I was thinking about buying the entire Theo's Ugly Edits series.
Anyone here has a hint or a good source to buy from?
Kw
-- Original Message --
From: David Gillies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Ugly Edits 2
>A - harold melvin & the blue notes - the love i lost
>B - (Switch track)
theres actually 2 b sides on the real pressings of ugly edits 2,
neither of which i can ID.
tom
_
Ugly Edits 2 B samples rahsaan patterson "it ain't love"
c*
David Gillies wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm following up from this thread from last year and filling in some
gaps from this list and updating it. Anyone know what the B side of ugly
edit 2 and B2 of ugly edi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm following up from this thread from last year and filling in some
gaps from this list and updating it. Anyone know what the B side of ugly
edit 2 and B2 of ugly edit 5 is?
Ugly Edits 1
A - made in usa - never gonna let u Ggo
B - jill scott - slowly
that was posted this is
your warning.
burns
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) Ugly edits 9/10
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:47:40 +0100
a heads up
talk of them here.
ha ha, I'm laughing my tits off at those guys hoping that Peaches & Prunes
edit comes out.
th
>... you're sure it's really the one from from the 'LT1/Mustang' you
>have on your CD-R ???
well, of course that is possible...
I couldn't quite believe how whack it was to be honest - have you heard it?
is it a real sloppy thing??
also the other point is, the track doesn't really need an edit
speaking of which, i picked up legitimate represses of the first 3
ugly edits yesterday, which made me quite happy.
tom
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:47:40 +0100
>a heads up
>
>talk of them here.
>
>ha ha, I'm l
hehehe ... that was me ;)
of course I'm still hoping to get this one AND I don't think it is crap
... you're sure it's really the one from from the 'LT1/Mustang' you
have on your CD-R ???
there is also a Ron Hardy Edit on Automan available ... listen here:
http://www.piccadillyrecords.com/mp3/Au
a heads up
talk of them here.
ha ha, I'm laughing my tits off at those guys hoping that Peaches & Prunes
edit comes out.
that has to be the whack-est most pointless edit I ever heard. My mate gave
me a cdr of it a while ago. Straight up, it sounds like they did it with 2
decks. Ha. I could have
t;
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: (313) ugly edits (full detail)
-- Original Message --
From: "Maarten Baute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I actually consider theo parrish to be a GREAT producer.
OTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: (313) ugly edits (full detail)
Hi!
My feeling is that I love most of what Theo does, but as a (much,
much, much) less successful producer, I hear things in otherwise great
trac
t;
To: "Maarten Baute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kent Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: (313) ugly edits (full detail)
Well I see what you're saying, thou
ugly edits 4
the dells - no way back
and: minnie ripperton - stick together (?)
ugly edits 5
roger - A Chuck Of Sugar
and: sugarhill gang - hot, hot summerday
_
MSN Search, for accurate results! http://search.msn.nl
this is definately true. the one time theo played for me, we had
to actually buy some crappy mixer on ebay that he insisted on using. he later
bitche
about the sound system, which at the time pissed me off, but whatever,
it's cool. i'd rather work with an artist and try to do something
different a
On Nov 23, 2004, at 9:54 AM, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hold on a god darned minute - did you really only like one track
on the whole thing.seriously?
yeah i dont even know what to say about that. ther
-- Original Message --
From: "Maarten Baute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I actually consider theo parrish to be a GREAT producer. Take a
listen to
>"dan ryan" or "lights donw low (this one mix)". I am sure he
spends a lot of
>time making the sounds sound like t
-- Original Message --
From: "Maarten Baute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>yes, I am serious. And I am aware of the fact that I am about the
only one
>who only likes the theo parrish track. The other tracks sound so
pollished
>to me. It's like they want to get de
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Hold on a god darned minute - did you really only like one track
on
>the whole thing.seriously?
yeah i dont even know what to say about that. theres plenty of
good cuts on there.
tom
___
>Haven't heard this - is it on the beatdown remixes LP?
>At 1:56 pm + 23/11/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I also think one of Norm Talley's tracks 'Change'
>
>ooh, I like the Mike Huckaby mix of this track.
Hi Dan.
No, it's on a 12" that came out shortly after. It's worth checking, I think
Haven't heard this - is it on the beatdown remixes LP?
At 1:56 pm + 23/11/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I also think one of Norm Talley's tracks 'Change'
ooh, I like the Mike Huckaby mix of this track.
>I also think one of Norm Talley's tracks 'Change'
ooh, I like the Mike Huckaby mix of this track.
very good.
