Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-30 Thread nilo.de.roock

I am going ahead with Groovy. ( It's seem to be a love / hate thing with
Groovy, but that only proves that it has a strong 'personality' ).  I'll
keep the list posted.

( 
Off-topic: this is a blog article about Groovy and Hibernate: 

http://jroller.com/page/mohanradhakrishnan?entry=prototyping_with_groovy
)
-nilo


n8han wrote:
> 
> I'm interested in this too, btw. I was looking into Groovy before but 
> stopped when it appeared that 1.0 wouldn't support annotations well 
> enough for Hibernate Annotations. Then I thought about stealing Grails' 
> ActiveRecord clone, but I don't really like ActiveRecord any better than 
> HA so I decided to wait until Groovy catches up with Java 5. (For me, 
> this is all about not writing, generating, or seeing "getters" and 
> "setters" in my "beans.") So keep us posted please.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> 
> nilo.de.roock wrote:
>> I never heard of https://pnuts.dev.java.net/ before, I looked briefly at
>> it.
>> It's amazing how many excellent stuff is around, once you start looking
>> for
>> it. It's fun to talk about software, it's part of the ego, we all have
>> our
>> own preferences. I like Wicket a lot, we agree on that I suppose. I also
>> like Windows, Opera, Dreamweaver, NetBeans and Groovy ( and Java most of
>> all
>> of course ). Things you probably don't like except for Java. I like
>> Groovy
>> and Wicket a lot. That explains the idea.
>> 
>> But this remains irrelevant as long as I haven't got any code. First
>> things
>> first.
>> -nilo
> 
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8716576
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-30 Thread Nathan Hamblen
I'm interested in this too, btw. I was looking into Groovy before but 
stopped when it appeared that 1.0 wouldn't support annotations well 
enough for Hibernate Annotations. Then I thought about stealing Grails' 
ActiveRecord clone, but I don't really like ActiveRecord any better than 
HA so I decided to wait until Groovy catches up with Java 5. (For me, 
this is all about not writing, generating, or seeing "getters" and 
"setters" in my "beans.") So keep us posted please.

Nathan


nilo.de.roock wrote:
> I never heard of https://pnuts.dev.java.net/ before, I looked briefly at it.
> It's amazing how many excellent stuff is around, once you start looking for
> it. It's fun to talk about software, it's part of the ego, we all have our
> own preferences. I like Wicket a lot, we agree on that I suppose. I also
> like Windows, Opera, Dreamweaver, NetBeans and Groovy ( and Java most of all
> of course ). Things you probably don't like except for Java. I like Groovy
> and Wicket a lot. That explains the idea.
> 
> But this remains irrelevant as long as I haven't got any code. First things
> first.
> -nilo


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-29 Thread nilo.de.roock

I never heard of https://pnuts.dev.java.net/ before, I looked briefly at it.
It's amazing how many excellent stuff is around, once you start looking for
it. It's fun to talk about software, it's part of the ego, we all have our
own preferences. I like Wicket a lot, we agree on that I suppose. I also
like Windows, Opera, Dreamweaver, NetBeans and Groovy ( and Java most of all
of course ). Things you probably don't like except for Java. I like Groovy
and Wicket a lot. That explains the idea.

But this remains irrelevant as long as I haven't got any code. First things
first.
-nilo



Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> 
> On 1/29/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> There are three examples Page1.java / Page1.html, Page2.java / etc.
>> As far as I can see they are exactly the same.
>> Was this sufficient to demo / test the integration?
> 
> In this case it was, as it proves that the Groovy scrips result in
> pages/ components from where it just works like the rest of Wicket. So
> case was made, the Sky is the limit. Note that we weren't introducing
> some new fancy DSL/ framework on top of Wicket, but merely let you use
> Groovy to define your components and pages rather than Java.
> 
>> It would be nice to be able to develop Wicket webapps with Groovy ( or
>> JRuby, or whatever makes a developer happy and thus productive )
> 
> I don't know about that. We made this integration project to show that
> we could, but obviously it is not a center technology or otherwise you
> would have found this in core or as a core project.
> 
> One of the advantages you'll get from working with Wicket is that you
> can rely on strong typing a lot - and this is different from a lot of
> competing frameworks - with the all advantages (and sometimes
> disadvantages) that come with that. Of course, the fact that *we*
> think Java is better for Wicket than Groovy is doesn't mean that is
> for everybody.
> 
>> If I manage to get a thorough understanding of what it takes to integrate
>> Wicket and Groovy I can maintain the Groovy / Wicket integration for the
>> Wicket team. I am thinking of contributing a demo site in Groovy / Wicket
>> /
>> Databinder including a testset and tutorial. It won't be a trivial app so
>> I
>> am thinking in months rather than weeks before it's in a releasable
>> state.
>> That's the best way of testing the integration, I suppose.
> 
> Sure, mail me your sourceforge account and I'll be happy to grant you
> commit rights. I don't think the example needs to be more extensive to
> show that the trick works, but I can definitively see possibilities to
> extend the Groovy integration with some Groovy extensions and
> utilities to facilitate the kind of rapid development you're looking
> for if you decide to use Groovy.
> 
> Just on the side note: I don't think I will ever be a big Groovy fan.
> It seems that the project made a lot of progress in the last two
> years, but I wonder if it really ever outgrew it's shaky foundations.
> My favorite scripting language for Java has always been PNuts
> (https://pnuts.dev.java.net/). It's simple to integrate, clean, super
> fast and extensible. So if you're thinking about integrating *some*
> scripting language, you might consider the alternatives (JRuby and
> Jython being other options to look into). Just my 2c.
> 
> Eelco
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8695744
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-29 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 1/29/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are three examples Page1.java / Page1.html, Page2.java / etc.
> As far as I can see they are exactly the same.
> Was this sufficient to demo / test the integration?

In this case it was, as it proves that the Groovy scrips result in
pages/ components from where it just works like the rest of Wicket. So
case was made, the Sky is the limit. Note that we weren't introducing
some new fancy DSL/ framework on top of Wicket, but merely let you use
Groovy to define your components and pages rather than Java.

> It would be nice to be able to develop Wicket webapps with Groovy ( or
> JRuby, or whatever makes a developer happy and thus productive )

I don't know about that. We made this integration project to show that
we could, but obviously it is not a center technology or otherwise you
would have found this in core or as a core project.

One of the advantages you'll get from working with Wicket is that you
can rely on strong typing a lot - and this is different from a lot of
competing frameworks - with the all advantages (and sometimes
disadvantages) that come with that. Of course, the fact that *we*
think Java is better for Wicket than Groovy is doesn't mean that is
for everybody.

> If I manage to get a thorough understanding of what it takes to integrate
> Wicket and Groovy I can maintain the Groovy / Wicket integration for the
> Wicket team. I am thinking of contributing a demo site in Groovy / Wicket /
> Databinder including a testset and tutorial. It won't be a trivial app so I
> am thinking in months rather than weeks before it's in a releasable state.
> That's the best way of testing the integration, I suppose.

Sure, mail me your sourceforge account and I'll be happy to grant you
commit rights. I don't think the example needs to be more extensive to
show that the trick works, but I can definitively see possibilities to
extend the Groovy integration with some Groovy extensions and
utilities to facilitate the kind of rapid development you're looking
for if you decide to use Groovy.

Just on the side note: I don't think I will ever be a big Groovy fan.
It seems that the project made a lot of progress in the last two
years, but I wonder if it really ever outgrew it's shaky foundations.
My favorite scripting language for Java has always been PNuts
(https://pnuts.dev.java.net/). It's simple to integrate, clean, super
fast and extensible. So if you're thinking about integrating *some*
scripting language, you might consider the alternatives (JRuby and
Jython being other options to look into). Just my 2c.

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-29 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Why shouldn't they be enough? Do you have any indication that it
isn't? What doesn't work?

Martijn

On 1/29/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are three examples Page1.java / Page1.html, Page2.java / etc.
> As far as I can see they are exactly the same.
> Was this sufficient to demo / test the integration?
>
> It would be nice to be able to develop Wicket webapps with Groovy ( or
> JRuby, or whatever makes a developer happy and thus productive )
>
> If I manage to get a thorough understanding of what it takes to integrate
> Wicket and Groovy I can maintain the Groovy / Wicket integration for the
> Wicket team. I am thinking of contributing a demo site in Groovy / Wicket /
> Databinder including a testset and tutorial. It won't be a trivial app so I
> am thinking in months rather than weeks before it's in a releasable state.
> That's the best way of testing the integration, I suppose.
>
> What do you think?
>
> -nilo
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >
> >> There are indeed some examples, they are at...
> >> path_to/wicket/contrib/examples/groovy/
> >
> > Oh yeah. I thought it had a separate examples project, but the
> > examples are actually in the same project
> > (https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3/wicket-contrib-groovy/src/examples).
> >
> > We can migrate those to the wicket-contrib-examples project as well.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> > your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > _______________
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8688280
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-29 Thread nilo.de.roock

There are three examples Page1.java / Page1.html, Page2.java / etc.
As far as I can see they are exactly the same. 
Was this sufficient to demo / test the integration?

