[RCSE] Reports on NSP Softik-Acro
Has anyone built and flown the NSP Softik-Acro? Looks like a nice novice-level aileron electric plane for smaller fields, etc. I would like to hear about any opinions/impressions. Dan Leon RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [RCSE] Mr. NiCd?
I ordered from them a couple times this year. Great service, great products. What more can I say? I know, I would buy from them again. Aloha to all on RCSE, Al Battad - WH6VE AMA #506981 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [RCSE] Mr. NiCd? Hi All, need to know what experiences folks have had with Batteries of America. Quality, service, etc. Please post to the exchange, I'm sure others would like to know. TIA, Rich RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] HLG battery life questions
Discharge rate of 125 MA. Looking at my records, for some reason these packs were not tested when new, but that was only maybe three months ago anyway. My 110s tested at 115-120 MAh with the same discharge current. Recognizing that the tester could be giving an erroneous reading with so high a discharge rate, I would still expect the real-world life of the 80s to approach better than 50 perrcent of the 110s, if not higher. If I can ascertain whether NiMH cells can be charged with the same equipment as NiCADs, I'll go that route, since it seems that much more capacity is available with less weight. I'm running an experiment now along those lines. Film at 11. - Original Message - From: "Steven Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tom Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 7:11 PM Subject: Re: [RCSE] HLG battery life questions > So to properly test an 80 mah you need a discharge current of 80 ma. Not > many testers will go this low. Typically at 5C (400ma) discharge you could > see a 30% decrease from Rated Capacity. > > I agree the 35-43 mah does seem low, as long as your discharge current was > not too terribly high. > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] passaj
At 08:05 PM 9/11/2000, Rick Brown and Jill Wiest wrote: >Anybody on the list that can pronounce 'PASSAJ' Pass a J? Sorry, couldn't resist... 8-) RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] HLG battery life questions
At 10:10 PM 9/10/00 -0700, Tom Watson wrote: >... Seems like my "80 MAh" packs are delivering 35-43 MAh...in other >words, they Remember Standard Capacity NiCd ratings use a discharge of 1C, temp of 23 deg C, and an end-of-discharge voltage (EODV) of 0.9 volts. EODV may be different on each tester, a lot of them use 1.0 v, because realistically the discharge curve is quite steep at 0.9v. So to properly test an 80 mah you need a discharge current of 80 ma. Not many testers will go this low. Typically at 5C (400ma) discharge you could see a 30% decrease from Rated Capacity. I agree the 35-43 mah does seem low, as long as your discharge current was not too terribly high. The best method is to test your cells when new. Note the capacity then test them periodically. Large capacity packs I can typically expect 120% - 150% above Rated Capacity, but my smaller HLG cells 90% - 100% is good. That is because the HLG cells are being discharged at a 3C rate. Just to make things a little cloudy... After all what capacity rating are we talking about anyway. According to the GE NiCd Application Handbook the following are different capacity ratings for a cell. 1. Standard Capacity 2. Rated Capacity 3. Actual Capacity 4. Retained Capacity 5. Available Capacity 6. Dischargeable Capacity Steve Meyer http://SOARchicago.com/stmeyer/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] S.O.A.R. Web Page http://SOARchicago.com/ RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Re: AMD Cyclone - any good???
>Anyone flown/seen the AMD Cyclone wingeron ship... >Seems to be "too good" at the advertised price... >Bill Gillis >Reno, NV Bill, I thought the same thing, so I bought one. I've only stared to 'build' it (if you can call it that since it's almost done). Here's my impressions on the kit: Good: 1) The wings and empenage are great! Very solid, pre-sheeted wings with nice leading and trailing edges and nice wing tips. Also, they have pre-installed metal mounts for the wing rod and servo pins. There reaaly is nothing to do here but cover or paint and then slide them on the wing rod. Nice. 2) The service was very good. A little strange trying to order via the website. I ended up just emailing them. But once they had my order, I received the plane in just over a week (8 days). That's from Hong Kong to San Francisco, CA. Nice again. 3) The hardward (except the wing rod - see below) is well put together. It comes with well machined servo attachments including set screws for the servo pins and an allen wrench. OK: 1) The bag looks a big cheesy: bright (and I mean _bright_) pink and purple. It seems like it'll protect the plane, however, and that's all that really matters, right? ;) I mean, nobody at the field will have anything mean to say when you blind them with your plane's bag, right? 2) The fuselage seems a bit weak. It is pretty to look at, but it looks like it'll need some CF reinforcement. Not-so-good: 1) The instructions leave a lot to be desired. If you've ever built a plane or two before, though, you shouldn't have too much of a problem. 2) The wing rod is weak. I've heard of other pilots who bent theirs in high winds. Overall, I'm pretty impressed with the kit. With a few mods, I should have a nice flying wingeron ship. For around $120 including shipping from Hong Kong for a plane that's nearly pre-built, I'd say that's hard to beat. Cheers! Brad Redwood City, CA RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Mr. NiCd?
