Re: [14/14] gdiplus: Reimplement GdipDrawPath.
> Well, GdipWidenPath is actually good enough for the things I've tested > so far, so it's basically working. What are the possible problems with > it you are aware of? It doesn't implement dashed lines and most line cap styles. I think it also mishandles pen->width == 0. It doesn't have to be perfect, but it should at least have the features we implement now.
Re: [14/14] gdiplus: Reimplement GdipDrawPath.
Vincent Povirk wrote: > > Please don't apply this [14/14] patch, it causes a test failure. I'm sending > > it to show how this is going to look like eventually. > > Yeah, GdipWidenPath isn't good enough for this yet. But I agree this > is the way to go, and the rest of the series looks good. Well, GdipWidenPath is actually good enough for the things I've tested so far, so it's basically working. What are the possible problems with it you are aware of? -- Dmitry.
Re: [14/14] gdiplus: Reimplement GdipDrawPath.
> Please don't apply this [14/14] patch, it causes a test failure. I'm sending > it to show how this is going to look like eventually. Yeah, GdipWidenPath isn't good enough for this yet. But I agree this is the way to go, and the rest of the series looks good.
