Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer ------ needs 2 more IPMC votes please

2007-05-01 Thread kelvin goodson

Many thanks for your prompt attention.  So now we have 15+1s, 1 non binding,
3 IPMC binding and no -1s  I think we can confidently declare this vote
closed.

Regards, Kelvin.

On 01/05/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On 5/1/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ...Please take a look at the summary of
> Andy's activities at the head of the vote thread and cast your vote...

+1

-Bertrand



RE: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-26 Thread Andy Grove

Thanks Kelvin, and thanks to everyone who supported this. I'm happy to
be part of the team. 

My main area of interest is the CTS so if anyone has any suggestions for
improving the CTS, please let me know. I'm currently working on donating
a number of test cases from Rogue Wave's SDO test suite so that they
become part of the CTS.

Thanks,

Andy. 

-Original Message-
From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 26 April 2007 09:41
To: tuscany-dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

That's voting time up and with my +1 that makes 13 +1s (including 1 non
binding) and no -1s so --  Welcome Andy.

Next steps are defined in [1],  If you haven't already submitted a
Contributor License Agreement (CLA) then this need to be done and
acknowledged by ASF before they will create a user id for you. When your
CLA has been acknowledged your name will appear in [2] and will not be
italicized.

Please let me know an apache userid you'd like to use (see [2] for those
that have been taken), along with full name and the email address you
want for forwarding (this must be the same email address as on the CLA).

[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter
[2] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html

Kelvin.

On 23/04/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of 
> 2006, in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As

> some of you may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of

> detail from the lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...
>
>
>- been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
>- did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
>CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including
ensuring
>vendor independence.
>- has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
>between the CTS and the specification
>- developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
>function.
>- provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours
of
>implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
>- has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
>- Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and
>durations
>- developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without
>Schema to SDO Type and Property
>- solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
>equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in
order to
>feed back to the spec group
>- took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS
is
>test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to
assist in
>this goal
>- contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
>- provided support to the community with problems running the CTS
>and with insights into new Junit features
>
> Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++ 
> specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the
project.
>
> Regards, Kelvin.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-26 Thread kelvin goodson

That's voting time up and with my +1 that makes 13 +1s (including 1 non
binding) and no -1s so --  Welcome Andy.

Next steps are defined in [1],  If you haven't already submitted a
Contributor License Agreement (CLA) then this need to be done and
acknowledged by ASF before they will create a user id for you. When your CLA
has been acknowledged your name will appear in [2] and will not be
italicized.

Please let me know an apache userid you'd like to use (see [2] for those
that have been taken), along with full name and the email address you want
for forwarding (this must be the same email address as on the CLA).

[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter
[2] http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html

Kelvin.

On 23/04/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006, in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some
of you may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail
from the lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...


   - been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
   - did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
   CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including ensuring
   vendor independence.
   - has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
   between the CTS and the specification
   - developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
   function.
   - provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
   implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
   - has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
   - Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and
   durations
   - developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without
   Schema to SDO Type and Property
   - solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
   equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in order to
   feed back to the spec group
   - took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
   test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to assist in
   this goal
   - contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
   - provided support to the community with problems running the CTS
   and with insights into new Junit features

Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the project.

Regards, Kelvin.


Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Raymond Feng

+1.

Raymond

- Original Message - 
From: "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "tuscany-dev" 
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:38 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer


Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of 
2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some of 
you

may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from the
lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...


  - been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
  - did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
  CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including 
ensuring

  vendor independence.
  - has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
  between the CTS and the specification
  - developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
  function.
  - provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
  implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
  - has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
  - Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and durations
  - developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without Schema
  to SDO Type and Property
  - solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
  equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in order to
  feed back to the spec group
  - took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
  test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to assist in
  this goal
  - contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
  - provided support to the community with problems running the CTS and
  with insights into new Junit features

Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the 
project.


Regards, Kelvin.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Simon Nash

+1 (non-binding).  Well done.

  Simon

Simon Laws wrote:


On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



+1

On 23/04/07, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 from me
>
> On 4/23/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 Welcome Andy
> >
> > On 4/23/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 from me.
> > >
> > >...ant
> > >
> > > On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since 
November

> of
> > > > 2006,
> > > > in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As
> some of
> > > > you
> > > > may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail
> from
> > > the
> > > > lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >- been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
> > > >- did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO
> Java
> > > >CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design,
> including
> > > > ensuring
> > > >vendor independence.
> > > >- has discovered and offered solutions to a number of 
anomalies

> > > >between the CTS and the specification
> > > >- developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema 
choice

> > > >function.
> > > >- provided good insights to the required and permitted
behaviours
> of
> > > >implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
> > > >- has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
> > > >- Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and
> durations
> > > >- developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML 
without

> > > Schema
> > > >to SDO Type and Property
> > > >- solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to
the
> > > >equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty 
strings,  in

> order
> > > > to
> > > >feed back to the spec group
> > > >- took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the
CTS
> is
> > > >test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to
> assist
> > > > in
> > > >this goal
> > > >- contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
> > > >- provided support to the community with problems running the
CTS
> and
> > > >with insights into new Junit features
> > > >
> > > > Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
> > > > specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to 
the

> > > > project.
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Kelvin.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Pete


Looks good to me. +1. Welcome Andy.

