Original message
Subject:Re: (313) A reasonable compression rate?
Author: Guilherme Menegon Arantes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25th June 2005 3:13:12
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:21:08PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: "T
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:21:08PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: "Tristan Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: A reasonable compression rate?
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The storage requirements for 1000 records at 24 bit 96 KHz would be =
> astronomical. IIRC, I mixed down
Original message
Subject:Re: (313) A reasonable compression rate?
Author: matt kane's brain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 24th June 2005 3:55:23
> 24-bit 96kHz is 16.9 Mbytes / minute per channel.
Yeah, I should correct my post from
At 03:41 PM 6/24/2005, z66 wrote:
i guess some lossless format will take over sooner or later as bandwidth
and storage makes it accessible already
flac and Apple Lossless give 2:1 compression. Eh.
the Sony format you mentioned sounds interesting! i wonder of the way of
interpreting and descri
At 03:54 PM 6/24/2005, Tristan Watkins wrote:
But hell, 32 bit 96 KHz is nothing. Why not go for one of those audiophile
formats like Sony's 1 bit 2.1 MHz DVD audio format which is meant to
replicate the stream of analogue audio more accurately than larger bit
types? No clue what kind of file s
seconded! however i'm making use of encoded audio already and most
likely i'll have to deal with it a lot during next 5 years, so i'm
interested to handle the matter best way possible at any time.
///Z
>>Getting fanatical about any of these choices is a bit silly
>>if you ask me,as five
..
i'm using lame LAME 3.90.3 for MP3 encoding using VBR [which in average
turns out to be ~200kbps]. been mostly encoding seedee extracted WAVs as
well as my own production and i can't tell much of a difference, maybe
sounds a little more 'compact'. lame encoding presets are optimized and
> Getting fanatical about any of these choices is a bit silly
> if you ask me,as five years from now there'll probably be a
>new format that poops all over the compession of today
>and we'll all be glad we kept the vinyls so that we can re-encode
>everything from the source in the new format.
