On 19 Jan 2007, at 19:40, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/07, pauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
81,000 cd's ( the ammount confiscated) of other peoples music surely
stretches the definition of 'mix tape' though...if he's selling
those sorts
of figures then 'doing it for the love' doesn't r
On 1/19/07, Matt Kane's Brain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even if it's something that eventually gets to an album, that album
sells more because you can't get that kind of promotion elsewhere.
The RIAA should be PAYING DJ Drama for this.
soon they will be as he is signed to a major label to cont
Even if it's something that eventually gets to an album, that album
sells more because you can't get that kind of promotion elsewhere.
The RIAA should be PAYING DJ Drama for this.
On Jan 19, 2007, at 14:40, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
mixtapes like the ones he sells do NOT contain released ma
On 1/20/07, pauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
81,000 cd's ( the ammount confiscated) of other peoples music surely
stretches the definition of 'mix tape' though...if he's selling those sorts
of figures then 'doing it for the love' doesn't really cut it and if you
want to argue the promotional sid
And yes I should read my posts before I post them.
Of course Drama made money selling mix tapes, but mix tapes are not a
series of unlicensed tracks from commercial releases. Mixtape tracks
are based on commercial releases, but are mixed DJ-style, edited, cut
with new vocals by the MCs being featured, etc. They're a completely
different thing tha
en again at those numbers it
ceases to be promotion and becomes re-distribution...without a license...
-Original Message-
From: kent williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 10:25 AM
To: list 313
Subject: Re: (313) RIAA at it again
Not that this is probably of
Oh and this is personal for me: My mom is a composer and arranger, and
Sony owes her thousands of dollars in back royalties for work she did
in the 90s. Sony only pays her when she goes to the trouble to have a
lawyer threaten to sue them. She finally got fed up with Sony and
found other sources
Not that this is probably of more than tangential importance to the
313 list but:
This arrest was complete bullsh?t, has caused an Internet and
main-stream-media uproar. Look on Youtube for the Fox news report on
the arrest -- the whole thing is a trumped up pile of poo.
I'd be scared if DJ Dra
On 1/19/07, David Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kent, this is serious and it's not the RIAA who will be on trial, it's
not even being charged as copyright infringement - they are charging
them with a felony violation of Georgia's Racketeering Influenced
Corrupt Organization law(known as RICO)
Kent, this is serious and it's not the RIAA who will be on trial, it's
not even being charged as copyright infringement - they are charging
them with a felony violation of Georgia's Racketeering Influenced
Corrupt Organization law(known as RICO). For those who don't know,
these are the laws normal
On 19 Jan 2007, at 16:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the f*ck is this?
As of yesterday DJ Drama was sitting in jail,
but dozens of his unlicensed compilations were still available at the
iTunes shop.
Why isn't iTunes/Apple being held accountable for distributing and
profiting of
What the f*ck is this?
>As of yesterday DJ Drama was sitting in jail,
>but dozens of his unlicensed compilations were still available at the
iTunes shop.
Why isn't iTunes/Apple being held accountable for distributing and
profiting off of this as well?
MEK
"kent williams" <[EMAIL PROTE
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:48 AM
To: list 313
Subject: Re: (313) RIAA at it again
Record Industry Bad. Tell me something we don't know.
I hope DJ Drama goes to trial on this because he'll make chimps out of
the RIAA.
That's one thing about liking techno -- you don't have t
Record Industry Bad. Tell me something we don't know.
I hope DJ Drama goes to trial on this because he'll make chimps out of the RIAA.
That's one thing about liking techno -- you don't have to hold your
nose and buy major label releases, because there are none.
On 1/19/07, David Beattie <[EMAI
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:26:16 -0500, /0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "DJ Entropy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and I win a free song. The stupid thing is that a Pepsi costs more
than a
99 cent song, and I don't drink caffiene.
not yet anyways... :)
Nah, I used to
- Original Message -
From: "DJ Entropy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>and I win a free song. The stupid thing is that a Pepsi costs more than a
> 99 cent song, and I don't drink caffiene.
>
not yet anyways... :)
-Joe
Oh, and you can watch em all at http://www.ifilm.com/superbowl/
:)
That Pepsi and iTunes ad was pretty dumb, imo. Great, now I get a Pepsi,
and I win a free song. The stupid thing is that a Pepsi costs more than a
99 cent song, and I don't drink caffiene.
And it's all more expensive than
I was partial to this one:
hahahahaha.
Shards O Glass, lol!
(stream that in WMP, or try to download it with NetTransport, I couldn't
get it to download, MS sucks)
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 16:05:00 -0600, Michael E Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I found the ad on MSNBC.COM if anyone wants
I found the ad on MSNBC.COM if anyone wants to see it, Windows Media format
only of course...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4132154/
Direct link to the video
http://www.msnbc.com/m/mw/s/msnbc/asx.asp?s=300&a=sb_pepsiteens_040201&ad=&t
=v&promo=&fix
ML
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) RIAA at it again
I can't wait for the "Pespi told me to do it" statements to follow :)
2/2/04 1:40 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]@blueyonder.co.uk
> ahh I see,
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) RIAA at it again
ahh I see, so pepsi exploit these kids to sell their drinks and didn't Green
Day do the back
drop music?..I f
on
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Burd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon 02/02/2004 13:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: (313) RIAA at it again
>
>
>
> yep, i saw it. it was kinda funny though. the kids say,
ECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Cc:
Subject: RE: (313) RIAA at it again
yep, i saw it. it was kinda funny though. the kids say, "i was one of
the kids busted for downloading music for free off the Internet" and after a
few of them say the same
se, distribution,
copying or disclosure by another person is
strictly prohibited.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) RIAA at it again
sorry it was yeste
sorry it was yesterday during the superbowl...did anyone see it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 02/02/2004 12:47
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Cc:
Subject: (313) RIAA at it again
Four children bul
26 matches
Mail list logo
