looks interesting. latency looks a little high tho (12ms
vs. 7
for FS afaik).
robin...
-> -Original Message-
-> From:
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> org] On Behalf Of josh23
-> Sent: 03 April 2004 02:56
-> To: 313@hyperreal.org
-> Subject: RE:
gt; > by the
-> > > > > > turntable! Word!!!
-> > > > > >
-> > > > > >
-> > > > > > At 01:02 PM 4/2/2004, you wrote:
-> >
a video mixer so you can
> control
> > > > > > > video files as well as audio files. Plus if you are a computer
> synthesis
> > > > > > > geek, you can write your own MAX/MSP/Jitter patches to be
> > > > >
is
> > > > > > geek, you can write your own MAX/MSP/Jitter patches to be controlled
> > by the
> > > > > > turntable! Word!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At 01:02 PM 4/2/2004, you wrote:
>
controlled
> > by the
> > > > > > turntable! Word!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At 01:02 PM 4/2/2004, you wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > - it's
gt; > >
> > > > >
> > > > > At 01:02 PM 4/2/2004, you wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > - it's not what you'
4/2/2004, you wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > - it's not what you've got but how you use it
> > > > > >
> > > > > >MEK
> > > > > >
> >
>
> > > >
> > > > At 01:02 PM 4/2/2004, you wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > - it's not what you've got but how you use it
> > > > >
> > > > >MEK
> > > > >
> > > > >
t; >
> > >
> > > At 01:02 PM 4/2/2004, you wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > - it's not what you've got but how you use it
> > > >
> > > >MEK
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
x27;ve got but how you use it
> > >
> > >MEK
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Steward,
> > > Tim"
> > >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313
>
>
> >MEK
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Steward,
> > Tim"
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313
> > <313@hyperreal.org>
> > uware.com>
uware.com> cc:
Subject: RE: (313)Final
scratch
04/02/04 02:43
PM
What's the overall opinion of final scratch -
a dj showing up to gig with a laptop vs decks
Just a question?
Because I have seen some use just
uware.com> cc:
Subject: RE: (313)Final scratch
What's the overall opinion of final scratch -
a dj showing up to gig with a laptop vs decks
Just a question?
Because I have seen some use just the laptop
and final scratch and you just don't get the same
vibe... But on the other hand I have seen Kevin
Saunderson use it along with decks and rocked
>
> the counter-intuitive part of mixing is tuning your perception to two
> different streams of audio at the same time.
statements like this sounds a lot like people who used to say it was
un-natural for people to listen to music made by machines.
something isn't un-natural just because you're n
> the main hurdle to overcome is that people (myself included i guess)
> like to get something tangible for their money, not just bits on a disk
> (which could fail)i suppose one way aroud this is to make sure that
> when you buy the tune in the digital format you want you effectively
> have a
cc:
>FWIW, a person I know works for a major label and is quite heavily
>involved with that label's anti-p2p efforts. He tells me that while the
>majors are confident that the next few years will see legitimate mp3
>services eclipse the illegal ones in terms of visibility and prominence,
>they have ef
> We're way off topic now (i'll be on topic by the end of this mail so
> bear with me). The losses the companies attribute to
> piracy/p2p internet downloads are way off target anyway, this
> (19billion) is probably a RIAA figure.
It is as far as I'm aware - I think it's based on an estimate for
10/2/04 3:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -> They know they've lost and the only way is to prosecutes
> -> individuals - last
> -> tactic - fear.
> ->
> -> 19 billion lost vs 1.25 made, my accountant would say that's
> -> NOT a fair
> -> amount.
>
This is a figure from a independent professional rep
sorry to be a t**t, but I had to laugh...
>1.25 billion made
its a rum do when you're only making that much huh?!
but, anyway, thats nothing to do with anything, so carry on!
btw, Martin, that report you mentioned, is that available on the internet
or anything, might help me understand all this
10/2/04 2:34 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -> Thing is, most aren't paying for it - now that it's
> -> software, its wide open
> -> and no amount of encryption or copyright protection will
> -> save them - people
> -> aren't paying, fact...