It would be nice to be able to develop Wicket webapps with Groovy ( or
JRuby, or whatever makes a developer happy and thus productive )

If I manage to get a thorough understanding of what it takes to integrate
Wicket and Groovy I can maintain the Groovy / Wicket integration for the
Wicket team. I am thinking of contributing a demo site in Groovy / Wicket /
Databinder including a testset and tutorial. It won't be a trivial app so I
am thinking in months rather than weeks before it's in a releasable state.
That's the best way of testing the integration, I suppose.

What do you think?

-nilo


Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> 
>> There are indeed some examples, they are at...
>> path_to/wicket/contrib/examples/groovy/
> 
> Oh yeah. I thought it had a separate examples project, but the
> examples are actually in the same project
> (https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3/wicket-contrib-groovy/src/examples).
> 
> We can migrate those to the wicket-contrib-examples project as well.
> 
> Eelco
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8688280
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-28 Thread Eelco Hillenius
> There are indeed some examples, they are at...
> path_to/wicket/contrib/examples/groovy/

Oh yeah. I thought it had a separate examples project, but the
examples are actually in the same project
(https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.3/wicket-contrib-groovy/src/examples).

We can migrate those to the wicket-contrib-examples project as well.

Eelco

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-28 Thread nilo.de.roock

You were going to say "Why does everything need tons of examples?", right?

There are indeed some examples, they are at...
path_to/wicket/contrib/examples/groovy/

Thanks!


Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> 
> More wasnt need to integrate Groovy. Why does everything need tons of
> classes?
> I know for sure that an example existed in one of the example projects.
> 
> Juergen
> 
> On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is it correct that the groovy integration contribution consists of
>> - GroovyClassResolver.java
>> - GroovyWarClassLoader.java ?
>> You think it still works... no testset, I suppose. What else is there
>> besides some code?
>> Thanks
>> - nilo
>>
>>
>> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>> >
>> > I think it should still work. You can report bugs if you find them
>> > (preferably fixing them if you can). If there is interest (you) we can
>> > at least take a quick look in case problems arise, but there is a fair
>> > chance this integration project still just works.
>> >
>> > Eelco
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I won't mind investing time to acquire in-depth Wicket source
>> knowledge,
>> >> but
>> >> I am not sure yet if I feel the same way about Groovy. I 'll have a
>> look
>> >> at
>> >> the Wicket-Groovy integration source over the weekend first. I'll get
>> >> back
>> >> on this.
>> >> - nilo de roock
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Nobody is maintaining it. So you can step up and integrate Groovy
>> 1.0
>> >> > into wicket 1.2, 1.x or 2.x (or any combination of that).
>> >> >
>> >> > Grooyv interest is pretty low here, but might catch up if someone
>> goes
>> >> > the extra mile to revitalize the integration.
>> >> >
>> >> > Martijn
>> >> >
>> >> > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting
>> >> language )
>> >> >> with Wicket but I just read...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> " ... End of line. until someone actually uses it, this project
>> will
>> >> not
>> >> >> be
>> >> >> supported any further. It is here to proove that it can be done. If
>> >> you
>> >> >> want
>> >> >> to use and support it, send an email about it to one of the mailing
>> >> >> lists.
>> >> >> ..."
>> >> >>
>> >> >> on the Wicket-stuff site.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So Groovy is no longer supported? ( Yes, I can read..., but ) just
>> >> want
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> make sure. I did a Groovy project and really liked the language.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -nilo de roock
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8648966
>> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> -
>> >> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> >> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>> >> share
>> >> >> your
>> >> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn
>> cash
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> >> >> ___
>> >> >> Wicket-user mailing list
>> >> >> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Vote for Wicke

Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-28 Thread nilo.de.roock

( I certainly did not imply that everything needs tons of classes, but as you
well know Java is a rather verbose language. I don't imply anything in
e-mail. If I want to say something I write it explicitly. )

Back to Wicket / Groovy. I still have to find my way around here, I suppose,
can you help me finding the Groovy integration example project?