_
- End of message text
This e-mail is sent by the above named in
their individua
Well I see what you're saying, though to my ears the Rick Wilhite
track is rougher in some ways than the Theo track - maybe in an
atonal way - I also think one of Norm Talley's tracks 'Change', is
quite raw.
At 1:08 pm +0100 23/11/04, Maarten Baute wrote:
Hi Dan,
>Can't wait for the Carl Cr
i Vari' for
instance.)
k
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2004 12:03
To: Maarten Baute; Kent Williams; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) ugly edits (full detail)
>Can't wait for the Carl Cr
>Hold on a god darned minute - did you really only like one track on
>the whole thing.seriously?
I thought it was a cool comp!
sounded different, fresh!
I really like the eddie fowlkes track, that was my fave at the time, but
others have grown on me since.
Alex
_
7; for
instance.)
k
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2004 12:03
To: Maarten Baute; Kent Williams; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) ugly edits (full detail)
>Can't wait for the Carl Craig remix of
oh! thanx! shows how well I pay attention to these threads. I thought the
subject had somehow gotten off track and I'd missed the switch :^)
I remember my first Sound Signature record. someone had given it to me
because he'd gotten doubles. when I first played it and heard the poor sound
quality an
Hi Dan,
>Can't wait for the Carl Craig remix of "Falling Up". I had to sell the
>detroit beatdown compilation because I couldn't bear the tought that I
>had a triple record pack with only one good track on it.
Hold on a god darned minute - did you really only like one track on the
whole thin
I have the whites of this comp, but I dont recall the track you guys are
talking about. who's track is "falling up" on this 3 pack? I may have to
dig
it out to see if I somehow overlooked the one good track on the set.
The "Falling Up" track is the one by Theo Parrish himself. I think it is th
Can't wait for the Carl Craig remix of "Falling Up". I had to sell
the detroit beatdown compilation because I couldn't bear the tought
that I had a triple record pack with only one good track on it.
Hold on a god darned minute - did you really only like one track on
the whole thing.serious
"Falling Up" is the Theo Parrish track. I think it's amongst his best.
-Original Message-
From: M : A : T : R : I : X [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2004 11:53
To: Maarten Baute; Kent Williams; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) u
OUCH! Thats harsh :^)
I have the whites of this comp, but I dont recall the track you guys are
talking about. who's track is "falling up" on this 3 pack? I may have to dig
it out to see if I somehow overlooked the one good track on the set.
sean
on 11/23/04 5:46 AM, Maarten Baute at [EMAIL PROTE
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) ugly edits (full detail)
Hi!
> My feeling is that I love most of what Theo does, but as a (much,
> much, much) less successful producer, I hear things in otherwise great
> tracks that are 'wrong' in a way that is a
Hi!
My feeling is that I love most of what Theo does, but as a (much,
much, much) less successful producer, I hear things in otherwise great
tracks that are 'wrong' in a way that is a sharp stick in the ear for
no discernable artistic reason. Some tracks I want to remaster -
mostly run them thr
>>While on this note, anyone know when that Carl Craig remix
>of 'Falling Up'
>is due?
*spits coffee all over computer*
you what?
hmm, that sounds alright. yes, I want one.
_
- End of message text --
Shawn is just particular, I know he doesn't care for some Theo
records, but hey it's OK not to like stuff. Just so it doesn't devolve
here into some sort of Shawn- or Theo- bash-a-thon, I've never heard
Shawn disrespect Theo as a person or a musician. Beyond the fact that
Shawn is a great musicia
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 November 2004 00:10
> To: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: (313) ugly edits (full detail)
>
> just to be annoying
Success!!! ;)
> but thats not the point. i actually
Mental Note: Must play Whitehouse really loud when over in the D ;)
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i really love overdriving things, its been that way with me for a
long time. i can remember being at my friends house when he got a
4 track for
cc
Subject
-- Original Message --
From: "Tristan Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Tom and I seem to have this disagreement once/week these days. ;)
I'm all
>for a bit of grit in recordings, or lo-fi production in general,
but that
>doesn't excuse a crappy recording, whi
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Lees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 November 2004 19:08
> To: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) ugly edits (full detail)
>
> Thanks this is useful.
>
> I wondered why my #2 sounded so bad.
>
> It'
. If anybody wants to keep creating they have to be about
> change."
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt MacQueen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 4:38 PM
> > To: Michael Lees
> > Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
>
]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 4:38 PM
> To: Michael Lees
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) ugly edits (full detail)
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2004, at 1:08 PM, Michael Lees wrote:
>
> > Thanks this is useful.