>Hi All, need to know what experiences folks have had with Batteries of >America. Quality, service, etc. Please post to the exchange, I'm sure others >would like to know. TIA, Rich Fast service, and a nice product. I've ordered about 4 times from them and have always gotten exactly what I was hoping to get in a timely manner. They make just about anything you can think of, and will give you any configuration that you can dream up. Describe what you want, and they'll tell you what they have that fits the bill. The quality of the cell assembly looks very good (haven't had to open a pack up, but could see through a couple of packs that had clear shrinkwrap). Connectors are solid, and clean. The only thing that I can think of that I would have changed on any of my orders was to have a longer lead on the 150mAh rx packs that I received. Other rx packs seemed to have longer leads (who knows why?). - David [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] where to put the
I have used copper tape to the outer panel and wrap around down the cross section area of the junction to the center piece. A position matching second wrap will begin at the opposite cross section area to the center panel, the tape will end short to the fuselage, or if you will, run all the way into the fuse near the structure center. Remember to place a small piece of copper wool (not steel wool) at the junction of the two wrap around to take up the possible gap and remove intermittent contact. An intermittent electrical contact will 'phase' modulate the in coming signal before it enters the Rx, the result is servo chattering. Any other gentle but high resilient metal can also be use reliably. Once again, the dipole will compose of two 39 inches of wire/strip mounted opposite on one axis. The measurement will be reference from the divergent point at the center fuselage. Cut short to wing tip when 39 inches is reached. Do not run all the way to the tip beyond 39 inches. If you have a CF wing skin, we need one tape on top panel and one opposite down the bottom panel, all tape length will be 39 inches, top and bottom. Let me know if I have addressed your question. YK - Original Message - From: Richard Hallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have used the antenna as suggested in a two piece wing with one piece of > tape in one and the other end of the dipole in the other. > > But what is your suggestion in a three piece wing in which the center > section is 50 inches and the two tips each 35? This makes the center > section only twenty five inches long in either direction if the Rx is in the > middle. > > Thankyou. > > Rick > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] RE: Delay -- Move RCSE to another list server?
After dealing with the commercial-ridden service from eGroups, the Zagi list moved (somewhat officially) over to the Topica service. Nice and lean interface, and not too many ads for now. http://www.topica.com/ - David [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] RE: (spoiler return springs)
>I like connecting spoilers to servo with fine metal >cable pushrods (Sullivan 507 VERY FLEXIBLE). >That way the servo opens =and= closes the spoilers. >Less fiddling, and they stay closed when inverted. I used this method on my Olympic-II. I had already installed the "dial cord" method using tubing that was the exact same as the sheath for 507 cable. I just bought a pack of Sullivan 507 cables (later buying a big pack of it for about $8 or so to use in handlaunch gliders), and pushed it through the pipes. I can't give the exact URL to the original document where I saw this idea, but I think it came from the Charles River RC club's kit modification page for the Oly-II. I used brass tubing on the ends of the cables and passed both through a servo connector. Works fine, and is very positive on opening and closing. Just make sure that both spoiler control arms are the same distance from the hinge and line up with your cable guides. - David [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Hold the Chiles please
I just installed Eudora 5.0 An interesting feature is that Eudora will rate a message for offensive content. 1 Chile = "Might be offensive" 2 Chiles = "Probably offensive" 3 Chiles = "Message is on fire" Now I'll be able to spot those flaming messages before I even open them. So hold the indigestion please. :-) Steve Meyer http://SOARchicago.com/stmeyer/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] S.O.A.R. Web Page http://SOARchicago.com/ RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Help Ventus 2C
I have a Ventus 2C 150" molded Scale Glider. Each wing half has pockets for 3 servos, Flap, aileron, aileron, The wing has 2 breaks at the tip so the trailing edge has hinged sections for a flap, aileron, aileron and a 4.5" moveable section at the tip. The question is " How do I drive that tip section. That tip section is at an angle, so that taping will cause strain as the sections spread when deflected and versa when raised. Any help will be appreciated. Chuck Auerbach RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Fiberglass Tail Boom - Genie
