Re: [XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
I can confirm the following behaviour with XeteX: 2 identical *truetype* fonts (one in texmf tree and the other in system folder) causes problems with rendering. However, 2 identical *opentype* fonts seems to work fine without any rendering problems. Basically, I had the file originally opentype which while fiddling around I converted to truetype copied it to both texmf tree and system folder (/usr/share/fonts/ under ubuntu linux) and I got the rendering problem. Another issue with *truetype* font is that I get isolated letters instead of the correctly connected ones (this is true also for the Scheherazade font). I must be missing something when I say? \font\test="Scheherazade" \test .. Thanks, AKAL On 27 June 2010 10:14, Abdulrahman Al-Abdusalalm wrote: > Thanks all for the helpful replies. Previously I had a pfb version under > TEXMFHOME dir > after removing it the problem seems to persist. I generated the pfb version > so I can test > the font with plain pdfTeX engine. Do I have to remove all the other tfm, > enc, map files also? > I will give it a try ... > > Kindest Regards, > Abdulrahman > > > On 27 June 2010 06:58, Jonathan Kew wrote: > >> On 26 Jun 2010, at 16:46, Khaled Hosny wrote: >> >> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:04:05PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.eduwrote: >> >> >> >>> My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed >> somewhere. >> >>> Having to different version of the same font installed is known to >> cause >> >>> this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is enough >> >>> to solve this issue. >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Khaled >> >> >> >> "an old version" should not be understood literally. Two identical >> copies >> >> of the exactly same font: one, say, in the system fonts directory, and >> >> another one in the TeX distribution tree -- will cause this behavior. >> >> I have not seen any evidence that this is so, and would be very surprised >> if this happens. >> >> >> This >> >> is a very frustrating and well attested bug in XeTeX (which for some >> >> reason has been ignored so far by the XeTeX creator and maintainer). >> > >> > Theoretically, if my previous "analysis" of this issue was correct, two >> > identical copies should not cause any problems, since both will have >> > the same glyph IDs. I should have said a different instead of old copy, >> > though. >> >> Indeed. The problem may occur if two *different* versions of the "same" >> font (i.e., with the same font names, but different versions or different >> formats -- e.g., type 1 vs truetype) are installed. As I believe I have >> explained previously, it's possible that xetex will find one font during >> formatting, but then xdvipdfmx finds the other at PDF generation time, and >> the glyph IDs don't match. >> >> Obviously, it would be better if the two programs were guaranteed to >> always find the same font for a given name, but ensuring this for all >> configurations and environments may not be as simple as it sounds. For now, >> at least, the *strong* recommendation is to have only ONE version of any >> given font installed. >> >> JK >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: >> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex >> > > > > -- Abdulrahman AAl Abdulsalam Assistant Lecturer - IT Department College of Applied Science P.O. Box 699 Nizwa, 611 Oman -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
Thanks all for the helpful replies. Previously I had a pfb version under TEXMFHOME dir after removing it the problem seems to persist. I generated the pfb version so I can test the font with plain pdfTeX engine. Do I have to remove all the other tfm, enc, map files also? I will give it a try ... Kindest Regards, Abdulrahman On 27 June 2010 06:58, Jonathan Kew wrote: > On 26 Jun 2010, at 16:46, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:04:05PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.eduwrote: > >> > >>> My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed > somewhere. > >>> Having to different version of the same font installed is known to > cause > >>> this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is enough > >>> to solve this issue. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Khaled > >> > >> "an old version" should not be understood literally. Two identical > copies > >> of the exactly same font: one, say, in the system fonts directory, and > >> another one in the TeX distribution tree -- will cause this behavior. > > I have not seen any evidence that this is so, and would be very surprised > if this happens. > > >> This > >> is a very frustrating and well attested bug in XeTeX (which for some > >> reason has been ignored so far by the XeTeX creator and maintainer). > > > > Theoretically, if my previous "analysis" of this issue was correct, two > > identical copies should not cause any problems, since both will have > > the same glyph IDs. I should have said a different instead of old copy, > > though. > > Indeed. The problem may occur if two *different* versions of the "same" > font (i.e., with the same font names, but different versions or different > formats -- e.g., type 1 vs truetype) are installed. As I believe I have > explained previously, it's possible that xetex will find one font during > formatting, but then xdvipdfmx finds the other at PDF generation time, and > the glyph IDs don't match. > > Obviously, it would be better if the two programs were guaranteed to always > find the same font for a given name, but ensuring this for all > configurations and environments may not be as simple as it sounds. For now, > at least, the *strong* recommendation is to have only ONE version of any > given font installed. > > JK > > > > > -- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:53:39 +0530 > From: Shrisha Rao > To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms > Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil > Message-ID: <0530ce2c-d530-448d-b9c6-b4ae32b80...