RE: (313) Laura Gavoor Tribute (was Re: (313) DEMF (R))

2003-02-02 Thread Cyclone Wehner
Yes, that's what I understood too. I just think it would be a great thing. > From:  "Rob Theakston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:  RE: (313) Laura Gavoor Tribute (was Re: (313) DEMF (R)) > Date:  31/01/2003 4:02:15 > To:  <313@hyperreal.org>      > >

RE: (313) Laura Gavoor Tribute (was Re: (313) DEMF (R))

2003-01-30 Thread Rob Theakston
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (313) Laura Gavoor Tribute (was Re: (313) DEMF (R)) In a message dated 1/30/2003 9:58:27 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED

(313) Laura Gavoor Tribute (was Re: (313) DEMF (R))

2003-01-30 Thread Oscillate
In a message dated 1/30/2003 9:58:27 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That would be the most honorable thing that D. May and Co. could ever do for Laura's memory. Peter Wohelski > Me I would like one thing - a small tribute to Laura Gavoor which could be > achieved easily by

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-30 Thread Cyclone Wehner
That's the vibe I get too. It will probably be the most democratic & grassroots festival since number 1. > From:  "Rob Theakston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:  RE: (313) DEMF (R) > Date:  29/01/2003 10:40:18 > To:  <313@hyperreal.org>      > &g

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-30 Thread Cyclone Wehner
Derrick knows that, otherwise he wouldn't have done it. > Best of luck to Transamt, D may, K Saunderson, and C Craig people are going > to be looking at them to pull it off.

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-30 Thread Cyclone Wehner
om:  "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:  RE: (313) DEMF (R) > Date:  29/01/2003 18:36:41 > To:  xx xx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]     > >    XX XX: >>definitely, >>Smart people surround themselves with co

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-30 Thread Cyclone Wehner
This I too don't agree with but xx xx is entitled to an opinion. I have known Richard for years and years and he is highly capable, works extremely hard, and is experienced with event management. I think everyone should have more faith. Anyway, with all respect, what the hell has a boxer got to do

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-30 Thread Cyclone Wehner
>> From:  "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject:  RE: (313) DEMF (R) >> Date:  29/01/2003 19:55:53 >> To:  Chris Anglesey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]     >> >>    It's not Carol Marvin. This individual knows a lot

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-30 Thread Cyclone Wehner
I know xx xx and this individual has a right to those views, whether or not others agree, this person is active in the scene, they are not Ms Marvin. It would be some initiative for Ms Marvin to be here, actually! >  From:  "scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:  Re: (313

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-30 Thread FC2 Richards
Really??? is that the way it works?? Then what the hell is going on in the Lions organization?? Jeff -Original Message- From: spw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:46 AM To: Rob Theakston; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) DEMF (R) If your C.E.O. of a

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-29 Thread scotto
> If they do air them on 313 then I feel they should also validate them (which > he/she doesn't) > and not hide behind some anonymous moniker. On the other hand it's possible > that > he/she was born 'xx xx' or then again maybe YOU ARE CAROL MARVIN IN DISGUISE > ?? the persons name is in there e

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-29 Thread spw
disregard my previous email regarding the DEMF. on 1/28/03 9:39 PM, Rob Theakston at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If your C.E.O. of a company and you decided to micromamage putting other >> people in charge of operations since you have obligations if something goes >> wrong the blame is still with

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-29 Thread Odeluga, Ken
y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:42 AM >To: 313@hyperreal.org >Subject: Re: (313) DEMF (R) > > >I notice that in recent weeks list-member 'xx xx' has been putting down May >& co. >a lot, accusing them of not being able to run

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-29 Thread Chris Anglesey
I notice that in recent weeks list-member 'xx xx' has been putting down May & co. a lot, accusing them of not being able to run 'simple infrastructures' such as record labels and saying that they are incompetent of running the DEMF 2003. No problem with him/her saying this, it's a public forum whe

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-29 Thread Odeluga, Ken
XX XX: >definitely, >Smart people surround themselves with competent people Hmmm, who's friend isn't being booked this year? ... k

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-29 Thread spw
make that: 'micro manage' 'poorly organized' Derrick May won the contract right? Well that's all there really is to say. Best of luck to Transamt, D may, K Saunderson, and C Craig people are going to be looking at them to pull it off. on 1/28/03 8:46 PM, spw at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If your

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-29 Thread spw
If your C.E.O. of a company and you decided to micromamage putting other people in charge of operations since you have obligations if something goes wrong the blame is still with the C.E.O. People are going to blame Derrick May and the people assosiated with this years festival (advisory board) if

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-28 Thread Rob Theakston
One things for sure. I'm glad I'm not in Derrick May or Carl Craig shoes, that's a lot of stress and pressure to put on one person. MILLIONS of people are counting on them to make this festival happen. It's not on one person's shoes. There's a whole team of people in place working extreme

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-28 Thread Rob Theakston
The solution is to let D May and C Craig run this years festival if they cant take care of business they only have themselves to blame. It's smart the city has D May on a one year trail basis. While Carl is serving on the creative director/advisory board, he is NOT...repeat NOT 'running

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-28 Thread spw
One things for sure. I'm glad I'm not in Derrick May or Carl Craig shoes, that's a lot of stress and pressure to put on one person. MILLIONS of people are counting on them to make this festival happen. on 1/28/03 4:30 PM, spw at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The solution is to let D May and C Craig

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-28 Thread spw
The solution is to let D May and C Craig run this years festival if they cant take care of business they only have themselves to blame. It's smart the city has D May on a one year trail basis. on 1/28/03 1:33 PM, xx xx at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Current Status: Abandoned: Applicant failed

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-28 Thread spw
The solution is to let D May and C Craig run this years festival if they cant take care of business they only have themselves to blame. It's smart the city has D May on a one year trail basis. on 1/28/03 1:33 PM, xx xx at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Current Status: Abandoned: Applicant failed

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-28 Thread xx xx
definitely, Smart people surround themselves with competent people From: "Mark Freitas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "xx xx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<313@hyperreal.org> Subject: RE: (313) DEMF (R) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:36:58 -0600 To be fair, the abando

RE: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-28 Thread Mark Freitas
To: Mark Freitas; 313@hyperreal.org Cc: Subject: Re: (313) DEMF (R) >Current Status: Abandoned: Applicant failed to respond to an Office action ah,ah,ah, ROFL,is it the same guy who wants to run a business, put D music to the next level?

Re: (313) DEMF (R)

2003-01-28 Thread xx xx
Current Status: Abandoned: Applicant failed to respond to an Office action ah,ah,ah, ROFL,is it the same guy who wants to run a business, put D music to the next level? The building block around which an artist constructs his/her professional appearance, is attitude. If one can’t meet dea