Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-31 Thread Sakari Karipuro
David Beattie wrote on Mon, 31 May 2004 about following: > Thanks Sakke - he did describe it as hard but said it > still had the funk so I asked if it fell into the Alan > Oldham, Fannon Flowers, Rob Hood type area and he said > yes - was he a bit off with that? not much.. they are a bit harder t

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-31 Thread David Beattie
Thanks Sakke - he did describe it as hard but said it still had the funk so I asked if it fell into the Alan Oldham, Fannon Flowers, Rob Hood type area and he said yes - was he a bit off with that? Cheers BT --- Sakari Karipuro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Beattie wrote on Mon, 31 May 2004

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-31 Thread Sakari Karipuro
David Beattie wrote on Mon, 31 May 2004 about following: > Techno he said I should check out a label called D and > that apparently the latest releases are D7 & D8. I > have never heard of them and cant find anything about > them on discogs - anyone shed any light? this one? http://www.discogs.c

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-31 Thread David Beattie
While on the topic of Jockey Slut I met someone at the Rob Gretton memorial gig in Manchester last weekend who used to write for them a good few years ago, cant be sure but I think his name was John Masters (perhaps TMF will correct me ;-) anyway, shock horror we got talking abour music and when w

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-31 Thread alex . bond
TomC>http://www.keeponmagazine.com - on more of a house tip I guess but >seems like it's done with a bit of passion... I agree! It is great, and done with passion. I've got one moan about it though. The reviews section.. loads of different 'genres', but no 'techno' section. Even worse, they have

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread yussel
pour some out for muh homeys On Fri, 28 May 2004, De Block, Mario wrote: > very, very, very, very, very, very etc sad. jockey was one of the few that > really got passion on every page > > Tom Magic Feet schreef: > > > I haven't posted for a while, so it's unfortunate that the first time I do >

RE: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread ian cheshire
sorry to hear that Tom...its a blow to the dance scene as JS was the best out there in terms of reviews etc.. -Original Message- From: Tom Magic Feet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 May 2004 18:23 To: 313 mailing list Subject: (313) Jockey Slut goes down I haven't posted for a

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread Thorin Teague
You guys have magazines about techno? Lucky brits! :-) hehe Tom Magic Feet writes: So, what titles are left in the UK now? DJ, IDJ, The Wire, M8, Mixrag... any more? Bah, TOM

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread Sakari Karipuro
Tom Magic Feet wrote on Fri, 28 May 2004 about following: > I haven't posted for a while, so it's unfortunate that the first time I do > post again it is to share bad news: the publishing company behind Jockey > Slut magazine (and Sleaze, formerly Sleazenation) has gone into liquidation. oh well.

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread Tom Magic Feet
Would you please remove your tongue from my arse, Tom? I'll still review your records! :-) - Original Message - From: Tom Churchill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 313 <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 6:36 PM Subject: Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down > A few

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread De Block, Mario
the cover design was sad maybe. too glossy or i don't know what, just too corporate. before it was rough paper, which was better, as a warm touch always is ;) i have a stack of old ones in my bedroom just because it's cosy ;) but in order for british humour, the colourful design overall, the ridden

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread Tom Churchill
A few years ago, maybe I'd agree - but IMHO its quality had been on the wane for quite some time... TMF's techno reviews excepted of course :) On 28 May 2004, at 19:31, De Block, Mario wrote: very, very, very, very, very, very etc sad. jockey was one of the few that really got passion on every

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread Tom Churchill
Straight No Chaser regularly covers techno and related styles these days, and Keep On magazine looks pretty good: http://www.keeponmagazine.com - on more of a house tip I guess but seems like it's done with a bit of passion... Cheers, Tom On 28 May 2004, at 18:23, Tom Magic Feet wrote: So,

Re: (313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread De Block, Mario
very, very, very, very, very, very etc sad. jockey was one of the few that really got passion on every page Tom Magic Feet schreef: > I haven't posted for a while, so it's unfortunate that the first time I do > post again it is to share bad news: the publishing company behind Jockey > Slut magazi

(313) Jockey Slut goes down

2004-05-28 Thread Tom Magic Feet
I haven't posted for a while, so it's unfortunate that the first time I do post again it is to share bad news: the publishing company behind Jockey Slut magazine (and Sleaze, formerly Sleazenation) has gone into liquidation. The new issue - the first in the new 3-monthly format - has just been prin