[Samba] Security=user half as fast as share. Why?
samba1.20.cdunham at spamgourmet.com escreveu: > I'm running Suse 9.2 (kernel 2.6.8-24) with Samba 3.0.20b > > When I use security=user, my read/write performance is less than half > the peformance with security=share. Why? There are no other changes, > but performance is never better than half the speed. This happens with > WinXP, Win2K and Win98 clients, so I don't think the client > configuration is the problem. Network is gigabit, with Intel Pro/1000 > adapters. Did you setup the socket options? security = share has five "extra" steps to check the user, perhaps it could be a delay from the backend (LDAP or winbind). Kind regards, I'm not sure what you mean by socket options. My smb.conf is shown below. I'm not using LDAP or winbind. No domain, just a workgroup. My smb.conf file is: [global] workgroup = MYWORKGROUP netbios name = SERVER1 wins support = yes domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 65 map to guest = Bad User restrict anonymous = no server signing = Auto [test] comment = test path = /home/users read only = no guest ok = yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Security=user half as fast as share. Why?
samba1.20.cdunham at spamgourmet.com escreveu: > I'm running Suse 9.2 (kernel 2.6.8-24) with Samba 3.0.20b > > When I use security=user, my read/write performance is less than half > the peformance with security=share. Why? There are no other changes, > but performance is never better than half the speed. This happens with > WinXP, Win2K and Win98 clients, so I don't think the client > configuration is the problem. Network is gigabit, with Intel Pro/1000 > adapters. Did you setup the socket options? security = share has five "extra" steps to check the user, perhaps it could be a delay from the backend (LDAP or winbind). Kind regards, I'm not sure what you mean by socket options. My smb.conf is shown below. I'm not using LDAP or winbind. No domain, just a workgroup. My smb.conf file is: [global] workgroup = MYWORKGROUP netbios name = SERVER1 wins support = yes domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 65 map to guest = Bad User restrict anonymous = no server signing = Auto [test] comment = test path = /home/users read only = no guest ok = yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Security=user half as fast as share. Why?
I'm running Suse 9.2 (kernel 2.6.8-24) with Samba 3.0.20b When I use security=user, my read/write performance is less than half the peformance with security=share. Why? There are no other changes, but performance is never better than half the speed. This happens with WinXP, Win2K and Win98 clients, so I don't think the client configuration is the problem. Network is gigabit, with Intel Pro/1000 adapters. My smb.conf file is: [global] workgroup = MYWORKGROUP netbios name = SERVER1 wins support = yes domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 65 map to guest = Bad User ;security = share restrict anonymous = no server signing = Auto [test] comment = test path = /home/users read only = no guest ok = yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