Burke. . .glad you asked! I do not know what you will have if you put on a separate boom without the curved fuselage, but it won't look like a GENIE, not likely perform like one or otherwise stand up to expectations. Your concern about weight is misplaced, as this larger than typical ship needs it to perform best. 10-11 oz. per sq. ft of wing loading is easily handled. That means 90-100 oz. all up weight, which at the lighter figure equates to a wing loading of around 64 oz. on a ship with say 900 sq. in of area. Too, there is a significant scale effect related to the larger span and area involved. It simply handles the weight better and needs it to not flounder around like some big floater. This baby can move. It is not delicate. The segment of the fuselage behind the wing where you would attach a boom is subject to breakage in landings where the tail whips around and catches hard. Very recently, and in my last personal GENIE, my 18th, I have placed 8" long ply doublers in the area of the rear former by the wing TE, for this very reason. One broke there and that avoids the problem. Using the skinny, rectangular cross section ply box, that begins the fuselage construction, these doublers are easy to incorporate. Doing so with a round tube to get the same level of reinforcement at that point is not feasible. Ready for glassing the GENIE fuselage, with fin, canopy, towhook blocking, stab pushrod, stab bellcrank, pivot tube for the main wire, etc. typically weighs 12-1/2 oz. Glassing/painting adds around 2 oz. This is no flimsy structure that is going to get compression breaks or shatter on typical hard landings. I've buried these noses 15" into the ground without the fuselage breaking. Yes, I know that fiberglas shells can come in at 6-8 oz. which sounds light, but there are things to add and they are not 58 inches long and will not stand a gorilla grip behind the wing. The GENIE is a much larger airframe than most contemporary ones. I have made all the possible mistakes already in developing the fuselage over near 50 personal Jousters and Genies. Trust me. There is no need for you to repeat them thinking you will improve things. Further, and this can be confirmed by reviewing the material on Mike Selig's Opus in the NSP catalog, there are aerodynamic reasons for the droop snoot and the curvature of the fuselage that would be defeated going to another profile. You would also pay heck trying to secure the 5/16" balsa fin in the end of the round tube. As is, it fits firmly between the interior of the flat slab sides. On rare occasion, I have snapped a fuselage at the front of the fin. The way the fuselage is made, this is repairable. You need only remove the ply doublers in the area, the CF between them and the slab sides and put in new doublers and CF. With balsa added over this again, glassed over and repainted, the repair is hardly noticeable. This a tall fin and rudder. You could expect any light tube to snap at the front of the fin with little provocation. No disparagement is meant toward friend John's boom construction. For this application, however, the standard fuselage as detailed in the plans and website, is the way to go. BTW, one intended "GENIE" was built with a separate boom and a V-tail. It is now in the hands of its 3rd owner. It is not a GENIE. Stick to the script, huh? Others reading this who would like a look at the GENIE, go to http://www.proptwisters.org/jouster2/ and click on link #3. -- > From: Burke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [RCSE] Fiberglass Tail Boom - Genie > Date: Monday, September 11, 2000 6:43 AM > > I ran across some neat techniques by a guy named John O'Sullivan for forming > a rolled fuselage tail boom. I am in the process of building a Genie > (designed by Harley Michaelis), and I thought this might be neat to try on > this fuselage. I really like the design of the droopy nose that the Genie > fuselage has, but would like to try to save some weight in the tail boom. > So what I was thinking of doing is building a wood fuselage from just behind > the trailing edge of the wing, to the nose. This would allow me to keep the > droopy nose design and then go with a rolled fiberglass tail boom from just > behind the TE of the wing to the tail. > > I would think this would be lighter, to save some nose weight. My biggest > question is about the strength of the joint between the wood (front) portion > of the fuse and the tail cone. Is this a high stress area of the fuselage? > It seems that most of the fiberglass fuselages I have seen break have broken > back in the tail boom just in from of the fin at about the 1/3 to 1/2 span > point from the tail to the TE of the wing. This would seem to indicate the > joint I am worried about probably does not get that much stress, and should > be fairly easily reinforced. > > I know there have been gliders designed in the past that use a method > similar to this, but I have nev
[RCSE] Help-Ventus 2c
I have a Ventus 2C 150" molded Scale Glider. Each wing half has pockets for 3 servos, Flap, aileron, aileron, The wing has 2 breaks at the tip so the trailing edge has hinged sections for a flap, aileron, aileron and a 4.5" moveable section at the tip. The question is " How do I drive that tip section. That tip section is at an angle, so that taping will cause strain as the sections spread when deflected and versa when raised. Any help will be appreciated. Chuck Auerbach RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] Apogee .pdf prints
Lots of places, John. Kinko's might do it, but if not, go to a printing shop. Lot's of them are set up to do desktop publishing, including handling pdf's, etc. Matt - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "RCSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 8:41 PM Subject: [RCSE] Apogee .pdf prints > Hi, > Does anyone know where I could get full size prints from the Apogee > plans on the CharlesRiver site. My printer is an old dot matrix that > doesn't print the .pdf files to scale. I have the right printer driver, > etc. > Would anyone be willing to sell prints of these plans? Does anyone > work at, or know of a copy center that can print .pdf files? > > John > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Fwd: Saturday Sept 16th. invitation to fly at the Junior Air Races and Hobby Fair at North Valley Regional Sports Complex