Regards

Simon





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Adriano Crestani

+1 ; )

On 4/23/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


+1 from me

Paul

PS a recent discussion on qpid-dev indicates you need a good dose (3)
of IPMC votes to make this binding.

PPS (my +1 is IPMC binding)

On 4/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 from me. Welcome Andy!
>
> kelvin goodson wrote:
> > Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
> > 2006,
> > in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some
> > of you
> > may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from
> > the
> > lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...
> >
> >
> >   - been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
> >   - did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
> >   CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including
> > ensuring
> >   vendor independence.
> >   - has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
> >   between the CTS and the specification
> >   - developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
> >   function.
> >   - provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
> >   implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
> >   - has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
> >   - Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and
durations
> >   - developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without
Schema
> >   to SDO Type and Property
> >   - solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
> >   equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in
> > order to
> >   feed back to the spec group
> >   - took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
> >   test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to
> > assist in
> >   this goal
> >   - contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
> >   - provided support to the community with problems running the CTS
and
> >   with insights into new Junit features
> >
> > Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
> > specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the
> > project.
> >
> > Regards, Kelvin.
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Venkata Krishnan

+1 from me.

- Venkat

On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some of
you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from the
lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...


   - been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
   - did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
   CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including
ensuring
   vendor independence.
   - has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
   between the CTS and the specification
   - developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
   function.
   - provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
   implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
   - has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
   - Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and durations
   - developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without Schema
   to SDO Type and Property
   - solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
   equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in order
to
   feed back to the spec group
   - took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
   test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to assist
in
   this goal
   - contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
   - provided support to the community with problems running the CTS and
   with insights into new Junit features

Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the
project.

Regards, Kelvin.



Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino

+1 from me. Welcome Andy!

kelvin goodson wrote:
Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of 
2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some 
of you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from 
the

lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...


  - been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
  - did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
  CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including 
ensuring

  vendor independence.
  - has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
  between the CTS and the specification
  - developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
  function.
  - provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
  implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
  - has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
  - Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and durations
  - developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without Schema
  to SDO Type and Property
  - solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
  equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in 
order to

  feed back to the spec group
  - took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
  test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to 
assist in

  this goal
  - contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
  - provided support to the community with problems running the CTS and
  with insights into new Junit features

Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the 
project.


Regards, Kelvin.




--
Jean-Sebastien


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Paul Fremantle

+1 from me

Paul

PS a recent discussion on qpid-dev indicates you need a good dose (3)
of IPMC votes to make this binding.

PPS (my +1 is IPMC binding)

On 4/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

+1 from me. Welcome Andy!

kelvin goodson wrote:
> Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
> 2006,
> in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some
> of you
> may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from
> the
> lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...
>
>
>   - been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
>   - did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
>   CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including
> ensuring
>   vendor independence.
>   - has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
>   between the CTS and the specification
>   - developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
>   function.
>   - provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
>   implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
>   - has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
>   - Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and durations
>   - developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without Schema
>   to SDO Type and Property
>   - solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
>   equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in
> order to
>   feed back to the spec group
>   - took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
>   test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to
> assist in
>   this goal
>   - contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
>   - provided support to the community with problems running the CTS and
>   with insights into new Junit features
>
> Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
> specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the
> project.
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>


--
Jean-Sebastien


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Frank Budinsky
+1 from me.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/23/2007 04:38:57 AM:

> Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of 
2006,
> in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some of 
you
> may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from 
the
> lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...
> 
> 
>- been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
>- did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
>CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, 
> including ensuring
>vendor independence.
>- has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
>between the CTS and the specification
>- developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
>function.
>- provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
>implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
>- has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
>- Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and durations
>- developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without 
Schema
>to SDO Type and Property
>- solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
>equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in order 
to
>feed back to the spec group
>- took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
>test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to assist 
in
>this goal
>- contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
>- provided support to the community with problems running the CTS and
>with insights into new Junit features
> 
> Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
> specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the 
project.
> 
> Regards, Kelvin.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Simon Laws

On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


+1

On 23/04/07, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 from me
>
> On 4/23/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 Welcome Andy
> >
> > On 4/23/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 from me.
> > >
> > >...ant
> > >
> > > On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November
> of
> > > > 2006,
> > > > in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As
> some of
> > > > you
> > > > may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail
> from
> > > the
> > > > lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >- been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
> > > >- did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO
> Java
> > > >CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design,
> including
> > > > ensuring
> > > >vendor independence.
> > > >- has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
> > > >between the CTS and the specification
> > > >- developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
> > > >function.
> > > >- provided good insights to the required and permitted
behaviours
> of
> > > >implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
> > > >- has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
> > > >- Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and
> durations
> > > >- developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without
> > > Schema
> > > >to SDO Type and Property
> > > >- solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to
the
> > > >equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in
> order
> > > > to
> > > >feed back to the spec group
> > > >- took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the
CTS
> is
> > > >test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to
> assist
> > > > in
> > > >this goal
> > > >- contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
> > > >- provided support to the community with problems running the
CTS
> and
> > > >with insights into new Junit features
> > > >
> > > > Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
> > > > specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the
> > > > project.
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Kelvin.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Pete


Looks good to me. +1. Welcome Andy.

