<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> o.uk>cc: 313@hyperreal.org
>
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: (313)
&g
.uk> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/04/04 09:38 AMSubject: RE: Re: Re: (313) Big
Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of
cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
03/04/04 09:38 AMSubject: RE: Re: Re: (313) Big
Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of
Anyone who posts on a messageboard is either obsessed or bored at work: I'm both
-Original Message-
From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:35 PM
To: Robert Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs De
OTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of
the Original Hot Mix 5)
Not totally following you there, since 'entertaining', 'perplexing' and
'deviant' are all words that I would use 'funny' as an al
]; Brendan Nelson
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe
> story of the
> Original Hot Mix 5)
>
>
> I think people here ARE obsessed, but in a perfectly natural,
> healthy way of course.
>
> -Original Message-
>
Not totally following you there, since 'entertaining', 'perplexing' and
'deviant' are all words that I would use 'funny' as an alternative to. Could
you explain what you mean a bit, or am I taking a joke to literally (again)? :)
You wrote:
>
> >>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us
I think people here ARE obsessed, but in a perfectly natural, healthy way of
course.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:35 PM
To: Brendan Nelson
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno
ine.co.uk> cc:
Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big
Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 March 2004 15:25
>
> >>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being a bunch of
> definition obsessed trainspotters.
>
> I wouldn't exactly say that we are definition obsessed...
This obviou
>>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being a bunch of
definition obsessed trainspotters.
I wouldn't exactly say that we are definition obsessed - more like a
slightly unhealthy preoccupation with objects and figures that nobody else
really cares for.
And, I'm sorry, but I have
>
> Isn't there an inherent contradiction there? Don't we stop being outsiders
> once we've found other people like ourselves to form a group with? I think
> being a outsider (i.e. fundamentally isolated/misunderstood) is a bittersweet
> experience at best. I've had periods in my life like that a
This self-image has two component parts: personal identity and social
identity (the number of social identities one person may have has no
theoretical limit).
Does this mean it's okay to belong to the idm list AND 313?
--
Mike
> I nearly wet pants at the post that said "techno without the 4/4 drum is
> breaks"
>
> Brilliant!
It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being a bunch of definition
obsessed trainspotters. I've been to and enjoyed the Big Chill (though I have
to admit more for the late night mong
i love this listyesterday we were talking about ball hanging out of
G-strings and today social theory
keep it coming
:)
robin...
On 4 Mar 2004, at 14:24, Ken Odeluga wrote:
Does it matter that we're so cut off from the mainstream?
I personally wouldn't have it any other way, b
> Does it matter that we're so cut off from the mainstream?
>> I personally wouldn't have it any other way, but then again my
>income doe=
>> sn't rely on it.
All this is reminding me of some theories which I came across in the distant
past ...
"Social identity theories Tajfel and Turner, amon
dn't have it any other way, but then again my income doe=
> sn't rely on it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:45 PM
> To: Martin
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) Big Chill vs
I nearly wet pants at the post that said "techno without the 4/4 drum is
breaks"
Brilliant!
>Does it matter that we're so cut off from the mainstream?
We'll always be outsiders - which is cool by me...
Martin
4/3/04 1:44 PM Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Well you certainly got the goat of some of t
>From my personal experience : among my friends, a number of them will know
>(and love), say, Plastikman, Kenny Larkin, and Maurizio, but without
>necessarily seeing them as part of a common scene / network of influences...
>they won't know what 313 means, but know the artists talked about.
Gwe
I personally wouldn't have it any other way, but then again my income doesn't
rely on it.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Bean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:45 PM
To: Martin
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasTh
Well you certainly got the goat of some of the people posting on that thread
Martin. Those were the bits that I found quite funny/stroke interesting.
Despite the general (possibly artificial) atmosphere of 'fluffy niceness' that
the Big Chill forums have, some of the responses to your posts were
I should point out that we did that for a joke after the snotty mouth we got
off the promoter - I don't know if you've been but it's like a large meeting
of people who read the Guardian with the volume set to about 4 - great if
your white, middle class, with kids and in the C2 and above social grou
Oh dear, sounds like I should definitely have been a bit more patient
since all those tracks qualify as techno in my book.
Agreed that Freddy Fresh was good - really heavy breaks + an
absolutely fantastic moustache
Forgot to mention Bugz In The Attic - they were excellent, really
maintaining
> You should have hung around - he played a few obvious things
> which are still techno as far as I am aware - Strings of Life
> by Rhythim Is Rhythim, Black Water by Octave One (its still
> techno even though he played the instrumental), that new Carl
> Craig and Laurent Garnier one... Maybe
From: "Matthew MacQueen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [313] big chill
Re:
> CHILLIN' AT EASTNOR CASTLE - 16-18 AUGUST 2002
> just thought some people might be interested - list-members
> CiM and myself are performing, along with many other
> quality acts, sho
Re:
> CHILLIN' AT EASTNOR CASTLE - 16-18 AUGUST 2002
> just thought some people might be interested - list-members
> CiM and myself are performing, along with many other
> quality acts, should be a great weekend...
Hey, I was going to try and cross the pond for this one to see you 2 plus the
o
26 matches
Mail list logo