As most of you are aware, we are having our first annual Air Race Slope Bash on Sept 16, 2000. This is a fun fly event that will take place at the Red Rock site beginning around 1:00 PM. If you don't know anything about it, then go to http://www.scrollsander.com/AirRaceFunFly.htm and get the latest information. However, our day of flying begins earlier than you know. We have been invited by the Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) to participate in their annual Junior Air Races. They are not actually Air Races. It is an event sponsored by the PARD to get the community out for a hobby fair. S3 has been asked to come out and show and fly our airplanes. We have been also been encouraged to bring out airplanes that the public can fly. This means Highlanders and anything else you might be willing to buddy box someone on. The "Junior Air Race" event will take place from 9:00AM to 1:00PM at the North Valley Regional Sports Complex in Stead. The park is located at 8085 Silver Lake Road, just off of Stead Blvd. From 395, take the Stead exit and turn right on Silver Lake Blvd. (your first right I think). Drive until you see the sports complex. We flew there once before during ground-breaking ceremonies a couple years ago. S3 will have a booth/table to display things. We will provide information about the club, give away model magazines, and hand out information about the slope event that will take place later that day. Hopefully we will have our banner completed by that time. If you have something special that you would like to contribute to this event, or have some good ideas about how to make it better, please send the information along, or bring it to the field on the morning of the 16th. We will likely be flying with the Reno Radio Control Club. We will use their frequency board if they decide to participate. Else, we will use our own. Come early and give yourself time to get through the Reno Air Race traffic and to help set up if you want. Whatever you choose to do, BRING YOUR AIRPLANES AND FLY! REMEMBER TO THINK SAFETY FIRST WHEN FLYING THIS WEEKEND! We will have our regular scheduled club contest on the 17th. This is the normal day. We are not rescheduling the contest. But if you can't fly two days in a row, we will have a fun fly at Laura Springs on the 24th. Through this Hobby Fair event, I came into contact with a park director that has indicated to me that right now is an excellent time to talk to the planners of the North Valley Complex about providing an area of the park for flying. It is possible we can have a launch and landing area. I will be discussing this further with the park director and getting more details. Take care and see you all next Saturday, Oliver I may have missed some interested people in this mailing. If so, please forward this message. Chris, you may want to contact Denise @ 971-8561 about setting up a booth for your Scrollsander product.
[RCSE] CSS Sailaire OD Contest
The Cincinnati Soaring Society Sailaire One Design & Nostalgia Contest September 9, 2000 Ive been tempted to call this contest the Sailaire & Nostalgia Float Fly, but then people would get the idea that were flying gliders off the water. H. The weather forecast for the contest called for a 30 percent chance of rain. Being the optimist, I turned this around to say that we had a 70 percent chance of F-U-N! And thats just what happened, without a drop of rain till after the gates to the field closed. Conditions were great for flying floaters, southerly winds at 5 to 10 kts. But the lift was tough. I repeated our usual Sailaire OD task of 15 minutes all day with runway landings. This made it into a true thermal duration contest, with the emphasis on duration. The early lift was spotty and tight requiring that we rack these big old birds around within a tight core. On the other hand, there was some great sustained low-level scratching going on as well. Ron Allen, up from Louisville, added three minutes to a flight with some consistent tree-top buoyancy that made his big old Sailaire look like a Logic working the low stuff. Two guys stood out for the day, however. In Sailaire, Jack Strother took everybody to the woodshed by scoring five max flights, even in the mornings first round where the next closest Sailaire time was a 7:52 by Ron Allen. In Nostalgia, Paul Siegel showed the way with three maxes, a 10:41 and a 4:55, flying his beautiful Paragon. I made a play for some wood in the Sailaire class, but I proved once again that it doesnt pay to be impatient to fly in an open winch format. On my third round I disregarded all the signs of sink and put up a blistering 1:33 and NO landing! Then on another flight, I slid through a landing and lost my landing score by two inches, with the fuse sitting on top of the landing rope. Ugh! This placed Barry Anderson in third for the day, just 24 points ahead of me. Some notes on format. We flew open winch by rounds all day. We had an hour time limit for the whole group to launch, whether flying one or both classes. Paul Siegel has a great idea to try; setting the flight/launch order according to the seeded scores, with the top fliers launching first. Next Year! Thanks to all of those who come out, and to all of those who helped to pull off a fun contest, including John Measamer, Barry Anderson, Tom Meyer, Jack Strother and Sam Bach. Scores Sailaire Jack Strother 4729 Paul Siegel 3168 Barry Andersen 2523 Rudy Siegel 2499 Ron Allen 1219 Sam Bach 1033 Harry Roe 697 Si Jordan 493 Nostalgia Paul Siegel 4014 Jack Strother 3615 Bill Friend 3140 Tom Meyer 2965 Harry Roe 1936 Ron Allen 1726 Si Jordan 1662 Barry Anderson 421 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] NEW SUBJECT
Wow! I must be lucky because my planes always fly like they're in the toilet! ;) RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RCSE] FORGETABOUTIT!
