Re: Targeting two fields with the same query or one field gathering contents from both ?
Le 17/05/2010 17:49, Marco Martinez a écrit : No, the equivalent for this will be: - A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox) Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C Marco Martínez Bautista http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón Tel.: 91 352 59 42 2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler Hey, let's say I have : - a field named A with specific contents - a field named B with specific contents - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField. Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance : - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox) ?? Thanks, Xavier yes you're right I figured it after posting.
Re: Targeting two fields with the same query or one field gathering contents from both ?
No, the equivalent for this will be: - A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox) Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C Marco Martínez Bautista http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón Tel.: 91 352 59 42 2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler > Hey, > > let's say I have : > > - a field named A with specific contents > > - a field named B with specific contents > > - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField. > > Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance : > > - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox) > - C: (the lazy fox) > > ?? > > Thanks, > > Xavier > > > >
Re: Targeting two fields with the same query or one field gathering contents from both ?
Le 17/05/2010 16:57, Xavier Schepler a écrit : Hey, let's say I have : - a field named A with specific contents - a field named B with specific contents - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField. Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance : - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox) ?? Thanks, Xavier I made some tests and it appears than the second query is much faster than the first ...
Targeting two fields with the same query or one field gathering contents from both ?
Hey, let's say I have : - a field named A with specific contents - a field named B with specific contents - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField. Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance : - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox) ?? Thanks, Xavier
