Re: mysql4-server and tcpd.h and too many arguments to function
On 8/30/05, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Building mysqld failed on DragonFly with: > > mysqld.cc: In function `void* handle_connections_sockets(void*)': > /usr/include/tcpd.h:138: error: too many arguments to function `void > sock_host()' > mysqld.cc:3649: error: at this point in file > /usr/include/tcpd.h:76: error: too many arguments to function `int > hosts_access()' > mysqld.cc:3650: error: at this point in file > /usr/include/tcpd.h:131: error: too many arguments to function `char* > eval_client()' > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76076 > says header included with OS is broken > > Mysql bug is at http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=599 but it is closed. > > NetBSD (and OpenBSD) have modified the tcpd.h headers. > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/lib/libwrap/tcpd.h > > FreeBSD patches the mysql source to use its own header. > > I saw some old pkgsrc postings about this for various platforms. > > Should pkgsrc fix this? Should mysql fix this? Or should DragonFly be > fixed? IMHO, we should fix these outdated function declarations in our base system. Cheers, sephe > > Jeremy C. Reed > > p.s. I have over 2600 pkgsrc packages packaged for DragonFly. > -- Live Free or Die
mysql4-server and tcpd.h and too many arguments to function
Building mysqld failed on DragonFly with: mysqld.cc: In function `void* handle_connections_sockets(void*)': /usr/include/tcpd.h:138: error: too many arguments to function `void sock_host()' mysqld.cc:3649: error: at this point in file /usr/include/tcpd.h:76: error: too many arguments to function `int hosts_access()' mysqld.cc:3650: error: at this point in file /usr/include/tcpd.h:131: error: too many arguments to function `char* eval_client()' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76076 says header included with OS is broken Mysql bug is at http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=599 but it is closed. NetBSD (and OpenBSD) have modified the tcpd.h headers. http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/lib/libwrap/tcpd.h FreeBSD patches the mysql source to use its own header. I saw some old pkgsrc postings about this for various platforms. Should pkgsrc fix this? Should mysql fix this? Or should DragonFly be fixed? Jeremy C. Reed p.s. I have over 2600 pkgsrc packages packaged for DragonFly.
Re: user/group admin tools
: :Yeah, it is. However, Devon also mentioned we have lots of other :things, such as vipw and chsh etc etc. What's the take on adding :even more? : :-- : - Liam J. Foy From the dicussion so far it looks like we want these. We may not be able to immediately remove the old utilities, especially since I'm sure a lot of scripts use them, but the new ones have got a lot of things going for them and I think we want to shift focus to them. -Matt Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: user/group admin tools
On 02:30, Tue 30 Aug 05, Martin P. Hellwig wrote: > Liam J. Foy wrote: > > > > >Agreed. /me hates pw. I would just like these tools in, they're > >nicely documentated and easy to use in my opinion. > > > Yeah great, now I finally got a bit comfortable with pw they implement > something easier ;-) > Wait until it bites again! muhaha! -- - Liam J. Foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk
Re: user/group admin tools
On Mon, August 29, 2005 6:12 pm, Liam J. Foy said: > I have ported user* and group* tools from NetBSD. In my personal > experience and opinion I find them MUCH easier to use when > administrating users. They also contain functions which we > currently would have to manually edit /etc/master.passwd for, such > as the ability to force users to change their password at next > login and to 'lock' accounts(these options have been added to NetBSD > already, but you'll have to check the CVS logs to see them). I have > ported the latest code. > > What's the general opinion on this? Would you like them put into > DragonFly BSD? Anything originally based on a utility called "addnerd" gets my vote. :)
Re: user/group admin tools
Liam J. Foy wrote: Agreed. /me hates pw. I would just like these tools in, they're nicely documentated and easy to use in my opinion. Yeah great, now I finally got a bit comfortable with pw they implement something easier ;-) -- mph
pam_echo & pam_exec included?