- nilo


Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> 
> More wasnt need to integrate Groovy. Why does everything need tons of
> classes?
> I know for sure that an example existed in one of the example projects.
> 
> Juergen
> 
> On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is it correct that the groovy integration contribution consists of
>> - GroovyClassResolver.java
>> - GroovyWarClassLoader.java ?
>> You think it still works... no testset, I suppose. What else is there
>> besides some code?
>> Thanks
>> - nilo
>>
>>
>> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>> >
>> > I think it should still work. You can report bugs if you find them
>> > (preferably fixing them if you can). If there is interest (you) we can
>> > at least take a quick look in case problems arise, but there is a fair
>> > chance this integration project still just works.
>> >
>> > Eelco
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I won't mind investing time to acquire in-depth Wicket source
>> knowledge,
>> >> but
>> >> I am not sure yet if I feel the same way about Groovy. I 'll have a
>> look
>> >> at
>> >> the Wicket-Groovy integration source over the weekend first. I'll get
>> >> back
>> >> on this.
>> >> - nilo de roock
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Nobody is maintaining it. So you can step up and integrate Groovy
>> 1.0
>> >> > into wicket 1.2, 1.x or 2.x (or any combination of that).
>> >> >
>> >> > Grooyv interest is pretty low here, but might catch up if someone
>> goes
>> >> > the extra mile to revitalize the integration.
>> >> >
>> >> > Martijn
>> >> >
>> >> > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting
>> >> language )
>> >> >> with Wicket but I just read...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> " ... End of line. until someone actually uses it, this project
>> will
>> >> not
>> >> >> be
>> >> >> supported any further. It is here to proove that it can be done. If
>> >> you
>> >> >> want
>> >> >> to use and support it, send an email about it to one of the mailing
>> >> >> lists.
>> >> >> ..."
>> >> >>
>> >> >> on the Wicket-stuff site.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So Groovy is no longer supported? ( Yes, I can read..., but ) just
>> >> want
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> make sure. I did a Groovy project and really liked the language.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -nilo de roock
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8648966
>> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> -
>> >> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> >> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>> >> share
>> >> >> your
>> >> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn
>> cash
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> >> >> ___
>> >> >> Wicket-user mailing list
>> >> >> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-u

Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-26 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Yeah, it has a separate examples project.

Eelco


On 1/26/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More wasnt need to integrate Groovy. Why does everything need tons of classes?
> I know for sure that an example existed in one of the example projects.
>
> Juergen
>
> On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is it correct that the groovy integration contribution consists of
> > - GroovyClassResolver.java
> > - GroovyWarClassLoader.java ?
> > You think it still works... no testset, I suppose. What else is there
> > besides some code?
> > Thanks
> > - nilo
> >
> >
> > Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > >
> > > I think it should still work. You can report bugs if you find them
> > > (preferably fixing them if you can). If there is interest (you) we can
> > > at least take a quick look in case problems arise, but there is a fair
> > > chance this integration project still just works.
> > >
> > > Eelco
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I won't mind investing time to acquire in-depth Wicket source knowledge,
> > >> but
> > >> I am not sure yet if I feel the same way about Groovy. I 'll have a look
> > >> at
> > >> the Wicket-Groovy integration source over the weekend first. I'll get
> > >> back
> > >> on this.
> > >> - nilo de roock
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Nobody is maintaining it. So you can step up and integrate Groovy 1.0
> > >> > into wicket 1.2, 1.x or 2.x (or any combination of that).
> > >> >
> > >> > Grooyv interest is pretty low here, but might catch up if someone goes
> > >> > the extra mile to revitalize the integration.
> > >> >
> > >> > Martijn
> > >> >
> > >> > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting
> > >> language )
> > >> >> with Wicket but I just read...
> > >> >>
> > >> >> " ... End of line. until someone actually uses it, this project will
> > >> not
> > >> >> be
> > >> >> supported any further. It is here to proove that it can be done. If
> > >> you
> > >> >> want
> > >> >> to use and support it, send an email about it to one of the mailing
> > >> >> lists.
> > >> >> ..."
> > >> >>
> > >> >> on the Wicket-stuff site.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> So Groovy is no longer supported? ( Yes, I can read..., but ) just
> > >> want
> > >> >> to
> > >> >> make sure. I did a Groovy project and really liked the language.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -nilo de roock
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> View this message in context:
> > >> >>
> > >> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8648966
> > >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> -
> > >> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > >> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> > >> share
> > >> >> your
> > >> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > >> >>
> > >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > >> >> ___
> > >> >> Wicket-user mailing list
> > >> >> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Vote for Wicket at the
> > >> > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > >> > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-

Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg

On 1/26/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Why does everything need tons of classes?



:)

-igor
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-26 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
More wasnt need to integrate Groovy. Why does everything need tons of classes?
I know for sure that an example existed in one of the example projects.

Juergen

On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it correct that the groovy integration contribution consists of
> - GroovyClassResolver.java
> - GroovyWarClassLoader.java ?
> You think it still works... no testset, I suppose. What else is there
> besides some code?
> Thanks
> - nilo
>
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> >
> > I think it should still work. You can report bugs if you find them
> > (preferably fixing them if you can). If there is interest (you) we can
> > at least take a quick look in case problems arise, but there is a fair
> > chance this integration project still just works.
> >
> > Eelco
> >
> >
> > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I won't mind investing time to acquire in-depth Wicket source knowledge,
> >> but
> >> I am not sure yet if I feel the same way about Groovy. I 'll have a look
> >> at
> >> the Wicket-Groovy integration source over the weekend first. I'll get
> >> back
> >> on this.
> >> - nilo de roock
> >>
> >>
> >> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Nobody is maintaining it. So you can step up and integrate Groovy 1.0
> >> > into wicket 1.2, 1.x or 2.x (or any combination of that).
> >> >
> >> > Grooyv interest is pretty low here, but might catch up if someone goes
> >> > the extra mile to revitalize the integration.
> >> >
> >> > Martijn
> >> >
> >> > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting
> >> language )
> >> >> with Wicket but I just read...
> >> >>
> >> >> " ... End of line. until someone actually uses it, this project will
> >> not
> >> >> be
> >> >> supported any further. It is here to proove that it can be done. If
> >> you
> >> >> want
> >> >> to use and support it, send an email about it to one of the mailing
> >> >> lists.
> >> >> ..."
> >> >>
> >> >> on the Wicket-stuff site.
> >> >>
> >> >> So Groovy is no longer supported? ( Yes, I can read..., but ) just
> >> want
> >> >> to
> >> >> make sure. I did a Groovy project and really liked the language.
> >> >>
> >> >> -nilo de roock
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8648966
> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> -
> >> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> >> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
> >> share
> >> >> your
> >> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >> >>
> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >> >> ___
> >> >> Wicket-user mailing list
> >> >> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Vote for Wicket at the
> >> > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> >> > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> >> > http://wicketframework.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> -
> >> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> >> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> >> > your
> >> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >> >
> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >&

Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-26 Thread nilo.de.roock

Is it correct that the groovy integration contribution consists of 
- GroovyClassResolver.java
- GroovyWarClassLoader.java ?
You think it still works... no testset, I suppose. What else is there
besides some code?
Thanks
- nilo


Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> 
> I think it should still work. You can report bugs if you find them
> (preferably fixing them if you can). If there is interest (you) we can
> at least take a quick look in case problems arise, but there is a fair
> chance this integration project still just works.
> 
> Eelco
> 
> 
> On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I won't mind investing time to acquire in-depth Wicket source knowledge,
>> but
>> I am not sure yet if I feel the same way about Groovy. I 'll have a look
>> at
>> the Wicket-Groovy integration source over the weekend first. I'll get
>> back
>> on this.
>> - nilo de roock
>>
>>
>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> >
>> > Nobody is maintaining it. So you can step up and integrate Groovy 1.0
>> > into wicket 1.2, 1.x or 2.x (or any combination of that).
>> >
>> > Grooyv interest is pretty low here, but might catch up if someone goes
>> > the extra mile to revitalize the integration.
>> >
>> > Martijn
>> >
>> > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting
>> language )
>> >> with Wicket but I just read...
>> >>
>> >> " ... End of line. until someone actually uses it, this project will
>> not
>> >> be
>> >> supported any further. It is here to proove that it can be done. If
>> you
>> >> want
>> >> to use and support it, send an email about it to one of the mailing
>> >> lists.
>> >> ..."
>> >>
>> >> on the Wicket-stuff site.
>> >>
>> >> So Groovy is no longer supported? ( Yes, I can read..., but ) just
>> want
>> >> to
>> >> make sure. I did a Groovy project and really liked the language.
>> >>
>> >> -nilo de roock
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8648966
>> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> -
>> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>> share
>> >> your
>> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>> >>
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> >> ___
>> >> Wicket-user mailing list
>> >> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Vote for Wicket at the
>> > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
>> > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
>> > http://wicketframework.org
>> >
>> >
>> -
>> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
>> > your
>> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>> >
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> > ___
>> > Wicket-user mailing list
>> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8650014
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> -
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
>

Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-26 Thread Eelco Hillenius
I think it should still work. You can report bugs if you find them
(preferably fixing them if you can). If there is interest (you) we can
at least take a quick look in case problems arise, but there is a fair
chance this integration project still just works.

