Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?
On 10/15/15 8:49 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 10/14/2015 12:26 PM, Chris Simmonds wrote: >> >> On 14/10/15 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 10/14/15 8:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. Leading on from that, is 12 months enough? Most projects have a lifecycle that is much longer. Is there an argument for an LTS Yocto release, maybe once a year? If not, what is the recommended way for a project developer to keep a distribution up to date in the light of the several well-publicised security flaws that have been discovered over the last year or so and the new ones that will no doubt be discovered in the future? >>> >>> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_overall_support_plan_for_the_Yocto_Project.3F >>> >>> =What is the release cycle of the Yocto Project?= >>> Each release of the Yocto Project is subject to its own release schedule >>> according to the community-maintained Project Planning Guide. It is >>> generally >>> expected that a new version of the Yocto Project will be released every six >>> months. >>> >>> =What is the overall support plan for the Yocto Project?= >>> Security patches and critical bug fixes are supplied one release back. No >>> toolchain or kernel changes are allowed for these updates. Support for >>> longer >>> periods of time can be supplied by commercial OSVs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Effectively this means that support is on the last two releases. Releases >>> are >>> typically released every 6 months. After that point it is usually >>> supported by >>> OSVs, or others that offer commercial services. In the past we have done a >>> few >>> very late security fixes past the 'last two releases' point, however that >>> has >>> been for unique situations. >>> >>> You should consider keeping current with the Yocto Project releases or >>> consider >>> commercial support if you need more then an approx 12 - 18 month support >>> cycle. >>> >>> --Mark >>> >> >> Thanks, that is all clear now. > > We wouldn't be opposed to a group of people supporting a release for > longer. But they would need to provide the people to do the work. LTS > work is hard. Not to mention keeping build infrastructure setup, copies of supported OS working, QA and Target machines working. As an OSV, its not uncommon to support a distro for 10 or more years. - Armin > > Philip > >> >> Chris >> -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?
On 15/10/15 16:49, Philip Balister wrote: > On 10/14/2015 12:26 PM, Chris Simmonds wrote: >> >> On 14/10/15 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 10/14/15 8:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. Leading on from that, is 12 months enough? Most projects have a lifecycle that is much longer. Is there an argument for an LTS Yocto release, maybe once a year? If not, what is the recommended way for a project developer to keep a distribution up to date in the light of the several well-publicised security flaws that have been discovered over the last year or so and the new ones that will no doubt be discovered in the future? >>> >>> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_overall_support_plan_for_the_Yocto_Project.3F >>> >>> =What is the release cycle of the Yocto Project?= >>> Each release of the Yocto Project is subject to its own release schedule >>> according to the community-maintained Project Planning Guide. It is >>> generally >>> expected that a new version of the Yocto Project will be released every six >>> months. >>> >>> =What is the overall support plan for the Yocto Project?= >>> Security patches and critical bug fixes are supplied one release back. No >>> toolchain or kernel changes are allowed for these updates. Support for >>> longer >>> periods of time can be supplied by commercial OSVs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Effectively this means that support is on the last two releases. Releases >>> are >>> typically released every 6 months. After that point it is usually >>> supported by >>> OSVs, or others that offer commercial services. In the past we have done a >>> few >>> very late security fixes past the 'last two releases' point, however that >>> has >>> been for unique situations. >>> >>> You should consider keeping current with the Yocto Project releases or >>> consider >>> commercial support if you need more then an approx 12 - 18 month support >>> cycle. >>> >>> --Mark >>> >> >> Thanks, that is all clear now. > > We wouldn't be opposed to a group of people supporting a release for > longer. But they would need to provide the people to do the work. LTS > work is hard. > > Philip > >> >> Chris >> > Indeed, it is hard work. But there is a community out there with the expertise and many very profitable corporations that depend on Yocto Project (in addition to Intel, I mean, since they put a lot of resource in already). It would be really nice if someone neutral - Linux Foundation for example - could bring them together to make LTS work for everybody. Chris. -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?