Hi all, While browsing for handy pam stuff, I got my eye on pam_echo & pam_exec, it seems that these are not available in DF or am I looking not hard enough? I really could use these for my authtoken syncer I'm planning to build in python. -- mph
Re: user/group admin tools
On 17:03, Mon 29 Aug 05, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:55:35AM +0100, Liam J. Foy wrote: > > On 15:50, Mon 29 Aug 05, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > > > > Just kidding. The utilities look fine. I particularly like the > > > idea of the -D option, which is to have the program adjust the > > > defaults via the config file based on supplied options rather then > > > making the admin edit the config file. > > > > > > -Matt > > > Matthew Dillon > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Yeah, it is. However, Devon also mentioned we have lots of other > > things, such as vipw and chsh etc etc. What's the take on adding > > even more? > > > > -- > > - Liam J. Foy > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk > > The point of using tools named like this is that they're in NetBSD, > OpenBSD, Linux and Solaris. > Agreed. /me hates pw. I would just like these tools in, they're nicely documentated and easy to use in my opinion. -- - Liam J. Foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk
Re: user/group admin tools
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:03:14PM -0700, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > The point of using tools named like this is that they're in NetBSD, > OpenBSD, Linux and Solaris. > > --Devon Eh, and the purpose of removing pw in favor of these tools is that pw was made in FreeBSD to emulate their functionality. --Devon
Re: user/group admin tools
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:55:35AM +0100, Liam J. Foy wrote: > On 15:50, Mon 29 Aug 05, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > > Just kidding. The utilities look fine. I particularly like the > > idea of the -D option, which is to have the program adjust the > > defaults via the config file based on supplied options rather then > > making the admin edit the config file. > > > > -Matt > > Matthew Dillon > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Yeah, it is. However, Devon also mentioned we have lots of other > things, such as vipw and chsh etc etc. What's the take on adding > even more? > > -- > - Liam J. Foy > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk The point of using tools named like this is that they're in NetBSD, OpenBSD, Linux and Solaris. --Devon
Re: user/group admin tools
On 15:50, Mon 29 Aug 05, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :... > : > :http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?useradd++NetBSD-current > : > :Also check userdel, usermod, groupadd and groupdel etc etc. > :Remember they also contain two other options which I wrote for > :NetBSD to temporary lock users and to force a new password to be > :given at next login(usermod, useradd). > : > :Cheers > :-- > : - Liam J. Foy > > What, no 'interactive' option so a tired sysad can be hand-held > through? =) > > Just kidding. The utilities look fine. I particularly like the > idea of the -D option, which is to have the program adjust the > defaults via the config file based on supplied options rather then > making the admin edit the config file. > > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Yeah, it is. However, Devon also mentioned we have lots of other things, such as vipw and chsh etc etc. What's the take on adding even more? -- - Liam J. Foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk
Re: user/group admin tools
:... : :http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?useradd++NetBSD-current : :Also check userdel, usermod, groupadd and groupdel etc etc. :Remember they also contain two other options which I wrote for :NetBSD to temporary lock users and to force a new password to be :given at next login(usermod, useradd). : :Cheers :-- : - Liam J. Foy What, no 'interactive' option so a tired sysad can be hand-held through? Just kidding. The utilities look fine. I particularly like the idea of the -D option, which is to have the program adjust the defaults via the config file based on supplied options rather then making the admin edit the config file. -Matt Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: user/group admin tools
On 00:23, Tue 30 Aug 05, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > Liam J. Foy wrote: > >Comments/Productive criticism welcome, rants/flames, no =). > > show the diff so we can see what they are like :) > > cheers > simon > Instead of show the huge diff, why not just check: http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?useradd++NetBSD-current Also check userdel, usermod, groupadd and groupdel etc etc. Remember they also contain two other options which I wrote for NetBSD to temporary lock users and to force a new password to be given at next login(usermod, useradd). Cheers -- - Liam J. Foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk
Re: user/group admin tools
Liam J. Foy wrote: Comments/Productive criticism welcome, rants/flames, no =). show the diff so we can see what they are like :) cheers simon -- Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ASCII Ribbon /"\ Work - Mac +++ space for low $$$ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ / Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \ Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
user/group admin tools
I have ported user* and group* tools from NetBSD. In my personal experience and opinion I find them MUCH easier to use when administrating users. They also contain functions which we currently would have to manually edit /etc/master.passwd for, such as the ability to force users to change their password at next login and to 'lock' accounts(these options have been added to NetBSD already, but you'll have to check the CVS logs to see them). I have ported the latest code. What's the general opinion on this? Would you like them put into DragonFly BSD? Comments/Productive criticism welcome, rants/flames, no =). -- - Liam J. Foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk
Want to run Windowsapplications on BSD?
If you want to get Wine CrossoverOffice working on *BSD If you want to get your favourite Hard-/Software working on *BSD If you want to show software/hardwarecompanys, that you are there and use *BSD then please sign here http://www.bsdnexus.com/petition.asp Please sign also if you don't need Corssover, because it's time to show them, taht there are BSD-Users, who need supported Soft- or Hardware. -- Sorry for bad English, reezer
Nvidia driver
does anyone know if the Nvidia driver for freebsd works with Dragonfly? I am using 1.2.1 release. Thanks for the help David