> >
> > I wondered why my #2 sounded so
there's a fine line between lo-fi aesthetic and unpleasant on the ears.
theo can land on either side of the line. i certainly 'get' the lo-fi
thing (you're talking to a guy with a whole lot of lou barlow 7-inch
records) but when it becomes painful on the ears (which i've seen theo do)
then i vote w
-- Original Message --
From: Kent Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On listening on line to the tracks, I think it was the splashy
hihat
>sound on 'Ebonics' not the snare on 'Dusty Cabinets' that Shawn
was
>objecting to.
shawn is just a theo hater. i dont dis
On listening on line to the tracks, I think it was the splashy hihat
sound on 'Ebonics' not the snare on 'Dusty Cabinets' that Shawn was
objecting to.
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:59:27 -0600, Kent Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As much as I like what theo parrish does, in general, as a studio
>
As much as I like what theo parrish does, in general, as a studio
weenie I wish he'd be a little more of a studio weeny, as in trying to
make things sound 'good' in traditional pro-audio terms.
To quote Shawn Rudiman, reviewing 'Dusty Cabinets' at the Shorecrest,
"there's just no excuse for that s
On Nov 22, 2004, at 1:08 PM, Michael Lees wrote:
Thanks this is useful.
I wondered why my #2 sounded so bad.
I have most of the Ugly Edits, some i bought in a rush and others
really thought about, they're certainly not ALL knockouts but the
better ones do have their moments (the Jill Scott
Thanks this is useful.
I wondered why my #2 sounded so bad.
It's very annoying, probably should have realised as it was fairly cheap
and in stock.
I think my friendly children might be a bootleg too, although it doesn't
look like one, the kick is really bad.
Seen as I buy quite a bit onlin
>i picked up this boot ugly edit 6 last week. the long, one-sided track
>(which i believe was on ugly edit 1) has tweaked out frequencies which
>really distort on my system. i know theo loves to f*%ck with the eqs, but
>this is near unplayable. how are the frequencies on the original edit 1?
Jame
cc
Subject
(313) ugly
>>
Theo Parrish - Ugly Edits (Vol. 2) (Not On Label)
Format: 12"
Country: US?
Year: 2002
Catalog #: UGEDT002
Tracklisting:
A Untitled
B1 Untitled
B2 Untitled
Note:
Original white label with 3 disco edits. Tracks A & B1 got bootlegged on UGE
002?
>>
Yes, this is the ORIGINAL ugly edits #2. The on
I want to complete/correct this list I put together. Can you help me?
Thank you very very much!
(Source: Discogs, Rush Hour, Nuloop, Beyond Jazz forum)
Theo Parrish - Ugly Edits (Vol. 1) (Not On Label)
Format: 12"
Country: US
Year: 2002
Catalog #: UGE 001
Tracklisting:
A Never Gonna Let U Go (T
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:02:56 +0100 (MET) Simon Vrebos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Why are there 2 versions of Ugly Edits vol. 6 and are there others
> cases like this one?
Because the others are bootlegs, perhaps? The real versions have either sprayed
or hand written labels - at least those I'
the 3 tracker is a uk(?)-bootleg, afaik
original comes with 2 tracks, has UGET06 sketched, the bootleg UGEDT06.
some infos on ugly edits, the buzz, the bootlegging, the limited
pressings, for theo himself:
http://www.overloadmedia.co.uk/archives/interviews/theo_parrish.php
c.
Simon Vrebos w
I have a copy of Ugly Edits vol. 6 with 3 tracks on it and now I discovered
there is another Ugly Edits vol. 6 with only 2 tracks on it. One of those
tracks is Theo's version of Lucille by Anthony Hamilton. Why are there 2
versions of Ugly Edits vol. 6 and are there others cases like this one?
the heads have a lot of money in Manchester it seems. they were 14 quid.
that's 42 quid for three bits of vinyl. so for the americans that's
roughly 80 bucks.
robin...
found the im the "just in"-section. but the first copies are already
gone...:(
"not currently available - sorry! First bat
er $20 for a 12"inch-bizz?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 13:25
An: Carlos de Brito
Cc: '313 Org'
Betreff: Re: AW: (313) Ugly Edits 6 7 8
hey c,
yep
www.piccadillyrecords.co.uk
have em
robin...
hey c,
yep
www.piccadillyrecords.co.uk
have em
robin...
can you post a link to the clips, please. can't wait to hear them...
thx, c.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juli 2004 12:58
An: 313 Org
Betreff: (313) Ugly Edits 6 7 8
so i see the ugly edits (6,7,8) have landed in t
so i see the ugly edits (6,7,8) have landed in the UK. anyone got em
yet?
i've heard clips which sound promising.
so what's the cheapest uk price for em then? anyone know?
robin...