@nyx.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > El jun 26, 2010, a las 7:44 p.m., Khaled Hosny escribi?: > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 07:15:02PM +0530, Shrisha Rao wrote: > > >> The best things to do would be to switch from Ubuntu to another distro > that has TeX Live 2009 (sorry, I cannot tell you which one), or else to not > install the TeX packages from the distro's manager but to install and > maintain TeX Live separately. > > > > As some one who have been using Ubuntu and texlive for several years now, > > I can safely say you are exaggerating too much here. One can easily > install > > texlive from tug on Ubuntu like any other Unix(-like) system, nothing > special > > here. Please refer to texlive documentation for installation > instructions. > > That was the second option I mentioned, to install TeX Live directly. I > don't think my comments about the difficulties of making do with Ubuntu's > own bundled circa-2007 TeX packages were too far off the mark. > > > And, IIRC, there is a PPA for texlive 2009. > > This I did not know, though it is perhaps a less satisfactory solution than > having a proper TeX Live available through the distro itself. > > Regards, > > Shrisha Rao > > > Khaled > Thanks for all your replies and I think I can at last produce a DTP package in Tamil on Linux!! Ubuntu has recently decided not include GIMP raising many eyebrows... Ubuntu is a Linux for simple M$ addicts to make the transition to Linux smooth. For experts there are many ways in life I suppose... Suki -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
On 26 Jun 2010, at 21:26, Khaled Hosny wrote: > I was thinking that xetex should always pass the full path to xdvipdfmx, > instead of relaying on the later finding the fonts on it own. But now I > think this would break xdv2pdf which can not load fonts by file path, > right? Not only for xdv2pdf; that would also be a problem in some cases for xdvipdfmx. JK -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 07:58:13PM -0700, Jonathan Kew wrote: > On 26 Jun 2010, at 16:46, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:04:05PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu wrote: > >> > >>> My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere. > >>> Having to different version of the same font installed is known to cause > >>> this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is enough > >>> to solve this issue. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Khaled > >> > >> "an old version" should not be understood literally. Two identical copies > >> of the exactly same font: one, say, in the system fonts directory, and > >> another one in the TeX distribution tree -- will cause this behavior. > > I have not seen any evidence that this is so, and would be very surprised if > this happens. > > >> This > >> is a very frustrating and well attested bug in XeTeX (which for some > >> reason has been ignored so far by the XeTeX creator and maintainer). > > > > Theoretically, if my previous "analysis" of this issue was correct, two > > identical copies should not cause any problems, since both will have > > the same glyph IDs. I should have said a different instead of old copy, > > though. > > Indeed. The problem may occur if two *different* versions of the "same" font > (i.e., with the same font names, but different versions or different formats > -- e.g., type 1 vs truetype) are installed. As I believe I have explained > previously, it's possible that xetex will find one font during formatting, > but then xdvipdfmx finds the other at PDF generation time, and the glyph IDs > don't match. > > Obviously, it would be better if the two programs were guaranteed to always > find the same font for a given name, but ensuring this for all configurations > and environments may not be as simple as it sounds. For now, at least, the > *strong* recommendation is to have only ONE version of any given font > installed. I was thinking that xetex should always pass the full path to xdvipdfmx, instead of relaying on the later finding the fonts on it own. But now I think this would break xdv2pdf which can not load fonts by file path, right? Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
