" To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: [313] Dream
Sequence? Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:55:20 +0100
It's a re-release of an old Blake Baxter album. The original album was
released in 1992 or so. This is definitly not Blake's best work. Try his
latest work or his earliest.
> ca
i think that Tresor 160 is his latest. or maybe i'm wrong?
regards
ivan
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Jongsma, K.J. wrote:
>
> It's a re-release of an old Blake Baxter album. The original album was
> released in 1992 or so. This is definitly not Blake's best work. Try his
> latest work or his earlies
Haye!
> can someone post me a review on Dream Sequence album on Tresor (i think it
> is Tresor 160) and also some more info on this artist, please?
Well, it seems most people are not very fond of "Dream Sequence", but it's
in my "quick-access" shelf...
The one I have is Tresor 149, though.
There
hmm i should update my record database in my brain or so... :)
kj
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: John Osselaer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 9 februari 2001 14:53
Aan: 'Jongsma, K.J.'; 313@hyperreal.org
Onderwerp: RE: [313] Dream Sequence?
Ermm, no it's
Have a look at this link for a review
http://www.etronik.com/section.asp?sectionId=10&IssueId=88
I don't think much of etronik reviews, but it was the only one I could find
in my short search...
> I think imma have to correct you on that one. There was indeed a
re-release of the Dream Sequence
I think imma have to correct you on that one. There was indeed a re-release of
the Dream Sequence LP a while ago, but only a few weeks back Tresor released a
new Dream Sequence EP with three tracks, and this week or next week will see
the release of a new dream sequence LP, which I saw on CD las
It's a re-release of an old Blake Baxter album. The original album was
released in 1992 or so. This is definitly not Blake's best work. Try his
latest work or his earliest.
> can someone post me a review on Dream Sequence album on
> Tresor (i think it
> is Tresor 160) and also some more info on
