Oh no, I've got to stop doing that, it's really embarrassing. I think I get it
from my Mum, who BTW is the living embodiment of 313 in case anyone was
wondering about the relevance of this email...
You wrote:
>
>
>
>
> m yep ;)
>
>
>
n 'funny ha ha' and 'funny peculiar' -
personally I find it sidesplittingly pantwettingly hilarious, but I'm
weird.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: Re:
cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
03/04/04 09:38 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: (313) Big
Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of
ent: 04 March 2004 15:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brendan Nelson
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe
> story of the
> Original Hot Mix 5)
>
>
> I think people here ARE obsessed, but in a perfectly natural,
> healthy way o
OTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of
the Original Hot Mix 5)
Not totally following you there, since 'entertaining', 'perplexing' and
'deviant' are all words that I would use 'funny' as an al
]; Brendan Nelson
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe
> story of the
> Original Hot Mix 5)
>
>
> I think people here ARE obsessed, but in a perfectly natural,
> healthy way of course.
>
> -Original Message-
>
Not totally following you there, since 'entertaining', 'perplexing' and
'deviant' are all words that I would use 'funny' as an alternative to. Could
you explain what you mean a bit, or am I taking a joke to literally (again)? :)
You wrote:
>
> >>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us
(wasThe story of the
Original Hot Mix 5)
And of course then we must examine what you refer to as "This"
and quite possibly why you insist on using "*"
And of course then we must examine what you refer to as "This"
and quite possibly why you insist on using "*" instead of "_"
MEK
"Brendan Nelson"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 March 2004 15:25
>
> >>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being a bunch of
> definition obsessed trainspotters.
>
> I wouldn't exactly say that we are definition obsessed...
This obviou
>>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being a bunch of
definition obsessed trainspotters.
I wouldn't exactly say that we are definition obsessed - more like a
slightly unhealthy preoccupation with objects and figures that nobody else
really cares for.
And, I'm sorry, but I have
>
> Isn't there an inherent contradiction there? Don't we stop being outsiders
> once we've found other people like ourselves to form a group with? I think
> being a outsider (i.e. fundamentally isolated/misunderstood) is a bittersweet
> experience at best. I've had periods in my life like that a
This self-image has two component parts: personal identity and social
identity (the number of social identities one person may have has no
theoretical limit).
Does this mean it's okay to belong to the idm list AND 313?
--
Mike
> I nearly wet pants at the post that said "techno without the 4/4 drum is
> breaks"
>
> Brilliant!
It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being a bunch of definition
obsessed trainspotters. I've been to and enjoyed the Big Chill (though I have
to admit more for the late night mong
i love this listyesterday we were talking about ball hanging out of
G-strings and today social theory
keep it coming
:)
robin...
On 4 Mar 2004, at 14:24, Ken Odeluga wrote:
Does it matter that we're so cut off from the mainstream?
I personally wouldn't have it any other way, b
> Does it matter that we're so cut off from the mainstream?
>> I personally wouldn't have it any other way, but then again my
>income doe=
>> sn't rely on it.
All this is reminding me of some theories which I came across in the distant
past ...
"Social identity theories Tajfel and Turner, amon
dn't have it any other way, but then again my income doe=
> sn't rely on it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:45 PM
> To: Martin
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) Big Chill vs
above social group.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> 4/3/04 12:15 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: "Dan Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Date: 4 March 2004 12:13:17 GMT
>>>> To: robin <[EMAIL PR
>From my personal experience : among my friends, a number of them will know
>(and love), say, Plastikman, Kenny Larkin, and Maurizio, but without
>necessarily seeing them as part of a common scene / network of influences...
>they won't know what 313 means, but know the artists talked about.
Gwe
OTECTED]>
> >> Date: 4 March 2004 12:13:17 GMT
> >> To: robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Subject: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of the
> >> Original Hot Mix 5)
> >>
> >> Interesting thread there Robin
> >>
>
> >
> >> From: "Dan Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: 4 March 2004 12:13:17 GMT
> >> To: robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Subject: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of the
> >> Original Hot Mix 5)
> >>
> >
nd above social group.
Martin
4/3/04 12:15 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>> From: "Dan Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 4 March 2004 12:13:17 GMT
>> To: robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of the
>
From: "Dan Bean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 4 March 2004 12:13:17 GMT
To: robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of the
Original Hot Mix 5)
Interesting thread there Robin
If there are any other work avoiders out there check
23 matches
Mail list logo