Eelco


On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I won't mind investing time to acquire in-depth Wicket source knowledge, but
> I am not sure yet if I feel the same way about Groovy. I 'll have a look at
> the Wicket-Groovy integration source over the weekend first. I'll get back
> on this.
> - nilo de roock
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >
> > Nobody is maintaining it. So you can step up and integrate Groovy 1.0
> > into wicket 1.2, 1.x or 2.x (or any combination of that).
> >
> > Grooyv interest is pretty low here, but might catch up if someone goes
> > the extra mile to revitalize the integration.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting language )
> >> with Wicket but I just read...
> >>
> >> " ... End of line. until someone actually uses it, this project will not
> >> be
> >> supported any further. It is here to proove that it can be done. If you
> >> want
> >> to use and support it, send an email about it to one of the mailing
> >> lists.
> >> ..."
> >>
> >> on the Wicket-stuff site.
> >>
> >> So Groovy is no longer supported? ( Yes, I can read..., but ) just want
> >> to
> >> make sure. I did a Groovy project and really liked the language.
> >>
> >> -nilo de roock
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8648966
> >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> >> your
> >> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> >> ___
> >> Wicket-user mailing list
> >> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Vote for Wicket at the
> > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> > http://wicketframework.org
> >
> > -
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> > your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > ___
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8650014
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-26 Thread nilo.de.roock

I won't mind investing time to acquire in-depth Wicket source knowledge, but
I am not sure yet if I feel the same way about Groovy. I 'll have a look at
the Wicket-Groovy integration source over the weekend first. I'll get back
on this.
- nilo de roock


Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> 
> Nobody is maintaining it. So you can step up and integrate Groovy 1.0
> into wicket 1.2, 1.x or 2.x (or any combination of that).
> 
> Grooyv interest is pretty low here, but might catch up if someone goes
> the extra mile to revitalize the integration.
> 
> Martijn
> 
> On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting language )
>> with Wicket but I just read...
>>
>> " ... End of line. until someone actually uses it, this project will not
>> be
>> supported any further. It is here to proove that it can be done. If you
>> want
>> to use and support it, send an email about it to one of the mailing
>> lists.
>> ..."
>>
>> on the Wicket-stuff site.
>>
>> So Groovy is no longer supported? ( Yes, I can read..., but ) just want
>> to
>> make sure. I did a Groovy project and really liked the language.
>>
>> -nilo de roock
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8648966
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> -
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
>> your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> ___
>> Wicket-user mailing list
>> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Vote for Wicket at the
> http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8650014
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-26 Thread Erik van Oosten
Hi Nilo,

I tried Wicket with JRuby a week ago. Unfortunately JRuby's (0.9.2) Java 
integration is not yet powerful enough to make this viable (actually, it 
simply broken). Perhaps in a couple of months I'll try again.

Regards,
 Erik.


nilo.de.roock wrote:
> I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting language )
> with Wicket but I just read...
>   

-- 
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-26 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Nobody is maintaining it. So you can step up and integrate Groovy 1.0
into wicket 1.2, 1.x or 2.x (or any combination of that).

Grooyv interest is pretty low here, but might catch up if someone goes
the extra mile to revitalize the integration.

Martijn

On 1/26/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting language )
> with Wicket but I just read...
>
> " ... End of line. until someone actually uses it, this project will not be
> supported any further. It is here to proove that it can be done. If you want
> to use and support it, send an email about it to one of the mailing lists.
> ..."
>
> on the Wicket-stuff site.
>
> So Groovy is no longer supported? ( Yes, I can read..., but ) just want to
> make sure. I did a Groovy project and really liked the language.
>
> -nilo de roock
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8648966
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


[Wicket-user] Groovy integration? Scripting languages

2007-01-26 Thread nilo.de.roock

I was hoping to be able to use Groovy ( or any other scripting language )
with Wicket but I just read...

" ... End of line. until someone actually uses it, this project will not be
supported any further. It is here to proove that it can be done. If you want
to use and support it, send an email about it to one of the mailing lists.
..." 

on the Wicket-stuff site.

So Groovy is no longer supported? ( Yes, I can read..., but ) just want to
make sure. I did a Groovy project and really liked the language.

-nilo de roock


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-user--Groovy-integration--Scripting-languages-tf3121629.html#a8648966
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user