>
> 12 months ago i'd have agreed with you there martin. at thi
-> Thing is, most aren't paying for it - now that it's
-> software, its wide open
-> and no amount of encryption or copyright protection will
-> save them - people
-> aren't paying, fact...
12 months ago i'd have agreed with you there martin. at this point in
time tho i'm not sure the big player
>There's just no pleasing us I reckon.
well, thats for sure.
no, yeah, I get what you're saying now.
I thought you were mis-understanding me and I'm wound up as it is today.
but anyway
alex
_
- End of messag
-> >well your kids are cool with it because it's free (and seen as
-> >rebellious) at the moment. when the music industry have all
-> this locked
-> >down (and let's face it they are getting there) and people
-> are paying 15
-> >quid (usual CD price) to download just data then they may face some
>but it always has been a tiny
> majority. and rest assured the large scale music industry will find a way
> to sell their products to the kids and collect the revenues. whether this
> is via mp3 or whatever downloadable format, or via a hard copy of
> something, I have no idea, but they'll still b
>This will always be the way but its not how the mass market works I'm
>afraid, you can't force people at gun point...
well, yeah, I was making the point that I think there will still be kids
buying stuff coming through, I didnt mean in a mass-market kind of sense.
I'm talking about it in relevan
I recently started using Ableton Live next to Traktor (FS), Vinyls and
Buzztracker. The freedom that comes along with this setup is pretty
genius. The only thing i miss right now are some Kaosspads II and
another set of arms/hands :)
The big thumb down of this setup:
It needs too much tablespace
-> Single sales are now the lowest they have ever been, in fact
-> I was in a
-> studio last week and the first thing they knocked out wasn't
-> a rough mix, it
-> was a fcuking ringtone!
nevermind the death of techno...this is the death of music!
robin...
10/2/04 1:15 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]@uk.pwc.com
>
>> Kids are cool with it and they don't give a frig about all the gubbings,
>> kinda like my old man moaning about having to buy CD's - it's over...As
> cool
>> as I think records are the next generation don't care and you won't make
>> them either..
-> > there is something to be said for the intuitive interface
-> of a pair of
-> > decks with vinyl on them don't you think?
->
-> Not in my case, just seems pointless as I hate backspins and
-> only ever
-> scratch me rude bits not me records...Wouldn't say it was
-> intuitive either,
-> more
>Kids are cool with it and they don't give a frig about all the gubbings,
>kinda like my old man moaning about having to buy CD's - it's over...As
cool
>as I think records are the next generation don't care and you won't make
>them either...
I reckon I'm not that sure about that.
I think that a l
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 February 2004 12:55
> >
> > there is something to be said for the intuitive interface
> > of a pair of decks with vinyl on them don't you think?
>
> Not in my case, just seems pointless as I hate backspins and only
10/2/04 12:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -> Of the two, I would say Ableton offers more advantages than
> -> Final Scratch
> -> but requires more prep work before a set. I really can't see
> -> the point in
> -> buying the vinyl side of Final Scratch unless you plan to do
> -> some scratching
> ->
-> Of the two, I would say Ableton offers more advantages than
-> Final Scratch
-> but requires more prep work before a set. I really can't see
-> the point in
-> buying the vinyl side of Final Scratch unless you plan to do
-> some scratching
-> or love doing backspins.
there is something to b
7
> To: Bleep43; Thorin Teague; 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: (313) final scratch (fwd)
>
>
> I'm really annoyed that I didn't make it down on Saturday,
> considering what I've heard about Surgeon's set that night!
> But what I've still not gath
I believe it was Ableton Live, all the way.
-Original Message-
From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 February 2004 10:17
To: Bleep43; Thorin Teague; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch (fwd)
I'm really annoyed that I didn't make it down o
Ableton, from what people
have been saying about the set...
> -Original Message-
> From: Bleep43 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 February 2004 22:02
> To: Thorin Teague; 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
>
>
> It's a major technologi
erreal.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch (fwd)
I thought he was using Ableton Live.
-Original Message-
From: Bleep43 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2004 10:02
To: Thorin Teague; 313@hyp
I thought he was using Ableton Live.