Regards

Simon


Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Pete Robbins

+1

On 23/04/07, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


+1 from me

On 4/23/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 Welcome Andy
>
> On 4/23/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> >...ant
> >
> > On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November
of
> > > 2006,
> > > in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As
some of
> > > you
> > > may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail
from
> > the
> > > lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...
> > >
> > >
> > >- been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
> > >- did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO
Java
> > >CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design,
including
> > > ensuring
> > >vendor independence.
> > >- has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
> > >between the CTS and the specification
> > >- developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
> > >function.
> > >- provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours
of
> > >implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
> > >- has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
> > >- Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and
durations
> > >- developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without
> > Schema
> > >to SDO Type and Property
> > >- solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
> > >equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in
order
> > > to
> > >feed back to the spec group
> > >- took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS
is
> > >test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to
assist
> > > in
> > >this goal
> > >- contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
> > >- provided support to the community with problems running the CTS
and
> > >with insights into new Junit features
> > >
> > > Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
> > > specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the
> > > project.
> > >
> > > Regards, Kelvin.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
Pete


Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Andrew Borley

+1 from me

On 4/23/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

+1 Welcome Andy

On 4/23/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 from me.
>
>...ant
>
> On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
> > 2006,
> > in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some of
> > you
> > may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from
> the
> > lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...
> >
> >
> >- been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
> >- did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
> >CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including
> > ensuring
> >vendor independence.
> >- has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
> >between the CTS and the specification
> >- developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
> >function.
> >- provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
> >implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
> >- has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
> >- Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and durations
> >- developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without
> Schema
> >to SDO Type and Property
> >- solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
> >equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in order
> > to
> >feed back to the spec group
> >- took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
> >test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to assist
> > in
> >this goal
> >- contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
> >- provided support to the community with problems running the CTS and
> >with insights into new Junit features
> >
> > Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
> > specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the
> > project.
> >
> > Regards, Kelvin.
> >
>



--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread Luciano Resende

+1 Welcome Andy

On 4/23/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


+1 from me.

   ...ant

On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
> 2006,
> in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some of
> you
> may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from
the
> lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...
>
>
>- been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
>- did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
>CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including
> ensuring
>vendor independence.
>- has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
>between the CTS and the specification
>- developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
>function.
>- provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
>implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
>- has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
>- Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and durations
>- developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without
Schema
>to SDO Type and Property
>- solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
>equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in order
> to
>feed back to the spec group
>- took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
>test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to assist
> in
>this goal
>- contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
>- provided support to the community with problems running the CTS and
>with insights into new Junit features
>
> Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
> specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the
> project.
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>





--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende


Re: [VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread ant elder

+1 from me.

  ...ant

On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of
2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some of
you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from the
lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...


   - been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
   - did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
   CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including
ensuring
   vendor independence.
   - has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
   between the CTS and the specification
   - developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
   function.
   - provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
   implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
   - has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
   - Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and durations
   - developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without Schema
   to SDO Type and Property
   - solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
   equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in order
to
   feed back to the spec group
   - took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
   test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to assist
in
   this goal
   - contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
   - provided support to the community with problems running the CTS and
   with insights into new Junit features

Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the
project.

Regards, Kelvin.



[VOTE] Andy Grove for Tuscany Committer

2007-04-23 Thread kelvin goodson

Andy has taken part in SDO Java and C++ discussions since November of 2006,
in particular in the area of the Community Test Suite (CTS).  As some of you
may not follow this closely, I've distilled quite a bit of detail from the
lists to show Andy's participation.  He ...


  - been active in creating and resolving numerous JIRAs
  - did some of the work of the initial drop of tests to the SDO Java
  CTS from Rogue Wave and in the CTS infrastructure design, including ensuring
  vendor independence.
  - has discovered and offered solutions to a number of anomalies
  between the CTS and the specification
  - developed and contributed tests for testing XML schema choice
  function.
  - provided good insights to the required and permitted behaviours of
  implementations when dealing with elements which are nillable
  - has taken part in discussions for an M1 release of the CTS
  - Initiated discussions on DataHelper formats wrt dates and durations
  - developed new test cases for spec section 9.10 -- XML without Schema
  to SDO Type and Property
  - solicited input from the Tuscany community with respect to the
  equivalence or otherwise of null URIs versus empty strings,  in order to
  feed back to the spec group
  - took a significant part in discussions of how to ensure the CTS is
  test harness agnostic, and provided patches to update tests to assist in
  this goal
  - contributed a set of tests for XSD complex types
  - provided support to the community with problems running the CTS and
  with insights into new Junit features

Aside from Tuscany, Andy has been active in the SDO Java and C++
specification efforts, and I think he will be a great asset to the project.

Regards, Kelvin.