On 26 Jun 2010, at 16:46, Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:04:05PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu wrote: >> >>> My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere. >>> Having to different version of the same font installed is known to cause >>> this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is enough >>> to solve this issue. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Khaled >> >> "an old version" should not be understood literally. Two identical copies >> of the exactly same font: one, say, in the system fonts directory, and >> another one in the TeX distribution tree -- will cause this behavior. I have not seen any evidence that this is so, and would be very surprised if this happens. >> This >> is a very frustrating and well attested bug in XeTeX (which for some >> reason has been ignored so far by the XeTeX creator and maintainer). > > Theoretically, if my previous "analysis" of this issue was correct, two > identical copies should not cause any problems, since both will have > the same glyph IDs. I should have said a different instead of old copy, > though. Indeed. The problem may occur if two *different* versions of the "same" font (i.e., with the same font names, but different versions or different formats -- e.g., type 1 vs truetype) are installed. As I believe I have explained previously, it's possible that xetex will find one font during formatting, but then xdvipdfmx finds the other at PDF generation time, and the glyph IDs don't match. Obviously, it would be better if the two programs were guaranteed to always find the same font for a given name, but ensuring this for all configurations and environments may not be as simple as it sounds. For now, at least, the *strong* recommendation is to have only ONE version of any given font installed. JK -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:04:05PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu wrote: > > > My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere. > > Having to different version of the same font installed is known to cause > > this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is enough > > to solve this issue. > > > > Regards, > > Khaled > > "an old version" should not be understood literally. Two identical copies > of the exactly same font: one, say, in the system fonts directory, and > another one in the TeX distribution tree -- will cause this behavior. This > is a very frustrating and well attested bug in XeTeX (which for some > reason has been ignored so far by the XeTeX creator and maintainer). Theoretically, if my previous "analysis" of this issue was correct, two identical copies should not cause any problems, since both will have the same glyph IDs. I should have said a different instead of old copy, though. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
> My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere. > Having to different version of the same font installed is known to cause > this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is enough > to solve this issue. > > Regards, > Khaled "an old version" should not be understood literally. Two identical copies of the exactly same font: one, say, in the system fonts directory, and another one in the TeX distribution tree -- will cause this behavior. This is a very frustrating and well attested bug in XeTeX (which for some reason has been ignored so far by the XeTeX creator and maintainer). Mariusz -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Problem with unicode-math and acronym packages
On 2010-06-15 16:23:33 -0700, Michael Lynch said: I've come across a conflict between the unicode-math and acronym packages. Hi Michael, Thanks for reporting this. unicode-math gets its definitions from the STIX fonts, and the complete list (some 2400 symbols) has been partially invented to cope with the new glyphs that have never had TeX names. Some of the new names are not always perfect and we need feedback like this to ensure that good names have been chosen. In this case, \ac is defined as U+223E; we'll change the name to something more proper like \invlazys. For now just comment out or change the line in unicode-math-table.tex that deals with this and it'll be fixed in the next update. Thanks, Will -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] [tex-live] xelatex crashes with this document
On 06/26/2010 03:19 AM, Heiko Oberdiek wrote: On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:03:32AM +0200, Pablo Rodríguez wrote: The text-anonymized can be found at http://www.ousia.tk/xelatex-crasher.tex. Now it crashes on page 13. [...] The problem is the footnote broken across pages. Many thanks for your replies, Norbert, Akira and Heiko. I hope Jonathan can fix the bug included in XeTeX with protrusion support. Thanks again, Pablo -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
Am 26.06.2010 um 17:28 schrieb Khaled Hosny: I do maintain 4 TeX distributions; texlive from Ubuntu (though I rarely use that), texlive 2009/2010 from tug and ConTeXt minimals. It is a matter of setting PATH properly to activate the distribution I want to use. Yes, this scheme might work pretty well: one package satisfies dependencies and makes the package management happy and working, the other packages make you happy! PATH and MANPATH and INFOPATH are the key to each of these distributions. -- Greetings Pete Claiming that the Macintosh is inferior to Windows because most people use Windows, is like saying that all other restaurants serve food that is inferior to McDonald's. -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 08:46:38PM +0530, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote: > On Saturday 26 June 2010 07:15 PM, Shrisha Rao wrote: > > >Ubuntu has been well-known to include an out-of-date TeX Live (I > >think 2007!) with many long-resolved issues. It is also problematic > >to install TeX Live or some parts of it separately if one has already > >installed the TeX packages made available by the distro, as all sorts > >of things break (or will suddenly break when there is some package > >update). The tlmgr utility also conflicts with the distro's own > >package update feature so is typically unavailable. > > On K/Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) I can trivially install via gui or > command line texlive packages currently bearing version number > 2009-7ubuntu3. > > FWIW, maintaining two separate TeXLive distributions, one from the > K/Ubuntu packages and another from the CTAN TeXLive repository is > likely to be problem prone. After installing the K/Ubuntu packages, > one simply updates and upgrades them with apt-get rather than > running tlmgr. I do maintain 4 TeX distributions; texlive from Ubuntu (though I rarely use that), texlive 2009/2010 from tug and ConTeXt minimals. It is a matter of setting PATH properly to activate the distribution I want to use. -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