On 10/14/2015 12:26 PM, Chris Simmonds wrote: > > On 14/10/15 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 10/14/15 8:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? >>> Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was >>> the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a >>> declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. >>> >>> Leading on from that, is 12 months enough? Most projects have a >>> lifecycle that is much longer. Is there an argument for an LTS Yocto >>> release, maybe once a year? If not, what is the recommended way for a >>> project developer to keep a distribution up to date in the light of the >>> several well-publicised security flaws that have been discovered over >>> the last year or so and the new ones that will no doubt be discovered in >>> the future? >> >> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_overall_support_plan_for_the_Yocto_Project.3F >> >> =What is the release cycle of the Yocto Project?= >> Each release of the Yocto Project is subject to its own release schedule >> according to the community-maintained Project Planning Guide. It is generally >> expected that a new version of the Yocto Project will be released every six >> months. >> >> =What is the overall support plan for the Yocto Project?= >> Security patches and critical bug fixes are supplied one release back. No >> toolchain or kernel changes are allowed for these updates. Support for longer >> periods of time can be supplied by commercial OSVs. >> >> >> >> Effectively this means that support is on the last two releases. Releases >> are >> typically released every 6 months. After that point it is usually supported >> by >> OSVs, or others that offer commercial services. In the past we have done a >> few >> very late security fixes past the 'last two releases' point, however that has >> been for unique situations. >> >> You should consider keeping current with the Yocto Project releases or >> consider >> commercial support if you need more then an approx 12 - 18 month support >> cycle. >> >> --Mark >> > > Thanks, that is all clear now. We wouldn't be opposed to a group of people supporting a release for longer. But they would need to provide the people to do the work. LTS work is hard. Philip > > Chris > -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?
On 14/10/15 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 10/14/15 8:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? >> Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was >> the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a >> declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. >> >> Leading on from that, is 12 months enough? Most projects have a >> lifecycle that is much longer. Is there an argument for an LTS Yocto >> release, maybe once a year? If not, what is the recommended way for a >> project developer to keep a distribution up to date in the light of the >> several well-publicised security flaws that have been discovered over >> the last year or so and the new ones that will no doubt be discovered in >> the future? > > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_overall_support_plan_for_the_Yocto_Project.3F > > =What is the release cycle of the Yocto Project?= > Each release of the Yocto Project is subject to its own release schedule > according to the community-maintained Project Planning Guide. It is generally > expected that a new version of the Yocto Project will be released every six > months. > > =What is the overall support plan for the Yocto Project?= > Security patches and critical bug fixes are supplied one release back. No > toolchain or kernel changes are allowed for these updates. Support for longer > periods of time can be supplied by commercial OSVs. > > > > Effectively this means that support is on the last two releases. Releases are > typically released every 6 months. After that point it is usually supported > by > OSVs, or others that offer commercial services. In the past we have done a > few > very late security fixes past the 'last two releases' point, however that has > been for unique situations. > > You should consider keeping current with the Yocto Project releases or > consider > commercial support if you need more then an approx 12 - 18 month support > cycle. > > --Mark > Thanks, that is all clear now. Chris -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?
On 10/14/15 8:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? > Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was > the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a > declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. > > Leading on from that, is 12 months enough? Most projects have a > lifecycle that is much longer. Is there an argument for an LTS Yocto > release, maybe once a year? If not, what is the recommended way for a > project developer to keep a distribution up to date in the light of the > several well-publicised security flaws that have been discovered over > the last year or so and the new ones that will no doubt be discovered in > the future? https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_overall_support_plan_for_the_Yocto_Project.3F =What is the release cycle of the Yocto Project?= Each release of the Yocto Project is subject to its own release schedule according to the community-maintained Project Planning Guide. It is generally expected that a new version of the Yocto Project will be released every six months. =What is the overall support plan for the Yocto Project?= Security patches and critical bug fixes are supplied one release back. No toolchain or kernel changes are allowed for these updates. Support for longer periods of time can be supplied by commercial OSVs. Effectively this means that support is on the last two releases. Releases are typically released every 6 months. After that point it is usually supported by OSVs, or others that offer commercial services. In the past we have done a few very late security fixes past the 'last two releases' point, however that has been for unique situations. You should consider keeping current with the Yocto Project releases or consider commercial support if you need more then an approx 12 - 18 month support cycle. --Mark > Regards, > Chris Simmonds > -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?