Yeah- we got them last week- 6, 7 and 8
cheers
Jason
> whats the a side? i cant think of what it is and now that string
> melody is stuck in my head. argh.
The Dells - Get On Up. (from the ´77 album "they said it couldn´t be done
(but we did it)")
Cheerio,
Maarten
whats the a side? i cant think of what it is and now that string
melody is stuck in my head. argh.
tom
andythepooh.com
on.
Try it.
In this way, all my NSC-pressed techno tracks which have jumped for years,
and others, no longer do so.
F*'@$kin' ace!
k
>-Original Message-
>From: Maarten Baute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:18 PM
>To: Maarten Baute; 313@
arten Baute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 10 January 2003 14:18
To: "Maarten Baute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "313@hyperreal.org"
<313@hyperreal.org>
Subject:Re: (313) Ugly Edits #3
> I have a question about this record.. I have this now in
> I have a question about this record.. I have this now in my collection,
but
> the A-side is full with crackes and clicks and pops... is this the way
Theo
> recorded it? Because the B-side seems fine, and I don´t here clicks when
the
> music stops on the first side...
I now noticed that the B-si
Hey,
I have a question about this record.. I have this now in my collection, but
the A-side is full with crackes and clicks and pops... is this the way Theo
recorded it? Because the B-side seems fine, and I don´t here clicks when the
music stops on the first side...
Thanks for the reply,
Maarten
#1 has been bootlegged and is apparently doing the rounds in the UK for
6.5UKP, so don't go paying silly prices. There have clearly been far more
than the 500 copies of the original rumoured to have been pressed. I like
the irony of the bootlegged bootleg, especially with all the rubbish rumours
an
> FE has #2 - or at least they had it. They're out of 3. S://kimo *might*
> have 2 &3 and atomheart music (in Montreal or Toronto - can't recall
which)
> had 1 and might have all 3. I know someone from there is on the list, so
we
> may hear definitively. I got my #1 from Vibes a long time ago, but
FE has #2 - or at least they had it. They're out of 3. S://kimo *might*
have 2 &3 and atomheart music (in Montreal or Toronto - can't recall which)
had 1 and might have all 3. I know someone from there is on the list, so we
may hear definitively. I got my #1 from Vibes a long time ago, but Wilhi
while its being brought up, where are the represses avaliable
again? are they still in stock?
tom
-- Original Message --
From: "Maarten Baute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Maarten Baute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:14:14 +0100
>Hi fr
Hi friends,
I finally got myself ugly edits #1 with the beautieful "jill scott - slowely
surely" remix, I just wonder, what did theo sample to create the track on
the A-side?
I could ask the same question about ugly edits #2 and #3, I know that the
A-side of #3 samples "freddie hubbard - little s
; To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org>
> Subject: (313) [313] ugly edits - theo parrish.
>
>
> hi folks. a few days ago i was at bent crayon[cleveland, ohio record
> shop]... just shuffling through the stacks. at the end of my digging, and
> as i was making my purchas
someone asked for a tracklist on those ugly edits a couple of days ago, and
i don't know if your questions have been answered yet, so here it goes:
UGE 1:
A. made in the usa 'never let you go' re-edit
B. jill scott 'slowely surely' remix
UGE 2:
A? harold melvin & the bluenotes 'the love i los
hi folks. a few days ago i was at bent crayon[cleveland, ohio record
shop]... just shuffling through the stacks. at the end of my digging, and
as i was making my purchase, i was offered the chance to lay hands upon and
play the 2nd and 3rd "ugly edits" EP's. damn! it's some brilliant
materia
what about #4?
coming?
already out?
does anybody know?
armin?
what about #4?
coming?
already out?
does anybody know?
armin?
Memo from Alex Bond of PricewaterhouseCoopers
Start of message text
Does anyone have the tracklistings for the three ugly edits 12's?
Thanks,
Alex
- End of message text
This e-mail is intended only for the pers
gt; Memo from Alex Bond of PricewaterhouseCoopers
>>>
>>> Start of message text
>>>
>>> Just out of interest (I'm not saying there's anything wrong with it),
> why
>>> would you feel betrayed?
>>&
I'll vouch for that as he played it when he started up in Liverpool. :o)
Hopefuly it wil happen again soon Mr McIntosh.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Jonny McIntosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Re:
> >
> > Just out of interest (I'm not saying there's anything wrong with it),
why
> > would you feel betrayed?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Paul Wise <> on 09/08/2002 20:35:02
> > To:313 mailing list <>
- Original Message -
From: Chris Anglesey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: [313] Ugly Edits?