-Original Message-
From: Bleep43 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 February 2004 10:02
To: Thorin Teague; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
It's a major technological breakthrough for the art of DJing, so therefore
it
>On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Ryan Snowden wrote:
>
>> For all those enterprising young minds out there, it's time to
>come up with
>> a similar version of final scratch and sell it at a cheaper cost
>to undercut
>> final scratch :) In 5 years time we can't have final scratch dictating
>> prices can we?
I like their quote... "it may not be the real thing... but at least you're
playing with vinyl!" ehehe :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 February 2004 8:52 AM
To: Ryan Snowden
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313
- Original Message -
From: "Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Phonopsia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Bleep43" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Thorin Teague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<313@hyperreal.org>
Sen
ssage-
> From: Carissa Tintinalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 February 2004 5:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: (313) final scratch
>
> I think there's been an interesting economic impact, especially for those
> djs who
MAIL PROTECTED]>; "Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Bleep43" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Thorin Teague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
> - Origina
y to do all the mainboards
-Original Message-
From: Carissa Tintinalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 February 2004 5:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch
I think there's been an interesting economic impact, especially for
those
djs
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Bleep43" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Thorin Teague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:55 PM
Subject: Re:
2 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch
I think there's been an interesting economic impact, especially for those
djs who don't or barely make an income from playing out.
Final Scratch has allowed a lot of djs I know to sell off large chunks of
their record
]>;
<313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
> FInal Scratch, for all its convenience, is yet to make a Dj set
> considerable better. In fact, I still think its slowed down things like
> track selection.
>
> Ablet
leep43 <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>, Thorin Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
02/09/04 04:55 PM 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) f
before artist can sell direct to the punter and make enough to
> live on without all the hassle and have direct contact and feedback. It's
> not as far away as you may think.
>
> Martin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bleep43" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch (fwd)
> It's a major technological breakthrough for the art of DJing, so therefore
> it will have both positive and negative aspects. I'm seriously considering
It's a major technological breakthrough for the art of DJing, so therefore
it will have both positive and negative aspects. I'm seriously considering
buying it so that I can then start playing all genres of music when playing
out.
Surgeon's set at Split on Saturday in London confirmed to me what t
I think there's been an interesting economic impact, especially for those
djs who don't or barely make an income from playing out.
Final Scratch has allowed a lot of djs I know to sell off large chunks of
their record collections so they could make money to buy more records, buy
gear, press tr
I'm not an authority on the matter by any stretch of the imagination, but my
gut instinct is that vinyl DJ'ing was about to die (relatively speaking--by
"about to die" I mean within 5 years), and final scratch probably single
handedly added at least 5-10 more years to the craft's lifespan (those
i think jeff mills, final scratch, richie hawtin, macintoshes, 909 sounds
and soul music (including Amp Fiddler) are all DEAD and/or
OVER/UNDER-RATED! and shxt, don't get me started on women in techno
;)
-d
> -Original Message-
> From: Rebekah Farrugia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
org>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: RE: (313) final scratch recording?
> Now if they would just add some recording functionality, it would be a
perfect system. Sux you have to have an additional recording device just to
record yourself. It'd be nice if something like
Now if they would just add some recording functionality, it would be a perfect
system. Sux you have to have an additional recording device just to record
yourself. It'd be nice if something like soundforge was built into this app.
Anyone know anything about possible upgrades??
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, James Bucknell wrote:
> francois k played sydney last night using a titatium powerbook and two
> turntables. looks like final scratch has been ported for mac osx!
>
> so, anybody want to buy a few thousand classic chicago/detroit/new york
> house and techno records?
you've bu
> About FS and Traktor...John Tejada told me today that now
> Tracktor has
> merged with final scratch and are combining the two in a new
> concept to be
> presented this week at Namm (L.A)
> I think It will be the next big thing !
> ...I suppose it will work on Mac too...
> ...but don't wait
the sound system at gas (where fk played sat) is absolutely crap. that's why
he sounded crap on the eqs and echo/delay. on the vinyl sound system at body
and soul, fk's use of the eqs was beyond reproach (which can't be said for
joe claussel, he gets a wee bit carried away).
anyway, we were there
Benn Glazier wrote on Sun, 12 Jan 2003 about following:
> > > Nice to hear tunes like Maurizio's M4.5, Baby Wants to Ride by Frankie
> > > Knuckles,
> >
> > Jamie Principle actually ;-)
> >
>
> Interesting you say this.. As I have a copy of it on FFRR which credits
> Jamie Principle, and the or
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:25:59 +1100 (EST), "David Gillies"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Benn Glazier said:
> > I was less than impressed with the night to be honest. Mixing quite
> > ropey at times, however I found from about 3 to 4.30 was the best - left
> > shortly afterwards.
