On Fri, 24 May 2002, Mxyzptlk wrote:
>True enough. Ignoring reality and shutting down constructive discussion can
>also be seen as a negative attitude and that is also a fact.
>Because I don't see what you see does not mean my eyes are closed or I
>cannot "feel" accurately. Be careful of what you
At 04:50 PM 5/24/2002, you wrote:
Okay, I'm not one to say DEMF1 was greater than DEMF2, which was in turn
greater than DEMF3 is likely to be
that's a game of margins (like the "I was at Woodstock, or at
such-and-such a Rolling Stones gig in London, or DEMF1, and if you weren't
there, the
At 02:59 PM 5/24/2002, chad wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Mxyzptlk wrote:
>I doubt the vibe which permeated the air at DEMF I (which was conspicuously
>absent last year) will ever return in full force.
well, that's the past... but i feel this vibe you're talking about any
time i have the good for
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Mxyzptlk wrote:
>I doubt the vibe which permeated the air at DEMF I (which was conspicuously
>absent last year) will ever return in full force.
well, that's the past... but i feel this vibe you're talking about any
time i have the good fortune to visit (or even pass through)