I've found the best way to not "listen to" topics that I'm not interested in is to set up filters with select words. Anything that has "Sal", "NSP", "HTML" or other select words in the subject goes straight into the trash bin. Another way is to simply block the people that abuse it the most. To me it's much more annoying listening to the constant complaining about the e-mails than it is to just delete them. Everyone has subjects that they don't like to read but others find them helpful. If you're getting the digest version of the list, you're pretty much out of luck using filters. PLEASE, let's just hit delete and not add to the waste of bandwidth complaining about other people's posts. Happy flying, Jimmy (Pardon my waste of bandwidth!) ;) RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Fw: HLG golf
- Original Message - From: Peter Presant To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 12:30 AM Subject: HLG golf Hi there I have just been reading your posts about HLG golf. One thing that was not clear to me was how you scored. Was the glider only required to land on the green or did it have to be within a specified distance? I can understand counting the number of throws, what about the rest? A clarification on this would be gratefully received, I am posting from New Zealand. Peter Presant I originally posted this to the sender's email address. It bounced, so I am posting it to RCSE in the hope the originator will see it and reply. Thanks Peter Presant
[RCSE] Sal bashing
In the two or more years of ordering and returning planes to NSP, I have not had a bad experience with the planes. Yes, Sal can be short at times... but that is because I get his dander up by telling him about our weather here in Hawaii in February. Years ago he accepted a return when I told him the kit was beyond my experience to build (Epsilon W/ ailerons). Within the past two months my orders have been processed and handled as well as I can expect. One Laser 2MC, and one 118" Jade. Sanity ? Perhaps because of some of the questions he is asked to answer. But I will still use his service for my stuff. Aloha, Tom Nakagawa __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] passaj
anybody have flown a Passaj ?
Re: [RCSE] Stylus batteries
I've been using one of the spring loaded holders with NiMh cells for over a year now with no problems. Hand not heard of any problems with them until now. Curious is anyone else has. Happy flying, Jimmy -- Designer/System Integrator for the "Vector P" UAV (http://www.ase.w1.com/vector.html) For the best in sailplane protective carrying soft packs, Airtronics, Diversity Model Aircraft, FMA, Hobby Lobby, Hitec, Multiplex, and Trick R/C go to: http://jtmodels.net or e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] JTModels Web Creations http://members.xoom.com/jtmodels Phone: (727) 372-5914 Fax: (727) 372-5916 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] kicked off...??
..from a telecon with TC it appears I've been off the RCSE net since about the last of August. Now, cannot find proper subscribe message address ..RR. Jimbo in NM RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] Winch line
I know this is a bit redundant, that others have asked and this has previously answered. But, would someone be kind enough to point me in the right direction to secure some winch line. I've got a new to me winch and would love to start trying to wear it out. I'm assuming that most are using in the neighborhood of 220lb? Who stocks this stuff and where and how to reach them would be greatly appreciated. I am also in need of suggestions for retriever line, I need suggestions as to size etc. Thanks in advance, Blake RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RCSE] NSP "EDGE"
Gents, Has anyone had any experience with the open class NSP " Edge "if so, any suggestions on components, handling improvements...yada yada yada, Thanks to all in advance for your help. Gerry Harrison