> >
> > Nice to hear
ld my vinyls ;-) !
Fabrice Lig
http://www.multimania.com/fabricelig/
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: <313@hyperreal.org>
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch on mac!
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 14:50:26 -0800
it's coming very soon, but the
Benn Glazier said:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:56:51 -0500, "James Bucknell"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> francois k played sydney last night using a titatium powerbook and two
>> turntables. looks like final scratch has been ported for mac osx!
>>
>> so, anybody want to buy a few thousand classic c
Final Scratch will be released for MacOS early this year. I'd say he'd
be one of the beta testers ;)
Peace,
Patrick.
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 10:11 AM, Benn Glazier wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:56:51 -0500, "James Bucknell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
francois k played sydney last nig
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:56:51 -0500, "James Bucknell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> francois k played sydney last night using a titatium powerbook and two
> turntables. looks like final scratch has been ported for mac osx!
>
> so, anybody want to buy a few thousand classic chicago/detroit/new york
>
year and want to get
more
use out of it..
scotto
lansing, mi.
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Cc: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: (313) fi
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Cc: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: (313) final scratch on mac!
> Could've been Traktor.
>
> There&#
Could've been Traktor.
There's a few dj's who are using it these days.
Similar to FS but different.
G
James Bucknell wrote:
>
> francois k played sydney last night using a titatium powerbook and two
> turntables. looks like final scratch has been ported for mac osx!
>
> so, anybody want to
g
:Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
:
:If you have Mac X, it has the ability to emulate windows. There is a
:decent
:chance that you could run final scratch through the emulation
capabilities.
:- Original Message -
:From: "scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:To: <313@
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, logic7 wrote:
> FS requires a true linux partition, not a virtual one, it adds a bootloader
> to the MBR so one can boot to either FS/Linux or Windows. It's not an
> embedded linux either, it's more like a mini distribution.
Not so. FS 1.0 installs itself into a ~300MB c:\fi
there's tons of
> info about this.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "logic7" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Kookie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "scotto"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <313@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, N
True that. But FS runs on linux (not windows)
-Original Message-
From: Kookie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:34 PM
To: scotto; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
If you have Mac X, it has the ability to emulate windows. There is a
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:04 PM
To: logic7; Kookie; scotto; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
not really. it's not a matter of linux-to-PPC linux translation. FS
doesn't run on a full lin
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:51 AM
Subject: RE: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
> In theory, Final Scratch could simply be recompiled for PPC versions of
> Linux. Then it would work with cha
esday, November 12, 2002 2:34 PM
To: scotto; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch mac Q
If you have Mac X, it has the ability to emulate windows. There is a decent
chance that you could run final scratch through the emulation capabilities.
- Original Message -
From: "scott
.
>
> one question, for the lynix geeks, could you load lynix on to the mac and
> run FS?
>
> scotto
> lansing, mi
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Darren Longton (Marketing)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
c and
run FS?
scotto
lansing, mi
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Longton (Marketing)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:01 PM
Subject: RE: (313) Final Scratch
>From F
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:29 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Final Scratch
when the hell is the mac version coming out?
scotto
lansing, mi
- Original Message -
From: "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313 Detroit" <313@hyperreal.org&
when the hell is the mac version coming out?
scotto
lansing, mi
- Original Message -
From: "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313 Detroit" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 7:47 AM
Subject: (313) Final Scratch
>From my 'Business Development Specialist' source
dude the truth is that mp3s cannot be sold man! try to sell me an mp3.. I dare
ya! I will just go around ya. cause its allready on kazaa...
> Wrom: KVFVWRKJVZCMHVIBGDADRZFSQHYU
> date:Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:49:24
> to: 313@hyperreal.org
> subject: RE: [313] F
ke this could be replicated by a delay
line which is lowpass filtered and added to the signal after a few ms's.."