On Saturday 26 June 2010 07:15 PM, Shrisha Rao wrote: Ubuntu has been well-known to include an out-of-date TeX Live (I think 2007!) with many long-resolved issues. It is also problematic to install TeX Live or some parts of it separately if one has already installed the TeX packages made available by the distro, as all sorts of things break (or will suddenly break when there is some package update). The tlmgr utility also conflicts with the distro's own package update feature so is typically unavailable. On K/Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) I can trivially install via gui or command line texlive packages currently bearing version number 2009-7ubuntu3. FWIW, maintaining two separate TeXLive distributions, one from the K/Ubuntu packages and another from the CTAN TeXLive repository is likely to be problem prone. After installing the K/Ubuntu packages, one simply updates and upgrades them with apt-get rather than running tlmgr. Your comments above do not come within the ambit of my experience. -- Chandra -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
El jun 26, 2010, a las 7:44 p.m., Khaled Hosny escribió: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 07:15:02PM +0530, Shrisha Rao wrote: >> The best things to do would be to switch from Ubuntu to another distro that >> has TeX Live 2009 (sorry, I cannot tell you which one), or else to not >> install the TeX packages from the distro's manager but to install and >> maintain TeX Live separately. > > As some one who have been using Ubuntu and texlive for several years now, > I can safely say you are exaggerating too much here. One can easily install > texlive from tug on Ubuntu like any other Unix(-like) system, nothing special > here. Please refer to texlive documentation for installation instructions. That was the second option I mentioned, to install TeX Live directly. I don't think my comments about the difficulties of making do with Ubuntu's own bundled circa-2007 TeX packages were too far off the mark. > And, IIRC, there is a PPA for texlive 2009. This I did not know, though it is perhaps a less satisfactory solution than having a proper TeX Live available through the distro itself. Regards, Shrisha Rao > Khaled -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 01:45:36PM +0400, Abdulrahman Al-Abdusalalm wrote: > After running xetex on a document to test a new arabic opentype font I got > a final pdf document with completely mixed up characters (brought from the > wrong codepoints and with wrong positioning). My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere. Having to different version of the same font installed is known to cause this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is enough to solve this issue. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 07:15:02PM +0530, Shrisha Rao wrote: > El jun 26, 2010, a las 5:03 p.m., Ulrike Fischer escribió: > > > You need a more recent xelatex.ini. You can get it here > > > > http://scripts.sil.org/svn-view/xetex/TRUNK/texmf/tex/xelatex/config/ > > > > You will then have to regenerate the format. > > > > Or install a recent texlive. > > Ubuntu has been well-known to include an out-of-date TeX Live (I think 2007!) > with many long-resolved issues. It is also problematic to install TeX Live > or some parts of it separately if one has already installed the TeX packages > made available by the distro, as all sorts of things break (or will suddenly > break when there is some package update). The tlmgr utility also conflicts > with the distro's own package update feature so is typically unavailable. > > The best things to do would be to switch from Ubuntu to another distro that > has TeX Live 2009 (sorry, I cannot tell you which one), or else to not > install the TeX packages from the distro's manager but to install and > maintain TeX Live separately. As some one who have been using Ubuntu and texlive for several years now, I can safely say you are exaggerating too much here. One can easily install texlive from tug on Ubuntu like any other Unix(-like) system, nothing special here. Please refer to texlive documentation for installation instructions. And, IIRC, there is a PPA for texlive 2009. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
Abdulrahman Al-Abdusalalm wrote:
After running xetex on a document to test a new arabic opentype font I got
a final pdf document with completely mixed up characters (brought from the
wrong codepoints and with wrong positioning). You can inspect the output
in the file attached. The source looks like:
\TeXXeTstate=1
\everypar={\setbox0=\lastbox \beginR \box0 }
%\input testfontavailability
%\font\taha="KFGQPCUthmanTahaNaskh:script=arab" at 14pt
\font\taha="KFGQPCUthmanTahaNaskh"
\taha
%\char"0628\char"0633\char"0645
%\vskip12pt
\centerline{\beginR
��� �� ��
\endR}
� ��� �� ��� ��� ��� �
��� �
��� ���
\bye
I will appreciate any kind suggestions?