On 15-10-14 11:12 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, On 14/10/15 14:50, akuster808 wrote: Chris, On 10/14/2015 06:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. There is a release every 6 months. https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_release_cycle_of_the_Yocto_Project.3F Leading on from that, is 12 months enough? Most projects have a lifecycle that is much longer. Is there an argument for an LTS Yocto release, maybe once a year? If not, what is the recommended way for a project developer to keep a distribution up to date in the light of the several well-publicised security flaws that have been discovered over the last year or so and the new ones that will no doubt be discovered in the future? At table of the current supported release can be found at https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_branch_maintenance - Armin Thanks, Armin, that is the kind of thing I was looking for. It doesn't mention a timespan for updates, but there does seem to be an implicit maintenance period of 12 months after release. I am still worried that this is a rather short period of time, though, and encourages device manufacturers to avoid ever updating boxes in the field. For longer term support, or for support of truly critical devices, the Yocto project has relied on OSVs to offer commercial support for their Yocto compatible distributions. For the project itself, and the projects under the umbrella, the developer capacity to maintain and support a release for longer than a year simply doesn't exist. And that lack of cycles is only from the point of view of duration, much less to offer something that looks like a SLA on critical issues. Cheers, Bruce Regards, Chris Simmonds -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?
Hi, On 14/10/15 14:50, akuster808 wrote: > Chris, > > > On 10/14/2015 06:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? >> Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was >> the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a >> declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. > > There is a release every 6 months. > > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_release_cycle_of_the_Yocto_Project.3F > >> >> Leading on from that, is 12 months enough? Most projects have a >> lifecycle that is much longer. Is there an argument for an LTS Yocto >> release, maybe once a year? If not, what is the recommended way for a >> project developer to keep a distribution up to date in the light of the >> several well-publicised security flaws that have been discovered over >> the last year or so and the new ones that will no doubt be discovered in >> the future? > > At table of the current supported release can be found at > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_branch_maintenance > > - Armin > Thanks, Armin, that is the kind of thing I was looking for. It doesn't mention a timespan for updates, but there does seem to be an implicit maintenance period of 12 months after release. I am still worried that this is a rather short period of time, though, and encourages device manufacturers to avoid ever updating boxes in the field. >> >> Regards, >> Chris Simmonds >> > -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?
Chris, On 10/14/2015 06:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? > Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was > the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a > declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. There is a release every 6 months. https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_release_cycle_of_the_Yocto_Project.3F > > Leading on from that, is 12 months enough? Most projects have a > lifecycle that is much longer. Is there an argument for an LTS Yocto > release, maybe once a year? If not, what is the recommended way for a > project developer to keep a distribution up to date in the light of the > several well-publicised security flaws that have been discovered over > the last year or so and the new ones that will no doubt be discovered in > the future? At table of the current supported release can be found at https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_branch_maintenance - Armin > > Regards, > Chris Simmonds > -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
[yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?
Hi, Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was the case for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 for example, but I cannot see a declaration anywhere that this is the expected norm. Leading on from that, is 12 months enough? Most projects have a lifecycle that is much longer. Is there an argument for an LTS Yocto release, maybe once a year? If not, what is the recommended way for a project developer to keep a distribution up to date in the light of the several well-publicised security flaws that have been discovered over the last year or so and the new ones that will no doubt be discovered in the future? Regards, Chris Simmonds -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto