iVVg4Qk= =qKNK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] sambaSID generation for machine accounts...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi List We are using Samba 3.0.13 with LDAP as our backend. We are using WinXP in our environement where we reload the machines from time to time with some imaging technology. During this process the machines joins automatically the (samba-) domain. In most cases this works without problems. But some machines could not join the domain due some error while joinig the domain. After some investigation I found in the log file of samba that the machine which tried to join the domain generated a sambaSID which was already used for another machine. So my question how could this happen? Any ideas? kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDM+K6pF3l9rYt4bARAisDAKCfGhjDh9pfikhMIcbFcf8Qfq/lgQCfXTiA nV0+vYfEugHm3A3o+fzsXLg= =eSFX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Solved] Re: [Samba] any known issue with printing from MS Access ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb: > Ilia Chipitsine wrote: > > |> MS Access is known to have issues with certain drivers > |> if they have not been initialized on the server properly. > |> > | > | so, MS Access wants something from samba which it > | cannot do at all ? > > No. But I think you both need to re-read the documentation > on printing in the Samba-HOWTO0-Collection to really understand > what a non-initialized driver is. If you have read that and > it still doesn't make sense, then I will try to clarify. I was absolutly sure that I have everything done as described in the howto. But I rechecked every thing and every setting of the printers and it looks like I was wrong or did something wrong; Now everything works as expeceted also from Access without any glitches!!! Ilia: Follow every step in the howto and recheck every thing! Jerry: Thank you! kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDLuMgpF3l9rYt4bARAp/kAJ9Rhxi8IsSNYdl3P1L6oOEfAVXj/QCeOTRc JYus9RJUKOJpCemlHiClByg= =4ulp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] any known issue with printing from MS Access ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb: > Roger Eisenecher wrote: > |>>>can You please test the following: > |>>>a) many networked printers installed, samba/cups is not default printer > |>>>b) only one samba/cups printer is installed and it is default > |>>>I observe problems only in "b)" case. > |>>>Windows XP SP2 + MS Access 2003 (office 2003 sp1), both windows and > |>>>office are russian. > |>>>MS Access in case "b)" do not print and do not work with so called > |>>>"print preview". > | > | It is exactly like you described, but we are using a german versions of > | Windows XP and Access (both with latest patches). > | > | It looks like a bug... > > MS Access is known to have issues with certain drivers > if they have not been initialized on the server properly. Okey. Whats then the right way to initialize the drivers on the server? I installed the printer drivers through the wizard on the server as mentioned in the manuals about samba. Then I set up the standard values for the printer driver on the server. So I thought that so the drivers are correctly initialised. But I also saw that the clients do not honor this settings... kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDLW3NpF3l9rYt4bARAp80AKCEdDF34ns4MHWzYluRYYIR9wqlXwCfZX+M s07FEiVbc607u7ZEYhLdHVk= =ln6B -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] pam_ldap and Samba password change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Anton schrieb: > >>> has nobody this running or is my question to stupid to be worth to get a >>> response? >>> >> >> >> I am using smbldap-passwd (from the smbldap-tools package). This one >> chages both... >> >> rOger >> >> >> >> > yes, smbldap-passwd does the job, but only as root and only on the > machine the samba-server is on. But what to do as a Linux-User that > wants to be able to log in to any windows machine in the network too? > how does he change his password? when he types 'passwd' on the shell of > his Linux machine, the ldap-password on the server is changed, but not > the samba-password and this is my problem. Hmm... OpenLDAP has an option to maintain password fields himself... but I do not remember the required configuration steps for that... perhaps another one on this list could help... kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDLIxRpF3l9rYt4bARApzkAJ4/UXBGYs1riGz5VUUwlRJ3u8KP2wCfe2bq zV2OqjOh5BOl/MEDePWIfn0= =ecN0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] pam_ldap and Samba password change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Anton schrieb: > Christian Anton wrote: > >> Hi everybody, >> >> i have set up a Samba PDC with LDAP Backend as described in this howto: >> >> http://de.gentoo-wiki.com/Samba_PDC_mit_LDAP-Backend >> >> Everything runs fine now. I also changed configuration of my linux >> boxes to authenticate against the ldap server. >> >> When i log in into windows and change my user password, the Unix >> password of my user is also changed, when i type passwd on a linux >> box, it changes the unix password of the user in the ldap, but not the >> samba password also stored in ldap. >> >> Is there any chance to make passwd change the samba password too? >> Maybe possible with pam_ldap, but i did not find anything about this >> on the web. >> >> >> Help would be appreciated! >> >> >> Christian > > > has nobody this running or is my question to stupid to be worth to get a > response? I am using smbldap-passwd (from the smbldap-tools package). This one chages both... rOger - -- Mit besten Grüssen Roger Eisenecher/icER GmbH +----- | PGP Public Key -> http://www.icer.ch/contact/eisenecher_pub_key.txt +- | Roger Eisenecher mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ic engineering & research GmbH Tel: +41 (0)52/223'13'70 | Grondweg 15 Fax: +41 (0)52/223'13'71 | CH-8266 Steckbornhttp://www.icer.ch/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDLAdFpF3l9rYt4bARAkSyAJ90B7Ii1QG0Fhvf9YjH11+wIRoY8QCgk7D9 O8YA/WIMnIAlaSesgB88eDE= =/tSX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] any known issue with printing from MS Access ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ilia Chipitsine schrieb: > can You please test the following: > a) many networked printers installed, samba/cups is not default printer > b) only one samba/cups printer is installed and it is default > I observe problems only in "b)" case. > Windows XP SP2 + MS Access 2003 (office 2003 sp1), both windows and > office are russian. > MS Access in case "b)" do not print and do not work with so called > "print preview". > > It is exactly like you described, but we are using a german versions of > Windows XP and Access (both with latest patches). > > It looks like a bug... > >> to be certain, it can be either bug of printer driver or samba/cups, >> what is the printer You are using ? We are using HP Laserjet 2300DN printers (all handled by samba/cups). I am not 100% sure but if I remember correctly we had the same problem with the cups postscript printer driver. Perhaps samba does not maintain correct standard values for network printer? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDLAa5pF3l9rYt4bARAhV8AJ4g9n2ANnzr71L+gTi70hg7vvUJ8QCfdoHH GeWkeeF4vsOt4H+g9gis9mc= =hKNY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] any known issue with printing from MS Access ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> can You please test the following: > >> a) many networked printers installed, samba/cups is not default printer > >> b) only one samba/cups printer is installed and it is default > >> I observe problems only in "b)" case. > >> Windows XP SP2 + MS Access 2003 (office 2003 sp1), both windows and >> office are russian. > >> MS Access in case "b)" do not print and do not work with so called >> "print preview". It is exactly like you described, but we are using a german versions of Windows XP and Access (both with latest patches). It looks like a bug... kindly regards, rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDK9kBpF3l9rYt4bARAgFlAJ9zT+tk4B4wNV28TiZO0qpbJ2HG2gCfSNOa nzvM2y28CAtX7o4E+wSN1dE= =R2s8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] What is going on with my samba?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List!!!
Please spend my some light on my problem!
I'm using samba 3.0.13 in a large environement because we had problems
with the normal tdb-passwd backend we reinstalled our environement with
samba and we are using now the ldap backend. For our administrative
tasks we are using the smbldap-tools from idealx. We are not very happy
with this solution because we have some effects we do not like and we do
not know why they happen:
* Some machines produces a smabaSID which already exist for another
machine when the try to join the domain. How are the sambaSIDs determined?
* Users suddenly couldn't log on to the domain and I do not know why.
Usually a password reset solves the problem: For your reference here I
have a such an account which could not log in:
- --
BBWdata:~ # smbldap-usershow 95FeYuekseldi
dn: uid=95FeYuekseldi,ou=ia2005b,ou=Users,dc=bbw-informatik,dc=private
objectClass: top,inetOrgPerson,posixAccount,shadowAccount,sambaSamAccount
cn: Fevzi Yuekseldi (IA2005b)
sn: 95FeYuekseldi
uid: 95FeYuekseldi
uidNumber: 1531
gidNumber: 1029
homeDirectory: /home/students/ia2005b/95FeYuekseldi
loginShell: /bin/bash
gecos: Fevzi Yuekseldi (IA2005b)
description: Fevzi Yuekseldi (IA2005b)
sambaLogonTime: 0
sambaLogoffTime: 2147483647
sambaKickoffTime: 2147483647
sambaPwdCanChange: 0
displayName: Fevzi Yuekseldi (IA2005b)
sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3654624081-408594837-1692793938-4062
sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-3654624081-408594837-1692793938-3059
sambaLogonScript: netlogon.bat
sambaHomeDrive: Z:
sambaLMPassword: 98E3A020CE037532C98AA516A07044E4
sambaAcctFlags: [U]
sambaNTPassword: 6E5795E3B2C1AAECE939D8F20B9586DE
sambaPwdLastSet: 1124683686
sambaPwdMustChange: 1275883686
userPassword: {SSHA}Cpf7K+MTWKrPf8Tx7TV74wkn2hprYXNn
- --
We are using OpenLdap 2.2.6 (LDAP server supplied with SuSE 9.1
Professional).
Any suggestions are welcome ;-)
kindly regards
rOger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDKmbLpF3l9rYt4bARArt0AJ9sKPifrPZ0y8llbKKR+ZqGGc0mMACfVsA/
86wHi5j06R/cbtGGRx3glWk=
=gDsZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: [idx-smbldap-tools ] smbldap-tools and joining workstation to domain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andres Andres Toomsalu schrieb: > The problem is that smbldap-useradd -w 'machinename' will add only > posixAccount entrys into ldap but it should add both posixAccount and > sambaSAMAccount entrys. > > So if one doesn't add correct machine account entrys manually to ldap > the windows workstation domain joining is impossible. As Jerome said samba would add the additional necessary attributes when the workstation joins the domain. The ldap script has only to add the posix stuff. I do not know if this is correct because sometimes I have also the problem that some workstations could not join the domain. If I check then the ldap I could only see the entries necessary for a posixAccount. If I delete this information from ldap my workstation is able to join the domain which failed before... But only 2 to 5 of 200 workstations will fail... I hope this will help you. kindly regards rOger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCohFgpF3l9rYt4bARAowhAJ0QgNETJ8lMRO1lER3hAYwDJgSDDACcDy/C N4KB4IuE3zeVPn6WeKoFPfw= =P8d4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