-Original Message-
From: Ploegmakers, Joost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:13 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: [313] FiNal S
1. i think the reason why big corporstion don't take risks with new artists
anymore, also has a lot to do with the fact that it'll put them in a worse
compitition position. investing in something that probably won't be a big
commercial success, but has artistic value will therefore make your
- Original Message -
From: "Ploegmakers, Joost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Langsman, Marc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [313] FiNal ScrAtch - finally roadtested...
> Wether
ll hear
it.
You can already hear the difference when playing vinyl and CDs. CDs sound
less "deep" on the dancefloor.
Joost
-Original Message-
From: Langsman, Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 19 september 2002 16:32
To: 'Ploegmakers, Joost'; 313@hyperrea
Heh! I'm the pupil not the master!
(And I don't drive).
k
>-Original Message-
>From: ollie barkovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:35 PM
>To: Sakari Karipuro; Odeluga, Ken
>Cc: 313
>Subject: Re: [313] Final Scratch - thou
ollie barkovic wrote on Thu, 19 Sep 2002 about following:
> Wow that¹s some serious processing, lets see...
>
> That¹s, hmmm $2729.98 USD or $4400 cdn
Good stuff is never cheap. but luckily i didn't have to pay. i know some
people who've purchased this stuff.. and i get to use them occasion
>That¹s, hmmm $2729.98 USD or $4400 cdn
>
>More that my car!
think you can get cooledit for about $70 and Im sure it does all of that
stuff - I use it to clean up mixes Ive recorded and it seems to do the job
pretty darn well.
>> *) you sample ~1 second of noise and then the plugin filters th
y, September 19, 2002 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [313] Final Scratch - thoughts...
Wow that¹s some serious processing, lets see...
Sound Forge - $349.99 + NR $279.97
Waves - the plugs you mention are available in the Platinum bundle $2100.00
That¹s, hmmm $2729.98 USD or $4400 cdn
More that my c
Wow that¹s some serious processing, lets see...
Sound Forge - $349.99 + NR $279.97
Waves - the plugs you mention are available in the Platinum bundle $2100.00
That¹s, hmmm $2729.98 USD or $4400 cdn
More that my car!
o
On 9/19/02 10:06 AM, "Sakari Karipuro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> O
age-
>From: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 2:29 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org
>Subject: RE: [313] Final Scratch - thoughts...
>
>
>
>>i tend to remove noise & rumble, scratches and stuff and remaster the
>>tracks for
remark in this whole discussion however.
>One great
>aspect about playing music from vinyl is feedback; the amplified music,
>specifically bass, reflects back on the record and gets picked
>up by the
>needle again and amplified again. Too much feedback leads to
>rumble, but
>just enough create
Odeluga, Ken wrote on Thu, 19 Sep 2002 about following:
> >i tend to remove noise & rumble, scratches and stuff and remaster the
> >tracks for louder volume, as well as EQ them a bit.
> >
> technology but that just rams it home. Just out of curiousity can I ask how
> you do that? (Pls keep it simp
EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [313] Final Scratch - thoughts...
> > Inceidently it would be
> > interesting to know where Richie Hawtin gets the MP3s he's used in his
sets.
> >
> Inceidently it would be
> interesting to know where Richie Hawtin gets the MP3s he's used in his sets.
> Has he actually sat down and taken the time to encode his whole record
> collection?
yeah - he's playing out here next week and i thought about the same
questionI kinda came to the resol
I can see some benefits for small labels to Final Scratch amongst the many
questions it raises.
One thing that any small independent label wants is as many DJs spinning thier
releases as possible. The costs involved of mailing out x number of promo
copies to DJs who you will more than likley nev
>i tend to remove noise & rumble, scratches and stuff and remaster the
>tracks for louder volume, as well as EQ them a bit.
>
>sakke
I already knew I was off the scale on my lack of knowledge of audio
technology but that just rams it home. Just out of curiousity can I ask how
you do that? (Pls ke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for example, Delsin's new
compilation, or one of the new submerge CD's from a napster type site is
very very wrong, it's like stealing in my opinion.
That is stealing. I don't think Neil was advocating this, his point
remains that if a small label wants people to ta
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