> I agree. A lot of Carl's records contain samples, probably the reason
that
> his awesome 'BFC -
there was this cd with unreleased theo parrish tracks on it (among >them
the
jill scott remix and some disco re-edits) floating around some time >ago,
did
any of these tracks reappeare on one of the ugly edits?
and which other tracks where re-edited for the ugly series?
please do shed some lig
CTED]
| Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:12 PM
| To: 313 mailing list
| Subject: Re: [313] Ugly Edits?
|
|
| I give more credit to people that come up with new stuff...
|
| Don't get me wrong it's still a great tune..but sampling something is not
| the same as coming up with it yourself
- Original Message -
From: "Jonny McIntosh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [313] Ugly Edits?
> > Sorry Paul, not having a pop at you personally, I just think it's weird
> > that you c
> Sorry Paul, not having a pop at you personally, I just think it's weird
> that you could dismiss a record that you liked up till this morining now
> you know it has a sample in it.
I do that all the time and am unashamed. I can't listen to half of Glenn
Underground's old records nowadays as a re
riday, August 09, 2002 2:20 PM
>To: Jongsma, K.J.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
>Subject: Re: [313] Ugly Edits?
>
>
>> from an old p funk all stars record i think: hydraulic pump? not so sure
>> about the title. Theo Parris used to play it... The beside (Dope
>Comp
| -Original Message-
| From: Maarten Baute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 PM
|
| > from an old p funk all stars record i think: hydraulic pump? not so sure
| > about the title. Theo Parris used to play it... The beside
| (Dope Computer)
| > samples George Cli
> from an old p funk all stars record i think: hydraulic pump? not so sure
> about the title. Theo Parris used to play it... The beside (Dope Computer)
> samples George Clinton's Atomic Dog
Can you point me out to a website with some p funk information?
> The string section from strings of live i
| -Original Message-
| From: Jongsma, K.J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:03 PM
|
| from an old p funk all stars record i think: hydraulic pump? not so sure
| about the title. Theo Parris used to play it... The beside (Dope Computer)
| samples George Clinton's A
> strings of life?
> james got his credits.. so...
>
> flash?
> from wich song is this samples?
from an old p funk all stars record i think: hydraulic pump? not so sure
about the title. Theo Parris used to play it... The beside (Dope Computer)
samples George Clinton's Atomic Dog
The string se
| -Original Message-
| From: Maarten Baute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1:44 PM
|
| > i guess fix 'flash' and strings of life are in the 10% then...
|
| strings of life?
| james got his credits.. so...
|
| flash?
| from wich song is this samples?
"Hydraulic Pum
> i guess fix 'flash' and strings of life are in the 10% then...
strings of life?
james got his credits.. so...
flash?
from wich song is this samples?
Greets,
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addition
ed up till this morining now
you know it has a sample in it.
Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/08/2002 21:12:18
To:313 mailing list <313@hyperreal.org>
cc:
Subject:Re: [313] Ugly Edits?
I give more credit to people that come up with new stuff...
Don't get me wro
> I give more credit to people that come up with new stuff...
>
> Don't get me wrong it's still a great tune..but sampling something is not
> the same as coming up with it yourself
>
> I reckon 90 % of techno records that become classics are completely original
or maybe you didn't recognise the
the mind of the
producer. I'm less awe-struck when the sound is a sample, but you know what
they say - 'if it kick, it kick period'...
| -Original Message-
| From: Paul Wise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:12 PM
| To: 313 mailing list
| Subject: Re:
yed?
>
>
>
>
> Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/08/2002 20:35:02
> To: 313 mailing list <313@hyperreal.org>
> cc:
>
>
> Subject:Re: [313] Ugly Edits?
>
> Strange I feel betrayed I love that deep burnt track... Didn't know
ailing list <313@hyperreal.org>
cc:
Subject: Re: [313] Ugly Edits?
Strange I feel betrayed I love that deep burnt track... Didn't know it
was sample
3> Both Deep Burnt and Ugly Edit 3 sample Freddie Hubbard "Little
Sunflower"
>
>>>> Tristan Watkins &l
ginal Message -
> From: "tom churchill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 3:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [313] Ugly Edits?
>
>
>> I don't have #2 or #3, but I think #3 has
;313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [313] Ugly Edits?
> I don't have #2 or #3, but I think #3 has the same Freddie Hubbard track
> that Pepe Bradock sampled for 'Deep Burnt' (the title escapes me - I'm
sure
> someone else will fi
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
