-Original Message-
From: synthetic detronik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
non-compliant said:
> I call it "anti-logics" basically take the chord theory try tossing it
out and create
new "chords" that are not the average... say multi-algorithmic sound
variations that randomize and create a
> >what happens, then take a chord, take out parts and add a variable
>
> Variables? Algorithms? This sounds more like writing C++ code then writing
> music.
I almost except that there is a strict mathematical relation between notes
that 'work' together in chords, so if chord structure is algori
From: "synthetic detronik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [313] a chord-flames
Im saying is take what we have learned and de-program that. I call it
"anti-logics" basically take the chord theory try tossing it out and create
new "chords" that are not t
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, synthetic detronik wrote:
> >>1) something one must avoid to evolve.
> >
> >What are you trying to say?
> >That we should throw 1000 years of music theory overboard?
I have no problem with doing away with 'traditional' music theory but this
does not mean banishing chords jus
1) something one must avoid to evolve.
What are you trying to say?
That we should throw 1000 years of music theory overboard?
I love starting a heated discussion. I apalogize for freeking out some of
you that dont know me.
Im not saying throw out 1000 years of music theory. By all means n
