lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: RE: [313] blueprint "ENCOUNTERS" {classifications}
>
> In a message dated 10/13/00 5:36:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << of course, classifications exist b
In a message dated 10/13/00 5:36:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< of course, classifications exist because they give people convenient
and simple ways to communicate ideas to one another (albeit sometimes at
the cost of accuracy). >>
from what I can gather in newsgroups and lists, "hard tec
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: [313] blueprint "ENCOUNTERS" {classifications}
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, John Shipman wrote:
>
> > probably depends who your talking to. "tribal' to one won't be "tribal"
to
> > another. i find tha
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, John Shipman wrote:
> probably depends who your talking to. "tribal' to one won't be "tribal" to
> another. i find that lots of times the lines between the classifications of
> this and that get blurred. you could definitely use both of these terms to
> describe ho, outline an