Hi Abdulrahman:
I'm not familiar with using XeTeX, but it looks like you've loaded the
font *without* the script=arab (you have another line commented with
that, but the one you're using doesn't).
HTH.
--
United in adoration of Jesus,
fr. michael gilmary, mma
Most Holy Trinity Monastery
67 Dugway Road
Petersham, MA 01366-9725
www.MaroniteMonks.org
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
El jun 26, 2010, a las 5:03 p.m., Ulrike Fischer escribió: > You need a more recent xelatex.ini. You can get it here > > http://scripts.sil.org/svn-view/xetex/TRUNK/texmf/tex/xelatex/config/ > > You will then have to regenerate the format. > > Or install a recent texlive. Ubuntu has been well-known to include an out-of-date TeX Live (I think 2007!) with many long-resolved issues. It is also problematic to install TeX Live or some parts of it separately if one has already installed the TeX packages made available by the distro, as all sorts of things break (or will suddenly break when there is some package update). The tlmgr utility also conflicts with the distro's own package update feature so is typically unavailable. The best things to do would be to switch from Ubuntu to another distro that has TeX Live 2009 (sorry, I cannot tell you which one), or else to not install the TeX packages from the distro's manager but to install and maintain TeX Live separately. Regards, Shrisha Rao > Ulrike Fischer -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
[XeTeX] xetex arabic fonts issue
After running xetex on a document to test a new arabic opentype font I got
a final pdf document with completely mixed up characters (brought from the
wrong codepoints and with wrong positioning). You can inspect the output
in the file attached. The source looks like:
\TeXXeTstate=1
> \everypar={\setbox0=\lastbox \beginR \box0 }
> %\input testfontavailability
> %\font\taha="KFGQPCUthmanTahaNaskh:script=arab" at 14pt
> \font\taha="KFGQPCUthmanTahaNaskh"
> \taha
> %\char"0628\char"0633\char"0645
> %\vskip12pt
> \centerline{\beginR
> بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
> \endR}
> الحمد لله رب العالمين، والصلاة والسلام على أشرف المرسلين سيدنا محمد وعلى
> آله وصحبه أجمعيــن،
> أما بعد
> \bye
>
I will appreciate any kind suggestions?
--
Abdulrahman AAl Abdulsalam
Assistant Lecturer - IT Department
College of Applied Science
P.O. Box 699
Nizwa, 611
Oman
testUthmanTaha.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
Am Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:10:56 +0530 schrieb Venkatesan. S.K. (TNQ): > Undefined control sequence. > l.94 \newXeTeXintercharclass > \...@normalclass %TODO > > I suppose some things are seriously broken > May be I can solve it by upgrading to latest Ubuntu > and upgrading the packages... You need a more recent xelatex.ini. You can get it here http://scripts.sil.org/svn-view/xetex/TRUNK/texmf/tex/xelatex/config/ You will then have to regenerate the format. Or install a recent texlive. -- Ulrike Fischer -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
Am 26.06.2010 um 06:40 schrieb Venkatesan. S.K. (TNQ): Undefined control sequence. l.94 \newXeTeXintercharclass Just update! (With tlmgr, for example.) -- Mit friedvollen Grüßen Pete Spam will be a thing of the past in two years' time. – Bill Gates, Jan 2004 -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
